Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Pulse duration dependence of material response in ultrafast laser-induced surface-penetrating nanovoids in fused silica

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single 2 ps Bessel pulse can open a 150-nm-wide, 13,000:1-aspect-ratio nanovoid through 2-mm fused silica; pulse duration controls opposite surface and bulk responses via dispersion and plasma defocusing.

desk verdict Solid pulse-duration study undercut by an unproven record aspect-ratio claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17385 v1 pith:5JHQWVQH submitted 2025-05-23 physics.optics

Guodong Zhang , Na Li , Hao Zhang , Huaiyi Wang , Jinlong Xu , Jiang Wang , Jing Wang , Dandan Hui
show 2 more authors
Yuxi Fu Guanghua Cheng
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords ultrafastlaserprocessingBesselbeamfusedsilicananovoidfabricationhigh-aspect-rationanostructuringpulsedurationdependencenonlinearpropagationplasmadefocusing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a single ultrafast Bessel pulse can produce a continuous surface-penetrating nanovoid through a 2-mm-thick fused silica sample, with an aspect ratio exceeding 13,000:1. It finds that material response depends strongly on pulse duration and, surprisingly, in opposite directions at the surface and in the bulk: from 0.2 ps to 9.0 ps, surface ablation weakens monotonically, while internal void diameter first grows then shrinks, and at 0.2 ps no internal void forms at all. The authors argue that this dichotomy follows from where energy gets deposited: group-velocity dispersion and plasma defocusing suppress energy delivery deep inside for short pulses but create a sharp energy-enhancement layer at the front surface. A 400-nm polymer coating moves that surface enhancement away, suppresses sputtering at the void opening, and enables the 2 ps fabrication of the ultrahigh-aspect-ratio voids. If correct, single-shot Bessel writing could serve as a practical way to make nanoscale through-holes, volume gratings, and stealth-dicing cuts in transparent materials.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the single-shot ultrafast Bessel beam, an axicon-generated non-diffracting beam with a roughly 1.1-μm central lobe and a focal depth of hundreds of micrometers to millimeters, whose nonlinear propagation in fused silica is modeled by a system that includes multiphoton ionization, avalanche ionization, free-carrier absorption, group-velocity dispersion, the Kerr effect, and plasma defocusing. That model supplies the paper's central quantitative contrast: the deposited energy density along the beam axis, which falls below the assumed nanovoid threshold, between about 5×$10^{9}$ and 9×$10^{9}$ J/$m^{3}$, for 0.2 ps pulses in the bulk but rises sharply in a roughly 100-nm surface layer; at 2 ps the bulk value crosses threshold while the surface enhancement is weaker. The sharp surface-layer enhancement and its spatial hysteresis under dispersion and defocusing are what the authors use to explain the depth-dependent morphology.

What would settle it

Measure the deposited energy density or the void-formation threshold in fused silica under 0.2 ps and 2 ps Bessel irradiation using time-resolved phase imaging or calibrated pump-probe diagnostics; the mechanism predicts that the 0.2 ps bulk value stays below threshold while the near-surface value exceeds it, and that the 2 ps bulk value crosses threshold, so if the measured ordering differs, the proposed explanation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the pulse duration of a single-shot ultrafast Bessel beam controls whether fused silica responds as a surface-ablation event or as an in-bulk cavitation event, and that the two responses follow opposite trends because energy deposition is governed by nonlinear propagation effects, chiefly group-velocity dispersion and plasma defocusing, rather than by pulse energy alone. At 0.2 ps the beam deposits only about 5×$10^{9}$ J/$m^{3}$ deep inside silica, below the void-formation threshold, while depositing much more in a roughly 100-nm surface layer, so the surface abrades violently but no internal nanovoid appears. At 2 ps the deep deposition reaches about 9×$10^{9}$ J/$m^{3}$, enough, the authors estimate, to heat the focal region to roughly 4500 K, so a continuous void forms and, with a polymer film preventing surface sputtering, extends as a 150-nm-diameter channel through the full 2-mm sample, an aspect ratio exceeding 13,000:1.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the simulation's material parameters, taken from an earlier study, and on the assumption that the nanovoid threshold lies between the calculated 5×$10^{9}$ J/$m^{3}$ (0.2 ps) and 9×$10^{9}$ J/$m^{3}$ (2 ps) bulk deposited-energy densities; if either is wrong, the explanation of the surface/bulk pulse-duration dichotomy fails even though the fabricated nanovoids remain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single 2 ps, 10 μJ Bessel pulse can write a continuous 150-nm-diameter nanovoid through 2 mm of fused silica, so through-glass channels can in principle be made in one shot without scanning.
  • Pulse duration is a control knob with opposite effects on surface and bulk: shortening pulses does not always promote internal void formation, so processing recipes must be chosen by depth target.
  • Coating the entrance surface with a low-bandgap polymer shifts the energy-enhancement layer and suppresses sputtering at the nanovoid opening, yielding regular donut-shaped openings suitable for arrays and volume gratings.
  • The 13,000:1 aspect-ratio nanovoid array diffracts visible light and acts as a volume grating, pointing toward optical devices and stealth dicing applications.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension suggested by the threshold picture is to map the void-formation boundary in the pulse-duration versus pulse-energy plane and compare it with the model's predicted 5×10^9 to 9×10^9 J/m^3 band; the model would predict a sharp onset of bulk voiding as the deposited energy crosses that band.
  • The polymer-coating trick suggests a general design rule: any low-threshold, low-melting coating that absorbs the surface-enhanced layer should regularize nanovoid openings, so other coatings or thin metal films might be tested to produce different opening geometries.
  • The same nonlinear propagation logic implies that for thicker samples or different focusing geometries, dispersion and plasma defocusing will set a finite pulse-duration window for continuous voids, and the 0.2 ps failure warns that shorter is not automatically better for deep writing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental and numerical study of single-shot ultrafast Bessel beam processing of fused silica, focusing on how pulse duration (0.2–9 ps) affects material response at the front surface versus deep in the bulk. The authors observe that, for in-bulk irradiation, 0.2 ps pulses produce only Type I index modification while longer pulses create nanovoids, with the largest void at ~1.5 ps; for surface irradiation, 0.2 ps pulses produce a 35-μm-long surface-penetrating void despite no bulk void, and the surface ejection diameter decreases monotonically with pulse duration. A nonlinear propagation simulation is used to attribute the dichotomy to group velocity dispersion and plasma defocusing, which suppress energy deposition for short pulses in the bulk but enhance it near the surface. By coating the surface with a PMMA film, the surface response is altered and sputtering is suppressed, enabling fabrication of an array of nanovoids on a 2-mm-thick sample with a reported aspect ratio exceeding 13000:1. The paper includes SEM and PCM characterization of the fabricated structures and discusses possible applications in stealth dicing and microfluidics.

Significance. If the claims hold, the demonstration of surface-penetrating nanovoids with an aspect ratio >13000:1 in a 2-mm-thick fused silica sample would be a notable advance in ultrafast laser processing, and the pulse-duration-dependent surface/bulk dichotomy is an interesting physical effect with potential technological relevance. The paper provides qualitative experimental evidence for these trends and a plausible simulation-based mechanism. However, the quantitative claims—especially the record aspect ratio and the mechanistic threshold argument—rest on incomplete evidence: the void length is inferred rather than directly measured, the simulation parameters are referenced rather than stated, and the experimental trends lack repeat statistics. The paper is therefore not yet at the standard required for a record claim or a fully supported mechanistic conclusion, but the central ideas are defensible and the missing evidence appears obtainable within a reasonable revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section e / Fig. 7] The claim of a 'record aspect ratio of 13,000:1' is not directly supported by the presented evidence. The depth is inferred from the 2-mm sample thickness, not measured along the void. The longitudinal SEM cross-section in Fig. 7(b) does not show a continuous channel through the full thickness, and no rear-surface exit or multi-depth cross-sections are shown. Because a cleavage crack can be guided by a void or a series of disconnected voids, the white-light diffraction and local SEM images do not alone establish a continuous through-thickness channel. The authors should provide either a full-length longitudinal SEM image with scale bar, imaging at several depths, or another unambiguous demonstration of continuity (e.g., rear-surface opening, side-polish series). Without this, the 13000:1 aspect ratio and the associated record claim are not verified.
  2. [Section c] The nonlinear propagation simulation is not sufficiently specified to support the quantitative threshold argument. The material parameters are described only as 'similar to Ref. 26[28-30]' without listing the actual values used (e.g., band gap, nonlinear refractive index, multiphoton and avalanche coefficients, free-carrier absorption cross-section, GVD coefficient). The claim that a deposited energy density between the 0.2 ps case (~5×10^9 J/m^3) and the 2.0 ps case (~9×10^9 J/m^3) controls nanovoid formation is an inferred threshold that is not independently calibrated. Moreover, the simulation is performed for the 1° axicon/45× telescope configuration with a ~300-μm nondiffracting zone, whereas the record fabrication uses the 5° axicon/8.75× telescope with a >2-mm zone. The authors should state the parameters, justify the threshold, and ideally show that the same mechanism holds for the record configuration, or at least discuss the scaling.
  3. [Section 3a / Fig. 2; Section 3b / Fig. 4] The quantitative trends in void diameter and ejection diameter are presented without error bars, number of repeats, or measures of shot-to-shot variability. For example, Fig. 2(b) reports void diameters at different pulse durations, and Fig. 4(a) gives ejection diameters from 3.3 μm to 0.9 μm, but it is unclear how many laser shots were characterized and what the scatter is. If these trends are not robust across repeated measurements, the central claim of opposite pulse-duration dependence on surface versus bulk is weakened. Please add repeat statistics or at least representative images from multiple shots.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2] The laser system is stated as tunable from 0.29 ps to 10.0 ps, but the experiments use pulse durations starting at 0.2 ps; please clarify the actual available pulse duration range and the values used.
  2. [Data availability] The Data availability statement reads 'Data underlying the results presented in this paper are available in.' and is incomplete; please complete the statement or indicate that data are available upon request.
  3. [References] There are formatting inconsistencies in the reference list (e.g., Ref. 24 and Ref. 26 are the same paper in different forms; Ref. 22 lacks author names; Ref. 28 is listed as 'to be published'). Please unify and complete the references.
  4. [Section 3d] The melting point of PMMA is given as '~180 K', which appears to be a typo (likely ~180 °C or ~453 K); please correct.
  5. [General] The manuscript uses several self-citations (Refs. 10, 14, 24, 26, 32) for central concepts; while this is not problematic per se, the relevant parameter values should be stated in this paper rather than only in the cited works.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported experimental trends and fabrication observations are self-contained, while the simulation is a forward model not fitted to the outcomes it explains; the main caveats are evidentiary completeness issues rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

The central experimental findings—pulse-duration-dependent modification inside fused silica, the surface/bulk dichotomy, PMMA modulation, and the fabrication of nanovoid arrays—are independent measurements and do not rely on the simulation for their validity. The nonlinear-propagation model in Section c is a forward calculation: it takes standard physical processes (multiphoton/avalanche ionization, free-carrier absorption, GVD, Kerr effect, plasma defocusing) and computes energy deposition, with parameters taken from prior work rather than fitted to the observed void/no-void boundary. The threshold interpretation between ~5e9 J/m3 and ~9e9 J/m3 is post hoc but is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no equation in the paper reduces by construction to its own input. Some self-citations exist (Refs. 24/26, 28, 32), and Ref. 28 is a to-be-published coauthored source used for material parameters; this weakens independent verifiability of the quantitative mechanism but does not make the argument circular. The 13,000:1 aspect ratio in Section e is inferred by taking the void depth to be the full 2-mm sample thickness ('Considering that the depth of the nanovoids reaches 2 mm'), which is a measurement-support concern rather than a definitional equivalence in the derivation chain. The incomplete data-availability statement ('Data underlying the results presented in this paper are available in.') is also a completeness issue, not circularity. Overall, no load-bearing derivation reduces to its own inputs, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mechanistic claim depends on a borrowed nonlinear propagation model and an uncalibrated energy-density threshold; the experimental fabrication itself stands independently of that model.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Nonlinear propagation model with multiphoton ionization, avalanche ionization, free-carrier absorption, GVD, Kerr effect and plasma defocusing captures the relevant energy deposition.
    Invoked in Section c to compute fluence, electron density and deposited energy; parameter values are not stated, only referenced to Refs. 24-26.
  • domain assumption Bessel beam propagation in air is free of dispersion and nonlinear effects.
    Stated in Section c; any air nonlinearity or dispersion would change the pulse reaching the sample.
  • domain assumption A critical deposited energy density between the calculated 0.2 ps and 2.0 ps values determines whether a nanovoid forms.
    Used in Sections c and e to explain the absence of nanovoids at 0.2 ps; the threshold is not measured or calibrated independently.
  • ad hoc to paper The PMMA film shifts the surface enhancement of energy deposition from the silica surface layer to the film.
    Proposed in Section d to explain the modulated surface response; no direct measurement of energy deposition inside the coated sample is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pulse duration dependence of material response in ultrafast laser-induced surface-penetrating nanovoids in fused silica." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5JHQWVQH

@misc{pith2026250517385,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pulse duration dependence of material response in ultrafast laser-induced surface-penetrating nanovoids in fused silica},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5JHQWVQH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17385}
}
read the original abstract

The focused ultrafast laser, with its ability to initiate nonlinear absorption in transparent materials, has emerged as one of the most effective approaches for micro-nano processing. In this study, we carried out research on the processing of high-aspect-ratio nanovoids on fused silica by using the single-pulse ultrafast Bessel beam. The thermodynamic response behaviors of the materials on surface and deep inside are found to exhibit pronounced disparities with the variation in laser pulse duration. As the pulse duration increases from 0.2 ps to 9.0 ps, the intensity of material ablation on silica surface exhibits a gradually decreasing trend, while for the void formation deep inside silica, the void diameter exhibits a trend of initial increase followed by decrease. In particular, no nanovoids are even induced deep inside when the pulse duration is 0.2 ps. The mechanism causing such differences is discussed and considered to be related to the peak intensity, group velocity dispersion, and plasma defocusing. By covering a polymer film on silica surface to influence the energy deposition, the thermomechanical response behaviors of the materials to laser pulse duration are modulated, and the material sputtering on nanovoid opening is suppressed. On this basis, surface-penetrating nanovoid arrays are fabricated on a 2-mm-thick silica sample using 2 ps Bessel beam. Given the nanovoid diameter of approximately 150 nm, the aspect ratio of the nanovoids on fused silica sample exceeds 13000:1. This outcome creates significant possibilities for the stealth dicing and processing of 3D photonic crystals, optical integrated devices, and nanofluidics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Advances in ultrafast laser structuring of materials at the nanoscale,

    R. Stoian and J.-P. Colombier, "Advances in ultrafast laser structuring of materials at the nanoscale," Nanophotonics 9, 4665-4688 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Super-stealth dicing of transparent solids with nanometric precision,

    Z.-Z. Li, et al., "Super-stealth dicing of transparent solids with nanometric precision," Nature Photonics 18, 799-808 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Enhanced ablation efficiency for silicon by femtosecond laser microprocessing with GHz bursts in MHz bursts(BiBurst),

    F. Caballero-Lucas, et al., "Enhanced ablation efficiency for silicon by femtosecond laser microprocessing with GHz bursts in MHz bursts(BiBurst)," International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing 4(2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Unlocking high photosensitivity direct laser writing and observing atomic clustering in glass,

    W. Zheng, et al., "Unlocking high photosensitivity direct laser writing and observing atomic clustering in glass," Nature Communications 15, 8366 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Focal volume optics for composite structuring in transparent solids,

    Z. Bo, et al., "Focal volume optics for composite structuring in transparent solids," International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing 7, 015002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Self-propelled Leidenfrost droplets on femtosecond-laser-induced surface with periodic hydrophobicity gradient,

    B. Li, et al., "Self-propelled Leidenfrost droplets on femtosecond-laser-induced surface with periodic hydrophobicity gradient," International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing 6(2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Reversible 3D laser printing of perovskite quantum dots inside a transparent medium,

    X. Huang, et al., "Reversible 3D laser printing of perovskite quantum dots inside a transparent medium," Nature Photonics 14, 82-88 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Near-Field Mediated 40 nm In-Volume Glass Fabrication by Femtosecond Laser,

    Z. Yan, et al., "Near-Field Mediated 40 nm In-Volume Glass Fabrication by Femtosecond Laser," Advanced Optical Materials 10, 2101676 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Laser nano-filament explosion for enabling open-grating sensing in optical fibre,

    K. Mahmoud Aghdami, et al., "Laser nano-filament explosion for enabling open-grating sensing in optical fibre," Nature Communications 12, 6344 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Efficient point-by-point Bragg gratings fabricated in embedded laser-written silica waveguides using ultrafast Bessel beams,

    G. Zhang, et al., "Efficient point-by-point Bragg gratings fabricated in embedded laser-written silica waveguides using ultrafast Bessel beams," Optics Letters 43, 2161-2164 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Three-dimensional femtosecond laser nanolithography of crystals,

    A. Rodenas, et al., "Three-dimensional femtosecond laser nanolithography of crystals," Nature Photonics 13, 105-109 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Ultrafast laser manufacturing of nanofluidic systems,

    F. Sima and K. Sugioka, "Ultrafast laser manufacturing of nanofluidic systems," Nanophotonics 10, 2389-2406 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Development of a 3D ultrafast laser written near-infrared spectro-interferometer,

    G. Martin, et al., "Development of a 3D ultrafast laser written near-infrared spectro-interferometer," Optics Letters 48, 2253- 2256 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Ultrashort Bessel beam photoinscription of Bragg grating waveguides and their application as temperature sensors,

    G. Zhang, et al., "Ultrashort Bessel beam photoinscription of Bragg grating waveguides and their application as temperature sensors," Photon. Res. 7, 2327-9125 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Laser‐induced breakdown by impact ionization in SiO2 with pulse widths from 7 ns to 150 fs,

    D. Du, et al., "Laser‐induced breakdown by impact ionization in SiO2 with pulse widths from 7 ns to 150 fs," Applied physics letters 64, 3071-3073 (1994)

    1994

  8. [16]

    Short-Pulse Laser Damage in Transparent Materials as a Function of Pulse Duration,

    A. C. Tien, et al., "Short-Pulse Laser Damage in Transparent Materials as a Function of Pulse Duration," Physical Review Letters 82, 3883-3886 (1999)

    1999

  9. [17]

    Single-shot high aspect ratio bulk nanostructuring of fused silica using chirp-controlled ultrafast laser Bessel beams,

    M. K. Bhuyan, et al., "Single-shot high aspect ratio bulk nanostructuring of fused silica using chirp-controlled ultrafast laser Bessel beams," Applied Physics Letters 104, 219-377 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Generation of multiple stress waves in silica glass in high fluence femtosecond laser ablation,

    H. Hu, et al., "Generation of multiple stress waves in silica glass in high fluence femtosecond laser ablation," Applied Physics Letters 97, 061117 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Evidencing the nonlinearity independence of resolution in femtosecond laser ablation,

    M. Garcia-Lechuga, et al., "Evidencing the nonlinearity independence of resolution in femtosecond laser ablation," Optics Letters 45, 952-955 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Ultrashort pulse laser ablation of dielectrics: Thresholds, mechanisms, role of breakdown,

    I. Mirza, et al., "Ultrashort pulse laser ablation of dielectrics: Thresholds, mechanisms, role of breakdown," Scientific Reports 6, 39133 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    In-situ microscopy of front and rear side ablation processes in alkali aluminosilicate glass using ultra short pulsed laser radiation,

    D. Grossmann, et al., "In-situ microscopy of front and rear side ablation processes in alkali aluminosilicate glass using ultra short pulsed laser radiation," Optics Express 25, 28478-28488 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Energy deposition at front and rear surfaces during picosecond laser interaction with fused silica,

    A., et al., "Energy deposition at front and rear surfaces during picosecond laser interaction with fused silica," Applied Physics Letters 78, 2840-2840 (2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    Laser welding of glasses at high repetition rates – Fundamentals and prospects,

    S. Richter, et al., "Laser welding of glasses at high repetition rates – Fundamentals and prospects," Optics & Laser Technology 83, 59-66 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Nanochannels with a 18-nm feature size and ultrahigh aspect ratio on silica through surface assisting material ejection,

    Y. Lu, et al., "Nanochannels with a 18-nm feature size and ultrahigh aspect ratio on silica through surface assisting material ejection," 1, 026004 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Quantitative Mapping of Transient Thermodynamic States in Ultrafast Laser Nanostructuring of Quartz,

    H. D. Nguyen, et al., "Quantitative Mapping of Transient Thermodynamic States in Ultrafast Laser Nanostructuring of Quartz," Ultrafast Science 4, 0056 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Nanochannels with a 18-nm feature size and ultrahigh aspect ratio on silica through surface assisting material ejection,

    Y. Lu, et al., "Nanochannels with a 18-nm feature size and ultrahigh aspect ratio on silica through surface assisting material ejection," Advanced Photonics Nexus 1, 026004 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Single-shot high aspect ratio bulk nanostructuring of fused silica using chirp-controlled ultrafast laser Bessel beams,

    M. Bhuyan, et al., "Single-shot high aspect ratio bulk nanostructuring of fused silica using chirp-controlled ultrafast laser Bessel beams," Applied Physics Letters 104, 021107 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Bandgap limited photon energy deposition innondiffractive ultrafast laser surface and volume structuring,

    H. Zhang, et al., "Bandgap limited photon energy deposition innondiffractive ultrafast laser surface and volume structuring," to be published(2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Filamentation in Kerr media from pulsed Bessel beams,

    P. Polesana, et al., "Filamentation in Kerr media from pulsed Bessel beams," Physical Review A 77, 043814 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    Filamentation and damage in fused silica induced by tightly focused femtosecond laser pulses,

    A. Couairon, et al., "Filamentation and damage in fused silica induced by tightly focused femtosecond laser pulses," Physical Review B 71, 125435 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    Structural, dielectric, and antimicrobial evaluation of PMMA/CeO2 for optoelectronic devices,

    A. M. Bakr, et al., "Structural, dielectric, and antimicrobial evaluation of PMMA/CeO2 for optoelectronic devices," Scientific Reports 14, 2548 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Thermal and mechanical limitations to processing resolution in volume non-diffractive ultrafast laser structuring,

    G. Zhang, et al., "Thermal and mechanical limitations to processing resolution in volume non-diffractive ultrafast laser structuring," Applied Surface Science 570, 151170 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.