Arbitrary Polynomial Decay Rates of Neutral, Collisionless Plasmas

Grace Mattingly; Jonathan Ben-Artzi; Stephen Pankavich

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Arbitrary Polynomial Decay Rates of Neutral, Collisionless Plasmas

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A neutral plasma can be made to decay at any polynomial rate.

desk verdict The inductive decay machinery is the real contribution; the existence step in Theorem 1.3 leans on an unverified scattering-map application that is probably repairable but must be fixed before the result stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02678 v1 pith:5BSNY3MG submitted 2025-02-04 math.AP

Grace Mattingly , Stephen Pankavich , Jonathan Ben-Artzi This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q8335B4082D10

keywords Vlasov–Poissonsystemcollisionlessplasmaneutralpolynomialdecayrateschargecancellationlinearscatteringpolyhomogeneousexpansionasymptoticprofiles

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that a neutral, collisionless plasma in three dimensions can settle to zero at any prescribed polynomial rate, not just the generic dispersive rates $t^{-3}$ for charge density and $t^{-2}$ for electric field. The rate is set by the first nonvanishing moment of the limiting charge density: if the first $n+1$ such moments vanish, the density decays like $t^{-n-4}$ and the field like $t^{-n-3}$. For every integer $m$, the authors construct nontrivial solutions realizing exactly the rates $t^{-m-3}$ and $t^{-m-2}$; for $m\ge 1$ the distribution functions scatter linearly to free transport at rate $t^{-m}$, while for $m=0$ scattering is modified by a logarithmic correction. This fills the gap between slow dispersive decay on whole space and exponential phase mixing on the torus, and it exhibits infinitely many distinct asymptotic profiles.

What carries the argument

The central object is the translated distribution $g^\alpha(t,x,v)=f^\alpha(t,x+vt,v)$ and its spatial-moment coefficients $F^{\alpha,\ell}(t,v)=\sum_{|\beta|=\ell}\frac{1}{\beta!}\int(-y)^\beta D_v^\beta g^\alpha(t,y,v)\,dy$. A Taylor expansion of $g^\alpha$ in the velocity argument turns the charge density into a sum of $t^{-\ell}\rho_\ell(t,x)$, whose limits $\rho_{\ell,\infty}$ are the asymptotic profiles. The field-decay assumption (A) keeps the spatial support of $g^\alpha$ bounded, which controls the Taylor remainder and the derivative norms $G^k_v$ and $G^k_{x,v}$; with those bounds, an induction over $\ell$ shows that each vanishing moment improves the decay by one power of $t$ and determines the next profile.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the Vlasov-Poisson system for a two-species neutral plasma whose limiting spatial distributions are Gaussians with equal means but different variances, as described in Remark 1.4; the paper predicts $\|E(t)\|_{\infty}\sim t^{-3}$, so observing the dispersive $t^{-2}$ rate would refute Theorem 1.3. A separate check is whether the compactly supported limiting states built with Gegenbauer polynomials satisfy the smallness hypothesis of the cited scattering-map theorem; if they do not, the existence step is unsupported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.3: for every $m\in\mathbb{N}_0$ there exist nontrivial solutions in $C^{m+1}((0,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}^6)$ of the multispecies Vlasov-Poisson system with zero total net charge such that $\|\rho(t)\|_{\infty}\sim t^{-m-3}$ and $\|E(t)\|_{\infty}\sim t^{-m-2}$; for $m\ge 1$ all derivatives $\nabla_x^k E$ up to order $m$ decay like $t^{-m-3}$, and $f^\alpha(t,x+vt,v)\to f^\alpha_\infty(x,v)$ in $L^\infty$ at rate $t^{-m}$. The mechanism is charge cancellation in the limiting spatial averages: the functions $F^{\alpha,\ell}_\infty$ and the associated densities $\rho_{\ell,\infty}$ form the coefficients of a polyhomogeneous expansion of $\rho$ and $E$, and each vanishing coefficient buys one extra power of time decay. Theorem 1.4 propagates this by induction: assuming $\rho_{\ell,\infty}\equiv 0$ for $\ell=0,\ldots,n$ yields the next-order convergence at rate $t^{-1}$ and uniform bounds on all relevant derivatives of the translated distribution. The paper states this is the first construction of nontrivial decay faster than the dispersive rates for the Vlasov-Poisson system in $\mathbb{R}^3$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the electric field decaying at least as fast as $t^{-5/3}$ and on the scattering-map theorem supplying a true solution from each constructed asymptotic state; if either fails, the existence claim in Theorem 1.3 collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every $m\ge 0$ there are nontrivial neutral solutions whose charge density and electric field decay exactly like $t^{-m-3}$ and $t^{-m-2}$, respectively, so no single universal polynomial rate governs neutral plasmas.
For $m\ge 1$ the particle distribution scatters linearly at rate $t^{-m}$, while the $m=0$ case scatters in the modified sense with a logarithmic correction; these are the only two scattering behaviors that occur.
If $\rho_{0,\infty},\ldots,\rho_{n,\infty}$ all vanish, then $\|\rho(t)\|_{\infty}\lesssim t^{-n-4}$ and $\|E(t)\|_{\infty}\lesssim t^{-n-3}$, with the next profile $\rho_{n+1,\infty}$ determining the leading term.
The same induction yields bounds on all derivatives of the electric field and of the translated distribution, so the asymptotic profiles of $E$, $\nabla E$, $\rho$, and their derivatives are all identified.
The construction uses compactly supported data and, as the paper notes, the method extends to higher dimensions and to the small-data setting where assumption (A) is known to hold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The mechanism suggests a practical diagnostic: measuring the first nonvanishing limiting moment of the charge density of a neutral plasma would directly predict the long-time decay exponent of its field and density.
The two-species Gaussian example in the paper could be simulated numerically with compactly supported approximants; matching the predicted $t^{-3}$ field decay would confirm that the cancellation mechanism does not depend on the special Gegenbauer construction used in the proof.
If assumption (A) holds with $p$ only slightly above $5/3$, the support-growth estimates become marginal; whether the same decay hierarchy survives weaker field decay is left open by the paper and is a natural stress test.
An analogous hierarchy of polynomial rates may hold for relativistic Vlasov-Maxwell or screened Coulomb systems whenever a scattering map with suitable asymptotic states exists, as the authors suggest in a remark; that extension is not proved here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper's core achievement is a clean inductive framework showing that neutral Vlasov-Poisson solutions can have charge density and field decay at any prescribed polynomial rate, with linear scattering for the distribution function when the rate exceeds the dispersive one. The mechanism is charge cancellation through vanishing spatial moments of the asymptotic state, not dispersion. That is a genuine step beyond the known dispersive rates and beyond the base case in [31]. The Gegenbauer-polynomial construction of states with prescribed vanishing moments is elegant, and the estimates in Sections 2–4 are carefully and coherently derived. The rates are forced by the first nonvanishing moment, so there is no fitting to a target decay rate.

The soft spot is where the rubber meets the road: the existence part of Theorem 1.3. The authors build smooth compactly supported asymptotic states and then invoke the scattering map from [14] to produce global solutions that scatter to them. But they never check the hypotheses of that theorem. In particular, the scattering map in [14] is stated for small asymptotic states in a suitable norm, and the constructed states have arbitrary amplitude; nothing is rescaled. Also, the scattering map yields initial data that are not obviously compactly supported, while Theorem 1.4—which supplies the rates—explicitly requires compactly supported initial data. The moment conditions ρℓ,∞ = 0 are verified for the asymptotic state by construction, but Theorem 1.4 needs those conditions to hold for the actual solution's limits F^α,ℓ_∞. That is likely true if the scattering construction is valid, but it is not shown. This is load-bearing: without it, Theorem 1.3 is an assertion about asymptotic states, not about genuine solutions.

The gap is specific and probably fixable—for example, by rescaling the constructed states to a sufficiently small amplitude if the [14] norm is homogeneous, and by checking or working around the compact-support issue. But as written, the existence claim is unproven. The rest of the paper—the inductive estimates, the derivative bounds, the scattering statements conditional on field decay—looks solid and written by people who know the material.

I would send this to a serious referee. The machinery deserves review and likely publication after a major revision that closes the scattering-map gap. For a reader in kinetic theory or asymptotic analysis, this is a valuable contribution even in its current state. I would cite the inductive framework, but only after the existence issue is sorted out.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the multispecies Vlasov-Poisson system in R^3 under a neutrality assumption M=0 and an electric-field decay assumption (A). The main analytic result, Theorem 1.4, shows that if the first n+1 asymptotic moment densities ρ_{ℓ,∞} vanish, then the charge density, electric field, and their derivatives admit sharp asymptotic profiles with rates t^{-n-4}, t^{-n-3}, etc., and the distribution functions scatter linearly. The companion result, Theorem 1.3, claims that for every m in N0 there exist nontrivial solutions realizing the decay rates ‖ρ(t)‖∞ ∼ t^{-m-3} and ‖E(t)‖∞ ∼ t^{-m-2}. Sections 2 and 4 develop a lengthy induction based on Taylor expansion of the translated distribution functions and on estimates for G^k_v and G^k_{x,v}; the proof of Theorem 1.4 is carried out in Section 3. The existence part of Theorem 1.3 is delegated to an external scattering map theorem [14] at the end of Section 3, and this delegation is not verified against the hypotheses used elsewhere in the paper.

Significance. If the claimed results hold, they provide, for the first time, a countably infinite family of sharp polynomial decay rates for neutral plasmas in R^3, interpolating between the standard dispersive rates and the much faster rates associated with phase mixing. The internal derivation is genuinely parameter-free: the decay rate is forced by the first nonvanishing moment of the asymptotic state, and no fitted parameters appear. The inductive scheme in Sections 2–4 is a substantial and coherent piece of analysis, and the paper is careful to identify which estimates are preliminary and which are sharp. The main weakness is the existence step for Theorem 1.3, which relies on an unverified application of the inverse scattering map of [14]; because the paper's own Theorem 1.4 requires compactly supported initial data and moment conditions on the actual evolved solution, this gap is load-bearing. The result is likely repairable, but the manuscript as written does not close the existence argument.

major comments (3)

[Section 3, final paragraph (proof of Theorem 1.3)] The existence assertion for every m in N0 rests on the sentence invoking [14, Theorem 1.1(ii) and Remark 1.2(5)], but the hypotheses of that scattering map are not stated and are not verified for the constructed states f^α_{m,∞}=φ^α_m(x)ψ_m(v). In particular, the paper does not check the required smallness condition of [14] for these compactly supported profiles, and it does not check that the initial data produced by the scattering map are compactly supported. This matters for two reasons: Theorem 1.4 is stated only for initial data in C^{n+2}_c(R^6), and its proof repeatedly uses compact support (Lemma 2.1 and the uniform spatial support bound (17)); moreover, compact support of the asymptotic state f_∞ does not imply compact support of the initial data obtained from an inverse scattering construction. The existence claim of Theorem 1.3 is therefore not proved as written. The gap is likely repairable either by stating and verifying the hypotheses of [14] (for instance, by a small-amplitude rescaling if the relevant norm is homogeneous) or by an independent constructive argument, but the present text does not supply such a verification.
[Section 3, final paragraph and Theorem 1.4] The application of the scattering map must also ensure that the conditions ρ_{ℓ,∞}≡0 for ℓ≤n hold for the actual evolved solution, not merely for the prescribed profile f^α_{m,∞}. Theorem 1.4 assumes these conditions for the solution and later identifies F^{α,ℓ}_∞ with moments of f^α_∞ through equation (11). If [14] supplies only L∞ scattering of f^α, or scattering in a norm that does not control the derivatives appearing in the definitions (9) and (11), then the moment limits of the evolved solution might differ from the moments of the constructed f^α_{m,∞}. The compact support of the prescribed profile does not by itself guarantee the needed vanishing of the evolved solution's moments. The proof should either quote a derivative-scattering statement from [14]/[38] that covers these moments or justify the moment limits directly.
[Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.3, m=0 case] For m=0 the construction chooses nonnegative ψ^α_0 satisfying Σ_α q_α ψ^α_0(v)=η(v), where η is an arbitrary C^1_c function with zero integral. Such a representation requires an explicit feasibility argument when the charges q_α have mixed signs, since the right-hand side must be decomposable into nonnegative compactly supported pieces with the prescribed charges. A short argument, for example choosing large common nonnegative profiles and then adding small signed corrections, would make the construction complete; as written the constraint is asserted without proof.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3, proof of Theorem 1.3] In the definition of Φ_m(x), the expression '/BD_{[-1,1]}' appears to be a typographical error for the indicator function 1_{[-1,1]}; please correct the notation.
[Reference list] Reference [22] contains the typo 'Arsigmave for rational mechanics and analysis'; this should read 'Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis'.
[Remark 1.4] In the first bullet, the informal phrase 'the distributions don't overlap much at all' is imprecise; the vanishing of ρ_{0,∞} in that case follows from the normalization ∫(f^+ - f^-) dx = 0 regardless of the means, so the wording could be clarified.
[Theorem 1.3, m=0 case] The statement uses the notation f^α_∞ ∈ C^m_c(R^6) with m=0; this is acceptable but slightly nonstandard, and it may be clearer to write C^0_c or to state the regularity separately for the m=0 case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: decay rates are consequences of prescribed asymptotic moments and an independent induction; the unverified [14] application is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular: Theorem 1.3's rates are not fitted parameters but are forced by the first nonvanishing moment of a prescribed asymptotic state. The paper constructs f^α_{m,∞} with ∫ x^β μ_m(x) dx = 0 for |β| < m and nonzero for β = (m,0,0), so ρ_{ℓ,∞} ≡ 0 for ℓ < m and ρ_{m,∞} ≠ 0. Theorem 1.4 then proves, by induction and Taylor expansion, that any solution satisfying these moment conditions has ρ ~ t^{-m-3} and E ~ t^{-m-2}. No equation in the proof assumes the target rate; assumption (A) is an input hypothesis, not a fitted value. The use of [31] is a self-citation, but [31] is an independent prior theorem proving the base modified-scattering estimates and does not rely on the present conclusions. The scattering-map invocation of [14] and [38] is external. A genuine gap exists: the paper does not verify [14]'s smallness hypothesis for the constructed states, nor that the resulting Cauchy data are compactly supported, both of which are needed for Theorem 1.4; however, this is a hypothesis-checking omission, not a definitional equivalence or a fitted input renamed as a prediction, so it does not constitute circularity under the hard rules.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the explicit field decay assumption (A), the external scattering map theorem [14], standard global existence, and the moment-vanishing hypotheses. No free parameters are fitted, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The electric field decays at a rate ||E(t)||_infty <= C t^{-p} for some p>5/3 (assumption (A)).
Stated in Section 1.1; the entire analysis of translated distributions and boundedness of phase-space support depends on this. It is known for small-data and spherically-symmetric solutions but not for general data.
domain assumption The scattering map theorem of [14] applies to the constructed asymptotic states f^alpha_{m,infty}.
In the proof of Theorem 1.3, the authors invoke [14, Theorem 1.1(ii)] to obtain a solution associated to the constructed scattering state, without verifying the theorem's hypotheses (e.g., smallness). This is a load-bearing external theorem.
domain assumption Global existence of smooth solutions for compactly supported initial data.
Standard global well-posedness for the Vlasov-Poisson system, cited from [26,33,35]; used throughout the paper.
domain assumption Neutrality M=0 and, in Theorem 1.4, the vanishing of moments rho_{ell,infty} identically 0 for ell=0..n.
Assumed hypotheses of the main theorems; they define the regime of interest and are used to bootstrap the induction.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Arbitrary Polynomial Decay Rates of Neutral, Collisionless Plasmas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BSNY3MG

@misc{pith2026250202678,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Arbitrary Polynomial Decay Rates of Neutral, Collisionless Plasmas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BSNY3MG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02678}
}

abstract

A multispecies, collisionless plasma is modeled by the Vlasov-Poisson system. Assuming the plasma is neutral and the electric field decays with sufficient rapidity as $t \to\infty$, we show that solutions can be constructed with arbitrarily fast, polynomial rates of decay, depending upon the properties of the limiting spatial average and its derivatives. In doing so, we establish, for the first time, a countably infinite number of asymptotic profiles for the charge density, electric field, and their derivatives, each of which is necessarily realized by a sufficiently smooth solution and exceeds the established dispersive decay rates. Finally, in each case we establish a linear $L^\infty$ scattering result for every particle distribution function, namely we show that they converge as $t \to \infty$ along the transported spatial characteristics at increasingly faster rates.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[31]

Pankavich, S., Asymptotic Dynamics of Dispersive, Col lisionless Plasmas. Comm. Math. Phys. 2022 391: 455-493

work page 2022
[14]

et al., Scattering M ap for the Vlasov-Poisson System, Peking Math J

Flynn, P., Ouyang, Z., Pausader, B. et al., Scattering M ap for the Vlasov-Poisson System, Peking Math J. 2023 6: 365-392

work page 2023
[38]

and Taylor, M., Inverse modiﬁed scattering a nd polyhomogeneous expansions for the Vlasov–Poisson syst em

Schlue, V. and Taylor, M., Inverse modiﬁed scattering a nd polyhomogeneous expansions for the Vlasov–Poisson syst em. arXiv:2404.15885 2024

arXiv 2024
[1]

and Stegun, I., Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables

Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I., Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Dover (9th Ed) 1964

work page 1964
[2]

and Degond, P., Global existence for the Vlaso v-Poisson equation in 3 space variables with small initial d ata

Bardos, C. and Degond, P., Global existence for the Vlaso v-Poisson equation in 3 space variables with small initial d ata. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire1985, 2(2): 101-118

work page
[3]

Advances in Diﬀerential Equations 1998, 3: 271-292

Batt, J., Kunze, M., and Rein, G., On the asymptotic behav ior of a one-dimensional, monocharged plasma and a rescalin g method. Advances in Diﬀerential Equations 1998, 3: 271-292

work page 1998
[4]

Communications on Pure and Applied Mathemat ics 2017, 71(3): 537-576

Bedrossian, J., Masmoudi, N., and Mouhot, C., Landau Dam ping in Finite Regularity for Unconﬁned Systems with Screen ed Interactions. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathemat ics 2017, 71(3): 537-576

work page 2017
[5]

Ben-Artzi, J., Calogero, S., and Pankavich, S., Arbitra rily large solutions of the Vlasov-Poisson system. SIAM J. M ath. Anal. 2018, 50(4): 4311-4326

work page 2018

Show all 40 references

[6]

Kinetic and Related Models 2024, 17(1): 29-51

Ben-Artzi, J., Morisse, B., and Pankavich, S., Asymptot ic Growth and Decay of Two-dimensional Symmetric Plasmas. Kinetic and Related Models 2024, 17(1): 29-51

2024
[7]

and Pankavich, S., Modiﬁed Scattering of S olutions to the Relativistic Vlasov-Maxwell System Inside the Light Cone, arXiv:2306.11725

Ben-Artzi, J. and Pankavich, S., Modiﬁed Scattering of S olutions to the Relativistic Vlasov-Maxwell System Inside the Light Cone, arXiv:2306.11725

arXiv
[8]

arXiv:2208.08360

Bigorgne, L., Global existence and modiﬁed scattering f or the solutions to the Vlasov-Maxwell system with a small di stri- bution function. arXiv:2208.08360

arXiv
[9]

arXiv:2312 .12214

Bigorgne, L., Scattering map for the Vlasov-Maxwell sys tem around source-free electromagnetic ﬁelds. arXiv:2312 .12214
[10]

and Ruiz R

Bigorgne, L. and Ruiz R. V., Late-time asymptotics of sm all data solutions for the Vlasov-Poisson system. arXiv:24 04.05812 2024

2024
[11]

Castella F., Propagation of space moments in the Vlasov -Poisson equation and further results. Ann. de l’Inst. Henr i Poincare-Anal. non lineaire 1999, 16: 503-533

1999
[12]

and Zhang, X., Global Existence to the Vlasov-P oisson System and Propagation of Moments Without Assumptio n of Finite Kinetic Energy

Chen, Z. and Zhang, X., Global Existence to the Vlasov-P oisson System and Propagation of Moments Without Assumptio n of Finite Kinetic Energy. Communications in Mathematical P hysics 2016, 343: 851-879

2016
[13]

and Kwon, S., Modiﬁed scattering for the Vlasov -Poisson system, Nonlinearity 2016 29: 2755

Choi, S. and Kwon, S., Modiﬁed scattering for the Vlasov -Poisson system, Nonlinearity 2016 29: 2755

2016
[15]

SIAM : 1996

Glassey, R., The Cauchy Problem in Kinetic Theory. SIAM : 1996

1996
[16]

Glassey, R., Pankavich, S., and Schaeﬀer, J., Decay in T ime for a One-Dimensional, Two Component Plasma. Math. Meth Appl. Sci. 2008, 31:2115-2132

2008
[17]

Kinetic and Related Models 2009, 2: 465-488

Glassey, R., Pankavich, S., and Schaeﬀer, J., On long-t ime behavior of monocharged and neutral plasma in one and one -half dimensions. Kinetic and Related Models 2009, 2: 465-488

2009
[18]

Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 2010, 68: 135-141

Glassey, R., Pankavich, S., and Schaeﬀer, J., Time Deca y for Solutions to the One-dimensional Equations of Plasma Dynamics. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 2010, 68: 135-141

2010
[19]

Diﬀerential & Integral Equations 2010 23: 61-77

Glassey, R., Pankavich, S., and Schaeﬀer, J., Large Tim e Behavior of the Relativistic Vlasov-Maxwell System in Low Space Dimension. Diﬀerential & Integral Equations 2010 23: 61-77

2010
[20]

Hormander, L., The Analysis of Linear Partial Diﬀerent ial Operators I: Distribution Theory and Fourier Analysis, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990

1990
[21]

Horst, E., Symmetric plasmas and their decay. Comm. Mat h. Phys. 1990, 126: 613-633

1990
[22]

Arsigmave for rational mech anics and analysis 2011, 200: 313-360

Hwang, H., Rendall, A., and Velazquez, J., Optimal grad ient estimates and asymptotic behaviour for the Vlasov-Poi sson system with small initial data. Arsigmave for rational mech anics and analysis 2011, 200: 313-360

2011
[23]

International Mathematics Research Notices 2022, 2022: 8865-8889

Ionescu, A., Pausader, B., W ang, X., Widmayer, K., On th e asymptotic behavior of solutions to the Vlasov-Poisson sy stem. International Mathematics Research Notices 2022, 2022: 8865-8889

2022
[24]

Annals of PDE 2024, 10(1), Article 2

Ionescu, A., Pausader, B., W ang, X., Widmayer, K., Nonl inear Landau Damping for the Vlasov-Poisson System in R3: The Poisson Equilibrium. Annals of PDE 2024, 10(1), Article 2

2024
[25]

D., Classical Electrodynamics

Jackson, J. D., Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley: 1999

1999
[26]

and Perthame, B., Propogation of moments an d regularity for the three dimensional Vlasov-Poisson syst em

Lions, P.L. and Perthame, B., Propogation of moments an d regularity for the three dimensional Vlasov-Poisson syst em. Invent. Math. 1991, 105: 415-430

1991
[27]

and Villani, C., On Landau damping

Mouhot, C. and Villani, C., On Landau damping. Acta Math 2011, 207, 29-201. 34

2011
[28]

Pallard, C., Space Moments of the Vlasov–Poisson Syste m: Propagation and Regularity. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 2014 46(3): 1754-1770

2014
[29]

Kinetic & Related Models 2011, 4(2): 549-567

Pallard, C., Growth estimates and uniform decay for a co llisionless plasma. Kinetic & Related Models 2011, 4(2): 549-567

2011
[30]

Pankavich, S., Exact Large Time Behavior of Sphericall y-Symmetric Plasmas. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 2021 53(4): 4474-4512

2021
[32]

Pankavich, S., Scattering and Asymptotic Behavior of S olutions to the Vlasov-Poisson system in High Dimension. SI AM J. Math. Anal. 2023 55(5): 4727-4750

2023
[33]

Pfaﬀelmoser, K., Global classical solution of the Vlas ov-Poisson system in three dimensions for general initial d ata. J. Diﬀ. Eq. 1992, 95(2): 281-303

1992
[34]

Rein G., Collisionless Kinetic Equations from Astroph ysics - The Vlasov-Poisson System, in Handbook of Diﬀerenti al Equations, Evolutionary Equations, 2007, Eds. C. M. Dafermos and E. Feireisl, Elsevier: 383-479

2007
[35]

PDE 1991, 16(8-9): 1313-1335

Schaeﬀer, J., Global existence of smooth solutions to t he Vlasov-Poisson system in three dimensions, Comm. PDE 1991, 16(8-9): 1313-1335

1991
[36]

Schaeﬀer, J., Asymptotic growth bounds for the Vlasov- Poisson system. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2011, 34: 262-277

2011
[37]

Schaeﬀer, J., Large-time behavior of a one-dimensiona l monocharged plasma. Diﬀ. and Int. Equations 2007, 20(3): 277-292

2007
[39]

Smulevici, J., Small data solutions of the Vlasov-Pois son system and the vector ﬁeld method. Ann. PDE 2016 2(2)

2016
[40]

Methods Appl

Yang, D., Growth estimates and uniform decay for the Vla sov-Poisson system, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2017, 40: 4906-4916. Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401. Email address : gmattingly@mines.edu Email address : pankavi...

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [31]

Pankavich, S., Asymptotic Dynamics of Dispersive, Col lisionless Plasmas. Comm. Math. Phys. 2022 391: 455-493

work page 2022

[2] [14]

et al., Scattering M ap for the Vlasov-Poisson System, Peking Math J

Flynn, P., Ouyang, Z., Pausader, B. et al., Scattering M ap for the Vlasov-Poisson System, Peking Math J. 2023 6: 365-392

work page 2023

[3] [38]

and Taylor, M., Inverse modiﬁed scattering a nd polyhomogeneous expansions for the Vlasov–Poisson syst em

Schlue, V. and Taylor, M., Inverse modiﬁed scattering a nd polyhomogeneous expansions for the Vlasov–Poisson syst em. arXiv:2404.15885 2024

arXiv 2024

[4] [1]

and Stegun, I., Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables

Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I., Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Dover (9th Ed) 1964

work page 1964

[5] [2]

and Degond, P., Global existence for the Vlaso v-Poisson equation in 3 space variables with small initial d ata

Bardos, C. and Degond, P., Global existence for the Vlaso v-Poisson equation in 3 space variables with small initial d ata. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire1985, 2(2): 101-118

work page

[6] [3]

Advances in Diﬀerential Equations 1998, 3: 271-292

Batt, J., Kunze, M., and Rein, G., On the asymptotic behav ior of a one-dimensional, monocharged plasma and a rescalin g method. Advances in Diﬀerential Equations 1998, 3: 271-292

work page 1998

[7] [4]

Communications on Pure and Applied Mathemat ics 2017, 71(3): 537-576

Bedrossian, J., Masmoudi, N., and Mouhot, C., Landau Dam ping in Finite Regularity for Unconﬁned Systems with Screen ed Interactions. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathemat ics 2017, 71(3): 537-576

work page 2017

[8] [5]

Ben-Artzi, J., Calogero, S., and Pankavich, S., Arbitra rily large solutions of the Vlasov-Poisson system. SIAM J. M ath. Anal. 2018, 50(4): 4311-4326

work page 2018