REVIEW 1 cited by
ALCOP: Automatic Load-Compute Pipelining in Deep Learning Compiler for AI-GPUs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Pipelining between data loading and computation is a critical tensor program optimization for GPUs. In order to unleash the high performance of latest GPUs, we must perform a synergetic optimization of multi-stage pipelining across the multi-level buffer hierarchy of GPU. Existing frameworks rely on hand-written libraries such as cuBLAS to perform pipelining optimization, which is inextensible to new operators and un-composable with prior tensor compiler optimizations. This paper presents ALCOP, the first framework that is compiler-native and fully supports multi-stage multi-level pipelining. ALCOP overcomes three critical obstacles in generating code for pipelining: detection of pipelining-applicable buffers, program transformation for multi-level multi-stage pipelining, and efficient schedule parameter search by incorporating static analysis. Experiments show that ALCOP can generate programs with 1.23x speedup on average (up to 1.73x) over vanilla TVM. On end-to-end models, ALCOP can improve upon TVM by up to 1.18x, and XLA by up to 1.64x. Besides, our performance model significantly improves the efficiency of the schedule tuning process and can find schedules with 99% of the performance given by exhaustive search while costing 40x fewer trials.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
KPerfIR: Towards an Open and Compiler-centric Ecosystem for GPU Kernel Performance Tooling on Modern AI Workloads
KPerfIR is a compiler-centric profiling infrastructure for Triton, demonstrated by a region-based timing tool that improved Triton's FlashAttention-3 by 24.1%.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.