Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning

As of 13 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 40 of 40 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.09251.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2606.09251 v1

Coverage vector

measured 40 of 40 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

measured 40 of 40 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

40 of 40 outbound references displayed

verified exact10
verified fuzzy0
unresolved23
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch7

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation eedbe194-5f42-418c-be50-df9bf6c2c2fc · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , articleno =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , articleno =

Reference 1

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.215943Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation db038809-ff05-47ed-84a0-e1f5fc6232df · outbound

This paper cites CLEAR : A Comprehensive Linguistic Evaluation of Argument Rewriting by Large Language Models.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning CLEAR : A Comprehensive Linguistic Evaluation of Argument Rewriting by Large Language Models

Reference 2

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.192714Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation df78a2e1-aeee-4d61-9356-3dde45afd6bd · outbound

This paper cites Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays

Reference 3

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.194618Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation de6c2e43-0732-4d93-b125-e4977c037108 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Unresolved cited work

Reference 4

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.217983Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation 871dc86d-a7a0-4d2e-9943-c36676d4e950 · outbound

This paper cites Learning Latent Personas of Film Characters.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Learning Latent Personas of Film Characters

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 12871029-58a9-444e-94d1-6e76a723e044 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , year =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , year =

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2d33c484-a5c1-4217-9c11-c81c3101f02f · outbound

This paper cites AL: An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation Skills , booktitle =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning AL: An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation Skills , booktitle =

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7ce07ca9-054b-422b-8181-a904e19c51c8 · outbound

This paper cites Context Dependent Claim Detection.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Context Dependent Claim Detection

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2e88a9c6-c85c-4751-8e16-d2ac7c256f5a · outbound

This paper cites \ Gurevych, I.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning \ Gurevych, I

Reference 9

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.196392Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation c19c0ca4-e89c-42a3-8292-5a995e12247c · outbound

This paper cites A News Editorial Corpus for Mining Argumentation Strategies.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning A News Editorial Corpus for Mining Argumentation Strategies

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7119d1ea-e8c1-4068-8b67-310ee952976f · outbound

This paper cites Social Epistemology , volume=.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Social Epistemology , volume=

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6afd2882-a19c-4671-9456-df2b8b41ecae · outbound

This paper cites Annual review of political science , volume=.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Annual review of political science , volume=

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 433612e4-7729-44b5-a9d5-0996cdceffea · outbound

This paper cites , title =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning , title =

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 307593a2-5121-43c3-a9fa-25b43538ebcf · outbound

This paper cites 1969 , address =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning 1969 , address =

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 931ca22a-d18f-45c2-af77-57c519e62fd7 · outbound

This paper cites 1993 , address =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning 1993 , address =

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3ed8b513-07f2-4220-9d12-f021195bf7ed · outbound

This paper cites , title =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning , title =

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation aed702c9-d8b0-46cb-a697-7bc927bfae09 · outbound

This paper cites 2012 , address =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning 2012 , address =

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation be796572-873f-45b6-a9bd-58225a119ae4 · outbound

This paper cites Behavioral and brain sciences , volume=.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Behavioral and brain sciences , volume=

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 937b8852-e2f4-46e3-8687-d9e698c04e78 · outbound

This paper cites Which argument is more convincing? Analyzing and predicting convincingness of Web arguments using bidirectional LSTM.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Which argument is more convincing? Analyzing and predicting convincingness of Web arguments using bidirectional LSTM

Reference 19

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.203778Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation c84c4b40-961d-4aed-86ad-2c6347e0ccf7 · outbound

This paper cites Wachsmuth, M.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Wachsmuth, M

Reference 20

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.190910Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation 430bf689-feff-4d1b-ae24-05149301c45a · outbound

This paper cites Modeling Perspective Using A daptor G rammars.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Modeling Perspective Using A daptor G rammars

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c7567ea0-3d43-40cf-b8d1-15aa2dae17fe · outbound

This paper cites Computational Linguistics 43(3), 619–659 (Sep 2017).

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Computational Linguistics 43(3), 619–659 (Sep 2017)

Reference 22

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.213219Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation 9e109761-7d3b-4fc8-bd08-4ac0f0c8a9d8 · outbound

This paper cites Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models

Reference 23

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-03T01:17:30.618131Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation 469d1214-c37d-41e3-b4c7-aee1a7c9c870 · outbound

This paper cites Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering

Reference 24

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-07-03T01:17:30.620602Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation b45d08bc-414e-4ab6-b0b8-31526343c3fe · outbound

This paper cites Connor Kissane, Robert Krzyzanowski, Arthur Conmy, and Neel Nanda.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Connor Kissane, Robert Krzyzanowski, Arthur Conmy, and Neel Nanda

Reference 25

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.209047Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation 7b47d50a-9ba1-4ea1-85fb-a9f8567a7427 · outbound

This paper cites Anthropic Research , year =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Anthropic Research , year =

Reference 26

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 813b2fde-de98-42ad-91e6-e4ff4bfd6850 · outbound

This paper cites , title =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning , title =

Reference 27

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d9f2bed5-8630-4653-bde4-064d1de2e8ca · outbound

This paper cites 2018 , address =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning 2018 , address =

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6bc84373-e5a4-4d33-8ed2-0cc2044225a1 · outbound

This paper cites A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9eac6f85-2388-4f05-b9ea-0c3ee82a2c52 · outbound

This paper cites Argument Quality Assessment in the Age of Instruction-Following Large Language Models.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Argument Quality Assessment in the Age of Instruction-Following Large Language Models

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 5c09d550-b11c-4649-94ad-e913ac0e2ab9 · outbound

This paper cites Argument-based Detection and Classification of Fallacies in Political Debates , booktitle =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Argument-based Detection and Classification of Fallacies in Political Debates , booktitle =

Reference 31

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.221450Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation 11c710b4-8c5b-47d6-a58a-7a54a0295f2f · outbound

This paper cites Are Large Language Models Reliable Argument Quality Annotators?.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Are Large Language Models Reliable Argument Quality Annotators?

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 2135f266-a609-4288-829f-5cb4a20cec5b · outbound

This paper cites ``Let ' s Argue Both Sides'': Argument Generation Can Force Small Models to Utilize Previously Inaccessible Reasoning Capabilities.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning ``Let ' s Argue Both Sides'': Argument Generation Can Force Small Models to Utilize Previously Inaccessible Reasoning Capabilities

Reference 33

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.207392Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation 74c54a8a-df2b-4ac7-af20-971fbac37011 · outbound

This paper cites ARTIST : A Learning Support System for Fostering Students' Argumentative Writing Skills.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning ARTIST : A Learning Support System for Fostering Students' Argumentative Writing Skills

Reference 34

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a45ea5bb-3601-4862-9c5c-d260f4356891 · outbound

This paper cites Political Ideology Detection Using Recursive Neural Networks.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Political Ideology Detection Using Recursive Neural Networks

Reference 35

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.205451Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation a8c99ba3-e8ec-4c6c-9153-680c72a20803 · outbound

This paper cites Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Using Argument Mining to Assess the Argumentation Quality of Essays

Reference 36

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 24c878a2-5900-4361-9a1d-9a7c22c37650 · outbound

This paper cites Language and Ideology in Congress , urldate =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Language and Ideology in Congress , urldate =

Reference 37

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-27T16:43:48.195041Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 601b234c-a851-4781-9553-6140f7b5a49d · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law , pages =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law , pages =

Reference 38

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.211482Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation d3deb602-e93e-4fd9-8c2d-2aa42b7436a1 · outbound

This paper cites Computational Linguistics , author =.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Computational Linguistics , author =

Reference 39

Resolution: metadata mismatch; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.202033Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Observation 48aecc1e-fc06-46e4-a31c-3fc5e16e6d77 · outbound

This paper cites Argumentation Quality Assessment: Theory vs.

TruthSplit: Operationalizing Conditional Validity in Arguments Through Multi-Perspective Reasoning Argumentation Quality Assessment: Theory vs

Reference 40

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-06-27T16:51:06.219668Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.