Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Software-Hardware Codesign for Efficient In-Memory Regular Pattern Matching

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.05686 v1 pith:5SO4BFGO submitted 2022-09-13 cs.FL

classification cs.FL
keywords counterregularcountingin-memorypatternvectordesignelements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Regular pattern matching is used in numerous application domains, including text processing, bioinformatics, and network security. Patterns are typically expressed with an extended syntax of regular expressions that include the computationally challenging construct of bounded iteration or counting, which describes the repetition of a pattern a fixed number of times. We develop a design for a specialized in-memory hardware architecture for NFA execution that integrates counter and bit vector elements. The design is inspired by the theoretical model of nondeterministic counter automata (NCA). A key feature of our approach is that we statically analyze regular expressions to determine bounds on the amount of memory needed for the occurrences of counting. The results of this analysis are used by a regex-to-hardware compiler in order to make an appropriate selection of counter or bit vector elements. We evaluate the performance of our hardware implementation on a simulator based on circuit parameters collected by SPICE simulation using a TSMC 28nm process. We find the usage of counter and bit vector quickly outperforms unfolding solutions by orders of magnitude with small counting quantifiers. Experiments concerning realistic workloads show up to 76% energy reduction and 58% area reduction in comparison to traditional in-memory NFA processors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools