Sample size and power calculations for causal inference of observational studies
read the original abstract
This paper investigates the theoretical foundation and develops analytical formulas for sample size and power calculations for causal inference with observational data. By analyzing the variance of an inverse probability weighting estimator of the average treatment effect, we decompose the power calculation into three components: propensity score distribution, potential outcome distribution, and their correlation. We show that to determine the minimal sample size of an observational study, in addition to the standard inputs in the power calculation of randomized trials, it is sufficient to have two parameters, which quantify the strength of the confounder-treatment and the confounder-outcome association, respectively. For the former, we propose using the Bhattacharyya coefficient, which measures the covariate overlap and, together with the treatment proportion, leads to a uniquely identifiable and easily computable propensity score distribution. For the latter, we propose a sensitivity parameter bounded by the R-squared statistic of the regression of the outcome on covariates. Our procedure relies on a parametric propensity score model and a semiparametric restricted mean outcome model, but does not require distributional assumptions on the multivariate covariates. We develop an associated R package PSpower and an online calculator.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Estimator-Aligned Prospective Sample Size Determination for Designs Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting
A GEE-based stacked M-estimation framework merges propensity score and marginal structural models to directly compute the large-sample variance of the IPTW estimator from pilot data for prospective sample size plannin...
-
Externally Controlled Trials: A Review of Design and Borrowing Through a Causal Lens
A review organizes externally controlled trial methodology through causal estimands and identifiability assumptions for single-arm and hybrid designs with borrowing strategies.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.