pith. sign in

arxiv: 1805.12124 · v1 · pith:5USJBKRHnew · submitted 2018-05-29 · 💻 cs.DL

Better Metrics for Ranking SE Researchers

classification 💻 cs.DL
keywords authorsh-indexmetricmetricsrankingresearchersalternateanalogous
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper studies how SE researchers are ranked using a variety of metrics and data from 35,406 authors of 35,391 papers from 34 top SE venues in the period 1992-2016. Based on that analysis, we: deprecate the widely used "h-index", favoring instead an alternate Weighted Page Rank(PR_W) metric that is somewhat analogous to the PageRank(PR) metric developed at Google. Unlike the h-index, PR_W rewards not just citation counts but also how often authors collaborate. Using PR_W, we offer a ranking of the top 20 SE authors in the last decade.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.