Frasian Inference
classification
📊 stat.ME
keywords
casesdiscussaccountagreementagreementsarxivattentionbayes
pith:5GV2XI4R Add to your LaTeX paper
What is a Pith Number?\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{5GV2XI4R}
Prints a linked pith:5GV2XI4R badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more
read the original abstract
Don Fraser has given an interesting account of the agreements and disagreements between Bayesian posterior probabilities and confidence levels. In this comment I discuss some cases where the lack of such agreement is extreme. I then discuss a few cases where it is possible to have Bayes procedures with frequentist validity. Such frequentist-Bayesian---or Frasian---methods deserve more attention [arXiv:1112.5582].
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.