REVIEW 1 cited by
Reynolds number scaling and inner-outer overlap of stream-wise Reynolds stress in wall turbulence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The scaling of Reynolds stresses in turbulent wall-bounded flows is the subject of a long running debate. In the near-wall ``inner'' region, a sizeable group, inspired by the ``attached eddy model'', has advocated the unlimited growth of $\langle uu\rangle^+$ and in particular of its inner peak at $y^+\approxeq 15$, with $\ln\Reytau$ \citep[see e.g.][and references therein]{smitsetal2021}. Only recently, \citet{chen_sreeni2021,chen_sreeni2022} have argued on the basis of bounded dissipation, that $\langle uu\rangle^+$ remains finite in the inner near-wall region for $\Reytau\rightarrow\infty$, with finite Reynolds number corrections of order $\Reytau^{-1/4}$. In this paper, the overlap between the two-term inner expansion $f_0(y^+) + f_1(y^+)/\Reytau^{1/4}$ of \citet{monkewitz22} and the leading order outer expansion for $\langle uu\rangle^+$ is shown to be of the form $C_0 + C_1\,(y^+/\Reytau)^{1/4}$. With a new indicator function, overlaps of this form are reliably identified in $\langle uu\rangle^+$ profiles for channels and pipes, while the situation in boundary layers requires further clarification. On the other hand, the standard logarithmic indicator function, evaluated for the same data, shows no sign of a logarithmic law to connect an inner expansion of $\langle uu\rangle^+$ growing as $\ln{\Reytau}$ to an outer expansion of order unity.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Reconsiderations about inner layer of wall-bounded flows
The paper proposes a revised log-plus-linear overlap model with a universal inner log constant κ_in ≈ 1/2.6 and finds two normal-stress models fit equally well closer to the wall.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.