Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Transverse asymptotic stability of line solitary waves for the Ionic Euler-Poisson system

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Small-amplitude line solitary waves of the three-dimensional ionic Euler-Poisson system are transversely asymptotically stable: under small localized irrotational perturbations a global smooth solution exists and relaxes in L∞ to a…

desk verdict A significant new stability theorem for a quasilinear plasma model, but several load-bearing estimates are only sketched—worth a careful referee, not a desk reject. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23572 v1 pith:5COXTQEV submitted 2025-07-31 math.AP

Frédéric Rousset (LMO) , Changzhen Sun (LMB) This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3135C0835B3535B4035Q5376X05
keywords Euler-PoissonsystemsolitarywavestransversestabilityasymptoticquasilinearhyperbolicKP-IIapproximationmodulationtheoryweightedSobolevspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to prove that the one-dimensional solitary waves of the three-dimensional ionic Euler-Poisson system — a plasma model of ions coupled to a Boltzmann-distributed electron background — survive small disturbances that vary in the transverse directions. The main theorem states that any sufficiently small, localized, irrotational perturbation of a small-amplitude line solitary wave produces a unique global smooth solution that converges in L∞ back to the same family of waves, with the wave's speed and position adjusted by modulation functions that decay at heat-equation rates. What makes this nontrivial is that the system is quasilinear-hyperbolic: unlike the semilinear model equations studied before (KP-II, Benney-Luke), it is not well-posed in the energy space and can form cusp singularities in other regimes, so the proof must rule out blow-up while extracting dispersive decay everywhere in space.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the linearized operator $L_c(\eta)$ acting on exponentially weighted spaces $L^2_a \times \dot H^1_a$ with weight $a = \epsilon/4$ in the direction of propagation, together with its family of continuous resonant modes: eigenvalues $\lambda_c(\eta) = i\lambda_{1,c}\eta - \lambda_{2,c}\eta^2 + O(\eta^2)$ bifurcating from the translational eigenvalue at $\eta = 0$. On the spectral complement the semigroup decays like $e^{-\beta\epsilon^3 t}$ (Theorem 1.3), proved through uniform resolvent estimates split into three transverse-frequency regimes: pseudodifferential diagonalization at high transverse frequencies, specially designed energy functionals at intermediate frequencies, and a KP-II approximation at low frequencies. The nonlinear proof rides on this linear decay through three coordinated steps: modulation equations for $(\tilde c, \gamma)$ forming a dissipative-wave system with heat-type decay; a divergence-free corrector $w = -\operatorname{curl}(-\Delta)^{-1}\operatorname{curl}(\cdot)$ that repairs the nonlocalized part of the velocity potential so that source terms achieve the critical decay $(1+t)^{-1}$ in $L^2$; and a normal-form (space-time resonance) transformation that upgrades quadratic nonlinearities to cubic ones, controlled by two-tier estimates combining weighted decay with a barely growing $\dot H^{-1/2}$ norm.

What would settle it

Compute the spectrum of the linearized operator $L_c(\eta)$ in the exponentially weighted space: Theorem 1.3 requires a spectral gap of order $\epsilon^3$, namely that every point with $\mathrm{Re}\,\lambda > -\beta\epsilon^3$ lies in the resolvent set with a uniform bound (1.13). A detected eigenvalue or spectral cluster whose real part grows like $\epsilon^2$ rather than $\epsilon^3$, or a resolvent norm blowing up on that half-plane, would falsify the linear estimate on which the entire bootstrap rests. Equally decisive would be a numerical run with data meeting $M(0) \le \delta$ but with only algebraic decay to the left: finite-time blow-up of the high-order norm there would indicate the exponential-localization hypothesis is not merely technical.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that transverse spreading stabilizes the line solitary wave at the nonlinear level. Concretely, Theorem 1.2 asserts that for initial data within δ of a small-amplitude solitary wave of speed $c_0 = V + \epsilon^2$, measured in a norm combining localization, Sobolev regularity up to order 12, and exponential decay with weight $e^{\epsilon x/4}$, there is a unique global smooth solution together with modulation functions $(c,\gamma)(t,y)$ such that the radiation decays with rate $(1+t)^{-1-\iota}$ in $L^\infty$, while the position shift $\gamma$ decays like $(1+t)^{-1/2}$ and the speed change $c-c_0$ like $(1+t)^{-1}$ — the same rates as a heat equation in the transverse variables. The asymptotic object is not a fixed wave but the one-parameter family $Q_c$, with $c$ and $\gamma$ locked to the decaying perturbation through orthogonality conditions, so the result is nonlinear asymptotic stability, not merely orbital stability.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbation must decay exponentially as $x \to -\infty$, enforced by the weight $e^{ax}$ with $a = \epsilon/4$; if the disturbance is only polynomially localized on the left, the proof's weighted-space and semigroup machinery breaks down, a limitation the authors flag explicitly when leaving that case for future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the small-amplitude regime $\epsilon \ll 1$, every sufficiently small localized irrotational disturbance of a line solitary wave leads to a global smooth solution: the cusp singularities known to form in one-dimensional Euler-Poisson when gradients are large do not appear here.
  • The long-time behavior is fully described: the wave survives with a speed change and position shift that decay like $(1+t)^{-1}$ and $(1+t)^{-1/2}$, while the remaining radiation decays pointwise at rate $(1+t)^{-1-\iota}$.
  • Transverse dispersion is stabilizing: because the decay rates match the heat equation in the transverse variables, the line soliton is nonlinearly asymptotically stable rather than only orbitally stable, resolving for this system the question the paper poses about quasilinear analogues of the KP-II stability theorem.
  • The proof strategy — weighted-space semigroup decay combined with high-frequency damping and modulation analysis — is put forward as a template for transverse nonlinear stability in other quasilinear systems, with the gravity water-wave problem named as the natural next target.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the linear semigroup decay rate $\epsilon^3$ matches the KdV/KP-II long-wave scaling, the stabilization mechanism is plausibly universal for weakly long, quasilinear dispersive systems whose transverse linearization has a degenerate zero eigenvalue pair; the three-frequency resolvent analysis here is a candidate template for such systems.
  • The exponential weight in only the negative-$x$ direction suggests that the physically natural algebraic-localization assumption could be recovered by a mechanism other than the virial estimates the authors cite — for instance, carrying the modulation parameters in a hierarchy of weaker weights at the price of slower decay exponents.
  • A concrete testable extension is whether the $(1+t)^{-1/2}$ decay of the position modulation $\gamma$ is sharp: if the heat-type modulation semigroup is indeed the limiting dynamics, any numerically observed slower decay would signal a nonlinear saturation effect not captured by the a-priori estimates.
  • The paper stops at exponential localization on the left, but its resolvent machinery already shows where the difficulty lives (high-order virial estimates); an extension to polynomial localization would likely change the decay rates but not the asymptotic object, namely the modulated solitary wave.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves the transverse nonlinear asymptotic stability of small-amplitude one-dimensional line solitary waves for the three-dimensional ionic Euler-Poisson system. Theorem 1.2 asserts that for small, localized, irrotational perturbations with exponential decay in the negative x-direction, there exists a unique global smooth solution that converges, in L∞ at the rate (1+t)^{-(1+ι)}, to a modulated solitary wave Q_{c(t,y)}(x-c0t-γ(t,y)), with the modulation parameters satisfying (1+t)^{1/2}‖γ‖_{L∞} + (1+t)‖c-c0‖_{L∞} ≲ δ. The linear engine is Theorem 1.3, an exponential semigroup decay e^{-βϵ³t} on the spectral complement of the continuous resonant modes, obtained in Section 8 via a frequency-region resolvent analysis. The nonlinear proof (Sections 3–7) combines a dissipative-wave modulation system, weighted-space decay from the semigroup plus high-frequency damping, a corrector for the non-localized velocity potential, energy estimates with logarithmic growth, and a two-tier normal-form/dispersive argument for the radiation component, with the estimates organized into Propositions 3.7, 4.1, 5.3, 6.1 and supporting lemmas.

Significance. If the estimates hold as stated, this is a substantial result: it appears to be the first nonlinear transverse asymptotic stability theorem, including global smoothness, for solitary waves of a quasilinear three-dimensional dispersive system with a singularity-formation risk, going well beyond the semilinear KP-II setting of Mizumachi. The paper is transparent about its main hypothesis: the exponential localization to the left (a = ϵ/4) is stated explicitly in Section 1.2, and the relaxation to algebraic decay is honestly deferred to future virial-type estimates. Strengths include the modular, precisely stated propositions; the derivation of the spectral coefficients λ1,c, λ2,c and the KP-II coefficient C(V) by Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction rather than by fitting; and the consistency of the index chain (M = 12, 8κ = 8/(1−κ), ι = κ/24) with the various M ≥ ℓκ + ... requirements in Section 6. The reservations are concentrated at two load-bearing points where details are left to the reader: the modulation-parameter decay estimates (Remark 3.9) and the low-frequency KP-II approximation of the resolvent (Lemma 8.8).

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, proof of Proposition 3.7 and Remark 3.9] The decay of the modulation parameters is the backbone of the source-term control in Sections 4–6, but the central estimates (3.52)–(3.55) are asserted in Remark 3.9 with 'following similar arguments as in the proof of the above estimate', and in the proof of Proposition 3.7 the bound ‖∂ζ Ij(t)‖_{L∞_ζ} ≲ (1+t)^{-1}(N(T)² + N(T)⁴) is dismissed with 'We omit the details'. These bounds are used directly in Proposition 4.1 (estimates of R, yR, ∂yR), in Corollary 5.2, and in Lemma 6.3, e.g. in (6.12)–(6.17). Since no other part of the paper supplies these ∂ζ and y-weighted time-derivative estimates, they are load-bearing for the bootstrap. The authors should provide the proofs, or at least display the specific cancellations (in particular the use of (3.21) to exchange ∂t for Δyγ and the role of the extension of g*k to |η| ∈ [η0, 2η0]) that justify the claimed rates.
  2. [§8.3.2, Lemma 8.8] Lemma 8.8 is the hinge of the low-transverse-frequency resolvent argument: the estimate (8.53), the uniform bound (8.41) of Proposition 8.6, Theorem 8.1, and hence the semigroup decay (1.12) used in Section 4 all depend on the remainder estimate (8.56). The derivation is compressed: after the expansions (8.59)–(8.61), the key step is the sentence 'it is direct to check that the sum of the first three terms inside of the bracket of (8.62) has the form (∂x−â)(2u1ϵ + V nϵ) + O_{B(L²)}(K⁵ϵ²)', and the error term R2 in (8.61), which combines functional-calculus errors of σϵ(D), √(−µ²ϵ)(D), and the elliptic resolvent difference I_{â,ϵ²ϕϵ} − I_â, is not displayed. One missing factor of K or one lost power of ϵ would destroy the K^{−3}ϵ³ remainder bound, which is exactly what is needed to close (8.53) against Proposition 8.9. The full expansion should be written out rather than left as 'direct to check'.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§8.3.2, display after (8.59)] The display 'We thus proved that λ0_{-,ϵ}(D)χKP(D) = ϵ³Λ̂a_KP,0(D) + R1' uses the subscript −, whereas the preceding computation concerns λ0_{+,ϵ} and Lemma 8.8 also concerns λ0_{+,ϵ}; this appears to be a typographical error.
  2. [Theorem 1.2, Section 1.2] The quantifier order 'There exists ϵ0 > 0, δ0 > 0 such that for every 0 < ϵ ≤ ϵ0, 0 < δ ≤ δ0' suggests that δ0 is uniform in ϵ, but the proof only yields δ0 = δ0(ϵ): the damping margin in Proposition 4.1 requires δ ≲ ϵ (e.g., aκ0/4 − C(ϵ² + δ) > 0), and constants such as (aα0)^{-1} ≲ ϵ^{-4} in (4.3) or ϵ^{-3} in (8.41) enter the final smallness. The statement (and the constants in the '≲ δ' estimates) should clarify this ε-dependence, e.g., by stating 'for every ϵ ∈ (0, ϵ0] there exists δ0(ϵ) > 0'.
  3. [§5, Proposition 5.1 and Corollary 5.2] Several estimates are dispatched with 'we omit the details' (e.g., the remaining terms in (5.6) and in (5.8)). These are auxiliary rather than load-bearing, but a brief appendix or a display of the interpolation arguments would make the paper self-contained and would relieve the referee of re-deriving the bounds for the terms involving (w2, w3) and the Δy c interactions.
  4. [§1.4.1, first bullet point] In the sentence 'the rate of decay of the semigroup that we obtain in (1.3) is roughly e^{−ϵ³t}', the reference should be to (1.12), not (1.3).
  5. [§6, notation for 8κ, 8κ,1, ℓκ, mκ] The cluster of constants 8κ = 8/(1−κ), 8κ,1 = 8/(1−10κ/9), ℓκ = 1 + 3/(8κ,1), and mκ = ℓκ + 3(3+κ)/4 is used repeatedly, and the various requirements of the form M ≥ ℓκ + a + O(κ) appear at different points of Section 6. A short table collecting these constants, their roles, and where each regularity requirement is used would substantially improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the stability proof is self-contained given external existence, dispersive, and KP-II results; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not obtained by fitting or by definitional identification. The solitary wave family is taken from the external existence theorem [4], the dispersive estimates come from [25,27], and the low-frequency KP-II resolvent invertibility is imported from Mizumachi's external Proposition 3.2 [41]. The spectral coefficients lambda_1,c and lambda_2,c are derived in Appendix A rather than assumed. The low-transverse-frequency approximation in Lemma 8.8 is justified by explicit expansions (8.59)-(8.62) and detailed in Appendix C, not smuggled in as an ansatz; any concern about the completeness of the algebraic verification is a rigor issue, not circularity. The only self-citations, notably to the authors' water-wave work in Section 1.4.2 and Section 8.1, are used as motivation or as pointers to standard pseudodifferential and spectral techniques whose substantive external support is also cited (Theorem 4.29 [60], Theorem III.6.7 [31]). The exponential-weight hypothesis is an explicit assumption and its relaxation is acknowledged as an open limitation, not a hidden circular input. Overall, the derivation chain is externally supported and does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters fitted to data. The analysis uses the wave amplitude ϵ and the weight a=ϵ/4 as smallness parameters, but these are not tuned to match a target output. The main external inputs are the existence/profile expansion of solitary waves from [4], standard dispersive estimates from [25,27], and standard tools (Lax-Milgram, Gearhart-Prüss, pseudo-differential calculus).

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Existence and expansion of small-amplitude line solitary waves (Theorem 1.1, quoted from [4]): n_c=ϵ²Θ_ϵ(ϵx), ψ_c=ϵΨ_ϵ(ϵx), with KdV profile at leading order.
    The nonlinear stability claim is about perturbations of these waves; the paper does not re-derive their existence.
  • domain assumption P is smooth and strictly increasing; c0 > sqrt(h'(1)+1).
    Used to define h, to ensure solitary wave existence, and in Lemma 5.4 to recover ∂z(n, v1) from the equations.
  • standard math Dispersive estimates for e^{itP(D)} (Lemma F.2) quoted from [25,27].
    The decay of (ϱ,v) in L^{8κ} relies on these estimates; the paper verifies the conditions on P(r).
  • standard math The normal-form bilinear estimates in Lemma F.3, partly from [25] and partly new.
    The low-frequency estimates (F.6)-(F.8) are stated and only sketched; they are load-bearing for the two-tier normal form in Section 6.2.
  • standard math Standard tools: Lax-Milgram for (e^{φc} - Δ)^{-1}, Gearhart-Prüss theorem, pseudo-differential calculus, Littlewood-Paley theory.
    These are invoked throughout Sections 4, 8 and the appendices as standard background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transverse asymptotic stability of line solitary waves for the Ionic Euler-Poisson system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5COXTQEV

@misc{pith2026250723572,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transverse asymptotic stability of line solitary waves for the Ionic Euler-Poisson system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5COXTQEV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23572}
}
read the original abstract

We prove the linear and nonlinear asymptotic stability of small amplitude one-dimensional solitary waves submitted to small localized irrotational perturbations in the three dimensional Euler-Poisson system describing the dynamics of ions. In particular, in this regime, we obtain the existence of global smooth solutions and describe their asymptotic behavior.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. C. Alexander, R. L. Pego, and R. L. Sachs. On the transverse instability of solitary waves in the Kadomtsev- Petviashvili equation.Phys. Lett. A, 226(3-4):187–192, 1997

    work page 1997

  2. [2]

    J. Bae, J. Choi, and B. Kwon. Formation of singularities in plasma ion dynamics.Nonlinearity, 37(4):Paper No. 045011, 29, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    J. Bae, Y. Kim, and B. Kwon. Structure of singularities for the euler-poisson system of ion dynamics, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Bae and B

    J. Bae and B. Kwon. Small amplitude limit of solitary waves for the Euler-Poisson system.J. Differential Equations, 266(6):3450–3478, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Bae and B

    J. Bae and B. Kwon. Linear stability of solitary waves for the isothermal Euler-Poisson system.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 243(1):257–327, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Bahouri, J.-Y

    H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin.Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, volume 343 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Chen and J

    G. Chen and J. Lührmann. Asymptotic stability of the sine-gordon kink.https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07004, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Asymptotic Stability of Solitary Waves for One Dimensional Nonlinear Schr\"odinger Equations

    C. Collot and P. Germain. Asymptotic stability of solitary waves for one dimensional nonlinear schrödinger equations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03668, 2023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Cordier, P

    S. Cordier, P. Degond, P. Markowich, and C. Schmeiser. Travelling wave analysis of an isothermal Euler-Poisson model. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6), 5(4):599–643, 1996

    1996

  2. [10]

    Cuccagna

    S. Cuccagna. On asymptotic stability in 3D of kinks for theϕ4 model. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 360(5):2581–2614, 2008

    2008

  3. [11]

    Dafermos, G

    M. Dafermos, G. Holzegel, I. Rodnianski, and M. Taylor. The non-linear stability of the schwarzschild family of black holes. arXiv:2104.08222

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Dell’Oro and D

    F. Dell’Oro and D. Seifert. A short elementary proof of the Gearhart-Prüss theorem for bounded semigroups. In Control and inverse problems, Trends Math., pages 241–246. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Delort and N

    J.-M. Delort and N. Masmoudi.Long-time dispersive estimates for perturbations of a kink solution of one-dimensional cubic wave equations, volume 1 ofMemoirs of the European Mathematical Society. EMS Press, Berlin, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Y. Deng, A. D. Ionescu, B. Pausader, and F. Pusateri. Global solutions of the gravity-capillary water-wave system in three dimensions.Acta Math., 219(2):213–402, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    Faye and L

    G. Faye and L. M. Rodrigues. Exponential asymptotic stability of Riemann shocks of hyperbolic systems of balance laws. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 55(6):6425–6456, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Gearhart

    L. Gearhart. Spectral theory for contraction semigroups on Hilbert space.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 236:385–394, 1978

    1978

  9. [17]

    P. Germain. Space-time resonances. Journées équations aux dérivées partielles, pages 1–10. Groupement de recherche 2434 du CNRS, 2010

    2010

  10. [18]

    Germain, N

    P. Germain, N. Masmoudi, and J. Shatah. Global solutions for the gravity water waves equation in dimension 3.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 347(15-16):897–902, 2009

    2009

  11. [19]

