Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Photophysical comparison of liquid and mechanically exfoliated WS$_2$ monolayers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2201.03384 v1 pith:5FB44QTT submitted 2022-01-10 physics.app-ph

classification physics.app-ph
keywords exfoliatedliquiddevicedevicesdispersionsexfoliationmaterialsmechanically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are desired as active materials in optoelectronic devices due to their strong excitonic effects. They can be exfoliated from their parent layered materials with low-cost and for mass production via a liquid exfoliation method. However, the device application of TMDs prepared by liquid phase exfoliation is limited by their poor photoluminescence quantum efficiencies (PLQE). It is crucial to understand the reason to low PLQE for their practical device development. Here we evaluate the quality of monolayer-enriched liquid phase exfoliated (LPE) WS$_2$ dispersions by systematically investigating their optical and photophysical properties and contrasting with mechanically exfoliated (ME) WS2 monolayers. An in-depth understanding of the exciton dynamics is gained with ultrafast pump-probe measurements. We reveal that the energy transfer between monolayer and few-layers in LPE WS$_2$ dispersions is a substantial reason for their quenched PL. In addition, we show that LPE WS$_2$ is promising to build high performance optoelectronic devices with excellent optical quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools