Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 43 references

Quantum sensing of radiofrequency fields using cold Rydberg atoms in a super-molasses trap

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A coil-free cold-atom sensor reads microwave fields over a 43 dB range

desk verdict Credible and worth refereeing, but the unresolved Zeeman structure at low AT splittings means the self-calibrated low-field part of the 43 dB range is not yet demonstrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07260 v1 pith:5EVWJIRJ submitted 2026-08-07 physics.atom-ph

Romain Granier , Anthony El Bekai , Miguel Angel Cifuentes Marín , Cédric Blanchard , Nassim Zahzam , Yannick Bidel , Alexandre Bresson , Vilius Atkočius
show 7 more authors
Chester Camm Florence Concepcion Konstantinos Karakostas Matt Himsworth Alexander Jantzen Alexis Bonnin Sylvain Schwartz
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords Rydbergatomssuper-molassestraptrap-lossspectroscopyAutler-Townessplittingmicrowaveelectrometryquantumsensingcoldradio-frequencyfieldmeasurement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a radiofrequency field sensor built from cold rubidium Rydberg atoms held in a super-molasses trap, an all-optical trap that needs no magnetic coils and lets the sensor head be made entirely of dielectric materials. The key trick is to switch the cooling light off for 10 microseconds of every 200 and excite atoms from the ground state directly to a Rydberg state while watching loss of atoms from the trap. That narrows the spectral features from about 12 MHz to 1.5 MHz, roughly tenfold, and makes the measured Autler-Townes splitting a self-calibrated, SI-traceable readout of the microwave field amplitude. The paper reports a 43 dB dynamic range, better than 1% linearity over 32 dB, a resolution of 3 µV/cm after 300 seconds, and extraction of the field's ellipticity from the four spectral lines.

What carries the argument

The central object is the super-molasses trap: an all-optical near-resonance trap that loads about $10^{7}$ rubidium atoms at 300 µK directly from background vapor in a glass cell, with no magnetic field gradient and no metal near the atoms. The mechanism that carries the argument is trap-loss spectroscopy with the cooling light off, which removes lightshifts and ground-state Autler-Townes mixing and narrows the lines from 12 MHz to 1.5 MHz. The quantitative identity at the core is Eq. (1), which combines the four measured Autler-Townes frequencies into a single field amplitude regardless of polarization; it works because an elliptically polarized microwave field couples both circular components, each producing its own doublet, and the quadrature sum of the splittings is proportional to the total electric field through the dipole matrix element.

What would settle it

Feed a known 15.973 GHz field from a power-calibrated source into a second, identically constructed dielectric head and compare the amplitude returned by Eq. (1) with the independently measured value; any deviation beyond the claimed 1% linearity over the 32 dB range, or a shift of the fitted peak frequencies when the ambient magnetic field is varied by a fraction of a gauss, would falsify the self-calibrating assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a super-molasses trap, an all-optical trap producing about $10^{7}$ 87Rb atoms at roughly 300 µK in a glass-and-ceramic head, can serve as a practical microwave field sensor without any magnetic coils. By sending the two-photon Rydberg lasers only when the cooling light is off, the authors obtain trap-loss fluorescence dips with 1.5 MHz full width at half maximum. In the presence of a 15.973 GHz microwave field these dips become four Autler-Townes lines, and the field amplitude is recovered from their frequencies through the polarization-independent identity $\Delta\omega_{\mathrm{AT}} = \sqrt{\omega_3^2+\omega_4^2}/2 + \sqrt{\omega_2^2+\omega_1^2}/2 = dE/\hbar$, with $d$ the known dipole matrix element. The same data give the microwave detuning from the average line position, and the four-line pattern gives the ellipticity of the field. The authors report a 43 dB SI-traceable dynamic range and long-term stability that reaches 3 µV/cm resolution after 300 seconds of averaging.

Load-bearing premise

The whole demonstration assumes the super-molasses trap from the companion work performs as described, about $10^{7}$ rubidium atoms at 300 µK in a dielectric head that stays stable over five-hour runs, and that the ambient magnetic field of a fraction of a gauss only broadens the lines without shifting the fitted peak frequencies used in the calibration formula.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Microwave power can be calibrated traceably to SI with a compact, fully dielectric sensor head, because the conversion from measured splitting to field amplitude uses only atomic constants and the known dipole matrix element.
  • The combination of 1.5 MHz wide lines and splittings up to 223 MHz gives a 43 dB dynamic range, with an inferred upper bound near 49 dB set by coupling to the neighboring 61P3/2 state.
  • Long averaging reduces the frequency determination to about 6 kHz, corresponding to 3 µV/cm, and the measured power stays stable to about 1.5×10^-3 over thousands of seconds.
  • Because no inductive coils are present, the cooling and measurement phases can be alternated rapidly, which is what makes the narrow trap-loss lines possible and could be reused in other cold-atom sensors such as magnetometers, gravimeters, or clocks.
  • The four-line spectrum directly reveals the ellipticity of an applied microwave field, so amplitude and polarization information are available from a single scan.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 1.5 MHz linewidth is still about three times the estimated 520 kHz Doppler width for 300 µK atoms, so the low-field limit and hence the dynamic range could be extended if the residual broadening from cooling-laser noise, polarization fluctuations, and ambient magnetic field were removed.
  • The paper's own stability data show the short-term noise is set by roughly 10% fluorescence fluctuations from the cooling light; stabilizing the laser frequency and polarization would likely lower the 43 µV/cm/√Hz sensitivity directly.
  • The trap-loading-limited response time of about a fraction of a second is an artifact of the trap-loss readout, not of the Rydberg resonance; replacing fluorescence monitoring with probe-beam absorption, as the paper proposes, should allow much faster sampling at the same or better sensitivity.
  • Since the super-molasses trap is all-optical, several such traps could be formed in one vacuum chamber, which points toward arrayed or imaging RF sensing; this is a future possibility raised by the authors rather than a result demonstrated here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports radio-frequency (RF) field sensing using cold 87Rb Rydberg atoms in an all-optical, coil-free super-molasses trap (SMT). Trap-loss spectroscopy on the 5S1/2(F=2) to 61S1/2 two-photon transition is performed with the cooling light off, yielding spectral features as narrow as 1.5 MHz FWHM. In the presence of a 15.973 GHz microwave field coupling the 61S1/2 and 61P1/2 Rydberg states, the spectrum splits into four Autler-Townes lines, and Eq. (1) converts the measured frequencies to the microwave electric-field amplitude using the ARC dipole matrix element. The authors report a 43 dB SI-traceable dynamic range, scale-factor linearity better than 1% over 32 dB, a short-term sensitivity of 70 kHz/√Hz (43 µV/cm/√Hz), a 3 µV/cm resolution after 300 s, long-term stability over several hours, and retrieval of the microwave-field ellipticity from the four-line pattern.

Significance. If the low-field calibration issue is resolved, this is a significant advance: it combines narrow cold-atom trap-loss spectroscopy with a fully dielectric sensor head, removes magnetic coils from the atom source, and offers a polarization-independent Autler-Townes readout that is in principle SI-traceable via Eq. (1). The linearity data in Fig. 4 and the long-term stability measurements in Fig. 7 are valuable quantitative contributions. The explicit use of only one free parameter in the ellipticity model, and the fact that the central frequency-to-field conversion uses an external dipole matrix element rather than a fitted scale factor, are clear strengths of the manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, 'Trap-loss spectroscopy in the absence of cooling light' and 'RF measurements', Eq. (1)] The low-power end of the claimed self-calibrated dynamic range is not demonstrated. The manuscript attributes the 1.5 MHz FWHM of the trap-loss features to "Zeeman broadening by the ambient magnetic field on the order of a fraction of a Gauss." At the low microwave powers of Figs. 3 and 4, the Autler-Townes splitting approaches this linewidth, and the unresolved Zeeman sublevels of 5S1/2(F=2) and of the 61S1/2 and 61P1/2 states produce differential shifts on the order of 0.1–1 MHz for a fraction of a gauss. Equation (1) is derived from a field-free four-level Hamiltonian, and the paper neither reports a measurement of the ambient field nor includes Zeeman sublevels in the fit model; the asymmetric-Gaussian fits therefore do not guarantee that the fitted centroids are unbiased. Because the 70 kHz/√Hz noise floor, the 3 µV/cm resolution, and the low-field portion of the 43 dB range all rely on these centroids, the self-calibrated low-field claim is not supported. The authors should either resolve or explicitly model the Zeeman structure, measure the ambient B-field, or restrict the SI-traceable claim to splittings for which Zeeman shifts are negligible.
  2. [Abstract and Results, first paragraph] The claim of trap-loss signals "one order of magnitude narrower than for conventional magneto-optical traps" is not supported by an in-paper MOT measurement. The tenfold reduction shown in Fig. 2 compares the SMT with cooling light on (12 MHz) and off (1.5 MHz), not a conventional MOT. If the comparison is taken from refs. [19] or [28], the manuscript should quote those quantitative values and state the comparison explicitly; otherwise the abstract's comparative claim should be softened.
  3. [Results, first paragraph and Materials and Methods, 'Experimental design'] The sensor performance depends on SMT characteristics that are not independently characterized in this manuscript: the text cites ref. [25], an unpublished companion preprint with overlapping authors, for the ~10^7 atoms at 300 µK and for the long-term stability needed for the five-hour runs. Because these parameters are load-bearing for the claimed resolution, drift, and metal-free sensor-head operation, the paper should either include a concise in-situ characterization (atom number, temperature, trap lifetime, and long-term fluorescence or pointing stability) or explicitly list which parameters are inherited from ref. [25] together with their uncertainties. This matters for the transferability of the 43 dB range and the 3 µV/cm resolution to other SMT platforms.
  4. [RF measurements, Eq. (1) and uncertainty budget] For a self-calibrated SI-traceable measurement, the uncertainty in the dipole matrix element d appearing in Eq. (1) should be quantified. The paper gives |d| ≈ 1291.5 e a0 from ARC [34] but does not state its uncertainty, nor does it discuss how the unresolved Zeeman structure or the chosen quantization axis affects the effective d for the four measured peaks. The reported linearity (<1%) and stability figures are relative; an absolute calibration claim requires an uncertainty budget for d and for any angle-, polarization-, or Zeeman-dependent corrections.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The y-axis label and the definition of the plotted quantity are not given in the caption; the reader must infer from Eq. (2) that the plotted quantity is the average ̅ω of the four peak positions.
  2. [Eq. (1) and Fig. 3] Please specify the sign convention and the reference for ω_i: Eq. (1) uses the ω_i as fitted peak frequencies, while Fig. 3 is plotted against a two-photon detuning, and it should be stated explicitly that the ω_i are referenced to the zero-microwave peak position ω_0.
  3. [Materials and Methods, 'Experimental design'] "A 3: 3 fibered coupler" appears to be a typo; please correct to e.g. "a 1×3 fiber splitter."
  4. [Introduction, second paragraph] The statement that the direct two-photon linewidth is "ultimately limited by the lifetime of the Rydberg state, on the order of 1.5 kHz" is in tension with the later measured 1.5 MHz; please clarify that in the present experiment saturation and Zeeman broadening dominate, as discussed in the Results.
  5. [Fig. 7 and Statistical Analysis] The confidence intervals in Fig. 7 are computed with the AllanTools function using the Greenhall equivalent-degrees-of-freedom method; please state in the caption that these are estimated 1σ intervals from that framework, so that readers do not mistake them for ordinary standard deviations.
  6. [References [25]] Reference [25] is an unpublished preprint; if a peer-reviewed version becomes available, it should replace or supplement the preprint citation, and the present manuscript should identify which quantitative trap parameters are taken from it.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No central circularity: Eq. (1) is a parameter-free calibration using the external ARC dipole matrix element, but the Fig. 3 dashed curves are generated by fitting the ellipticity to the same data, so their agreement is by construction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results, RF measurements (Fig. 3 caption and main text); Materials and Methods, 'Estimation of the circularity of the MW field taking into account neighboring Rydberg states']
    "To quantitatively reproduce the experimental data shown on Fig. 3, it is necessary to take into account the energy shifts induced by the non-resonant coupling between 61S1/2, respectively 61P1/2, and their neighboring Rydberg states. ... Our best estimate of |χ| is then obtained by minimizing the distance between the measured frequencies and their theoretical values ∑ (ωexp,i − ωtheory,i)2 for i spanning the 4 eigenfrequencies and 12 different power values between −30 dBm and +3 dBm."

    The dashed model curves in Fig. 3 are produced after fitting the only free parameter, the MW ellipticity |χ|, to the very same measured peak frequencies that the curves are compared against. The visual agreement between the dashed curves and the data is therefore enforced by the fit rather than constituting an independent prediction. This is a genuine but secondary circular element: the central self-calibrated E-field measurement does not use |χ|; Eq. (1) converts measured Autler-Townes frequencies to E using only the ARC dipole matrix element, so the main result does not reduce to this fit.

full rationale

The paper's central derivational chain is not circular. Equation (1) maps the four measured Autler-Townes peak frequencies to the microwave electric-field amplitude using the dipole matrix element d taken from the external ARC calculation (ref. 34); no measured E-field value enters the calibration, so the 'self-calibrated' claim has independent content. The 43 dB dynamic range is likewise obtained from measured quantities: the largest observed Autler-Townes splitting (223 MHz) divided by the measured low-field linewidth (1.5 MHz). The super-molasses trap is cited to the companion preprint (ref. 25) with overlapping authors, which is a self-citation, but the present paper independently characterizes the cloud (about 10^7 atoms at 300 μK in a given volume) and presents the trap-loss spectra; the trap is apparatus, not a derived result. The only circular step is the ellipticity fit: the dashed curves in Fig. 3 are fitted to the same data they are displayed against, so their agreement is by construction. This does not affect the main E-field calibration or the dynamic-range claim, and therefore warrants only a low score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central E-field measurement uses no fitted physics parameters: Eq. (1) converts measured AT splittings to E using the ARC dipole matrix element. The main fitted quantity is the MW ellipticity used for the model curves in Fig. 3. The biggest external dependency is the super-molasses trap from the authors' companion preprint.

free parameters (1)
  • MW ellipticity |chi| = 0.735
    Only free parameter in the 4-level model used to reproduce the measured peak positions in Fig. 3; obtained by least-squares fit over 12 power values (-30 to +3 dBm), so the model agreement is not a parameter-free prediction.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The restriction of the Hamiltonian to the {|61S1/2, mJ=+/-(1/2)>, |61P1/2, mJ=+/-(1/2)>} manifold in the rotating wave approximation (Eq. 1) describes the observed four-line AT spectrum.
    Standard RWA/Autler-Townes theory; used in the RF measurements section and in Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption The super-molasses trap described in ref [25] produces about 10^7 87Rb atoms at 300 uK in a fully dielectric glass/ceramic head without magnetic coils.
    The paper does not characterize the SMT itself; it relies on a companion preprint by overlapping authors for the trap construction and performance.
  • domain assumption The ambient magnetic field (a fraction of a Gauss) broadens the spectral lines but does not systematically shift the extracted peak frequencies or break the 4-level line assignment.
    Used to explain the 1.5 MHz linewidth versus the 520 kHz Doppler prediction; no independent magnetometry is reported.
  • standard math Energy shifts from non-resonant coupling to neighboring Rydberg states (61P3/2, 60P1/2, 60P3/2, 62S1/2, 60D3/2, 59D3/2) are computed by second-order perturbation theory, and contributions below 100 kHz are neglected.
    Required for the theoretical curves in Fig. 3 and the ellipticity estimate; standard perturbation theory but depends on ARC matrix elements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum sensing of radiofrequency fields using cold Rydberg atoms in a super-molasses trap." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5EVWJIRJ

@misc{pith2026260807260,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum sensing of radiofrequency fields using cold Rydberg atoms in a super-molasses trap},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5EVWJIRJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07260}
}
abstract

We demonstrate the quantum sensing of radiofrequency fields based on cold Rydberg atoms in a super-molasses trap, without the need for magnetic coils. Our approach combines the metrological advantages of cold atoms with a metal-free dielectric sensor head minimizing perturbations to the electromagnetic environment, a feature that was previously restricted to vapor-cell-based devices. Moreover, the absence of inductive loads allows to rapidly alternate between the cooling phase and the Rydberg excitation, leading to trap-loss spectroscopy signals one order of magnitude narrower than for conventional magneto-optical traps. This enables self-calibrated microwave power measurements with an unprecedented dynamic range of 43dB, opening the door to new perspectives of applications in calibration measurements. We also report a scale factor linearity better than 1%, the absence of drifts over several tens of minutes leading to a 3$\mu$V/cm resolution, and the possibility to retrieve the ellipticity of the applied microwave field. By demonstrating a cold-atom metrological platform in a compact dielectric sensor head, this work paves the way for new applications in the field of radiofrequency measurements with Rydberg atoms, and in other fields of quantum sensing based on cold atoms such as magnetometry, gravimetry or inertial navigation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07260 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Trap-loss spectroscopy in the absence of cooling light for various levels of MW power. The indicated MW power (𝑃𝑀𝑊 = −39 to 3 dBm) was measured at the input of the MW horn. Measured fluorescence levels are plotted as a function of the two-photon detuning, 𝜔0 accounting for the trap-loss peak position without MW. The black dashed curves result from the theoretical estimation of the peaks position, taking into account… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Measurement of the MW frequency. The average position of the four trap￾loss spectroscopy peaks, following equation (2), is plotted as a function of the MW field detuning, showing a linear dependence with a -1/2 slope which can be used to recover the MW frequency from a single-shot measurement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Duverger, R., Bonnin, A., Granier, R., Marolleau, Q., Blanchard, C., Zahzam, N., Bidel, Y., Cadoret, M., Bresson, A., & Schwartz, S. (2024). Metrology of microwave fields based on trap- loss spectroscopy with cold Rydberg atoms. Physical Review Applied, 22(4), 044039. APS

    work page 2024

  2. [28]

    Baburaj Sheela, S., Kanti Barik, S., Shenoy, V., Chandak, S., Nath, R., & Roy, S. (2025). Observation of effects of inter-atomic interaction on Autler–Townes splitting in cold Rydberg atoms. New Journal of Physics, 27(8), 083202

    work page 2025

  3. [25]

    Himsworth, M., et al. (2026). Super-molasses returns: All optical near-resonance laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms from background vapor. arXiv:2607.04966 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  4. [34]

    Šibalić, J

    N. Šibalić, J. D. Pritchard, K. J. Weatherill, C. S. Adams, ARC: An open -source library for calculating properties of alkali Rydberg atoms, Computer Physics Communications 220, 319 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [1]

    Gallagher, T. F. (1988). Rydberg atoms. Reports on Progress in Physics, 51 (2), 143. IOP Publishing

    work page 1988

  6. [2]

    H., Castillo, Z

    Meyer, D. H., Castillo, Z. A., Cox, K. C., & Kunz, P. D. (2020). Assessment of Rydberg atoms for wideband electric field sensing. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53(3), 034001. IOP Publishing

    work page 2020

  7. [3]

    T., Scherer, D

    Fancher, C. T., Scherer, D. R., John, M. C. S., & Marlow, B. L. S. (2021). Rydberg atom electric field sensors for communications and sensing. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 2, 1-13

    work page 2021

  8. [4]

    & Jia, S

    Yuan, J., Yang, W., Jing, M., Zhang, H., Jiao, Y., Li, W., ... & Jia, S. (2023). Quantum sensing of microwave electric fields based on Rydberg atoms. Reports on Progress in Physics, 86(10), 106001

    work page 2023

Show all 43 references
  1. [5]

    P., Artusio-Glimpse, A

    Schlossberger, N., Prajapati, N., Berweger, S., Rotunno, A. P., Artusio-Glimpse, A. B., Simons, M. T., ... & Holloway, C. L. (2024). Rydberg states of alkali atoms in atomic vapour as SI - traceable field probes and communications receivers. Nature Reviews Physics, 6(10), 606-620

    2024

  2. [6]

    T., Gordon, J

    Simons, M. T., Gordon, J. A., & Holloway, C. L. (2018). Fiber-coupled vapor cell for a portable Rydberg atom-based radio frequency electric field sensor. Applied Optics, 57(22), 6456-6460

    2018

  3. [7]

    Mao, R., Lin, Y., Yang, K., An, Q., & Fu, Y. (2022). A high-efficiency fiber-coupled Rydberg- atom integrated probe and its imaging applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 22(2), 352-356

    2022

  4. [8]

    A., Sapiro, R

    Anderson, D. A., Sapiro, R. E., & Raithel, G. (2021). A self -calibrated SI-traceable Rydberg atom-based radio frequency electric field probe and measurement instrument. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 69(9), 5931–5941. IEEE

    2021

  5. [9]

    Q., Jin, S

    Gea-Banacloche, J., Li, Y. Q., Jin, S. Z., & Xiao, M. (1995). Electromagnetically induced transparency in ladder -type inhomogeneously broadened media: Theory and experiment. Physical Review A, 51(1), 576

    1995

  6. [10]

    B., Berweger, S., & Holloway, C

    Schlossberger, N., Prajapati, N., Artusio -Glimpse, A. B., Berweger, S., & Holloway, C. L. (2026). Fundamental linewidth limit of electromagnetically induced transparency in a thermal Rydberg ladder. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04596

    2026

  7. [11]

    P., & Kübler, H

    Shaffer, J. P., & Kübler, H. (2018, May). A read-out enhancement for microwave electric field sensing with Rydberg atoms. In Quantum Technologies 2018 (Vol. 10674, pp. 39-49). SPIE

    2018

  8. [12]

    M., Ripka, F., Venu, V., Christaller, F., Liu, C., Schmidt, M.,

    Bohaichuk, S. M., Ripka, F., Venu, V., Christaller, F., Liu, C., Schmidt, M., ... & Shaffer, J. P. (2023). Three -photon Rydberg -atom-based radio -frequency sensing scheme with narrow linewidth. Physical Review Applied, 20(6), L061004

    2023

  9. [13]

    M., Christaller, F., Schmidt, M., Kübler, H., & Shaffer, J

    Venu, V., Bohaichuk, S. M., Christaller, F., Schmidt, M., Kübler, H., & Shaffer, J. P. (2025, March). Three -photon Rydberg atom electrometry with enhanced sensitivity. In Quantum Sensing, Imaging, and Precision Metrology III (Vol. 13392, pp. 255-260). SPIE

    2025

  10. [14]

    -D., Yan, H., & Zhu, S

    Liao, K.-Y., Tu, H.-T., Yang, S.-Z., Chen, C.-J., Liu, X.-H., Liang, J., Zhang, X. -D., Yan, H., & Zhu, S. -L. (2020). Microwave electrometry via electromagnetically induced absorption in cold Rydberg atoms. Physical Review A, 101(5), 053432. APS

    2020

  11. [15]

    Zhou, F., Jia, F., Liu, X., Yu, Y., Mei, J., Zhang, J., Xie, F., & Zhong, Z. (2023). Improving the spectral resolution and measurement range of quantum microwave electrometry by cold Rydberg atoms. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 56 (2), 025501. IO...

