Modulational spectrum of infinite-depth hydroelastic Stokes waves

Chengbin Zhu; Ting-Yang Hsiao; Ye Zhang; Zirui Li

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Modulational spectrum of infinite-depth hydroelastic Stokes waves

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper determines the complete local Bloch spectrum of small-amplitude hydroelastic Stokes waves in infinite depth, splitting the four bifurcating eigenvalues into a Benjamin–Feir pair and a long-wave pair, and derives an exact…

desk verdict First full Euler-level Benjamin-Feir spectrum for infinite-depth hydroelastic Stokes waves; the result is credible and well checked against limits, but the central coefficients rest on hand algebra that deserves independent symbolic verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04938 v1 pith:56VURL3N submitted 2026-08-05 math.AP

Ting-Yang Hsiao , Zirui Li , Ye Zhang , Chengbin Zhu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 76B1535B3535Q3547A55

keywords Benjamin–FeirinstabilityhydroelasticwavesStokesBlochspectrummodulationalstabilityinfinitedepthKatoperturbationtheoryflexural-gravity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to determine all four eigenvalues that bifurcate from zero when a small-amplitude periodic Stokes wave on an infinitely deep fluid is modulated, with the surface carrying both surface tension and elastic bending. Away from Wilton-type resonances, the four eigenvalues split into a Benjamin–Feir pair and a long-wave pair, and a single explicit discriminant decides whether the Benjamin–Feir pair leaves the imaginary axis. If the paper is right, the exact non-resonant phase diagram in the surface-tension-bending plane is now known at the Euler level, including a bounded island of stability caused by bending that has no counterpart in the pure gravity or gravity-capillary problem. The infinite-depth problem is singular: the long-wave eigenvalues move at order $O(\sqrt{|\mu|})$ instead of the finite-depth order $O(|\mu|)$, so the result is not a limit of the finite-depth theory.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a finite-dimensional spectral reduction built on Kato's similarity transformation theory, applied after a good-unknown change of variables and an infinite-depth conformal flattening of the free surface. On the resulting four-dimensional spectral subspace the paper constructs a symplectic and reversible basis, computes the Hamiltonian-reversible $4\times4$ matrix explicitly to second order in $\epsilon$ and $\mu$, and then block-diagonalizes it in two steps: first removing a coupling term that carries no factor $\mu$, then solving a Sylvester-type homological equation whose solvability rests on the exact structure of the diagonal blocks. The three coefficients $e_{11},e_{12},e_{22}$, the drift coefficient $\breve{c}_{\kappa,b}$, and the long computation of the second-order Stokes expansion, the flattening maps, and the Kato basis are what convert the abstract perturbation scheme into the explicit discriminant and the phase diagram.

What would settle it

Run an independent high-order symbolic expansion of the Stokes branch and of the Bloch operator to verify the coefficient identities for $e_{11},e_{22}$ and the discriminant $\Delta_{\rm BF}=8e_{22}e_{11}\epsilon^2-e_{22}^2\mu^2+O(\epsilon^3,\mu\epsilon^2,\mu^2\epsilon,\mu^3)$; equivalently, numerically Floquet-solve the linearized hydroelastic system at $\kappa=0$, $b=0.3$ with small $\epsilon$ and check that all four small eigenvalues are purely imaginary, while at $b=0.2$ a pair acquires nonzero real part, since a single mismatch in the sign of ${\rm Ind}_\infty$ in the claimed island would settle the central claim against.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that for every non-resonant parameter pair $\kappa\ge 0$, $b>0$, and for sufficiently small amplitude $\epsilon$ and Floquet exponent $\mu>0$, the linearized hydroelastic Bloch operator has exactly four small eigenvalues. They split into a Benjamin–Feir pair $\lambda^{\pm}_1$ and a long-wave pair $\lambda^{\pm}_0$; the Benjamin–Feir pair is governed by an explicit discriminant $\Delta_{\rm BF}(\kappa,b;\mu,\epsilon)=8e_{22}e_{11}\epsilon^2-e_{22}^2\mu^2+O(\epsilon^3,\mu\epsilon^2,\mu^2\epsilon,\mu^3)$, where $e_{11},e_{22}$ are explicit rational functions of $\kappa,b$. In the sideband scaling $\mu=\epsilon\nu$, instability is decided by the index ${\rm Ind}_\infty=8e_{11}e_{22}$: a positive index gives a nonempty unstable interval $0<|\nu|<\nu_*$, while a negative index keeps all four small eigenvalues purely imaginary. Proposition 2.8 converts this sign into an exact non-resonant phase diagram in the $(\kappa,b)$ plane, with two stable components: a low-bending strip adjacent to the second-harmonic resonance and a bounded stability island generated by elastic bending. Outside this stable set, and away from a drift degeneracy, the unstable Benjamin–Feir branches form a local figure-eight curve; in the zero-bending limit the reduced coefficients recover the known deep-water gravity and gravity-capillary results.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the four eigenvalues are faithfully captured by the finite-dimensional Kato reduction and by the long chain of second-order expansions of the Stokes branch, the flattening maps, and the Kato basis; if one of those coefficient lists contains an algebraic error, the sign of the discriminant and hence the stability island could shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For parameters with ${\rm Ind}_\infty>0$, small-amplitude hydroelastic wavetrains are modulationally unstable to sidebands with $0<|\nu|<\nu_*$, and the unstable spectral branches form a local figure-eight curve away from the drift degeneracy.
For parameters with ${\rm Ind}_\infty<0$, all four small Bloch eigenvalues remain purely imaginary, giving an exact leading-order stability diagram whose stable regions are the low-bending strip and the bounded stability island.
In the zero-bending limit $b\to 0$, the reduced coefficients recover the known deep-water gravity and gravity-capillary thresholds, including the gravity-capillary boundary at $\kappa=2\sqrt3-1$ and $\kappa=1/2$.
Because the long-wave pair scales as $O(\sqrt{|\mu|})$ in infinite depth rather than $O(|\mu|)$ in finite depth, the infinite-depth problem is a singular limit of the finite-depth hydroelastic result; the limits $h\to\infty$ and $\mu\to 0$ do not commute.
On the transition set ${\rm Ind}_\infty=0$ the leading criterion degenerates, so higher-order terms in the discriminant are required to decide stability there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

An immediate extension is the degenerate set ${\rm Ind}_\infty=0$: the paper states that higher-order terms decide the stability there, so computing the next-order discriminant would complete the phase diagram on the transition curves.
The bending-induced island gives a concrete prediction for wave-ice settings: at zero surface tension, intermediate bending rigidities roughly $1/4<b<4/11$ should suppress sideband growth, while slightly smaller rigidities should allow it; this is a testable numerical prediction.
Because the long-wave scale is $O(\sqrt{|\mu|})$ rather than $O(|\mu|)$, formal NLS-type modulation theories for deep hydroelastic waves may need a different scaling from the finite-depth case; the present Euler-level spectrum provides a benchmark against which such envelope equations should be checked.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is the first complete Euler-level description of the four small Bloch eigenvalues for infinite-depth hydroelastic Stokes waves, and the result is worth taking seriously. The paper does real work: it sets up the hydroelastic Euler system with gravity, surface tension and bending, builds a real-analytic Stokes branch, uses Kato perturbation theory with a careful one-sided analytic continuation in the Floquet exponent, and reduces the spectral problem to a 4x4 Hamiltonian-reversible matrix. The explicit coefficients e11, e12, e22 and the resulting discriminant produce a concrete stability diagram, including a bounded bending-induced stability island. That is a genuine advance: previous hydroelastic work was either numerical, NLS-based, or finite depth.

What I like most: the sanity checks are not decorative. The zero-bending limit recovers known deep-water gravity and gravity-capillary coefficients, and the pure-gravity point recovers the deep-water Benjamin-Feir expansion and threshold from Berti-Maspero-Ventura. The singular change of the long-wave scale from O(mu) to O(sqrt(mu)) is explained through the zero-mode Dirichlet-Neumann symbol. The appendices are detailed, and the block-decoupling argument is carefully organized so that the singular Sylvester equation does not produce negative powers of mu.

Soft spots, in proportion. The main risk is purely algebraic: the entries e11, e12, e22 in Proposition 4.7 are assembled from long coefficient lists in Appendices B and D, and a sign or factor slip in, say, a2[2] or the cancellation chi(epsilon) = 1 + O(epsilon^3) would shift the discriminant, the transition curves, and the stability island. I did not find a concrete error, though the consistency checks cover only the boundary of the parameter plane, not its interior. That makes an independent symbolic re-computation the natural first request for a referee. Also, Lemma 3.1 (existence and analyticity of the spectral projectors) is cited rather than proved; it is standard, so this is minor. The assumption avoiding Wilton-type resonances is explicit and honest.

Bottom line: the central theorem is credible, the argument is coherent, and the price of admission is checking long algebra. This deserves a serious referee and likely publication after the algebra is independently verified. For a water-waves spectral analyst, this is the paper to cite for the hydroelastic infinite-depth case.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies small-amplitude 2π-periodic hydroelastic Stokes waves in infinite depth under gravity, surface tension, and elastic bending. Away from the Wilton-type resonance set, the authors construct a real-analytic Stokes branch and analyze, by Kato spectral perturbation theory combined with Hamiltonian and reversible reductions, the four eigenvalues of the Bloch operator that bifurcate from the defective zero eigenvalue of the linearized problem. The main result, Theorem 2.4, splits these four eigenvalues into a Benjamin–Feir pair, governed by an explicit discriminant whose leading sign is the product of three polynomials in (κ,b), and a long-wave pair, which is purely imaginary and has the singular O(√µ) scale. Corollaries give an instability criterion, a figure-eight geometry, and an exact non-resonant phase diagram containing a bounded bending-induced stability island. The paper includes detailed appendices with the Stokes expansion, the generalized kernel, and the Kato-basis expansions, and it checks consistency with the deep-water gravity and gravity-capillary limits.

Significance. If the coefficient computations are correct, this is a substantial Euler-level extension of the Benjamin–Feir theory to hydroelastic waves. The explicit two-parameter stability diagram, the identification of a bending-induced stability island, and the proof that the infinite-depth long-wave scale changes from O(µ) to O(√µ) are genuinely new and physically relevant. The paper is largely self-contained and derives all coefficients from the Euler system without fitted parameters; the agreement with the known pure-gravity and gravity-capillary limiting results is a genuine consistency check. The main risk is not conceptual but computational: the central coefficients e11, e12, e22 are assembled from long hand algebra, and the manuscript currently contains internal sign and factor inconsistencies in exactly this part of the proof. Those issues, and the absence of an independent symbolic check of the long coefficient lists, are the reason I cannot recommend acceptance in the present form.

major comments (3)

[§4 (Lemmas 4.2, 4.8, 4.9, 4.11; Lemma D.3; proof of Proposition 4.7)] The γ-dependence of the first-order Floquet corrections is internally inconsistent, and this inconsistency is load-bearing because it feeds into e22 and hence into the discriminant Δ_BF. Lemma 4.2, Eqs. (4.3)–(4.4), expands f+1 and f-1 with a coefficient iµ/(4γ_κ,b), but Lemma D.3, Lemma 4.9, and Lemma 4.11 all require the coefficient iµ γ_κ,b/4; for instance Lemma D.3 states P0,0 f+1 = iγ_κ,b/4 f+−1, and Lemma 4.9's diagonal entry −(γ_κ,b c_κ,b/4)µ² is obtained precisely with the γ/4 normalization. With the printed Lemma 4.2 normalization, the µ² coefficient from the B_ε block would be c/(8γ²) rather than the printed ζ, and with the correct normalization it should be γ²c/8. The displayed definition ζ_κ,b = 1/(8c_κ,b γ²_κ,b) is therefore not the value used in the final identity ζ − γc/4 + σs = −e22/8 in the proof of Proposition 4.7. Concretely, at (κ,b) = (0,0.1), the displayed ζ gives ζ − γc/4 + σs ≈ 0.474, while −e22/8 ≈ 0.233; replacing ζ by γ²c/8 gives 0.233. The authors should correct the normalization in Lemma 4.2, Lemma 4.8, and the statement of ζ, and then re-derive e22 and all entries of the reduced matrix (4.40).
[Theorem 2.1, Eq. (2.14); §3] The formula for c2 in (2.14) is printed in a way that contradicts the identity e11 = 2c2 used in Section 3. Under the natural reading c2 = −(88b² − 6bκ − 54b + 2κ² + κ + 8)/(16c_κ,b(14b+2κ−1)), the bκ term has the opposite sign from P11/16 in (2.80)–(2.81). At (κ,b) = (1,0.1) this gives c2 ≈ −0.1057, whereas e11/2 ≈ −0.1272; the identity e11 = 2c2 therefore fails for κ ≠ 0. Since c2 enters Lemma 2.2 through p2[0] = c2 + c_κ,b and propagates into the B_ε expansion and ultimately into e11, the sign in (2.14) must be corrected and all quantities derived from c2 rechecked. The authors should also add explicit parentheses around the numerator of (2.14) to remove the ambiguity in the present typesetting.
[Appendices B and D; Proposition 4.7] Given the concrete inconsistencies above and the length of the hand algebra, I ask the authors to provide an independent symbolic verification of the coefficient lists in Appendices B and D and of the identities in the proof of Proposition 4.7, for instance using a computer algebra system. The pure-gravity and zero-bending checks reported in the introduction only test the boundary b = 0 and the single point (κ,b) = (0,0); they cannot certify the interior of the (κ,b)-plane where the stability island and the transition curves P11 = 0, P22 = 0 live. Such a check is not a formality: a single sign or factor error in p2[2], a2[2], β2, or the Kato-basis derivatives would shift Δ_BF and invalidate the phase diagram even if the four-eigenvalue block structure were unchanged.

minor comments (4)

[Theorem 2.1, Eq. (2.14)] The typesetting of the fraction for c2 makes the sign of the numerator ambiguous; please display it with an explicit large parenthesis after the initial minus sign.
[Lemma 4.2, Eqs. (4.3)–(4.6)] Please harmonize the notation for the µ-corrections of f±1 with the formulas in Lemma D.3, Lemma 4.9, and Lemma 4.11; the reader should not have to infer from later lemmas that the printed iµ/(4γ_κ,b) is a typo for iµγ_κ,b/4.
[Section 3, after Proposition 3.3] The sentence 'this conclusion holds ... whenever e11 = 2c2 ≠ 0' should be accompanied by a cross-reference to (2.14) and (1.3), with the sign conventions made explicit, so that the claimed identity can be checked directly.
[Figure 2] Consider adding a zoomed inset around the stability island Sisland in the pure-bending slice, because at the scale of the full diagram the island is nearly invisible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central coefficients are derived in-paper from the hydroelastic Euler system, with self-citations used only as consistency checks.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 2.4, is derived from the linearized hydroelastic Euler system via Kato spectral projection, a finite-dimensional Hamiltonian-reversible reduction, and explicit second-order expansions. The reduced coefficients e11, e12, e22 are defined in Proposition 4.7 and computed from the paper's own Stokes-wave expansions (Lemma 2.2), the flattening maps, the operator expansions for beta_epsilon and tau_epsilon, and the Kato basis expansions (Lemmas 4.2, 4.5, and Appendix D). No parameter is fitted to data or to the target stability diagram; the discriminant Delta_BF and the phase diagram of Proposition 2.8 are algebraic consequences of these coefficients. Self-citations [37,38,39] are used only for comparison: the zero-bending limit is checked against the independent deep-water gravity-capillary result [39] and the deep-water gravity expansion [13], while the finite-depth hydroelastic paper [38] is explicitly stated not to be the source of the infinite-depth result, whose singular O(sqrt(mu)) long-wave scale is derived from the zero mode |mu| of the Dirichlet-Neumann symbol. The existence of the Stokes branch is obtained from the standard Crandall-Rabinowitz theorem, and the generalized kernel is proved in Appendix C by explicit differentiation of the stationary system, not imported as an assumption. No definitional circularity, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain is present. The residual risk of algebraic slips in long coefficient lists is a correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All coefficients e11,e12,e22 and the phase diagram are derived from the hydroelastic Euler system; there are no fitted free parameters and no new physical entities. The axioms are standard spectral and bifurcation tools plus the Toland membrane model, the non-resonance assumption, and the one-sided analytic continuation of |D+mu|. These are stated and located in the paper.

assumptions (5)

standard math Kato perturbation theory: the Riesz projection P_{mu,epsilon} is analytic and V_{mu,epsilon} has dimension 4 for small (mu,epsilon).
Invoked in Lemma 3.1, whose proof is skipped by reference to [13, Lemma 3.1]; the whole reduction to a 4x4 matrix depends on this.
standard math Crandall-Rabinowitz bifurcation: non-resonant parameters admit a unique real-analytic small-amplitude Stokes branch.
Theorem 2.1 and Appendix A; all expansions are on this branch.
domain assumption Toland membrane model surface energy with quadratic curvature term is the correct hydroelastic description.
Used in the definition of the fourth-order restoring operator; the spectral conclusions concern this model.
domain assumption Non-resonance condition (kappa,b) in P_infinity ensures a simple kernel in the even-odd symmetry class.
Defined in (1.1)-(1.2); all theorems exclude resonance curves and the phase diagram applies only in P_infinity.
domain assumption One-sided analytic continuation of |D+mu| via (2.67), with negative-mu physical spectrum recovered by the reality symmetry.
Needed for analytic perturbation theory; if the continuation introduced spurious eigenvalues, the complete-spectrum claim would fail.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modulational spectrum of infinite-depth hydroelastic Stokes waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/56VURL3N

@misc{pith2026260804938,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modulational spectrum of infinite-depth hydroelastic Stokes waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/56VURL3N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04938}
}

abstract

We determine the complete local Bloch spectrum bifurcating from the origin for small-amplitude periodic hydroelastic Stokes waves in infinite depth, under the combined effects of gravity, surface tension, and elastic bending. Away from the Wilton-type resonance set, we construct a real-analytic Stokes-wave branch and analyze the four eigenvalues emerging from the defective zero eigenvalue of the linearized hydroelastic Euler system. Using analytic spectral perturbation theory and Hamiltonian-reversible reductions, we decouple them into a Benjamin--Feir pair and a long-wave pair. The long-wave pair remains purely imaginary and has the singular scale $\cO(\sqrt{|\mu|})$, whereas the Benjamin--Feir pair is governed by an explicit discriminant whose leading sign yields a sharp criterion for modulational stability and instability. We derive the exact non-resonant phase diagram in the surface-tension-bending parameter plane and identify a bounded stability island generated by elastic bending. In the unstable region, and away from a drift degeneracy, the Benjamin--Feir branches form a local figure-eight curve. In the zero-bending limit, the reduced coefficients recover the known deep-water gravity and gravity-capillary results, while the change from the finite-depth $\cO(|\mu|)$ long-wave scale to $\cO(\sqrt{|\mu|})$ shows that the infinite-depth problem is singular.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04938 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Leading-order Benjamin–Feir stability diagram in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

[2]

Ablowitz and H

M. Ablowitz and H. Segur.On the evolution of packets of water waves, J. Fluid Mech. 92(4), 691–715, 1979

1979
[1]

R. Denk, M. M¨ oller and C. Tretter.The spectrum of the multiplication operator associated with a family of operators in a Banach space, inOperator theory in Krein spaces and nonlinear eigenvalue problems, 103–116, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 162, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2006

work page 2006
[3]

Ahmad and M.D

R. Ahmad and M.D. Groves.Spatial dynamics and solitary hydroelastic surface waves. Water Waves. 6, 1, 5–47, 2024

work page 2024
[4]

Akers, D.M

B.F. Akers, D.M. Ambrose, D.W. Sulon.Periodic traveling interfacial hydroelastic waves with or without mass. Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik. 68, 6, 141, 2017

work page 2017
[5]

Akers, D.M

B.F. Akers, D.M. Ambrose, D.W. Sulon.Periodic travelling interfacial hydroelastic waves with or without mass II: multiple bifurcations and ripples. European Journal of Applied Mathematics. 30, 4, 756–790, 2019

work page 2019
[6]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, E. Haus, and R. Montalto.Time quasi-periodic gravity water waves in finite depth, Inventiones Math. Volume 214 Number 2, pp. 739-911, 2018

2018
[7]

Baldi, J.F

P. Baldi, J.F. TolandSteady periodic water waves under nonlinear elastic membranes, J. Reine Angew. Math. Volume 652, pp. 67–112, 2011

work page 2011
[8]

Blyth, E.I

M.G. Blyth, E.I. P˘ ar˘ au, and Z. Wang.Stability of hydroelastic waves in deep water. Water Waves 6, 169–189, 2024

work page 2024

Show all 68 references

[9]

Benjamin.Instability of periodic wavetrains in nonlinear dispersive systems, Proc

T. Benjamin.Instability of periodic wavetrains in nonlinear dispersive systems, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. Volume 299 Issue 1456, 1967

1967
[10]

Benjamin and J

T. Benjamin and J. Feir.The disintegration of wave trains on deep water, Part 1. Theory. J. Fluid Mech. 27(3): 417-430, 1967. 49

1967
[11]

Berti, L

M. Berti, L. Corsi, A. Maspero, P. Ventura.Infinitely many isolas of modulational instability of Stokes waves.arXiv, 2024

2024
[12]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero, AM. RadakovicMcLean resonances and3 d spectral instability of Stokes waves.arXiv:2607.01939, 2026

2026 arXiv
[13]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero and P. Ventura.Full description of Benjamin–Feir instability of Stokes waves in deep water, Inventiones Math., 230, 651–711, 2022

2022
[14]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero and P. Ventura.On the analyticity of the Dirichlet-Neumann operator and Stokes waves, Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl., 33, 611–650, 2022

2022
[15]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero and P. Ventura.Benjamin-Feir instability of Stokes waves in finite depth, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 247, 91, 2023

2023
[16]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero and P. Ventura.Stokes waves at the critical depth are modulationally unstable, Comm. Math. Phys., 405:56, 2024

2024
[17]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero and P. Ventura.First isola of modulational instability of Stokes waves in deep water, EMS Surv. Math. Sci. 12, 79–122, European Mathematical Society DOI 10.4171/EMSS/91, 2025

2025 doi
[18]

Bridges and A

T. Bridges and A. Mielke.A proof of the Benjamin-Feir instability.Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 133(2): 145–198, 1995

1995
[19]

Chen and Q

G. Chen and Q. Su.Nonlinear modulational instability of the Stokes waves in 2d full water waves.Commun. Math. Phys, 1345–1452, 2023

2023
[20]

Craig and C

W. Craig and C. Sulem.Numerical simulation of gravity waves.J. Comput. Phys., 108(1): 73–83, 1993

1993
[21]

Creedon, B

R. Creedon, B. Deconinck.A High-Order Asymptotic Analysis of the Benjamin-Feir Instability Spectrum in Arbitrary Depth, J. Fluid Mech. 956, A29, 2023

2023
[22]

Creedon, B

R. Creedon, B. Deconinck., O. Trichtchenko.High-Frequency Instabilities of Stokes Waves, J. Fluid Mech. 937, A24, 2022

2022
[23]

R. P. Creedon, H. Q. Nguyen, and W. A. Strauss.Proof of the transverse instability of Stokes waves, Annals of PDE, 11:4, 2025

2025
[24]

R. P. Creedon, H. Q. Nguyen, and W. A. Strauss.Transverse Instability of Stokes Waves at Finite Depth, ArXiv, arXiv:2408.07169, 2024

2024
[25]

Dammann, M.A

D.O. Dammann, M.A. Johnson, A.R. Mahoney, and E.R. FeddersFirst observations of sea ice flexural–gravity waves with ground-based radar interferometry in Utqia˙ gvik, Alaska.The Cryosphere. 17, 4, 1609–1622, 2023

2023
[26]

Deconinck and K

B. Deconinck and K. Oliveras.The instability of periodic surface gravity waves.J. Fluid Mech., 675: 141–167, 2011

2011
[27]

Deconinck, O

B. Deconinck, O. Trichtchenko.Stability of periodic gravity waves in the presence of surface tension.European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, Volume 46, 97-108, 2014

2014
[28]

Deike, J.-C

L. Deike, J.-C. Bacri, and E. FalconNonlinear waves on the surface of a fluid covered by an elastic sheet, Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 733, 394–413, 2013

2013
[29]

Deike, M

L. Deike, M. Berhanu, and E. FalconExperimental observation of hydroelastic three-wave interactions, Physical Review Fluids. 2, 6, 064803, 2017

2017
[30]

V. D. Djordjevic and L. G. Redekopp.On two-dimensional packets of capillary-gravity waves, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 79(4): 703–71, 1977

1977
[31]

Groves, B

M. Groves, B. Hewer, and E. Wahl´ en.Variational existence theory for hydroelastic solitary waves.Comptes Rendus Mathema- tique. 354, 11, 1078–1086, 2016

2016
[32]

Guyenne and E.I

P. Guyenne and E.I. P˘ ar˘ au.Computations of fully nonlinear hydroelastic solitary waves on deep water.Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 713, 307–329, 2012

2012
[33]

Haragus, T

M. Haragus, T. Truong and E. Wahl´ en.Transverse Dynamics of Two-Dimensional Traveling Periodic Gravity–Capillary Water Waves. Water Waves 5, 65–99, 2023

2023
[34]

Hur and Z

V. Hur and Z. Yang.Unstable Stokes waves. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 247, 62, 2023

2023
[35]

Hur and Z

V. Hur and Z. Yang.Stable and unstable capillary-gravity waves. arXiv:2311.01368, 2023

2023 arXiv
[36]

Hsiao.Unstable Stokes waves in constant vorticity flows

T.-Y. Hsiao.Unstable Stokes waves in constant vorticity flows. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign) 2024

2024
[37]

Hsiao and A

T.-Y. Hsiao and A. Maspero.Full Benjamin-Feir instability of capillary-gravity Stokes waves in finite depth. arXiv:2510.23456. Communications in Mathematical Physics, accepted for publication (2026)

2026
[38]

Hsiao, Z

T.-Y. Hsiao, Z. Li, Y. Zhang, and C. Zhu.Benjamin–Feir spectrum of hydroelastic Stokes waves. arXiv:2606.09657, 2026

2026 arXiv
[39]

Hsiao and X

T.-Y. Hsiao and X. Wang.Spectral structure of the Benjamin-Feir instability in deep-water gravity-capillary Stokes waves. arXiv:2604.16724, 2026

2026 arXiv
[40]

Jiao, L.M

Z. Jiao, L.M. Rodrigues, C. Sun, Z. Yang.Small-amplitude finite-depth Stokes waves are transversally unstable, Comm. Math. Phys., 406, pages 255, 2025

2025
[41]

Kato.Perturbation theory for linear operators

T. Kato.Perturbation theory for linear operators. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 132 Springer- Verlag New York, Inc., New York, 1966

1966
[42]

Korobkin, E.I

A. Korobkin, E.I. P˘ ar˘ au, and J.-M. Vanden-BroeckThe mathematical challenges and modelling of hydroelasticity, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 369, 1947, 2803–2812, 2011

1947
[43]

Lannes.Well-posedness of the water-waves equations,J

D. Lannes.Well-posedness of the water-waves equations,J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 , pp. 605-654, 2005

2005
[44]

Lannes.The water waves problem

D. Lannes.The water waves problem. Mathematical analysis and asymptotics. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 188. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2013. xx+321 pp

2013
[45]

Levi-Civita.D´ etermination rigoureuse des ondes permanentes d’ ampleur finie,Math

T. Levi-Civita.D´ etermination rigoureuse des ondes permanentes d’ ampleur finie,Math. Ann. 93 , pp. 264-314, 1925

1925
[46]

M. J. Lighthill.Contribution to the theory of waves in nonlinear dispersive systems, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1, 3, 269-306, 1965. 50

1965
[47]

J. W. McLean.Instabilities of finite-amplitude water waves, J. Fluid Mech. 114, 315-330, 1982

1982
[48]

J. W. McLean.Instabilities of finite-amplitude gravity waves on water of infinite depth, J. Fluid Mech. 114, 331-341, 1982

1982
[49]

Milewski, J.-M

P.A. Milewski, J.-M. Vanden-Broeck, and Z. WangHydroelastic solitary waves in deep water, J. Fluid Mech. 679, 628–640, 2011

2011
[50]

Nekrasov.On steady waves

A. Nekrasov.On steady waves. Izv. Ivanovo-Voznesenk. Politekhn. 3, 1921

1921
[51]

Nguyen and W

H. Nguyen and W. Strauss.Proof of modulational instability of Stokes waves in deep water. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., Volume 76, Issue 5, 899–1136, 2023

2023
[52]

Ono-dit-Biot, M

J.-C. Ono-dit-Biot, M. Trejo, E. Loukiantcheko, M. Lauch, E. Rapha¨ el, K. Dalnoki-Veress, and T. Salez.Hydroelastic wake on a thin elastic sheet floating on water. Physical Review Fluids. 4, 1, 014808, 2019

2019
[53]

M. Reed, B. SimonMethods of modern mathematical physics. IV. Analysis of operators, Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], New York, 1978

1978
[54]

Reeder, M

J. Reeder, M. Shinbrot.Analytic Branches of Resonant Waves., ARMA 77, 289–309, 1981

1981
[55]

SquireOf ocean waves and sea-ice revisited

V.A. SquireOf ocean waves and sea-ice revisited. Cold Regions Science and Technology. 49, 2, 110–133, 2007

2007
[56]

Squire, J.P

V.A. Squire, J.P. Dugan, P. Wadhams, P. Rottier, and A.K. LiuOf ocean waves and sea ice. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 27, 1, 115–168, 1995

1995
[57]

Stokes.On the theory of oscillatory waves

G. Stokes.On the theory of oscillatory waves. Trans. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 8: 441–455, 1847
[58]

Struik.D´ etermination rigoureuse des ondes irrotationelles p´ eriodiques dans un canal ´ a profondeur finie

D. Struik.D´ etermination rigoureuse des ondes irrotationelles p´ eriodiques dans un canal ´ a profondeur finie. Math. Ann. 95: 595–634, 1926

1926
[59]

C. Sun, E. Wahl´ enOn the spectral stability of the periodic capillary-gravity waves. arXiv:2509.17534, 2025

2025
[60]

Toland.Steady periodic hydroelastic waves, Archive for rational mechanics and analysis

J.F. Toland.Steady periodic hydroelastic waves, Archive for rational mechanics and analysis. 189, 2, 325–362, 2008

2008
[61]

Trichtchenko, P

O. Trichtchenko, P. Milewski, E. P˘ ar˘ au, and J.-M. Vanden-Broeck.Stability of periodic traveling flexural-gravity waves in two dimensions, Studies in Applied Mathematics. 142, 1, 65–90, 2019

2019
[62]

Wan and J

L. Wan and J. YangNonlinear modulational instability of two-dimensional deep hydroelastic Stokes waves.arXiv:2603.28024, 2026

2026
[63]

Wilton.On ripples.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science (6), 29(173), 688–700, 1915

J.R. Wilton.On ripples.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science (6), 29(173), 688–700, 1915

1915
[64]

Whitham.Non-linear dispersion of water waves

G.B. Whitham.Non-linear dispersion of water waves. J. Fluid Mech, volume 26 part 2 pp. 399-412, 1967

1967
[65]

Yang.An alternative proof of modulation instability of Stokes waves in deep waterarXiv, 2021

Z. Yang.An alternative proof of modulation instability of Stokes waves in deep waterarXiv, 2021

2021
[66]

Zakharov.Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid

V. Zakharov.Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 9, 190-194, 1968

1968
[67]

Zakharov.Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of deep fluid

V. Zakharov.Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of deep fluid. Zhurnal Prikladnoi Mekhaniki i Teckhnicheskoi Fiziki 9(2): 86–94, 1969

1969
[68]

Zakharov and V

V. Zakharov and V. Kharitonov.Instability of monochromatic waves on the surface of a liquid of arbitrary depth. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 11, 747-751, 1970. 51

1970

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Ablowitz and H

M. Ablowitz and H. Segur.On the evolution of packets of water waves, J. Fluid Mech. 92(4), 691–715, 1979

1979

[2] [1]

R. Denk, M. M¨ oller and C. Tretter.The spectrum of the multiplication operator associated with a family of operators in a Banach space, inOperator theory in Krein spaces and nonlinear eigenvalue problems, 103–116, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., 162, Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2006

work page 2006

[3] [3]

Ahmad and M.D

R. Ahmad and M.D. Groves.Spatial dynamics and solitary hydroelastic surface waves. Water Waves. 6, 1, 5–47, 2024

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Akers, D.M

B.F. Akers, D.M. Ambrose, D.W. Sulon.Periodic traveling interfacial hydroelastic waves with or without mass. Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik. 68, 6, 141, 2017

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Akers, D.M

B.F. Akers, D.M. Ambrose, D.W. Sulon.Periodic travelling interfacial hydroelastic waves with or without mass II: multiple bifurcations and ripples. European Journal of Applied Mathematics. 30, 4, 756–790, 2019

work page 2019

[6] [6]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, E. Haus, and R. Montalto.Time quasi-periodic gravity water waves in finite depth, Inventiones Math. Volume 214 Number 2, pp. 739-911, 2018

2018

[7] [7]

Baldi, J.F

P. Baldi, J.F. TolandSteady periodic water waves under nonlinear elastic membranes, J. Reine Angew. Math. Volume 652, pp. 67–112, 2011

work page 2011

[8] [8]

Blyth, E.I

M.G. Blyth, E.I. P˘ ar˘ au, and Z. Wang.Stability of hydroelastic waves in deep water. Water Waves 6, 169–189, 2024

work page 2024