Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Which hyponormal block Toeplitz operators are either normal or analytic?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.01373 v2 pith:5PQ6RRNZ submitted 2023-08-02 math.FA

classification math.FA
keywords toeplitzblockinneroperatorscurto-hwang-leefunctionshyponormalmatrix-valued
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In this paper, we continue Curto-Hwang-Lee's work to study the connection between hyponormality and subnormality for block Toeplitz operators acting on the vector-valued Hardy space of the unit circle. Curto-Hwang-Lee's work focuses primarily on hyponormality and subnormality of block Toeplitz operators with rational symbols. By studying the greatest common divisor of matrix-valued inner functions and the ``weak" commutativity of matrix-valued inner functions, we extended Curto-Hwang-Lee's result to block Toeplitz operators with symbols of bounded type. More precisely, we proved that if $\Psi,\Psi^{\ast}$ are matrix-valued functions of bounded type and the inner part of $\Psi$ of Douglas-Shapiro-Shields factorization is a scalar inner function, then every hyponormal Toeplitz operator $T_{\Psi}$ whose square is also hyponormal must be either normal or analytic.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools