Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Hessian operators, overdetermined problems, and higher order mean curvatures: symmetry and stability results

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A small boundary deviation of the gradient in a k-Hessian torsion problem forces the domain to be quantitatively close to a ball, with explicit dimension-dependent rates.

desk verdict A solid, refereeable extension of quantitative Serrin/soap-bubble stability to all k-Hessian operators, with only minor presentational gaps around k=1 and the convexity scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23350 v1 pith:54IOPWLH submitted 2025-05-29 math.AP

Nunzia Gavitone , Alba Lia Masiello , Gloria Paoli , Giorgio Poggesi This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35N2553A1035G2035B3535A23
keywords Hessianoperatorsk-HessianequationSerrinoverdeterminedproblemAlexandrovsoapbubbletheoremhigherordermeancurvaturequantitativestabilityP-functionradialsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the classical Serrin–Alexandrov rigidity phenomenon to all k-Hessian operators and all higher-order mean curvatures. Its central result is quantitative: if a solution of the k-Hessian torsion problem has boundary gradient almost constant, with deviation δ, then the distance between the largest and smallest radii of the domain around a natural center is controlled by explicit powers of δ—$δ^{{1/2}}$ for n=2, $δ^{{1/2}}$ log(1/$δ^{{1/2}}$) for n=3, and $δ^{{1/(n-1)}}$ for n≥4. The same machinery gives new proofs of the known symmetry theorems, new equivalences between boundary curvature conditions and sphericity, and stability estimates for boundaries whose k-th mean curvature is almost constant, including a bubbling statement that such boundaries are quantitatively close to disjoint unions of equal balls. These results matter because they show that the deep link between overdetermined elliptic problems and the soap-bubble theorem is not an accident of the Laplacian but a structural feature of the whole Hessian hierarchy.

What carries the argument

The engine is the P-function P = |∇u|²/2 − u, built from the solution u of the k-Hessian problem. The k-Hessian operator S_k(D²u) is the k-th elementary symmetric function of the Hessian eigenvalues—the Laplacian for k=1 and the Monge–Ampère operator for k=n—and its linearization L satisfies L[P] ≥ 0, with equality if and only if Ω is a ball and u is the radial paraboloid, making L[P] a 'spherical detector.' Around this, the proof constructs h = q − u with q = |x−z|²/2, derives a fundamental integral identity (4.2) that balances boundary curvature and gradient deviations against nonnegative interior terms, and uses Newton's inequalities, the Pohožaev identity, Minkowski's identity, and weighted Sobolev–Poincaré plus interpolation inequalities to convert L[P] and Hessian information into the explicit radial gap estimates.

What would settle it

Take a family of analytic perturbations of the unit ball, solve (1.3) numerically or by asymptotic expansion, and measure the boundary gradient deviation δ and the radial gap ρ_e−ρ_i; Theorem 1.1 predicts ρ_e−ρ_i ≤ C $δ^{{1/2}}$ for n=2 with C independent of the perturbation as δ→0. If any sequence yields a ratio (ρ_e−ρ_i)/$δ^{{1/2}}$ → ∞, the theorem's rate is wrong; the same experiment at k=1 on elongated near-circular ellipses is a direct check of the Laplacian case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a family of quantitative rigidity results for the k-Hessian Dirichlet problem and for constant higher-order mean curvature boundaries. Theorem 1.1 states that whenever u∈C²(Ω) solves S_k(D²u)=binom(n,k) in Ω and u=0 on ∂Ω, the L∞ deviation δ = || |∇u| − R ||_{L∞(∂Ω)} of the boundary gradient from its average R controls the radial gap ρ_e − ρ_i with the dimension-dependent rates above, with constants depending only on n, the interior sphere radius, and the diameter. Theorem 1.2 proves that sphericity is equivalent, under this solution, to each of: constant |∇u| on the boundary; H_k ≥ 1/R^k on the boundary; H_k ≥ 1/ˆR^k on the boundary; |∇u|^k H_k ≥ 1 on the boundary; and |∇u| = ⟨x,ν⟩ on the boundary. Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 then give stability for almost constant k-mean curvature with weak L1-type deficits, with Theorem 1.4 allowing bubbling: near-critical domains are quantitatively close, in volume and Hausdorff distance, to a finite union of disjoint balls of equal radii.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a C² solution to the k-Hessian Dirichlet problem exists on the domain; for k≥2 this silently requires the domain to be strictly (k−1)-convex, so the stability statement is vacuous rather than false for domains that admit no such solution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every k from 1 to n, a small boundary deviation δ in the gradient forces the domain to be a near-ball, with explicit exponents and constants depending only on n, the interior sphere radius, and the diameter.
  • Any of the boundary conditions in Theorem 1.2—including H_k ≥ 1/R^k or |∇u|^k H_k ≥ 1—characterizes balls, so the higher-order Alexandrov soap-bubble theorem follows as a corollary.
  • The stability results for higher-order mean curvatures hold with weak L1-type deficits, not just uniform ones, and yield both L2 and Hausdorff closeness to a single ball under k-convexity.
  • When regularity constants are allowed to degenerate, the L1-type deviation still forces the domain to be close to a disjoint union of finitely many balls of equal radius, with explicit volume, perimeter, and Hausdorff bounds.
  • The alternative proof of Serrin-type rigidity extends Weinberger's P-function argument from the Laplacian to the full Hessian hierarchy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By analogy with the k=1 case, using L1 or L2 boundary deviations in place of L∞ may improve the stability exponents for k>1; the paper explicitly flags this as future work.
  • The uniform interior sphere radius appears in the constants of Theorem 1.1; if that dependence were removed, Theorem 1.1 would likely upgrade to a statement allowing bubbling, as in Theorem 1.4 for mean curvatures.
  • The equivalence involving |∇u| = ⟨x,ν⟩ suggests a purely geometric overdetermined condition—the boundary gradient magnitude equaling the support function—that could be tested in free-boundary or shape-optimization problems beyond the Hessian setting.
  • The weighted Sobolev–Poincaré inequality proved in the appendix, with explicit constants for John domains, is likely to be reusable in other quantitative symmetry problems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the Magnanini–Poggesi approach for the classical Serrin problem and the soap‐bubble theorem to k‐Hessian operators and higher‐order mean curvatures, for 1≤k≤n. It contains four main groups of results: (i) a maximum principle for the P‐function P=|∇u|^2/2−u associated with the Dirichlet problem S_k(D^2u)=C(n,k), u=0 on ∂Ω, giving a new Weinberger‐type proof of the Serrin rigidity for Hessian operators; (ii) a fundamental integral identity and a quantitative stability estimate (Theorem 1.1) showing that small deviation δ=‖|∇u|−R‖_{L∞(∂Ω)} forces Ω to be quantitatively close to a ball, with exponents depending on the dimension; (iii) new symmetry equivalences (Theorem 1.2) linking the Hessian torsion problem with constant higher‐order mean curvature and other overdetermined conditions, including a new higher‐order soap‐bubble theorem; and (iv) stability results for almost constant k‐mean curvature boundaries, including a bubbling result (Theorem 1.4) obtained by importing the L1‐type analysis of [45]. The appendix provides weighted Sobolev–Poincaré inequalities for solutions of uniformly elliptic equations in divergence form, with explicit constants, which are used in the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper delivers the first unified quantitative stability treatment for overdetermined Hessian problems covering all k, new symmetry statements of soap‐bubble type, and the first quantitative bubbling estimates for higher‐order mean curvatures. The proofs are largely self‐contained and the appendix contains a useful general Sobolev–Poincaré inequality with explicit constants, which is of independent interest. The paper also gives two new proofs of the Brandolini–Nitsch–Salani–Trombetti rigidity theorem. The constant dependence in the main theorems is stated in terms only of n, the interior sphere radius r_i, and the diameter d_Ω, which is a strong feature if justified.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2.1–§3.2.2, Propositions 3.5 and 3.6 and Proof of Theorem 1.1] Propositions 3.5 and 3.6 are stated for 1≤k≤n, but their statements and proofs involve H_{k−2}, which is undefined for k=1. Specifically, (3.23) and (3.28) contain the term H_{k−2}|∇u|^{k−1}, and the proof of Theorem 1.1 in Step 2 invokes these propositions for the full range 1≤k≤n. As written, the proof of Theorem 1.1 does not cover the k=1 case. Since the k=1 case is already established in [36,35,38], the authors should either restrict these propositions to k≥2 and cite the classical result for k=1, or provide the correct k=1 reduction.
  2. [§3.2.2, Proof of Theorem 1.1, Step 2] The transition from the bound (3.28) to the estimate (3.39) absorbs the geometric factor W_k(Ω) into the constant C(n,r_i,d_Ω) without an explicit justification that W_k(Ω) is bounded in terms of n, r_i, and d_Ω. Since one of the claimed strengths of the theorem is exactly this constant dependence, the proof should include a short argument (or a precise reference) showing that W_k and the perimeter are controlled by n, r_i, and d_Ω under the stated regularity and the interior sphere condition.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 4.1] The statement of Theorem 4.1 does not specify the range of k, but the quantity ~D_1 involves S_{k+1}/C(n,k+1), which is undefined for k=n. The theorem should be stated for 1≤k<n (or a separate k=n case should be given), consistent with Corollary 4.2 and Theorem 1.2 where k≤n−1.
  2. [Remark 4.2, inequality (4.6)] Inequality (4.6) is typeset in a way that appears incorrect: it reads H_{k−1}^{k−1/k} ≤ H_{k−1}, but the intended inequality is H_k^{(k−1)/k} ≤ H_{k−1}. Please correct the notation.
  3. [Various] There are several typographical errors: 'Pohožaev identy' in Section 2.3, 'quemassintegral' in Section 2.2, 'furhter results' in reference [28], and 'H^{N−1}' in the statement of Theorem 1.2 should be 'H^{n−1}'.
  4. [Proof of Theorem 3.3] The proof of Theorem 3.3 uses the boundary identity involving H_{k−2}, which is meaningful for k≥2; for k=1 the classical proof is standard but should be cited or treated separately, consistent with the comment on Propositions 3.5 and 3.6.
  5. [Reference [45]] Reference [45] is listed as 'To appear in .' with an empty journal name; the publication venue should be completed before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central stability and symmetry theorems are proved from classical identities and self-contained lemmas; citations to prior work are external reductions, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's core results are derived inside the manuscript rather than assumed. The fundamental identities (3.19)/(3.20) and (4.2) are proved from the equation S_k(D^2u)=binom(n,k), the divergence structure (2.8), the Pohozaev identity (2.12), Minkowski's identity (2.7), Newton's inequalities, and the ellipticity and maximum-principle analysis in Section 3.1; the equality case L[P]=0 is characterized inside Theorem 3.1. In the proof of Theorem 1.1, the deviation δ is an input measured on the boundary, and no parameter is fitted to the target conclusion: the constants depend only on n, r_i, and d_Omega, which enter through the uniform interior sphere condition, the comparison bounds, and the explicitly proved Sobolev-Poincare/interpolation estimates in the appendix. Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 likewise follow from internal identities and classical inequalities. Theorem 1.4 is a reduction to the separately established k=1 bubbling result [45] via the elementary inequality (4.13); this is a citation-supported derivation, not a circular one, since [45] is independent prior work whose assumptions do not include the higher-order conclusion. The paper has minor presentational and scope caveats, such as Propositions 3.5 and 3.6 involving H_{k-2} while being stated for 1≤k≤n, and the implicit strict (k-1)-convexity restriction for k≥2 coming from [13, Theorem 3], but these are correctness or scope issues, not circularity. No self-definitional step, fitted-input-called-prediction step, ansatz-smuggled-via-citation step, or renaming of a known result was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new physical or mathematical entities. It relies on classical tools (Newton inequalities, Pohozaev identity, Minkowski identity, Alexandrov-Fenchel inequalities), on regularity and existence theory for k-Hessian equations, and on auxiliary inequalities proved in the appendix. The main domain assumptions are the existence of a C^2 solution to the k-Hessian Dirichlet problem, the uniform interior sphere condition, and, for the bubbling results, k-convexity.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Newton's inequalities for elementary symmetric functions on the cone Γ_k (Section 2.1, (2.2)).
    Used in Theorem 3.1 to show L[P] >= 0, in Remark 4.1 to show D1 >= 0, and in the proof of Corollary 4.2 and Theorem 1.2. This is a classical algebraic inequality.
  • standard math Pohozaev identity for k-Hessian operators (Proposition 2.1), cited from [9,57].
    Used in Theorem 3.3 and in deriving the fundamental identities (3.19) and (4.2). Assumed as a known integral identity.
  • standard math Minkowski's identity (2.7) and Alexandrov-Fenchel inequalities (2.5) for quermassintegrals.
    Used repeatedly to relate boundary integrals of mean curvatures to quermassintegrals and to compare W_k values.
  • domain assumption Regularity theory for k-Hessian equations, giving C^2 estimates and uniform ellipticity of L (Remark 3.1), based on [17,58,59].
    The ellipticity constants in (3.11)-(3.12) and bounds on D^2u are imported from cited regularity theorems; they require u in Γ_k and domain compatibility.
  • domain assumption Existence of a C^2 solution u to (1.3) on Ω, forcing Ω to be strictly (k-1)-convex and u strictly k-convex by [13, Theorem 3].
    All theorems are conditional on this existence. For k >= 2 this strongly restricts the domain class even though Theorem 1.1's statement says only 'C^2, bounded, connected, open set'.
  • standard math Weighted Sobolev-Poincare inequality for homogeneous uniformly elliptic equations (Theorem A.1), proved in the appendix using Caffarelli's generalized mean value theorem and Hurri-Syrjanen inequalities.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.1 to go from the energy bound (3.39) to the L^r gradient bound (3.43).
  • domain assumption For Theorems 1.3 and 1.4, k-convexity H_k >= 0 on ∂Ω, to use the Newton inequality chain H_k^{1/k} <= H_{k-1}^{1/(k-1)} <= ... <= H (4.12).
    This assumption is explicit in Theorems 1.3 and 1.4; it is needed to reduce the higher-order mean curvature deviation to the classical mean curvature deviation (4.13).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hessian operators, overdetermined problems, and higher order mean curvatures: symmetry and stability results." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/54IOPWLH

@misc{pith2026250523350,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hessian operators, overdetermined problems, and higher order mean curvatures: symmetry and stability results},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/54IOPWLH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23350}
}
abstract

It is well known that there is a deep connection between Serrin's symmetry result -- dealing with overdetermined problems involving the Laplacian -- and the celebrated Alexandrov's Soap Bubble Theorem (SBT) -- stating that, if the mean curvature $H$ of the boundary of a smooth bounded connected open set $\Om$ is constant, then $\Om$ must be a ball. One of the main aims of the paper is to extend the study of such a connection to the broader case of overdetermined problems for Hessian operators and constant higher order mean curvature boundaries. Our analysis will not only provide new proofs of the higher order SBT (originally established by Alexandrov) and of the symmetry for overdetermined Serrin-type problems for Hessian equations (originally established by Brandolini, Nitsch, Salani, and Trombetti), but also bring several benefits, including new interesting symmetry results and quantitative stability estimates. In fact, leveraging the analysis performed in the classical case (i.e., with classical mean curvature and classical Laplacian) by Magnanini and Poggesi in a series of papers, we will extend their approach to the higher order setting (i.e., with $k$-order mean curvature and $k$-Hessian operator, for $k \ge 1$) achieving various quantitative estimates of closeness to the symmetric configuration. Finally, leveraging the quantitative analysis in presence of bubbling phenomena performed in arXiv:2405.06376, we also provide a quantitative stability result of closeness of almost constant $k$-mean curvature boundaries to a set given by the union of a finite number of disjoint balls of equal radii. In passing, we will also provide two alternative proofs of the result established by Brandolini, Nitsch, Salani, and Trombetti, one of which provides the extension to Hessian operators of the approach famously pioneered by Weinberger for the classical Laplacian.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Serrin-type problem in divergence form on Riemannian manifolds

    math.DG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors claim rigidity and geometric inequalities for a Serrin-type problem on nonnegative Ricci curvature manifolds, but the proofs rely on a false comparison of the P-function boundary value.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [10]

