Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 65 references

Three-dimensional confinement of light in photonic crystals without bandgaps

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that light can be confined in all three dimensions in a photonic crystal even when there is no complete bandgap, by placing a point defect mode at a symmetry-protected quadratic degeneracy whose symmetry is incompatible wi

desk verdict A credible numerical demonstration of a genuinely new confinement mechanism, but the key symmetry-cancellation step is asserted rather than proved, so treat the analytic claim as provisional. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23281 v1 pith:5OK52MYN submitted 2026-07-25 physics.optics

Manxi Shi , Sachin Vaidya , Ali Ghorashi , Steven G. Johnson , Marin Soljačić This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.70.Qs42.60.Da
keywords photoniccrystalsboundstatesinthecontinuumquadraticdegeneracysymmetry-protectedpointdefectsqualityfactorlightconfinementdensityof
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that strong three-dimensional light confinement does not require a complete photonic bandgap. Instead, one can start with a crystal whose band structure has a symmetry-protected quadratic degeneracy, a frequency where the density of states vanishes. A point defect is tuned so its mode sits exactly at that frequency, and its symmetry representation is chosen to be incompatible with the bulk modes, so coupling to propagating channels is forbidden. The result is a mode whose field decays algebraically, roughly as one over distance to the power 2.5, which is steep enough to be normalizable, and whose quality factor grows as the system size cubed. If correct, this offers a practical route to optical cavities in three-dimensional crystals without the fabrication burden of a full gap.

What carries the argument

The central object is a symmetry-protected quadratic band degeneracy at the R point of a simple-cubic photonic crystal, where the local photonic density of states vanishes as the square root of frequency deviation. Around it sits a point defect with a singly degenerate mode tuned to the same frequency. The load-bearing mechanism is the irreducible-representation mismatch: because the defect mode and the three bulk modes belong to incompatible symmetry irreps, the coupling coefficients in the Lippmann-Schwinger expansion of the Green function vanish, removing the leading r^{-1} contribution and leaving a normalizable algebraic tail.

What would settle it

Compute the overlap coefficients c_alpha directly from numerically obtained bulk Bloch modes and the defect mode in a large supercell; if any c_alpha is nonzero, the bound-state picture fails. Alternatively, introduce a deliberately symmetry-breaking perturbation, such as making the defect slightly ellipsoidal, and measure Q versus system size: if Q stops growing as L^3 and saturates, the claimed protection is fragile and the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a point defect in a three-dimensional photonic crystal can support a true bound state at a frequency embedded in the propagating continuum, provided the bulk has an isolated quadratic degeneracy at that frequency and the defect mode transforms under an irreducible representation incompatible with the bulk modes. Under these conditions the overlap integrals between the defect and the bulk Bloch modes vanish exactly, which cancels the generic 1/r Green-function tail; the field then decays algebraically as roughly r^{-5/2}, and the mode is normalizable in three dimensions. Numerical simulations confirm the signature of a genuine bound state: the quality factor scales a

Load-bearing premise

The entire argument hinges on the claim that the overlap integrals between the defect mode and the three bulk modes at the degeneracy vanish exactly because their symmetry representations are incompatible; if even a tiny nonzero overlap survives, the generic 1/r tail returns and the mode becomes a leaky resonance whose Q saturates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sharp optical cavities can be built in three-dimensional crystals that lack a complete bandgap, relaxing fabrication constraints.
  • The quality factor of such a cavity is not intrinsically limited: it scales as L^3, so larger crystals give higher Q without changing the defect.
  • The mode is a bound state in the continuum, contradicting the intuition that a gapless environment always causes leakage.
  • The paper's catalogue of space groups that support both a multidimensional bulk irrep and a one-dimensional defect irrep provides a starting list of geometries for inverse design.
  • Confinement is achieved deterministically in ordered all-dielectric structures, without relying on momentum conservation or disorder.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-mismatch mechanism should transfer to other wave systems with quadratic band touchings, such as electronic, acoustic, or mechanical lattices, where it would produce algebraically localized bound states with analogous scaling laws.
  • Because the bound mode has no intrinsic length scale, its modal volume grows with system size alongside Q; a testable consequence is that interactions between two such cavities decay as a power law rather than exponentially.
  • The exact overlap cancellation is fragile: any fabrication disorder that lowers the defect's symmetry should restore the 1/r tail and cap the Q, a prediction that can be probed by intentionally adding a small symmetry-breaking perturbation.
  • The spherical defect shape is likely not essential; any defect that keeps the defect mode in a one-dimensional irrep incompatible with the bulk irrep should work, widening the design space.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes and tests a mechanism for three-dimensional confinement of light in a photonic crystal without a complete bandgap. A point defect is introduced into a cubic rod-based photonic crystal whose bulk band structure has a symmetry-protected quadratic degeneracy at the R point, where the density of states vanishes. By tuning the defect radius, one defect mode is brought into degeneracy with the triply degenerate bulk modes, and the defect mode is chosen to transform under a one-dimensional irrep that is incompatible with the three-dimensional irrep of the bulk modes. Supercell PWE calculations show the absence of an avoided crossing, while FDTD/harminv simulations report strong localization, algebraic field decay approximately r^{-5/2}, and quality factors scaling as Q ~ L^3 at the tuned radius, with the scaling saturating upon detuning. The paper also tabulates space groups that could support the mechanism and discusses the role of the vanishing DOS and symmetry mismatch as a type of bound state in the continuum.

Significance. If the mechanism holds, it offers a genuinely new route to 3D optical confinement without a complete bandgap, with the unusual feature of algebraic rather than exponential localization and no intrinsic length scale. The numerical evidence is strong and is accompanied by reproducible data/code (GitHub link), PWE/FDTD/harminv cross-checks, and a quantitative Q~L^3 scaling test, which is exactly the falsifiable signature of a normalizable algebraic bound state. The symmetry-based design principle and the space-group classification are useful and potentially general. The main weakness is the analytical Lippmann-Schwinger argument: the exact vanishing of the overlap integrals c_alpha between the defect mode and the bulk modes at the degeneracy is asserted rather than derived, and this cancellation is the load-bearing step that removes the non-normalizable 1/r tail. The numerical absence of an avoided crossing is suggestive but does not, by itself, establish the exact vanishing required for the bound-state claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Lippmann-Schwinger paragraph (after Fig. 3(d))] The claim that c_alpha = ∫ E*_{alpha,k0}·Δε E_d vanishes identically is the crux of the analytical argument, but it is stated without derivation. This is load-bearing: if any c_alpha were nonzero, the defect mode would inherit the non-normalizable 1/r tail and Q would not scale as L^3. Please provide a rigorous group-theoretic proof: specify the common symmetry group (the site-symmetry group of the defect, accounting for the reduction #224/#208 to #195), give the transformation properties of the three bulk Bloch modes at R and of the defect mode under that group, and use Schur orthogonality to show the integrals vanish, including the Bloch phase factors. Also clarify how the supercell ¯R-point defect Bloch mode relates to the single-defect bound state in the infinite-size limit. The numerical absence of an avoided crossing in Fig. 2(c) at one supercell size is evidence but not a proof of
  2. [Fig. 3(c) and following text] The stated algebraic decay ~r^{-5/2} is inferred from one-dimensional slices with fitted exponents -2.61 and -2.78. The theoretical argument in the text only guarantees 'at least as fast as r^{-2}', which is weaker than the numerically claimed exponent. Please clarify whether r^{-5/2} is the predicted asymptotic exponent and, if so, provide the derivation; otherwise present the Q~L^3 scaling (Fig. 3(d)) as the primary quantitative evidence for normalizability. The fit range in Fig. 3(d) appears limited (roughly n = 3 to 17); a wider range or a discussion of systematic finite-size corrections would strengthen the cubic-scaling claim.
  3. [Fig. 4 and footnote 3] The classification of candidate space groups needs a precise statement of the assumptions. The example #224 -> #195 involves more than 'stripping nonsymmorphic symmetries': inversion and some symmorphic operations are also lost because the defect is not at the inversion center. Please describe how the defect position/centering is chosen, how the subgroup was computed, and whether the criterion is necessary and sufficient for the mechanism. As written, the reader cannot reproduce the table from the stated rule.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'an examples of a bound state in the continuum' should be corrected to 'an example'. Also, the introduction's discussion of Anderson localization of light in 3D is heavily compressed; the citations [41,44] are appropriate, but one sentence stating the current consensus would help the reader.
  2. [Fig. 3(a)] The axis labels in Fig. 3(a) are cramped, especially the frequency range around omega0. Consider enlarging the inset or using a different layout to make the frequency match and Q maximum clearly visible.
  3. [Lippmann-Schwinger equation] The integral equation E(r) = ∫ G Δε E(r') is written without the homogeneous term. Since the discussion immediately addresses the degenerate bulk modes at omega0, the text should state why the homogeneous term is absent (the symmetry orthogonality) or should include it and then show it vanishes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: constructive design is verified by independent MPB/MEEP simulations; the unproved c_alpha=0 cancellation is a rigor gap, not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The paper starts from a known 3D photonic crystal (space group #224), identifies a symmetry-protected quadratic degeneracy at omega0 with vanishing DOS, introduces a spherical defect, and tunes the defect radius rd/a to bring a one-dimensional defect irrep into degeneracy with the bulk three-dimensional irrep at the R point (Fig. 2). This tuning is a designed condition, not a parameter fitted to the result the paper claims to predict: the paper does not claim a parameter-free prediction of omega0 or Q. The numerical checks are independent: MPB supercell bands show a crossing without avoided crossing, and MEEP/FDTD shows a Q maximum at the tuned radius, an algebraic field decay fitted as |E| ~ r^{-2.61}/r^{-2.78} (not imposed to be r^{-5/2}), and Q ~ n^{3.06} scaling that is distinct from the saturating detuned case. The weakest point is the Lippmann-Schwinger paragraph, where the paper asserts c_alpha=0 'because ... the representations of the bulk and defect modes are incompatible by symmetry' without deriving the group-theoretic reduction or accounting for Bloch phase factors at the R point. That is an omitted proof and a falsifiable correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the vanishing of the overlaps is an assumption/consequence to be checked, not an input definition of the conclusion, and the numerical absence of hybridization provides supporting evidence. The space-group census in Fig. 4 is explicitly labeled 'necessary but not sufficient conditions,' and prior self-citations (e.g., Refs. [31,35,36]) are contextual examples, not the load-bearing derivation. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted parameter is smuggled in via self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the symmetry argument and numerical simulations. No new physical entities are introduced; the defect is a modification of dielectric geometry, not a new mediator. The free parameters are design choices rather than fitting parameters for an external prediction.

free parameters (3)
  • Defect radius rd/a = ≈0.76–0.77 (tuned to align defect mode with ω0)
    Chosen by hand to bring a 1D defect mode into degeneracy with the bulk triply degenerate mode at ω0; central to the demonstration.
  • Bulk rod radius rc/a = 0.18
    Chosen by hand to isolate the quadratic degeneracy at the R point; a design parameter, not fitted to an external dataset.
  • Dielectric constant ε = 11
    Chosen by hand to produce a frequency-isolated degeneracy; a design parameter.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations in a periodic dielectric medium describe the system.
    Standard physics background; invoked implicitly via the Maxwell operator and PWE/FDTD simulations.
  • domain assumption The PhC of space group #224 has a frequency-isolated triply degenerate quadratic band touching at the R point with vanishing DOS.
    Verified numerically in Fig. 1; central input to the confinement mechanism.
  • domain assumption Introducing a spherical defect reduces the space group to #195 and preserves a 3D irrep at the supercell R point, while the defect mode is a 1D irrep.
    Group-theoretic and numerical statement from Fig. 2; not independently proved in the text.
  • domain assumption The overlap integrals c_alpha between the defect mode and the three bulk modes vanish by symmetry.
    Used to eliminate the r^-1 Green-function tail; asserted in the Lippmann-Schwinger paragraph rather than derived.
  • domain assumption The bulk Green function near the quadratic degeneracy has a leading r^-1 tail whose coefficient is proportional to c_alpha.
    Asymptotic claim stated without full derivation; supports the normalizability argument.
  • standard math A mode decaying faster than r^{-3/2} is normalizable in 3D.
    Used to conclude that an r^-2 tail is sufficient for a genuine bound state.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-dimensional confinement of light in photonic crystals without bandgaps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5OK52MYN

@misc{pith2026260723281,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-dimensional confinement of light in photonic crystals without bandgaps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5OK52MYN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23281}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that confinement of light in three dimensions is possible in photonic crystals without a complete photonic bandgap. Our approach exploits symmetry-protected quadratic degeneracies in the bulk band structure, where the photonic density of states vanishes at an isolated frequency. By introducing a point defect, we create a localized mode whose symmetry representation is incompatible with that of the surrounding bulk modes, suppressing coupling to propagating channels. The combination of vanishing density of states and a symmetry mismatch yields bound defect modes despite the absence of a spectral gap, as confirmed by time- and frequency-domain numerical simulations. This approach highlights the role of engineering the photonic environment around the defect to enable confinement, potentially providing a new route for designing optical cavities in three-dimensional photonic crystals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.23281 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Bulk band structure and density of states: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Embedding a defect mode at the bulk degeneracy: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Confinement and field profiles of the defect mode: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Candidate symmetry settings for the localization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, Photonic Crystals: Molding the Flow of Light, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    S. G. Johnson, S. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, J. D. Joannopoulos, and L. A. Kolodziejski, Three-dimensional photonic crystals with a complete band gap from a simple cubic lattice, Phys. Rev. B60, 5751 (1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    John, Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices, Physical review letters58, 2486 (1987)

    S. John, Strong localization of photons in certain disordered dielectric superlattices, Physical review letters58, 2486 (1987)

    1987

  4. [4]

    Yablonovitch, Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics, Physical review letters58, 2059 (1987)

    E. Yablonovitch, Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics, Physical review letters58, 2059 (1987)

  5. [5]

    Yablonovitch, Photonic band-gap structures, Journal of the optical society of America B10, 283 (1993)

    E. Yablonovitch, Photonic band-gap structures, Journal of the optical society of America B10, 283 (1993)

    1993

  6. [6]

    Subramania and S

    G. Subramania and S. Y . Lin, Fabrication of three-dimensional photonic crystal with alignment based on electron beam lithogra- phy, Applied Physics Letters85, 5037 (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    M. Qi, E. Lidorikis, P. T. Rakich, S. G. Johnson, J. Joannopoulos, E. P. Ippen, and H. I. Smith, A three-dimensional optical photonic crystal with designed point defects, Nature429, 538 (2004)

    2004

  8. [8]

    Deubel, G

    M. Deubel, G. V on Freymann, M. Wegener, S. Pereira, K. Busch, and C. M. Soukoulis, Direct laser writing of three-dimensional photonic-crystal templates for telecommunications, Nature ma- terials3, 444 (2004)

    2004

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Vaidya, J

    S. Vaidya, J. Noh, A. Cerjan, C. J ¨org, G. von Freymann, and M. C. Rechtsman, Observation of a charge-2 photonic weyl point in the infrared, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 253902 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    J¨org, S

    C. J¨org, S. Vaidya, J. Noh, A. Cerjan, S. Augustine, G. von Frey- mann, and M. C. Rechtsman, Observation of quadratic (charge-2) weyl point splitting in near-infrared photonic crystals, Laser & Photonics Reviews16, 2100452 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Schulz, S

    J. Schulz, S. Vaidya, and C. J¨org, Topological photonics in 3d micro-printed systems, APL Photonics6, 080901 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    V . F. Chernow, R. C. Ng, S. Peng, H. A. Atwater, and J. R. Greer, Dispersion mapping in 3-dimensional core–shell photonic crystal lattices capable of negative refraction in the mid-infrared, Nano Letters21, 9102 (2021), pMID: 34672602

    2021

  5. [13]

    S. Peng, R. Zhang, V . H. Chen, E. T. Khabiboulline, P. Braun, and H. A. Atwater, Three-dimensional single gyroid photonic 6 crystals with a mid-infrared bandgap, ACS Photonics3, 1131 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    L. Chen, K. A. Morgan, G. A. Alzaidy, C.-C. Huang, Y .-L. D. Ho, M. P. Taverne, X. Zheng, Z. Ren, Z. Feng, I. Zeimpekis, et al., Observation of complete photonic bandgap in low refrac- tive index contrast inverse rod-connected diamond structured chalcogenides, ACS Photonics6, ...

    2019

  7. [15]

    J. E. Wijnhoven and W. L. V os, Preparation of photonic crystals made of air spheres in titania, Science281, 802 (1998)

    1998

  8. [16]

    J. Lee, J. Kim, G. Posnjak, A. Ershova, D. Hayakawa, W. M. Shih, W. B. Rogers, Y . Ke, T. Liedl, and S. Lee, Dna origami colloidal crystals: opportunities and challenges, Nano letters25, 16 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Posnjak, X

    G. Posnjak, X. Yin, P. Butler, O. Bienek, M. Dass, S. Lee, I. D. Sharp, and T. Liedl, Diamond-lattice photonic crystals assembled from dna origami, Science384, 781 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    M. He, J. P. Gales, ´E. Ducrot, Z. Gong, G.-R. Yi, S. Sacanna, and D. J. Pine, Colloidal diamond, Nature585, 524 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Salamin, G

    Y . Salamin, G. Yang, B. Mills, A. Grossi Fonseca, C. Roques- Carmes, Q. Yang, J. Beroz, S. E. Kooi, M. de Miguel Comella, K. Mak,et al., Three-dimensional nanophotonics with spatially modulated optical properties, Light: Science & Applications15, 145 (2026)

    2026

  12. [20]

    D. Oran, S. G. Rodriques, R. Gao, S. Asano, M. A. Skylar-Scott, F. Chen, P. W. Tillberg, A. H. Marblestone, and E. S. Boyden, 3d nanofabrication by volumetric deposition and controlled shrink- age of patterned scaffolds, Science362, 1281 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    J. H. Moon, J. Ford, and S. Yang, Fabricating three-dimensional polymeric photonic structures by multi-beam interference lithog- raphy, Polymers for Advanced Technologies17, 83 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Divliansky, T

    I. Divliansky, T. S. Mayer, K. S. Holliday, and V . H. Crespi, Fabrication of three-dimensional polymer photonic crystal struc- tures using single diffraction element interference lithography, Applied Physics Letters82, 1667 (2003)

    2003

  15. [23]

    H. Men, K. Y . Lee, R. M. Freund, J. Peraire, and S. G. Johnson, Robust topology optimization of three-dimensional photonic- crystal band-gap structures, Optics express22, 22632 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Cerjan and S

    A. Cerjan and S. Fan, Complete photonic band gaps in supercell photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. A96, 051802 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    C. Y . Kao, S. Osher, and E. Yablonovitch, Maximizing band gaps in two-dimensional photonic crystals by using level set methods, Applied Physics B81, 235 (2005)

    2005

  18. [26]

    S. Kim, T. Christensen, S. G. Johnson, and M. Soljacic, Auto- mated discovery and optimization of 3d topological photonic crystals, ACS Photonics10, 861 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Jablan, H

    M. Jablan, H. Buljan, and M. Soljaˇci´c, Plasmonics in graphene at infrared frequencies, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics80, 245435 (2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    J. B. Khurgin, Ultimate limit of field confinement by surface plasmon polaritons, Faraday discussions178, 109 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Y . Yang, O. D. Miller, T. Christensen, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljacic, Low-loss plasmonic dielectric nanoresonators, Nano letters17, 3238 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Monticone, H

    F. Monticone, H. M. Doeleman, W. Den Hollander, A. F. Koen- derink, and A. Alu, Trapping light in plain sight: embedded photonic eigenstates in zero-index metamaterials, Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews12, 1700220 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Vaidya, W

    S. Vaidya, W. A. Benalcazar, A. Cerjan, and M. C. Rechtsman, Point-defect-localized bound states in the continuum in photonic crystals and structured fibers, Physical review letters127, 023605 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, J. Lee, S.-L. Chua, S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇci´c, Observation of a bound state in the continuum in a photonic crystal slab, Nature499, 188 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    X. Gao, B. Zhen, M. Soljacic, H. Chen, and C. W. Hsu, Bound states in the continuum in fiber bragg gratings, ACS photonics6, 2996 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    M. Kang, T. Liu, C. T. Chan, and M. Xiao, Applications of bound states in the continuum in photonics, Nature Reviews Physics5, 659 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Cerjan, C

    A. Cerjan, C. W. Hsu, and M. C. Rechtsman, Bound states in the continuum through environmental design, Physical review letters123, 023902 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Cerjan, C

    A. Cerjan, C. J¨org, S. Vaidya, S. Augustine, W. A. Benalcazar, C. W. Hsu, G. V on Freymann, and M. C. Rechtsman, Observa- tion of bound states in the continuum embedded in symmetry bandgaps, Science advances7, eabk1117 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Watts, S

    M. Watts, S. Johnson, H. Haus, and J. Joannopoulos, Electromag- netic cavity with arbitrary q and small modal volume without a complete photonic bandgap, Optics letters27, 1785 (2002)

    2002

  30. [38]

    Y . Xu, W. Liang, A. Yariv, J. G. Fleming, and S.-Y . Lin, Modal analysis of bragg onion resonators, Optics letters29, 424 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    P. W. Andersonet al., Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Physical review109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  32. [40]

    Segev, Y

    M. Segev, Y . Silberberg, and D. N. Christodoulides, Anderson localization of light, Nature Photonics7, 197 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    Yamilov, S

    A. Yamilov, S. E. Skipetrov, T. W. Hughes, M. Minkov, Z. Yu, and H. Cao, Anderson localization of electromagnetic waves in three dimensions, Nature physics19, 1308 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    J. Liu, P. Garcia, S. Ek, N. Gregersen, T. Suhr, M. Schubert, J. Mørk, S. Stobbe, and P. Lodahl, Random nanolasing in the an- derson localized regime, Nature Nanotechnology9, 285 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Sapienza, H

    L. Sapienza, H. Thyrrestrup, S. Stobbe, P. D. Garcia, S. Smolka, and P. Lodahl, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with anderson- localized modes, Science327, 1352 (2010)

    2010

  36. [44]

    Yamilov, H

    A. Yamilov, H. Cao, and S. E. Skipetrov, Anderson transition for light in a three-dimensional random medium, Physical review letters134, 046302 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Z. Yang, M. Xiao, F. Gao, L. Lu, Y . Chong, and B. Zhang, Weyl points in a magnetic tetrahedral photonic crystal, Optics express 25, 15772 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Kittel and P

    C. Kittel and P. McEuen,Introduction to solid state physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    K. Xie, H. Jiang, A. D. Boardman, Y . Liu, Z. Wu, M. Xie, P. Jiang, Q. Xu, M. Yu, and L. E. Davis, Trapped photons at a dirac point: a new horizon for photonic crystals, Laser & Photonics Reviews 8, 583 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    L. Hu, K. Xie, Z. Hu, Q. Mao, J. Xia, H. Jiang, J. Zhang, J. Wen, and J. Chen, Experimental observation of wave localization at the dirac frequency in a two-dimensional photonic crystal micro- cavity, Opt. Express26, 8213 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    L. Yang, G. Qian, G. Tang, F. Yuan, Z. Zhang, K. Huang, Z. Shi, Q. Qian, and Z. Yang, Observation of dirac mode in modified honeycomb hollow core photonic crystal fiber, Optical Materials 89, 203 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    K. Xie, W. Zhang, A. D. Boardman, H. Jiang, Z. Hu, Y . Liu, M. Xie, Q. Mao, L. Hu, Q. Li, T. Yang, F. Wen, and E. Wang, Fiber guiding at the dirac frequency beyond photonic bandgaps, Light: Science & Applications4, e304 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    J. A. Medina-V ´azquez, E. Y . Gonz ´alez-Ram´ırez, and J. G. Murillo-Ram´ırez, Corner states in photonic higher-order dirac semimetals, Physical Review A107, 053511 (2023). 7

