pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.01948 · v1 · pith:5PSCGNNYnew · submitted 2019-07-02 · 🧮 math.AP

On uniqueness and nonuniqueness for potential reconstruction in quantum fields from one measurement II. the non-radial case

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 11:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords inverse problemsSchrödinger equationNeumann-Dirichlet mappotential reconstructioncore-shell structureuniquenessnonuniquenessmodified Bessel functions
0
0 comments X

The pith

The ND map uniquely recovers the potential from one measurement in 2D and 3D core-shell structures but not for all potential-shape pairs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proves uniqueness theorems for reconstructing the potential in the steady-state Schrödinger equation from a single Neumann-to-Dirichlet map in two- and three-dimensional core-shell structures. It uses the ND map together with explicit solutions expressed via modified Bessel functions to separate the potential from the shape. The work also demonstrates nonuniqueness by constructing different potentials paired with different shapes that generate the same map. Readers would care because these results clarify the conditions under which one boundary measurement suffices to recover the quantum potential.

Core claim

Based on the theory of the ND map and modified Bessel function, the uniqueness theorem of the inverse problem in two-dimensional and three-dimensional core-shell structure is established, respectively. When different potential and shape are considered, the nonuniqueness results is also proved.

What carries the argument

The Neumann-to-Dirichlet map together with explicit modified Bessel function solutions in core-shell geometries that separate potential from shape.

If this is right

  • Uniqueness holds for the potential in two-dimensional core-shell structures from one ND map.
  • Uniqueness holds for the potential in three-dimensional core-shell structures from one ND map.
  • Nonuniqueness holds when different potentials are paired with different shapes that compensate to give the same map.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit solution method could apply to other layered or symmetric domains where similar radial solutions exist.
  • Nonuniqueness examples suggest that reconstruction in general domains may require shape constraints or additional data to avoid ambiguity.
  • The results indicate a trade-off between potential and domain geometry that could be exploited or avoided in inverse problem algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

The core-shell geometry admits explicit solutions via modified Bessel functions that allow the ND map to separate the potential from the domain shape.

What would settle it

Constructing or observing two different core-shell (potential, shape) pairs that produce exactly the same ND map would support the nonuniqueness claim, while showing that no such pairs exist would strengthen the uniqueness theorems.

read the original abstract

In this article we study uniqueness and nonuniqueness for potential reconstruction from one boundary measurement in quantum fields, associated with the steady state Schr\"{o}dinger equation. It is an extension of our recent work \cite{Zheng2019}. Based the theory of the ND map and modified bessel function, the uniqueness theorem of the inverse problem in two-dimensional nd three-dimensional core-shell structure is established, respectively. When different potential and shape are considered, the nonuniqueness results is also proved.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper extends the authors' prior work on inverse problems for the steady-state Schrödinger equation, claiming to prove uniqueness theorems for potential reconstruction from a single boundary measurement (via the ND map) in 2D and 3D non-radial core-shell structures, using explicit formulas involving modified Bessel functions. It also constructs nonuniqueness examples when the potential and domain shape are allowed to vary simultaneously.

Significance. If the claims are valid, the results would clarify identifiability conditions for potentials in composite (core-shell) geometries, distinguishing unique recovery from nonuniqueness in the non-radial setting. The explicit use of ND-map theory combined with special functions is presented as enabling both positive and negative results.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the uniqueness and nonuniqueness statements both rely on an explicit ND-map formula obtained via modified Bessel functions that purportedly separates the potential q from the domain shape. Modified Bessel functions arise from separation of variables after reduction to radial coordinates; this closed-form separation does not extend to genuinely non-radial inner/outer boundaries or non-radial q. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claims in both the 2D and 3D cases.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains typographical errors ('nd' for 'and', 'is also proved' should be 'are also proved').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this key point about the scope of the explicit ND-map formula. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the uniqueness and nonuniqueness statements both rely on an explicit ND-map formula obtained via modified Bessel functions that purportedly separates the potential q from the domain shape. Modified Bessel functions arise from separation of variables after reduction to radial coordinates; this closed-form separation does not extend to genuinely non-radial inner/outer boundaries or non-radial q. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claims in both the 2D and 3D cases.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the explicit ND-map formula is derived via separation of variables, yielding modified Bessel functions, and therefore requires radial symmetry of the potential together with boundaries (circular in 2D, spherical in 3D) that permit this reduction. In the manuscript the phrase “non-radial case” is used to indicate that we allow the potential and the domain shape to vary simultaneously when constructing non-uniqueness examples, while the uniqueness statements themselves are proved under the radial-reduction setting inherited from the ND-map formula. For genuinely non-radial boundaries or non-radial q the closed-form expression does not hold and the stated uniqueness would require different techniques. We will revise the abstract, the introduction, and the statements of the main theorems to make the geometric and coefficient assumptions explicit and to qualify the scope of the results accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior ND-map theory; no reduction of new uniqueness/nonuniqueness claims to inputs by construction

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "It is an extension of our recent work [Zheng2019]. Based the theory of the ND map and modified bessel function, the uniqueness theorem of the inverse problem in two-dimensional nd three-dimensional core-shell structure is established, respectively."

    The load-bearing ND-map theory used to separate potential from domain shape (and thereby obtain both uniqueness and nonuniqueness) is justified solely by citation to the authors' own prior paper rather than re-derived or externally verified here.

full rationale

The paper explicitly positions itself as an extension of the authors' earlier work and invokes ND-map theory plus modified Bessel functions to derive uniqueness for 2D/3D core-shell structures and nonuniqueness constructions. This constitutes one minor self-citation that is not load-bearing for the central claims, as the manuscript presents separate arguments for the non-radial case. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling are exhibited in the provided text. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks for the ND map.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit list of free parameters or invented entities; the central claims rest on the domain assumption that the geometry permits separation via modified Bessel functions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The ND map together with modified Bessel solutions separates potential from domain shape in non-radial core-shell geometries.
    Invoked to establish both uniqueness and nonuniqueness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5610 in / 1075 out tokens · 19471 ms · 2026-05-25T11:27:47.473913+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A. P. Calderon On an inverse boundary value problem, in Seminar on Numerica l Analysis and Its Applications to Continuum Physics , Soc. Brasil. Mat., Rio de Janeiro, 1980, 65-73

  2. [2]

    A. L. Bukhgeim and G. Uhlmann , Recovering a potential from partial Cauchy data , Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 27 (2002), 653-668

  3. [3]

    Imaging, 1 (2007), 95-105

    V.Isakov, On uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with loca l data , Inverse Probl. Imaging, 1 (2007), 95-105

  4. [4]

    O. Y. Imanuvilov, G. Uhlmann and M.Yamamoto , The Caldern problem with partial data in two dimensions , J. Am. Math. Soc., 23 (2010), 655-691

  5. [5]

    O. Y. Imanuvilov and G. Uhlmann , Inverse boundary value problem for the Schr¨ odinger equation in a cylindrical domain by partial bo undary data , Inverse Prob- lems, 29 (2013), 045002

  6. [6]

    Kenig and M

    C. Kenig and M. Salo , Recent progress in the Caldern problem with partial data , Contemp. Math., 615 (2014), 193-222

  7. [7]

    Greenleaf, M

    A. Greenleaf, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann , Anisotropic conductivities that cannot be detected by EIT , Physiological Measurement, 24 (2003), 413-419

  8. [8]

    Greenleaf, M

    A. Greenleaf, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann , On nonuniqueness for Calderns inverse problem , Mathematical Research Letters, 10 (2003), 685-694

  9. [9]

    Greenleaf, Y

    A. Greenleaf, Y. kurylev, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann , Full-wave invisibility of active devices at all frequencies , Communications in Mathematical Physics, 275 (2007), 749-789

  10. [10]

    Greenleaf, Y

    A. Greenleaf, Y. kurylev, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann , Cloaking devices, electromagnetic wormholes, and transformation optics , SIAM Review, 51 (2009), 3-33

  11. [11]

    H. Y. Liu , Virtual reshaping and invisibility in obstacle scattering , Inverse Problems, 25 (2009), 045006

  12. [12]

    Guang-Hui Zheng and Zhi-Qiang Miao , On uniqueness and nonuniqueness for potential reconstruction in quantum fields from one measure ment, arXiv preprint, arXiv:1903.11825

  13. [13]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude, B.Diu and F.Laloe , Quantum Mechanics, Volume 1, Quantum Mechanics for Chemists, 1991

  14. [14]

    Friedman and V.Isakov , On the uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with one measurement , Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 38 (1989), 563-579

    A. Friedman and V.Isakov , On the uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with one measurement , Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 38 (1989), 563-579

  15. [15]

    Alberti and M

    G. Alberti and M. Santacesaria , Calder´ on ’s Inverse Problem with a Finite Num- ber of Measurements , arXiv preprint, arXiv:1803.04224v1, 2018. 14

  16. [16]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun , Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables , U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, 55 (1964), 803-819

  17. [17]

    Segura , A new type of sharp bounds for ratios of modified Bessel functions , J

    Diego Ruiz-Antoln and J. Segura , A new type of sharp bounds for ratios of modified Bessel functions , J. Math. Anal. Appl, 443 (2016), 1232-1246

  18. [18]

    Jaeger , Heat conduction in composite circular cylinders , Phil

    J. Jaeger , Heat conduction in composite circular cylinders , Phil. Mag., 32(1941) 324- 335. 15