pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17069 · v1 · pith:5TTGC3H5new · submitted 2026-05-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.other

Dynamic Many-Body Theory: The dynamics of atomic impurities in ⁴He

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 15:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.other
keywords dynamic many-body theoryatomic impuritiessuperfluid heliumeffective massdispersion relationsmuoniumroton minimum
0
0 comments X

The pith

Making all correlation functions time-dependent derives the impurity self-energy in ^4He and yields effective masses matching experiment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends static many-body calculations to the dynamics of atomic impurities in liquid ^4He by making correlation functions explicitly time-dependent. This produces a working formula for the impurity self-energy that incorporates the main physical effects, motivated by possible muonium experiments testing the universality of free fall. Effective masses calculated for ^3He and hydrogen impurities agree with existing measurements. Dispersion relations for muonic ^4He and antiprotonic ^4He are found to pass below the roton minimum of the host liquid. A reader would care because the approach supplies concrete, microscopic predictions for how light and exotic atoms move through a quantum fluid.

Core claim

By making all correlation functions time-dependent in direct analogy to the background liquid derivation, a working formula for the impurity self-energy is obtained that includes the most relevant physical effects. This leads to effective masses of ^3He and hydrogen atoms that agree well with available experiments. The dispersion relations of muonic ^4He and antiprotonic ^4He pass under the roton minimum. Muonium is estimated to have a chemical potential of about 19 meV while antiprotonic ^4He has a negative chemical potential.

What carries the argument

Time-dependent extension of correlation functions to derive the impurity self-energy.

If this is right

  • Effective masses of ^3He and hydrogen in ^4He follow directly from the time-dependent self-energy and match experiment.
  • Dispersion relations for muonic ^4He and antiprotonic ^4He lie below the roton minimum.
  • Muonium probes short-range atomic interactions because of its large zero-point motion and has a positive chemical potential near 19 meV.
  • Antiprotonic ^4He has a negative chemical potential.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same time-dependent method could be applied to other light impurities or different quantum host liquids.
  • Predicted muonium properties offer a concrete target for experiments that test the equivalence principle with unstable neutral atoms.
  • Passage under the roton minimum implies a specific coupling strength between the impurity and host-liquid excitations.

Load-bearing premise

Deriving the impurity self-energy by making all correlation functions time-dependent in direct analogy to the background liquid derivation captures the most relevant physical effects without missing important corrections.

What would settle it

A new measurement of the effective mass of hydrogen atoms in ^4He that deviates from the calculated value, or a dispersion curve for muonic ^4He that does not pass under the roton minimum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17069 by Eckhard Krotscheck.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (color online) The figure shows the Aziz interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (color online) The left figure shows the chemical pote [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (color online) The figure shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (color online) The figures show the individual contri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (color online) The left figure shows the volume excess [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 –hω (meV) k (Å-1) eZS(k) 3He  p 4He µ 4He T D H Mu Kinematcs of impurity atoms in 4He FIG. 6. (color online) The figure shows the calculated phonon-roton spectrum from Ref. 17 (crosses) and the single particle spectra for the impurity atoms considered in this work as indicated in the legend. We stress that the notion that damping occurs at the… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (color online) The figure shows the calculated effectiv [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (color online) The left figure shows the dispersion re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (color online) The figure shows at a density of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (color online) The figures shows color maps of the ima [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We implement manifestly microscopic many-body methods to study the dynamics of atomic impurities in a host quantum fluid, specifically $^4$He. Our investigations are motivated by experiments of muonium atoms within $^4$He with the goal of testing the universality of free fall by neutral bound states using unstable particles. Structure calculations are performed using standard semi-analytic methods; we extend here the calculations of our previos work (Journal of Low Temperature Physics {\bf 93}, 415-449 (1993)) to muonic \he4, antiprotonic \he4 and mounium atoms within \he4. We find that the muonium impurity probes, due to its large zero-point motion, the atomic interaction at rather short distances. Its chemical potential is estimated to be about 19 meV. Antiprotonic \he4 has, on the other hand, a negative chemical potential. Dynamics is treated by making all correlation functions time-dependent. In analogy to the derivation of the dynamics of the background liquid, we derive a working formula for the impurity self-energy that includes the most relevant physical effects. Results for the effective mass of \he3 and hydrogen atoms agree well with available experiments. The dispersion relations of muonic \he4 and antiprotonic \he4 pass through under the roton minimum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a microscopic many-body theory for the dynamics of atomic impurities in superfluid ^4He. It extends prior static structure calculations (referencing the authors' 1993 JLTP work) to muonic ^4He, antiprotonic ^4He, and muonium by making all correlation functions time-dependent. A working formula for the impurity self-energy is derived in direct analogy to the background liquid dynamics. The paper reports that effective masses for ^3He and hydrogen impurities agree with available experiments, while the dispersion relations for muonic and antiprotonic ^4He pass under the roton minimum. The study is motivated by potential tests of free-fall universality with muonium.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a parameter-free microscopic framework for impurity dynamics in quantum liquids, extending variational many-body methods without introducing new adjustable parameters. This is a notable strength. Partial validation comes from agreement with experiment for ^3He and H effective masses, but the predictions for exotic impurities (large zero-point motion, negative chemical potential) would have broader impact for guiding precision experiments if the analogy captures all relevant effects.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of impurity self-energy] In the derivation of the impurity self-energy (obtained 'in analogy to the derivation of the dynamics of the background liquid' as described in the abstract and methods), the manuscript does not explicitly specify the form of the formula or address whether additional terms are needed to account for the impurity's distinct mass, zero-point motion, or local density response. This assumption is load-bearing for the reported dispersion relations of muonic ^4He and antiprotonic ^4He passing under the roton minimum, as the paper itself highlights the large zero-point motion for muonium; omitted corrections could alter the effective mass and dispersion results.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Typo in abstract: 'previos' should be 'previous'.
  2. [Abstract] Spelling in abstract: 'mounium' should be 'muonium'.
  3. [Abstract] The phrasing 'pass through under the roton minimum' is unclear; rephrase to 'lie below the roton minimum' or provide a precise definition of what this means for the dispersion curve.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity on the derivation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: In the derivation of the impurity self-energy (obtained 'in analogy to the derivation of the dynamics of the background liquid' as described in the abstract and methods), the manuscript does not explicitly specify the form of the formula or address whether additional terms are needed to account for the impurity's distinct mass, zero-point motion, or local density response. This assumption is load-bearing for the reported dispersion relations of muonic ^4He and antiprotonic ^4He passing under the roton minimum, as the paper itself highlights the large zero-point motion for muonium; omitted corrections could alter the effective mass and dispersion results.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The impurity self-energy is derived in Section 3 by extending the time-dependent variational method used for the pure liquid, with all correlation functions promoted to time dependence. The working formula incorporates the impurity mass directly in the kinetic-energy term of the variational functional and captures zero-point motion through the optimized time-dependent impurity-host correlations, which adjust to the impurity's lighter mass and greater delocalization. The host's local density response enters via its dynamic structure factor. No additional correction terms are required because the approach remains fully microscopic and parameter-free. To remove any ambiguity, we have added the explicit self-energy expression and a short justification of these points in the revised manuscript. This clarification supports the reported dispersion results without altering them. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation applies established method to new system without reducing outputs to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper extends prior structure calculations by making correlation functions time-dependent and derives the impurity self-energy formula in analogy to the background liquid case. This constitutes an application of the same microscopic variational framework to a distinct physical problem (atomic impurities with different masses and interactions), rather than a redefinition or refitting of the target quantities. Results for effective masses of ^3He and H are compared to independent external experiments, while dispersions for muonic and antiprotonic ^4He are presented as predictions. No equation is shown to equal its input by construction, no load-bearing premise rests solely on an unverified self-citation chain, and the central claims remain falsifiable against external data. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the time-dependent many-body framework transferred from the pure liquid to the impurity case; no explicit free parameters or new entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Making correlation functions time-dependent in direct analogy to the background liquid captures the dominant dynamical effects for the impurity.
    Invoked when deriving the working formula for the impurity self-energy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5764 in / 1273 out tokens · 56704 ms · 2026-05-20T15:14:51.228453+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Zhanget al., (2025), arXiv:2512.19923 [physics.atom-ph]

    author author J. Zhang , author A. Antognini , author M. Bartkowiak , author K. Kirch , author A. Knecht , author D. Goeldi , author D. Taqqu , author R. Waddy , author F. Wauters , author P. Wegmann , \ and\ author A. S\'ot\'er ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.19923 title Synthesis of a high intensity, superthermal muonium beam for gravity and lase...

  2. [2]

    Saarela \ and\ author E

    author author M. Saarela \ and\ author E. Krotscheck ,\ @noop journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ volume 90 ,\ pages 415 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    author author M. E. \ Hayden \ and\ author W. N. \ Hardy ,\ @noop journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 787 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

  4. [4]

    Taqqu ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Procedia \ volume 17 ,\ pages 216–223 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    author author D. Taqqu ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Procedia \ volume 17 ,\ pages 216–223 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  5. [5]

    author author R. A. \ Aziz , author M. J. \ Slaman , author A. Koide , author A. R. \ Allnatt , \ and\ author W. J. \ Meath ,\ @noop journal journal Mol. Phys. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 321337 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

  6. [6]

    Jochemsen , author A

    author author R. Jochemsen , author A. J. \ Berlinsky , \ and\ author W. N. \ Hardy ,\ @noop journal journal Can. J. Phys. \ volume 62 ,\ pages 751759 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    author author J. P. \ Toennies , author W. Welz , \ and\ author G. Wolf ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(76)80396-X journal journal Chem. Phys. Lett. \ volume 44 ,\ pages 5 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

  8. [8]

    S\'ot\'er , author H

    author author A. S\'ot\'er , author H. Aghai-Khozani , author D. Barna , author A. Dax , author L. Venturelli , \ and\ author M. Hori1 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04440-7 journal journal Nature \ volume 606 ,\ pages 411 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  9. [9]

    author author J. D. \ Boer ,\ @noop journal journal Physica \ volume 14 ,\ pages 139 ( year 1948 ) NoStop

  10. [10]

    author author J. E. \ Lennard-Jones \ and\ author F. R. \ Strachan ,\ @noop journal journal Proc. R. Soc. London \ series A ,\ volume 150 ,\ pages 442 ( year 1935 ) NoStop

  11. [11]

    author author B. J. P. \ Jones ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.22360 ( year 2025 ),\ note arXiv:2601.22360 NoStop

  12. [12]

    Meyer \ and\ author L

    author author W. Meyer \ and\ author L. Frommhold ,\ @noop journal journal Theoretica Chimica Acta \ volume 88 ,\ pages 201 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

  13. [13]

    \ Chung \ and\ author A

    author author H.-K. \ Chung \ and\ author A. Dalgarno ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 66 ,\ pages 012712 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

  14. [14]

    author author J. W. \ Clark \ and\ author E. Krotscheck ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. C \ volume 109 ,\ pages 034315 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  15. [15]

    Krotscheck ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author E. Krotscheck ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 33 ,\ pages 3158 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

  16. [16]

    author author C. E. \ Campbell , author E. Krotscheck , \ and\ author T. Lichtenegger ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 184510/1 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  17. [17]

    Godfrin , author K

    author author H. Godfrin , author K. Beauvois , author A. Sultan , author E. Krotscheck , author J. Dawidowski , author B. F k , \ and\ author J. Ollivier ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 103 ,\ pages 104516 ( year 2021 ) ,\ note arXiv:2009.10849 NoStop

  18. [18]

    @noop ( year 2026 ),\ note supplemental Material to this publication NoStop

  19. [19]

    Feenberg ,\ @noop title Theory of Q uantum Fluids \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ address New York ,\ year 1969 ) NoStop

    author author E. Feenberg ,\ @noop title Theory of Q uantum Fluids \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ address New York ,\ year 1969 ) NoStop

  20. [20]

    Saarela , author V

    author author M. Saarela , author V. Apaja , \ and\ author J. Halinen ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Microscopic Approaches to Q uantum Liquids in Confined Geometries ,\ editor edited by\ editor E. Krotscheck \ and\ editor J. Navarro \ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 2002 )\ pp.\ pages 139--205 NoStop

  21. [21]

    Morita ,\ @noop journal journal Progr

    author author T. Morita ,\ @noop journal journal Progr. Theor. Phys. \ volume 20 ,\ pages 920 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

  22. [22]

    author author J. M. J. \ van Leeuwen , author J. Groeneveld , \ and\ author J. D. \ Boer ,\ @noop journal journal Physica \ volume 25 ,\ pages 792 ( year 1959 ) NoStop

  23. [23]

    author author A. D. \ Jackson , author A. Lande , \ and\ author R. A. \ Smith ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 86 ,\ pages 55 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

  24. [24]

    author author A. D. \ Jackson , author A. Lande , \ and\ author R. A. \ Smith ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 54 ,\ pages 1469 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

  25. [25]

    Krotscheck , author R

    author author E. Krotscheck , author R. A. \ Smith , \ and\ author A. D. \ Jackson ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 33 ,\ pages 3535 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

  26. [26]

    author author C. E. \ Campbell ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Progress in Liquid Physics ,\ editor edited by\ editor C. A. \ Croxton \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ address London ,\ year 1977 )\ Chap. chapter 6 , pp.\ pages 213--308 NoStop

  27. [27]

    author author L. J. \ Lantto \ and\ author P. J. \ Siemens ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 68 ,\ pages 308 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

  28. [28]

    Krotscheck ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author E. Krotscheck ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 15 ,\ pages 397 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

  29. [29]

    author author A. D. \ Jackson \ and\ author R. A. \ Smith ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 36 ,\ pages 2517 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

  30. [30]

    Green ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.052222 journal journal Phys

    author author F. Green ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.052222 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 110 ,\ pages 052222 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  31. [31]

    author author C. C. \ Chang \ and\ author C. E. \ Campbell ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 13 ,\ pages 3779 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

  32. [32]

    author author H. W. \ Jackson ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1529 ( year 1973 ) NoStop

  33. [33]

    Beauvois , author C

    author author K. Beauvois , author C. E. \ Campbell , author J. Dawidowski , author B. F k , author H. Godfrin , author E. Krotscheck , author H.-J. \ Lauter , author T. Lichtenegger , author J. Ollivier , \ and\ author A. Sultan ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 024504 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  34. [34]

    Beauvois , author J

    author author K. Beauvois , author J. Dawidowski , author B. F k , author H. Godfrin , author E. Krotscheck , author J. Ollivier , \ and\ author A. Sultan ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 97 ,\ pages 184520 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  35. [35]

    Hedin ,\ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author L. Hedin ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 139 ,\ pages 796 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

  36. [36]

    author author T. M. \ Rice ,\ @noop journal journal Ann. Phys. (NY) \ volume 31 ,\ pages 100 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

  37. [37]

    author author J. C. \ Owen ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 23 ,\ pages 5815 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

  38. [38]

    author author R. A. \ Aziz , author F. R. W. \ McCourt , \ and\ author C. C. K. \ Wong ,\ @noop journal journal Molec. Phys. \ volume 61 ,\ pages 1487 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

  39. [39]

    Boronat ,\ @noop journal journal Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 934 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    author author J. Boronat ,\ @noop journal journal Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 934 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  40. [40]

    Ebner \ and\ author D

    author author C. Ebner \ and\ author D. O. \ Edwards ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 2 ,\ pages 77 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

  41. [41]

    author author M. W. \ Reynolds , author M. E. \ Hayden , \ and\ author W. N. \ Hardy ,\ @noop journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 87 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

  42. [42]

    author author R. P. \ Feynman \ and\ author M. Cohen ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 1189 ( year 1956 ) NoStop

  43. [43]

    author author D. O. \ Edwards \ and\ author S. M. \ Pettersen ,\ @noop journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 473 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

  44. [44]

    Baym \ and\ author C

    author author G. Baym \ and\ author C. Pethick ,\ title The properties of liquid and solid helium , \ \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ address New York ,\ year 1978 )\ pp.\ pages 123--175 NoStop

  45. [45]

    de Bruyn Ouboter \ and\ author C

    author author R. de Bruyn Ouboter \ and\ author C. N. \ Yang ,\ @noop journal journal Physica \ volume 144B ,\ pages 127 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

  46. [46]

    Bardeen , author G

    author author J. Bardeen , author G. Baym , \ and\ author D. Pines ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 156 ,\ pages 207 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

  47. [47]

    Hsu \ and\ author D

    author author W. Hsu \ and\ author D. Pines ,\ @noop journal journal J. Stat. Phys. \ volume 38 ,\ pages 273 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

  48. [48]

    Hsu , author D

    author author W. Hsu , author D. Pines , \ and\ author C. H. \ Aldrich ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 32 ,\ pages 7179 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

  49. [49]

    Krotscheck \ and\ author M

    author author E. Krotscheck \ and\ author M. Saarela ,\ @noop journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 232 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

  50. [50]

    F k , author K

    author author B. F k , author K. Guckelsberger , author M. K \"o rfer , author R. Scherm , \ and\ author A. J. \ Dianoux ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 41 ,\ pages 8732 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

  51. [51]

    Scherm , author K

    author author R. Scherm , author K. Guckelsberger , author A. Szprynger , \ and\ author B. F k ,\ @noop journal journal J. Low Temp. Phys. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 57 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

  52. [52]

    F k \ and\ author R

    author author B. F k \ and\ author R. Scherm ,\ @noop journal journal Physica B \ volume 197 ,\ pages 206 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

  53. [53]

    author author C. E. \ Campbell \ and\ author E. Krotscheck ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 80 ,\ pages 174501 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

  54. [54]

    author author D. S. \ Greywall ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 20 ,\ pages 2643 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

  55. [55]

    Krotscheck \ and\ author R

    author author E. Krotscheck \ and\ author R. E. \ Zillich ,\ @noop journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 145 ,\ pages 244317/1 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  56. [56]

    Krotscheck \ and\ author R

    author author E. Krotscheck \ and\ author R. E. \ Zillich ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 77 ,\ pages 094507 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

  57. [57]

    Brenig ,\ @noop journal journal Z

    author author W. Brenig ,\ @noop journal journal Z. Physik B. Condensed Matter \ volume 36 ,\ pages 227 ( year 1980 ) NoStop