Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Coherent structures and secondary flow in turbulent square duct

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.00886 v1 pith:5NC2MVWQ submitted 2019-06-03 physics.flu-dyn

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords ductflowstructuresvelocitychannelcoherentsecondaryturbulent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The aim of the present work is to investigate the role of coherent structures in the generation of the secondary flow in a turbulent square duct. The coherent structures are defined as connected regions of flow where the product of the instantaneous fluctuations of two velocity components is higher than a threshold based on the long-time turbulence statistics, in the spirit of the three-dimensional quadrant analysis proposed by Lozano-Dur\'an et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 694, 2012, pp. 100-130). We consider both the direct contribution of the structures to the mean in-plane velocity components and their geometrical properties. The instantaneous phenomena taking place in the turbulent duct are compared with turbulent channel flow at Reynolds numbers of $Re_\tau=180$ and $360$, based on friction velocity at the center-plane and channel half height. In the core region of the duct, the fractional contribution of intense events to the wall-normal component of the mean velocity is in very good agreement with that in the channel, despite the presence of the secondary flow in the former. Additionally, the shapes of the three-dimensional objects do not differ significantly in both flows. On the other hand, in the corner region of the duct, the proximity of the walls affects both the geometrical properties of the coherent structures and the contribution to the mean component of the vertical velocity, which is less relevant than that of the complementary portion of the flow not included in such objects. Our results show however that strong Reynolds shear-stress events, despite the differences observed between channel and duct, do not contribute directly to the secondary motion, and thus other phenomena need to be considered instead.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools