pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17549 · v1 · pith:5EEEFFZSnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Dual-Polarization Quasi-BIC Refractive Index Sensing via Dielectric Symmetry Breaking in TiO₂-BeS Metasurfaces

Shoumik debnath , Sudipta Saha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords dielectric metasurfacequasi-BIC resonancerefractive index sensingdual polarizationsymmetry breakingTiO2 nanobarsnear-infrared sensormagnetic dipole
0
0 comments X

The pith

A TiO2 nanobar metasurface with a 20 nm BeS gap supports polarization-selective quasi-BIC and magnetic dipole resonances for refractive index sensing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a dielectric metasurface consisting of TiO2 nanobar pairs separated by a thin BeS layer. This insert breaks dielectric symmetry while keeping the geometry symmetric, which allows TE-polarized light to excite a high-Q quasi-BIC resonance and TM-polarized light to excite a separate magnetic dipole resonance. The two modes sit at different wavelengths, 879.2 nm and 910.8 nm, so both can be tracked at once in a single spectral window. When the background refractive index changes from 1.00 to 1.05, the resonances shift at different rates, giving sensitivities of 243.1 nm/RIU for the TE channel and 178.8 nm/RIU for the TM channel.

Core claim

Inserting a 20 nm BeS gap between TiO2 nanobars introduces dielectric symmetry breaking without geometric asymmetry. This enables a quasi-BIC resonance under TE illumination at 879.2 nm with Q=128 and a magnetic dipole resonance under TM illumination at 910.8 nm with Q=36. The modes exhibit refractive-index sensitivities of 243.1 nm/RIU and 178.8 nm/RIU respectively over background indices 1.00 to 1.05, with figures of merit of 35 and 7, and detection limits near 10^{-5} RIU. The TE mode shows strong field confinement inside the gap, increasing overlap with the surrounding analyte, while the spectral separation of the resonances produces a polarization-dependent fingerprint.

What carries the argument

The 20 nm BeS gap insert that creates dielectric symmetry breaking, permitting polarization-selective excitation of a quasi-BIC resonance and a magnetic dipole resonance within the same nanostructure.

If this is right

  • The spectral separation of the two resonances allows simultaneous tracking of both polarization channels inside one measurement window.
  • Different refractive-index responses from the TE and TM modes create a polarization-dependent spectral fingerprint that can add selectivity compared with single-channel sensors.
  • Strong field confinement of the TE mode inside the gap region improves overlap with the analyte and supports the reported sensitivity.
  • The structure maintains resonance behavior across independent FDTD solvers and shows tolerance to small dimensional variations.
  • Detection limits on the order of 10^{-5} RIU follow directly from the combination of sensitivity and resonance linewidths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-breaking principle could be applied to other high-index dielectric pairs to tune resonance wavelengths for different sensing bands.
  • Dual-polarization operation may increase measurement robustness when the incident light polarization is not perfectly controlled.
  • Integration of the metasurface with microfluidic channels would allow real-time monitoring of both channels for liquid analytes.
  • Experimental fabrication and optical characterization would be the direct next step to confirm the simulated Q factors and sensitivities.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical FDTD simulations accurately capture the electromagnetic behavior and material properties of the TiO2-BeS structure in a real fabricated device, including the precise effect of the 20 nm BeS gap on dielectric symmetry without unmodeled losses or fabrication imperfections.

What would settle it

Fabricate the TiO2-BeS nanobar metasurface and measure the resonance wavelengths and their shifts under controlled TE and TM illumination while varying the background refractive index from 1.00 to 1.05, then compare the observed sensitivities against the simulated values of 243.1 nm/RIU and 178.8 nm/RIU.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17549 by Shoumik Debnath, Sudipta Saha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Device architecture. (a) Three-dimensional view of the unit cell. Two TiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mesh convergence test. The resonance wavelength at 10 nm mesh (light blue) and 5 nm mesh (dark blue) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Optical constants of pristine BeS from DFT calculations [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Transmission spectra at nbg = 1.0 for the bare TiO2 bar pair (dashed gray) and the BeS-loaded structure (solid blue) under 0◦ (TE) illumination. The BeS insert red-shifts the resonance by 2.3 nm and sharpens the lineshape, confirming that the dielectric perturbation activates the quasi-BIC mode. 3.3 Transmission spectra and resonance physics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Transmission spectra at nbg = 1.0 for (a) 0◦ (TE) and (b) 90◦ (TM) polarizations, with RI-sweep stack for nbg = 1.00–1.05 (offset by 0.3 per step). Dashed curves are Fano fits at nbg = 1.0. The two resonances have distinct physical origins. The 0◦ resonance at 879.2 nm is a gap-coupled quasi-BIC mode. In a perfectly symmetric TiO2 bar pair, the antisymmetric superposition of the two bar dipole modes has op… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Fano lineshape fits (Eq. 1) to the FDTD transmission spectra at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normalized |Ex| 2 distributions at resonance in the cross-section through the unit cell. (a) At 879.2 nm (0◦ , TE): field concentrated at the inner base corners of the TiO2 bars near the substrate interface, characteristic of the gap-coupled electric dipole mode. (b) At 910.8 nm (90◦ , TM): broad dome near the bar top, consistent with the magnetic dipole mode storing energy inside the bar volume. 8 [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalized |Ez| 2 field distributions at resonance. (a) TE resonance at 879.2 nm showing strong field localization in the gap region near the BeS insert. (b) TM resonance at 910.8 nm exhibiting a four-lobe field pattern inside the TiO2 bars, consistent with magnetic dipole excitation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Resonance wavelength (nm, color scale) as a function of polarization and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Resonance wavelength λres versus nbg for 0◦ (blue) and 90◦ (red). Lines are linear fits with R2 > 0.999; shaded bands are 95% confidence intervals. Sensitivities: S (0◦ ) = 243.1 nm/RIU and S (90◦ ) = 178.8 nm/RIU [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Sensing performance shown as lollipop charts. (a) Sensitivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Polarization fingerprint. Resonance shifts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Structural parameter sweeps showing λres versus (a) gap width, (b) bar height, (c) unit-cell period, and (d) bar width. Filled circles indicate the deepest resonance dip; open squares correspond to the nominal mode near 900 nm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Relative resonance-shift map as a function of bar width and gap size. The nominal operating point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Bar-length asymmetry analysis. (a) Transmission map as a function of asymmetry parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Fabrication-tolerance heatmaps showing (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Radar chart comparing the normalized sensing metrics for the TE and TM polarization channels. All [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Cross-platform FDTD validation (Lumerical vs. Tidy3D). (a) Tidy3D transmission spectrum for the 90 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A dual-polarization dielectric metasurface sensor based on TiO$_2$ nanobar pairs with a 20\,nm BeS gap insert is numerically investigated in the near-infrared. The BeS layer introduces dielectric symmetry breaking without requiring geometric asymmetry, enabling polarization-selective excitation of two distinct resonances. Under TE illumination, the structure supports a quasi-BIC resonance at 879.2\,nm with $Q=128$, whereas TM excitation produces a broader magnetic dipole resonance at 910.8\,nm with $Q=36$. The spectral separation between the two modes enables simultaneous tracking of both polarization channels within a single measurement window. For background refractive indices from 1.00 to 1.05, the TE and TM resonances exhibit sensitivities of 243.1 and 178.8\,nm/RIU, respectively. The corresponding figures of merit reach 35 and 7\,RIU$^{-1}$, with detection limits on the order of $10^{-5}$\,RIU. Field distributions show strong confinement of the TE mode inside the gap region, leading to enhanced overlap with the surrounding analyte. Because the two resonances respond differently to refractive-index variations, the metasurface produces a polarization-dependent spectral fingerprint that may provide additional selectivity beyond conventional single-channel dielectric sensors. The proposed platform further shows good tolerance against dimensional variation and consistent resonance behavior across independent FDTD solvers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically investigates a TiO₂-BeS metasurface for dual-polarization refractive index sensing. A 20 nm BeS gap insert breaks dielectric symmetry to enable polarization-selective resonances: a quasi-BIC mode at 879.2 nm (Q=128) under TE illumination and a magnetic dipole mode at 910.8 nm (Q=36) under TM illumination. For background indices 1.00–1.05, the modes show sensitivities of 243.1 nm/RIU and 178.8 nm/RIU with figures of merit 35 and 7 RIU⁻¹. The work reports strong field confinement in the gap for the TE mode, spectral separation allowing simultaneous tracking, and tolerance to dimensional variations with consistent results across independent FDTD solvers.

Significance. If the reported numerical results hold, the platform offers a compact route to polarization-dependent sensing with enhanced selectivity from differential responses of the two modes. The explicit demonstration of consistency across independent FDTD solvers and tolerance to fabrication variations strengthens the case for practical relevance in near-IR dielectric metasurface sensors.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical Methods / Simulation Setup] The central numerical claims rest on FDTD results, but the manuscript does not appear to include explicit mesh-convergence data or the precise material dispersion models and boundary conditions employed. These details are load-bearing for the quoted resonance wavelengths, Q-factors, and sensitivities (e.g., the 879.2 nm TE resonance and 243.1 nm/RIU sensitivity).
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Results] The detection limit of order 10^{-5} RIU is stated without an explicit noise model or formula; clarifying whether it derives directly from FOM or an assumed spectrometer resolution would aid reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and field-distribution plots would benefit from explicit labeling of the TE/TM polarization directions and the location of the 20 nm BeS gap to improve clarity for readers.
  3. [Discussion] A brief comparison table placing the achieved sensitivities and FOMs against recent dielectric metasurface RI sensors would strengthen the significance discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. The single major comment is addressed below; we will incorporate the requested details into the revised manuscript to improve reproducibility.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical Methods / Simulation Setup] The central numerical claims rest on FDTD results, but the manuscript does not appear to include explicit mesh-convergence data or the precise material dispersion models and boundary conditions employed. These details are load-bearing for the quoted resonance wavelengths, Q-factors, and sensitivities (e.g., the 879.2 nm TE resonance and 243.1 nm/RIU sensitivity).

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the numerical setup is essential for validating the reported resonance wavelengths, Q-factors, and sensitivities. Although the manuscript already notes consistency of results across two independent FDTD implementations, we did not include mesh-convergence tests or full specifications of the material models and boundary conditions. In the revised manuscript we will add these elements, including: (i) a mesh-convergence study confirming that the TE resonance at 879.2 nm and TM resonance at 910.8 nm remain stable to <0.2 nm for progressively refined meshes, (ii) the precise dispersion models employed for TiO₂ (Sellmeier coefficients) and BeS (tabulated or fitted complex index data with source references), and (iii) a complete description of the periodic boundary conditions, PML thickness, and source settings. These additions will be placed in a new Methods subsection or supplementary note. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in numerical FDTD results

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely numerical study that reports resonance wavelengths, Q-factors, sensitivities, and figures of merit obtained directly from FDTD simulations of the TiO2-BeS metasurface. These quantities are computed outputs under specified illumination and refractive-index conditions rather than quantities derived from equations that reduce by construction to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to justify the central claims; the text notes internal consistency across independent solvers and tolerance to dimensional variations. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained within the simulation framework and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of electromagnetic simulation for the chosen materials and geometry; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract, and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption FDTD numerical method accurately models the electromagnetic response of the TiO2-BeS metasurface including the effect of the thin BeS layer on symmetry breaking.
    All reported resonance wavelengths, Q factors, and sensitivities derive from these simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5790 in / 1430 out tokens · 40946 ms · 2026-05-19T22:32:36.535743+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species.Chem

    Jiˇrí Homola. Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species.Chem. Rev., 108(2):462–493, 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Dielectric metasurfaces for next-generation optical biosensing: a comparison with plasmonic sensing.Nanotechnology, 34(40):402001, 2022

    Shiwu Zhang, Rui Wang, Jingyi Li, Bingkun Ruan, Youwen Xu, Hui Ma, and Kai Wen. Dielectric metasurfaces for next-generation optical biosensing: a comparison with plasmonic sensing.Nanotechnology, 34(40):402001, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Neshev, Yuri S

    Andreas Tittl, Aleksandrs Leitis, Mingkai Liu, Filiz Yesilkoy, Duk-Yong Choi, Dragomir N. Neshev, Yuri S. Kivshar, and Hatice Altug. Imaging-based molecular barcoding with pixelated dielectric metasurfaces.Science, 360(6393):1105–1109, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Evlyukhin, Sergey M

    Andrey B. Evlyukhin, Sergey M. Novikov, Urs Zywietz, René Lynge Eriksen, Carsten Reinhardt, Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi, and Boris N. Chichkov. Demonstration of magnetic dipole resonances of dielectric nanospheres in the visible region.Nano Lett., 12(7):3749–3755, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Kuznetsov, Andrey E

    Arseniy I. Kuznetsov, Andrey E. Miroshnichenko, Mark L. Brongersma, Yuri S. Kivshar, and Boris Luk’yanchuk. Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures.Science, 354(6314):aag2472, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Neshev, Igal Brener, Thomas Pertsch, and Yuri S

    Manuel Decker, Isabelle Staude, Matthias Falkner, Jason Dominguez, Dragomir N. Neshev, Igal Brener, Thomas Pertsch, and Yuri S. Kivshar. High-efficiency dielectric Huygens’ surfaces.Adv. Opt. Mater ., 3(6):813–820, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Taylor, and Nanfang Yu

    Hou-Tong Chen, Antoinette J. Taylor, and Nanfang Yu. A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications.Rep. Prog. Phys., 79(7):076401, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Arvelo, Yasaman Jahani, Mingkai Liu, Andreas Tittl, V olkan Cevher, Yuri Kivshar, and Hatice Altug

    Filiz Yesilkoy, Eduardo R. Arvelo, Yasaman Jahani, Mingkai Liu, Andreas Tittl, V olkan Cevher, Yuri Kivshar, and Hatice Altug. Ultrasensitive hyperspectral imaging and biodetection enabled by dielectric metasurfaces.Nat. Photon., 13:390–396, 2019

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Dielectric resonant metaphotonics.ACS Photonics, 8(1):102–112, 2021

    Kirill Koshelev and Yuri Kivshar. Dielectric resonant metaphotonics.ACS Photonics, 8(1):102–112, 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Douglas Stone, John D

    Chia Wei Hsu, Bo Zhen, A. Douglas Stone, John D. Joannopoulos, and Marin Solja ˇci´c. Bound states in the continuum.Nat. Rev. Mater ., 1:16048, 2016. 17 Dual-Polarization Quasi-BIC Sensing via Dielectric Symmetry Breaking in TiO2-BeS Metasurfaces

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Qresonances governed by bound states in the continuum.Phys

    Kirill Koshelev, Sergei Lepeshov, Mingkai Liu, Andrey Bogdanov, and Yuri Kivshar. Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Qresonances governed by bound states in the continuum.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:193903, 2018

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    High-sensitivity sensing in all-dielectric metasurface driven by quasi-bound states in the continuum.Nanomaterials, 13(3):505, 2023

    Zhao Jing, Jiaxian Wang, Lizhen Gao, and Weibin Qiu. High-sensitivity sensing in all-dielectric metasurface driven by quasi-bound states in the continuum.Nanomaterials, 13(3):505, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Ultrasensitive metasurface sensor based on quasi-bound states in the continuum.Nanophotonics, 14(4):485–494, 2025

    Ning Li, He Chen, Yunxia Zhao, Yongtian Wang, Zhaoxian Su, Yin Liu, and Lingling Huang. Ultrasensitive metasurface sensor based on quasi-bound states in the continuum.Nanophotonics, 14(4):485–494, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    High-sensitivity and Q-engineered all-dielectric metasurface sensor driven by bound states in the continuum.J

    Yang Zhou, Ming Luo, Xin Zhao, Qin Li, Jian Wen, Bing Tang, Xun Liu, and Ling Liang. High-sensitivity and Q-engineered all-dielectric metasurface sensor driven by bound states in the continuum.J. Opt., 2026

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    Dual high-Q Fano resonances metasurfaces excited by asymmetric dielectric rods for refractive index sensing

    Tianyu Wang, Siqi Liu, Jiahang Zhang, Liang Xu, Mingyu Yang, Ding Ma, Sijia Jiang, Qingbin Jiao, and Xin Tan. Dual high-Q Fano resonances metasurfaces excited by asymmetric dielectric rods for refractive index sensing. Nanophotonics, 13:1221–1232, 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    High-performance refractive index and temperature sensing based on toroidal dipole in all-dielectric metasurface.Sensors, 24(12):3943, 2024

    Junhao Zhao, Xin Fan, Wentao Fang, Wensheng Xiao, Fei Sun, Chenxi Li, Xin Wei, Jizhou Tao, Yan Wang, and Santosh Kumar. High-performance refractive index and temperature sensing based on toroidal dipole in all-dielectric metasurface.Sensors, 24(12):3943, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Permittivity-asymmetric qBIC metasurfaces for refractive index sensing.Nanophotonics, 14(27):5311–5321, 2025

    Xingye Yang, Alexander Antonov, Haiyang Hu, and Andreas Tittl. Permittivity-asymmetric qBIC metasurfaces for refractive index sensing.Nanophotonics, 14(27):5311–5321, 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Shobhita Kramadhati, Akhila Mallavarapu, and Cherie R. Kagan. State-of-polarization-based refractive index sensing using dielectric metasurfaces.Nano Lett., 25(46):16532–16537, 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Flatland metasurfaces for optical gas sensing.Sensors, 26(4):1293, 2026

    Muhammad Arif Butt. Flatland metasurfaces for optical gas sensing.Sensors, 26(4):1293, 2026

    work page 2026

  20. [20]

    R. Vijaya. Dielectric metasurfaces for refractive index sensing towards anemia detection.Frontiers in Photonics, 4:1234060, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission.Nature Nanotechnology, 10:937–943, 2015

    Amir Arbabi, Yu Horie, Mahmood Bagheri, and Andrei Faraon. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission.Nature Nanotechnology, 10:937–943, 2015

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Materials pushing the application limits of wire grid polarizers further into the deep ultraviolet spectral range.Adv

    Thomas Siefke, Stefanie Kroker, Kristian Pfeiffer, Oleksiy Puffky, Klaus Dietrich, Daniel Franta, Ivan Ohlidál, Adriana Szeghalmi, Ernst-Bernhard Kley, and Andreas Tünnermann. Materials pushing the application limits of wire grid polarizers further into the deep ultraviolet spectral range.Adv. Opt. Mater ., 4(11):1780–1786, 2016

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Garcia, Victoria Muñoz-Sanjosé, Gabriel López-Muñoz, Ulises Reyna-Tellez, José Lozano, María José Gimeno, and Ramón Serna

    Jorge A. Garcia, Victoria Muñoz-Sanjosé, Gabriel López-Muñoz, Ulises Reyna-Tellez, José Lozano, María José Gimeno, and Ramón Serna. Quasi-guided modes in titanium dioxide arrays fabricated via soft nanoimprint lithography.ACS Appl. Mater . Interfaces, 13(40):47860–47870, 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    H. B. Profijt, S. E. Potts, M. C. M. van de Sanden, and W. M. M. Kessels. Plasma-assisted atomic layer deposition: basics, opportunities, and challenges.J. V ac. Sci. Technol. A, 29(5):050801, 2011

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    High-Qrefractive index sensors based on all-dielectric metasurfaces.RSC Adv., 12(33):21264–21269, 2022

    Pinghui Wu, Shuangcao Qu, Xintao Zeng, Ning Su, Musheng Chen, and Yanzhong Yu. High-Qrefractive index sensors based on all-dielectric metasurfaces.RSC Adv., 12(33):21264–21269, 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Engineering multimodal dielectric resonance of TiO 2 based nanostructures for high- performance refractive index sensing applications.Opt

    Muhammad Aamir Abbas, Amna Zubair, Kashif Riaz, Wei Huang, Jinghua Teng, Muhammad Qasim Mehmood, and Muhammad Zubair. Engineering multimodal dielectric resonance of TiO 2 based nanostructures for high- performance refractive index sensing applications.Opt. Express, 28(16):23509–23522, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Ayirizia, Janee S

    Blaise A. Ayirizia, Janee S. Brumfield, Yuriy Malozovsky, and Diola Bagayoko. Ground state properties of the wide band gap semiconductor beryllium sulfide (BeS).Materials, 14(20):6128, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Akib Zaman, Rifat Shahriar, S. M. Takvir Hossain, Md Rajbanul Akhond, Homayra Tabassum Mumu, and Ahmed Sharif. A graphene-like BeS monolayer as a promising gas sensor material with strain and electric field induced tunable response: a first-principles study.RSC Adv., 13:23558–23569, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Ted Masselink

    Jan Kischkat, Sven Peters, Bernd Gruska, Mykhaylo Semtsiv, Marina Chashnikova, Michael Klinkmüller, Oleg Fedosenko, Sven Machulik, Galina Aleksandrova, Gennadiy Monastyrskyi, Yvonne Flores, and W. Ted Masselink. Mid-infrared optical properties of thin films of aluminum oxide, titanium dioxide, silicon dioxide, aluminum nitride, and silicon nitride.Appl. O...

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    Kawsar Alam

    Sudipta Saha and Md. Kawsar Alam. Exploring the interaction of BeS monolayer and lung disease biomarkers: Potential material for biosensing applications.Nano Select, 7(4):e70139, 2026

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Lumerical FDTD solutions.https://www.ansys.com/products/photonics/fdtd, 2024

    Ansys Inc. Lumerical FDTD solutions.https://www.ansys.com/products/photonics/fdtd, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves.J

    Jean-Pierre Bérenger. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves.J. Comput. Phys., 114(2):185–200, 1994. 18 Dual-Polarization Quasi-BIC Sensing via Dielectric Symmetry Breaking in TiO2-BeS Metasurfaces

    work page 1994

  33. [33]

    High-quality- factor multiple Fano resonances for refractive index sensing.Opt

    Yuebian Zhang, Wenwei Liu, Zhancheng Li, Zhi Li, Hua Cheng, Shuqi Chen, and Jianguo Tian. High-quality- factor multiple Fano resonances for refractive index sensing.Opt. Lett., 43(8):1842–1845, 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Hagness.Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method

    Allen Taflove and Susan C. Hagness.Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. Artech House, Norwood, MA, 3rd edition, 2005

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    Limonov, Mikhail V

    Mikhail F. Limonov, Mikhail V . Rybin, Alexander N. Poddubny, and Yuri S. Kivshar. Fano resonances in photonics. Nat. Photonics, 11:543–554, 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Miroshnichenko, Sergej Flach, and Yuri S

    Andrey E. Miroshnichenko, Sergej Flach, and Yuri S. Kivshar. Fano resonances in nanoscale structures.Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:2257–2298, 2010

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Joe, Arkady M

    Young S. Joe, Arkady M. Satanin, and Chang Sub Kim. Classical analogy of Fano resonances.Phys. Scr ., 74(2):259–266, 2006

    work page 2006

  38. [38]

    White and Xudong Fan

    Ian M. White and Xudong Fan. On the performance quantification of resonant refractive index sensors.Opt. Express, 16(2):1020–1028, 2008

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    Monica Soler and Laura M. Lechuga. Principles, technologies, and applications of plasmonic biosensors.J. Appl. Phys., 121(17):171101, 2017

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Anubhav Jain, Shyue Ping Ong, Geoffroy Hautier, Wei Chen, William Davidson Richards, Stephen Dacek, Shreyas Cholia, Dan Gunter, David Skinner, Gerbrand Ceder, and Kristin A. Persson. Materials data on BeS by the Materi- als Project. Materials Project Database, entry mp-422, July 2020. https://next-gen.materialsproject. org/materials/mp-422

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Electronic and optical properties of beryllium sulfide monolayer: Under stress and strain conditions.Physics Letters A, 380(42):3546–3552, 2016

    Jaafar Jalilian and Moslem Safari. Electronic and optical properties of beryllium sulfide monolayer: Under stress and strain conditions.Physics Letters A, 380(42):3546–3552, 2016

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Physical Review Letters, 77(18):3865–3868, 1996

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction

    Stefan Grimme. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 27(15):1787–1799, 2006

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    Evlyukhin, Carsten Reinhardt, Andreas Seidel, Boris S

    Andrey B. Evlyukhin, Carsten Reinhardt, Andreas Seidel, Boris S. Luk’yanchuk, and Boris N. Chichkov. Optical response features of Si-nanoparticle arrays.Phys. Rev. B, 82:045404, 2010

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    Miroshnichenko, Manuel Decker, Nche T

    Isabelle Staude, Andrey E. Miroshnichenko, Manuel Decker, Nche T. Fofang, Sheng Liu, Edward Gonzales, Jason Dominguez, Ting S. Luk, Dragomir N. Neshev, Igal Brener, and Yuri Kivshar. Tailoring directional scattering through magnetic and electric resonances in subwavelength silicon nanodisks.ACS Nano, 7(9):7824–7832, 2013

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Robinson, Long Chen, and Michal Lipson

    Jacob T. Robinson, Long Chen, and Michal Lipson. On-chip gas detection in silicon optical microcavities.Opt. Express, 16(6):4296–4301, 2008

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    Deotare, and Marko Loncar

    Qimin Quan, Parag B. Deotare, and Marko Loncar. Photonic crystal nanobeam cavity strongly coupled to the feeding waveguide.Appl. Phys. Lett., 96(20):203102, 2010

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Tidy3D: Cloud-native FDTD electromagnetic solver

    Flexcompute Inc. Tidy3D: Cloud-native FDTD electromagnetic solver. https://www.flexcompute.com/ tidy3d/, 2024

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    High-Q silicon resonator

    Flexcompute. High-Q silicon resonator. Tidy3D Example Library, https://www.flexcompute.com/tidy3d/ examples/notebooks/High_Q_Si_Resonator/, 2023

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Inverse design validation of Cs 3Cu2Cl5-based microring resonator

    Shoumik Debnath. Inverse design validation of Cs 3Cu2Cl5-based microring resonator. Tidy3D Community Library,https://www.flexcompute.com/tidy3d/community/notebooks/Cs3Cu2Cl5_MRR/, 2026

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Dual high-Q Fano resonances metasurface excited by asymmetric dielectric rods for refractive index sensing.Nanophotonics, 13(5):689–699, 2024

    Wenjie Chen, Ming Li, Wenhao Zhang, and Yuhang Chen. Dual high-Q Fano resonances metasurface excited by asymmetric dielectric rods for refractive index sensing.Nanophotonics, 13(5):689–699, 2024

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Hybrid metasurface based on Si3N4 nanopillar for optical sensing with dual channels.ACS Applied Nano Materials, 8(6):2965–2973, 2025

    Xingye Yang et al. Hybrid metasurface based on Si3N4 nanopillar for optical sensing with dual channels.ACS Applied Nano Materials, 8(6):2965–2973, 2025

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Barton, Jefferson Dixon, Joon-Hwan Song, Jorik van de Groep, Mark L

    Mark Lawrence, David R. Barton, Jefferson Dixon, Joon-Hwan Song, Jorik van de Groep, Mark L. Brongersma, and Jennifer A. Dionne. High quality factor phase gradient metasurfaces.Nat. Nanotechnol., 15:956–961, 2020

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Near-infrared spectroscopy for biomedical sensing and imaging: a review.J

    Dibyendu Bhatta and Indranil Bhattacharya. Near-infrared spectroscopy for biomedical sensing and imaging: a review.J. Near Infrared Spectrosc., 31(1):1–16, 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Lichtman and José-Angel Conchello

    Jeff W. Lichtman and José-Angel Conchello. Fluorescence microscopy.Nat. Methods, 2:910–919, 2005

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    Basilio, Larry K

    Salvatore Campione, Sheng Liu, Lorena I. Basilio, Larry K. Warne, William L. Langston, Ting S. Luk, Joel R. Wendt, John L. Reno, Gordon A. Keeler, Michael B. Sinclair, and Igal Brener. Broken symmetry dielectric resonators for high quality factor Fano metasurfaces.ACS Photonics, 3(12):2061–2068, 2016. 19

    work page 2061