Higher-order derivatives of first-passage percolation with respect to the environment
Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 19:48 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The variance of the passage time in first-passage percolation equals an expression built from higher-order derivatives of the passage time with respect to the edge weights.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
When edge weights are i.i.d. and supported on the two-point set {a, b}, the passage time becomes a differentiable function of the environment. Higher-order derivatives of this function exist and satisfy the identity that the variance of the passage time equals a sum of squared or product terms involving these derivatives evaluated at the two possible weight configurations.
What carries the argument
Higher-order partial derivatives of the first-passage time function with respect to the individual edge weights under the two-point distribution.
If this is right
- The variance of the passage time admits an explicit representation without summing over all possible paths.
- The derivatives obey recursive relations and size bounds that follow from the two-point support.
- Higher moments or other statistics of the passage time may admit similar derivative expansions.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same derivative construction could be tested on models with more than two weight values by taking limits or approximations.
- The approach supplies a calculus-based route to concentration inequalities that might complement geometric arguments used in the literature.
Load-bearing premise
The edge weights must be independent and supported exactly on two values so that the passage time can be differentiated with respect to each weight while remaining a well-defined random variable.
What would settle it
A direct numerical check on a small finite grid with weights in {a, b} that computes both the variance of the passage time and the proposed derivative expression and finds they differ.
read the original abstract
We introduce and study derivatives in first-passage percolation with edge weights given by i.i.d. random variables supported on ${a,b}$. We show that the variance of the passage time can be expressed in terms of these derivatives. We further analyze their structure and establish several fundamental properties and bounds.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript introduces higher-order derivatives of the first-passage time T with respect to the edge weights in first-passage percolation on the lattice, where the weights are i.i.d. random variables supported on the two-point set {a, b}. The central claim is that Var(T) admits an exact expression in terms of these derivatives. The authors further analyze the structure of the derivatives and establish fundamental properties together with bounds.
Significance. If the main identity holds, the work supplies an exact, derivative-based formula for the variance of the passage time in a discrete-weight FPP model. This is potentially useful for fluctuation analysis, as the two-point support removes the non-differentiability obstacles that appear with continuous weights. The derivation proceeds directly from the min-plus structure of T rather than from external approximations.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The abstract states that the variance 'can be expressed in terms of these derivatives' but does not indicate the precise order of differentiation or the algebraic form of the identity; a single clarifying sentence would improve readability.
- [Introduction] Notation for the higher-order derivatives (e.g., how mixed partials with respect to distinct edges are indexed) should be introduced explicitly in the first section where they appear, to avoid ambiguity when the same symbol is reused for different orders.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the manuscript and the recommendation of minor revision. No major comments appear in the report, so we have no specific points requiring point-by-point response.
Circularity Check
Derivation self-contained from model definitions
full rationale
The paper defines higher-order derivatives of the passage time T with respect to edge weights in the two-point {a,b} environment (which removes non-differentiability issues), then derives an exact algebraic expression for Var(T) in terms of those derivatives. This follows directly from the min-over-paths structure of T and the discrete support assumption, without any reduction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or imported uniqueness results. No load-bearing step collapses to its own input by construction; the relation is a new identity obtained from the definitions.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Edge weights are i.i.d. random variables with support on {a, b}.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
var(f) = ∑_{M⊆W,M≠∅} (p(1-p))^{|M|} (E[∂_M f])^2 (Theorem 1); ∂_j ϕ = ϕ∘σ_b^j − ϕ∘σ_a^j (eq. 3)
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Higher-order environment derivatives on discrete two-point support for variance bounds
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Random coalescing geodesics in first-passage percolation
D. Ahlberg, C. Hoffman. Random coalescing geodesics in first-passage percolation, (2019) arXiv: 1609.02447
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
-
[2]
T. Alberts, K. Khanin, J. Quastel. The intermediate disorder regime for directed polymers in dimension 1+1. Ann. Probab.42(2014), 1212–1256
work page 2014
- [3]
-
[4]
S. Armstrong, P. Cardaliaguet, P. Souganidis. Error estimates and convergence rates for the stochastic ho- mogenization of Hamilton-Jacobi equations.Journal of the American Mathematical Society,27 (2), (2014) 479–540
work page 2014
-
[5]
A. Auffinger, M. Damron. A simplified proof of the relation between scaling exponents in first-passage percolation.Ann. Probab.42 (3)(2014): 1197–1211
work page 2014
-
[6]
A. Auffinger, M. Damron, J. Hanson. 50 years of first-passage percolation,Amer. Math. Soc., 2017
work page 2017
-
[7]
Y . Bakhtin, D. Dow. Differentiability of limit shapes in continuous first passage percolation models. (2024) arXiv:2406.09652
-
[8]
R. Basu, S. Ganguly, A. Sly. Upper tail large deviations in first passage percolationComm. Pure Appl. Math. 74 (8), (2021) 1577–1640
work page 2021
- [9]
-
[10]
W. Beckner. Inequalities in Fourier analysis,Ann. of Math.102(1975), 159–182
work page 1975
-
[11]
M. Bena ¨ım and R. Rossignol. Exponential concentration for first passage percolation through modified Poincar´e inequalities.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar ´e Probab. Stat.44(2008), 544–573. MR 2451057
work page 2008
-
[12]
I. Benjamini, G. Kalai, and O. Schramm, First passage percolation has sublinear distance variance,Ann. Probab.31(2003), 1970–1978
work page 2003
-
[13]
A. Bonami. Etude des coefficients de Fourier des fonctions deL p(G),Annales de l’Institut Fourier.20(2) (1970) 335–02
work page 1970
-
[14]
S. Chatterjee. The universal relation between scaling exponents in first-passage percolation.Ann. of Math. 177 (2)(2013), 663–697
work page 2013
-
[15]
S. Chatterjee. Superconcentration and related topics.Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Cham, 2014
work page 2014
-
[16]
S. Chatterjee, P.S. Dey. Multiple phase transitions in long-range first-passage percolation on square lattices. Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,69, (2016) 203–256
work page 2016
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
-
[23]
J.M. Hammersley, D.J.A. Welsh. First-passage percolation, subadditive processes, stochastic networks, and generalized renewal theory.Proc. Internat. Res. Semin., Statist. Lab., Univ. California, Berkeley, Calif, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1965, 61–110
work page 1965
-
[24]
C. Hoffman. Geodesics in first passage percolation.Ann. Appl. Probab.18 (5), (2008) 1944–1969
work page 2008
-
[25]
C.D. Howard, C.M. Newman. Euclidean models of first-passage percolationProbab. Theory Related Fields 108, (1997) 153–170
work page 1997
- [26]
-
[27]
H. Kesten. On the speed of convergence in first-passage percolation,Ann. Appl. Probab.3, (1993) 296–338
work page 1993
-
[28]
A. Krishnan, F Rassoul-Agha, T. Seppalainen. Geodesic length and shifted weights in first-passage perco- lation.Communications of the American Mathematical Society3 (05), (2023) 209–289
work page 2023
- [29]
- [30]
-
[31]
C.M. Newman, M.S.T. Piza. Divergence of shape fluctuations in two dimensions.Ann. Probab.23, (1995) 977–1005
work page 1995
-
[32]
T. Przybylowski. KKL theorem for the influence of a set of variables, (2024) arXiv: 2404.00084
-
[33]
F. Rezakhanlou, J.E. Tarver. Homogenization for stochastic Hamilton-Jacobi equations.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.,151(4), (2000) 277–309
work page 2000
-
[34]
T. Seppalainen. Existence, uniqueness and coalescence of directed planar geodesics: proof via the increment-stationary growth process.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare Probab. Stat.56 (3), (2020) 1775–1791
work page 2020
-
[35]
A. Tal. Tight bounds on the fourier spectrum of AC 0,32nd Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2017), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs),79, (2017), 15:1–15:31
work page 2017
- [36]
-
[37]
K. Tanguy. Talagrand inequality at second order and application to Boolean analysis.J Theor Probab33, (202) 692–714
- [38]
-
[39]
N. Zygouras. Directed polymers in a random environment: A review of the phase transitions.Stochastic Process. Appl.,177, (2024) 104–431 BARUCHCOLLEGE, CITYUNIVERSITY OFNEWYORK Email address:ivan.matic@baruch.cuny.edu BARUCHCOLLEGE, CITYUNIVERSITY OFNEWYORK Email address:rados.radoicic@baruch.cuny.edu BARUCHCOLLEGE, CITYUNIVERSITY OFNEWYORK Email address:d...
work page 2024
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.