Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Hearing carrier-envelope offset frequency and phase in air with a microphone

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The acoustic wave from few-cycle pulses in air carries sidebands at twice the carrier-envelope offset frequency, so a microphone can measure f_ceo.

desk verdict New and probably real result: acoustic waves from few-cycle pulses in air track CEP, but the printed theoretical model for the f_ceo sidebands has a math error, and the f_ceo demo uses only artificially slow modulation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08304 v3 pith:5DJGRQNP submitted 2024-11-13 physics.optics physics.atom-ph

Meng Han , Ming-Chang Chen , Ming-Shian Tsai , Hao Liang This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.atom-ph
keywords carrier-envelopephaseoffsetfrequencylaser-inducedacousticwavesoptoacousticsstrong-fieldionizationfew-cyclepulsesTIPTOEairplasma
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that laser-induced acoustic waves from carrier-envelope-phase-stabilized sub-4-femtosecond pulses focused in air carry information about the electric-field waveform. The sound amplitude changes with the carrier-envelope phase because a cosine-like pulse ionizes more air than a sine-like pulse, so the acoustic blast tracks the ionization yield. Since the carrier-envelope offset frequency is the rate at which this phase slips, the acoustic comb acquires sidebands at $\pm 2 f_{\mathrm{ceo}}$, which the authors read with a microphone. This suggests a simple, air-based alternative to f-to-2f interferometry for strong-field and attosecond laboratories, and a way to characterize few-cycle pulse waveforms by 'hearing' them.

What carries the argument

The central object is the acoustic frequency comb produced by the periodic blast waves from the focused pulse train, each pulse heating the air through strong-field ionization. The modulation equation $P_N(\phi,t)=P_0(t)[1+\sigma\cos(2\phi)] * \sum_n \delta(t-nT_{\mathrm{rep}})$ converts a slow CEP slip into amplitude sidebands at $\pm 2 f_{\mathrm{ceo}}$, because $\phi=2\pi f_{\mathrm{ceo}} t$ and the response is $2\phi$-periodic. The stepwise $\pi$ phase shift in the differential acoustic waveform shows that CEP changes amplitude rather than phase, which is why the main comb teeth stay put while the sidebands carry the offset frequency.

What would settle it

Keep the CEP locked ($f_{\mathrm{ceo}}=0$) while deliberately modulating the pulse energy at a frequency $f$ and look for acoustic sidebands at $\pm f$; if they appear, the acoustic signal is not isolating $f_{\mathrm{ceo}}$. A cleaner check is to compare acoustic CEP contrast and 391-nm fluorescence CEP contrast while the beam is spatially filtered and the pulse energy is servo-locked; a mismatch would reveal a non-ionization contribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the CEP dependence of the acoustic wave is primarily an amplitude modulation set by the total ionization probability, with a $\pi$-periodicity that follows from the two field peaks per optical cycle. Equation (1) models the acoustic waveform as $P_N(\phi,t)=P_0(t)[1+\sigma\cos(2\phi)] * \sum_n \delta(t-nT_{\mathrm{rep}})$, so the Fourier spectrum contains sidebands at $\pm 2 f_{\mathrm{ceo}}$. The paper observes these sidebands moving with modulated $f_{\mathrm{ceo}}$ values near 1.5 Hz and 2.5 Hz, and confirms the ionization link by matching the acoustic CEP dependence to the 391-nm N$_2^+$ fluorescence and by benchmarking acoustic TIPTOE traces against fluorescence TIPTOE.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation that the acoustic sidebands report $f_{\mathrm{ceo}}$ assumes the sound amplitude is proportional to the total ionization probability, so that CEP changes the sound only through the ionized electron density; any CEP-correlated variation in pulse energy, focal quality, or microphone pickup would contaminate the measurement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The acoustic spectrum's sidebands at $\pm 2 f_{\mathrm{ceo}}$ give an air-based, microphone-only readout of the carrier-envelope offset frequency.
  • The close match between acoustic and 391-nm fluorescence TIPTOE traces makes sound a viable observable for few-cycle pulse characterization.
  • The $\pi$-periodic CEP dependence aligns the acoustic signal with total ionization yield, allowing simultaneous acoustic and fluorescence diagnostics of strong-field ionization.
  • Because the acoustic comb's teeth are phase locked and its time jitter is below 400 ps, the same measurement can track pulse-to-pulse stability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ionization-proportionality holds, choosing gases with lower ionization potential or operating at higher pressure could amplify the 0.2% acoustic contrast and push the method toward higher-repetition-rate sources.
  • The $\pi$-periodic response leaves an absolute CEP sign ambiguity; adding a weak second harmonic, as the paper notes, should break the symmetry and generate odd $f_{\mathrm{ceo}}$ sidebands, which could be tested directly.
  • A microphone array around the filament could turn the acoustic signal into a spatially resolved map of the ionization volume, extending the method from a single-point phase measurement to a diagnostic of focal-region dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first observation of carrier-envelope phase (CEP)-dependent acoustic waves generated by CEP-stabilized sub-4-fs laser pulses focused in air. The authors show that the acoustic signal amplitude depends on the CEP with a pi-periodicity and a contrast of about 0.2%, and that this modulation correlates with the fluorescence signal from N2+ ions, suggesting that the effect is mediated by ionization. They demonstrate that a sinusoidal modulation of the CEP at 1.5 or 2.5 Hz produces acoustic sidebands at twice those frequencies, and they present a TIPTOE measurement using the acoustic signal that agrees with a 391-nm fluorescence TIPTOE trace. The central claims are that carrier-envelope offset frequencies can be 'heard' with a microphone and that the acoustic signal can be used for optical waveform characterization.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold, this work presents a novel and technically simple optoacoustic detection scheme for CEP and slow CEP drift, with potential utility in strong-field laboratories lacking f-to-2f interferometers. The paper has notable strengths: simultaneous acoustic and fluorescence acquisition with cross-calibration, an energy-scaling trend consistent with ADK tunneling ionization, a TIPTOE trace that matches the fluorescence reference, and observation with a low-cost microphone. The principal limitations are the small (0.2%) contrast, the proof-of-principle character of the f_ceo demonstration (externally imposed CEP modulation rather than an unknown offset frequency), and a mathematical modeling error in Eqs. (1)-(2) that must be corrected. With that correction and additional control measurements to exclude CEP-correlated artifacts, the work would be a valuable contribution to attosecond metrology and photoacoustics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (1)] The printed model does not yield the claimed ±2 f_ceo sidebands. Because the CEP-dependent factor 1+σ cos(4π f_ceo t) is inside the convolution with Σ_n δ(t−nT_rep), the n-th replica is P_0(t−nT_rep)[1+σ cos(4π f_ceo (t−nT_rep))]. For f_ceo ≪ 1/T_rep this factor is essentially constant over the duration of each acoustic pulse and is identical for every pulse index n, so the train is not amplitude-modulated from pulse to pulse and its spectrum contains no sidebands at ±2 f_ceo. The observed sidebands require the CEP-dependent amplitude to multiply the train after convolution, e.g., P_N(t)=Σ_n P_0(t−nT_rep)[1+σ cos(4π f_ceo n T_rep)]. This error is load-bearing because Eqs. (1) and (2) are the only derivation of the sideband positions; the experimental data in Figure 4 are consistent with the corrected model, but the printed equations must be revised and the derivation redone.
  2. [Section 2, Fig. 2(d)] The interpretation that the acoustic intensity monitors CEP only through the total ionization probability relies on the unsupported assertion that 'Both signals should be proportional to the total ionization probability.' The correlation with the 391-nm N2+ fluorescence is supportive but does not exclude the possibility that a fraction of the ≈0.2% acoustic modulation originates from CEP-correlated variations in pulse energy, focal geometry, or microphone pickup. The authors should provide a control measurement, such as simultaneous pulse-energy monitoring or a CEP-randomization scan with fixed energy, to quantitatively bound these contributions; without it, the claim that the acoustic sidebands uniquely measure f_ceo is not fully established.
  3. [Section 2, Fig. 4] The f_ceo measurement is demonstrated by externally modulating the CEP at 1.5 Hz and 2.5 Hz and detecting sidebands at twice those frequencies, not by measuring an unknown carrier-envelope offset frequency of a free-running comb. This is a valid proof-of-principle, but the manuscript should state this distinction explicitly and discuss the conditions under which an actual unknown f_ceo could be determined from the acoustic spectrum, including averaging time, the low-frequency cutoff of the microphone, and the applicability to high-repetition-rate systems. As written, the title and abstract overstate the generality of the f_ceo measurement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The LaTeX artifacts 'textbfb', 'textbfc', and 'textbfd' should be removed.
  2. [Section 2, near Fig. 2] The word 'donate' should be 'denote' in the sentence about vibrational quantum numbers.
  3. [Section 2, near Fig. 2(d)] The phrase 'against with the signal' should be 'in contrast to the signal'.
  4. [Section 2, Eq. (1)] In the sentence explaining the convolution, 'the sign of *' should be 'the symbol *'.
  5. [Section 2, Fig. 4 caption] The relation between the stated modulation frequencies (3 Hz and 5 Hz) and the quoted f_ceo values (1.5 Hz and 2.5 Hz) should be explained in the main text, as the factor of two is not self-evident.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The sideband 'derivation' is an ansatz that already contains the answer; the measured effect is independently validated, so circularity is partial.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 2, Eq. (1) and Eq. (2)]
    "P_N(φ_CEP,t)= P_0(t)[1+σ cos(2φ_CEP)]∗Σ_n δ(t−nT_rep)= P_0(t)[1+σ cos(2×2π×f_ceo t)]∗Σ_n δ(t−nT_rep) ... Therefore, the sidebands appears at ±2 f_ceo."

    The sideband frequencies are not derived but baked into the ansatz: Eq. (1) already contains a cosine at 2×2π×f_ceo, and Eq. (2) is just the Fourier transform of that term. The conclusion is the input modulation written in another domain. In addition, as printed the cosine is convolved with the repetition comb, so the train is periodic with T_rep for a fixed f_ceo and the comb-sampled spectrum contains no continuous ±2f_ceo sidebands; the observed sidebands require an unstated pulse-index-dependent amplitude modulation. Thus the printed derivation is both definitionally loaded and internally inconsistent.

full rationale

The central experimental result is not circular: sidebands are observed while the CEP is deliberately modulated at known rates (1.5 and 2.5 Hz), so the frequency positions are checked against an external clock, not fitted. The correlation of acoustic intensity with 391-nm N2+ fluorescence is an independent cross-check for the ionization mechanism. The self-citations (ref. 25 for the laser system; refs. 25/31/35/36 for TIPTOE) are contextual and not load-bearing for the f_ceo derivation. However, Eqs. (1)-(2) present the sideband prediction as a deduction when it is really the same cos(2φ_CEP) assumption restated; the printed convolution also fails to produce the claimed sidebands. This is a partial, presentational circularity in the theoretical chain, not a falsification of the measured effect.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central model, Eq. (1), includes one fitted parameter sigma (the CEP contrast) and assumes a cos(2 phi) amplitude dependence; the sideband frequencies then follow from Fourier analysis. The ionization-proportionality assumption is supported only by correlation with 391-nm fluorescence, not by a direct measurement of electron density.

free parameters (1)
  • sigma (CEP contrast) = ~0.002 (0.2% amplitude contrast, ~0.1% differential waveform energy). Measured from Fig. 2(d) and Fig. 3(c).
    Introduced in Eq. (1) as the contrast of the cosine CEP modulation. Its value is taken from the measured CEP-dependent acoustic contrast rather than derived from first principles.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The acoustic wave originates from gas pressure fluctuation due to heat relaxation after strong-field ionization.
    Invoked in Sec. 2 to connect the acoustic signal to plasma heating; based on ref. 17.
  • domain assumption Acoustic intensity and fluorescence are proportional to total ionization probability.
    Stated in Sec. 2 ('Both signals should be proportional to the total ionization probability') and used to interpret the CEP dependence.
  • ad hoc to paper The CEP dependence of acoustic amplitude has a cos(2 phi_CEP) functional form with period pi.
    Eq. (1) assumes this form; it is supported by the observed pi-periodic contrast and the emergence of sidebands at 2 f_ceo, but the cosine shape is not derived.
  • domain assumption Two electric field peaks within one optical cycle make the ionization yield pi-periodic in CEP.
    Used in Sec. 2 to explain pi periodicity; analogized to high-harmonic yield and said to be confirmed by forthcoming VMI measurements.
  • standard math Fourier transform and convolution theorems apply to the sampled acoustic pulses.
    Used to derive Eq. (2) from Eq. (1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hearing carrier-envelope offset frequency and phase in air with a microphone." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5DJGRQNP

@misc{pith2026241108304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hearing carrier-envelope offset frequency and phase in air with a microphone},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5DJGRQNP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08304}
}
read the original abstract

Attosecond science and frequency metrology rely on the precise measurement and control of the laser pulse waveform, a feat traditionally achieved using optoelectronic techniques. In this study, we conducted a laser-induced acoustic experiment in air ionized by carrier-envelope phase (CEP)-stabilized sub-4 femtosecond pulses. Our results reveal that the acoustic signal exhibits CEP dependence in few-cycle pulses, primarily through amplitude modulation from laser-driven ionization. This novel optoacoustic phenomenon enables not only the measurement of the carrier-envelope offset frequency but also the direct characterization of the waveform of optical pulses through a microphone. Our study highlights the potential of laser-induced acoustic waves for advancing frequency metrology and ultrafast science.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08304 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Laser-induced acoustic wave generation (a) Experimental setup. The acoustic waves and side-emission fluorescence are measured simultaneously as a function of CEP. 𝑇rep denotes the repetition period of the optical pulses. textbfb Measured acoustic waveform in the time domain from a state-of-the-art microphone. textbfc) Spectral intensity of the acoustic waves, obtained by applying the Fourier transform to the wavefor… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. CEP-dependent fluorescence and acoustic wave generation in air. (a) CEP-averaged fluorescence spectrum. (b) CEP-resolved differential distribution of the fluorescence spectrum. (c) Acoustic wave spectra as a function of laser CEP. Each CEP-dependent spectral component is normalized to its maximum value. (d) Comparison of CEP dependence of the total acoustic intensity and the fluorescences from ionized and excited ni… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. CEP dependence of acoustic waveform in the time domain. CEP-resolved (a) and -averaged (b) acoustic waveforms. The colorbar in (a) represents the voltage. (c) CEP-resolved differential distribution by subtracting the CEP-averaged waveform. Two dashed curves have been added to highlight the stepwise 𝜋 phase shift. (d) Lineouts from (c) at the relative CEP = 0 and 0.5𝜋. Relative CE P (radians) -2 0 2 1.5 Hz 0 1 2 3 4 … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hearing the carrier-envelope offset frequency. (a) Stabilized and (b, c) modulated CEP as a function of time, with modulation frequencies set to 3 Hz and 5 Hz, respectively. Note that the modulation range is from 𝜋/2 to −𝜋/2, and therefore the corresponding 𝑓ceo is 1.5…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pulse characterization based on laser acoustic waves. (a, b) TIPTOE traces based on the 2nd acoustic spectral component and the 391-nm fluorescence, respectively. (c) Comparison of residual signals from (a) and (b), which are obtained by subtracting their dc background…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Attosecond metrology,

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, “Attosecond metrology,” Nature414, 509–513 (2001). -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Time delay (fs) 4001 4001.2 4001.4 4001.6 4001.8 4002 4002.2Sound frequency (Hz) 2 4 6 8 10 10-4 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30385 387 389 391 393 395 397 W...

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    Thegeneration,characterizationandapplicationsofbroadbandisolatedattosecond pulses,

    M.Chini,K.Zhao,andZ.Chang,“Thegeneration,characterizationandapplicationsofbroadbandisolatedattosecond pulses,” Nat. Photonics8, 178–186 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Carrier-envelope phase control of femtosecond mode-locked lasers and direct optical frequency synthesis,

    D. J. Jones, S. A. Diddams, J. K. Ranka, A. Stentz, R. S. Windeler, J. L. Hall, and S. T. Cundiff, “Carrier-envelope phase control of femtosecond mode-locked lasers and direct optical frequency synthesis,” Science288, 635–639 (2000)

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Controlling the phase evolution of few-cycle light pulses,

    A.Apolonski,A.Poppe,G.Tempea,C.Spielmann,T.Udem,R.Holzwarth,T.W.Hänsch,andF.Krausz,“Controlling the phase evolution of few-cycle light pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 740 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Single-shot measurement of carrier-envelope phase changes by spectral interferometry,

    M. Kakehata, H. Takada, Y. Kobayashi, K. Torizuka, Y. Fujihira, T. Homma, and H. Takahashi, “Single-shot measurement of carrier-envelope phase changes by spectral interferometry,” Opt. letters26, 1436–1438 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Phase-controlled amplification of few-cycle laser pulses,

    A. Baltuska, M. Uiberacker, E. Goulielmakis, R. Kienberger, V. S. Yakovlev, T. Udem, T. W. Hansch, and F. Krausz, “Phase-controlled amplification of few-cycle laser pulses,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.9, 972–989 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Monolithic carrier-envelope phase-stabilization scheme,

    T. Fuji, J. Rauschenberger, A. Apolonski, V. S. Yakovlev, G. Tempea, T. Udem, C. Gohle, T. W. Hänsch, W. Lehnert, M. Schereret al., “Monolithic carrier-envelope phase-stabilization scheme,” Opt. letters30, 332–334 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Monolithic ceo-stabilization scheme-based frequency comb from an octave-spanning laser,

    Z.-J. Yu, H.-N. Han, Y. Xie, H. Teng, Z.-H. Wang, and Z.-Y. Wei, “Monolithic ceo-stabilization scheme-based frequency comb from an octave-spanning laser,” Chin. Phys. B25, 044205 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Absolute-phase phenomena in photoionization with few-cycle laser pulses,

    G. Paulus, F. Grasbon, H. Walther, P. Villoresi, M. Nisoli, S. Stagira, E. Priori, and S. De Silvestri, “Absolute-phase phenomena in photoionization with few-cycle laser pulses,” Nature414, 182–184 (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    Optical-field-controlledphotoemission from plasmonic nanoparticles,

    W.P.Putnam,R.G.Hobbs,P.D.Keathley,K.K.Berggren,andF.X.Kärtner,“Optical-field-controlledphotoemission from plasmonic nanoparticles,” nature physics13, 335–339 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Vanishing carrier-envelope- phase-sensitive response in optical-field photoemission from plasmonic nanoantennas,

    P. Keathley, W. Putnam, P. Vasireddy, R. Hobbs, Y. Yang, K. Berggren, and F. Kärtner, “Vanishing carrier-envelope- phase-sensitive response in optical-field photoemission from plasmonic nanoantennas,” Nat. physics15, 1128–1133 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Single-shot carrier–envelope-phase measurement in ambient air,

    M. Kubullek, Z. Wang, K. von der Brelje, D. Zimin, P. Rosenberger, J. Schötz, M. Neuhaus, S. Sederberg, A. Staudte, N. Karpowiczet al., “Single-shot carrier–envelope-phase measurement in ambient air,” Optica7, 35–39 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Ye and S

    J. Ye and S. T. Cundiff,Femtosecond optical frequency comb: principle, operation and applications (Springer Science & Business Media, 2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    Experimental and theoretical studies of air breakdown by intense pulse of light,

    P. Nelson, P. Veyrie, M. Berry, and Y. Durand, “Experimental and theoretical studies of air breakdown by intense pulse of light,” Phys. Lett.13, 226–228 (1964)

    1964

  7. [15]

    Laser-sound reproduction by pulse amplitude modulation audio streams,

    K. Kaleris, P. Hatziantoniou, B. Stelzner, and D. Trimis, “Laser-sound reproduction by pulse amplitude modulation audio streams,” Sci. Reports14, 12102 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Laser-plasmasoundsourcesinatmosphericair: Asystematicexperimentalstudy,

    K. Kaleris, Y. Orphanos, S. Petrakis, M. Bakarezos, M. Tatarakis, J. Mourjopoulos, and N. A. Papadogiannis, “Laser-plasmasoundsourcesinatmosphericair: Asystematicexperimentalstudy,”J.SoundVib. 570,118000(2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Laser-sound: optoacoustic transduction from digital audio streams,

    K. Kaleris, B. Stelzner, P. Hatziantoniou, D. Trimis, and J. Mourjopoulos, “Laser-sound: optoacoustic transduction from digital audio streams,” Sci. reports11, 476 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Optoacoustic tones generated by nanosecond laser pulses can cover the entire human hearing range,

    L. Lengert, H. Lohmann, S. Johannsmeier, T. Ripken, H. Maier, A. Heisterkamp, and S. Kalies, “Optoacoustic tones generated by nanosecond laser pulses can cover the entire human hearing range,” J. Biophotonics15, e202200161 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    On the correlation of light and sound radiation following laser-induced breakdown in air,

    K. Kaleris, Y. Orphanos, M. Bakarezos, V. Dimitriou, M. Tatarakis, J. Mourjopoulos, and N. A. Papadogiannis, “On the correlation of light and sound radiation following laser-induced breakdown in air,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.53, 435207 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Experimental and analytical evaluation of the acoustic radiation of femtosecond laser plasma filament sound sources in air,

    K. Kaleris, Y. Orfanos, M. Bakarezos, N. Papadogiannis, and J. Mourjopoulos, “Experimental and analytical evaluation of the acoustic radiation of femtosecond laser plasma filament sound sources in air,” The J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146, EL212–EL218 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Effectofpulsedurationontheacoustic frequency emissions during the laser-induced breakdown of atmospheric air,

    E.Manikanta,L.VinothKumar,P.Venkateshwarlu,C.Leela,andP.P.Kiran,“Effectofpulsedurationontheacoustic frequency emissions during the laser-induced breakdown of atmospheric air,” Appl. optics55, 548–555 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Acoustic testing in a very small space based on a point sound source generated by laser-induced breakdown: Stabilization of plasma formation,

    N. Hosoya, M. Nagata, and I. Kajiwara, “Acoustic testing in a very small space based on a point sound source generated by laser-induced breakdown: Stabilization of plasma formation,” J. Sound Vib.332, 4572–4583 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Photoacoustic breakdown sound source in air,

    M. Oksanen and J. Hietanen, “Photoacoustic breakdown sound source in air,” Ultrasonics32, 327–331 (1994)

    1994

  16. [24]

    Carrier envelope phase stabilization of a yb: Kgw laser amplifier,

    T. Balči¯unas, O. D. Mücke, P. Mišeikis, G. Andriukaitis, A. Pugžlys, L. Gini¯unas, R. Danielius, R. Holzwarth, and A. Baltuška, “Carrier envelope phase stabilization of a yb: Kgw laser amplifier,” Opt. letters36, 3242–3244 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Nonlinear compression toward high-energy single-cycle pulses by cascaded focus and compression,

    M.-S. Tsai, A.-Y. Liang, C.-L. Tsai, P.-W. Lai, M.-W. Lin, and M.-C. Chen, “Nonlinear compression toward high-energy single-cycle pulses by cascaded focus and compression,” Sci. advances8, eabo1945 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    Themechanismofnitrogenfluorescenceinsideafemtosecond laser filament in air,

    H.Xu,A.Azarm,J.Bernhardt,Y.Kamali,andS.Chin,“Themechanismofnitrogenfluorescenceinsideafemtosecond laser filament in air,” Chem. Phys.360, 171–175 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Plasma luminescence from femtosecond filaments in air: evidence for impact excitation with circularly polarized light pulses,

    S. Mitryukovskiy, Y. Liu, P. Ding, A. Houard, A. Couairon, and A. Mysyrowicz, “Plasma luminescence from femtosecond filaments in air: evidence for impact excitation with circularly polarized light pulses,” Phys. review letters 114, 063003 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields,

    A. Baltuška, T. Udem, M. Uiberacker, M. Hentschel, E. Goulielmakis, C. Gohle, R. Holzwarth, V. S. Yakovlev, A. Scrinzi, T. W. Hänschet al., “Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields,” Nature421, 611–615 (2003)

    2003

  21. [29]

    Double optical gating of high-order harmonic generation<? format?> with carrier-envelope phase stabilized lasers,

    H. Mashiko, S. Gilbertson, C. Li, S. D. Khan, M. M. Shakya, E. Moon, and Z. Chang, “Double optical gating of high-order harmonic generation<? format?> with carrier-envelope phase stabilized lasers,” Phys. review letters100, 103906 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    Extreme ultraviolet supercontinua supporting pulse durations of less than one atomic unit of time,

    H. Mashiko, S. Gilbertson, M. Chini, X. Feng, C. Yun, H. Wang, S. D. Khan, S. Chen, and Z. Chang, “Extreme ultraviolet supercontinua supporting pulse durations of less than one atomic unit of time,” Opt. letters34, 3337–3339 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    Direct sampling of a light wave in air,

    S. B. Park, K. Kim, W. Cho, S. I. Hwang, I. Ivanov, C. H. Nam, and K. T. Kim, “Direct sampling of a light wave in air,” Optica5, 402–408 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Low-repetition-rate optical frequency comb,

    F. Canella, J. Weitenberg, M. Thariq, F. Schmid, P. Dwivedi, G. Galzerano, T. W. Hänsch, T. Udem, and A. Ozawa, “Low-repetition-rate optical frequency comb,” Optica11, 1–9 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    High-energy pulse synthesis with sub-cycle waveform control for strong-field physics,

    S.-W. Huang, G. Cirmi, J. Moses, K.-H. Hong, S. Bhardwaj, J. R. Birge, L.-J. Chen, E. Li, B. J. Eggleton, G. Cerullo et al., “High-energy pulse synthesis with sub-cycle waveform control for strong-field physics,” Nat. photonics5, 475–479 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an alternating electromagnetic field,

    M. V. Ammosov, N. B. Delone, and V. P. Krainov, “Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an alternating electromagnetic field,” Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys.64, 1191 (1986)

    1986

  27. [35]

    All-optical characterization of the two-dimensional waveform and the gouy phase of an infrared pulse based on plasma fluorescence of gas,

    N. Saito, N. Ishii, T. Kanai, and J. Itatani, “All-optical characterization of the two-dimensional waveform and the gouy phase of an infrared pulse based on plasma fluorescence of gas,” Opt. Express26, 24591–24601 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    All-opticalsampling of few-cycle infrared pulses using tunneling in a solid,

    Y.Liu,S.Gholam-Mirzaei,J.E.Beetar,J.Nesper,A.Yousif,M.Nrisimhamurty,andM.Chini,“All-opticalsampling of few-cycle infrared pulses using tunneling in a solid,” Photonics Res.9, 929–936 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.