Pith. sign in

REVIEW

CLEAR: A Semantic-Geometric Terrain Abstraction for Large-Scale Unstructured Environments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2601.13361 v2 pith:54B3XDJD submitted 2026-01-19 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords terrainclearpercentplanningabstractionkilometerssquarecost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Long-horizon navigation in unstructured environments demands terrain abstractions that scale to tens of square kilometers while preserving semantic and geometric structure. Grids scale poorly, and quadtrees misalign with terrain boundaries. Neither encodes terrain semantics essential for traversability-aware planning, yielding infeasible or inefficient paths for autonomous ground vehicles operating over more than 10 square kilometers. CLEAR (Connected Landcover Elevation Abstract Representation) is a reusable terrain abstraction framework for large-scale planning that produces convex, semantically aligned regions encoded as a terrain-aware graph. Evaluated on digital terrain maps spanning 9 to 100 square kilometers with physics-based simulation, CLEAR reduces per-query planning by 2x to 19.6x over unabstracted raw-grid A-star after one-time abstraction, with 6.7 percent cost overhead. In physics-based simulation, CLEAR delivers 5 to 8.6 percent shorter executed paths and 100 percent task completion across all maps, compared with 90 to 100 percent for Quadtree. These results hold against AMRA-star, a strong anytime multi-resolution planner, and generalize to a learned elevation-driven cost, demonstrating CLEAR's scalability and cost-model independence as a reusable planning layer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools