Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Energy quantization for a singular super-Liouville boundary value problem

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that blow-up energy for the singular super-Liouville boundary problem is quantized into prescribed multiples of $2\pi$.

desk verdict A plausible completion of the energy quantization program for singular super-Liouville boundary problems, but the omitted neck-domain argument is load-bearing and needs to be supplied. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09344 v1 pith:5FIFIWHS submitted 2019-08-25 math.DG math.AP

Jürgen Jost , Chunqin Zhou , Miaomiao Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.AP MSC 35J6035A2035B44
keywords Super-LiouvilleequationPohozaevconstantConicalsingularityBlow-upEnergyidentityBoundaryvalueproblemChiralcondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes an energy-quantization theorem for blowing-up solutions of the super-Liouville boundary value problem on Riemann surfaces whose metric has conical singularities, including at the boundary. The central claim is that the total energy lost at a blow-up point can only take discrete values: $4\pi$ at a regular interior point, $4\pi(1+\alpha)$ at an interior conical point, $2\pi$ at a regular boundary point, and $2\pi(1+\alpha)$ at a boundary corner of angle $\pi(1+\alpha)$. Because conical singularities destroy the conformal invariance that normally powers blow-up analysis, the proof replaces the Noether-current argument with the vanishing of a Pohozaev constant, which characterizes removability of isolated singularities. If the theorem is right, sequences of solutions either stay compact or concentrate only in these prescribed quanta, a prerequisite for variational existence results and refined Moser-Trudinger inequalities on singular surfaces.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Pohozaev constant for the local singular boundary problem, a boundary-integral quantity derived from the Pohozaev identity. For a solution with an isolated singularity at a boundary point it takes the form $C_B(u,\Psi)=\gamma^2/(2\pi)$, where $\gamma$ is the logarithmic coefficient of $u$ at the singularity; the singularity is removable if and only if this constant vanishes. This constant replaces the holomorphic quadratic differential that conformal invariance would normally provide, and it does the same work: it controls the asymptotic profile near the singularity, forces the spinor decay needed to rule out energy loss on necks, and determines the local bubble mass $2\pi(1+\alpha)$ at a boundary corner.

What would settle it

Take a sequence of regular solutions to the local boundary system (4) with exactly one boundary conical blow-up point at $0$, rescale as in Section 6, and compute the neck integral $\int_{A^+_{\delta,R,n}} |\Psi_n|^4\,dv$ under $\delta\to 0$, $R\to\infty$, $n\to\infty$; if the limit is any positive number rather than $0$, equation (52) fails and the quantization theorem collapses. A concrete route is to check whether Claim 2's finite partition of the neck into annuli with $\int_{A^+_k}|x|^{2\alpha}e^{2u_n}\le 1/(4\Lambda^2)$ holds for a model sequence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that for a sequence of regular solutions $(u_n,\psi_n)$ of the singular super-Liouville boundary system with uniformly bounded weighted energies, the possible limits of $\int_M (2e^{2u_n}-e^{u_n}|\psi_n|^2)dv_g + \int_{\partial M} c e^{u_n}d\sigma_g$ are exactly $4\pi N + 2\pi N + \sum_j 4\pi(1+\alpha_j)\{0,1\} + \sum_j 2\pi(1+\alpha_j)\{0,1\}$. More locally, under a mild oscillation bound on small circles around an isolated blow-up point $p$, the localized blow-up value $m(p)$ is $4\pi$ for interior regular points, $2\pi$ for boundary regular points, and $2\pi(1+\alpha)$ for boundary conical points. The proof also shows that the spinor field satisfies an energy identity across the neck regions, so no $L^4$ energy is lost between bubbles, and consequently $u_n$ tends to $-\infty$ uniformly away from the blow-up set.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the global quantization rests on the claim that the spinor's $L^4$ energy on the thin annular neck regions between blow-up bubbles vanishes before any bubble energy is counted; if this no-neck-energy assertion fails, the total energy limit need not equal the sum of quantized bubble energies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Theorem 1.1 holds, any blowing-up sequence has total energy limit composed of finitely many $4\pi$, $4\pi(1+\alpha)$, $2\pi$, and $2\pi(1+\alpha)$ quanta, so the blow-up set can contain only finitely many points.
  • Combined with the Gauss-Bonnet formula, the quantization gives Theorem 1.2: below a critical topological and geometric threshold the blow-up set is empty, and at the threshold it contains at most one point.
  • The spinor energy identity (9) means that no $L^4$ energy is hidden in the neck domains between bubbles, which is exactly what makes the total energy additive over the bubble tree.
  • The removability criterion (Theorem 4.5) gives a clean dichotomy: at an isolated boundary singularity either the Pohozaev constant vanishes and the solution extends smoothly, or it does not and a quantized bubble is generated.
  • These results supply the analytic foundation the paper cites for existence proofs by refined Moser-Trudinger inequalities, since compactness and concentration behavior are the missing input for variational arguments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Pohozaev-constant mechanism should transfer to other non-conformally-invariant two-dimensional systems, such as Dirac-harmonic maps with conical boundary data, where an analogous $C_B=0$ removability criterion would yield the same type of quantization.
  • A testable consequence is that the local mass at a boundary conical point is independent of the conformal factor $V(x)$ and of the boundary constant $c>0$; explicit radial or self-similar solutions of the rescaled system (31) could be checked for the profile $u\sim -2(1+\alpha)\log|x|$ at infinity.
  • The oscillation bound in Theorem 1.6 could be probed by constructing sequences where $\max_{S^+_{\delta_0}} u_n - \min_{S^+_{\delta_0}} u_n$ diverges while the total energy stays bounded; if the mass still quantizes, the condition is unnecessary for the local value.
  • The omitted Claim 2 in the proof of Theorem 1.4 is the most exposed step; a direct verification for a model annular sequence would either close the gap or reveal a missing hypothesis in the neck argument.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the blow-up behavior and energy quantization for a super-Liouville type boundary value problem on a compact Riemann surface with conical singularities at the boundary, under chiral boundary conditions for the spinor. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that for a sequence of solutions with uniform energy bounds, any nonzero limit of the total energy (interior term 2e^{2u} - e^u|ψ|^2 plus boundary term c e^u) must be a sum of quantized contributions: 4π for interior regular blow-up points, 2π for boundary regular blow-up points, and 4π(1+α_j), 2π(1+α_j) for interior and boundary conical singularities respectively. The proof strategy is to derive a local Pohozaev identity, prove a removability theorem for boundary singularities via the vanishing Pohozaev constant, establish an energy identity for the spinor by ruling out neck energy, and then compute the local blow-up values. The paper also includes a Brezis-Merle type concentration-compactness theorem and a global quantization argument using Green's functions.

Significance. If fully established, the result would be a substantial advance: it extends the quantization theory for super-Liouville equations to boundary value problems with conical points, where conformal invariance is lost, and it proposes a mechanism based on the Pohozaev constant in place of the Noether-current argument. The paper is valuable for its detailed Pohozaev identity (Proposition 4.1), the removability theorem (Theorem 4.5), and the global Green-function argument in Section 9. The logical structure of the proof is transparent and the main theorems are clearly stated. However, the current manuscript leaves two load-bearing analytic estimates unproved: Lemma 4.6 (spinor decay) and Claim 2 used in the no-neck energy argument of Theorem 1.4. The latter also contains an undefined threshold. Since these estimates feed directly into Theorems 1.5 and 1.6 and hence into Theorem 1.1, the gaps must be closed before the main quantization claim can be considered established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 1.4 / Section 6, Claim 2] Claim 2 in the proof of Theorem 1.4 is stated and then dismissed with the sentence 'the proof ... is now standard, so we omit it.' This is not a routine omission: the displayed inequality ∫_{A^+_k} |x|^{2α} e^{2u_n} ≤ 1/(4Λ²) involves a threshold Λ that is not defined in the claim. Elsewhere in Section 6, Λ denotes the limit t_n/ρ_n in Case II.2, which can be zero or infinity, so the threshold is not well posed in general. More importantly, the subsequent summation (57) requires a uniform upper bound N_k ≤ N_0 independent of n, and the proof of such a uniform bound is not given. If N_k grows with n, the factor N_0 ε^{1/4} in (57) cannot be absorbed, and the conclusion (52) that there is no neck energy for the spinor would not follow. Since (52) is used in Theorem 1.4 and again in the proofs of Theorems 1.5 and 1.6, this is a load-bearing gap. Because the conical weight |x|^{2α} destroys conformal invariance, importing the argument verbatim from [JWZZ1, JZZ1, Z1] is not automatic; the authors need to provide a complete proof of Claim 2 with uniform constants, or cite a precise result in those papers that covers the conical-weight case.
  2. [Section 4, Lemma 4.6] Lemma 4.6 asserts the spinor decay estimates |φ(x)||x|^{1/2} + |∇φ(x)||x|^{3/2} ≤ C(∫_{B^+_{2|x|}} |φ|^4 dx)^{1/4} and the improved estimate (29) under the assumption e^{2v} = O(|x|^{-2(1+α)-ε}). The lemma is introduced with 'By using similar arguments, we can also get the following lemma for the general case' and no proof is given. This lemma is used in the proof of Theorem 4.5 to control the spinor near the boundary singularity and in Proposition 5.1 to derive the asymptotic behavior of ψ at infinity. Because the equation contains the conical factor |x|^{α}, the decay behavior is not a direct consequence of the α=0 case in [JZZ1]; a proof or a precise statement of the corresponding lemma in [JZZ3] or [JZZ1], together with an explanation of the modifications needed for the singular boundary problem, must be supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 1.1] The notation 'N = {0,1,2,...,k}' is used multiplicatively in the formula '4πN + 2πN + ...'. This is ambiguous: the set N should not be multiplied by 4π and 2π; please clarify that the first two terms mean 4π n_1 + 2π n_2 with n_1, n_2 ranging over nonnegative integers, or introduce separate integer variables.
  2. [Section 5, Proposition 5.1, Step 3] Immediately after the equality d = 2π(1+α), the text states 'we can improve the estimate for e^{2u} to e^{2u} ≤ C|x|^{-4(1+π)}'. The exponent should be -4(1+α), not -4(1+π).
  3. [Section 2, Proposition 2.1] Proposition 2.1 asserts conformal invariance of the functional EB under conformal diffeomorphisms preserving the divisor, but no proof is provided. Since the rescaling formulas (11) are used repeatedly in the blow-up analysis, a short verification or a precise reference should be included.
  4. [Proof of Theorem 1.1] The definition 'p = q/(q−1) > 2' is confusingly written; it implies q ∈ (1,2). Please state explicitly that q is chosen in (1,2) so that p > 2, which is the condition needed for the Sobolev embedding into L∞.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'funtional' (page 3), 'indenty' (Section 4 heading), 'Propostion' (e.g., in the proof of Theorem 1.4 and in Section 5), and 'Pohazaev' (in Theorem 4.5). These should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circularity: quantization values are forced by the Pohozaev identity; the omitted neck-domain proof is a rigor gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central quantization theorem is not circular: the quantized values 4π, 2π, and 2π(1+α) are outputs of the Pohozaev identity, not inputs. Proposition 4.1 proves the boundary Pohozaev identity in this paper, and Theorem 4.5 derives the removability criterion CB = γ^2/2π = 0 by a direct computation. Proposition 5.1 obtains the bubble energy d = 2π(1+α) from the Pohozaev identity and decay estimates, rather than assuming it. Theorem 1.6 derives m(p)^2/(2π) = (1+α)m(p), hence m(p) = 2π(1+α), again forced by the identity. The global formula in Theorem 1.1 then sums these local values with the Gauss-Bonnet constraint; no quantity is fitted and no prediction is defined in terms of the conclusion. The main caveat is that Theorem 1.4's no-neck-energy estimate (52) rests on Lemma 6.1 and Claim 2, which are stated without proof: Lemma 6.1 says 'we just state the Lemma and omit the proof', and Claim 2 says 'The proof of this claim is very similar to those in [JWZZ1, JZZ1, Z1] and the argument is now standard, so we omit it.' Because the conical weight |x|^{2α} destroys conformal invariance, importing the α=0 neck argument is not automatic, and the undefined threshold 1/(4Λ²) in Claim 2 is a typo that should likely read 1/(4C0²). This is a genuine rigor gap and a correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the cited works are independent peer-reviewed results, and the paper does not reduce any theorem to its own assumptions by definition. The low circularity score reflects only the heavy reliance on prior results by overlapping authors and the omitted justifications, not any constructional equivalence between inputs and outputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. The constants c and α_j are inputs of the problem: c is the given constant in the boundary coupling and α_j are the cone orders of the divisor A. The quoted axiom ledger lists the background results that carry the load of the proof, most of which come from the authors' prior published work or from standard elliptic theory.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Spinor decay estimate (Lemma 4.6): |φ(x)||x|^{1/2} + |∇φ(x)||x|^{3/2} ≤ C (∫ |φ|^4)^{1/4} near a boundary singularity.
    Stated without proof in Section 4, adapted from [JWZZ1, JZZ1]. Used in the proof of Theorem 4.5 to compute the Pohozaev constant and prove removability of boundary singularities.
  • domain assumption Removability of interior singularities (Theorem 4.3 from [JZZ3]): a local singularity is removable iff the Pohozaev constant vanishes, with C(u,Ψ) = γ²/(4π).
    Invoked in Section 7 to rule out boundedness of u_n away from the boundary blow-up set; the boundary analog is proven in this paper as Theorem 4.5.
  • domain assumption Classification of entire super-Liouville bubbles on R^2, S^2 and spherical caps from [JWZ1, JZZ3], including energy values 4π, 2π(1+α) and conformal extension to S^2 or S^2_{c'}.
    Used in Sections 5 and 6 to identify the bubbles arising from rescaling and to compute their energies. These are previously published classifications with independent proofs.
  • standard math There are no nontrivial harmonic spinors on S^2.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.4, Case 2, to show the limiting spinor in the neck is zero and to obtain the no-neck-energy property.
  • standard math Standard elliptic regularity, Sobolev embedding, and Harnack inequalities for Neumann boundary problems apply to the local models.
    Invoked throughout Sections 3, 4 and 6 without proof; standard background in elliptic PDE.
  • standard math The conformal model g = e^{2φ}|x|^{2α}|dx|² near conical points with φ ∈ W^{2,p}, and the Gauss-Bonnet formula with corners, from Troyanov [T1].
    Sets up the local singular boundary problem and the global topology. Standard in the field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Energy quantization for a singular super-Liouville boundary value problem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5FIFIWHS

@misc{pith2026190809344,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Energy quantization for a singular super-Liouville boundary value problem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5FIFIWHS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09344}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we develop the blow-up analysis and establish the energy quantization for solutions to super-Liouville type equations on Riemann surfaces with conical singularities at the boundary. In other problems in geometric analysis, the blow-up analysis usually strongly utilizes conformal invariance, which yields a Noether current from which strong estimates can be derived. Here, however, the conical singularities destroy conformal invariance. Therefore, we develop another, more general, method that uses the vanishing of the Pohozaev constant for such solutions to deduce the removability of boundary singularities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. Ahn, C. Rim, M. Stanishkov, Exact one-point function of N=1 super-Liouville theory with boundary , Nucl. Phys. B 636 [FS] (2002) 497-513

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Ammann, E

    B. Ammann, E. Humbert, B. Morel, Mass

    work page

  3. [3]

    H. Baum, T. Friedrich, R. Grunewald, and

    work page

  4. [4]

    Brezis, F

    H. Brezis, F. Merle, Uniform estimates and blow-up behavior for solutions of - u=V(x)e^ u in two dimensions. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 16 (1991), no. 8-9, 1223-1253

    work page 1991

  5. [5]

    Bartolucci, A compactness result for periodic multivortices in the electroweak theory , Nonlinear Analysis 53 (2003) 277-297

    D. Bartolucci, A compactness result for periodic multivortices in the electroweak theory , Nonlinear Analysis 53 (2003) 277-297

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Bartolucci, C

    D. Bartolucci, C. C. Chen, C.-S. Lin, G. Tarantello, Profile of blow-up solutions to mean field equations with singular data , Comm. PDE 29 (2004) 1241-1265

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Bartolucci, F

    D. Bartolucci, F. De Marchis, A. Malchiodi, Supercritical conformal metrics on surfaces with conical singularities , Int. Math. Res. Not. 24 (2011), 5625-5643

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Bartolucci, E

    D. Bartolucci, E. Montefusco, Blow-up analysis, existence and qualitative properties of solutions of the two-dimensional Emden-Fowler equation with singular potential. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 30 (2007), pp. 2309-2327

    work page 2007

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Bartolucci, G

    D. Bartolucci, G. Tarantello, Liouville type equations with singular data and their applications to periodic multivortices for the electroweak theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 229 (2002) 3-47

    2002

  2. [10]

    Bartolucci, G

    D. Bartolucci, G. Tarantello, The Liouville Equationwith Singular Data: A Concentration-Compactness Principle via a Local Representation Formula , Journal of Differential Equations 185, 161-180 (2002)

    2002

  3. [11]

    J. Bao, L. H. Wang, C. Q. Zhou, Blow-up analysis for solutions to Neumann boundary value problem . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 418 (2014), 142-162

    2014

  4. [12]

    W. Y. Ding, J. Jost, J. Y. Li, G. F. Wang, Existence results for mean field equations , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, Anal. Non Lineaire 16 (1999), 653-666

    1999

  5. [13]

    Djadli, A

    Z. Djadli, A. Malchildi, Existence of conformal metrics with constant Q-curvature , Ann. Math. 168 (2008), 813-858

    2008

  6. [14]

    W. Chen, C. Li, Prescribing Gaussian Curvatures on Surfaces with Conical Singularities , J.Geom.Anal. 1 (1991) 359-372

    1991

  7. [15]

    W. Chen, C. Li, Classification of solutions of some nonlinear elliptic equations, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991), 615-623

    1991

  8. [16]

    W. Y. Ding, G. Tian, Energy identity for a class of approximate harmonic maps from surfaces , Comm. Anal. Geom. 3(1996), 543-554

    1996

  9. [17]

    Fukuda, K, Hosomichi, Super-Liouville theory with boundary , Nucl

    T. Fukuda, K, Hosomichi, Super-Liouville theory with boundary , Nucl. Phys, B 635 (2002) 215-254

    2002

  10. [18]

    Y. X. Guo, J. Q. Liou, Blow-up analysis for solutions of the laplacian equation with exponential Neumann boundary condition in dimension two . Commun. Contemp. Math. 8 (2006), 737-761

    2006

  11. [19]

    Hitchin, Harmonic spinors, Adv

    N. Hitchin, Harmonic spinors, Adv. Math. 14(1974), 1-55

    1974

  12. [20]

    Hijazi, S

    O. Hijazi, S. Montiel, A. Rold a n, Eigenvalue boundary problems for the Dirac operator. Comm.Math.Phys. 231(2002), no.3, 375-390

    2002

  13. [21]

    Jost, Riemannian Geometry and geometric analysis, 6th edition, Springer, 2011

    J. Jost, Riemannian Geometry and geometric analysis, 6th edition, Springer, 2011

    2011

  14. [22]

    J. Jost, G. Wang and C. Q. Zhou, super-Liouville equations on closed Riemann surface , Comm. PDE, 32 (2007) 1103-1128

    2007

  15. [23]

    J. Jost, G. Wang and C. Q. Zhou, Metrics of constant curvature on a Riemann surface with two corners on the boundary , Ann. I.H. Poincare-AN, 26 (2009) 437-456

    2009

  16. [24]

    J. Jost, G. Wang, C. Q. Zhou, M. M. Zhu, Energy identities and blow-up analysis for solutions of the super Liouville equation , J. Math. Pures Appl. 92 (2009), 295-312

    2009

  17. [25]

    J. Jost, G. Wang, C. Q. Zhou, M. M. Zhu, The boundary value problem for the super-Liouville equation , Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Anal. Non Lineaire. Volume 31, Issue 4, 2014, 685-706

    2014

  18. [26]

    J. Jost, C. Q. Zhou, M. M. Zhu, The qualitative boundary behavior of blow-up solutions of the super-Liouville equations , J. Math. Pures Appl. 101 (2014), no. 5, 689-715

    2014

  19. [27]

    J. Jost, C. Q. Zhou, M. M. Zhu, A local estimate for the super-Liouville equations on closed Riemann surfaces , Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., Volume 53, Issue 1-2, 2015, 247-264

    2015

  20. [28]

    J. Jost, C. Q. Zhou, M. M. Zhu, Vanishing pohozaev constant and removability of singularities , J. Differential Geometry, Vol. 111, No. 1 (2019), pp. 91-144

    2019

  21. [29]

    H. B. Lawson, M. Michelsohn, Spin geometry . Princeton Mathe. Series, 38. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989)

    1989

  22. [30]

    Y. Y. Li, I. Shafrir, Blow-up analysis for solutions of - u=Ve u in dimension two, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 43 (1994), 1255-1270

    1994

  23. [31]

    Y. Y. Li, Harnack type inequality: The method of moving planes , Comm. Math. Phys. 200(1999), 421-444

    1999

  24. [32]

    P. L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The limit case, part I. Revista Matem\' a tica Iberoamericana, 1(1), 1985, 145-201

    1985

  25. [33]

    Liouville, Sur l'\' equation aux diff\' erences partielles d^2 dudv 2a^2 =0 , J

    J. Liouville, Sur l'\' equation aux diff\' erences partielles d^2 dudv 2a^2 =0 , J. Math. Pures Appl. 18 , 71 (1853)

  26. [34]

    A. M. Polyakov, Gauge fields and strings , Harwood, 1987

    1987

  27. [35]

    J. N. G. N. Prata, The super-Liouville equation on the half-line , Phys. Lett. B 405 (1997) 271-279

    1997

  28. [36]

    Sacks and K

    J. Sacks and K. Uhlenbeck, The existence of minimal immersions of 2-spheres , Ann. Math. 113 , 1981, 1--24

    1981

  29. [37]

    Struwe, Variational methods , Springer, 4th ed., 2008

    M. Struwe, Variational methods , Springer, 4th ed., 2008

    2008

  30. [38]

    Tarantello, A quantization property for blow-up solutions of singular Liouville-type equations , Journal of Functional Analysis 219 (2005) 368-399

    G. Tarantello, A quantization property for blow-up solutions of singular Liouville-type equations , Journal of Functional Analysis 219 (2005) 368-399

    2005

  31. [39]

    Troyanov, Prescribing curvature on compact surfaces with conical singularities , Trans

    M. Troyanov, Prescribing curvature on compact surfaces with conical singularities , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 324 (1991), 793-821

    1991

  32. [40]

    M. Troyanov, Metrics of constant curvature on a sphere with two conical singularities , Differential geometry (Pe\= n \' i scola, 1988), 296-306, Lecture Notes in Math., 1410, Springer, Berlin, 1989

    1988

  33. [41]

    T. H. Parker and J. G. Wolfson, Pseudo-holomorphic maps and bubble trees , J. Geom. Anal.3 (1993), 63-98

    1993

  34. [42]

    R. G. Ye, Gromov's compactness theorem for pseudo-holomorphic curves , Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 342 (2), 671-694 (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    M. M. Zhu, Dirac-harmonic maps from degenerating spin surfaces I: the Neveu-Schwarz case , Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 35 (2009), no. 2, 169-189

    2009

  36. [44]

    M. M. Zhu, Quantization for a nonlinear Dirac equation , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 144 (2016), no. 10, 4533-4544

    2016

  37. [45]

    Zhang, C

    T. Zhang, C. Q. Zhou, Liouville type equation with exponential Neumann boundary condition and with singular data . Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 57 (2018), 163-195

    2018

  38. [46]

    Zhang, C

    T. Zhang, C. L. Zhou, C. Q. Zhou, Quantization of the blow-up value for the Liouville equation with exponential Neumann boundary condition . Commun. Math. Stat. 6 (2018) 29-48

    2018

  39. [47]

    Lawson, H. B. and Michelsohn, M

  40. [48]

    Li, Y. Y. and Shafrir,I.,

  41. [49]

    Li, Yan Yan, Harnack type inequality: the method of moving planes, Comm

  42. [50]

    A. M. Polyakov, Quantum geometry of fermionic strings, Phys

  43. [51]

    J. N. G. N. Prata, The super-Liouville equation on the

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.