Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon and the Ultraviolet Extinction Bump at the Cosmic Dawn

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A weighted mixture of PAH molecules reproduces the 2263 Å extinction bump JWST saw in a galaxy 800 Myr after the Big Bang.

desk verdict A well-executed but parameter-rich PAH-mixture fit to the JWST UV bump; the astrophysical inference stands only if the unbenchmarked TD-DFT peak positions hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08113 v1 pith:5UIOBAJT submitted 2025-02-12 astro-ph.GA

Qi Lin , Xuejuan Yang , Aigen Li , Joris Witstok This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords ultravioletextinctionbumppolycyclicaromatichydrocarbonsearlyuniversedustJWSTtime-dependentdensityfunctionaltheoryJADES-GS-z6-0interstellarcosmicdawn
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the unusually red, narrow ultraviolet extinction bump seen by JWST in JADES-GS-z6-0 at redshift $z\approx6.71$ is produced by a blend of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules. The authors compute UV absorption spectra for 48 compact PAHs and fit the observed spectrum with a weighted mixture, reproducing the bump's peak near 2263 Å and its narrow width. If correct, PAH molecules were already widespread in the interstellar medium just 800 million years after the Big Bang, at a time when asymptotic giant branch stars had not yet evolved to make dust. This matters because the classic 2175 Å bump has resisted identification for sixty years and the early Universe provides a new constraint on its carrier.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the $\pi^*\leftarrow\pi$ electronic transitions of compact pericondensed PAH molecules, computed with real-time time-dependent density functional theory. Each computed spectrum is fitted with a Drude function plus a Fano profile to get a peak wavelength and width, then an extinction mixture is built from per-carbon absorption cross sections $\langle C_{\rm abs}/N_C\rangle$ and a single scale $N_H[C/H]_{\rm PAH}$ determined by minimizing a weighted $\chi^2$ against the observed flux.

What would settle it

Measure the gas-phase UV/visible absorption spectra of the dominant molecules C19H11, C37H15, C52H18, C57H19, C59H19, C64H20, and C80H22; if their peak wavelengths or widths differ from the computed values by more than the bump's width, the reported reproduction would be coincidental.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the fitted combination of computed PAH spectra accounts for the JWST/NIRSpec extinction bump in JADES-GS-z6-0. The best fit is dominated by seven compact pericondensed molecules with 19 to 80 carbon atoms, weighted by abundances from a chi-square minimization; removing all seven but not any one of them spoils the fit. The inferred carbon abundance locked in PAHs is about 5.5 parts per million, roughly ten times lower than in the Milky Way. The authors conclude that the UV bump alone cannot uniquely identify individual molecules but that PAH molecules are a viable, if not required, carrier for the early-Universe bump.

Load-bearing premise

The match depends on the quantum-chemical spectra being accurate for large PAHs, which have almost no laboratory measurements to check; the authors themselves flag that the accuracy for large molecules is unclear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • PAH molecules were already present in significant amounts at $z\approx6.71$, before asymptotic giant branch stars could have produced them, so early dust must come from faster channels such as supernovae plus interstellar processing.
  • The required PAH carbon abundance is only about 5.5 parts per million, consistent with the low metallicity of JADES-GS-z6-0.
  • The bump's unusually long peak wavelength follows from a size distribution centered near 53 carbon atoms, because larger PAHs shift their $\pi^*\leftarrow\pi$ transitions redward.
  • Individual molecules cannot be identified from the broad UV bump alone; combining UV extinction with infrared PAH emission bands could lift that degeneracy.
  • The fit rules out graphitic grains as the carrier for this particular bump, since they predict a broader and redder feature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Validating the computed spectra with gas-phase measurements for PAHs near 50–80 carbon atoms would test whether the early-Universe bump genuinely picks out this size class.
  • A testable extension is to search for the 3.3 µm PAH emission feature in JADES-GS-z6-0 with MIRI; its detection would strengthen the PAH interpretation.
  • If early PAH populations are less diverse than the Milky Way's, higher signal-to-noise UV spectra might expose sharp individual molecular bands within the blend.
  • The same weighted-mixture approach could be applied to other JWST high-redshift galaxies to trace how PAH abundance and size evolve with redshift and metallicity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a weighted mixture of quantum-chemically computed electronic absorption spectra of 17 preselected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules can reproduce the unusually narrow and red-shifted 2263 Å ultraviolet extinction bump observed by JWST in the z≈6.71 galaxy JADES-GS-z6-0. The authors optimize 18 parameters (η_PAH plus 17 fractional weights) against 33 rest-frame flux data points, derive the best-fit mixture, and estimate a PAH carbon abundance of about 5.5 ppm. They argue against graphite grains as the carrier and suggest that supernova-produced PAHs were already pervasive at cosmic dawn.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper offers a plausible identification of the carrier of the first extinction bump detected at cosmic dawn, with important implications for dust and molecule formation in the early universe. The manuscript is honest about the non-uniqueness of the molecular mixture and about the limitations of the quantum-chemical method, and it ships a reproducible computational pipeline for the TD-DFT spectra. However, the lack of experimental benchmarks for the dominant species, the circularity in the preselection and weighting, and the incomplete statistical reporting currently leave the claim suggestive rather than demonstrated. The paper's strength is its explicit admission of these limitations, which allows readers to see exactly where the evidence is thin.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (5)] The preselection of 17 out of 48 species using γ<1.0 μm⁻¹ and λ⁻¹<4.6 μm⁻¹ (Fig. 2) is explicitly motivated by the observed bump being narrow and red-shifted, and the weighting function ω′ in Eq. (5) further upweights the central bump region by a factor of 4 relative to the wings. This construction essentially guarantees that a weighted sum can approximate the bump profile, so the reported agreement in Fig. 3 is not an independent confirmation of the PAH model. The authors should demonstrate that the same fitting procedure fails when applied to a control set of PAHs that do not satisfy the preselection criteria (or to all 48 species without preselection), and report the resulting χ² for these control fits.
  2. [§2, footnote 2 (and Fig. 2)] The quantum-chemical spectra are validated only against gas-phase anthracene; none of the seven dominant contributors in the best fit (C64H20, C57H19, C52H18, C59H19, C37H15, C80H22, C19H11) has an experimental benchmark. As the paper itself concedes in footnote 2, the accuracy of real-time TD-DFT for large molecules is unknown. Because the preselection and fitting are sensitive to the computed peak positions (λ⁻¹<4.6 μm⁻¹) and widths (γ<1.0 μm⁻¹), a systematic shift of ~0.1 μm⁻¹ in the computed spectra could change the list of selected molecules and dramatically alter the fitted mixture. The authors should provide a quantitative sensitivity analysis, for example by re-running the full fitting procedure after applying uniform shifts of ±0.1 μm⁻¹ to all computed peak wavelengths, or by benchmarking two or three of the large species against a higher-level correlated method to bound the systematic error.
  3. [§3–§4, Eqs. (3)–(9)] The fitting procedure is underspecified statistically. The paper states that χ² is minimized over η_PAH and the 17 weights, but only the condition ∂χ²/∂η=0 is given (Eqs. 6–8); there is no description of the algorithm used to optimize the weights, the constraints imposed (e.g., positivity and normalization Σω_j=1), or the resulting reduced χ². With 18 free parameters and 33 data points, the reduced χ² is a crucial diagnostic of whether the fit is overfitting noise rather than reproducing a physical feature. The error bars in Fig. 3b are also not defined. Please report the reduced χ² for the fits in Figs. 3–5, the fitting algorithm, the constraints, and the method used to derive the parameter uncertainties.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The symbol [C/H]_gra is inconsistent with [C/H]_PAH used elsewhere in the paper; please unify the notation.
  2. [Footnote 3] The citation "Draine 1994" does not appear in the reference list, which contains "Draine 1993" and "Draine 2003"; please correct the citation or add the 1994 reference.
  3. [References] The reference "Laporte, N., Ellis, R. S., Boone, F. 2017 ApJL, 837, L21" is listed but is not cited in the text; either cite it or remove it.
  4. [Throughout] There are multiple extra spaces in "P AH" and "Y ang" throughout the text; please fix these typos.
  5. [§4] The phrase "we need to minimize χ² (see eqs. 3, 7)" is confusing because Eq. (7) is the solution for η, not the definition of χ²; please clarify the cross-reference.
  6. [§3 and throughout] The term "2175 Å bump" is used for a feature that peaks at 2263 Å; please state explicitly that "2175 Å" is a conventional historical label and the actual observed peak is at 2263 Å.
  7. [§5, Figs. 3b and 4] The robustness tests in §5 show that the derived seven-species mixture is not unique; the abstract and summary should be tempered to state that the bump is consistent with a mixture of PAHs of similar size and structure, rather than implying a unique identification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PAH bump match is an openly fitted model using independently computed spectra, not a disguised prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is transparent and non-circular. The PAH absorption cross sections are quantum-chemically computed (TD-DFT/OCTOPUS) independently of the JWST observation; the observed JADES-GS-z6-0 spectrum is an external dataset (Witstok et al. 2023). The mixture weights omega_j and normalization eta_PAH are explicitly fitted by minimizing chi^2 in Eqs. (3)-(8), and the result is presented as a fit ('we fitted the JWST/NIRSpec spectrum...'), not as a parameter-free prediction. The preselection of 17 species with gamma<1.0 um^-1 and lambda^-1<4.6 um^-1 (Sec. 3) uses the observed bump's narrowness and red peak to reduce the parameter space; this is a model-selection step that weakens the evidential value of the peak/width agreement, but it is openly disclosed and does not make any equation reduce to itself. The acknowledged limitation (footnote 2) that RT-TD-DFT accuracy for large PAHs is unverified is an external-validity/correctness risk, not circularity. Self-citations (Lin et al. 2023, Li et al. 2024) are methodological or comparative and are not load-bearing. No definitional, fitted-as-prediction, or uniqueness-imported circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fundamentally new entities are postulated. The paper's conclusion depends on the fidelity of TD-DFT spectra for large PAHs (only anthracene is benchmarked), on the extinction interpretation of the observed dip, on an assumed power-law continuum, on the representativeness of the molecule sample, and on a Milky Way-like gas-to-dust scaling to convert the fitted normalization into a carbon abundance. The 17 abundance weights, the overall normalization, the preselection cutoffs, and the bump-weighting function are all free or hand-chosen ingredients.

free parameters (4)
  • η_PAH = N_H × [C/H]_PAH = 2.34 × 10^16 cm^-2
    Normalization fitted via ∂χ²/∂η = 0 (eq. 7); sets the dust column needed to reproduce the bump amplitude.
  • Fractional weights ω_j for 17 PAH species = C64H20 24.9%, C57H19 22.4%, C52H18 15.0%, C59H19 13.3%, C37H15 10.8%, C80H22 9.5%, C19H11 4.1%; other ten <1%
    Relative abundances are free parameters in the χ² fit (eq. 3); they are adjusted to match the observed bump.
  • Preselection cutoffs (γ < 1.0 μm^-1 and λ^-1 < 4.6 μm^-1) = Not optimized; chosen by hand
    Applied before fitting to select 17 of 48 molecules whose computed bumps are narrow and red; this is post-hoc selection driven by the observed bump.
  • Bump-weight function ω'(λ) = 0 outside 2Δλ; 1 within 1-2Δλ; 2 within Δλ/2-Δλ; 4 within Δλ/2
    Arbitrary weights in eq. (5) designed to 'force' the fit to prioritize the bump, affecting the best-fit parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Real-time TD-DFT (OCTOPUS) with B3LYP/6-31+G(d) optimization predicts accurate UV/visible absorption spectra for PAHs up to C150H30
    Only anthracene is validated against experiment; footnote 2 in §2 states 'It is not clear how accurate this method is for large molecules. We urgently need gas-phase experimental UV/visible spectra of PAH molecules of different species and sizes.'
  • domain assumption The 2263 Å dip in JADES-GS-z6-0 is interstellar extinction, not an intrinsic spectral feature
    Adopted from Witstok et al. (2023); if the dip has a non-extinction origin, the PAH attenuation model in eqs. (1)-(2) is not applicable.
  • domain assumption The extinction-free continuum of JADES-GS-z6-0 is a power law (eq. 10) with index -2.13
    Taken from Witstok et al. (2023); continuum errors change the extracted bump profile and therefore the fitted PAH weights.
  • domain assumption Gas-to-extinction ratio scales as Z_sun/Z and dust properties match the Milky Way diffuse ISM when estimating N_H
    Used in §4 to derive N_H ≈ 4.3e21 cm^-2 and [C/H]_PAH ≈ 5.5 ppm from the fitted η_PAH; this scaling is unverified at z≈6.71.
  • domain assumption The 48 compact, pericondensed PAHs with NC=10-150 are representative of the interstellar PAH population
    Larger and non-compact PAHs are excluded; the paper justifies exclusion of NC>150 because computed peaks shift red, but this assumes the computed trend is correct.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon and the Ultraviolet Extinction Bump at the Cosmic Dawn." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5UIOBAJT

@misc{pith2026250208113,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon and the Ultraviolet Extinction Bump at the Cosmic Dawn},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5UIOBAJT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08113}
}
read the original abstract

First detected in 1965, the mysterious ultraviolet (UV) extinction bump at 2175 Angstrom is the most prominent spectroscopic feature superimposed on the interstellar extinction curve. Its carrier remains unidentified over the past six decades ever since its first detection, although many candidate materials have been proposed. Widely seen in the interstellar medium (ISM) of the Milky Way as well as several nearby galaxies, this bump was recently also detected by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) at the cosmic dawn in JADES-GS-z6-0, a distant galaxy at redshift z~6.71, corresponding to a cosmic age of just 800 million years after the Big Bang. Differing from that of the known Galactic and extragalactic interstellar sightlines which always peak at ~2175 Angstrom, the bump seen at z~6.71 in JADES-GS-z6-0 peaks at an appreciably longer wavelength of ~2263 Angstrom and is the narrowest among all known Galactic and extragalactic extinction bumps. Here we show that the combined electronic absorption spectra quantum-chemically computed for a number of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) molecules closely reproduce the bump detected by JWST in JADES-GS-z6-0. This suggests that PAH molecules have already been pervasive in the Universe at an epoch when asymptotic giant branch stars have not yet evolved to make dust.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08113 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Target PAH molecules for TD-DFT computations of their electronic transitions. 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.0 5.2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 l-1 p * p (m m-1 ) MW: l0 = 2175 Å JADES-GS-z6-0: l0 = 2263 Å JADES-GS-z6-0: g = 250 Å (3) C16H10 (4) C19H11 (5) C20H12 (6) C22H12 (7) C22H12 (8) C22H12 (9) C24H12 (10) C26H14 (11) C28H14 (12) C30H14 (13) C30H14 (14) C30H16 (15) C32H14 (16) C36H36 (17) C36H16 (18) C37H15 (19) C38H16 (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Peak wavelengths and widths of π ∗ ←π transitions of individual PAH species. Also shown are those of the Galactic average (horizontal, dashed black lines) and JADES-GS-z6-0 observed by JWST/NIRSpec (horizontal, dashed red lines). Article number, page 3 of 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left panel (a): Fitting the rest-frame UV spectrum of JADES-GS-z6 measured by JWST/NIRSpec (solid gray-shaded line) with a power￾law continuum (solid blue line) attenuated mainly by the absorption of PAH molecules (solid red line). The bottom orange-shaded line illustrates the fitting residual. Right panel (b): The fractional weights of the molecules that best fit the JWST/NIRSpec spectrum of JADES-GS-z6. 5. Discuss… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Upper panel (a, e): Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mapping Dust Attenuation at Kiloparsec Scales. III. The 2175\AA\ Bump

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The 2175Å attenuation bump is strongest at low Σ_Hα/Σ_* (especially non-SF regions) while absolute strength tracks dust column, supporting local radiation-field processing of its carriers.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    1985, ApJ, 290, L25

    Allamandola, L.J., Tielens, A.G.G.M., & Barker, J.R. 1985, ApJ, 290, L25

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    C., Savage, B

    Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132

    1978

  3. [3]

    M., Lee, K.L.K., Changala, P .B., et al

    Burkhardt, A. M., Lee, K.L.K., Changala, P .B., et al. 2021, ApJL, 913, L18

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    2021, A&A, 649, L15

    Cernicharo, J., Agúndez, M., Cabezas, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, L15

    2021

  5. [5]

    2003, ApJ, 59 2, 947

    Clayton, G.C., Gordon, K.D., Salama, F., et al. 2003, ApJ, 59 2, 947

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    1993, in ASP Conf

    Draine, B.T. 1993, in ASP Conf. Ser. 58, The First Symposium on the Infrared Cirrus and Di ffuse Interstellar Clouds, ed. R. Cutri & W . Latter (San Francisco: ASP), 227

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    2003, ARA&A, 41, 214

    Draine, B.T. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 214

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    J., Trucks, G

    Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W ., Schlegel, H. B., et al 2016, Gaus - sian, Inc. 16, Revision C.01 (Wallingford CT: Gaussian, Inc .)

    work page 2016

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    2011, A&A, 530, A26

    Gredel, R., Carpentier, Y ., Rouillé, G., Steglich, M., Huisken, F., & Henning, Th. 2011, A&A, 530, A26

    2011

  2. [10]

    1998, Earth, Moon & Planets, 80 , 179

    Henning, Th., & Schnaiter, M. 1998, Earth, Moon & Planets, 80 , 179

    1998

  3. [11]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 844 Jäger, C., Mutschke, H., Henning, Th., & Huisken, F

    Iida, S., Hu, W ., Zhang, R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 844 Jäger, C., Mutschke, H., Henning, Th., & Huisken, F. 2008, ApJ, 689, 249

    2022

  4. [12]

    1992, ApJ, 393, L79

    Joblin, C., Léger, A., & Martin, P . 1992, ApJ, 393, L79

    1992

  5. [13]

    P ., Tielens, A

    Jones, A. P ., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 740

    1996

  6. [14]

    O., & Gunnarsson, O

    Jones, R. O., & Gunnarsson, O. 1989, RvMP , 61, 689

    1989

  7. [15]

    S., Boone, F

    Laporte, N., Ellis, R. S., Boone, F. 2017 ApJL, 837, L21 Léger, A., & Puget, J. 1984, A&A, 137, L5 Léger, A., Boissel, & d’Hendecourt, L.B. 1988, Phys. Rev. Le tt., 60, 921

    2017

  8. [16]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 339

    Li, A. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 339

    2020

  9. [17]

    2001, ApJ, 554, 778

    Li, A., & Draine, B.T. 2001, ApJ, 554, 778

    2001

  10. [18]

    J., & Li, A

    Li, Q., Y ang, X. J., & Li, A. 2024, MNRAS, 535, L58

    2024

  11. [19]

    J., & Li, A

    Lin, Q., Y ang, X. J., & Li, A. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2380

    2023

  12. [20]

    2008, A&A, 489, 1183

    Malloci, G., Mulas, G., Cecchi-Pestellini, C., & Joblin, C. 2008, A&A, 489, 1183

    2008

  13. [21]

    Marques, M. A. L., Castro, A., Bertsch, G. F., et al. 2003, Com - puter Physics Communications, 151, 60

    2003

  14. [22]

    Marques, M. A. L., & Gross, E. K. U. 2004, ARPC, 55, 427

    2004

  15. [23]

    A., Burkhardt, A

    McGuire, B. A., Burkhardt, A. M., Kalenskii, S., et al. 2018, Science, 359, 202

    2018

  16. [24]

    A., Loomis, R

    McGuire, B. A., Loomis, R. A., Burkhardt, A. M., et al. 2021, Science, 371, 1265

    2021

  17. [25]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 3 2

    Pedrini, A., Adamo, A., Calzetti, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 3 2

    2024

  18. [26]

    2011, ApJ, 728, 154

    Beletsky, Y ., & Song, I.-O. 2011, ApJ, 728, 154

    2011

  19. [27]

    1998, ApJ, 498, 486

    Salama, F. 1998, ApJ, 498, 486

    1998

  20. [28]

    D., Duley, W

    Scott, A. D., Duley, W . W ., & Jahani, H. R. 1997, ApJ, 490, L175

    1997

  21. [29]

    2022, MNR AS, 514, 1886

    Shivaei, I., Boogaard, L., Díaz-Santos, T., et al. 2022, MNR AS, 514, 1886

    2022

  22. [30]

    L., Changala, P

    Sita, M. L., Changala, P . B., Xue, C., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L12

    2022

  23. [31]

    S., Phadke, K

    Spilker, J. S., Phadke, K. A., Aravena, M., et al. 2023, Natur e, 618, 708

    2023

  24. [32]

    Stecher, T. P . 1965, ApJ, 142, 1683

    1965

  25. [33]

    P ., & Donn, B

    Stecher, T. P ., & Donn, B. 1965, ApJ, 142, 1681

    1965

  26. [34]

    2010, ApJ, 712, L16

    Steglich, M., Jäger, C., Rouillé, G., Huisken, F., Mutschke , H., & Henning, T. 2010, ApJ, 712, L16

    2010

  27. [35]

    2012, A&A, 540, A110

    Steglich, M., Carpentier, Y ., Jäger, C., Huisken, F., Räder, H.-J., & Henning, Th. 2012, A&A, 540, A110

    2012

  28. [36]

    H., Bull, J

    Stockett, M. H., Bull, J. N., Cederquist, H., et al. 2023, Nat ure Communications, 14, 395

    2023

  29. [37]

    2008, ARA&A, 46, 289 V alencic, L.A., Clayton, G.C., & Gordon, K.D

    Tielens, A.G.G.M. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 289 V alencic, L.A., Clayton, G.C., & Gordon, K.D. 2004, ApJ, 616 , 912

    2008

  30. [38]

    J., & Li, A

    Wang, Q., Y ang, X. J., & Li, A. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 983

    2023

  31. [39]

    H., Changala, P

    Wenzel, G., Speak, T. H., Changala, P . B., et al. 2024b, Natur e Astronomy, in press (arXiv:2410.00670)

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    2023, Nature, 621, 267 Y ang, X.J., & Li, A

    Witstok, J., Shivaei, I., Smit, R., et al. 2023, Nature, 621, 267 Y ang, X.J., & Li, A. 2023, Nature, 621, 260 Article number, page 7 of 7

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.