Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 234 references

Geometric Methods for Stochastic Dynamical Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This book argues that the Onsager–Machlup most probable transition path is a special case of the Schrödinger bridge in the Dirac-mass limit, and that α-divergence minimizers—information geodesics—unify these transition paths in the space of

desk verdict A useful broad textbook whose headline unification—OM paths as Dirac-limit Schrödinger bridges—is asserted rather than proved; fine as exposition once the claims are reined in. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27237 v1 pith:543NFZYS submitted 2026-07-25 math.DS

Jinqiao Duan , Ting Gao , Qiao Huang , Yuanfei Huang This is my paper
classification math.DS MSC 60H1060J6049Q2258E30
keywords Onsager–MachlupfunctionalSchrödingerbridgemostprobabletransitionpathinformationgeodesicα-divergencemetastablestatesstochasticdynamicalsystemsspaceofprobabilitydensities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At the center of this book is the claim that three standard notions of 'most likely transition' in stochastic dynamics—the Onsager–Machlup most probable transition path, the Schrödinger bridge, and α-divergence information geodesics—are not separate constructs but different faces of one geometric variational principle on the space of probability densities. The load-bearing identification is that the classical Onsager–Machlup path, defined as the minimizer of an action functional over smooth paths, re-emerges as a Schrödinger bridge when the metastable boundary states are idealized as Dirac delta distributions. Replacing the Kullback–Leibler divergence in the bridge problem by α-divergences, the book defines 'information geodesics' as minimizers, and treats them as optimal density paths carrying generalized thermodynamic costs (Tsallis, Rényi). If the author's argument is right, a researcher has a single framework linking rare-event path probabilities, Schrödinger bridges, and entropy-based costs, including for non-Gaussian jump noise, and the framework connects to modern generative modeling in AI.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the bridge SDE (Doob h-transform) whose drift contains the log-transition-density gradient σ²∇log p; the identification of the Onsager–Machlup Lagrangian with the mechanical Lagrangian of a Schrödinger bridge via the second-order Hamilton–Jacobi equation; and the α-divergence functionals whose minimizers define information geodesics on the Wasserstein space of probability densities.

What would settle it

Take a one-dimensional double-well diffusion with known OM path (or an OU process with exact solution). Solve the Schrödinger bridge problem between two narrow Gaussians centered at the metastable states, let their widths tend to zero, and compare the limit of the bridge path (e.g., its midpoint and the whole curve) with the OM minimizer. If the limit does not converge to the OM path—or if H(P|R) − H(μ0|R0) diverges in that limit—the central claim is refuted. A direct check of the relative-entropy difference for the Brownian bridge reference with μ0 = δ_a is the sharpest probe.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is an identification, established through the Doob h-transform (the bridge SDE with log-density drift), between the most probable transition path of a diffusion and the most probable path of the bridge process, which solves a first-order ODE with drift −∇U + σ²∇log p. This bridge formulation is the same as the Schrödinger bridge problem: when the boundary distributions are Dirac masses, the relative-entropy minimizer degenerates to the Onsager–Machlup path. Generalizing further, the book replaces Kullback–Leibler divergence by α-divergences and introduces information geodesics as minimizers, showing that different α give different path-selection mechanisms and evolution mo

Load-bearing premise

The headline equivalence requires treating the difference of two infinite relative entropies, H(P|R) − H(μ0|R0), as a well-defined finite quantity when μ0 is a Dirac mass; the book states this 'can be finite' but supplies no limit theorem, and if that cancellation fails the Dirac-limit identification collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Most probable transition paths can be computed by solving Schrödinger bridge problems, so numerical methods for optimal transport and entropic projection become directly usable for rare-event path estimation.
  • The equivalence gives a rigorous bridge between path-space (Onsager–Machlup) and density-space (Schrödinger bridge) descriptions of metastable transitions, clarifying when tube-type most probable path calculations are consistent with boundary-distribution optimizations.
  • α-divergence minimizers provide a tunable family of 'most probable' transitions, indexed by α, with different α corresponding to different generalized entropy costs (Tsallis, Rényi), allowing the modeler to match the effective noise statistics.
  • The jump-diffusion Onsager–Machlup functional derived in Chapter 2 extends the framework to non-Gaussian Lévy noise, giving explicit formulas for the most probable tube for jump-diffusions with finite small-jump activity.
  • The connection to diffusion models and flow matching in AI suggests that the geometric theory can serve as a foundation for early-warning and mitigation of critical transitions in complex systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Dirac-limit identification holds, then entropic optimal transport solvers could be used as a black-box method for computing Onsager–Machlup paths by taking boundary measures as narrow Gaussians, with the infinite-entropy subtraction treated as a regularized limit; this is a testable numerical consequence the book leaves implicit.
  • The α-divergence family suggests an interpretation of the parameter α as a 'risk sensitivity' or effective temperature of the transition: varying α changes which fluctuations are deemed costly, which may be useful for systems where the noise is non-Gaussian but not Lévy.
  • The book's treatment of nonlocal (Lévy) theory flags open problems about what breaks in the geometric picture; one might conjecture that the α-stable case requires a fractional-order analogue of the Schrödinger bridge, which would be a natural next step.
  • A cautionary extension: the claim that OM paths are Schrödinger bridges in the Dirac limit is only as solid as the formal infinite-minus-infinite cancellation; if a careful limit theorem fails, the unification may hold only as a heuristic correspondence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This monograph aims to give a unified geometric account of transition paths in stochastic dynamics. It reviews SDEs driven by Brownian and Lévy noise, presents the Onsager–Machlup (OM) action and most probable transition paths for diffusion and jump-diffusion processes, develops stochastic Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, and links these to Schrödinger bridges and α-divergence 'information geodesics.' The central advertised claim is that the OM most probable path is mathematically recovered as a Schrödinger bridge when metastable states are idealized as Dirac masses, and that α-divergence minimizers provide a common geometric framework.

Significance. If the Dirac-limit theorem and the missing bridge lemmas were supplied, the book would offer a useful survey and a provocative synthesis: it connects rare-event tube asymptotics, Schrödinger bridges, and divergence-based path selection in the space of probability densities. The manuscript has real strengths: the review of stochastic calculus and Lévy processes is systematic, the standard material on Girsanov transformations, quasi-translation invariance, Benamou–Brenier structure, and Doob h-transforms is generally reliable, and the worked examples (Hongler's model, free Brownian motion) illustrate the intended methods. However, the novelty advertised in the abstract and preface—the Dirac-mass recovery of OM paths from Schrödinger bridges—is currently a formal statement, not a proved theorem. Several load-bearing results in Chapter 2 are left as exercises. The OM Euler–Lagrange equations contain an inconsistency in the ΔU coefficient. For these reasons the advertised unification is not yet established, though the gaps are localizable and probably repairable.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §3.4.2, Eq. (3.33)] The headline claim that the Onsager–Machlup path is 'mathematically recovered' as a Schrödinger bridge when metastable states are Dirac masses is not proved. The only support is the sentence after (3.33): when P0=μ0 is Dirac, H(P|R) and H(μ0|R0) are both infinite, while their difference 'can be finite as in (3.33).' But (3.33) is an exact identity for absolutely continuous marginals; it does not supply a limiting theorem for the infinite/infinite cancellation. One needs a family of absolutely continuous approximating marginals, a solution of the Schrödinger bridge for each member, and a proof that the normalized cost or the minimizing path converges to the OM minimizer. No such theorem, hypotheses on U, or convergence statement appears. This is load-bearing for the book's central claim, not a technical aside.
  2. [§2.1.2–2.1.3, Problems 2.1–2.2] Lemma 2.4 (OM functional and bridge measures), Lemma 2.5 (bridge measures equal laws of bridge SDEs), and Theorem 2.4 (Hamiltonian ODE system for MPTPs) are stated without proof; Problems 2.1–2.2 explicitly assign them to the reader. But Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 rely on Lemmas 2.4–2.5, and Theorem 2.5 relies on Theorem 2.4. Thus the central derivation of MPTPs via Markovian bridges and characteristic PDEs is conditional on unproved results. For a monograph whose advertised contribution is this synthesis, leaving these as exercises is a serious gap. They should be proved in the text, or the claims should be explicitly marked as conditional/or open.
  3. [§2.1, Eqs. (2.3), (2.21)–(2.22)] The OM functional and the resulting Euler–Lagrange equation are internally inconsistent. Equation (2.3) contains a term −4U(ψ), while the Lagrangian reduction in §2.1.4 defines V(x)=½|∇U|²−(σ²/2)ΔU. The Euler–Lagrange equation (2.22), however, has the ΔU term with coefficient 1/(2σ²), not σ²/2 as required by differentiation of V in (2.21). The Hamiltonian systems (2.23)–(2.24) and Theorems 2.4–2.5 inherit this factor, so the discrepancy propagates through the chapter. Since the central object of Chapter 2 is the OM action and its minimizers, this coefficient error must be corrected and reconciled with (2.3).
  4. [§2.3.2, Theorem 2.6] The derivation of the jump-diffusion OM functional is weaker than stated. After (2.84), the text concedes that Poisson integral contributions inside the tube were neglected and that 'there is generally no uniform upper bound on the number of jumps among all sample paths,' so the OM functional is 'only an approximation' and 'does not provide a fully complete description.' But Definition 2.4 defines the OM function through small-tube asymptotic equivalence. Without control of the number or size of jumps inside K(z,ε), the asymptotic (2.64) is not established. To make Theorem 2.6 a theorem, additional hypotheses (e.g., finite jump activity, small-jump dominance, or a uniform bound) are needed, or the result must be explicitly downgraded to a heuristic.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and OCR artifacts: 'Paritial' in the Chapter 4 heading, 'transition pat' in §2.1, 'Krammer-Moyal' in Problem 2.5, 'Riemainnian' in §1.1, 'Babara Gentz' in the Acknowledgments. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [§2.3.2, Eq. (2.84)/(2.85)] The notation for asymptotic equivalence is used loosely. Please specify whether the relation holds uniformly over the class of reference paths and make explicit the sense in which the additive constant is harmless for the minimization problem.
  3. [Chapter 3, Introduction] The text contains a missing citation: 'a probabilistic analogy with quantum mechanics inspired by Schrödinger [? ]'. This should be completed.
  4. [§3.4.2, Eq. (3.33)] The equivalence chain in (3.33) is central and deserves a reference or a short derivation. As written, the first equality (relative-entropy minimization equals kinetic/action minimization) is cited only indirectly via [143] and [57], which is acceptable, but the second equality should state the regularity assumptions on μ0, μT, and V needed for the Benamou–Brenier formulation to hold.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the OM functional and Schrödinger bridge are derived independently; the Dirac-limit unification is asserted rather than proved, but this is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The Onsager–Machlup functional is introduced through small-tube asymptotic probabilities (eq. 2.2) and its explicit form (eq. 2.3) is derived by Girsanov-type/quasi-translation-invariance arguments (eqs. 2.64, 2.76), with no fitted parameters or normalizations imported from the Schrödinger problem. The Schrödinger bridge is defined independently as the minimizer of relative entropy (eq. 3.28), and its Benamou–Brenier/action representation (eq. 3.33) is a standard variational identity. The claimed link in §3.4.3 is an explicit integration-by-parts identity: if S solves the second-order Hamilton–Jacobi equation (3.24), then ℏ OMSDE[γ] = ∫ L0 dt − S(T,γ(T)) + S(0,0) (eq. 3.37). This is a mathematical equivalence between two independently defined objects, not a definition of one in terms of the other. The only load-bearing assertion that is not supported by a proof is the Dirac-delta idealization: the Preface/abstract claim that the OM most probable transition path 'can be mathematically recovered as a special case of the Schrödinger bridge' when metastable states are idealized as Dirac masses. The text's only support is the sentence after (3.33): 'in the special case when P0 = μ0 is Dirac, the relative entropy in (3.28) and H(μ0|R0) are always infinite, while their difference H(P|R)−H(μ0|R0) can be finite as in (3.33).' This is an infinite-minus-infinite cancellation asserted without a limiting theorem or a family of approximating absolutely continuous marginals; it is a correctness/rigor gap, not a circular step. Cited prior results (e.g., [108]) are used for standard well-posedness and tube estimates, not to define the target quantities. Hence the circularity burden is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The book relies on standard stochastic calculus plus several domain assumptions. There are no data-fitted free parameters; α and ℏ are model parameters. The key non-standard assumptions are the formal Dirac-marginal regularization and the characterization of α-divergence minimizers as geodesics.

free parameters (2)
  • α (divergence parameter)
    α-divergences are introduced in the abstract and §4.4.1; different α values select different path-selection mechanisms. It is a free modeling parameter, not fitted to data.
  • ℏ (stochastic action / noise parameter)
    Introduced in §3.2.1 as the constant quadratic mean derivative Q_X = ℏ I defining the admissible diffusion class; it sets the noise level and is a model input, not estimated from data.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Itô stochastic calculus, Girsanov theorem, and standard martingale theory
    Used throughout Chapters 1–2 for SDEs, bridge measures, and measure changes; assumed as background.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1: local martingale problem is well posed and U ∈ C³
    Needed for strong existence, uniqueness, and Markov property of the SDE in §2.1.1.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.2: strict positivity of transition density and smoothness of h for n ≥ 2
    Imposed in §2.1.2 to ensure existence and uniqueness of the bridge SDE and the MPTP characterization.
  • domain assumption Quasi-translation invariance of the jump-diffusion measure for constant diffusion coefficient g = c
    Used to derive the jump-diffusion OM functional (2.63); Remark 2.9 notes it fails for nonconstant g.
  • ad hoc to paper Formal Dirac-marginal regularization: H(P|R) − H(μ0|R0) is finite
    Needed for the abstract’s claim that the OM path is a special case of the Schrödinger bridge; stated heuristically in §3.4.2, not proved as a limit theorem.
  • ad hoc to paper α-divergence minimizers define “information geodesics”
    The book coins the term and treats these minimizers as geodesics, but no theorem establishes a metric/geodesic structure for α-divergence paths beyond analogy.
invented entities (1)
  • Information geodesic
    purpose: Name for minimizers of α-divergence functionals, presented as optimal density paths unifying OM paths and Schrödinger bridges.
    Introduced in the preface and §4.4; it is a terminology/conjectural object with no independent falsifiable prediction outside the book.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Geometric Methods for Stochastic Dynamical Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/543NFZYS

@misc{pith2026260727237,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Geometric Methods for Stochastic Dynamical Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/543NFZYS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27237}
}
read the original abstract

Geometric methods are indispensable for analyzing, predicting, and mitigating the complex behaviors inherent in nonlinear systems. In this regime, the most probable transition path minimizes the Onsager-Machlup action functional, marking the likeliest route across an energy barrier. Lifting the analysis from individual sample paths to the infinite-dimensional space of probability densities, the book recasts these transitions as Schr\"odinger bridges - optimal paths between boundary distributions defined by minimizing relative entropy - and shows that the Onsager-Machlup path emerges as a special case when metastable states are idealized as Dirac masses. Generalizing further through {\alpha}-divergences, which connect to entropies and the thermodynamic cost of nonequilibrium transitions, it introduces information geodesics as the resulting optimal density paths, offering a unified geometric account of how complex systems move between metastable regimes under uncertainty.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27237 by the authors.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Bell shape: The probability density function for the standard Gaussian random [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. The probability density functions for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_1_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3. The probability density function for the standard symmetric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_1_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Hongler’s potential evaluated with the foundational parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p061_2_1.png]
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: Comparative analysis of the most probable transition paths simulated for Hon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_2_2.png]
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Implication map of the functional inequalities generated by a positive curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p120_4_1.png]
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: The two-point space (Example 4.1). Left: the logarithmic-mean mobility and the metric factor √ 𝑔; the integrable boundary blow-up yieldsW (𝛿1, 𝛿2) = 1.5587 < ∞. Middle: constant-speed geodesics; the dashed line is the linear (mixture) path, which is not a geodesic. R…
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Numerical face of Theorem 4.6. Geodesics between two separated bumps for the window kernel 𝐽𝜀 = 1{|𝑥 − 𝑦| ≤ 𝜀}. Left: the midpoint marginal deforms contin￾uously from the bimodal “teleport” profile to the unimodal travelling bump of 𝑊2 as 𝜀 shrinks. Right: mass in th…
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: Example 4.2: space–time densities 𝜌𝑡(𝑥) of the geodesic between two separated bumps. Local mass travels (left: diagonal ridge); heavy-tailed nonlocal mass teleports (right: two vertical columns); 𝑠 = 0.75 interpolates. Bimodality of the midpoint marginal is the obser…
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.5. Figure 4.5: Example 4.2, the quantitative fingerprint. Left: midpoint marginals 𝜌1/2; the lo￾cal solution is unimodal at 𝑥 = 0 (dashed: analytic displacement interpolation; the mild widening of the numerical curve is grid diffusion), while the heavy-tailed marginal is bimodal wi…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

234 extracted references · 17 linked inside Pith

  1. [34]

    Chao and J

    Y. Chao and J. Duan. The Onsager-Machlup function as Lagrangian for the most probable path of a jump-diffusion process.Nonlinearity, 32(10):3715, 2019

    2019

  2. [1]

    Abraham and J.E

    R. Abraham and J.E. Marsden. Foundations of mechanics . Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 2nd edition, 1978

    1978

  3. [2]

    R. A. Adams and J. J. F. Fourier.Sobolev Spaces. Academic Press, New York, second edition, 2003

    2003

  4. [3]

    Existenceofglobalsolutionsandinvariant measures for stochastic differential equations driven by poisson type noise with non-Lipschitz coefficients

    S.Albeverio,Z.Brzeźniak,andJ.Wu. Existenceofglobalsolutionsandinvariant measures for stochastic differential equations driven by poisson type noise with non-Lipschitz coefficients. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 371(1):309–322, 2010

    2010

  5. [4]

    Albeverrio, B

    S. Albeverrio, B. Rüdiger, and J. L. Wu. Invariant measures and symmetry prop- erty of Lévy type operators.Potential Analysis, 13:147–168, 2000

    2000

  6. [5]

    S. Amari. Information Geometry and Its Applications , volume 194 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, 2016

    2016

  7. [6]

    Amari and H

    S. Amari and H. Nagaoka.Methods of Information Geometry. American Math- ematical Society, 2000

    2000

  8. [7]

    Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich

    Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Gigli, and Giuseppe Savaré.Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser, 2008

    2008

Show all 234 references
  1. [8]

    Applebaum

    D. Applebaum. Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2009

    2009

  2. [9]

    L. Arnold. Random Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York, 1998. Corrected 2nd printing, 2003

    1998

  3. [10]

    V. I. Arnold.Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equa- tions. Springer, second edition, 1988

    1988

  4. [11]

    V. I. Arnold.Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics . Springer, second edition, 1989

    1989

  5. [12]

    Arnold and B.A

    V.I. Arnold and B.A. Khesin.Topological methods in hydrodynamics, volume

  6. [13]

    Arnold, V.V

    V.I. Arnold, V.V. Kozlov, and A.I. Neishtadt.Mathematical aspects of classi- cal and celestial mechanics , volume 3. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 3rd edition, 2006. 137 138 References

    2006

  7. [14]

    Probability and Measure Theory

    R.B.Ash. Probability and Measure Theory. AcademicPress,NewYork,second edition, 2000

    2000

  8. [15]

    Ayanbayev, I

    B. Ayanbayev, I. Klebanov, H.C. Lie, and T.J. Sullivan. Γ-convergence of Onsager–Machlup functionals: I. With applications to maximum a posteriori es- timation in Bayesian inverse problems.Inverse Problems, 38, 2021

    2021

  9. [16]

    Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 3(17):21–86, 1900

    L.Bachelier.Théoriedelaspéculation. Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 3(17):21–86, 1900

    1900

  10. [17]

    Nonlocal dispersive optimal transport.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09847, 2024

    Yiming Bai and Abhishek Halder. Nonlocal dispersive optimal transport.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09847, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Rare Transitions in Noisy Heteroclinic Networks, volume 315 ofMemoirs of the American Mathematical Society

    YuriBakhtin,Hong-BinChen,andZsoltPajor-Gyulai. Rare Transitions in Noisy Heteroclinic Networks, volume 315 ofMemoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society, 2026

    2026

  12. [19]

    Asymptotic evaluation of the poisson measures for tubes around jump curves.Applicationes Mathematicae, 29:145–156, 2002

    Xavier Bardina, Carles Rovira, and Samy Tindel. Asymptotic evaluation of the poisson measures for tubes around jump curves.Applicationes Mathematicae, 29:145–156, 2002

    2002

  13. [20]

    F. Baudoin. An Introduction to the Geometry of Stochastic Flows . Imperial College Press, 2004

    2004

  14. [21]

    Berglund and B

    N. Berglund and B. Gentz.Noise-Induced Phenomena in Slow-Fast Dynamical Systems: A Sample-Paths Approach. Springer, New York, 2005

    2005

  15. [22]

    Surlesliaisonsentrelesgrandeursaléatoires

    EugenioBernstein. Surlesliaisonsentrelesgrandeursaléatoires. Verhandlungen des internationalen Mathematikerkongresses, 1:288–309, 1932

    1932

  16. [23]

    Bierkens and H.J

    J. Bierkens and H.J. Kappen. Explicit solution of relative entropy weighted con- trol. Systems & Control Letters, 72:36–43, 2014

    2014

  17. [24]

    Conjugate convex functions in optimal stochastic control

    Jean-Michel Bismut. Conjugate convex functions in optimal stochastic control. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 44(2):384–404, 1973

    1973

  18. [25]

    Bogachev, N.V

    V.I. Bogachev, N.V. Krylov, M. Röckner, and S.V. Shaposhnikov. Fokker– Planck–Kolmogorov equations, volume 207. American Mathematical Society, 2015

    2015

  19. [26]

    Quantum Schrödinger bridge problems

    Denys Bordyuh and Abhishek Halder. Quantum Schrödinger bridge problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01443, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Budd and R

    C. Budd and R. Kuske. Critical noise for advanced dynamic b-tipping in nearly non-smooth stommel-type models. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , page 135055, 2025

    2025

  21. [28]

    The Schrödinger bridge between Gaussian measures has a closed form

    Charlotte Bunne, Ya-Ping Hsieh, Marco Cuturi, and Andreas Krause. The Schrödinger bridge between Gaussian measures has a closed form. InProceed- ings of the 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 5802–5833, 2023

    2023

  22. [29]

    Covariance-modulated optimal transport and gradient flows.arXiv preprint, 2025

    Martin Burger, Matthias Erbar, Franca Hoffmann, Daniel Matthes, and André Schlichting. Covariance-modulated optimal transport and gradient flows.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  23. [30]

    Wassersteinproximalalgorithmsforthe Schrödingerbridgeproblem:Densitycontrolwithnonlineardrift

    KennethF.CaluyaandAbhishekHalder. Wassersteinproximalalgorithmsforthe Schrödingerbridgeproblem:Densitycontrolwithnonlineardrift. arXiv preprint, 2019

    2019

  24. [31]

    Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications I–II,volume83–84of Probability Theory and Stochastic Mod- elling

    RenéCarmonaandFrançoisDelarue. Probabilistic Theory of Mean Field Games with Applications I–II,volume83–84of Probability Theory and Stochastic Mod- elling. Springer, Cham, 2018. References 139

    2018

  25. [32]

    The conditioned Lyapunov spectrum for random dynamical systems.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques, 61(3):1845–1877, August 2025

    M.M.Castro,D.Chemnitz,H.Chu,M.Engel,J.S.W.Lamb,andM.Rasmussen. The conditioned Lyapunov spectrum for random dynamical systems.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques, 61(3):1845–1877, August 2025

    2025

  26. [33]

    Çetin and A

    U. Çetin and A. Danilova. Markov bridges: SDE representation.Stochastic Pro- cesses and their Applications, 126(3):651–679, 2016

    2016

  27. [35]

    Markovianbridges:weakcontinuityandpathwise constructions

    L.ChaumontandG.U.Bravo. Markovianbridges:weakcontinuityandpathwise constructions. The Annals of Probability, 39(2):609–647, 2011

    2011

  28. [36]

    Asufficientconditionforbifurca- tion in random dynamical systems.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 138(3):965–973, March 2010

    XiaopengChen,JinqiaoDuan,andXinchuFu. Asufficientconditionforbifurca- tion in random dynamical systems.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 138(3):965–973, March 2010

    2010

  29. [37]

    Y. Chen, T. Georgiou, and M. Pavon. On the relation between optimal transport and Schrödinger bridges: A stochastic control viewpoint.Journal of Optimiza- tion Theory and Applications, 169:671–691, 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    Optimal transport natural gradient for statistical manifolds with continuous sample space.Information Geometry, 3:1–32, 2020

    Yifan Chen and Wuchen Li. Optimal transport natural gradient for statistical manifolds with continuous sample space.Information Geometry, 3:1–32, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Georgiou, and Michele Pavon

    Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon. Optimal transport in systems and control. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 4:89–113, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Stochasticcontroland the Schrödinger bridge problem: A survey.Annual Reviews in Control, 52:366– 388, 2021

    YongxinChen,TryphonT.Georgiou,andMichelePavon. Stochasticcontroland the Schrödinger bridge problem: A survey.Annual Reviews in Control, 52:366– 388, 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Georgiou, and Michele Pavon

    Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon. Stochastic control liaisons:RichardSinkhornmeetsGaspardMongeonaSchrödingerbridge. SIAM Review, 63(2):249–313, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Georgiou, and Michele Pavon

    Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, and Michele Pavon. The most likely evo- lution of diffusing and vanishing particles: Schrödinger bridges with unbalanced marginals. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,60(4):2016–2039, 2022

    2016

  35. [43]

    Z.-Q. Chen, P. Kim, and R. Song. Heat kernel estimates for Dirichlet fractional Laplacian. J. European Math. Soc., 12:1307–1329, 2010

    2010

  36. [44]

    Information geometry of lévy processes and financial models, 2025

    Jaehyung Choi. Information geometry of lévy processes and financial models, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Informationgeometryofone-dimensionalLévyprocesses

    JaehyungChoi. Informationgeometryofone-dimensionalLévyprocesses. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09889, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Information geometry of tempered stable processes, 2025

    Jaehyung Choi. Information geometry of tempered stable processes, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    Fokker–Planck equa- tions for a free energy functional or Markov process on a graph.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 203(3):969–1008, 2012

    Shui-Nee Chow, Wen Huang, Yao Li, and Haomin Zhou. Fokker–Planck equa- tions for a free energy functional or Markov process on a graph.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 203(3):969–1008, 2012

    2012

  40. [48]

    Wasserstein Hamiltonian flows

    Shui-Nee Chow, Wuchen Li, and Haomin Zhou. Wasserstein Hamiltonian flows. Journal of Differential Equations, 267(2):1256–1289, 2019. arXiv:1903.01088

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Chung and J.-C

    K.L. Chung and J.-C. Zambrini.Introduction to random time and quantum ran- domness, volume 1. World Scientific, new edition, 2003

    2003

  42. [50]

    Julian D. Cole. On a quasi-linear parabolic equation occurring in aerodynamics. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 9(3):225–236, 1951. 140 References

    1951

  43. [51]

    Conforti

    G. Conforti. A second order equation for Schrödinger bridges with applications to the hot gas experiment and entropic transportation cost.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 174(1):1–47, 2019

    2019

  44. [52]

    Some properties of viscosity solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 282(2):487–502, 1984

    Michael G Crandall, Lawrence C Evans, and P-L Lions. Some properties of viscosity solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi equations.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 282(2):487–502, 1984

    1984

  45. [53]

    Crauel and F

    H. Crauel and F. Flandoli. Additive noise destroys a pitchfork bifurcation.J. Dyn. Diff. Eqn., 10:259–274, 1998

    1998

  46. [54]

    Crauel and M

    H. Crauel and M. Gundlach, editors.Stochastic Dynamics. Springer, New York, 1999

    1999

  47. [55]

    Cruzeiro and P.-A

    A.B. Cruzeiro and P.-A. Vuillermot. Forward-backward stochastic differential equations generated by Bernstein diffusions.Stochastic Analysis and Applica- tions, 33(1):91–109, 2015

    2015

  48. [56]

    Cruzeiro and J.-C

    A.B. Cruzeiro and J.-C. Zambrini. Malliavin calculus and Euclidean quantum mechanics. I. Functional calculus.J. Funct. Anal., 96(1):62–95, 1991

    1991

  49. [57]

    Bernsteinprocesses associated with a markov process

    AnaBelaCruzeiro,LimingWu,andJean-ClaudeZambrini. Bernsteinprocesses associated with a markov process. In Stochastic Analysis and Mathematical Physics (ANESTOC ’98), pages 43–61. Birkhäuser, 2000

    2000

  50. [58]

    Sinkhorn distances: lightspeed computation of optimal transport

    Marco Cuturi. Sinkhorn distances: lightspeed computation of optimal transport. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 26, pages 2292– 2300, 2013

    2013

  51. [59]

    A stochastic control approach to reciprocal diffusion processes

    Paolo Dai Pra. A stochastic control approach to reciprocal diffusion processes. Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 23(1):313–329, 1996

    1996

  52. [60]

    Dashti, K.J.H

    M. Dashti, K.J.H. Law, A.M. Stuart, and J. Voss. MAP estimators and their consistency in Bayesian nonparametric inverse problems. Inverse Problems, 29(9):095017, 2013

    2013

  53. [61]

    Diffusion Schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based gener- ative modeling

    Valentin De Bortoli, James Thornton, Jeremy Donat, Sulin Li, and Arnaud Doucet. Diffusion Schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based gener- ative modeling. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, editors,Advances in Neural Inform...

    2021

  54. [62]

    Di Nunno, B

    G. Di Nunno, B. Øksendal, and F. Proskea. White noise analysis for Lévy pro- cesses. Journal of Functional Analysis, 206:109–148, 2004

    2004

  55. [63]

    T. S. Doan, M. Engel, J. Lamb, and M. Rasmussen. Hopf bifurcation with addi- tive noise. Nonlinearity, 31(10), 2018

    2018

  56. [64]

    J.L. Doob. Conditional brownian motion and the boundary limits of harmonic functions. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 85:431–458, 1957

    1957

  57. [65]

    Q. Du, T. Li, X. Li, and W. Ren. The graph limit of the minimizer of the Onsager-Machlup functional and its computation.Science China Mathematics, 64(2):239–280, 2021

    2021

  58. [66]

    Duan.An introduction to stochastic dynamics, volume 51

    J. Duan.An introduction to stochastic dynamics, volume 51. Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2015

    2015

  59. [67]

    TheOnsager-MachlupfunctionasLagrangianforthemost probable path of a diffusion process.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 60(2):153–170, 1978

    D.DürrandA.Bach. TheOnsager-MachlupfunctionasLagrangianforthemost probable path of a diffusion process.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 60(2):153–170, 1978. References 141

    1978

  60. [68]

    R. Durrett. Probability: Theory and Examples. Duxbury Press, Boston, second edition, 1996

    1996

  61. [69]

    Stringmethodforthestudyofrareevents

    W.E,W.Ren,andE.Vanden-Eijnden. Stringmethodforthestudyofrareevents. Physical Review B, 66(5):052301, 2002

    2002

  62. [70]

    W. E, W. Ren, and E. Vanden-Eijnden. Minimum action method for the study of rare events.Communications on pure and applied mathematics, 57(5):637–656, 2004

    2004

  63. [71]

    Transition-paththeoryandpath-findingalgorithms for the study of rare events.Annual review of physical chemistry , 61:391–420, 2010

    W.EandE.Vanden-Eijnden. Transition-paththeoryandpath-findingalgorithms for the study of rare events.Annual review of physical chemistry , 61:391–420, 2010

    2010

  64. [72]

    A generalized Sinkhorn algorithm for mean-field Schrödinger bridge.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2026

    Asmaa Eldesoukey, Yongxin Chen, and Abhishek Halder. A generalized Sinkhorn algorithm for mean-field Schrödinger bridge.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2026

    2026

  65. [73]

    M. Emery. An invitation to second-order stochastic differential geometry.hal- 00145073, 2007

    2007

  66. [74]

    M. Erbar. Gradient flows of the entropy for jump processes.Annales de l’IHP Probabilités et statistiques, 50(3):920–945, 2014

    2014

  67. [75]

    Ricci curvature of finite Markov chains via con- vexityoftheentropy

    Matthias Erbar and Jan Maas. Ricci curvature of finite Markov chains via con- vexityoftheentropy. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis,206(3):997– 1038, 2012

    2012

  68. [76]

    Gradient flow structures for discrete porous medium equations

    Matthias Erbar and Jan Maas. Gradient flow structures for discrete porous medium equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems – Series A , 34(4):1355–1374, 2014

    2014

  69. [77]

    Essid and M

    M. Essid and M. Pavon. Traversing the Schrödinger bridge strait: Robert Fortet’s marvelous proof redux. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 466(2):1548–1564, 2018

    2018

  70. [78]

    Faccioli, M

    P. Faccioli, M. Sega, F. Pederiva, and H. Orland. Dominant pathways in protein folding. Physical Review Letters, 97(10):108101, 2006

    2006

  71. [79]

    S. Fang, P. Imkeller, and T. Zhang. Global flows for stochastic differential equa- tions without global Lipschitz conditions.Ann. Probab., 35(1):180–205, 2007

    2007

  72. [80]

    Nonequilibriumfluctuation relations for non-Gaussian processes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20179, 2025

    ArthurMFaria,MarcusVSBonanca,andEricLutz. Nonequilibriumfluctuation relations for non-Gaussian processes.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20179, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  73. [81]

    C. Feng, H. Zhao, and J. Zhong. Existence of geometric ergodic periodic mea- sures of stochastic differential equations. Journal of Differential Equations , 359:67–106, 2023

    2023

  74. [82]

    Fitzsimmons, J

    P. Fitzsimmons, J. Pitman, and M. Yor. Markovian bridges: construction, palm interpretation, and splicing. In Seminar on Stochastic Processes, 1992 , pages 101–134. Springer, 1993

    1992

  75. [83]

    W. H. Fleming and H. M. Soner.Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions, volume 25. Springer Science & Business Media, 2nd edition, 2006

    2006

  76. [84]

    Sur la résolution d’un système d’équations intégrales.Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 210:198–200, 1940

    Robert Fortet. Sur la résolution d’un système d’équations intégrales.Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 210:198–200, 1940

    1940

  77. [85]

    Fujiwara

    A. Fujiwara. A review of Chentsov’s theorem on invariance.Information Ge- ometry, 7:79–98, 2023. 142 References

    2023

  78. [86]

    TransitionpaththeoryforLangevindynamics on manifolds: Optimal control and data-driven solver.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 21(1):1–33, 2023

    Y.Gao,T.Li,X.Li,andJ.-G.Liu. TransitionpaththeoryforLangevindynamics on manifolds: Optimal control and data-driven solver.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 21(1):1–33, 2023

    2023

  79. [87]

    Garbaczewski, J

    P. Garbaczewski, J. Klauder, and R. Olkiewicz. Schrödinger problem, Lévy processes, and noise in relativistic quantum mechanics. Physical Review E , 51(5):4114, 1995

    1995

  80. [88]

    OntheOnsager-Machlupfunctionalofthe 𝜑4-measure

    I.GasteratosandZ.Selk. OntheOnsager-Machlupfunctionalofthe 𝜑4-measure. Journal of Statistical Physics, 193(4):45, 2026

    2026

  81. [89]

    Gentil, C

    I. Gentil, C. Léonard, and L. Ripani. Dynamical aspects of generalized Schrödinger problem via Otto calculus – a heuristic point of view. Revista Matemática Iberoamericana, 36(4):1071–1112, 2020

    2020

  82. [90]

    T. T. Georgiou and M. Pavon. Positive contraction mappings for classical and quantum Schrödinger systems.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 56(3):033301, 2015

    2015

  83. [91]

    Ghosal, M

    P. Ghosal, M. Nutz, and E. Bernton. Stability of entropic optimal transport and schrödinger bridges. Journal of Functional Analysis, 283(10):109677, 2022

    2022

  84. [92]

    Second Order Analysis on ¹P2¹𝑀º,𝑊 2º, volume 216, no

    Nicola Gigli. Second Order Analysis on ¹P2¹𝑀º,𝑊 2º, volume 216, no. 1018 of Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society . American Mathematical Soci- ety, 2012

    2012

  85. [93]

    Gromov–Hausdorff convergence of discrete trans- portation metrics

    Nicola Gigli and Jan Maas. Gromov–Hausdorff convergence of discrete trans- portation metrics. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 45(2):879–899, 2013

    2013

  86. [94]

    Gobbo, A

    G. Gobbo, A. Laio, A. Maleki, and S. Baroni. Absolute transition rates for rare eventsfromdynamicaldecouplingofreactionvariables. Physical Review Letters, 109(15):150601, 2012

    2012

  87. [95]

    Goldstein, C

    H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko.Classical mechanics. Pearson Education, 3rd edition, 2002

    2002

  88. [96]

    Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Sys- tems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields

    JohnGuckenheimerandPhilipHolmes. Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Sys- tems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer, 1983

    1983

  89. [97]

    Light and optimal Schrödinger bridge matching

    NikitaGushchin,SergeiKholkin,EvgenyBurnaev,andAlexanderKorotin. Light and optimal Schrödinger bridge matching. InProceedings of the 41st Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

    2024

  90. [98]

    Mattingly, and Michael Scheutzow

    Martin Hairer, Jonathan C. Mattingly, and Michael Scheutzow. Asymptotic cou- pling and a weak form of Harris’ theorem with applications to stochastic delay equations. The Annals of Applied Probability, 21(1):154–196, 2011

    2011

  91. [99]

    Darryl D. Holm. Geometric Mechanics - Part I: Dynamics and Symmetry . Im- perial College Press, 2nd edition, 2011

    2011

  92. [100]

    The partial differential equation𝑢𝑡 ¸𝑢𝑢𝑥 =𝜇𝑢𝑥𝑥

    Eberhard Hopf. The partial differential equation𝑢𝑡 ¸𝑢𝑢𝑥 =𝜇𝑢𝑥𝑥. Communica- tions on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 3(3):201–230, 1950

    1950

  93. [101]

    Huang and J.-C

    Q. Huang and J.-C. Zambrini. From second-order differential geometry to stochastic geometric mechanics.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 33(4):67, 2023

    2023

  94. [102]

    Stochasticgeometricmechanicsinnonequilibrium thermodynamics: Schrödinger meets Onsager.Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical, 56(13):134003, 2023

    Q.HuangandJ.-C.Zambrini. Stochasticgeometricmechanicsinnonequilibrium thermodynamics: Schrödinger meets Onsager.Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and Theoretical, 56(13):134003, 2023. References 143

    2023

  95. [103]

    Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellmanequationsin stochasticgeometricmechanics

    QiaoHuangandJean-ClaudeZambrini. Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellmanequationsin stochasticgeometricmechanics. In Physical Sciences Forum,volume5,page37. MDPI, 2022

    2022

  96. [104]

    Stochastic maupertuis’s principles and jacobi’s integration theorem

    Qiao Huang and Jean-Claude Zambrini. Stochastic maupertuis’s principles and jacobi’s integration theorem. InInternational Conference on Geometric Science of Information, pages 406–415. Springer, 2025

    2025

  97. [105]

    Dynamical complexity of Anosov sys- tems driven by a quasi-periodic force.Science China Mathematics , 68(1):89– 136, 2025

    Wen Huang, Zeng Lian, and Kening Lu. Dynamical complexity of Anosov sys- tems driven by a quasi-periodic force.Science China Mathematics , 68(1):89– 136, 2025

    2025

  98. [106]

    Estimatingthemostprobabletransition time for stochastic dynamical systems.Nonlinearity, 34(7):4543–4569, 2021

    Y.Huang,Y.Chao,W.Wei,andJ.Duan. Estimatingthemostprobabletransition time for stochastic dynamical systems.Nonlinearity, 34(7):4543–4569, 2021

    2021

  99. [107]

    Huang, Y

    Y. Huang, Y. Chao, S. Yuan, and J. Duan. Characterization of the most probable transition paths of stochastic dynamical systems with stable Lévy noise.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , 2019(6):063204, 2019

    2019

  100. [108]

    Themostprobabletransitionpathsofstochas- tic dynamical systems: a sufficient and necessary characterisation.Nonlinearity, 37(1):015010, 2024

    Y.Huang,Q.Huang,andJ.Duan. Themostprobabletransitionpathsofstochas- tic dynamical systems: a sufficient and necessary characterisation.Nonlinearity, 37(1):015010, 2024

    2024

  101. [109]

    Huang, C

    Y. Huang, C. Liu, B. Miao, and X. Zhou. Entropy production in non-Gaussian activematter:Aunifiedfluctuationtheoremanddeeplearningframework. Phys- ical Review Letters, 136(6):068302, 2026

    2026

  102. [110]

    Huang, X

    Y. Huang, X. Zhou, and J. Duan. Probability flow approach to the Onsager– Machlup functional for jump-diffusion processes. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 85(2):524–547, 2025

    2025

  103. [111]

    Huang and Z

    Y. Huang and Z. Zhou. Transition path theory for Lévy-type processes: SDE representation and statistics.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 36(2):36, 2026

    2026

  104. [112]

    Lévy score function and score- based particle algorithm for nonlinear Lévy–Fokker–Planck equations.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 62(4):1645–1672, 2024

    Yuanfei Huang, Chengyu Liu, and Xiang Zhou. Lévy score function and score- based particle algorithm for nonlinear Lévy–Fokker–Planck equations.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 62(4):1645–1672, 2024

    2024

  105. [113]

    Z. Huang. Foundation of Stochastic Analysis (in Chinese) . Science Press, Bei- jing, second edition, 2001

    2001

  106. [114]

    Anonlocaltransportmetricforstationary point processes

    MartinHuesmannandBastianStange. Anonlocaltransportmetricforstationary point processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01234, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Hunt and J

    K.L.C. Hunt and J. Ross. Path integral solutions of stochastic equations for non- linear irreversible processes: The uniqueness of the thermodynamic Lagrangian. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 75(2):976–984, 1981

    1981

  108. [116]

    Ikeda and S

    N. Ikeda and S. Watanabe.Stochastic differential equations and diffusion pro- cesses, volume 24. North-Holland Publishing Company, 2nd edition, 1989

    1989

  109. [117]

    First exit times of SDEs driven by stable Lévy processes

    Peter Imkeller and Ilya Pavlyukevich. First exit times of SDEs driven by stable Lévy processes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 116(4):611–642, 2006

    2006

  110. [118]

    B.Jamison.TheMarkovprocessesofSchrödinger. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete, 32(4):323–331, 1975

    1975

  111. [119]

    Janicki and A

    A. Janicki and A. Weron.Simulation and Chaotic Behavior of𝛼-Stable Stochas- tic Processes. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994

    1994

  112. [120]

    Variationalinferenceonpathspaceasamulti-marginalSchrödinger bridge

    YifanJiang. Variationalinferenceonpathspaceasamulti-marginalSchrödinger bridge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.07891, 2026. 144 References

    2026

  113. [121]

    The variational formula- tion of the Fokker–Planck equation.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 29(1):1–17, 1998

    Richard Jordan, David Kinderlehrer, and Felix Otto. The variational formula- tion of the Fokker–Planck equation.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 29(1):1–17, 1998

    1998

  114. [122]

    Kalise and W

    D. Kalise and W. Liu. A PDE-constrained optimization approach to optimal trajectory planning under uncertainty via reflected Schrödinger bridges.arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  115. [123]

    Kappler and R

    J. Kappler and R. Adhikari. Stochastic action for tubes: Connecting path proba- bilities to measurement.Physical Review Research, 2(2):023407, 2020

    2020

  116. [124]

    Karatzas, W

    I. Karatzas, W. Schachermayer, and B. Tschiderer. Trajectorial Otto calculus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08686, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Springer Nature Switzerland, 2nd edition, 2021

    2021

  118. [126]

    Brownian motion and stochastic calculus,volume113

    I.KaratzasandS.Shreve. Brownian motion and stochastic calculus,volume113. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 1991

    1991

  119. [127]

    Karatzas and S

    I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve. Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus . Springer, New York, second edition, 1991

    1991

  120. [128]

    Khandekar, S.V

    D.C. Khandekar, S.V. Lawande, and K.V. Bhagwat.Path integral methods and their applications. World Scientific Publishing, 1993

    1993

  121. [129]

    Khesin, G

    B. Khesin, G. Misiołek, and K. Modin. Geometric hydrodynamics and infinite- dimensionalNewton’sequations. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 58(3):377–442, 2021

    2021

  122. [130]

    F. C. Klebaner.Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications. Imperial College Press, London, second edition, 2005

    2005

  123. [131]

    P. E. Kloeden and E. Platen.Numerical solution of stochastic differential equa- tions. Springer, New York, 1992. Second corrected printing, 1995

    1992

  124. [132]

    Peter E. Kloeden. Stochastic differential equations. InInternational Encyclope- dia of Statistical Science, pages 2670–2672. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2025

    2025

  125. [133]

    A mathematical framework for critical transitions: Normal forms, variance and applications.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 23(3):457–510, 2013

    Christian Kuehn. A mathematical framework for critical transitions: Normal forms, variance and applications.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 23(3):457–510, 2013

    2013

  126. [134]

    H. Kunita. Stochastic Flows and Stochastic Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990

    1990

  127. [135]

    H.-H. Kuo. Introduction to Stochastic Integration. Springer, New York, 2006

    2006

  128. [136]

    Gaussian measures in banach spaces

    Hui-Hsiung Kuo. Gaussian measures in banach spaces. InGaussian measures in banach spaces, pages 1–109. Springer, 2006

    2006

  129. [137]

    Kuske and J

    R. Kuske and J. B. Keller. Rate of convergence to a stable law.SIAM J. Appl. Math., 61(4):1308–1323, 2001

    2001

  130. [138]

    Lassalle and J.-C

    R. Lassalle and J.-C. Zambrini. A weak approach to the stochastic deformation of classical mechanics.Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 8(2):221, 2016

    2016

  131. [139]

    Lázaro-Camí and J.-P

    J.-A. Lázaro-Camí and J.-P. Ortega. Stochastic Hamiltonian dynamical systems. Report on Mathematical Physics, 61(1):65–122, 2008

    2008

  132. [140]

    Lázaro-Camí and J.-P

    J.-A. Lázaro-Camí and J.-P. Ortega. The stochastic Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 1(3):295, 2009

    2009

  133. [141]

    Stochasticflowsofdiffeomorphisms

    Y.LeJanandS.Watanabe. Stochasticflowsofdiffeomorphisms. InK.Itô,editor, Stochastic Analysis (Proc. of the Taniguchi Symposium 1982) , pages 307–332. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1984

    1982

  134. [142]

    Lee and H.-H

    Y.-J. Lee and H.-H. Shih. Analysis of generalized Lévy white noise functionals. Journal of Functional Analysis, 211:1–70, 2004. References 145

    2004

  135. [143]

    C. Léonard. Girsanov theory under a finite entropy condition. InSéminaire de Probabilités XLIV, pages 429–465. Springer, 2012

    2012

  136. [144]

    C. Léonard. A survey of the Schrödinger problem and some of its connec- tions with optimal transport. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A , 34(4):1533–1574, 2014

    2014

  137. [145]

    Léonard, S

    C. Léonard, S. Rœlly, and J.-C. Zambrini. Reciprocal processes: A measure- theoretical point of view.Probability Surveys, 11:237–269, 2014

    2014

  138. [146]

    Multiscale nonlocal-in-time Schrödinger bridges and time-fractional mean-field control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04321, 2025

    Qi Li and Xiaofan Zhou. Multiscale nonlocal-in-time Schrödinger bridges and time-fractional mean-field control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04321, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Li and X

    T. Li and X. Li. Gamma-limit of the Onsager–Machlup functional on the space of curves. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 53(1):1–31, 2021

    2021

  140. [148]

    W. Li. Hessian metric via transport information geometry.Journal of Mathe- matical Physics, 62(3):033301, 2021. arXiv:2003.10526

    2021 arXiv

  141. [149]

    W. Li. Transport information bregman divergences. Information Geometry, 4:435–470, 2021

    2021

  142. [150]

    W. Li. Transport information Bregman divergences. Information Geometry, 4(2):435–470, 2021. arXiv:2101.00687

    2021 arXiv

  143. [151]

    W. Li. Exact solutions to the quantum Schrödinger bridge problem. arXiv preprint, 2025. Forthcoming

    2025

  144. [152]

    Sternberg theorems for random dynamical systems

    Weigu Li and Kening Lu. Sternberg theorems for random dynamical systems. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2005

    2005

  145. [153]

    Rotation numbers for random dynamical systems on the circle

    Weigu Li and Kening Lu. Rotation numbers for random dynamical systems on the circle. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 360(10):5509– 5528, October 2008

    2008

  146. [154]

    Transport information geometry: Riemannian calculus on probabil- ity simplex

    Wuchen Li. Transport information geometry: Riemannian calculus on probabil- ity simplex. Information Geometry, 5(1):161–207, 2022

    2022

  147. [155]

    Natural gradient via optimal transport.Infor- mation Geometry, 1:181–214, 2018

    Wuchen Li and Guido Montúfar. Natural gradient via optimal transport.Infor- mation Geometry, 1:181–214, 2018

    2018

  148. [156]

    Ricci curvature for parametric statistics via optimal transport

    Wuchen Li and Guido Montúfar. Ricci curvature for parametric statistics via optimal transport. Information Geometry, 3:89–117, 2020

    2020

  149. [157]

    Coarse extrinsic curvature via optimal transport

    Xue-Mei Li. Coarse extrinsic curvature via optimal transport. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01251, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Machine learning framework for com- putingthemostprobablepathsofstochasticdynamicalsystems

    Yang Li, Jinqiao Duan, and Xianbin Liu. Machine learning framework for com- putingthemostprobablepathsofstochasticdynamicalsystems. Physical Review E, 103(1):012124, January 2021

    2021

  151. [159]

    Conley index for random dynamical systems.Journal of Differen- tial Equations, 244(7):1603–1628, 2008

    Zhenxin Liu. Conley index for random dynamical systems.Journal of Differen- tial Equations, 244(7):1603–1628, 2008

    2008

  152. [160]

    Some geometric calculations on Wasserstein space.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 277(2):423–437, 2008

    John Lott. Some geometric calculations on Wasserstein space.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 277(2):423–437, 2008

    2008

  153. [161]

    Y. Lu, A. Stuart, and H. Weber. Gaussian approximations for transition paths in Brownian dynamics. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 49(4):3005– 3047, 2017

    2017

  154. [162]

    Lévy noise versus gaussian-noise-induced transitions in the ghil–sellers energy balance model

    Valerio Lucarini, Larissa Serdukova, and Georgios Margazoglou. Lévy noise versus gaussian-noise-induced transitions in the ghil–sellers energy balance model. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 29(2):183–205, 2022. 146 References

    2022

  155. [163]

    Léger and W

    F. Léger and W. Li. Hopf–Cole transformation via generalized Schrödinger bridge problem. Journal of Differential Equations , 274:788–827, 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09051 (2019)

    2021 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Gradient flows of the entropy for finite Markov chains.Journal of Functional Analysis, 261(8):2250–2292, 2011

    Jan Maas. Gradient flows of the entropy for finite Markov chains.Journal of Functional Analysis, 261(8):2250–2292, 2011

    2011

  157. [165]

    Machlup and L

    S. Machlup and L. Onsager. Fluctuations and irreversible processes. II. Systems with kinetic energy.Physical Review, 91(6):1512–1515, 1953

    1953

  158. [166]

    A gradient structure for reaction–diffusion systems and for energy-drift-diffusion systems

    Alexander Mielke. A gradient structure for reaction–diffusion systems and for energy-drift-diffusion systems. Nonlinearity, 24(4):1329–1346, 2011

    2011

  159. [167]

    T. Mikami. Stochastic Optimal Transportation: Stochastic Control with Fixed Marginals. Springer Nature, 2021

    2021

  160. [168]

    T. Mikosch. Elementary Stochastic Calculus with Finance in View . World Sci- entific, New Jersey, 1998

    1998

  161. [169]

    Geometry of the Sinkhorn algorithm as alternating information projections

    Klas Modin. Geometry of the Sinkhorn algorithm as alternating information projections. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04987, 2024

    2024

  162. [170]

    Mörters and Y

    P. Mörters and Y. Peres.Brownian Motion. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2010

    2010

  163. [171]

    E. Nelson. Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion . Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, second edition, 2001

    2001

  164. [172]

    Øksendal

    B. Øksendal. Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer, New York, sixth edi- tion, 2003

    2003

  165. [173]

    Øksendal

    B. Øksendal. Applied Stochastic Control Of Jump Diffusions . Springer, New York, third edition, 2019

    2019

  166. [174]

    Onsager and S

    L. Onsager and S. Machlup. Fluctuations and irreversible processes.Physical Review, 91(6):1505–1512, 1953

    1953

  167. [175]

    H. Orland. Markov bridges and Brownian bridges: a statistical physics approach. Physical Review E, 110:044105, 2024

    2024

  168. [176]

    H. Orland. Feynman path integrals for Schrödinger bridges and applications. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 58:125001, 2025

    2025

  169. [177]

    F. Otto. The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the porous medium equation. Communications in Partial Differential Equations , 26(1-2):101–174, 2001

    2001

  170. [178]

    Springer, 1982

    Jacob Palis and Welington Melo.Geometric Theory of Dynamical Systems: An Introduction. Springer, 1982

    1982

  171. [179]

    Pardoux and S

    E. Pardoux and S. Peng. Adapted solution of backward stochastic equations. Systems & Control Letters, 14:55–61, 1990

    1990

  172. [180]

    Poincaré-birkhoff theorems in random dynamics

    Álvaro Pelayo and Fraydoun Rezakhanlou. Poincaré-birkhoff theorems in random dynamics. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 370(1):601–639, 2018

    2018

  173. [181]

    Peletier, Riccarda Rossi, Giuseppe Savaré, and Oliver Tse

    Mark A. Peletier, Riccarda Rossi, Giuseppe Savaré, and Oliver Tse. Jump pro- cesses as generalized gradient flows.Calculus of Variations and Partial Differ- ential Equations, 61(1):85, 2022. Paper No. 33, 85 p

    2022

  174. [182]

    Stochastic Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 30(2):284–304, 1992

    Shige Peng. Stochastic Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 30(2):284–304, 1992. References 147

    1992

  175. [183]

    Peyré, L

    G. Peyré, L. Chizat, F.-X. Vialard, and J. Solomon. Quantum entropic regular- ization of matrix-valued optimal transport.European Journal of Applied Math- ematics, 30(6):1079–1102, 2019

    2019

  176. [184]

    Pinski, A.M

    F.J. Pinski, A.M. Stuart, and F. Theil.Γ-limit for transition paths of maximal probability. Journal of Statistical Physics, 146(5):955–974, 2012

    2012

  177. [185]

    D. Pollard. Convergence of stochastic processes. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  178. [186]

    Privault and J.-C

    N. Privault and J.-C. Zambrini. Markovian bridges and reversible diffusion pro- cesseswithjumps. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré (B) Probabilités et Statis- tiques, 40(5):599–633, 2004

    2004

  179. [187]

    Revuz and M

    D. Revuz and M. Yor.Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion. Springer, New York, third edition, 2005

    2005

  180. [188]

    Samorodnitsky and M

    G. Samorodnitsky and M. S. Taqqu.Stable Non-Gaussian Random Processes . Chapman and Hall, New York, 1994

    1994

  181. [189]

    K.-I. Sato. Lévy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999

    1999

  182. [190]

    Wassersteingeometryandriccicurvature bounds for poisson spaces.arXiv preprint, 2023

    D.L.Schiavo,R.Herry,andK.Suzuki. Wassersteingeometryandriccicurvature bounds for poisson spaces.arXiv preprint, 2023

    2023

  183. [191]

    Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze

    Erwin Schrödinger. Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, pages 144–153, 1931

    1931

  184. [192]

    Surlathéorierelativistedel’électronetl’interprétationdela mécaniquequantique

    ErwinSchrödinger. Surlathéorierelativistedel’électronetl’interprétationdela mécaniquequantique. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré,2(4):269–310,1932

    1932

  185. [193]

    Schulman

    L.S. Schulman. Techniques and applications of path integration . Dover Publi- cations, Inc., 2005

    2005

  186. [194]

    Z. Selk. Reweighting metric measure spaces and Onsager-Machlup. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10591, 2025

    2025

  187. [195]

    InformationprojectiononBanachspaces with applications to state independent KL-weighted optimal control.Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 84(1):805–835, 2021

    Z.Selk,W.Haskell,andH.Honnappa. InformationprojectiononBanachspaces with applications to state independent KL-weighted optimal control.Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 84(1):805–835, 2021

    2021

  188. [196]

    Selk and H

    Z. Selk and H. Honnappa. A Feynman-Kac type theorem for ODEs: Solutions of second order ODEs as modes of diffusions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08525, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  189. [197]

    Selk and H

    Z. Selk and H. Honnappa. The small-noise limit of the most likely element is the most likely element in the small-noise limit.ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probabil. Math. Stat., 21:849–862, 2024

    2024

  190. [198]

    Serdukova, Y

    L. Serdukova, Y. Zheng, J. Duan, and J. Kurths. Stochastic basins of attraction for metastable states.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 26(7):073111, 2016

    2016

  191. [199]

    Shao and C

    M. Shao and C. L. Nikias. Signal processing with fractional lower order mo- ments: Stable processes and their applications.Proc. of the IEEE , 81(7):986– 1010, 1993

    1993

  192. [200]

    H.-H. Shih. The Segal-Bargmann transform for Lévy white noise functionals associated with non-integrable Lévy processes.Journal of Functional Analysis, 255(3):657–680, 2008. 148 References

    2008

  193. [201]

    Arelationshipbetweenarbitrarypositivematricesanddoubly stochasticmatrices

    RichardSinkhorn. Arelationshipbetweenarbitrarypositivematricesanddoubly stochasticmatrices. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics,38(3):907–910,1967

    1967

  194. [202]

    NonlocalWassersteindistance:metricandasymptotic properties

    D.SlepčevandA.Warren. NonlocalWassersteindistance:metricandasymptotic properties. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations , 62:238, 2023

    2023

  195. [203]

    Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Ste- fanoErmon,andBenPoole

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Ste- fanoErmon,andBenPoole. Score-basedgenerativemodelingthroughstochastic differentialequations. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  196. [204]

    S.M. Soskin. Most probable transition path in an overdamped system for a finite transition time. Physics Letters A, 353(4):281–290, 2006

    2006

  197. [205]

    Randomperturbationsofheteroclinicattractors

    EmilyStoneandPhilipHolmes. Randomperturbationsofheteroclinicattractors. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 50(3):726–743, June 1990

    1990

  198. [206]

    Sun and J

    X. Sun and J. Duan. Fokker-Planck equations for nonlinear dynamical systems driven by non-Gaussian Lévy processes.J. Math. Phys., 53:072701, 2012

    2012

  199. [207]

    OntheHopf–Coletransformforcontrol-affine Schrödinger bridge

    AlexisTeterandAbhishekHalder. OntheHopf–Coletransformforcontrol-affine Schrödinger bridge. arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  200. [208]

    Alexis M. H. Teter and Abhishek Halder. Weyl calculus and exactly solv- able Schrödinger bridges with quadratic state cost, 2024. arXiv:2407.15688 [math.OC]

    2024 arXiv

  201. [209]

    Riemannian diffusion Schrödinger bridge

    James Thornton, Valentin De Bortoli, Michael Hutchinson, Emile Mathieu, Yee Whye Teh, and Arnaud Doucet. Riemannian diffusion Schrödinger bridge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.03024, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  202. [210]

    Fluctuationsandirreversiblethermodynamics

    L.TiszaandI.Manning. Fluctuationsandirreversiblethermodynamics. Physical Review, 105(6):1695, 1957

    1957

  203. [211]

    C. Villani. Optimal Transport: Old and New , volume 338 ofGrundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer-Verlag, 2009

    2009

  204. [212]

    AnoptimaltransportviewofSchrödinger’sequation

    M.-K.vonRenesse. AnoptimaltransportviewofSchrödinger’sequation. Cana- dian mathematical bulletin, 55(4):858–869, 2012

    2012

  205. [213]

    J. Wang, K. Zhang, H. Lu, and E. Wang. Dominant kinetic paths on biomolecu- lar binding-folding energy landscape.Physical Review Letters, 96(16):168101, 2006

    2006

  206. [214]

    Y. Wang, T. Gao, and J. Duan. Beyond Distance: Quantifying Point Cloud Dy- namics with Persistent Homology and Dynamic Optimal Transport.Philosoph- ical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2026. Accepted

    2026

  207. [215]

    Accelerated information gradient flow.Journal of Scientific Computing, 90(1):11, 2022

    Yifei Wang and Wuchen Li. Accelerated information gradient flow.Journal of Scientific Computing, 90(1):11, 2022

    2022

  208. [216]

    An optimal control method to compute the most likely transition path for stochastic dynamical sys- tems with jumps

    Wei Wei, Ting Gao, Xiaopeng Chen, and Jinqiao Duan. An optimal control method to compute the most likely transition path for stochastic dynamical sys- tems with jumps. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 32(5):053120, May 2022

    2022

  209. [217]

    Wiegel.Introduction to path-integral methods in physics and polymer sci- ence

    F.W. Wiegel.Introduction to path-integral methods in physics and polymer sci- ence. World Scientific Publishing, 1986

    1986

  210. [218]

    S. Wiggins. Chaotic Transport in Dynamical Systems. Springer, 1992

    1992

  211. [219]

    S. Wiggins. Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos . Springer, New York, second edition, 2003. References 149

    2003

  212. [220]

    Wiggins, Víctor J

    S. Wiggins, Víctor J. García-Garrido, and Matthaios Katsanikas.Phase Space Structures in Reaction Dynamics: A Dynamical Systems Approach . Springer, 2025

    2025

  213. [221]

    H.S. Wio. Path integrals for stochastic processes: An introduction. World Sci- entific Publishing, 2013

    2013

  214. [222]

    Xi and C

    F. Xi and C. Zhu. Jump type stochastic differential equations with non-Lipschitz coefficients: non-confluence, Fellerand strongFellerproperties, and exponential ergodicity. Journal of Differential Equations, 266(8):4668–4711, 2019

    2019

  215. [223]

    Early warning prediction: Onsager-Machlup vs Schrodinger

    Xiaoai Xu, Yixuan Zhou, Xiang Clarance Zhou, Jinqiao Duan, and Ting Gao. Early warning prediction: Onsager-Machlup vs Schrodinger. Stochastics and Dynamics, 26(5):2650011, 2026

    2026

  216. [224]

    Most probable transition paths versus Schrödingerbridgesasearly-warningindicatorsunderLévynoise

    Yong Xu, Qi Liu, and Jürgen Kurths. Most probable transition paths versus Schrödingerbridgesasearly-warningindicatorsunderLévynoise. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03456, 2026

    2026

  217. [225]

    Zambrini

    J.-C. Zambrini. The research program of stochastic deformation (with a view toward geometric mechanics). InStochastic analysis: a series of lectures , vol- ume 68 ofProgress in Probability, pages 359–393. Springer Basel, 2015

    2015

  218. [226]

    Zeitouni

    O. Zeitouni. On the Onsager-Machlup functional of diffusion processes around non𝐶2 curves. The Annals of Probability, 17(3):1037–1054, 1989

    1989

  219. [227]

    Zeitouni and A

    O. Zeitouni and A. Dembo. A maximum a posteriori estimator for trajectories of diffusion processes.Stochastics: An International Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 20(3):221–246, 1987

    1987

  220. [228]

    Zeitouni and A

    O. Zeitouni and A. Dembo. An existence theorem and some properties of maxi- mum a posteriori estimators of trajectories of diffusions.Stochastics: An Inter- national Journal of Probability and Stochastic Processes, 23(2):197–218, 1988

    1988

  221. [229]

    Action functional as an early warning indicator in the space of probability measures via Schrödinger bridge

    Peng Zhang, Ting Goldie Gao, Jin Guo, and Jinqiao Duan. Action functional as an early warning indicator in the space of probability measures via Schrödinger bridge. Quantitative Biology, 13(1):e86, March 2025

    2025

  222. [230]

    Action-functional early-warning indicators for noise-induced transitions

    Wei Zhang and Xianbin Chen. Action-functional early-warning indicators for noise-induced transitions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05678, 2025

    2025

  223. [231]

    Randomperiodicsolutionsofrandomdynamicalsystems

    H.ZhaoandZ.Zheng. Randomperiodicsolutionsofrandomdynamicalsystems. J. of Differential Equations, 246:2020–2038, 2009

    2020

  224. [232]

    Zlotchevski and L

    A. Zlotchevski and L. Chen. Schrödinger Bridge Problem for Jump Diffusions. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2411.13765, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  225. [233]

    Schrödinger bridges for regime-switching jump diffusions

    Andrei Zlotchevski and Linan Chen. Schrödinger bridges for regime-switching jump diffusions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12456, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  226. [234]

    Zuckerman and T.B

    D.M. Zuckerman and T.B. Woolf. Efficient dynamic importance sampling of rare events in one dimension.Physical Review E, 63(1):016702, 2000

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.