Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The performance guarantee of randomized perfect voting trees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.03145 v1 pith:5FM3H5SE submitted 2019-05-08 math.CO math.DS

classification math.COmath.DS
keywords treesguaranteeperformancerandomizedvotingachievablebalancedcannot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this note we study randomized voting trees, previously introduced by Fisher, Procaccia and Samorodnitsky. They speculate that a non-trivial performance guarantee may be achievable using randomized, balanced trees whose height is carefully chosen. We explore some connections to the so-called Volterra quadratic stochastic operators, and show that uniformly random voting trees cannot provide a performance guarantee that is linear in the number of individuals.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools