pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16049 · v1 · pith:564AX5AYnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🧮 math.DS · math.AP· q-bio.MN

Conditions for spatial instabilities and pattern formation from monomial steady state parameterizations

Carsten Conradi , Maya Mincheva , Hannes Uecker This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 18:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS math.APq-bio.MN
keywords reaction networksTuring instabilitymonomial parameterizationspatial patternsreaction-diffusion systemsphosphorylationdiffusion-driven instabilitycharacteristic polynomial
0
0 comments X

The pith

For reaction networks admitting a monomial steady-state parameterization, the signs of the constant and leading coefficients in the diffusion-scaled characteristic polynomial supply a sufficient condition for Turing-like spatial instability

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops conditions for the onset of spatial instabilities in reaction-diffusion systems whose homogeneous reaction network possesses a monomial parameterization of its steady states. A sufficient criterion is obtained by inspecting the signs of the constant term and the highest-degree coefficient of the characteristic polynomial of the Jacobian after it has been scaled by the diffusion coefficients; when these signs are appropriate, instability to spatially inhomogeneous solutions occurs on domains of sufficient size. Because the parameterization is monomial, the criterion reduces directly to polynomial inequalities involving only the rate constants and diffusion coefficients. The method is demonstrated on a model of sequential distributive (de)phosphorylation at two sites, producing an explicit instability condition that depends solely on the four catalytic constants and the diffusion coefficients of the four enzyme-substrate complexes.

Core claim

A monomial steady-state parameterization of the reaction network converts the question of diffusion-driven instability into the requirement that the constant term and leading coefficient of the characteristic polynomial of the diffusion-scaled Jacobian possess opposite signs; this sign condition is sufficient to guarantee a Turing-like instability to spatially inhomogeneous steady states once the domain is large enough.

What carries the argument

Monomial steady-state parameterization of the homogeneous reaction network, which reduces the linear stability criteria to polynomial inequalities in the kinetic and diffusion parameters.

If this is right

  • The sign condition applies to any reaction network that possesses a monomial steady-state parameterization.
  • Once the sign condition holds, a concrete lower bound on the measure of the domain |Ω| is required to realize the instability.
  • For the two-site phosphorylation network the instability condition involves only the four catalytic rate constants and the four diffusion coefficients of the enzyme-substrate complexes.
  • The resulting inequalities are algebraic and can be checked without solving the steady-state equations numerically.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same algebraic approach could be applied to other biological networks that admit monomial parameterizations, such as certain gene-regulatory or metabolic systems.
  • The method supplies a practical design tool for constructing synthetic reaction networks that are guaranteed to produce spatial patterns under diffusion.
  • Extensions to different boundary conditions or to networks whose parameterizations are rational rather than strictly monomial would enlarge the class of systems that can be treated.

Load-bearing premise

The spatially homogeneous reaction network must admit an explicit monomial parameterization of its steady states.

What would settle it

A direct numerical integration of the reaction-diffusion system on a domain satisfying the derived size condition, using parameter values that obey the sign inequalities, yet showing only the homogeneous steady state remains stable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16049 by Carsten Conradi, Hannes Uecker, Maya Mincheva.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Examples of polynomials with constant and leading coefficient of different sign that satisfy conditions (3.5a) & (3.5b) for n is odd (n even, corresponds to the negative of the depicted curves). d = 2 (Ω ⊂ IR2 ): |Ω| > p2 1,1 π µ¯ , (3.7) where p1,1 ≈ 1.8412 is first positive zero of the first derivative of the first Bessel function J1; d = 3 (Ω ⊂ IR3 ): |Ω| > 4 3 p 3 3 2 ,1 π (¯µ) 3 2 , (3.8) where p 3 2 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Shaded region: values of k3 and µ with det(A(µ)) > 0. a6, namely det(A)(µ) = Cµ3 (a0µ 6 + . . . + a5µ + a6) = µ 3 (k3 + 0.3)2  − [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Parameters (4.2), constraints m = m(k3) based on (2.9b) (MP setting), con￾tinuation in k3. (a,b) Dispersion relations before and after spatial instability of c(k3). (c,d) Basic bifurcation diagram, and sample solutions. Fig.3(c) shows a basic BD for (4.1), (4.5) on Ω = (−20, 20) with Neumann BCs3 , where kc1k2 :=  1 |Ω| Z Ω c 2 1 (x) dx 1/2 . (4.12) 3we refer to Remark 4.3 and [3] for details on the spat… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Like Fig.3 but with k9 = 1. Loss of stability of c(k3) now via Hopf bifurcations,  symbols. (a) DRs after first two Hopf bifurcations; (b) after first steady bifurcation. (c) BD; the zoom inset also shows the first SW branch (orange), and a breather branch (green). (d) space–time plots (top) of c1 for the three SWs marked in (c), and behavior of c1(t) at the left boundary. (e) behavior of period T along B… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: DNS for perturbations of SW2 (a–c) and SW3 (d–e). can be seen in the oscillatory behavior of kG(t)k∞ in (e)), yielding instability of SW3. Additionally we remark that also SW1 is unstable, as expected from the subcritical bifurcation of the SW branch, as small perturbations yield convergence to c here (not shown). Thus, in summary we find that we have a rather small range k3 ∈ (k3a, k3b) where the SWs are … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The NP setting, ξ = (2, 1, 1) fixed, k9 = 0.5, continuation in k3, constraints (4.6) with m initialized at k3 = 5.5. Breakup of the c — ec bifurcation from Fig.3 to an imperfect bifurcation. 4.4. 2D. Fig.7 shows a basic BD for (4.1) on DR=disk of radius R, here R = 10, in the NP setting, using again (4.2) but with (4.3), i.e., k9 = 1, to also discuss Hopf bifurcations again and in particular to compute RWs… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (4.1),(4.6) over D10, base parameters (4.2) with k9 = 1. (a) BD of basic steady states (A, dark blue; B, light blue; and C,D, orange), and one RW branch (violet); kc1k2 over k3 in (a1) and behavior of speed s along RW branch in (a2), showing a drift bifurcation of RW from A at k3 ≈ 1.4. Samples in (b). Like in Fig.4, the loss of stability of c is due to a Hopf bifurcation with a pair of complex conjugate e… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: DNS for (4.1) over D10 with ICs as perturbations of c at given k3. (a) k ≈ 1.1922; initial approach to A solution, then convergence to RW. (b) k ≈ 1.17; convergence to A. Importantly, the RWs are linearly (i.e., spectrally) stable between the right and left fold of the RW branch, while the A branch only gains stability at the drift bifurcation of the RWs. This is confirmed by DNS in Fig.8, also illustratin… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the onset of spatial instabilities in reaction networks where the spatially homogeneous system admits a steady state parameterization. We formulate a sufficient condition -- based on the signs of the constant and leading coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of the linearized Jacobian scaled by the diffusion coefficients -- that guarantees a Turing-like instability to spatially inhomogeneous solutions on appropriately chosen domains $\Omega$. We also present a specific condition on the domain size $|\Omega|$ required to trigger this instability. As a consequence of employing a monomial parameterization, these conditions take the form of algebraic polynomial inequalities involving only rate constants and diffusion coefficients. We apply these ideas to a network describing the sequential and distributive (de-)phosphorylation of a protein at two binding sites, ultimately deriving a condition involving only the four catalytic constants of the enzymes and the diffusion coefficients of the four enzyme-substrate complexes that guarantees a Turing-like instability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a sufficient condition for Turing-like spatial instabilities in reaction-diffusion systems whose homogeneous steady states admit a monomial parameterization. The condition is expressed via the signs of the constant and leading coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of the diffusion-scaled Jacobian; when these signs are opposite, a positive real eigenvalue crossing is claimed to occur for sufficiently large domains Ω. The resulting algebraic inequalities involve only rate constants and diffusion coefficients. The approach is illustrated on a two-site sequential distributive phosphorylation network, producing an explicit condition on the four catalytic constants and the diffusion coefficients of the enzyme-substrate complexes.

Significance. If the central derivation is completed and the eigenvalue-crossing step is verified, the work supplies an algebraic route to pattern-formation criteria that bypasses numerical linearization for the restricted but common class of monomial steady-state parameterizations. This could be useful in systems biology for rapid screening of parameter regimes without simulation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (derivation of the sufficient condition): the claim that opposite signs of the constant and leading coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of the diffusion-scaled Jacobian guarantee a positive real-part eigenvalue crossing is asserted but not demonstrated. No explicit argument (e.g., via Descartes’ rule, Routh-Hurwitz violation, or continuity of roots) is supplied showing that the sign pattern forces a root with Re(λ) > 0; this step is load-bearing for the Turing instability conclusion.
  2. [§4.1–4.2] §4.1–4.2 (domain-size condition): the requirement on |Ω| is introduced after the sign condition has been obtained and appears to be selected post-hoc to place a discrete wave number inside the unstable band. The manuscript does not quantify how sensitive the instability is to modest changes in |Ω| or whether the condition remains sufficient when |Ω| is fixed a priori by the experimental geometry.
  3. [Application section] Application section (phosphorylation network): the reduction to a polynomial inequality in the four catalytic constants and four diffusion coefficients relies on substituting the monomial steady-state expressions into every Jacobian entry. The manuscript does not verify that the resulting characteristic polynomial indeed changes sign under the stated coefficient conditions for the specific 8-dimensional system; an explicit low-dimensional example or symbolic check would strengthen the claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2] The definition of the monomial parameterization (early in §2) should be accompanied by a short concrete example showing how the steady-state concentrations are written as monomials in the rate constants.
  2. Notation for the diffusion-scaled Jacobian is introduced without a displayed equation; adding an explicit formula (e.g., D^{-1}J or equivalent) would improve readability.
  3. The abstract states that the conditions are 'algebraic polynomial inequalities'; the manuscript should confirm that all intermediate expressions remain polynomials after substitution and that no denominators are introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive suggestions, which have helped clarify several aspects of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (derivation of the sufficient condition): the claim that opposite signs of the constant and leading coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of the diffusion-scaled Jacobian guarantee a positive real-part eigenvalue crossing is asserted but not demonstrated. No explicit argument (e.g., via Descartes’ rule, Routh-Hurwitz violation, or continuity of roots) is supplied showing that the sign pattern forces a root with Re(λ) > 0; this step is load-bearing for the Turing instability conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification is needed. The characteristic polynomial of the diffusion-scaled Jacobian is monic, so its leading coefficient is positive. When the constant term has the opposite sign, the coefficient sequence necessarily exhibits at least one sign change. By Descartes’ rule of signs, this guarantees at least one positive real root and hence an eigenvalue with positive real part. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a dedicated paragraph in §3 that states this argument explicitly, including a short remark on its applicability to the diffusion-scaled matrix. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1–4.2] §4.1–4.2 (domain-size condition): the requirement on |Ω| is introduced after the sign condition has been obtained and appears to be selected post-hoc to place a discrete wave number inside the unstable band. The manuscript does not quantify how sensitive the instability is to modest changes in |Ω| or whether the condition remains sufficient when |Ω| is fixed a priori by the experimental geometry.

    Authors: The domain-size condition ensures that at least one eigenvalue of the Laplacian on Ω lies inside the interval of wave numbers for which the sign condition already guarantees a positive real eigenvalue. This yields a sufficient criterion for sufficiently large domains. We have revised §4 to clarify that the algebraic sign condition is independent of geometry and can be checked for any fixed |Ω| by evaluating the characteristic polynomial at the concrete Laplacian eigenvalues; the large-domain statement is simply the easiest sufficient case. A quantitative sensitivity analysis with respect to small perturbations of |Ω| lies outside the algebraic scope of the paper and would require numerical continuation, which we have noted as a possible direction for future work. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Application section] Application section (phosphorylation network): the reduction to a polynomial inequality in the four catalytic constants and four diffusion coefficients relies on substituting the monomial steady-state expressions into every Jacobian entry. The manuscript does not verify that the resulting characteristic polynomial indeed changes sign under the stated coefficient conditions for the specific 8-dimensional system; an explicit low-dimensional example or symbolic check would strengthen the claim.

    Authors: Because the general sufficient condition of §3 applies once the signs of the constant and leading coefficients are known, the instability for the phosphorylation network follows directly from the symbolic expressions we already compute. To make this verification more transparent, we have added a short, fully worked 2-species example in the revised manuscript that explicitly expands the characteristic polynomial and confirms the sign change produces a positive root. For the 8-dimensional case we now display the explicit (though lengthy) expressions for the constant and leading coefficients so that readers can verify the sign conditions without expanding the full determinant. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation is self-contained under explicit monomial parameterization assumption

full rationale

The paper states upfront that it studies networks admitting a steady-state parameterization and then employs the monomial form to obtain algebraic polynomial inequalities on rate constants and diffusion coefficients. The sufficient condition for Turing-like instability is derived directly from the signs of the constant and leading coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of the diffusion-scaled Jacobian, together with a domain-size condition. No parameters are fitted to data, no predictions are made that reduce to the inputs by construction, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems from prior author work are invoked in the provided abstract or description. The derivation chain is therefore a standard mathematical reduction under a clearly stated hypothesis; the fact that the reduction fails without the monomial assumption is simply the scope of the result, not circularity. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks as a first-principles analysis in dynamical systems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a monomial steady-state parameterization for the homogeneous system and on standard facts from linear stability analysis of reaction-diffusion PDEs. No free parameters are introduced in the abstract; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The reaction network admits a monomial steady-state parameterization
    Explicitly used to convert the instability condition into polynomial inequalities in rate constants and diffusion coefficients.
  • standard math Linearization around the homogeneous steady state yields a characteristic polynomial whose roots govern spatial stability
    Standard step in Turing analysis; invoked when the sign condition on constant and leading coefficients is stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5684 in / 1468 out tokens · 43691 ms · 2026-05-19T18:45:43.187729+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We formulate a sufficient condition – based on the signs of the constant and leading coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of the linearized Jacobian scaled by the diffusion coefficients – that guarantees a Turing-like instability... As a consequence of employing a monomial parameterization, these conditions take the form of algebraic polynomial inequalities involving only rate constants and diffusion coefficients.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    8, 463–464

    Turing patterns, 70 years later , Nature Computational Science 2 (2022), no. 8, 463–464

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Ashbaugh and Rafael D

    Mark S. Ashbaugh and Rafael D. Benguria, Universal Bounds for the Low Eigenvalues of Neumann Laplacians in N Dimensions , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 24 (1993), no. 3, 557–570

    work page 1993

  3. [3]

    Conradi, M

    C. Conradi, M. Mincheva, and H. Uecker, Supplementary information; Matlab sources and documentation , 2026, A vailable at [27], tab Applications

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    1, 494–513

    Carsten Conradi, Elisenda Feliu, and Maya Mincheva, On the existence of Hopf bifurcations in the sequential and distributive double phosphorylation cycle , Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 17 (2020), no. 1, 494–513

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    1, 105–131

    Carsten Conradi, Dietrich Flockerzi, and Jörg Raisch, Multistationarity in the activation of an MAPK: parametriz- ing the relevant region in parameter space , Mathematical Biosciences 211 (2008), no. 1, 105–131

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    10, 4174–4209

    Carsten Conradi, Alexandru Iosif, and Thomas Kahle, Multistationarity in the Space of Total Concentrations for Systems that Admit a Monomial Parametrization , Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 81 (2019), no. 10, 4174–4209

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Carsten Conradi and Maya Mincheva, Catalytic constants enable the emergence of bistability in dual phosphory- lation, Journal of The Royal Society Interface 11 (2014), no. 95

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    6, 1829–1852

    Carsten Conradi, Maya Mincheva, and Anne Shiu, Emergence of oscillations in a mixed-mechanism phosphoryla- tion system , Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 81 (2019), no. 6, 1829–1852

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    1, 126–155 (English)

    Carsten Conradi and Anne Shiu, A Global Convergence Result for Processive Multisite Phosphorylation Systems , Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 77 (2015), no. 1, 126–155 (English)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Martin Feinberg, Foundations of chemical reaction network theory , Springer

    work page

  11. [11]

    Elisenda Feliu and Nidhi Kaihnsa, Network reduction and absence of Hopf Bifurcations in dual phosphorylation networks with three Intermediates , arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16179 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Golubitsky and D

    M. Golubitsky and D. G. Schaeffer, Singularities and groups in bifurcation theory. Vol. I , Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 51, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985. 22 CARSTEN CONRADI, MAYA MINCHEV A, AND HANNES UECKER

    work page 1985

  13. [13]

    Golubitsky and I

    M. Golubitsky and I. Stewart, The symmetry perspective , Birkhäuser, Basel, 2002

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    Halatek and E

    J. Halatek and E. Frey, Rethinking pattern formation in reaction–diffusion systems , Nature Physics 14 (2018), 507–514

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    11, 2028–2058

    Katharina Holstein, Dietrich Flockerzi, and Carsten Conradi, Multistationarity in sequential distributed multisite phosphorylation networks , Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 75 (2013), no. 11, 2028–2058

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Hoyle, Pattern formation , Cambridge University Press., 2006

    R.B. Hoyle, Pattern formation , Cambridge University Press., 2006

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    Jürgen Jost, Partial differential equations, volume 214 of , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    , Mathematical Methods in Biology and Neurobiology , Springer, 2014

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    2213, 20200280

    Krause, Andrew L and Gaffney, Eamonn A and Maini, Philip K and Klika, Václav , Introduction to ’Recent progress and open frontiers in Turing’s theory of morphogenesis’ , Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 379 (2021), no. 2213, 20200280

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    J. Krishnan, Lingjun Lu, and Aiman Alam Nazki, The interplay of spatial organization and biochemistry in building blocks of cellular signalling pathways , Journal of The Royal Society Interface 17 (2020), no. 166, 20200251

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Maini and Thomas E

    Philip K. Maini and Thomas E. Woolley, The Turing model for biological pattern formation , The Dynamics of Biological Systems, Springer, 2019, pp. 189–204

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    P. C. Matthews and S. M. Cox, Pattern formation with a conservation law , Nonlinearity 13 (2000), no. 4, 1293– 1320

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    Meiners and H

    A. Meiners and H. Uecker, Helfrich cylinders – instabilities, bifurcation analysis and amplitude equations , SIADS (2026)

    work page 2026

  24. [24]

    Krishnan, Spatial localisation meets biomolecular networks , Nature Communications 12 (2021), no

    Govind Menon and J. Krishnan, Spatial localisation meets biomolecular networks , Nature Communications 12 (2021), no. 1, 5357

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Mercedes Pérez Millán and Adrián G Turjanski, MAPK’s networks and their capacity for multistationarity due to toric steady states , Mathematical Biosciences 262 (2015), 125–137

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Murray, Mathematical biology II: spatial models and biomedical applications , vol

    James D. Murray, Mathematical biology II: spatial models and biomedical applications , vol. 3, Springer-Verlag, 2001

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    pde2path, https://pde2path.uol.de/, 2026

    work page 2026

  28. [28]

    Pérez Millán and A

    M. Pérez Millán and A. Dickenstein, The Structure of MESSI Biological Systems , SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 17 (2018), no. 2, 1650–1682

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Mercedes Pérez-Millán, Alicia Dickenstein, Anne Shiu, and Carsten Conradi, Chemical reaction systems with toric steady states , Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 74 (2012), 1027–1065 (English)

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Rademacher and H

    J.D.M. Rademacher and H. Uecker, Symmetries and freezing of 1D problems in pde2path – a tutorial via some Ginzburg-Landau and FHN models , 2017, A vailable at [ 27]

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Satnoianu, M

    R. Satnoianu, M. Menzinger, and Ph. Maini, Turing instabilities in general systems , J. Math. Biol. 41 (2000), no. 6, 493–512

    work page 2000

  32. [32]

    Satnoianu and P

    R.A. Satnoianu and P. van den Driessche, Some remarks on matrix stability with application to Turing instability , Linear Algebra and its Applications 398 (2005), 69–74, Special Issue on Matrices and Mathematical Biology

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    Satnoianu, Michael Menzinger, and Philip K

    Razvan A. Satnoianu, Michael Menzinger, and Philip K. Maini, Turing instabilities in general systems , Journal of Mathematical Biology 41 (2000), no. 6, 493–512

    work page 2000

  34. [34]

    Series B, Biological Sciences 237 (1952), no

    Turing, Alan Mathison, The chemical basis of morphogenesis , Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 237 (1952), no. 641, 37–72

    work page 1952

  35. [35]

    Uecker, Numerical continuation and bifurcation in Nonlinear PDEs , SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2021

    H. Uecker, Numerical continuation and bifurcation in Nonlinear PDEs , SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2021

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Villar-Sepulveda and A

    E. Villar-Sepulveda and A. Champneys, General conditions for Turing and wave instabilities in RD systems , Journal of Mathematical Biology 86 (2023), no. 39

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Champneys, and Andrew L

    Edgardo Villar-Sepúlveda, Alan R. Champneys, and Andrew L. Krause, Designing reaction-cross-diffusion systems with Turing and wave instabilities , Journal of Mathematical Biology 91 (2025), no. 4, 37

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Yochelis, S

    A. Yochelis, S. Flemming, and C. Beta, Versatile patterns in the actin cortex of motile cells: Self-organized pulses can coexist with macropinocytic ring-shaped waves , PRL 129 (2022), 088101. Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft, Berlin, Germany Email address : carsten.conradi@htw-berlin.de Department of Mathematical Sciences, Northern Illinois Universi...

    work page 2022