Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Catalog: 10 Years of Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.13528 v1 pith:5TRHLYVR submitted 2021-03-24 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords grbsspectralyearsgamma-rayspectraanalysesburstcatalog
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the systematic spectral analyses of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM) during its first ten years of operation. This catalog contains two types of spectra; time-integrated spectral fits and spectral fits at the brightest time bin, from 2297 GRBs, resulting in a compendium of over 18000 spectra. The four different spectral models used for fitting the spectra were selected based on their empirical importance to the shape of many GRBs. We describe in detail our procedure and criteria for the analyses, and present the bulk results in the form of parameter distributions both in the observer frame and in the GRB rest frame. 941 GRBs from the first four years have been re-fitted using the same methodology as that of the 1356 GRBs in years five through ten. The data files containing the complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparing Quantum Machine Learning Approaches in Astrophysical Signal Detection

    astro-ph.IM 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In simulated GRB detection, quantum fingerprinting encoding consistently outperforms data reuploading, confirming that data encoding choice dominates QML performance.

Pith tools