    2023

  12. [16]

    P., Eckel, S

    Schlossberger, N., Rotunno, A. P., Eckel, S. P., Norrgard, E. B., Manchaiah, D., Prajapati, N., Artusio-Glimpse, A. B., Berweger, S., Simons, M. T., Shylla, D., & others. (2025). Primary quantum thermometry of mm-wave blackbody radiation via induced state transfer in Rydberg s...

    2025

  13. [17]

    J., Adams, C

    Jamieson, M. J., Adams, C. S., Weatherill, K. J., Hanley, R. K., Alves, N., & Keaveney, J. (2025). Continuous -time ultrahigh -frequency sensing using cold Rydberg atoms. Physical Review Applied, 24(3), 034022. APS

    2025

  14. [18]

    Kurzyna, S., Niewelt, B., Mazelanik, M., Wasilewski, W., Demkowicz -Dobrzański, R., & Parniak, M. (2025). Microwave-field quantum metrology with error correction enabled by Rydberg atoms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.01506

    2025

  15. [20]

    W., Xiang, D

    Zhang, Y. W., Xiang, D. S., Liao, R., Liu, H. X., Xu, B., Zhou, P., ... & Li, L. (2026). Microwave electrometry with quantum -limited resolutions in a Rydberg -atom array. Physical Review Letters, 136(11), 110802

    2026

  16. [21]

    I., Ryabtsev, I

    Beterov, I. I., Ryabtsev, I. I., Tretyakov, D. B., & Entin, V. M. (2009). Quasiclassical calculations of blackbody -radiation-induced depopulation rates and effective lifetimes of Rydberg n S, n P, and n D alkali -metal atoms with n≤ 80. Physical Review A —Atomic, Molecular, a...

    2009

  17. [22]

    B., Prajapati, N., Watterson, W

    Schlossberger, N., Talashila, R., Oliver, S. B., Prajapati, N., Watterson, W. J., & Holloway, C. L. (2026). Resolving magnetic -sublevel structure in Rydberg Autler -Townes spectra with arbitrary RF polarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.05466

    2026 arXiv

  18. [23]

    P., De Silva, A

    Sharma, S., Acharya, B. P., De Silva, A. H. N. C., Parris, N. W., Ramsey, B. J., Romans, K. L., ... & Fischer, D. (2018). All -optical atom trap as a target for MOTRIMS -like collision experiments. Physical Review A, 97(4), 043427

    2018

  19. [24]

    G., Esquivel -Ramírez, E., Carmona-Torres, G., Gardea -Flores, C.,

    Uhthoff-Rodríguez, L., Hernández -López, A., Alonso -Torres, E. G., Esquivel -Ramírez, E., Carmona-Torres, G., Gardea -Flores, C., ... & Paris -Mandoki, A. (2025). Fast magnetic coil controller for cold atom experiments. Review of Scientific Instruments, 96(10)

    2025

  20. [26]

    Bai, J., Liu, S., Wang, J., He, J., & Wang, J. (2019). Single-photon Rydberg excitation and trap- loss spectroscopy of cold cesium atoms in a magneto -optical trap by using of a 319 -nm ultraviolet laser system. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 26(3), 1-6

    2019

  21. [27]

    K., Feldbaum, D., Cubel, T., Guest, J

    Teo, B. K., Feldbaum, D., Cubel, T., Guest, J. R., Berman, P. R., & Raithel, G. (2003). Autler- Townes spectroscopy of the 5 S 1/2− 5 p 3/2− 44 d cascade of cold 85 Rb atoms. Physical Review A, 68(5), 053407

    2003

  22. [29]

    & Jia, S

    Wu, J., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Wang, L., Zhao, Y., ... & Jia, S. (2011). High sensitive trap- loss spectroscopic detection of the lowest vibrational levels of ultracold molecules. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13(42), 18921-18925

    2011

  23. [30]

    R., Ma, J., Ji, W

    Wang, L. R., Ma, J., Ji, W. B., Wang, G. P., Xiao, L. T., & Jia, S. T. (2007). Ultra -high resolution trap-loss spectroscopy of ultracold 133Cs atom long-range states in a magnetooptical trap. Laser physics, 17(9), 1171-1175

    2007

  24. [31]

    Couturier, L., Nosske, I., Hu, F., Tan, C., Qiao, C., Jiang, Y. H., ... & Weidemüller, M. (2019). Measurement of the strontium triplet Rydberg series by depletion spectroscopy of ultracold atoms. Physical Review A, 99(2), 022503

    2019

  25. [32]

    Halter, C., Miethke, A., Sillus, C., Hegde, A., & Goerlitz, A. (2023). Trap-loss spectroscopy of Rydberg states in ytterbium. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 56(5), 055001

    2023

  26. [33]

    Cao, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, L., Xiao, L., & Jia, S. (2025). Trap-loss spectroscopy of ultra-cold Rydberg atoms involved in microwave fields. Optics Express, 33(4), 7753-7762. Page 15 of 16

    2025

  27. [35]

    Prost, D., Bonnin, A., & Schwartz, S. (2025). Microwave field imaging inside an atomic cell by fluorescence thermography. Applied Physics Letters, 127(18)

    2025

  28. [36]

    A., Schwettmann, A., Kübler, H., Löw, R., Pfau, T., & Shaffer, J

    Sedlacek, J. A., Schwettmann, A., Kübler, H., Löw, R., Pfau, T., & Shaffer, J. P. (2012). Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances. Nature physics, 8(11), 819-824

    2012

  29. [37]

    A., MacKellar, A

    Downes, L. A., MacKellar, A. R., Whiting, D. J., Bourgenot, C., Adams, C. S., & Weatherill, K. J. (2020). Full-field terahertz imaging at kilohertz frame rates using atomic vapor. Physical Review X, 10(1), 011027

    2020

  30. [38]

    Nill, C., Cabot, A., Trautmann, A., Groß, C., & Lesanovsky, I. (2024). Avalanche terahertz photon detection in a Rydberg tweezer array. Physical Review Letters, 133(7), 073603

    2024

  31. [39]

    & Vutha, A

    Chigusa, S., Kasamaki, T., Kusano, T., Moroi, T., Nakayama, K., Ozawa, N., ... & Vutha, A. (2026). Detecting Dark Matter Using Optically Trapped Rydberg Atom Tweezer Arrays. Physical Review Letters, 136(15), 151801

    2026

  32. [40]

    T., Haddab, A

    Simons, M. T., Haddab, A. H., Gordon, J. A., & Holloway, C. L. (2019). A Rydberg atom - based mixer: Measuring the phase of a radio frequency wave. Applied Physics Letters, 114(11)

    2019

  33. [41]

    K., Prajapati, N., Senic, D., Simons, M

    Robinson, A. K., Prajapati, N., Senic, D., Simons, M. T., & Holloway, C. L. (2021). Determining the angle -of-arrival of a radio -frequency source with a Rydberg atom -based sensor. Applied physics letters, 118(11)

    2021

  34. [42]

    UNCERTAINTY OF STABILITY VARIANCES BASED ON FINITE DIFFERENCES

    Greenhall & Riley, “UNCERTAINTY OF STABILITY VARIANCES BASED ON FINITE DIFFERENCES” 35th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Meeting https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20050061319.pdf

  35. [43]

    Power law noise identification using the lag 1 autocorrelation by overlapping samples

    Zhou Chunlei, Zhang Qi, and Yan Shuhua. Power law noise identification using the lag 1 autocorrelation by overlapping samples. In IEEE 2011 10th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, volume 2, pages 110–113. IEEE, 2011. Page 16 of 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.