On uniqueness and nonuniqueness for potential reconstruction in quantum fields from one measurement II. the non-radial case
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 11:27 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The ND map uniquely recovers the potential from one measurement in 2D and 3D core-shell structures but not for all potential-shape pairs.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Based on the theory of the ND map and modified Bessel function, the uniqueness theorem of the inverse problem in two-dimensional and three-dimensional core-shell structure is established, respectively. When different potential and shape are considered, the nonuniqueness results is also proved.
What carries the argument
The Neumann-to-Dirichlet map together with explicit modified Bessel function solutions in core-shell geometries that separate potential from shape.
If this is right
- Uniqueness holds for the potential in two-dimensional core-shell structures from one ND map.
- Uniqueness holds for the potential in three-dimensional core-shell structures from one ND map.
- Nonuniqueness holds when different potentials are paired with different shapes that compensate to give the same map.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The explicit solution method could apply to other layered or symmetric domains where similar radial solutions exist.
- Nonuniqueness examples suggest that reconstruction in general domains may require shape constraints or additional data to avoid ambiguity.
- The results indicate a trade-off between potential and domain geometry that could be exploited or avoided in inverse problem algorithms.
Load-bearing premise
The core-shell geometry admits explicit solutions via modified Bessel functions that allow the ND map to separate the potential from the domain shape.
What would settle it
Constructing or observing two different core-shell (potential, shape) pairs that produce exactly the same ND map would support the nonuniqueness claim, while showing that no such pairs exist would strengthen the uniqueness theorems.
read the original abstract
In this article we study uniqueness and nonuniqueness for potential reconstruction from one boundary measurement in quantum fields, associated with the steady state Schr\"{o}dinger equation. It is an extension of our recent work \cite{Zheng2019}. Based the theory of the ND map and modified bessel function, the uniqueness theorem of the inverse problem in two-dimensional nd three-dimensional core-shell structure is established, respectively. When different potential and shape are considered, the nonuniqueness results is also proved.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper extends the authors' prior work on inverse problems for the steady-state Schrödinger equation, claiming to prove uniqueness theorems for potential reconstruction from a single boundary measurement (via the ND map) in 2D and 3D non-radial core-shell structures, using explicit formulas involving modified Bessel functions. It also constructs nonuniqueness examples when the potential and domain shape are allowed to vary simultaneously.
Significance. If the claims are valid, the results would clarify identifiability conditions for potentials in composite (core-shell) geometries, distinguishing unique recovery from nonuniqueness in the non-radial setting. The explicit use of ND-map theory combined with special functions is presented as enabling both positive and negative results.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the uniqueness and nonuniqueness statements both rely on an explicit ND-map formula obtained via modified Bessel functions that purportedly separates the potential q from the domain shape. Modified Bessel functions arise from separation of variables after reduction to radial coordinates; this closed-form separation does not extend to genuinely non-radial inner/outer boundaries or non-radial q. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claims in both the 2D and 3D cases.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] Abstract contains typographical errors ('nd' for 'and', 'is also proved' should be 'are also proved').
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this key point about the scope of the explicit ND-map formula. We respond to the major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the uniqueness and nonuniqueness statements both rely on an explicit ND-map formula obtained via modified Bessel functions that purportedly separates the potential q from the domain shape. Modified Bessel functions arise from separation of variables after reduction to radial coordinates; this closed-form separation does not extend to genuinely non-radial inner/outer boundaries or non-radial q. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claims in both the 2D and 3D cases.
Authors: The referee correctly notes that the explicit ND-map formula is derived via separation of variables, yielding modified Bessel functions, and therefore requires radial symmetry of the potential together with boundaries (circular in 2D, spherical in 3D) that permit this reduction. In the manuscript the phrase “non-radial case” is used to indicate that we allow the potential and the domain shape to vary simultaneously when constructing non-uniqueness examples, while the uniqueness statements themselves are proved under the radial-reduction setting inherited from the ND-map formula. For genuinely non-radial boundaries or non-radial q the closed-form expression does not hold and the stated uniqueness would require different techniques. We will revise the abstract, the introduction, and the statements of the main theorems to make the geometric and coefficient assumptions explicit and to qualify the scope of the results accordingly. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Minor self-citation to prior ND-map theory; no reduction of new uniqueness/nonuniqueness claims to inputs by construction
specific steps
-
self citation load bearing
[Abstract]
"It is an extension of our recent work [Zheng2019]. Based the theory of the ND map and modified bessel function, the uniqueness theorem of the inverse problem in two-dimensional nd three-dimensional core-shell structure is established, respectively."
The load-bearing ND-map theory used to separate potential from domain shape (and thereby obtain both uniqueness and nonuniqueness) is justified solely by citation to the authors' own prior paper rather than re-derived or externally verified here.
full rationale
The paper explicitly positions itself as an extension of the authors' earlier work and invokes ND-map theory plus modified Bessel functions to derive uniqueness for 2D/3D core-shell structures and nonuniqueness constructions. This constitutes one minor self-citation that is not load-bearing for the central claims, as the manuscript presents separate arguments for the non-radial case. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling are exhibited in the provided text. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks for the ND map.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption The ND map together with modified Bessel solutions separates potential from domain shape in non-radial core-shell geometries.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel (J uniqueness) unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Based on the theory of the ND map and modified bessel function, the uniqueness theorem... (2.13) R_σ1,r1(g) expressed via ρ(r1,σ1) involving I_n,K_n and D(r1,r2) Wronskians; Thm 2.6 uses Cor 2.4 monotonicity of F(η)
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking (D=3 from linking) echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
3-D case uses ν=n+1/2 spherical modified Bessel (3.45)–(3.58); D=3 tacitly assumed for spherical harmonics
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
A. P. Calderon On an inverse boundary value problem, in Seminar on Numerica l Analysis and Its Applications to Continuum Physics , Soc. Brasil. Mat., Rio de Janeiro, 1980, 65-73
work page 1980
-
[2]
A. L. Bukhgeim and G. Uhlmann , Recovering a potential from partial Cauchy data , Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 27 (2002), 653-668
work page 2002
-
[3]
V.Isakov, On uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with loca l data , Inverse Probl. Imaging, 1 (2007), 95-105
work page 2007
-
[4]
O. Y. Imanuvilov, G. Uhlmann and M.Yamamoto , The Caldern problem with partial data in two dimensions , J. Am. Math. Soc., 23 (2010), 655-691
work page 2010
-
[5]
O. Y. Imanuvilov and G. Uhlmann , Inverse boundary value problem for the Schr¨ odinger equation in a cylindrical domain by partial bo undary data , Inverse Prob- lems, 29 (2013), 045002
work page 2013
-
[6]
C. Kenig and M. Salo , Recent progress in the Caldern problem with partial data , Contemp. Math., 615 (2014), 193-222
work page 2014
-
[7]
A. Greenleaf, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann , Anisotropic conductivities that cannot be detected by EIT , Physiological Measurement, 24 (2003), 413-419
work page 2003
-
[8]
A. Greenleaf, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann , On nonuniqueness for Calderns inverse problem , Mathematical Research Letters, 10 (2003), 685-694
work page 2003
-
[9]
A. Greenleaf, Y. kurylev, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann , Full-wave invisibility of active devices at all frequencies , Communications in Mathematical Physics, 275 (2007), 749-789
work page 2007
-
[10]
A. Greenleaf, Y. kurylev, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann , Cloaking devices, electromagnetic wormholes, and transformation optics , SIAM Review, 51 (2009), 3-33
work page 2009
-
[11]
H. Y. Liu , Virtual reshaping and invisibility in obstacle scattering , Inverse Problems, 25 (2009), 045006
work page 2009
-
[12]
Guang-Hui Zheng and Zhi-Qiang Miao , On uniqueness and nonuniqueness for potential reconstruction in quantum fields from one measure ment, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1903.11825
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903
-
[13]
Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude, B.Diu and F.Laloe , Quantum Mechanics, Volume 1, Quantum Mechanics for Chemists, 1991
work page 1991
-
[14]
A. Friedman and V.Isakov , On the uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with one measurement , Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 38 (1989), 563-579
work page 1989
-
[15]
G. Alberti and M. Santacesaria , Calder´ on ’s Inverse Problem with a Finite Num- ber of Measurements , arXiv preprint, arXiv:1803.04224v1, 2018. 14
-
[16]
M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun , Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables , U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, 55 (1964), 803-819
work page 1964
-
[17]
Segura , A new type of sharp bounds for ratios of modified Bessel functions , J
Diego Ruiz-Antoln and J. Segura , A new type of sharp bounds for ratios of modified Bessel functions , J. Math. Anal. Appl, 443 (2016), 1232-1246
work page 2016
-
[18]
Jaeger , Heat conduction in composite circular cylinders , Phil
J. Jaeger , Heat conduction in composite circular cylinders , Phil. Mag., 32(1941) 324- 335. 15
work page 1941
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.