    Germain and F

    P. Germain and F. Pusateri. Quadratic Klein-Gordon equations with a potential in one dimension.Forum Math. Pi, 10:Paper No. e17, 172, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Germain, F

    P. Germain, F. Pusateri, and F. Rousset. Asymptotic stability of solitons for mKdV.Adv. Math., 299:272–330, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    Grafakos.Classical Fourier analysis, volume 249 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

    L. Grafakos.Classical Fourier analysis, volume 249 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, second edition, 2008

    2008

  14. [22]

    Grenier, Y

    E. Grenier, Y. Guo, B. Pausader, and M. Suzuki. Derivation of the ion equation.Quart. Appl. Math., 78(2):305–332, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Y. Guo. Smooth irrotational flows in the large to the Euler-Poisson system inR3+1.Comm. Math. Phys., 195(2):249–265, 1998

    1998

  16. [24]

    Y. Guo, L. Han, and J. Zhang. Absence of shocks for one dimensional Euler-Poisson system.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 223(3):1057–1121, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    Guo and B

    Y. Guo and B. Pausader. Global smooth ion dynamics in the Euler-Poisson system.Comm. Math. Phys., 303(1):89–125, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Guo and X

    Y. Guo and X. Pu. KdV limit of the Euler-Poisson system.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 211(2):673–710, 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Z. Guo, L. Peng, and B. Wang. Decay estimates for a class of wave equations.J. Funct. Anal., 254(6):1642–1660, 2008. 82

    2008

  20. [28]

    Gustafson, K

    S. Gustafson, K. Nakanishi, and T.-P. Tsai. Scattering for the Gross-Pitaevskii equation.Math. Res. Lett., 13(2-3):273– 285, 2006

    2006

  21. [29]

    Haragus and A

    M. Haragus and A. Scheel. Linear stability and instability of ion-acoustic plasma solitary waves.Phys. D, 170(1):13–30, 2002

    2002

  22. [30]

    A. D. Ionescu and B. Pausader. The Euler-Poisson system in 2D: global stability of the constant equilibrium solution. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (4):761–826, 2013

    2013

  23. [31]

    Kato.Perturbation theory for linear operators, volume Band 132 ofDie Grundlehren der mathematischen Wis- senschaften

    T. Kato.Perturbation theory for linear operators, volume Band 132 ofDie Grundlehren der mathematischen Wis- senschaften. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, 1966

    1966

  24. [32]

    Klainerman and J

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel.Global nonlinear stability of Schwarzschild spacetime under polarized perturbations, volume 210 ofAnnals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    Klainerman and J

    S. Klainerman and J. Szeftel. Kerr stability for small angular momentum.Pure Appl. Math. Q., 19(3):791–1678, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Li and Y

    D. Li and Y. Wu. The Cauchy problem for the two dimensional Euler-Poisson system.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 16(10):2211–2266, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Lührmann and W

    J. Lührmann and W. Schlag. Asymptotic stability of the sine-Gordon kink under odd perturbations.Duke Math. J., 172(14):2715–2820, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Lührmann and W

    J. Lührmann and W. Schlag. On codimension one stability of the soliton for the 1D focusing cubic Klein-Gordon equation. Commun. Am. Math. Soc., 4:230–356, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Lührmann, S.-J

    J. Lührmann, S.-J. Oh, and S. Shahshahani. Stability of the catenoid for the hyperbolic vanishing mean curvature equation outside symmetry.Invent. math. 240, 903–1044, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    Martel and F

    Y. Martel and F. Merle. Asymptotic stability of solitons of the gKdV equations with general nonlinearity.Math. Ann., 341(2):391–427, 2008

    2008

  31. [39]

    Mascia and K

    C. Mascia and K. Zumbrun. Stability of large-amplitude shock profiles of general relaxation systems.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 37(3):889–913, 2005

    2005

  32. [40]

    Mizumachi

    T. Mizumachi. Asymptotic stability of lattice solitons in the energy space.Comm. Math. Phys., 288(1):125–144, 2009

    2009

  33. [41]

    Mizumachi

    T. Mizumachi. Stability of line solitons for the KP-II equation inR2. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 238(1125):vii+95, 2015

    2015

  34. [42]

    Mizumachi and Y

    T. Mizumachi and Y. Shimabukuro. Asymptotic linear stability of Benney-Luke line solitary waves in 2D.Nonlinearity, 30(9):3419–3465, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Mizumachi and Y

    T. Mizumachi and Y. Shimabukuro. Stability of Benney-Luke line solitary waves in 2 dimensions.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 52(5):4238–4283, 2020

    2020

  36. [44]

    Mizumachi and N

    T. Mizumachi and N. Tzvetkov.L2-stability of solitary waves for the KdV equation via Pego and Weinstein’s method. In Harmonic analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, volume B49 ofRIMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu, pages 33–63. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. (RIMS), Kyoto, 2014

    2014

  37. [45]

    Noble, L

    P. Noble, L. M. Rodrigues, and C. Sun. Spectral instability of small-amplitude periodic waves of the electronic Euler-Poisson system.Nonlinearity, 36(9):4615–4640, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    R. L. Pego and S.-M. Sun. Asymptotic linear stability of solitary water waves.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 222(3):1161– 1216, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    R. L. Pego and M. I. Weinstein. Asymptotic stability of solitary waves.Comm. Math. Phys., 164(2):305–349, 1994

    1994

  40. [48]

    R. L. Pego and M. I. Weinstein. Convective linear stability of solitary waves for Boussinesq equations.Stud. Appl. Math., 99(4):311–375, 1997

    1997

  41. [49]

    J. Prüss. On the spectrum ofC0-semigroups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 284(2):847–857, 1984

    1984

  42. [50]

    L. M. Rodrigues and K. Zumbrun. Periodic-coefficient damping estimates, and stability of large-amplitude roll waves in inclined thin film flow.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 48(1):268–280, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Rousset and C

    F. Rousset and C. Sun. Transverse Linear Stability of One-Dimensional Solitary Gravity Water Waves.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 249(3):Paper No. 36, 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    Rousset and N

    F. Rousset and N. Tzvetkov. Transverse nonlinear instability of solitary waves for some Hamiltonian PDE’s.J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 90(6):550–590, 2008

    2008

  45. [53]

    Rousset and N

    F. Rousset and N. Tzvetkov. Transverse nonlinear instability for two-dimensional dispersive models.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire, 26(2):477–496, 2009

    2009

  46. [54]

    Rousset and N

    F. Rousset and N. Tzvetkov. A simple criterion of transverse linear instability for solitary waves.Math. Res. Lett., 17(1):157–169, 2010

    2010

  47. [55]

    Rousset and N

    F. Rousset and N. Tzvetkov. Transverse instability of the line solitary water-waves.Invent. Math., 184(2):257–388, 2011

    2011

  48. [56]

    Rousset and N

    F. Rousset and N. Tzvetkov. Stability and instability of the KdV solitary wave under the KP-I flow.Comm. Math. Phys., 313(1):155–173, 2012

    2012

  49. [57]

    R. Sagdeev. Cooperative phenomena and shock waves in collisionless plasmas.Reviews of plasma physics, 4:23, 1966

    1966

  50. [58]

    Zakharov

    V. Zakharov. Instability and nonlinear oscillations of solitons.JEPT Lett, 22:177–173, 1975

    1975

  51. [59]

    Zakharov and A

    V. Zakharov and A. Rubenchik. Instability of waveguides and solitons in nonlinear media.Sov. Phys. JETP, 38:494–500, 1974

    1974

  52. [60]

    Zworski.Semiclassical analysis, volume 138 ofGraduate Studies in Mathematics

    M. Zworski.Semiclassical analysis, volume 138 ofGraduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012. 83 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire de Mathématiques d’Orsay (UMR 8628), 91405 Orsay Cedex, France Email address: frederic.rousset@un...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.