    Brandolini, C

    B. Brandolini, C. Nitsch, P. Salani, and C. Trombetti. Stability of radial symmetry for a Monge- Ampère overdetermined problem.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 188(3):445–453, 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [36]

    Magnanini and G

    R. Magnanini and G. Poggesi. Serrin’s problem and Alexandrov’s soap bubble theorem: enhanced stability via integral identities.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 69(4):1181–1205, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [45]

    G. Poggesi. Bubbling and quantitative stability for Alexandrov’s soap bubble theorem withL1- type deviations.To appear in . Preprint (2024) arXiv:2405.06376. Preprint of revised version (2025) arXiv:2405.06376v3

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Aftalion, J

    A. Aftalion, J. Busca, and W. Reichel. Approximate radial symmetry for overdetermined bound- ary value problems.Adv. Differential Equations, 4(6):907–932, 1999

    work page 1999

  5. [2]

    A. D. Aleksandrov. Uniqueness theorems for surfaces in the large. V.Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. (2), 21:412–416, 1962

    work page 1962

  6. [3]

    A. D. Alexandrov. A characteristic property of spheres.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 58:303–315, 1962

    work page 1962

  7. [4]

    Blank and Z

    I. Blank and Z. Hao. The mean value theorem and basic properties of the obstacle problem for divergence form elliptic operators.Comm. Anal. Geom., 23(1):129–158, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [5]

    H. P. Boas and E. J. Straube. Integral inequalities of Hardy and Poincaré type.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 103(1):172–176, 1988

    1988

Show all 61 references
  1. [6]

    Bojarski

    B. Bojarski. Remarks on Sobolev imbedding inequalities. InComplex analysis, Joensuu 1987, volume 1351 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages 52–68. Springer, Berlin, 1988

    1987

  2. [7]

    Brandolini, N

    B. Brandolini, N. Gavitone, C. Nitsch, and C. Trombetti. Characterization of ellipsoids through an overdetermined boundary value problem of Monge-Ampère type.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 101(6):828–841, 2014

    2014

  3. [8]

    Brandolini, C

    B. Brandolini, C. Nitsch, P. Salani, and C. Trombetti. On the stability of the Serrin problem.J. Differential Equations, 245(6):1566–1583, 2008

    2008

  4. [9]

    Brandolini, C

    B. Brandolini, C. Nitsch, P. Salani, and C. Trombetti. Serrin-type overdetermined problems: an alternative proof.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 190(2):267–280, 2008

    2008

  5. [11]

    Brock and A

    F. Brock and A. Henrot. A symmetry result for an overdetermined elliptic problem using con- tinuous rearrangement and domain derivative.Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2), 51(3):375–390, 2002

    2002

  6. [12]

    Buttazzo and B

    G. Buttazzo and B. Kawohl. Overdetermined boundary value problems for the∞-Laplacian.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (2):237–247, 2011

    2011

  7. [13]

    Caffarelli, L

    L. Caffarelli, L. Nirenberg, and J. Spruck. The Dirichlet problem for nonlinear second-order elliptic equations. III. Functions of the eigenvalues of the Hessian.Acta Math., 155(3-4):261–301, 1985

    1985

  8. [14]

    L. A. Caffarelli.The obstacle problem. Lezioni Fermiane. [Fermi Lectures]. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rome; Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1998

    1998

  9. [15]

    Cavallina

    L. Cavallina. Local analysis of a two-phase free boundary problem concerning mean curvature. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 71(4):1411–1435, 2022. REFERENCES 31

    2022

  10. [16]

    Cavallina and G

    L. Cavallina and G. Poggesi. Face 2-phase: how much overdetermination is enough to get symmetry in two-phase problems.To appear in Indiana Univ. Math. J. Preprint (2025) arXiv:2312.11088v2