    2023

  44. [52]

    Garc´ıa-Elcano, A

    I. Garc´ıa-Elcano, A. Gonz´alez-Tudela, and J. Bravo-Abad, Tun- able and robust long-range coherent interactions between quan- tum emitters mediated by weyl bound states, arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.07513 (2019)

    1903 arXiv

  45. [53]

    L. Ying, M. Zhou, M. Mattei, B. Liu, P. Campagnola, R. H. Gold- smith, and Z. Yu, Extended range of dipole-dipole interactions in periodically structured photonic media, Physical Review Letters 123, 173901 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Wehling, A

    T. Wehling, A. Balatsky, M. Katsnelson, A. Lichtenstein, K. Scharnberg, and R. Wiesendanger, Local electronic signatures of impurity states in graphene, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics75, 125425 (2007)

    2007

  47. [55]

    Teschl,Mathematical methods in quantum mechanics, V ol

    G. Teschl,Mathematical methods in quantum mechanics, V ol. 157 (American Mathematical Soc., 2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    S. G. Johnson and J. D. Joannopoulos, Block-iterative frequency- domain methods for maxwell’s equations in a planewave basis, Opt. Express8, 173 (2001)

    2001

  49. [57]

    A. F. Oskooi, D. Roundy, M. Ibanescu, P. Bermel, J. D. Joannopoulos, and S. G. Johnson, Meep: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the fdtd method, Computer Physics Communications181, 687 (2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    V . A. Mandelshtam and H. S. Taylor, Harmonic inversion of time signals and its applications, The Journal of chemical physics107, 6756 (1997)

    1997

  51. [59]

    Ghorashi, S

    A. Ghorashi, S. Vaidya, Z. Liu, C. Loh, T. Christensen, M. Tegmark, and M. Soljacic, Symbolic learning of topolog- ical bands in photonic crystals, ACS Photonics13, 2572 (2026)

    2026

  52. [60]

    Slobozhanyuk, S

    A. Slobozhanyuk, S. H. Mousavi, X. Ni, D. Smirnova, Y . S. Kivshar, and A. B. Khanikaev, Three-dimensional all-dielectric photonic topological insulator, Nature Photonics11, 130 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    L. Lu, L. Fu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇci´c, Weyl points and line nodes in gyroid photonic crystals, Nature photonics7, 294 (2013)

    2013

  54. [62]

    Cerjan and A

    B. Cerjan and A. Cerjan, Lines of bound states in the contin- uum in monodisperse microsphere structures, Laser & Photonics Reviews , e02179 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Thinel, S

    M. Thinel, S. Turkel, S. E. Rossi, C. S. Koay, D. G. Chica, X. Huang, M. Holbrook, A. Devarakonda, L. M. Nashabeh, A. B. Georgescu,et al., Electronic bound states in the continuum in a 2d metal, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19227 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    W. A. Benalcazar and A. Cerjan, Bound states in the continuum of higher-order topological insulators, Physical Review B101, 161116 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Ghorashi, N

    A. Ghorashi, N. Rivera, B. Shi, R. Sundararaman, E. Kaxiras, J. Joannopoulos, and M. Solja ˇci´c, Highly confined, low-loss plasmonics based on two-dimensional solid-state defect lattices, Physical Review Materials8, L011001 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.