Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Over-the-air Multifunctional Wideband Electromagnetic Signal Processing using Dynamic Scattering Arrays

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read One impedance-matrix model folds ESPAR, SIM, and dynamic scattering arrays into a single family of over-the-air electromagnetic processors.

desk verdict Clean wideband DSA model with a useful SIM special case, but the headline performance claims rest on numbers a referee still cannot see. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00619 v1 pith:5JORRFAD submitted 2025-05-31 eess.SP

Davide Dardari This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords dynamicscatteringarrayelectromagneticsignalprocessingholographicMIMOstackedintelligentmetasurfacesuperdirectivityreconfigurableloadswidebandbeamformingimpedancematrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a dynamic scattering array (DSA)—a few active antennas surrounded by many reconfigurable passive scatterers—is fully described by a frequency-dependent impedance matrix plus the load states, so that its end-to-end transfer can be written in closed form. From that description, a single optimization over loads, matching impedances, and an optional digital precoder can make one structure approximate several desired wideband responses at once, such as superdirective beamforming, multi-user MISO, and MIMO precoding, with far fewer radio-frequency chains than conventional arrays. The paper further claims that existing electromagnetic processing structures, notably stacked intelligent metasurfaces (SIMs) and ESPARs, are special cases of this same model, and that the DSA is more flexible and more compact because every element contributes jointly to processing and radiation. If these claims hold, much of the signal processing now done digitally could move directly into the antenna structure, lowering complexity and power consumption in future holographic MIMO systems.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the frequency-dependent impedance matrix $\mathbf{Z}(f)$ of the whole DSA as an $N$-port network, partitioned into active-active, active-scatterer, scatterer-active, and scatterer-scatterer blocks. Eq. (3) eliminates the scatterer ports under the load condition $\mathbf{v}_S=-\mathbf{Z}_S(f;\boldsymbol{\theta})\mathbf{i}_S$ and produces the load-dependent input impedance $\mathbf{Z}_A(f;\boldsymbol{\theta})$. Combining this with either a lossless matching network (eqs. 7-13) or a simplified network made of extra reconfigurable loads (eqs. 14-16) gives the end-to-end EM processing matrix $\mathbf{W}_{\text{EM}}(f;\boldsymbol{\psi})$ that maps RF-chain voltages to the full current vector, which then radiates to test points through the channel transimpedance $\mathbf{H}_c(f)$. The paper's design algorithm is the alternating optimization (22)-(27), which alternates between closed-form digital precoders and a numerical search over the load parameter vector $\boldsymbol{\psi}$; the SIM reduction is obtained by imposing the block lower bidiagonal structure (17) and applying iterative Schur complements to obtain the cascade (19).

What would settle it

Build a small DSA with a few active dipoles and varactor-loaded passive scatterers, measure the full impedance matrix at several bias voltages, and independently measure the output currents or far fields; then compare the measured $\mathbf{Z}_A(f;\boldsymbol{\theta})$ with the value predicted by eq. (3) using a single fixed $\mathbf{Z}(f)$. A systematic mismatch beyond the measurement uncertainty at the operating frequencies would falsify the model and invalidate the optimized currents computed by (22)-(27).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that any DSA, regardless of geometry or coupling complexity, has an input impedance $\mathbf{Z}_A(f;\boldsymbol{\theta}) = \mathbf{Z}_{AA}(f) - \mathbf{Z}_{AS}(f)(\mathbf{Z}_{SS}(f)+\mathbf{Z}_S(f;\boldsymbol{\theta}))^{-1}\mathbf{Z}_{SA}(f)$ (eq. 3), so that the total current vector is a load-dependent linear transform $\mathbf{i}(f)=\mathbf{W}_{\text{EM}}(f;\boldsymbol{\psi})\mathbf{v}_G(f)$ of the RF-chain open-circuit voltages. This transform, together with the end-to-end channel expression in (21), lets the designer solve the optimization (22) for the scatterer loads, matching loads, and digital precoder that best approximate a prescribed set of multifrequency, multifunctional responses. The paper also claims that a SIM corresponds to the special block lower bidiagonal impedance matrix (17), which yields the cascade formula (19) for the last-layer currents; in the DSA, by contrast, all elements radiate and interact, which is why the DSA can achieve better fidelity and superdirective behavior in arbitrary directions, not only end-fire, with element spacings as small as $\lambda/4$.

Load-bearing premise

The design procedure assumes the DSA can be represented by one fixed, load-independent impedance matrix $\mathbf{Z}(f)$ that is known at design time, and that the receiving antennas used as test points are far enough away that they do not electrically load the structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ESPAR, SIM, and DSA structures can all be designed inside one wideband impedance-matrix framework, so a single optimization pipeline replaces structure-specific modeling efforts.
  • A single DSA with a small number of RF chains can approximate several different processing functions at several frequencies simultaneously, reducing the digital bottleneck in massive MIMO.
  • The simplified matching network made of reconfigurable loads incurs no significant loss in the reported cases, removing the need for an adaptive perfect power-matching network.
  • Superdirective beamforming is claimed possible in any direction, not only end-fire, so tightly coupled DSAs could provide high gain from electrically compact apertures.
  • The DSA's full mutual-coupling model captures the inter-layer and backscattering effects that the idealized SIM cascade ignores, giving a quantitative handle on when SIM approximations break down.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the load-independence of $\mathbf{Z}(f)$ holds experimentally, the same framework could be inverted to design wideband analog combiners on receive, cutting RF and ADC chains in uplink MIMO.
  • The gap between the SIM cascade (19) and a full DSA treatment should grow as layer spacing shrinks; a controlled experiment varying inter-layer distance could quantify exactly how much the SIM approximation costs.
  • Since the optimization (22) is formulated per frequency, the DSA design could be extended to simultaneously shape the radiation pattern and the frequency response, enabling joint beamforming and spectral shaping in one aperture.
  • The $Q$-factor expression in (4)-(5) suggests the optimization could be augmented with a bandwidth or efficiency constraint, yielding superdirective designs with controlled reactive energy storage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a general wideband analytical framework for dynamic scattering arrays (DSAs), modeling them as linear frequency-selective N-port networks with reconfigurable loads. It derives the input impedance via a Schur complement (Eq. (3)), relates RF-chain voltages to element currents through an EM processing matrix W_EM (Eqs. (12)-(16)), and introduces a simplified matching network and an optional digital precoder. It then shows that a stacked intelligent metasurface (SIM) corresponds to a block lower bidiagonal impedance matrix, leading to the cascade form in Eq. (19), and develops an alternating optimization procedure to design loads and precoders for wideband multifunctional responses. Numerical applications are proposed for superdirective beamforming, multi-user MISO, and MIMO precoding.

Significance. If the numerical results substantiate the claims, the framework provides a unified treatment of ESPAR/SIM-type structures, a practical design algorithm with realistic varactor loads, and a promising route to reduce RF chains in holographic MIMO while achieving superdirectivity in arbitrary directions. The paper's derivations are self-contained and transparent, and the explicit inclusion of a simplified matching network and Q-factor estimation are clear strengths. The main open risks are the physical realizability of the SIM baseline and the assumptions on load-independent impedance and non-loading test points, which need to be addressed to solidify the conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II-D, Eq. (17)] The matrix structure defining the SIM as a particular case sets Z_AS = 0 while Z_SA = [B1; 0; ...] is nonzero, which violates the reciprocity condition Z = Z^T expected for a passive linear network. Since Section II introduces Z(f) as the physical impedance matrix of the DSA and the numerical comparison uses this SIM model as a baseline, the unification claim and the reported DSA advantage over SIM rest on an idealized unilateral model. Please either justify the use of non-reciprocal impedance matrices in the DSA framework, or derive and test a reciprocal SIM model (e.g., with Z_AS = Z_SA^T and small backscattering) and discuss whether Eq. (19) and the numerical conclusions remain valid.
  2. [Sec. II, Eqs. (2)-(3), and Sec. III] The design procedure assumes Z(f) is independent of the reconfigurable load states and that the test-point antennas do not load the DSA. With tightly coupled subwavelength scatterers, integrated varactor loads may alter the effective element geometry and mutual coupling as a function of bias, potentially making Z(f) depend on θ and invalidating Eq. (3) and the currents used in the optimization (22)-(27). The paper should state the conditions under which these assumptions hold and provide a validation (e.g., a full-wave simulation across bias states) or a sensitivity discussion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (20)] The diagonal matrix diag{z(f; θ_{p_l+1}), ..., z(f; θ_{p_l+1})} repeats the same lower index; likely θ_{p_l+1}, ..., θ_{p_{l+1}} was intended.
  2. [Eq. (17)] The last block row should contain B_L before A_L in the block lower bidiagonal matrix; as written the displayed matrix omits B_L.
  3. [Eq. (21) and surrounding text] The noise covariance is written as σ^2 I_K, but y(f_k) has dimension T, so the covariance should be σ^2 I_T.
  4. [Sec. III-A, Step 1] If the target matrix H_opt_k is such that the pseudo-inverse term in (24) is zero, then α_k = 0 and W_Dk is undefined; a regularization or handling of this degenerate case should be mentioned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the DSA transfer model and the SIM particular-case cascade are derived from stated impedance-matrix assumptions, and the optimization is inverse design rather than disguised prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Eq. (3) is the Schur complement of the load-terminated N-port relation (2) with vS=-ZS(θ)iS; no quantity is defined in terms of the target response. The end-to-end transfer WEM in (13)/(16) follows algebraically from the matching-network relations (7)-(8) or (14)-(15), and the subsequent optimization in (22)-(27) explicitly fits the reconfigurable loads and optional digital precoder to a user-supplied H_opt: this is the intended design task, not a fitted parameter later relabeled as a prediction. The SIM reduction in Sec. II-D is also an honest derivation: given the stated SIM assumption of only forward layer coupling and no intra-layer coupling, the block lower bidiagonal impedance matrix in (17) is written down and eq. (19) is obtained by iterative Schur complement, so the cascade is computed from the assumption rather than imported. Self-citations [24],[25] introduce the DSA concept but the framework is re-derived in this paper and no uniqueness theorem or prior result is used to force the conclusions. One non-circular caveat should be weighed separately: the SIM particular case sets Z_AS=0 while retaining nonzero Z_SA=B1, which is a non-reciprocal matrix for a passive structure; the paper explicitly acknowledges that model (19) neglects backscattering and same-layer coupling. This is a physical-consistency limitation of the unification claim, not a circular reduction, and is already flagged by the manuscript itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

These are the intended design degrees of freedom, treated as optimization variables; their presence is not a flaw, but the ledger records them because all performance numbers depend on their fitted values. The central derivation rests on standard N-port network theory plus modeling assumptions about the impedance matrix being load-independent, the far-field test points not loading the structure, and the SIM-specific forward-only coupling.

free parameters (6)
  • Scatterer load parameters θ_i (i=1..N_S) = Optimized per use case in Sec. IV
    Design variables tuned in (22)-(27) to approximate the target channel matrices H_opt; they define the DSA configuration.
  • Matching load parameters φ_i (i=1..N_A) = Optimized per use case in Sec. IV
    Series impedances in the simplified matching network, included in the optimization.
  • Digital precoder matrices W_Dk = Closed-form via (24)-(26)
    Per-subcarrier precoders computed by pseudo-inverse for fixed ψ; part of the design freedom.
  • Link-budget scale factors α_k = Closed-form via (25)
    Scales absorbing the gap between achievable response and target; fitted to each subcarrier.
  • DSA geometry (N_A, N_S, positions, T test points, frequencies) = Chosen per use case (e.g., λ/4 spacing)
    Geometry and evaluation grid are hand-selected inputs; performance numbers depend on them.
  • Varactor diode model parameters = Stated varactor model in Sec. IV-A
    Realistic load impedances z(f;θ) require device parameters; these are inputs to the optimization.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The DSA is a linear frequency-selective N-port network with voltage-current relation v(f)=Z(f)i(f), and Z(f) is independent of the loads.
    Invoked throughout Sec. II (eqs. (1)-(3)); the core modeling premise, standard for antenna arrays but unvalidated here for tightly coupled wideband elements.
  • domain assumption Test-point receiving antennas lie in the radiative region and do not perturb the DSA.
    Stated in Sec. III before eq. (21); needed for the transimpedance channel H_c(f) to be independent of the load design.
  • domain assumption SIM modeling assumptions: no coupling within a layer, only forward inter-layer coupling, yielding a block lower bidiagonal Z (eq. (17)).
    Imported from the SIM literature [22], [36]; basis of the reduction to eq. (19).
  • domain assumption Wideband multicarrier signaling with K subcarriers and per-subcarrier linear digital processing.
    Introduced in Sec. III; frames the space-frequency processing but simplifies to a finite set of frequency samples.
  • domain assumption The perfect power-matching network has the impedance form (8) from [41], with no losses.
    Eq. (8) is cited from prior literature; it fixes the achievable power-transfer structure.
  • standard math Standard matrix algebra: Schur complement, pseudo-inverse least-squares solutions, Frobenius norm manipulations.
    Used in eqs. (3), (19), (24)-(26); standard textbook results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Over-the-air Multifunctional Wideband Electromagnetic Signal Processing using Dynamic Scattering Arrays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5JORRFAD

@misc{pith2026250600619,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Over-the-air Multifunctional Wideband Electromagnetic Signal Processing using Dynamic Scattering Arrays},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5JORRFAD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00619}
}
read the original abstract

To meet the stringent requirements of next-generation wireless networks, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology is expected to become massive and pervasive. Unfortunately, this could pose scalability issues in terms of complexity, power consumption, cost, and processing latency. Therefore, novel technologies and design approaches, such as the recently introduced holographic MIMO paradigm, must be investigated to make future networks sustainable. In this context, we investigate the concept of a dynamic scattering array (DSA) as a versatile electromagnetic (EM) structure capable of performing joint wave-based computing and radiation by moving the processing from the digital domain to the EM domain. We provide a general, wideband analytical framework for modeling the DSA, which includes a power matching network and realistic reconfigurable loads. Then we introduce specific design algorithms, and apply them to various use cases. We demonstrate that some recent EM processing structures can be seen as particular cases of our general framework. The examples presented in the numerical results corroborate the potential of DSAs to reduce complexity and the number of radiofrequency (RF) chains in holographic MIMO systems while achieving enhanced EM wave processing and radiation flexibility for tasks such as beamforming and single- and multi-user MIMO, also exhibiting superdirectivity capabilities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00619 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Principle scheme of a dynamic scattering array with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simplified matching network. From (7) and (8) it is iA( 𝑓 ) = 1 𝚥2 √ 𝑅 ℜ {ZA( 𝑓 ; θ)} − 1 2 vG( 𝑓 ) . (10) Moreover, we have i( 𝑓 ) =  I𝑁A − (ZSS( 𝑓 ) + ZS( 𝑓 ; θ)) −1 ZSA( 𝑓 )  · iA( 𝑓 ) . (11) By combining (10) and (11), we obtain a compact relation￾ship between the open-circuit voltages of the RF chains vG( 𝑓 ) and the total current i( 𝑓 ) flowing in the DSA i( 𝑓 ) = WEM ( 𝑓 ; ψ) vG( 𝑓 ) (12) where WEM ( 𝑓 ; ψ)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Use case 1: Single RF chain DSA for superdirective beamforming. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Use case 2: Multi-user downlink MISO with a DSA. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Equivalent circuit model of a varactor diode used as reconfigurable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radiation diagram of a disk-shaped DSA ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Radiation pattern of a conventional ULA with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Multi-frequency radiation diagrams of a disk-shaped DSA with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Multi-frequency multi-input radiation diagrams of a disk-shaped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sum spectral efficiency of a zero-forcing 4-user MISO system based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    What should 6G be?

    A. Dang, S., B. O., Shihada, and et al., “What should 6G be?” Nature Electronics 3, vol. 20-29, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6G: Vision, techniques, and applications,

    N. Gonzalez-Prelcic, M. Furkan Keskin, O. Kaltiokallio, M. Valkama, D. Dardari, X. Shen, Y . Shen, M. Bayraktar, and H. Wymeersch, “The integrated sensing and communication revolution for 6G: Vision, techniques, and applications,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 676–723, July 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Massive MIMO is a reality - what is next?: Five promising research directions for antenna arrays,

    E. Bj ¨ornson, L. Sanguinetti, H. Wymeersch, J. Hoydis, and T. L. Marzetta, “Massive MIMO is a reality - what is next?: Five promising research directions for antenna arrays,” Digital Signal Processing , 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051200419300776

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Holographic communication using intel- ligent surfaces,

    D. Dardari and N. Decarli, “Holographic communication using intel- ligent surfaces,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 35–41, June 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Twenty-five years of signal processing advances for multiantenna communications: From theory to mainstream technology,

    E. Bj ¨ornson, Y . C. Eldar, E. G. Larsson, A. Lozano, and H. V . Poor, “Twenty-five years of signal processing advances for multiantenna communications: From theory to mainstream technology,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 107–117, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Next generation advanced transceiver tech- nologies for 6G and beyond,

    C. You, Y . Cai, Y . Liu, M. D. Renzo, T. M. Duman, A. Yener, and A. Lee Swindlehurst, “Next generation advanced transceiver tech- nologies for 6G and beyond,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Embracing reconfigurable antennas in the tri-hybrid MIMO architecture for 6G,

    M. R. Castellanos, S. Yang, C.-B. Chae, and R. W. Heath, “Embracing reconfigurable antennas in the tri-hybrid MIMO architecture for 6G,”

    work page

  8. [8]

    Extremely large-scale MIMO: Fundamentals, challenges, solutions, and future directions,

    Z. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Du, W. E. I. Sha, B. Ai, D. Niyato, and M. Debbah, “Extremely large-scale MIMO: Fundamentals, challenges, solutions, and future directions,” IEEE Wireless Communications , pp. 1–9, 2023

    2023

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Near-field MIMO communication links,

    S. Phang, M. T. Ivrla, G. Gradoni, S. C. Creagh, G. Tanner, and J. A. Nossek, “Near-field MIMO communication links,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers , vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 3027– 3036, 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    Communication modes with large intelligent surfaces in the near field,

    N. Decarli and D. Dardari, “Communication modes with large intelligent surfaces in the near field,” IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 165 648–165 666, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Near-Field Communi- cations: What Will Be Different?

    Y . Liu, J. Xu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, and L. Hanzo, “Near-Field Communi- cations: What Will Be Different?” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2303.04003, Mar. 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communications,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, M. F. Imani, and Y . C. Eldar, “Beam focusing for near-field multiuser MIMO communications,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7476–7490, Sep. 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    6G wireless communications: From far-field beam steering to near-field beam focusing,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, and Y . C. Eldar, “6G wireless communications: From far-field beam steering to near-field beam focusing,” IEEE Communications Magazine , vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 72–77, April 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Holographic MIMO commu- nications exploiting the orbital angular momentum,

    G. Torcolacci, N. Decarli, and D. Dardari, “Holographic MIMO commu- nications exploiting the orbital angular momentum,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 4, pp. 1452–1469, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave cellular systems,

    A. Alkhateeb, O. El Ayach, G. Leus, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave cellular systems,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing , vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 831–846, 2014

    2014

  8. [16]

    An Overview on Over-the-air Electromagnetic Signal Processing,

    D. Dardari, G. Torcolacci, G. Pasolini, and N. Decarli, “An Overview on Over-the-air Electromagnetic Signal Processing,” arXiv e-prints , p. arXiv:2412.14968, Dec. 2024, under revision on IEEE Signal Proc. Magazine

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Electromagnetic Information Theory: Fundamentals, Modeling, Applications, and Open Problems,

    J. Zhu, Z. Wan, L. Dai, M. Debbah, and H. V . Poor, “Electromagnetic Information Theory: Fundamentals, Modeling, Applications, and Open Problems,” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2212.02882, Dec. 2022

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Electromagnetic signal and infor- mation theory,

    M. D. Renzo and M. D. Migliore, “Electromagnetic signal and infor- mation theory,” IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine , pp. 1–13, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Towards 6G MIMO: Massive Spatial Multiplexing, Dense Arrays, and Interplay Between Electromagnetics and Processing,

    E. Bj ¨ornson, C.-B. Chae, J. Heath, Robert W., T. L. Marzetta, A. Mezghani, L. Sanguinetti, F. Rusek, M. R. Castellanos, D. Jun, and ¨O. Tugfe Demir, “Towards 6G MIMO: Massive Spatial Multiplexing, Dense Arrays, and Interplay Between Electromagnetics and Processing,” arXiv e-...

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Reconfigurable electromagnetic environments: A general framework,

    D. Dardari, “Reconfigurable electromagnetic environments: A general framework,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1479–1493, June 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials,

    A. Silva, F. Monticone, G. Castaldi, V . Galdi, A. Al `u, and N. Engheta, “Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials,” Science, vol. 343, no. 6167, pp. 160–163, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/343/6167/160

    2014

  14. [22]

    Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficient holographic MIMO communications in 6G,

    J. An, C. Xu, D. W. K. Ng, G. C. Alexandropoulos, C. Huang, C. Yuen, and L. Hanzo, “Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficient holographic MIMO communications in 6G,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2380–2396, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Holographic MIMO communications: Theoretical foundations, enabling technologies, and future directions,

    T. Gong, P. Gavriilidis, R. Ji, C. Huang, G. C. Alexandropoulos, L. Wei, Z. Zhang, M. Debbah, H. V . Poor, and C. Yuen, “Holographic MIMO communications: Theoretical foundations, enabling technologies, and future directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 26, ...

    2024

  16. [24]

    3D electromagnetic signal processing,

    D. Dardari, “3D electromagnetic signal processing,” in Proc. Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers , Oct 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Dynamic Scattering Arrays for Simultaneous Electromag- netic Processing and Radiation in Holographic MIMO Systems,

    D. Dardari, “Dynamic Scattering Arrays for Simultaneous Electromag- netic Processing and Radiation in Holographic MIMO Systems,” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2405.16174, May 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Reactively controlled directive arrays,

    R. Harrington, “Reactively controlled directive arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 390–395, May 1978

    1978

  19. [27]

    Kalis, A

    A. Kalis, A. G. Kanatas, and C. B. Papadias, Parasitic Antenna Arrays for Wireless MIMO Systems . Springer New York, NY , 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    Beam transmission of ultra short waves: An introduction to the classic paper by H. Yagi,

    D. Pozar, “Beam transmission of ultra short waves: An introduction to the classic paper by H. Yagi,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 1857–1863, 1997

    1997

  21. [29]

    Precoding for multiuser MIMO systems with single-fed parasitic antenna arrays,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, V . I. Barousis, and C. B. Papadias, “Precoding for multiuser MIMO systems with single-fed parasitic antenna arrays,” in 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference , 2014, pp. 3897–3902

    2014

  22. [30]

    Low-complexity adaptive spatial processing of ESPAR antenna systems,

    J. C. Bucheli Garcia, M. Kamoun, and A. Sibille, “Low-complexity adaptive spatial processing of ESPAR antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. ”, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 3700–3711, Feb. 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Metasurface antennas: New models, applications and realizations,

    M. Faenzi, G. Minatti, D. Gonz ´alez-Ovejero, F. Caminita, E. Martini, C. D. Giovampaola, and S. Maci, “Metasurface antennas: New models, applications and realizations,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 10178, pp. 1–14, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    Dynamic metasurface antennas for 6G extreme massive MIMO communications,

    N. Shlezinger, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. F. Imani, Y . C. Eldar, and D. R. Smith, “Dynamic metasurface antennas for 6G extreme massive MIMO communications,” IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2021

    2021

  25. [33]

    Fluid antenna system - Part I: Preliminaries,

    K.-K. Wong, W. K. New, X. Hao, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “Fluid antenna system - Part I: Preliminaries,” IEEE Communications Letters , vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1919–1923, 2023

    1919

  26. [34]

    A reconfigurable aperture antenna based on switched links between electrically small metallic patches,

    L. Pringle, P. Harms, S. Blalock, G. Kiesel, E. Kuster, P. Friederich, R. Prado, J. Morris, and G. Smith, “A reconfigurable aperture antenna based on switched links between electrically small metallic patches,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 52, no. 6, pp...

    2004

  27. [35]

    Frequency, radiation pattern and polarization reconfigurable antenna using a parasitic pixel layer,

    D. Rodrigo, B. A. Cetiner, and L. Jofre, “Frequency, radiation pattern and polarization reconfigurable antenna using a parasitic pixel layer,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3422–3427, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Efficient beamforming and radiation pattern control using stacked intelligent metasurfaces,

    N. U. Hassan, J. An, M. Di Renzo, M. Debbah, and C. Yuen, “Efficient beamforming and radiation pattern control using stacked intelligent metasurfaces,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , vol. 5, pp. 599–611, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Stacked Intelligent Metasurfaces for Multiuser Downlink Beamforming in the Wave Domain,

    J. An, M. Di Renzo, M. Debbah, H. V . Poor, and C. Yuen, “Stacked Intelligent Metasurfaces for Multiuser Downlink Beamforming in the Wave Domain,” arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2309.02687, Sep. 2023

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Two-dimensional direction-of-arrival estimation using stacked intelligent metasurfaces,

    J. An, C. Yuen, Y . L. Guan, M. D. Renzo, M. Debbah, H. V . Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Two-dimensional direction-of-arrival estimation using stacked intelligent metasurfaces,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2786–2802, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Classification of metal handwritten digits based on microwave diffractive deep neural network,

    C. Liu, L. Ma, Q., Z.J., and et al., “Classification of metal handwritten digits based on microwave diffractive deep neural network,” Nat Elec- tron, no. 5, pp. 113–122, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Classification of metal handwritten digits based on microwave diffractive deep neural network,

    Z. Gu, Q. Ma, X. Gao, J. W. You, and T. J. Cui, “Classification of metal handwritten digits based on microwave diffractive deep neural network,” Advanced Optical Materials , vol. 12, no. 7, p. 2301938, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/...

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Toward a circuit theory of communi- cation,

    M. T. Ivrlac and J. A. Nossek, “Toward a circuit theory of communi- cation,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers , vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1663–1683, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    Coupling matrix-based beamform- ing for superdirective antenna arrays,

    L. Han, H. Yin, and T. L. Marzetta, “Coupling matrix-based beamform- ing for superdirective antenna arrays,” in ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications , 2022, pp. 5159–5164

    2022

  35. [43]

    C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design . New Jersey, USA: Wiley, 2016

    2016

  36. [44]

    Improved adaptive impedance matching for RF front-end systems of wireless transceivers,

    Alibakhshikenari, M. Virdee, P. B.S. Shukla, and et al., “Improved adaptive impedance matching for RF front-end systems of wireless transceivers,” Sci Rep 10 , no. 14065, pp. 1–11, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Fletcher, Practical Methods of Optimization - Vol

    R. Fletcher, Practical Methods of Optimization - Vol. I . John Wiley and Sons, 1980

    1980

  38. [46]

    Tse and P

    D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005

    2005

  39. [47]

    Intelligent reflecting surface: Practical phase shift model and beamforming optimization,

    S. Abeywickrama, R. Zhang, Q. Wu, and C. Yuen, “Intelligent reflecting surface: Practical phase shift model and beamforming optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 5849–5863, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Fully-addressable varactor-based reflecting metasurface with dual-linear polarisation for low power reconfigurable intelligent sur- faces,

    J. Rains, J. U. R. Kazim, A. Tukmanov, L. Zhang, Q. Abbasi, and M. Imran, “Fully-addressable varactor-based reflecting metasurface with dual-linear polarisation for low power reconfigurable intelligent sur- faces,” in 2023 17th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (...

    2023

  41. [49]

    The multiport communication theory,

    M. T. Ivrlac and J. A. Nossek, “The multiport communication theory,” IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine , vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 27–44, 2014

    2014

  42. [2025]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16610

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16610

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.