Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 225 references

Super-Resonance: Interference-Driven Suppression of Radiative Decay Across Wave Physics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that the term 'super-resonance' should be reserved for one mechanism: radiative linewidth driven to zero by destructive interference among a mode's radiation channels, while its bare coupling to the environment stays larg

desk verdict A useful and mostly honest taxonomy of super-resonance, with a real definitional overreach where M1 absorbs topological and band-gap channel closure. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.19819 v1 pith:5JQPD6JX submitted 2026-07-22 physics.optics

Igor V. Minin , Oleg V. Minin , Ilia L. Rasskazov This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords super-resonanceboundstatesinthecontinuumradiativelinewidthsuppressionnon-HermitianHamiltonianquasi-BICmetasurfacesmagnondarkmodescoherentperfectabsorptionFanoresonance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

A precise definition, not a loose umbrella, is the paper's point: a super-resonance is a mode whose radiative linewidth is driven toward zero by destructive interference among its radiation channels, γ_rad/γ^cl_rad → 0, while the mode's bare single-channel coupling remains large. The paper shows that the same non-Hermitian eigenvalue problem appears in acoustic cavity arrays, photonic bound states in the continuum and quasi-BIC metasurface modes, anapoles, coherent-perfect-absorber dark modes, parity–time-symmetric systems, magnonic dark modes, and topological edge modes. It then disambiguates this suppression mechanism from coherent enhancement (collective super-radiance, superscattering, whispering-gallery modes), from integer-commensurability locking (planetary resonances, Floquet replicas, plasma wave–particle resonance), and from amplification (black-hole super-radiance). If the mapping holds, design rules and figures of merit such as Q, Purcell factor, cooperativity, and effective interaction length transfer directly across acoustics, photonics, and magnonics, and the many independent coinages of 'super-resonance' collapse into one physics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian Ĥ_eff = M − iΓ, where M encodes conservative dynamics and Γ collects radiative and non-radiative loss channels. Its complex eigenfrequencies ω̃_n = ω_n − iγ_n/2 define the resonances, and the central identity is the operational criterion γ_rad/γ^cl_rad → 0, equivalently Q_super/Q_cl → ∞. The canonical construction is the two-mode, one-continuum interference scenario: two modes with bare frequencies, decay rates, a direct near-field coupling, and a coupling mediated by the shared continuum; at a specific detuning condition one eigenvalue's imaginary part vanishes exactly. This two-mode interference template is what the paper c

What would settle it

Construct the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian for a symmetry-protected topological edge mode and compare it term-by-term with the two-mode, one-continuum interference model at the same operating point. If the zero radiative width in the topological case arises from an empty block in the radiative-coupling matrix rather than from cancellation of nonzero off-diagonal couplings, the two systems are not the same eigenvalue problem, and no continuous path in Hamiltonian space connects one zero to the other without the width becoming finite. A field measurement that distinguishes the two: break

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the many phenomena called super-resonance in different communities share one field-agnostic mechanism: the radiative width of a mode is a coherent sum of partial amplitudes, and destructive interference among those amplitudes drives the width below the single-channel value, with the ratio vanishing in the ideal limit. The canonical realisation is the two-mode, one-continuum scenario in which an avoided crossing makes the imaginary part of one complex eigenfrequency vanish exactly, producing a genuine bound state in the continuum. The review asserts that this same eigenvalue structure underlies super-resonant acoustic arrays, photonic BICs and supercavity modes, anap

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that closing the radiation channel by making the symmetry-allowed channel set empty—as in topological edge modes—is the same mechanism as cancelling nonzero partial amplitudes by destructive interference; the paper itself notes the topological case is channel closure by symmetry rather than amplitude cancellation, so if those are distinct, the claim that all the listed systems are the same eigenvalue problem overreaches.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Accepting the criterion means quasi-BIC metasurfaces, super-resonant acoustic arrays, magnon dark modes, and CPA dark modes can be designed with the same coupled-mode machinery and the same inverse-square Q-scaling laws.
  • The derived figures of merit—Purcell factor, cooperativity, effective interaction length—diverge together with Q at fixed mode volume, so an M1 super-resonance improves sensing slopes, cavity-QED coupling, and nonlinear conversion in one transferable step.
  • The disambiguation removes collective super-radiance, superscattering, whispering-gallery modes, and high-order multipole resonances from the super-resonance category, redirecting their figures of merit to enhancement rather than suppression.
  • Non-radiative loss caps the attainable Q, so the strict γ_rad→0 limit is reached only in lossless ideal systems; in practice super-resonance means a high-Q leaky mode whose Q is set by the loss plateau.
  • Topological and Floquet super-resonances add disorder robustness by closing channels with a global invariant or locking them with a drive commensurability, relaxing the fabrication tolerance that limits fine-tuned interference designs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the unified criterion is right, unexplored wave systems—elastic metamaterials, cold-atom arrays, even the lossy Earth–ionosphere cavity—become searchable for accidental two-mode interference degeneracies that produce dark states, rather than merely for high-Q geometric modes.
  • The tolerance data suggest practical super-resonant devices will depend on active feedback or topological protection: the channel reopens only quadratically with control-parameter drift, but the high-order multipole 'needle' loses half its response at fractional size-parameter shifts near 10^-8, a precision few platforms can hold passively.
  • A concrete testable extension: measure how a topological edge mode's radiative width reopens as its protecting symmetry is broken; quadratic reopening would match the quasi-BIC law, while linear reopening would point to a distinct channel-closure mechanism that the paper's identification would need to split off.
  • The proposed on-chip cascade of a mesoscale resonator, a quasi-BIC metasurface, and a Floquet topological waveguide is a falsifiable design target: if multiplicative composition of finesse survives across heterogeneous elements, it would validate the cross-field transfer; if not, the transfer rule needs qualification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review proposes a field-agnostic definition of 'super-resonance' as the destructive interference of radiation channels that drives γ_rad/γ_rad^cl to zero while the bare single-channel coupling remains large. The canonical realization is the Friedrich–Wintgen two-mode model, Eq. (4), and the paper surveys its supposed instances across acoustics, photonic BICs and quasi-BICs, anapoles, CPA, PT-symmetric and exceptional-point devices, magnonics, and topological/photonic-crystal systems. It also distinguishes this M1 mechanism from coherent enhancement (M2), integer-commensurability locking (M3), and amplification (A). The central claim is that 'a Tolstoy array of acoustic cavities, a quasi-BIC dielectric metasurface, a coherent-perfect-absorber dark mode, and a magnonic dark mode are all the same eigenvalue problem,' while topological edge modes and photonic-bandgap cavities are also labeled M1.

Significance. If the scope is restricted to genuine interference-driven suppression, the paper is a valuable contribution. The Friedrich–Wintgen derivation (Eq. (4) and Fig. 1) and the quasi-BIC inverse-square scaling (Fig. 7) are reproduced correctly; the paper is also careful to flag loss ceilings, EP-sensing noise caveats, and proposals versus demonstrated devices. The M2/M3 disambiguation is useful and largely accurate, and the survey is extensive. The main weakness is that the central M1 class is expanded to include channel-closure by symmetry, band gaps, and bulk invariants, which the text itself admits is not destructive interference. This is a load-bearing classification issue, not merely a terminological quibble, because Eq. (3) and the Friedrich–Wintgen Hamiltonian require a generically large bare coupling that is then cancelled by interference, whereas a selection rule that empties the channel set has no such two-amplitude cancellation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.7.1; Def. (3); Eq. (4)] The taxonomy is internally inconsistent at its own boundary. Sec. 3.7.1 states that a topological edge mode is 'an M1 super-resonance whose vanishing radiation rate is enforced by a global property of the band structure, not by a local fine-tuning of inter-mode coupling — the radiation channel is closed because the symmetry-allowed set of channels is empty, not because two amplitudes destructively interfere.' This is a self-declared counterexample to the Definition in Sec. 2.2: Eq. (3) requires a generically large bare single-channel coupling, and the canonical mechanism of Eq. (4) requires two nonzero bare decay rates γ1, γ2 and a continuum-mediated coupling √(γ1γ2) whose cancellation produces the dark state. Channel-closure by symmetry is a different mechanism. The abstract and Table 1 nevertheless list topological edge modes as instances of the 'same non-Hermitian eigenvalue structure
  2. [Sec. 3.5.5] Photonic-crystal nanocavities are classified as 'M1-type super-resonances' because 'the photonic band gap forbids the propagation channels through which the bare mode would otherwise leak.' The same objection applies: if the channel set is empty, γ_rad^cl is undefined or vanishing, so criterion (3) cannot be met; if the cavity is a finite slab with residual vertical leakage, the high Q is better described as a small bare coupling, which Sec. 2.6 explicitly excludes ('an ordinary high-Q resonance ... is not super-resonant'). This case needs either reclassification or a quantitative demonstration that an interference cancellation, not merely channel closure, is responsible for the observed Q.
  3. [Sec. 3.7.5] The claim that 'every topological super-resonance is, at its mathematical core, an M1 phenomenon' because Γ_rad has a zero block dictated by the bulk invariant conflates two distinct effects. Topological protection, and the cited experiments (Refs. [199,200,202,204]), concerns immunity to backscattering and disorder, not the suppression of radiative decay into a surrounding continuum. In open 2D slab geometries topological edge states can radiate out of plane, and no concrete model in the paper shows γ_rad/γ_rad^cl → 0 for such a state. The section even substitutes 'back-scattering length' for Q as the figure of merit, which is a different observable. This weakens the cross-field unification claim rather than supporting it.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.11.3] 'We develop these applications in Sections 4.4 and 4.4' — duplicate section reference; should be Sec. 4.4 (or corrected to the intended second section).
  2. [Ref. [58]] The year is printed as '20224'; should be 2022.
  3. [Sec. 5, Rule 1] Rule 1 lists 'Sukhorukova magnonic dark mode [28]' but Ref. [28] concerns leaky surface magnon polarons; the dark magnon modes are Ref. [29]. Minor misattribution.
  4. [Fig. 10 caption] The PT-symmetric dimer/trimer parameters g and γ are not defined in the caption or the surrounding text. Please define them so the EP conditions are unambiguous.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Definitional overreach at the M1 boundary: channel-closure by symmetry is admitted to be non-interference yet retained as M1; the core Friedrich–Wintgen content is externally anchored and not circular.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 2.3 (Mechanism M1) and Sec. 3.7.1 (Photonic topological insulators)]
    "In the language of this review, the edge mode is an M1 super-resonance whose vanishing radiation rate is enforced by a global property of the band structure, not by a local fine-tuning of inter-mode coupling — the radiation channel is closed because the symmetry-allowed set of channels is empty, not because two amplitudes destructively interfere."

    M1 is defined in Sec. 2.3 as destructive interference of partial amplitudes (γrad = |Σα cα|²), with Eq. (3) requiring γrad/γcl_rad → 0 while the bare single-channel coupling remains large. A topological edge mode has no two amplitudes to interfere and no large bare coupling through an empty channel set. The sentence explicitly concedes this, yet classifies the edge mode as 'an M1 super-resonance.' The claimed cross-field unity — 'the same eigenvalue problem' — is therefore not derived for this case; it is imported by expanding M1 to include non-interference, making the classification self-definitional. The conclusion is the premise relabeled.

  2. renaming known result [Sec. 3.5.5 (Photonic-crystal nanocavities)]
    "These cavities are M1-type super-resonances: the photonic band gap forbids the propagation channels through which the bare mode would otherwise leak."

    This labels as M1 a mechanism that the paper's own definition excludes. Eq. (3) and Sec. 2.3 specify destructive interference among partial amplitudes with a generically large bare single-channel coupling; here the high Q comes from the absence of propagation channels, and the 'bare' coupling through those channels is zero by construction, not cancelled by interference. The known result (band-gap confinement) is renamed 'M1-type super-resonance,' so the claimed unity for this case is the renaming itself rather than a derived consequence of the Friedrich–Wintgen eigenvalue problem.

full rationale

The paper's central mathematical content — the Friedrich–Wintgen Hamiltonian Eq. (4), the operational criterion Eq. (3), the quasi-BIC α² scaling, and the bright/dark input–output model of Fig. 9 — is computed from stated non-Hermitian models and anchored to external literature (Friedrich–Wintgen, Hsu, Rybin, Koshelev), not fitted to the authors' own data. Self-citations (Minin/Minin mesoscale sphere work) are confined largely to the M2 contrast family, and the authors explicitly reclassify their own 'super-resonance' program as M2 rather than using it to force the M1 conclusion. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present. The only step that reduces to its own input is the taxonomic inclusion of channel-closure-by-symmetry within M1: Sec. 3.7.1 and Sec. 3.5.5 admit that topological edge modes and photonic-crystal nanocavities suppress radiation through an empty or forbidden channel set rather than through destructive interference, yet they are labelled M1. Since M1 is defined by interference, this is a self-definitional expansion of the class, not a derived consequence. It does not corrupt the core FW-based unification (Tolstoy arrays, quasi-BICs, CPA dark modes, magnonic dark modes), which remains externally anchored and non-circular. Score 4 reflects partial circularity at the boundary of the central taxonomy, with substantial independent content intact.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim introduces no new physical entity or fitted parameter. Figure computations use illustrative dimensionless or experimental-typical values (e.g., γ1=1, γ2=0.25, V=0.5 in Fig. 1; g/2π=25 MHz in Fig. 9), which are not fitted to any new data. The main 'ad hoc' additions are the M1/M2/M3 category boundaries and the assumption that symmetry/topological closure belongs to M1.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Effective open-system dynamics are captured by H_eff = M - i(Γ_rad + Γ_nr) with complex eigenvalues ω_n - iγ_n/2.
    Invoked in Sec. 2.1 as the unifying starting point; standard non-Hermitian resonance model.
  • domain assumption The radiative width can be represented as a coherent sum of partial amplitudes, γ_rad = |Σ c_α|², so that interference can drive it to zero.
    Sec. 2.3; necessary for Eq. (3) and the entire M1 mechanism.
  • domain assumption A well-defined single-channel 'classical' radiative rate γ^cl_rad exists for each mode considered.
    Secs. 2.2, 2.6; without this the central ratio in Eq. (3) is undefined.
  • ad hoc to paper Channel-closure by symmetry or bulk invariant (topological edge modes, photonic band-gap cavities) is the same mechanism as destructive interference.
    Secs. 3.5.5 and 3.7.1; needed to extend M1 beyond literal interference, but the paper itself concedes the channel is closed 'not because two amplitudes destructively interfere.'
  • ad hoc to paper The two-mode Friedrich-Wintgen model, or its radiative-matrix generalization, is sufficient to describe all systems classified as M1.
    Secs. 2.3, 3.1.1, 3.9.3; this is the central unification premise, asserted for each field rather than derived from first principles per system.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Super-Resonance: Interference-Driven Suppression of Radiative Decay Across Wave Physics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5JQPD6JX

@misc{pith2026260719819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Super-Resonance: Interference-Driven Suppression of Radiative Decay Across Wave Physics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5JQPD6JX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.19819}
}
abstract

Super-resonance has been coined independently for collective modes of acoustic cavity arrays (Tolstoy), extreme high-$Q$ states of dielectric resonators in photonics, and magnon-polaron bound states in magnonics, and is now applied interchangeably to physically distinct phenomena. We organise this review around the one usage admitting a precise, field-agnostic definition: a mode whose radiative linewidth is driven toward zero by destructive interference among its radiation channels, $\gamma_{\rm rad}/\gamma_{\rm rad}^{\rm cl}\to0$, while the bare single-channel coupling remains large. The canonical realisation is the Friedrich-Wintgen scenario of two modes sharing a continuum. The same non-Hermitian eigenvalue structure recurs in Tolstoy's acoustic arrays, photonic bound states in the continuum and quasi-BIC supercavity modes, anapoles, dark modes of coherent perfect absorbers, parity-time-symmetric devices near exceptional points, magnonic dark modes, and topological edge modes. We survey these realisations field by field and distil transferable design rules and figures of merit. We then disambiguate super-resonance from two families sharing the "super-" prefix: coherent enhancement, in which coupling to the continuum is collectively increased rather than suppressed (Dicke super-radiance, superscattering, whispering-gallery modes); and integer-commensurability locking (mean-motion, wave-particle, and Floquet resonances). Amplification, as in black-hole super-radiance, is likewise distinguished.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19819 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Friedrich–Wintgen interference (mechanism M1), computed from Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Fano line-shape family of Eq. (6) against the reduced detuning ε. At qF = 0 the interference of the narrow mode with the background carves a symmetric dip (transparency window); qF ≃ 1 yields the maximally asymmetric profile whose steep spectral slope underlies Fano-resonant refractometry (Sec. 4.1); for qF ≫ 1 the resonant channel dominates and the profile approaches a Lorentzian of peak height 1 + q 2 F . The … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Integer-commensurability locking (family M3) in the universal one-resonance (pendulum) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three motions of the complex eigenvalue ωe, each computed from the minimal model of its class; the shaded strip is the gain half-plane Im ω >e 0. (a) Suppression (M1): the locus traced by the two hybrid eigenvalues of the Friedrich–Wintgen Hamiltonian of [PITH_FULL_IM…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Collective radiative widths of N identical monopole resonators sharing the three-dimensional scalar radiation continuum — the minimal model of a Tolstoy super-resonant array [10, 11]. The widths are the eigenvalues of the radiative coupling matrix Γjk = γ j0(krjk) for …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: High-order Fano resonance of a mesoscale water sphere ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: From BIC to quasi-BIC (mechanism M1) in the minimal coupled-mode model. Breaking [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Radiative Q of whispering-gallery-type Mie resonances (first radial order, TE polarisation) versus multipole order n, for relative refractive indices m = 1.33 (water/silica-like) and m = 2. Each point is computed by locating the pole of the bn Mie denominator and measu…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Bright and dark collective modes of cavity magnonics, computed from the input–output [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Exceptional-point sensing: eigenvalue splitting versus perturbation strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The tolerance budget of Rules 5 and 6. (a) Re-opening of the radiative channel as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

225 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. H. Rindel. Acoustical aspects of the development of Greek theaters in the 4th century B.C.E. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 157(3):2042–2066, 2025. doi: 10.1121/10.0036255

    work page doi:10.1121/10.0036255

  2. [2]

    T. Kennedy. The Bronze Age destruction of Jericho, archaeology, and the Book of Joshua. Religions, 14(6):796, 2023. doi: 10.3390/rel14060796

    work page doi:10.3390/rel14060796 2023

  3. [3]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    Andrea Frova and Mariapiera Marenzana.Thus Spoke Galileo: The Great Scientist’s Ideas and Their Relevance to the Present Day. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006

    2006

  4. [4]

    Theorie der Luftschwingungen in Röhren mit offenen Enden.Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 57:1–72, 1860

    Hermann von Helmholtz. Theorie der Luftschwingungen in Röhren mit offenen Enden.Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 57:1–72, 1860

  5. [5]

    J. W. Strutt Rayleigh.The Theory of Sound, Volume I. Macmillan, London, 2nd edition, 1894

  6. [6]

    Breit and E

    G. Breit and E. P. Wigner. Capture of slow neutrons.Physical Review, 49:519–531, 1936. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.49.519

    doi:10.1103/physrev.49.519 1936

  7. [7]

    Mechanical resonance: 300 years from discovery to the full understand- ing of its importance

    Jürgen Bleck-Neuhaus. Mechanical resonance: 300 years from discovery to the full understand- ing of its importance. Technical report, ResearchGate Preprint, 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    Going into resonance.Nature Physics, 15:203, 2019

    Mark Buchanan. Going into resonance.Nature Physics, 15:203, 2019. doi: 10.1038/ s41567-019-0458-z. 49

    2019

Show all 225 references
  1. [9]

    F. Tang, Q. Zhong, X. Zhang, Y. Zhuang, T. Zhang, X. Xu, and M. Hu. Angle-controlled nanospectrum switching from lorentzian to fano lineshapes.Nanomaterials, 14(23):1932, 2024. doi: 10.3390/nano14231932

    1932 doi

  2. [10]

    I. Tolstoy. Superresonant systems of scatterers. I.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80:282–294, 1986. doi: 10.1121/1.394185. Erratum: J. Acoust. Soc. Am.81, 1987, doi:10.1121/1.395141

    1986 doi

  3. [11]

    I. Tolstoy. Properties of superresonant systems of spherical scatterers.IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 12(2):327–332, 1987. doi: 10.1109/JOE.1987.1145264

    1987

  4. [12]

    Friedrich and D

    H. Friedrich and D. Wintgen. Interfering resonances and bound states in the continuum. Physical Review A, 32:3231–3242, 1985. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.32.3231

    1985 doi

  5. [13]

    D. C. Marinica, A. G. Borisov, and S. V. Shabanov. Bound states in the continuum in photonics. Physical Review Letters, 100:183902, 2008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.183902

    2008 doi

  6. [14]

    C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, J. Lee, S.-L. Chua, S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić. Observation of trapped light within the radiation continuum.Nature, 499:188–191, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nature12289

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić. Bound states in the continuum.Nature Reviews Materials, 1:16048, 2016. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    M. V. Rybin, K. L. Koshelev, Z. F. Sadrieva, K. B. Samusev, A. A. Bogdanov, M. F. Limonov, and Y. S. Kivshar. High-Q supercavity modes in subwavelength dielectric resonators.Physical Review Letters, 119:243901, 2017. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.243901

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    V. V. Klimov. On the existence of ‘supercavity modes’ in sub-wavelength dielectric resonators and their relation to bound states in the continuum.Physics-Uspekhi, 62(10):1058–1059, 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    M. V. Rybin and Y. Kivshar. Metaphotonics with subwavelength dielectric resonators.npj Nanophotonics, 1:43, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s44310-024-00041-6

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    A. E. Miroshnichenko, A. B. Evlyukhin, Y. F. Yu, R. M. Bakker, A. Chipouline, A. I. Kuznetsov, B. Luk’yanchuk, B. N. Chichkov, and Y. S. Kivshar. Nonradiating anapole modes in dielectric nanoparticles.Nature Communications, 6:8069, 2015. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9069

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone. Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers.Physical Review Letters, 105:053901, 2010. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.053901

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    W. Wan, Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao. Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption.Science, 331:889–892, 2011. doi: 10.1126/science.1200735

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    D. G. Baranov, A. Krasnok, T. Shegai, A. Alù, and Y. Chong. Coherent perfect absorbers: linear control of light with light.Nature Reviews Materials, 2:17064, 2017. doi: 10.1038/ natrevmats.2017.64

    2017

  15. [23]

    Malara, C

    P. Malara, C. E. Campanella, A. Giorgini, S. Avino, P. De Natale, and G. Gagliardi. Super- resonant intracavity coherent absorption.Scientific Reports, 6:28947, 2016. doi: 10.1038/ srep28947. 50

    2016

  16. [24]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher. Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry.Physical Review Letters, 80:5243–5246, 1998. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5243

    1998 doi

  17. [25]

    W. Chen, Ş. K. Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang. Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity.Nature, 548:192–196, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nature23281

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan. Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points.Nature, 548: 187–191, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nature23280

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alù. Exceptional points in optics and photonics.Science, 363:eaar7709,

  20. [28]

    Y. V. Gulyav, O. S. Sukhorukova, A. S. Tarasenko, S. V. Tarasenko, and V. G. Shavrov. ‘superresonant’ states in the spectrum of leaky surface magnon polarons.Doklady Physics, 67 (4):97–102, 2022. [Translation of Doklady RAN. Fizika505, 10–15 (2022)]

    2022

  21. [29]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, N. Zhu, F. Marquardt, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang. Magnon dark modes and gradient memory.Nature Communications, 6:8914, 2015. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9914

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    Wan, T.-Y

    X.-S. Wan, T.-Y. Huang, and K. A. Innanen. The 1:1 superresonance in Pluto’s motion. Astronomical Journal, 121:1155–1162, 2001. doi: 10.1086/318745

    2001 doi

  23. [31]

    R. H. Dicke. Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes.Physical Review, 93:99–110, 1954. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.93.99

    1954 doi

  24. [32]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche. Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission.Physics Reports, 93:301–396, 1982. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(82)90102-8

    1982 doi

  25. [33]

    Ruan and S

    Z. Ruan and S. Fan. Superscattering of light from subwavelength nanostructures.Physical Review Letters, 105:013901, 2010. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.013901

    2010 doi

  26. [34]

    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky. Floating orbits, superradiant scattering and the black-hole bomb.Nature, 238:211–212, 1972. doi: 10.1038/238211a0

    1972 doi

  27. [35]

    J. D. Bekenstein. Extraction of energy and charge from a black hole.Physical Review D, 7: 949–953, 1973

    1973

  28. [36]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani.Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, volume 971 ofLecture Notes in Physics. Springer, 2nd edition, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46622-0

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Z. Wan, B. Luk’yanchuk, L. Yue, B. Yan, J. Monks, R. Dhama, O. V. Minin, I. V. Minin, S. Huang, and A. A. Fedyanin. High order Fano resonances and giant magnetic fields in dielectric microspheres.Scientific Reports, 9:20293, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56783-3

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    I. V. Minin and O. V. Minin. The superresonance: The discovery that was not done more than one hundred years ago.Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, 37(3):293–301, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Babushkin, L

    I. Babushkin, L. Shi, A. Demircan, U. Morgner, J. Herrmann, and A. Husakou. Metallic nanostructures as electronic billiards for nonlinear terahertz photonics.Physical Review Research, 5(4):043151, 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043151. 51

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Narimanov and E

    E. Narimanov and E. A. Demler. Hyperbolic quantum processor, 2024. Conference version: Proc. SPIE, doi:10.1117/12.3067425

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    S. I. Azzam and A. V. Kildishev. Photonic bound states in the continuum: from basics to applications.Advanced Optical Materials, 9:2001469, 2021. doi: 10.1002/adom.202001469

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar. Fano resonances in photonics. Nature Photonics, 11:543–554, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.142

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar. Fano resonances in nanoscale structures. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82:2257–2298, 2010. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2257

    2010 doi

  36. [44]

    M. V. Rybin and M. F. Limonov. Resonance effects in photonic crystals and metamaterials [Russian original article].Physics-Uspekhi, 62:823–838, 2019. [Translation of UFN189, 881–892 (2019)]

    2019

  37. [45]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori. Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter.Nature Reviews Physics, 1:19–40, 2019. doi: 10.1038/ s42254-018-0006-2

    2019

  38. [46]

    Forn-Díaz, L

    P. Forn-Díaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano. Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction.Reviews of Modern Physics, 91:025005, 2019. doi: 10.1103/ RevModPhys.91.025005

    2019

  39. [47]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides. Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry.Nature Physics, 14:11–19, 2018. doi: 10.1038/nphys4323

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang. Parity-time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics.Nature Materials, 18:783–798, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0304-9

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    C. D. Murray and S. F. Dermott.Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 1999

    1999

  42. [50]

    I. V. Minin, O. V. Minin, S. Zhou, and B. Luk’yanchuk. High order Fano resonance in the time domain for a freezing water microdroplet.Scientific Reports, 14:24118, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74425-1

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    O. V. Minin, S. Zhou, and I. V. Minin. Optical super-resonances in mesoscale dielectric cenosphere: giant magnetic field generations.Annalen der Physik, 535(12):2300337, 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    I. V. Minin, O. V. Minin, Y. H. Cao, B. Yan, B. Wan, and B. Luk’yanchuk. Photonic lenses with whispering gallery waves at Janus particles.Opto-Electronic Science, 1:210008, 2022. doi: 10.29026/oes.2022.210008

    2022

  45. [53]

    Y. E. Geints, I. V. Minin, and O. V. Minin. Magnetic whispering-gallery super-resonance. Optics Communications, 554:130149, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    L. Yue, Z. Wan, B. Yan, J. Monks, Y. Joya, R. Dhama, O. V. Minin, and I. V. Minin. Super-enhancement focusing of Teflon spheres.Annalen der Physik, 532(10):2000373, 2020. 52

    2020

  47. [55]

    L. Yue, B. Yan, J. Monks, R. Dhama, C. Jiang, O. V. Minin, I. V. Minin, and Z. Wan. Full three-dimensional Poynting vector flow analysis of great field-intensity enhancement in specifically sized spherical particles.Scientific Reports, 9:20224, 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    I. V. Minin, O. V. Minin, and S. Zhou. High-order Fano resonance in a mesoscale dielectric sphere with a low refractive index.JETP Letters, 116(3):146–150, 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    I. V. Minin, O. V. Minin, and S. Zhou. Features of the generation of extreme electromagnetic fields in a mesoscale dielectric sphere with regard to the environment.Technical Physics Letters, 48(18):41–44, 2022

    2022

  50. [58]

    Minin I. V. and O. V. Minin. Mesotronics: Some new, unusual optical effects.Photonics, 9: 762, 20224. doi: 10.3390/photonics9100762

    doi

  51. [59]

    U. Fano. Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts.Physical Review, 124:1866–1878, 1961. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1866

    1961 doi

  52. [60]

    L.-S. Fu, N. Cui, F. Zhang, J.-S. Wang, A. Qiu, B.-L. Guan, and A.-Q. Liu. Subwavelength- grating coupled-cavity resonance VCSELs with ultra-narrow linewidth.APL Photonics, 10(5): 056112, 2025. doi: 10.1063/5.0254855

    2025 doi

  53. [61]

    K. L. Tsakmakidis, L. Shen, S. A. Schulz, X. Zheng, J. Upham, X. Deng, H. Altug, A. F. Vakakis, and R. W. Boyd. Breaking Lorentz reciprocity to overcome the time-bandwidth limit in physics and engineering.Science, 356(6344):1260–1264, 2017. doi: 10.1126/science.aam6662

    2017 doi

  54. [62]

    S. A. Mann, D. L. Sounas, and A. Alù. Nonreciprocal cavities and the time–bandwidth limit. Optica, 6(1):104–110, 2019. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.6.000104

    2019 doi

  55. [63]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, and Y. Kivshar. Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum.Physical Review Letters, 121:193903, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    J.-Q. Yuan, B. Zhao, L.-S. Sun, L.-T. Wu, T.-J. Guo, M. Kang, and J. Chen. Optical super- resonance in a customized PT-symmetric system of hybrid interaction.Optics Express, 29: 24663–24673, 2021

    2021

  57. [65]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto. Topological photonics.Reviews of Modern Physics, 91:015006, 2019. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015006

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić. Topological photonics.Nature Photonics, 8: 821–829, 2014. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.248

    2014 doi

  59. [67]

    Harari, M

    G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, Y. Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y. D. Chong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Segev. Topological insulator laser: theory.Science, 359:eaar4003,

  60. [68]

    Liberal, I

    I. Liberal, I. Ederra, R. Gonzalo, and R. W. Ziolkowski. Magnetic dipole super-resonances and their impact on mechanical forces at optical frequencies.Optics Express, 22:8640–8653,

  61. [69]

    J. A. Gordon and R. W. Ziolkowski. The design and simulated performance of a coated nano-particle laser.Optics Express, 15:2622–2653, 2007. doi: 10.1364/OE.15.002622

    2007 doi

  62. [70]

    O. V. Minin, I. V. Minin, and S. Zhou. Superresonance effect in a borosilicate glass micron sphere in the optical range.Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing, 58(5): 98–104, 2022

    2022

  63. [71]

    K. J. Vahala. Optical microcavities.Nature, 424:839–846, 2003. doi: 10.1038/nature01939

    2003 doi

  64. [72]

    D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala. Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip.Nature, 421:925–928, 2003. doi: 10.1038/nature01371

    2003 doi

  65. [73]

    S. M. Spillane, T. J. Kippenberg, and K. J. Vahala. Ultralow-threshold Raman laser using a spherical dielectric microcavity.Nature, 415:621–623, 2002. doi: 10.1038/415621a

    2002 doi

  66. [74]

    A. B. Matsko and V. S. Ilchenko. Optical resonators with whispering-gallery modes – Part I: basics.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 12:3–14, 2006. doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2005.862952

    2006

  67. [75]

    Scheibner, T

    M. Scheibner, T. Schmidt, L. Worschech, A. Forchel, G. Bacher, T. Passow, and D. Hommel. Superradiance of quantum dots.Nature Physics, 3:106–110, 2007. doi: 10.1038/nphys494

    2007 doi

  68. [76]

    Angerer, K

    A. Angerer, K. Streltsov, T. Astner, S. Putz, H. Sumiya, S. Onoda, J. Isoya, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, J. Schmiedmayer, and J. Majer. Superradiant emission from colour centres in diamond.Nature Physics, 14:1168–1172, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0269-7

    2018 doi

  69. [77]

    K. Cong, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, G. T. Noe II, A. Belyanin, and J. Kono. Dicke superradiance in solids [invited].Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 33:C80–C101, 2016. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.33.000C80

    2016 doi

  70. [78]

    Jordao, S

    L. Jordao, S. Chattaraj, Q. Huang, S. Lu, J. Zhang, and A. Madhukar. Single photon super- radiance enhanced light-matter interaction in spatially ordered shape and volume controlled single quantum dots.Nanophotonics, 14(19):3157–3168, 2025. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2025-0270

    2025 doi

  71. [79]

    M. N. Harakeh and A. van der Woude.Giant Resonances: Fundamental High-Frequency Modes of Nuclear Excitation. Oxford University Press, 2001

    2001

  72. [80]

    P. F. Bortignon, A. Bracco, and R. A. Broglia.Giant Resonances: Nuclear Structure at Finite Temperature. Contemporary Concepts in Physics. CRC Press, 1998

    1998

  73. [81]

    B. S. Ishkhanov and N. P. Yudin. Giant resonances in atomic nuclei.Physics of Particles and Nuclei, 31(2):313–349, 2000

    2000

  74. [82]

    Savran, T

    D. Savran, T. Aumann, and A. Zilges. Experimental studies of the pygmy dipole resonance. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 70:210–245, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.02.003

    2013 doi

  75. [83]

    R. Barnes. Laplace resonance. In M. Gargaud, editor,Encyclopedia of Astrobiology, pages 905–906. Springer, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-11274-4_864

    2011 doi

  76. [84]

    Paita, A

    F. Paita, A. Celletti, and G. Pucacco. Element history of the Laplace resonance: a dynamical approach.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 617:A35, 2018. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832856. 54

    2018 doi

  77. [85]

    Goldreich

    P. Goldreich. An explanation of the frequent occurrence of commensurable mean motions in the solar system.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 130:159–181, 1965. doi: 10.1093/mnras/130.3.159

    1965 doi

  78. [86]

    A. P. Bovsunovskii, C. Surace, and O. A. Bovsunovskii. The effect of damping and force appli- cation point on the non-linear dynamic behavior of a cracked beam at sub- and superresonance vibrations.Strength of Materials, 38:492–497, 2006. doi: 10.1007/s11223-006-0068-8

    2006 doi

  79. [87]

    O. Gat, M. Lein, and S. Teufel. Resonance phenomena in the interaction of a many-photon wave packet and a qubit.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46:315301, 2013

    2013

  80. [88]

    I. I. Rabi, J. R. Zacharias, S. Millman, and P. Kusch. A new method of measuring nuclear magnetic moment.Physical Review, 53:318, 1938

    1938

  81. [89]

    E. M. Purcell, H. C. Torrey, and R. V. Pound. Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid.Physical Review, 69:37–38, 1946. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.69.37

    1946 doi

  82. [90]

    R. Kubo. A stochastic theory of line shape.Advances in Chemical Physics, 15:101–127, 1969

    1969

  83. [91]

    T. H. Stix.Waves in Plasmas. American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992

    1992

  84. [92]

    N. J. Fisch. Theory of current drive in plasmas.Reviews of Modern Physics, 59:175–234, 1987. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.59.175

    1987 doi

  85. [93]

    C. F. F. Karney. Stochastic ion heating by a lower hybrid wave.Physics of Fluids, 22:2188–2209, 1979

    1979

  86. [94]

    Galiffi, R

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Alù, and J. B. Pendry. Photonics of time-varying media.Advanced Photonics, 4:014002,

  87. [96]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner. Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators.Nature Reviews Physics, 2:229–244, 2020. doi: 10.1038/ s42254-020-0170-z

    2020

  88. [97]

    Ruan and S

    Z. Ruan and S. Fan. Design of subwavelength superscattering nanospheres.Applied Physics Letters, 98:043101, 2011

    2011

  89. [98]

    C. Qian, X. Lin, Y. Yang, X. Xiong, H. Wang, E. Li, I. Kaminer, B. Zhang, and H. Chen. Experimental observation of superscattering.Physical Review Letters, 122:063901, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.063901

    2019 doi

  90. [99]

    Krasnok, S

    A. Krasnok, S. Glybovski, M. Petrov, S. Makarov, R. Savelev, P. Belov, C. Simovski, and Y. Kivshar. Demonstration of the enhanced Purcell factor in all-dielectric structures.Applied Physics Letters, 108:211105, 2016. 55

    2016

  91. [100]

    Torres, S

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, E. W. Tedford, and S. Weinfurtner. Rotational superradiant scattering in a vortex flow.Nature Physics, 13:833–836, 2017. doi: 10.1038/ nphys4151

    2017

  92. [101]

    I. V. Minin and O. V. Minin. Extreme effects in field localization of acoustic wave: super- resonances in dielectric mesoscale sphere immersed in water.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 516:012042, 2019. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/516/1/012042

    2019 doi

  93. [102]

    Michavila, I

    C. Michavila, I. V. Minin, O. V. Minin, and A. Uris. Super-resonances in a dielectric mesoscale sphere immersed in water: effects in extreme field localization of acoustic wave.Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 38:070001, 2019

    2019

  94. [103]

    A. N. Norris. Scattering of elastic waves by spherical inclusions with applications to low frequency wave propagation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80:1747–1755, 1986

    1986

  95. [104]

    A. R. Harris, A. Kianfar, D. Roca, D. Yago, C. Brehm, and M. I. Hussein. Super-resonance: Breaking the bandwidth limit of resonant modes and its application to flow control.Physical Review X, 16:021045, 2026. doi: 10.1103/766t-tqsy

    2026 doi

  96. [105]

    Lee, H.-S

    T. Lee, H.-S. Kwon, X. Li, Z. Yu, T. Kimura, Y. Tadokoro, and H. Iizuka. Surface acoustic wave direction sensing enabled by resonant mode interference in a single micropillar resonator. Physical Review B, 111:174101, 2025

    2025

  97. [106]

    M. I. Hussein, M. J. Leamy, and M. Ruzzene. Dynamics of phononic materials and structures: Historical origins, recent progress, and future outlook.Applied Mechanics Reviews, 66:040802,

  98. [107]

    Williams and G

    James G. Williams and G. S. Benson. Resonances in the Neptune-Pluto system.Astronomical Journal, 76:167, 1971. doi: 10.1086/111100

    1971 doi

  99. [108]

    J. Laskar. A numerical experiment on the chaotic behaviour of the solar system.Nature, 338: 237–238, 1989. doi: 10.1038/338237a0

    1989 doi

  100. [109]

    A. S. Smirnov and B. A. Smolnikov. Double pendulum research history.History of Science and Engineering, (12):3–12, 2020

    2020

  101. [110]

    R. Kobes. Superresonance effect and energy flow in acoustic black holes.Canadian Journal of Physics, 84(6–7), 2006

    2006

  102. [111]

    doi: 10.1115/1.4026911

    doi

  103. [112]

    J. I. McDonald and S. A. R. Ellis. Resonant conversion of gravitational waves in neutron star magnetospheres.Physical Review D, 110:103003, 2024

    2024

  104. [113]

    K. S. Thorne.Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein’s Outrageous Legacy. Norton, New York, 1994

    1994

  105. [114]

    M. A. Anacleto, F. A. Brito, and E. Passos. Noncommutative analogue Aharonov-Bohm effect and superresonance.Physical Review D, 87:125015, 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.125015. 56

    2013 doi

  106. [115]

    A. A. Bogdanov, K. L. Koshelev, P. V. Kapitanova, M. V. Rybin, S. A. Gladyshev, Z. F. Sadrieva, K. B. Samusev, Y. S. Kivshar, and M. F. Limonov. Bound states in the continuum and Fano resonances in the strong mode coupling regime.Advanced Photonics, 1:016001, 2019

    2019

  107. [116]

    Basak and P

    S. Basak and P. Majumdar. ‘superresonance’ from a rotating acoustic black hole.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 20:3907, 2003. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/20/18/304

    2003 doi

  108. [117]

    Z. F. Sadrieva, I. S. Sinev, K. L. Koshelev, A. Samusev, I. V. Iorsh, O. Takayama, R. Malureanu, A. A. Bogdanov, and A. V. Lavrinenko. Transition from optical bound states in the continuum to leaky resonances: role of substrate and roughness.ACS Photonics, 4:723–727, 2017

    2017

  109. [118]

    K. V. Baryshnikova, D. A. Smirnova, B. S. Luk’yanchuk, and Y. S. Kivshar. Optical anapoles: concepts and applications.Advanced Optical Materials, 7:1801350, 2019

    2019

  110. [119]

    Savinov, N

    V. Savinov, N. Papasimakis, D. P. Tsai, and N. I. Zheludev. Optical anapoles.Communications Physics, 2:69, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s42005-019-0167-z

    2019 doi

  111. [120]

    Lukosiunas, L

    I. Lukosiunas, L. Grineviciute, J. Nikitina, D. Gailevicius, and K. Staliunas. Extremely narrow, sharp-peaked resonances at the edge of the continuum.Physical Review A, 107:L061501, 2023

    2023

  112. [121]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Kruk, E. Melik-Gaykazyan, J.-H. Choi, A. Bogdanov, H.-G. Park, and Y. Kivshar. Subwavelength dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics.Science, 367: 288–292, 2020. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz3985

    2020 doi

  113. [122]

    J. B. Lassiter, H. Sobhani, J. A. Fan, J. Kundu, F. Capasso, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas. Fano resonances in plasmonic nanoclusters: geometrical and chemical tunability.Nano Letters, 10:3184–3189, 2010

    2010

  114. [123]

    M. I. Stockman. Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future.Optics Express, 19: 22029–22106, 2011. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.022029

    2011 doi

  115. [124]

    J. B. Khurgin. How to deal with the loss in plasmonics and metamaterials.Nature Nanotech- nology, 10:2–6, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.310

    2015 doi

  116. [125]

    Akahane, T

    Y. Akahane, T. Asano, B.-S. Song, and S. Noda. High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two- dimensional photonic crystal.Nature, 425:944–947, 2003. doi: 10.1038/nature02063

    2003 doi

  117. [126]

    Luk’yanchuk, N

    B. Luk’yanchuk, N. I. Zheludev, S. A. Maier, N. J. Halas, P. Nordlander, H. Giessen, and C. T. Chong. The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials.Nature Materials, 9:707–715, 2010. doi: 10.1038/nmat2810

    2010 doi

  118. [127]

    R. J. Thompson, G. Rempe, and H. J. Kimble. Observation of normal-mode splitting for an atom in an optical cavity.Physical Review Letters, 68:1132–1135, 1992. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.68.1132

    1992

  119. [128]

    J. P. Reithmaier, G. S¸ ek, A. Löffler, C. Hofmann, S. Kuhn, S. Reitzenstein, L. V. Keldysh, V. D. Kulakovskii, T. L. Reinecke, and A. Forchel. Strong coupling in a single quantum dot-semiconductor microcavity system.Nature, 432:197–200, 2004. doi: 10.1038/nature02969

    2004 doi

  120. [129]

    Walther, B

    H. Walther, B. T. H. Varcoe, B.-G. Englert, and T. Becker. Cavity quantum electrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics, 69:1325–1382, 2006. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/5/R02. 57

    2006 doi

  121. [130]

    Englund, A

    D. Englund, A. Faraon, I. Fushman, N. Stoltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vučković. Controlling cavity reflectivity with a single quantum dot.Nature, 450:857–861, 2007. doi: 10.1038/nature06234

    2007 doi

  122. [131]

    Sekoguchi, Y

    H. Sekoguchi, Y. Takahashi, T. Asano, and S. Noda. Photonic crystal nanocavity with a Q-factor of∼9 million.Optics Express, 22:916–924, 2014. doi: 10.1364/OE.22.000916

    2014 doi

  123. [132]

    Larson, T

    J. Larson, T. Mavrogordatos, S. Parkins, and A. Vidiella-Barranco. The Jaynes–Cummings model: 60 years andstill counting.Journal of the Optical Society of America B,41:JCM1–JCM4, 2024

    2024

  124. [133]

    Lecamp, P

    G. Lecamp, P. Lalanne, and J. P. Hugonin. Very large spontaneous-emissionβ-factors in photonic-crystal waveguides.Physical Review Letters, 99:023902, 2007

    2007

  125. [134]

    Meiser, J

    D. Meiser, J. Ye, D. R. Carlson, and M. J. Holland. Prospects for a millihertz-linewidth laser. Physical Review Letters, 102:163601, 2009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.163601

    2009 doi

  126. [135]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifenstein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein. High cooperativity in coupled microwave resonator ferrimagnetic insulator hybrids.Physical Review Letters, 111:127003, 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.127003

    2013 doi

  127. [136]

    E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings. Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser.Proceedings of the IEEE, 51:89–109, 1963. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1963.1664

    1963

  128. [137]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura. Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit.Physical Review Letters, 113:083603, 2014

    2014

  129. [138]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang. Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons.Physical Review Letters, 113:156401, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.156401

    2014 doi

  130. [139]

    Ö. O. Soykal and M. E. Flatté. Strong field interactions between a nanomagnet and a photonic cavity.Physical Review Letters, 104:077202, 2010. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.077202

    2010 doi

  131. [140]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, and Y. Nakamura. Resolving quanta of collective spin excitations in a millimeter-sized ferromagnet. Science Advances, 3:e1603150, 2017. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1603150

    2017 doi

  132. [141]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura. Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics.Applied Physics Express, 12:070101, 2019. doi: 10.7567/ 1882-0786/ab248d

    2019

  133. [142]

    B. Z. Rameshti, S. V. Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter. Cavity magnonics.Physics Reports, 979:1–61, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.06.001

    2022 doi

  134. [143]

    H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan. Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science.Physics Reports, 965:1–74, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.03.002. 58

    2022 doi

  135. [144]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands. Magnon spintronics.Nature Physics, 11:453–461, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nphys3347

    2015 doi

  136. [145]

    C. Kittel. On the theory of ferromagnetic resonance absorption.Physical Review, 73:155–161,

  137. [146]

    Lachance-Quirion, S

    D. Lachance-Quirion, S. P. Wolski, Y. Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura. Entanglement-based single-shot detection of a single magnon with a superconducting qubit. Science, 367:425–428, 2020. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz9236

    2020 doi

  138. [147]

    T. M. O’Neil. Collisionless damping of nonlinear plasma oscillations.Physics of Fluids, 8: 2255–2262, 1965. doi: 10.1063/1.1761193

    1965 doi

  139. [148]

    P. T. Bonoli. Review of recent experimental and modeling progress in the lower hybrid range of frequencies at megawatt power levels on Alcator C-Mod.Physics of Plasmas, 21:061508,

  140. [149]

    R. Prater. Heating and current drive by electron cyclotron waves.Physics of Plasmas, 11: 2349–2376, 2004. doi: 10.1063/1.1690762

    2004 doi

  141. [150]

    Brambilla.Kinetic Theory of Plasma Waves: Homogeneous Plasmas

    M. Brambilla.Kinetic Theory of Plasma Waves: Homogeneous Plasmas. Oxford University Press, 1998

    1998

  142. [151]

    N. J. Fisch and J.-M. Rax. Interaction of energetic alpha particles with intense lower hybrid waves.Physical Review Letters, 69:612–615, 1992. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.612

    1992 doi

  143. [152]

    L. D. Landau. On the vibrations of the electronic plasma.Journal of Physics USSR, 10:25–34, 1946

    1946

  144. [153]

    Aasi and others (LIGO Scientific Collaboration)

    J. Aasi and others (LIGO Scientific Collaboration). Advanced LIGO.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32:074001, 2015. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001

    2015 doi

  145. [154]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Physical Review Letters, 116:061102, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    2016 doi

  146. [155]

    doi: 10.1063/1.4884360

    doi

  147. [156]

    E. M. Purcell. Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies.Physical Review, 69: 681, 1946. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.69.674.2

    1946 doi

  148. [157]

    T. X. Hoang, H.-S. Chu, F. J. García-Vidal, and C. E. Png. High-performance dielectric nano-cavities for near- and mid-infrared frequency applications.Journal of Optics, 24(9): 094006, 2022. doi: 10.1088/2040-8986/ac868d

    2022 doi

  149. [158]

    Feshbach

    H. Feshbach. Unified theory of nuclear reactions.Annals of Physics, 5(4):357–390, 1958. doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(58)90007-1

    1958 doi

  150. [159]

    Wesson.Tokamaks

    J. Wesson.Tokamaks. Oxford University Press, 4th edition, 2011

    2011

  151. [160]

    M. A. Selim and M. Anwar. Enhanced Q-factor and effective length silicon photonics filter utilizing nested ring resonators.Journal of Optics, 25(11):115802, 2023. doi: 10.1088/ 2040-8986/acf5fd

    2023

  152. [161]

    Y. H. Li, Y. Q. Fu, O. V. Minin, and I. V. Minin. Ultra-sharp nanofocusing of graded index photonic crystal-based lenses perforated with optimized single defect.Optical Materials Express, 6(8):2628–2636, 2016. doi: 10.1364/OME.6.002628

    2016 doi

  153. [162]

    R. W. P. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski, J. Hough, G. M. Ford, A. J. Munley, and H. Ward. Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator.Applied Physics B, 31: 97–105, 1983

    1983

  154. [163]

    B. Guo, Y. Huang, A. Røstad, and G. Schuster. Far-field super-resolution imaging of resonant multiples.Science Advances, 2(5):e1501439, 2016. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501439

    2016 doi

  155. [164]

    I. V. Minin and O. V. Minin. The breakup of gas bubbles by a shock wave: brief historical background.Eur. Phys. J. H, 49(5), 2024. doi: 10.1140/epjh/s13129-024-00071-w

    2024 doi

  156. [165]

    Minnaert

    M. Minnaert. On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water.The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 16(104):235–248, 1933. doi: 10.1080/14786443309462277

    1933 doi

  157. [166]

    Munsch, A

    M. Munsch, A. Mosset, A. Auffèves, S. Seidelin, J.-P. Poizat, J.-M. Gérard, A. Lemaître, I. Sagnes, and P. Senellart. Continuous-wave versus time-resolved measurements of Purcell factors for quantum dots in semiconductor microcavities.Physical Review B, 80:115312, 2009. doi: 1...

    2009 doi

  158. [167]

    Z. Liu, X. Zhang, Y. Mao, Y. Y. Zhu, Z. Yang, C. T. Chan, and P. Sheng. Locally resonant sonic materials.Science, 289:1734–1736, 2000. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1734

  159. [168]

    S. A. Cummer, J. Christensen, and A. Alù. Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nature Reviews Materials, 1:16001, 2016. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.1

    2016 doi

  160. [169]

    Feasibilityofresonantmetalensforthesubwavelengthimagingusinga single sensor in the far field.Optics Express, 22:18688–18697, 2014

    L.Li, F.Li, andT.J.Cui. Feasibilityofresonantmetalensforthesubwavelengthimagingusinga single sensor in the far field.Optics Express, 22:18688–18697, 2014. doi: 10.1364/OE.22.018688

    2014 doi

  161. [170]

    A. A. Maznev and O. B. Wright. Upholding the diffraction limit in the focusing of light and sound.Wave Motion, 68:182–189, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2016.09.012

    2017 doi

  162. [171]

    I. I. Didenkulova, I. F. Nikolkina, and E. N. Pelinovsky. Resonant amplification of tsunami waves generated by an underwater landslide.Doklady Earth Sciences, 436(1):66–69, 2011. doi: 10.1134/S1028334X11010028

    2011 doi

  163. [172]

    Y. Wang, N. Zamora, M. Quiroz, K. Satake, and R. Cienfuegos. Tsunami resonance characteri- zation in Japan due to trans-Pacific sources: response on the bay and continental shelf.Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 126(6):e2020JC017037, 2021. doi: 10.1029/2020JC017037

    2021 doi

  164. [173]

    M. A. Margulis. Sonoluminescence.Physics-Uspekhi, 43(3):259–282, 2000. doi: 10.1070/ PU2000v043n03ABEH000455

    2000

  165. [174]

    G. Mie. Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen.Annalen der Physik, 330:377–445, 1908. doi: 10.1002/andp.19083300302. 60

    1908 doi

  166. [175]

    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman.Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. Wiley, 1983

    1983

  167. [176]

    Ma and P

    G. Ma and P. Sheng. Acoustic metamaterials: From local resonances to broad horizons.Science Advances, 2:e1501595, 2016. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501595

    2016 doi

  168. [177]

    O. V. Minin and I. V. Minin. Confirmation of the generation of strong magnetic fields in a dielectric sphere with a high refractive index in the microwave range.Technical Physics Letters, 52(1):29–32, 2026. doi: 10.61011/TPL.2026.01.62814.20412

    2026

  169. [178]

    A multi-mode super-Fano mechanism for enhanced third harmonic generation in silicon metasurfaces.Light: Science & Applications, 12:97, 2023

    David Hähnel, Christian Golla, Maximilian Albert, Thomas Zentgraf, Viktor Myroshnychenko, Jens Förstner, and Cedrik Meier. A multi-mode super-Fano mechanism for enhanced third harmonic generation in silicon metasurfaces.Light: Science & Applications, 12:97, 2023. doi: 10.1038/...

    2023 doi

  170. [179]

    I. V. Minin and O. V. Minin. Diffractive optics and nanophotonics: resolution below the diffraction limit.Springer Briefs in Physics, 2016

    2016

  171. [180]

    H. Tang, Z. Shi, Y. Zhang, R. Li, B. Wei, S. Gong, I. V. Minin, and O. V. Minin. Unusual optical phenomena inside and near a rotating sphere: the photonic hook and resonance.Optics Express, 32(7):12950, 2024. doi: 10.1364/OE.518794

    2024 doi

  172. [181]

    H. K. Gandhi and S. Ghosh. Ultra-high sensitivity near multiple bound states in the continuum in microcavity resonators. In14th Pacific Rim Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO PR 2020), page P4_7. Optica Publishing Group, 2020. doi: 10.1364/CLEOPR.2020.P4_7

    2020 doi

  173. [182]

    Canós Valero, H

    A. Canós Valero, H. K. Shamkhi, A. S. Kupriianov, T. Weiss, A. A. Pavlov, D. Redka, V. Bobrovs, Y. Kivshar, and A. S. Shalin. Superscattering emerging from the physics of bound states in the continuum.Nature Communications, 14(1):4689, 2023. doi: 10.1038/ s41467-023-40382-y

    2023

  174. [183]

    B. S. Luk’yanchuk, L. M. Vasilyak, V. Ya. Pecherkin, S. P. Vetchinin, V. E. Fortov, Z. B. Wang, R. Paniagua-Domínguez, and A. A. Fedyanin. Colossal magnetic fields in high refractive index materials at microwave frequencies.Scientific Reports, 11:23453, 2021. doi: 10.1038/ s41...

    2021

  175. [184]

    D. G. Baranov, D. A. Zuev, S. I. Lepeshov, O. V. Kotov, A. E. Krasnok, A. B. Evlyukhin, and B. N. Chichkov. All-dielectric nanophotonics: the quest for better materials and fabrication techniques.Optica, 4:814–825, 2017. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000814

    2017 doi

  176. [185]

    Y. Kivshar. All-dielectric meta-optics and non-linear nanophotonics.National Science Review, 5:144–158, 2018. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwy017

    2018 doi

  177. [186]

    A. I. Barreda, H. Saleh, A. Litman, F. González, J.-M. Geffrin, and F. Moreno. Applications of hybrid metal-dielectric nanostructures: state of the art.Nanophotonics, 8:1737–1768, 2019

    2019

  178. [187]

    Chył ek, J

    P. Chył ek, J. D. Pendleton, and R. G. Pinnick. Internal and near-surface scattered field of a spherical particle at resonant conditions.Applied Optics, 24(23):3940–3942, 1985

    1985

  179. [188]

    Vaskin, J

    A. Vaskin, J. Bohn, K. E. Chong, T. Bucher, M. Zilk, D.-Y. Choi, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, T. Pertsch, and I. Staude. Directional and spectral shaping of light emission with Mie-resonant silicon nanoantenna arrays.ACS Photonics, 5(4):1359–1364, 2018. doi: 10.1021/acsphotoni...

    2018 doi

  180. [189]

    Koshelev and Y

    K. Koshelev and Y. Kivshar. Dielectric resonant metaphotonics.ACS Photonics, 8:102–112,

  181. [190]

    A. I. Kuznetsov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, M. L. Brongersma, Y. S. Kivshar, and B. Luk’yanchuk. Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures.Science, 354:aag2472, 2016. doi: 10.1126/science. aag2472

    2016 doi

  182. [191]

    Z. Wang, L. Chen, X. Li, T. Lang, X. Jing, and Z. Hong. Analogue of electromagnetically- induced transparency with ultra-narrow bandwidth in a silicon terahertz metasurface.Optical Materials Express, 11(7):1943–1952, 2021. doi: 10.1364/OME.427588

    1943 doi

  183. [192]

    X. Zhou, M. Yuan, S. Qin, H. Xiao, Y. Jiang, J. Yang, T. G. Nguyen, G. Ren, A. Mitchell, and Y. Tian. Tunable Fano and EIT-like resonances based on two cascaded micro-ring resonators. Optics Letters, 50:2719–2722, 2025. doi: 10.1364/OL.549345

    2025 doi

  184. [193]

    Vollmer and S

    F. Vollmer and S. Arnold. Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: label-free detection down to single molecules.Nature Methods, 5:591–596, 2008. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1221

    2008 doi

  185. [194]

    Decker, I

    M. Decker, I. Staude, M. Falkner, J. Dominguez, D. N. Neshev, I. Brener, T. Pertsch, and Y. S. Kivshar. High-efficiency dielectric Huygens’ surfaces.Advanced Optical Materials, 3: 813–820, 2015. doi: 10.1002/adom.201400584. 61

    2015 doi

  186. [195]

    Kerker, D.-S

    M. Kerker, D.-S. Wang, and C. L. Giles. Electromagnetic scattering by magnetic spheres. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 73:765–767, 1983. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.73.000765

    1983 doi

  187. [196]

    Alaee, A

    R. Alaee, A. Safari, V. Sandoghdar, and R. W. Boyd. Kerker effect, superscattering, and scattering dark states in atomic antennas.Physical Review Research, 2:043409, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043409

    2020 doi

  188. [197]

    Langbein

    W. Langbein. No exceptional precision of exceptional-point sensors.Physical Review A, 98(2): 023805, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.023805

    2018 doi

  189. [198]

    Ultra sharp Fano resonances induced by coupling between plasmonic stub and circular cavity resonators.Plasmonics, 11(4): 1157–1162, 2016

    Binfeng Yun, Ruohu Zhang, Guohua Hu, and Yeping Cui. Ultra sharp Fano resonances induced by coupling between plasmonic stub and circular cavity resonators.Plasmonics, 11(4): 1157–1162, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s11468-015-0154-5

    2016 doi

  190. [199]

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu. Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry.Physical Review Letters, 100:013904,

  191. [200]

    Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić. Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states.Nature, 461:772–775, 2009. doi: 10.1038/nature08293

    2009 doi

  192. [201]

    A. B. Khanikaev, S. H. Mousavi, W.-K. Tse, M. Kargarian, A. H. MacDonald, and G. Shvets. Photonic topological insulators.Nature Materials, 12:233–239, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nmat3520. 62

    2013 doi

  193. [202]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade.Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2nd edition, 2008

    2008

  194. [203]

    Topological Fano resonances.Physical Review Letters, 122:014301, 2019

    Farzad Zangeneh-Nejad and Romain Fleury. Topological Fano resonances.Physical Review Letters, 122:014301, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.014301

    2019 doi

  195. [204]

    M. A. Bandres, S. Wittek, G. Harari, M. Parto, J. Ren, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan. Topological insulator laser: experiments.Science, 359:eaar4005, 2018. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4005

    2018 doi

  196. [205]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst. Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems.Reviews of Modern Physics, 93:015005, 2021. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015005

    2021 doi

  197. [206]

    Lau and A

    H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk. Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing.Nature Communications, 9:4320, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06477-7

    2018 doi

  198. [207]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski. Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quantum wells.Nature Physics, 7:490–495, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nphys1926

    2011 doi

  199. [208]

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Szameit. Photonic Floquet topological insulators.Nature, 496:196–200, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nature12066

    2013 doi

  200. [209]

    Lustig, Y

    E. Lustig, Y. Plotnik, Z. Wang, G. Pyrialakos, M. Khajavikhan, and M. Segev. Topological aspects of photonic time crystals.Optica, 5:1390–1395, 2018. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.5.001390

    2018 doi

  201. [210]

    S. O. Demokritov, V. E. Demidov, O. Dzyapko, G. A. Melkov, A. A. Serga, B. Hillebrands, and A. N. Slavin. Bose–Einstein condensation of quasi-equilibrium magnons at room temperature under pumping.Nature, 443:430–433, 2006. doi: 10.1038/nature05117

    2006 doi

  202. [211]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. M. Taylor. Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics.Nature Photonics, 7:1001–1005, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.274

    2013 doi

  203. [212]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt. Cavity optomechanics.Reviews of Modern Physics, 86:1391–1452, 2014. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391

    2014 doi

  204. [213]

    I. V. Minin and O. V. Minin. Experimental demonstration of the microprocessing of the polystyrene surface using a photonic hook.JEPT Letters, 120:146–150, 2024. doi: 10.1134/ S002136402460174X

    2024

  205. [214]

    M. Tse, H. Yu, N. Kijbunchoo, A. Fernandez-Galiana, P. Dupej, L. Barsotti, et al. Quantum- enhanced Advanced LIGO detectors in the era of gravitational-wave astronomy.Physical Review Letters, 123:231107, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.231107

    2019 doi

  206. [215]

    Mittal, E

    S. Mittal, E. A. Goldschmidt, and M. Hafezi. A topological source of quantum light.Nature, 561:502–506, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0478-3

    2018 doi

  207. [216]

    Balser and C

    M. Balser and C. A. Wagner. Observations of earth–ionosphere cavity resonances.Nature, 188:638–641, 1960. doi: 10.1038/188638a0. 63

    1960 doi

  208. [217]

    B. P. Besser. Synopsis of the historical development of Schumann resonances.Radio Science, 42:RS2S02, 2007. doi: 10.1029/2006RS003495. 64

    2007 doi

  209. [220]

    T. J. Kippenberg and K. J. Vahala. Cavity optomechanics: back-action at the mesoscale. Science, 321:1172–1176, 2008. doi: 10.1126/science.1156032

    2008 doi

  210. [224]

    W. O. Schumann. Über die strahlungslosen eigenschwingungen einer leitenden kugel, die von einer luftschicht und einer ionosphärenhülle umgeben ist.Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, 7 (2):149–154, 1952. doi: 10.1515/zna-1952-0202

    1952 doi

  211. [1948]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.73.155

    doi

  212. [2008]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013904

    doi

  213. [2014]

    doi: 10.1364/OE.22.008640. 53

    doi

  214. [2018]

    doi: 10.1126/science.aar4003

    doi

  215. [2019]

    doi: 10.1126/science.aar7709

    doi

  216. [2021]

    doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01315

    doi

  217. [2022]

    doi: 10.1117/1.AP.4.1.014002

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.