    2025 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Chou and X.-J

    K.-S. Chou and X.-J. Wang. A variational theory of the Hessian equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 54(9):1029–1064, 2001

    2001

  12. [18]

    Choulli and A

    M. Choulli and A. Henrot. Use of the domain derivative to prove symmetry results in partial differential equations.Math. Nachr., 192:91–103, 1998

    1998

  13. [19]

    Ciraolo and F

    G. Ciraolo and F. Maggi. On the shape of compact hypersurfaces with almost-constant mean curvature.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 70(4):665–716, 2017

    2017

  14. [20]

    Ciraolo, R

    G. Ciraolo, R. Magnanini, and S. Sakaguchi. Symmetry of minimizers with a level surface parallel to the boundary.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 17(11):2789–2804, 2015

    2015

  15. [21]

    Ciraolo and A

    G. Ciraolo and A. Roncoroni. The method of moving planes: a quantitative approach. InBruno Pini Mathematical Analysis Seminar 2018, volume 9 ofBruno Pini Math. Anal. Semin., pages 41–77. Univ. Bologna, Alma Mater Stud., Bologna, 2018

    2018

  16. [22]

    Della Pietra, N

    F. Della Pietra, N. Gavitone, and C. Xia. Symmetrization with respect to mixed volumes.Adv. Math., 388:Paper No. 107887, 31, 2021

    2021

  17. [23]

    Enache and S

    C. Enache and S. Sakaguchi. Some fully nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems with ellip- soidal free boundaries.Math. Nachr., 284(14-15):1872–1879, 2011

    2011

  18. [24]

    Farina and B

    A. Farina and B. Kawohl. Remarks on an overdetermined boundary value problem.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 31(3):351–357, 2008

    2008

  19. [25]

    I. Fragalà. Symmetry results for overdetermined problems on convex domains via Brunn- Minkowski inequalities.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 97(1):55–65, 2012

    2012

  20. [26]

    Fragalà, F

    I. Fragalà, F. Gazzola, and B. Kawohl. Overdetermined problems with possibly degenerate ellipticity, a geometric approach.Math. Z., 254(1):117–132, 2006

    2006

  21. [27]

    Garofalo and J

    N. Garofalo and J. L. Lewis. A symmetry result related to some overdetermined boundary value problems.Amer. J. Math., 111(1):9–33, 1989

    1989

  22. [28]

    Gavitone, A

    N. Gavitone, A. L. Masiello, G. Paoli, and G. Poggesi. Hessian operators, overdetermined prob- lems, and higher order mean curvatures: furhter results.in preparation

  23. [29]

    Henrot and G

    A. Henrot and G. A. Philippin. Some overdetermined boundary value problems with elliptical free boundaries.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 29(2):309–320, 1998

    1998

  24. [30]

    R. Hurri. Poincaré domains inRn.Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math. Dissertationes, (71):42, 1988

    1988

  25. [31]

    Hurri-Syrjänen

    R. Hurri-Syrjänen. An improved Poincaré inequality.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 120(1):213–222, 1994

    1994

  26. [32]

    Ishiwata, R

    M. Ishiwata, R. Magnanini, and H. Wadade. A natural approach to the asymptotic mean value property for thep-Laplacian.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 56(4):Paper No. 97, 22, 2017. REFERENCES 32

    2017

  27. [33]

    Julin and J

    V. Julin and J. Niinikoski. Quantitative Alexandrov theorem and asymptotic behavior of the volume preserving mean curvature flow.Anal. PDE, 16(3):679–710, 2023

    2023

  28. [34]

    Magnanini and G

    R. Magnanini and G. Poggesi. On the stability for Alexandrov’s soap bubble theorem.J. Anal. Math., 139(1):179–205, 2019

    2019

  29. [35]

    Magnanini and G

    R. Magnanini and G. Poggesi. Nearly optimal stability for Serrin’s problem and the soap bubble theorem.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 59(1):Paper No. 35, 23, 2020

    2020

  30. [37]

    Magnanini and G

    R. Magnanini and G. Poggesi. The location of hot spots and other extremal points.Math. Ann., 384(1-2):511–549, 2022

    2022

  31. [38]

    Magnanini and G

    R. Magnanini and G. Poggesi. Interpolating estimates with applications to some quantitative symmetry results.Math. Eng., 5(1):Paper No. 002, 21, 2023

    2023

  32. [39]

    Magnanini and G

    R. Magnanini and G. Poggesi. Quantitative symmetry in a mixed Serrin-type problem for a constrained torsional rigidity.Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 63(1):Paper No. 23, 26, 2024

    2024

  33. [40]

    Montiel and A

    S. Montiel and A. Ros. Compact hypersurfaces: the Alexandrov theorem for higher order mean curvatures. InDifferential geometry, volume 52 ofPitman Monogr. Surveys Pure Appl. Math., pages 279–296. Longman Sci. Tech., Harlow, 1991

    1991

  34. [41]

    C. B. Morrey, Jr.Multiple integrals in the calculus of variations, volume Band 130 ofDie Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, 1966

    1966

  35. [42]

    Nitsch and C

    C. Nitsch and C. Trombetti. The classical overdetermined Serrin problem.Complex Var. Elliptic Equ., 63(7-8):1107–1122, 2018

    2018

  36. [43]

    OptimalquantitativestabilityforaSerrin-typeproblem in convex cones.Math

    F.Pacella, G.Poggesi, andA.Roncoroni. OptimalquantitativestabilityforaSerrin-typeproblem in convex cones.Math. Z., 307(4):Paper No. 79, 19, 2024

    2024

  37. [44]

    L. E. Payne and Philip W. Schaefer. Duality theorems in some overdetermined boundary value problems.Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 11(6):805–819, 1989

    1989

  38. [46]

    G. Poggesi. Remarks about the mean value property and some weighted Poincaré-type inequal- ities.Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4), 203(3):1443–1461, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    G. Poggesi. Soap bubbles and convex cones: optimal quantitative rigidity.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 377(9):6619–6668, 2024

    2024

  40. [48]

    R. C. Reilly. On the Hessian of a function and the curvatures of its graph.Michigan Math. J., 20:373–383, 1973. REFERENCES 33

    1973

  41. [49]

    R. C. Reilly. Applications of the Hessian operator in a Riemannian manifold.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 26(3):459–472, 1977

    1977

  42. [50]

    R. C. Reilly. Mean curvature, the Laplacian, and soap bubbles.Amer. Math. Monthly, 89(3):180– 188, 197–198, 1982

    1982

  43. [51]

    A. Ros. Compact hypersurfaces with constant higher order mean curvatures.Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 3(3-4):447–453, 1987

    1987

  44. [52]

    Finite total curvature and soap bubbles with almost constant higher-order mean curvature.Int

    Mario Santilli. Finite total curvature and soap bubbles with almost constant higher-order mean curvature.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (17):12111–12135, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Stability from rigidity via umbilicity.Adv

    Julian Scheuer. Stability from rigidity via umbilicity.Adv. Calc. Var., 18(2):381–405, 2025

    2025

  46. [54]

    J. Serrin. A symmetry problem in potential theory.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 43:304–318, 1971

    1971

  47. [55]

    N. S. Trudinger. On new isoperimetric inequalities and symmetrization.J. Reine Angew. Math., 488:203–220, 1997

    1997

  48. [56]

    K. Tso. On symmetrization and Hessian equations.J. Analyse Math., 52:94–106, 1989

    1989

  49. [57]

    K. Tso. Remarks on critical exponents for Hessian operators.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire, 7(2):113–122, 1990

    1990

  50. [58]

    X. J. Wang. A class of fully nonlinear elliptic equations and related functionals.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 43(1):25–54, 1994

    1994

  51. [59]

    Wang.The k-Hessian Equation, pages 177–252

    X.-J. Wang.The k-Hessian Equation, pages 177–252. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 2009

    2009

  52. [60]

    H. F. Weinberger. Remark on the preceding paper of Serrin.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 43:319– 320, 1971

    1971

  53. [61]

    W. P. Ziemer. A Poincaré-type inequality for solutions of elliptic differential equations.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 97(2):286–290, 1986

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.