REVIEW 1 cited by
Cosmological parameter inference from galaxy clustering: The effect of the posterior distribution of the power spectrum
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider the shape of the posterior distribution to be used when fitting cosmological models to power spectra measured from galaxy surveys. At very large scales, Gaussian posterior distributions in the power do not approximate the posterior distribution $\mathcal{P}_R$ we expect for a Gaussian density field $\delta_k$, even if we vary the covariance matrix according to the model to be tested. We compare alternative posterior distributions with $\mathcal{P}_R$, both mode-by-mode and in terms of expected measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity parameterised by $f_\mathrm{NL}$. Marginalising over a Gaussian posterior distribution $\mathcal{P}_f$ with fixed covariance matrix yields a posterior mean value of $f_\mathrm{NL}$ which, for a data set with the characteristics of Euclid, will be underestimated by $\triangle f_\mathrm{NL}=0.4$, while for the data release 9 (DR9) of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) it will be underestimated by $\triangle f_\mathrm{NL}=19.1$. Adopting a different form of the posterior function means that we do not necessarily require a different covariance matrix for each model to be tested: this dependence is absorbed into the functional form of the posterior. Thus, the computational burden of analysis is significantly reduced.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Super sample covariance and the volume scaling of galaxy survey covariance matrices
Covariance matrices from small-volume simulations can be rescaled to match large-volume ones at the 3% level using a new bin-centering correction, provided the large-scale power spectrum is known.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.