Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 101 references

Augmented Reality User Interfaces for First Responders: A Scoping Literature Review

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ninety peer-reviewed papers on augmented-reality interfaces for first responders are organized into a six-facet taxonomy and a catalog of 12 recurring interface elements, giving the field a common design vocabulary and a list of gaps.

desk verdict A useful, competently reported scoping review whose new taxonomy and interface catalog are worth having, despite search-coverage gaps that soften the 'comprehensive map' claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09236 v1 pith:5IQKCANI submitted 2025-06-10 cs.HC

Erin Argo , Tanim Ahmed , Sarah Gable , Callie Hampton , Jeronimo Grandi , Regis Kopper This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords augmentedrealityfirstrespondersscopingreviewtaxonomyinterfaceelementssituationalawarenesspublicsafetyhead-mounteddisplay
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims to be the first scoping review that comprehensively maps augmented-reality user interfaces for first responders. It screened 1,751 records from ACM, IEEE, ProQuest, and Scopus, kept 90 peer-reviewed papers, and organized their designs into a six-facet taxonomy: operating environment, discipline, data requirements, display hardware, display context, and output channel. Across those papers it also catalogued 12 recurring interface elements, from edge detection and X-ray views to navigation aids and on-demand menus. The review's value is that it gives researchers and developers a common vocabulary and a gap list: little multimodal feedback, sparse cross-discipline designs, and few rigorous evaluations of effectiveness.

What carries the argument

The carrying device is the faceted taxonomy, which classifies each system along six independent dimensions so that any combination of facet values describes a potential AR configuration; the paper pairs it with a catalog of 12 interface elements derived from the included studies. The taxonomy does the argument's work because it converts a scattered set of prototypes into a structured design space, and the gap analysis is read off that structure.

What would settle it

A replication that broadens the search—for example, adding Web of Science and PubMed, adding terms like 'wearable display' and 'see-through display,' and hand-searching the reference lists of the 90 included papers—would test the map's completeness. If such a search surfaced a sizeable set of relevant AR UI papers that do not fit into the six facets or 12 interface elements, or that substantially change the reported counts (e.g., many more haptic or auditory interfaces), the claim that Figure 4 maps the domain would be weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the design space of AR user interfaces for first responders can be organized by six orthogonal facets—operating environment (field, command center, training), public-safety discipline (EMS, firefighting, law enforcement, other), primary data requirement (environment, physiological, patient/suspect, context-unaware), display hardware (head-mounted, handheld, stationary), display context (spatial augmentation vs heads-up display), and output channel (visual, with occasional auditory or haptic)—and that 12 interface elements (edge detection, object highlighting, X-ray, spatial reconstruction, gaze indicators, navigation aids, alerts, on-demand interfaces, annotations, augmented support, augmented enhancement, and vitals monitors) recur across the 90 papers. The paper argues that this taxonomy and element catalog constitute the first comprehensive map of the domain, that navigation interfaces—especially points of interest and 2D maps—dominate the literature because of their role in situational awareness, and that the gaps it identifies (limited multimodal feedback, few cross-discipline or modular designs, scarce comparative evaluation) are features of the literature itself.

Load-bearing premise

The map's completeness rests on the assumption that a keyword search of four English-language databases, restricted to terms in titles, abstracts, or keywords, retrieves a representative sample of the relevant literature; the paper acknowledges in Section 2.6 that papers not matching the search string were excluded.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers can use the taxonomy to position new AR designs and identify unpopulated combinations, such as cross-discipline or multimodal configurations.
  • Developers get a checklist of interface elements with known design challenges, including visual clutter, cognitive load, and gesture reliability under stress.
  • The scarcity of comparative evaluations means effectiveness claims for most elements remain unproven, so future work should prioritize controlled comparisons against traditional methods.
  • Hands-free, context-aware, and modular interface design is identified as a priority direction for the field.
  • The pronounced growth in publications after 2016, tied to consumer XR hardware releases, suggests hardware cycles drive research attention in this domain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The taxonomy's completeness is only as good as the search string; adding synonyms like 'wearable display' or 'see-through display' and searching forward and backward citations would likely surface additional papers and could reveal element types the 90-paper corpus missed.
  • The near-absence of haptic and auditory output (about 2 haptic and 10 auditory papers) may reflect publication bias toward visual AR rather than a true judgment that non-visual channels are ineffective, given that reviewed user feedback explicitly called for head-vibration alerts.
  • The paper's own evidence suggests the field is pre-paradigmatic: most papers propose systems, few evaluate them, so the reported 'gaps' are as much about evaluation culture as about the design space itself.
  • A practical extension would be to operationalize the taxonomy as a searchable database or generative design tool that first responder agencies could filter by facet values to request new capabilities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a scoping literature review of augmented-reality user interfaces (AR UIs) for first responders in the EMS, firefighting, and law-enforcement domains. Following Kitchenham and Charters and the PICOC framework, the authors searched ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, ProQuest, and Scopus, screened candidate records, and retained 90 papers. They propose a six-facet taxonomy (operating environment, discipline, requirements, display hardware, display context, output channel) and a catalog of 12 interface elements (e.g., edge detection, object highlighting, navigation, alerts, on-demand interfaces, augmented guidance). The review reports publication trends, classifies all 90 papers in facet tables, and identifies gaps such as sparse multimodal feedback and limited cross-discipline designs.

Significance. If the corpus is representative, the review is a useful synthesis and appears to be the first dedicated map of this domain. Its strengths are the explicit PICOC/PRISMA procedure, dual screening and data-extraction, complete citation tables for every facet, and candid statements of limitations. The taxonomy is simple and usable, and the 12-element catalog gives designers a shared vocabulary. However, the significance depends on the representativeness of the 90-paper corpus and on the trustworthiness of the classifications; both are currently in question.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.3, Table 1; §2.6; §5] The central claim that this is the first comprehensive map of AR UIs for first responders is not yet supported by the retrieval strategy. The Population block of Table 1 omits high-frequency domain terms such as 'search and rescue', 'rescue', 'disaster response', 'emergency management', 'paramedic', and standalone 'police'; a paper titled, say, 'Augmented Reality for Urban Search and Rescue' would be retrieved only if it happened to include one of the listed population phrases. Section 2.6 concedes that non-matching articles were excluded, but no backward/forward citation chasing, no saturation check, and no comparison with the prior systematic review [2] is reported. Because the gap analysis (e.g., only 2 haptic and 10 auditory papers in Table 7; few cross-discipline designs in Section 4.2) is derived from this corpus, those gaps may partly reflect search coverage. The authors should either broaden the search (adding terms, reference harvesting, and a comparison against [2]) or temper the comprehensiveness claim to one about the retrieved corpus.
  2. [§2.4, Fig. 1; Abstract] The PRISMA flow and the reported totals are inconsistent. The abstract and Section 2.4 say the keyword search retrieved 1,751 papers; Section 2.4 then says 'Of the initial 1,751 retrieved papers, 1,661 were rejected', which matches the eligibility stage in Figure 1. Figure 1, however, reports 3,440 records screened (after 1,169 duplicates removed) and 1,751 citations sought for retrieval. The reader cannot tell whether 1,751 is the raw retrieval, the post-deduplication count, or the number of full-text reports assessed. Please redraw the flow with consistent stage counts and define each number.
  3. [§3.2, Tables 2–7; Fig. 4] The classification tables are not internally reproducible. Within a single facet, categories are not mutually exclusive: Display Hardware sums to 108 papers, Requirements to 99, Display Context to 118, and Output Modality to 102 against N=90, so a paper can appear in several categories. The text does not state that categories are non-exclusive, nor does it report how overlaps are handled or how disagreements between the two readers were resolved beyond discussion (§2.4–2.5). No inter-rater reliability statistic (e.g., Cohen's kappa) is reported for the classification. Because the taxonomy is the paper's main contribution, the authors should state the exclusivity rules, report agreement coefficients, and provide per-paper facet values in the supplementary material.
  4. [§2.3] The search strategy is not fully replicable. The paper gives the synonym lists in Table 1 and states that the base string 'was adapted for the databases', but it does not report the actual query strings used for ACM, IEEE Xplore, ProQuest, or Scopus, nor the date of the search for each source. Full query strings (with field tags, wildcards, and filters) should be supplied in an appendix or online supplement.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Header] The running header misspells 'Transactions' as 'TRANSACTIOINS'.
  2. [Fig. 4; §3.2.3; Table 4] Figure 4 uses 'Personal Records Data' while the text and Table 4 use 'Patient/Suspect Data'; the terms should be aligned.
  3. [Fig. 4; §3.2.6; Table 7] Figure 4's Output Channel branch lists 'Non-Visual' in addition to 'Visual', but Section 3.2.6 defines only Visual, Auditory, and Haptic and says all included interfaces have visual augmentation; clarify the figure.
  4. [Table 5; Fig. 4] Table 5 labels a category 'HMD (Unspecified)' while Figure 4 says 'Head Mounted'; similarly, Table 6 says 'Spatial' while Figure 4 says 'Spatial Augmentation'. Use consistent facet names.
  5. [§3.3.3] The statement that navigation elements were 'mentioned (103 instances across various disciplines)' uses an undefined counting unit and exceeds the 90-paper corpus; explain how instances are counted.
  6. [Fig. 2] Figure 2 has no visible y-axis label; 'Number of Publications' should appear in the figure itself.
  7. [§2.4] The sentence beginning 'Inclusion criteria we relevance' contains a typo; it should read 'Inclusion criteria were relevance, availability, and language (English)'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the taxonomy and gap analysis are inductive syntheses of the reviewed corpus, and the acknowledged search-coverage limitations are validity concerns rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

This is a scoping literature review, not a derivation from first principles. The central contribution is a six-facet taxonomy (Figure 4) and a catalog of 12 interface elements, both explicitly constructed from the 90 reviewed papers: 'we developed a high-level faceted taxonomy ... based on the current literature as a model for categorization of existing literature' (Section 3.2). Classifying a corpus does not make a prediction that is equivalent to its input in the sense of circularity; the taxonomy is a summary of the corpus rather than an independent claim derived from it. The authors' own prior papers [37,38] are included in the reviewed set and their design concepts appear as categories (e.g., 'On-Demand Interfaces', 'Augmented Enhancement'), but the taxonomy is not used to validate those concepts, and the effectiveness discussion repeatedly notes the lack of direct evidence for them. The self-citation is therefore not load-bearing. The main threats to the paper's 'first ... comprehensive map' claim are search-coverage limitations, which the authors acknowledge in Section 2.6: 'potentially relevant articles that did not match the search string were not included.' A narrow keyword set and the absence of citation chasing could bias gap counts (e.g., haptic and auditory modalities appear undercounted partly because purely non-visual interfaces were excluded by the Section 2.1 inclusion criterion), but these are methodological validity concerns about representativeness, not circular reasoning. No equation, fitted parameter, or definitional identity connects the conclusions back to the inputs in a way that would make the conclusions true by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no numerical free parameters or new physical entities. Its load-bearing assumptions are about literature coverage, the sufficiency of peer-review as a quality filter, the inductive validity of the taxonomy facets, and the inclusion criterion requiring visual augmentation. These are standard domain assumptions for a scoping review, but they are not empirically verified within the paper.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The four databases (ACM, IEEE, ProQuest, Scopus) and the keyword search capture a representative sample of the relevant literature.
    Section 2.2 and 2.3: the completeness of the entire map depends on this coverage.
  • domain assumption Peer-reviewed publication implies a baseline of quality and relevance for inclusion.
    Section 2.1: all 90 papers are included regardless of implementation maturity, so peer-review is the only quality filter.
  • domain assumption The six facets consistently emerge from the literature as the most fundamental high-level distinctions.
    Section 3.2: this is an inductive claim presented without inter-rater agreement or external validation.
  • domain assumption Scoping review methodology (Arksey and O'Malley, Kitchenham and Charters) is appropriate for mapping this domain.
    Section 2.1: the paper relies on these methodological frameworks to define its scope and search process.
  • domain assumption Including papers with visual augmentation, optionally with other modalities, captures the AR UI design space.
    Section 2.1: this inclusion criterion shapes the entire corpus and therefore the taxonomy and gap analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Augmented Reality User Interfaces for First Responders: A Scoping Literature Review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5IQKCANI

@misc{pith2026250609236,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Augmented Reality User Interfaces for First Responders: A Scoping Literature Review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5IQKCANI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09236}
}
read the original abstract

During the past decade, there has been a significant increase in research focused on integrating AR User Interfaces into public safety applications, particularly for first responders in the domains of Emergency Medical Services, Firefighting, and Law Enforcement. This paper presents the results of a scoping review involving the application of AR user interfaces in the public safety domain and applies an established systematic review methodology to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current research landscape, identifying key trends, challenges, and gaps in the literature. This review includes peer-reviewed publications indexed by the major scientific databases up to April 2025. A basic keyword search retrieved 1,751 papers, of which 90 were deemed relevant for this review. An in-depth analysis of the literature allowed the development of a faceted taxonomy that categorizes AR user interfaces for public safety. This classification lays a solid foundation for future research, while also highlighting key design considerations, challenges, and gaps in the literature. This review serves as a valuable resource for researchers and developers, offering insights that can drive further advances in the field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09236 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Annual research output on AR UIs for first responders. Publication [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Geographic distribution of peer-reviewed papers on augmented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Taxonomy of AR UI designs for first responder applications developed as a result of the analysis of the literature covered in this scoping review. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Technologies en- abling situational awareness during disaster response: A systematic review,

    T. Kedia, J. Ratcliff, M. O’Connor, S. Oluic, M. Rose, J. Freeman, and K. Rainwater-Lovett, “Technologies en- abling situational awareness during disaster response: A systematic review,”Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 341–359, 2022

    2022

  2. [1]

    Expanding understanding of response roles: An examination of immediate and first responders in the united states,

    C. Harris, K. McCarthy, E. L. Liu, K. Klein, R. Swienton, P. Prins, and T. Waltz, “Expanding understanding of response roles: An examination of immediate and first responders in the united states,”International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 3, 2018

    2018

  3. [3]

    Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,

    S. C. B. Kitchenham, “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,” Technical report, ver. 2.3 ebse technical report. ebse, Tech. Rep., 2007

    2007

  4. [4]

    Petticrew and H

    M. Petticrew and H. Roberts,Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2008

    2008

  5. [5]

    Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework,

    H. Arksey and L. O’Malley, “Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework,”International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2005

    2005

  6. [6]

    Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions,

    N. Mays, E. Roberts, and J. Popay, “Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions,”BMJ, vol. 323, no. 7312, pp. 765–768, 2001

    2001

  7. [7]

    Guidance for conduct- ing systematic scoping reviews,

    M. D. Peters, C. M. Godfrey, H. Khalil, P. McInerney, D. Parker, and C. Baldini Soares, “Guidance for conduct- ing systematic scoping reviews,”International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 141–146, 2015

    2015

  8. [8]

    Parsifal: Perform systematic literature reviews,

    Parsifal, “Parsifal: Perform systematic literature reviews,” https://parsif.al/, n.d., accessed: 2025-05-30

    2025

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    A 5G-Based eHealth Monitoring and Emergency Response System: Experience and Lessons Learned,

    K. Antevski, L. Girletti, C. J. Bernardos, A. De La Oliva, J. Baranda, and J. Mangues-Bafalluy, “A 5G-Based eHealth Monitoring and Emergency Response System: Experience and Lessons Learned,”IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 131 420– 131 429, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    White paper on adaptive situational awareness enhancing augmented reality interface design on first responders in rescue tasks,

    I. Azpiroz, I. G. Olaizola, X. Oregui, A. F. Garc ´ıa, V . Ruiz, B. Larraga-Garc ´ıa, and ´A. Guti ´errez, “White paper on adaptive situational awareness enhancing augmented reality interface design on first responders in rescue tasks,”Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 18, p. 8282, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Implementing User-Centered Methods and Virtual Reality to Rapidly Prototype Augmented Reality Tools for Firefighters,

    T. Bailie, J. Martin, Z. Aman, R. Brill, and A. Herman, “Implementing User-Centered Methods and Virtual Reality to Rapidly Prototype Augmented Reality Tools for Firefighters,” inFoundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience, D. D. Schmorrow a...

    2016

  4. [12]

    Optical Head- Mounted Displays in Mass Casualty Incidents: Keeping an Eye on Patients and Hazardous Materials,

    H. Berndt, T. Mentler, and M. Herczeg, “Optical Head- Mounted Displays in Mass Casualty Incidents: Keeping an Eye on Patients and Hazardous Materials,”International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–15, Jul. 2015

    2015

  5. [13]

    An embedded deep learning system for augmented reality in firefighting applications,

    M. Bhattarai, A. R. Jensen-Curtis, and M. Martinez-Ramon, “An embedded deep learning system for augmented reality in firefighting applications,” in2020 19th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). Miami, FL, USA: IEEE, Dec. 2020, pp. 1224–1230

    2020

  6. [14]

    Collision Avoidance Head-Up Display: Design Considerations for Emergency Services’ Vehicles,

    K. Bram-Larbi, V . Charissis, S. Khan, R. Lagoo, D. K. Harrison, and D. Drikakis, “Collision Avoidance Head-Up Display: Design Considerations for Emergency Services’ Vehicles,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Con- sumer Electronics (ICCE). Las Vegas, NV , USA: IEEE, Ja...

    2020

  7. [15]

    Using augmented reality to improve dismounted operators’ situation awareness,

    W. L. Brandao and M. S. Pinho, “Using augmented reality to improve dismounted operators’ situation awareness,” in 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). Los Angeles, CA, USA: IEEE, 2017, pp. 297–298

    2017

  8. [16]

    Usability and reliability of smart glasses for secondary triage during mass casualty incidents,

    J. Broach, A. Hart, M. Griswold, J. Lai, E. W. Boyer, A. B. Skolnik, and P. R. Chai, “Usability and reliability of smart glasses for secondary triage during mass casualty incidents,” inProceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Confer- ence on System Sciences (HICSS), 2018...

    2018

  9. [17]

    Mobile incident command dashboard (MIC-D),

    Y . Cai and M. Siegel, “Mobile incident command dashboard (MIC-D),”Electronic Imaging, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 358–1– 358–4, Jan. 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Mobile augmented reality techniques for emer- gency response,

    A. Campos, N. Correia, T. Rom˜ao, I. Nunes, and M. Sim ˜oes- Marques, “Mobile augmented reality techniques for emer- gency response,” inProceedings of the 16th EAI Inter- national Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: IEEE TRANSACTIOINS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRA...

    2019

  11. [19]

    Design of a Mixed Reality System for Simulating Indoor Disaster Rescue,

    Y .-J. Chae, H.-W. Lee, J.-H. Kim, S.-W. Hwang, and Y .-Y . Park, “Design of a Mixed Reality System for Simulating Indoor Disaster Rescue,”Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 4418, Mar. 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Cross-Device Augmented Real- ity Systems for Fire and Rescue based on Thermal Imaging and Live Tracking,

    T. Chalimas and K. Mania, “Cross-Device Augmented Real- ity Systems for Fire and Rescue based on Thermal Imaging and Live Tracking,” in2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). Sydney, Australia: IEEE, Oct. 2023, pp. 50–54

    2023

  13. [21]

    ERWear: Wear- able System Design through the Lens of First Responders,

    E. Chan, Y . Wang, T. Seyed, and F. Maurer, “ERWear: Wear- able System Design through the Lens of First Responders,” inProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces. Niagara Falls Ontario Canada: ACM, Nov. 2016, pp. 489–492

    2016

  14. [22]

    Effective Navigation for an Emergency Response for Firefighters with Wearable Haptic Displays Design,

    Z. Cheng, G. Ren, S. Dong, R. Li, Z. Huo, J. Li, and G. Wang, “Effective Navigation for an Emergency Response for Firefighters with Wearable Haptic Displays Design,” in 2023 IEEE 6th International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII). Sapporo, Japan: IEEE, ...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Augmented reality points of interest for improved first responder situational awareness,

    K. Christaki, D. Tsiakmakis, I. Babic, G. Inglese, K. Kon- stantoudakis, G. Giunta, A. Dimou, O. Balet, and P. Daras, “Augmented reality points of interest for improved first responder situational awareness,” inProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Sy...

    2022

  16. [24]

    Google glass for public safety: leveraging Google Glass for automatic information retrieval and notification by public safety officers in the field,

    M. Christian, A. Depaz, M. Grimm, J. W. Lartigue, R. Sweatland, and C. Talley, “Google glass for public safety: leveraging Google Glass for automatic information retrieval and notification by public safety officers in the field,” inProceedings of the 2014 ACM Southeast Regiona...

    2014

  17. [25]

    Training and supporting first responders by mixed reality environments,

    G. Chroust, S. Sch ¨onhacker, K. Rainer, M. Roth, and P. Ziehesberger, “Training and supporting first responders by mixed reality environments,” inProceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2009, Brisbane, Australia, 2009

    2009

  18. [26]

    AR browser for points of interest in disaster response in UA V imagery,

    D. E. Crowley, R. R. Murphy, A. McNamara, T. D. McLaughlin, and B. A. Duncan, “AR browser for points of interest in disaster response in UA V imagery,” inCHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Toronto Ontario Canada: ACM, Apr. 2014, pp. 2173–2178

    2014

  19. [27]

    Augmenting Situational Awareness for First responders using Social media as a sensor,

    R. Dave, S. K. Boddhu, M. McCartney, and J. West, “Augmenting Situational Awareness for First responders using Social media as a sensor,”IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 133–140, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Augmented reality and training for airway management procedures,

    L. Davis, Y . Ha, S. Frolich, G. Martin, C. Meyer, B. Pettitt, J. Norfleet, K.-C. Lin, and J. P. Rolland, “Augmented reality and training for airway management procedures,” inMedicine Meets Virtual Reality 02/10. IOS Press, 2002, pp. 121–126

  21. [29]

    Underground mine emergency evacuation planning: AR implementation and case study,

    D. C. Demirkan, A. Segal, A. Mallik, S. Duzgun, and A. J. Petruska, “Underground mine emergency evacuation planning: AR implementation and case study,” inProceend- ings of Optical Architectures for Displays and Sensing in Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality (AR, VR, MR), H. ...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Design of Intelligent Firefighter Helmet Based on AR Technology,

    Z. Dianxi, C. Danhongand, and G. Zhen, “Design of Intelligent Firefighter Helmet Based on AR Technology,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 621, no. 1, p. 012176, Jan. 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Viability of Augmented Content for Field Policing,

    H. Engelbrecht and S. G. Lukosch, “Viability of Augmented Content for Field Policing,” in2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). Munich, Germany: IEEE, Oct. 2018, pp. 386–389

    2018

  24. [32]

    Red cross triage app design for augmented real- ity glasses,

    M. del Roc´ıo Fuentes Fern´andez, C. I. T. Bernabe, and R. R. Rodr´ıguez, “Red cross triage app design for augmented real- ity glasses,” inProceedings of the 5th Mexican Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2014, pp. 11–14

    2014

  25. [33]

    Follmann, M

    A. Follmann, M. Ohligs, N. Hochhausen, S. K. Beckers, R. Rossaint, and M. Czaplik, “Technical support by smart glasses during a mass casualty incident: a randomized controlled simulation trial on technically assisted triage and telemedical app use in disaster medicine,”Journal...

    2019

  26. [34]

    Health-5G: A Mixed Reality-Based System for Remote Medical Assistance in Emergency Situations,

    F. M. Garc´ıa, R. Moraleda, S. Schez-Sobrino, D. N. Mon- ekosso, D. Vallejo, and C. Glez-Morcillo, “Health-5G: A Mixed Reality-Based System for Remote Medical Assistance in Emergency Situations,”IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 59 016– 59 032, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Smart helmet: Combining sensors, AI, augmented reality, and personal protection to enhance first responders’ situational awareness,

    A. F. Garc´ıa, X. O. Biain, K. Lingos, K. Konstantoudakis, A. B. Hern ´andez, I. A. Iragorri, and D. Zarpalas, “Smart helmet: Combining sensors, AI, augmented reality, and personal protection to enhance first responders’ situational awareness,”IT Professional, vol. 25, no. 6, ...

    2023

  28. [36]

    Object detection and augmented reality annotations for increased situational awareness in light smoke conditions,

    I. Gkika, D. Pattas, K. Konstantoudakis, and D. Zarpalas, “Object detection and augmented reality annotations for increased situational awareness in light smoke conditions,” inProceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Manag...

    2023

  29. [37]

    Design and Simulation of Next-Generation Augmented Reality User Interfaces in Virtual Reality,

    J. G. Grandi, Z. Cao, M. Ogren, and R. Kopper, “Design and Simulation of Next-Generation Augmented Reality User Interfaces in Virtual Reality,” in2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). Lisbon, Portugal: IEEE, Mar. 2021, pp. 23–29

    2021

  30. [38]

    Simulating Next-Generation User Interfaces for Law Enforcement Traffic Stops,

    ——, “Simulating Next-Generation User Interfaces for Law Enforcement Traffic Stops,” in2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). Atlanta, GA, USA: IEEE, Mar. 2020, pp. 826–827

    2020

  31. [39]

    An Augmented Reality Framework for First Responders: the RESPOND-A project approach,

    H. Arregui, E. Irigoyen, I. Cejudo, S. Simonsen, D. Ribar, M.-A. Kourtis, Y . Spyridis, N. Stathakarou, and M. C. Batistatos, “An Augmented Reality Framework for First Responders: the RESPOND-A project approach,” in2022 Panhellenic Conference on Electronics & Telecommunica- ti...

    2022

  32. [40]

    Augmented reality based criminal investigation system (ARCRIME),

    S. E. I. Haque and S. Saleem, “Augmented reality based criminal investigation system (ARCRIME),” in2020 8th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS). Beirut, Lebanon: IEEE, Jun. 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  33. [41]

    Mixed Reality for Post-Disaster Situational Awareness,

    J. P. Howard II, A. O. Tucker IV , S. A. Bailey, and J. L. Dean, “Mixed Reality for Post-Disaster Situational Awareness,” Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, vol. 35, no. 3, 2020. IEEE TRANSACTIOINS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, VOL. XX, NO. XX, MONTH 20XX 17

    2020

  34. [42]

    Human-in-the-loop robot- augmented intelligent system for emergency reconnaissance,

    D. Hu, S. Li, J. Du, and J. Cai, “Human-in-the-loop robot- augmented intelligent system for emergency reconnaissance,” inComputing in Civil Engineering 2021, 2021, pp. 1409– 1416

    2021

  35. [43]

    Seeing through disaster rubble in 3d with ground-penetrating radar and interactive augmented reality for urban search and rescue,

    D. Hu, L. Chen, J. Du, J. Cai, and S. Li, “Seeing through disaster rubble in 3d with ground-penetrating radar and interactive augmented reality for urban search and rescue,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 36, no. 5, p. 04022021, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Augmented card system based on knowledge for medical emergency assistance,

    J. Ierache, N. Mangiarua, N. Verdicchio, D. Sanz, C. Mon- talvo, F. Petrolo, and S. Igarza, “Augmented card system based on knowledge for medical emergency assistance,” in2016 IEEE Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la In- form´atica y Desarrollos de Investigaci´on (CACIDI). Bu...

    2016

  37. [45]

    Radiological Incident System using Augmented Reality (RISAR),

    M. Ismael, R. McCall, M. Cornil, M. Griffin, and J. Baixauli, “Radiological Incident System using Augmented Reality (RISAR),” in2023 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). Shanghai, China: IEEE, Mar. 2023, pp. 591–592

    2023

  38. [46]

    Com- paring Firefighters’ Perceived Workload Using 2D vs. 3D Building Plans to Support Emergency Response Preplanning in a Simulated Fire Scenario,

    K. A. Kapalo, K. Pfeil, J. Bonnell, and J. LaViola, “Com- paring Firefighters’ Perceived Workload Using 2D vs. 3D Building Plans to Support Emergency Response Preplanning in a Simulated Fire Scenario,” in2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct ...

    2022

  39. [47]

    A real-time wearable AR system for egocentric vision on the edge,

    I. Karakostas, A. Valakou, D. Gavgiotaki, Z. Stefanidi, I. Pastaltzidis, G. Tsipouridis, N. Kilis, K. C. Apostolakis, S. Ntoa, N. Dimitriou, G. Margetis, and D. Tzovaras, “A real-time wearable AR system for egocentric vision on the edge,”Virtual Reality, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 44,...

    2024

  40. [48]

    Guiding Gaze: Comparing Cues for Visual Search,

    B. Kelley, C. Wickens, B. Clegg, A. C. Warden, and F. R. Ortega, “Guiding Gaze: Comparing Cues for Visual Search,” in2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). Orlando, FL, USA: IEEE, Mar. 2024, pp. 1053–1054

    2024

  41. [49]

    Mobile augmented reality in support of building damage and safety assessment,

    W. Kim, N. Kerle, and M. Gerke, “Mobile augmented reality in support of building damage and safety assessment,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 287–298, Feb. 2016

    2016

  42. [50]

    New emergency medicine paradigm via augmented telemedicine,

    G. Kurillo, A. Y . Yang, V . Shia, A. Bair, and R. Bajcsy, “New emergency medicine paradigm via augmented telemedicine,” inVirtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, S. Lackey and R. Shumaker, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016, vol. 9740, pp. 502–511, series Title:...

    2016

  43. [51]

    A fire reconnaissance robot based on slam position, thermal imaging technologies, and ar display,

    S. Li, C. Feng, Y . Niu, L. Shi, Z. Wu, and H. Song, “A fire reconnaissance robot based on slam position, thermal imaging technologies, and ar display,”Sensors, vol. 19, no. 22, p. 5036, 2019

    2019

  44. [52]

    Mobile AR Application for Navigation and Emergency Response,

    N. R. Mannuru, M. Kanumuru, and S. Sharma, “Mobile AR Application for Navigation and Emergency Response,” in 2022 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI). Las Vegas, NV , USA: IEEE, Dec. 2022, pp. 1137–1142

    2022

  45. [53]

    Pathfinding for Disaster Emergency Route Using Sparse A* and Dijkstra Algorithm with Augmented Reality,

    T. Mantoro, Z. Alamsyah, and M. A. Ayu, “Pathfinding for Disaster Emergency Route Using Sparse A* and Dijkstra Algorithm with Augmented Reality,” in2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED). Sukabumi, Indonesia: IEEE, Aug. 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  46. [54]

    Leveraging augmented reality for improved situational awareness during uav-driven search and rescue missions,

    R. Nalamothu, P. Sontha, J. Karravula, and A. Agrawal, “Leveraging augmented reality for improved situational awareness during uav-driven search and rescue missions,” in2024 IEEE International Symposium on Safety Security Rescue Robotics (SSRR). IEEE, 2024, pp. 221–228

    2024

  47. [55]

    User-Centered Design and Evaluation of ARTTS: an Augmented Reality Triage Tool Suite for Mass Casualty Incidents,

    C. R. Nelson, J. L. Gabbard, J. B. Moats, and R. K. Mehta, “User-Centered Design and Evaluation of ARTTS: an Augmented Reality Triage Tool Suite for Mass Casualty Incidents,” in2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). Singapore, Singapore: IEEE...

    2022

  48. [56]

    Supporting first responder in-field communication and navigation using head- mounted displays,

    F. B. M. Newaz, A. W. Eide, and A. Pultier, “Supporting first responder in-field communication and navigation using head- mounted displays,” inProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), Kristiansand, Nor...

    2015

  49. [57]

    A Mixed-Methods Approach for the Evaluation of Situational Awareness and User Experience with Augmented Reality Technologies,

    S. Ntoa, G. Margetis, A. Valakou, F. Makri, N. Dimitriou, I. Karakostas, G. Kokkinis, K. C. Apostolakis, D. Tzovaras, and C. Stephanidis, “A Mixed-Methods Approach for the Evaluation of Situational Awareness and User Experience with Augmented Reality Technologies,” inAugmented...

    2024

  50. [58]

    An augmented reality application to support deployed emergency teams,

    I. L. Nunes, R. Lucas, M. Sim ˜oes-Marques, and N. Correia, “An augmented reality application to support deployed emergency teams,” inProceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) Volume V: Human Simulation and Virtual Environments, Wo...

    2018

  51. [59]

    Augmented Reality in Support of Disaster Response,

    I. L. Nunes, R. Lucas, M. Sim ˜oes-Marques, and N. Correia, “Augmented Reality in Support of Disaster Response,” in Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction, I. L. Nunes, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, vol. 592, pp. 155–167, series Title: Advances ...

    2018

  52. [60]

    Augmented reality technology to facilitate proficiency in emergency medical procedures,

    L. O’Connor, S. Zamani, L. Porter, N. McGeorge, S. Latiff, T. Boardman, M. Loconte, M. Weiner, E. McGarry, F. Pina, J. A. Hermaan, A. Milsten, M. Reznek, and J. Broach, “Augmented reality technology to facilitate proficiency in emergency medical procedures,” inProceedings of t...

    2023

  53. [61]

    A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Aug- mented Reality Just-in-Time Guidance for the Performance of Rugged Field Procedures,

    L. O’Connor, S. Zamani, X. Ding, N. McGeorge, S. Latiff, C. Liu, J. Acevedo Herman, M. LoConte, A. Milsten, M. Weiner, T. Boardman, M. Reznek, M. Hall, and J. P. Broach, “A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Aug- mented Reality Just-in-Time Guidance for the Performance of Ru...

    2024

  54. [62]

    Augmented reality interface for adverse-visibility conditions validated by first responders in rescue training scenarios,

    X. Oregui, A. Fern ´andez Garc´ıa, I. Azpiroz, B. Larraga- Garc´ıa, V . Ruiz, I. Garc ´ıa Olaizola, and ´A. Guti ´errez, “Augmented reality interface for adverse-visibility conditions validated by first responders in rescue training scenarios,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 18, p....

    2024

  55. [63]

    An augmented reality system for health care provision via telem- atics support,

    S. Pavlopoulos, S. Dembeyiotis, and D. Koutsouris, “An augmented reality system for health care provision via telem- atics support,” inTechnology and Informatics: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, ser. Studies in Health Technology IEEE TRANSACTIOINS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER...

    1997

  56. [64]

    A robotic augmented reality virtual window for law enforcement operations,

    N. Phillips, B. Kruse, F. A. Khan, J. E. Swan II, and C. L. Bethel, “A robotic augmented reality virtual window for law enforcement operations,” inVirtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Design and Interaction: 12th International Conference, VAMR 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd H...

    2020

  57. [65]

    Next generation emergency management common operating picture software/systems (COPSS),

    R. E. Balfour, “Next generation emergency management common operating picture software/systems (COPSS),” in 2012 IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technol- ogy Conference (LISAT). Farmingdale, NY , USA: IEEE, May 2012, pp. 1–6

    2012

  58. [66]

    Simrad. nbc–simulation and information system for rescue units at cbrn disasters,

    K. Rainer, N. Sturm, S. Sch ¨onhacker, and G. Chroust, “Simrad. nbc–simulation and information system for rescue units at cbrn disasters,” inIntelligent Distributed Computing III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Intelligent Distributed Computing–IDC 2009, Ayi...

    2009

  59. [67]

    CPR Emergency Assistance Through Mixed Reality Com- munication,

    M. Rebol, A. Steinmaurer, F. Gamillscheg, K. Pietroszek, C. G¨utl, C. Ranniger, C. Hood, A. Rutenberg, and N. Sikka, “CPR Emergency Assistance Through Mixed Reality Com- munication,” inAugmented Intelligence and Intelligent Tutoring Systems, C. Frasson, P. Mylonas, and C. Trou...

    2023

  60. [68]

    Evaluation of an augmented reality platform for austere surgical telementoring: a ran- domized controlled crossover study in cricothyroidotomies,

    E. Rojas-Mu˜noz, C. Lin, N. Sanchez-Tamayo, M. E. Cabrera, D. Andersen, V . Popescu, J. A. Barragan, B. Zarzaur, P. Mur- phy, K. Anderson, T. Douglas, C. Griffis, J. McKee, A. W. Kirkpatrick, and J. P. Wachs, “Evaluation of an augmented reality platform for austere surgical te...

    2020

  61. [69]

    Augmented reality for real-time decision-making in flood emergencies,

    I. Safranoglou, A. Stavroulakis, M. Ebel, J. Pottebaum, G. Lamprinakis, D. Dimelli, and K. Mania, “Augmented reality for real-time decision-making in flood emergencies,” in2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 2024, pp. 110–116

    2024

  62. [70]

    Single-handed gesture uav control and video feed ar visualization for first responders,

    D. Sainidis, D. Tsiakmakis, K. Konstantoudakis, G. Alba- nis, A. Dimou, and P. Daras, “Single-handed gesture uav control and video feed ar visualization for first responders,” inProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Man...

    2021

  63. [71]

    AR Crew Rescue Assistant and AR Passenger Assistant Application for emergency scenarios on large passenger ships,

    O. Sampson, S. Bolierakis, M. Krommyda, L. Karagianidis, and A. Amditis, “AR Crew Rescue Assistant and AR Passenger Assistant Application for emergency scenarios on large passenger ships,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST). Kaohsiung,...

    2022

  64. [72]

    Head-Worn Displays for Emergency Medical Services Staff: Properties of Prehospital Work, Use Cases, and Design Considerations,

    P. Schlosser, B. Matthews, I. Salisbury, P. Sanderson, and S. Hayes, “Head-Worn Displays for Emergency Medical Services Staff: Properties of Prehospital Work, Use Cases, and Design Considerations,” inProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems....

    2021

  65. [73]

    Effects of augmented reality-based remote mentoring on task performance and communication: A simulation study in the context of emergency medical services,

    P. D. Schlosser, B. Matthews, P. M. Sanderson, A. Donohue, and S. Hayes, “Effects of augmented reality-based remote mentoring on task performance and communication: A simulation study in the context of emergency medical services,”Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. ...

    2024

  66. [74]

    3d building reconstruction and thermal mapping in fire brigade operations,

    C. Sch¨onauer, E. V onach, G. Gerstweiler, and H. Kaufmann, “3d building reconstruction and thermal mapping in fire brigade operations,” in2013 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), 2013

    2013

  67. [75]

    Training emergency responders through augmented reality mobile interfaces,

    M. Sebillo, G. Vitiello, L. Paolino, and A. Ginige, “Training emergency responders through augmented reality mobile interfaces,”Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 75, no. 16, pp. 9609–9622, Aug. 2016

    2016

  68. [76]

    Situational Awareness-based Augmented Reality Instructional (ARI) Module for Building Evacuation,

    S. Sharma, J. Stigall, and S. T. Bodempudi, “Situational Awareness-based Augmented Reality Instructional (ARI) Module for Building Evacuation,” in2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). Atlanta, GA, USA: IEEE, Mar. 2020, pp. 70–78

    2020

  69. [77]

    SidebARs: improving awareness of off-screen elements in mobile augmented reality,

    T. Siu and V . Herskovic, “SidebARs: improving awareness of off-screen elements in mobile augmented reality,” in Proceedings of the 2013 Chilean Conference on Human - Computer Interaction. Temuco Chile: ACM, Nov. 2013, pp. 36–41

    2013

  70. [78]

    Real-time adaptation of context-aware intelligent user in- terfaces, for enhanced situational awareness,

    Z. Stefanidi, G. Margetis, S. Ntoa, and G. Papagiannakis, “Real-time adaptation of context-aware intelligent user in- terfaces, for enhanced situational awareness,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 23 367–23 393, 2022

    2022

  71. [79]

    The RoboCup-Rescue project: a robotic approach to the disaster mitigation problem,

    S. Tadokoro, H. Kitano, T. Takahashi, I. Noda, H. Mat- subara, A. Shinjoh, T. Koto, I. Takeuchi, H. Takahashi, F. Matsuno, M. Hatayama, J. Nobe, and S. Shimada, “The RoboCup-Rescue project: a robotic approach to the disaster mitigation problem,” inProceedings 2000 ICRA. Millen...

    2000

  72. [80]

    CELIDON: Support- ing First Responders through 3D AOA-based UWB Ad-Hoc Localization,

    J. Tiemann, O. Fuhr, and C. Wietfeld, “CELIDON: Support- ing First Responders through 3D AOA-based UWB Ad-Hoc Localization,” in2020 16th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communi- cations (WiMob). Thessaloniki, Greece: IEEE, Oct. 2020, pp. 20–25

    2020

  73. [81]

    A communication and multi-sensor solution to support dynamic generation of a situational picture,

    M. Umlauft, C. Raffelsberger, A. Kercek, A. Almer, T. Schn- abel, P. Luley, and S. Ladstaetter, “A communication and multi-sensor solution to support dynamic generation of a situational picture,” in2016 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies...

    2016

  74. [82]

    A Mixed Reality Supervision and Telepresence Interface for Outdoor Field Robotics,

    M. Walker, Z. Chen, M. Whitlock, D. Blair, D. A. Szafir, C. Heckman, and D. Szafir, “A Mixed Reality Supervision and Telepresence Interface for Outdoor Field Robotics,” in2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Prague, Czech Republic: I...

    2021

  75. [83]

    Person-of-interest detection system using cloud-supported computerized-eyewear,

    X. Wang, X. Zhao, V . Prakash, Z. Gao, T. Feng, O. Gnawali, and W. Shi, “Person-of-interest detection system using cloud-supported computerized-eyewear,” in2013 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST). Waltham, MA, USA: IEEE, Nov. 2013, pp. IE...

    2013

  76. [84]

    Method and application of information sharing throughout the emergency rescue process based on 5G and AR wearable devices,

    M. Wang, H. Ji, M. Jia, Z. Sun, J. Gu, and H. Ren, “Method and application of information sharing throughout the emergency rescue process based on 5G and AR wearable devices,”Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 6353, Apr. 2023

    2023

  77. [85]

    Augmented Reality Farm MAPPER Develop- ment: Lessons Learned from an App Designed to Improve Rural Emergency Response,

    B. Weichelt, A. Yoder, C. Bendixsen, M. Pilz, G. Minor, and M. Keifer, “Augmented Reality Farm MAPPER Develop- ment: Lessons Learned from an App Designed to Improve Rural Emergency Response,”Journal of Agromedicine, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 284–296, Jul. 2018

    2018

  78. [86]

    Designing for Mobile and Immersive Visual Analytics in the Field,

    M. Whitlock, K. Wu, and D. Szafir, “Designing for Mobile and Immersive Visual Analytics in the Field,” Aug. 2019, arXiv:1908.00680 [cs]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Ajna: A wearable shared perception system for extreme sensemaking,

    M. Wilchek, K. Luther, and F. A. Batarseh, “Ajna: A wearable shared perception system for extreme sensemaking,” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2025

    2025

  80. [88]

    Ex- ploring the Design Space of Optical See-through AR Head- Mounted Displays to Support First Responders in the Field,

    K. Zhang, B. R. Cochran, R. Chen, L. Hartung, B. Sprecher, R. Tredinnick, K. Ponto, S. Banerjee, and Y . Zhao, “Ex- ploring the Design Space of Optical See-through AR Head- Mounted Displays to Support First Responders in the Field,” inProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human...

    2024

  81. [89]

    A Comparative Study of Rendering Devices for Safety-Critical Applications in Operative Control Rooms,

    S. M. U. Arif, P. Mazumdar, and F. Battisti, “A Comparative Study of Rendering Devices for Safety-Critical Applications in Operative Control Rooms,” in2019 11th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA). Dubrovnik, Croatia: IEEE, Sep. 2019, pp. 282–287

    2019

  82. [90]

    The what, why and how of achieving urban telepresence,

    R. E. Balfour and B. P. Donnelly, “The what, why and how of achieving urban telepresence,” in2013 IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT). Farmingdale, NY , USA: IEEE, May 2013, pp. 1–6

    2013

  83. [91]

    The MagicBook revisited,

    G. Lugtenberg, K. Mori, Y . Matoba, T. Teo, and M. Billinghurst, “The MagicBook revisited,” in2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). Sydney, Australia: IEEE, Oct. 2023, pp. 801–806

    2023

  84. [92]

    Using AR to support cross-organisational collaboration in dynamic tasks,

    S. Nilsson, B. Johansson, and A. Jonsson, “Using AR to support cross-organisational collaboration in dynamic tasks,” in2009 8th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. Orlando, FL, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2009, pp. 3–12

    2009

  85. [93]

    Augmented reality training, command and control framework for first responders,

    O. Peretti, Y . Spyridis, A. Sesis, G. Efstathopoulos, A. Lytos, T. Lagkas, and P. Sarigiannidis, “Augmented reality training, command and control framework for first responders,” in 2022 7th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Soci...

    2022

  86. [94]

    A ‘mixed reality’ simulator concept for future Medical Emergency Response Team training,

    R. J. Stone, R. Guest, P. Mahoney, D. Lamb, and C. Gibson, “A ‘mixed reality’ simulator concept for future Medical Emergency Response Team training,”Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 280–287, Aug. 2017

    2017

  87. [95]

    Juxtopia® cammrad prepare: A wearable ai-ar platform for clinical training emergency first response teams,

    J. T. Doswell, J. Jolmson, B. Brockingon, A. Mosby, S. Salaam, and A. Chinery, “Juxtopia® cammrad prepare: A wearable ai-ar platform for clinical training emergency first response teams,” in2020 22nd Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR). IEEE, 2020, pp. 164–168

    2020

  88. [96]

    Prehospital pediatric emergency training using augmented reality simulation: A prospective, mixed methods study,

    N. Friedman, M. Zuniga-Hernandez, J. Titzler, M. Y . Suen, E. Wang, O. Rosales, J. Graham, P. D’Souza, M. Menendez, and T. J. Caruso, “Prehospital pediatric emergency training using augmented reality simulation: A prospective, mixed methods study,”Prehospital Emergency Care, v...

    2024

  89. [97]

    A virtual and augmented reality platform for the training of first responders of the ambulance bus,

    G. Koutitas, K. S. Smith, G. Lawrence, V . Metsis, C. Stam- per, M. Trahan, and T. Lehr, “A virtual and augmented reality platform for the training of first responders of the ambulance bus,” inProceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Relat...

    2019

  90. [98]

    A cloud-based fire safety system for emergency responders and civic community,

    S. Majumdar and S. Kirkley, “A cloud-based fire safety system for emergency responders and civic community,” in2023 IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT). Old Westbury, NY , USA: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  91. [99]

    Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems,

    M. R. Endsley, “Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems,”Human Factors, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 32–64, 1995

    1995

  92. [100]

    Effects of mobile map orientation and tactile feedback on navigation speed and situation awareness,

    N. J. J. M. Smets, G. M. Te Brake, M. A. Neerincx, and J. Lindenberg, “Effects of mobile map orientation and tactile feedback on navigation speed and situation awareness,” in Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and...

    2008

  93. [101]

    Head-mounted display efficacy study to aid first responder indoor navigation,

    J. Wilson and P. Wright, “Head-mounted display efficacy study to aid first responder indoor navigation,”Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 675–688, Mar. 2009

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.