Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 70 references

The Multi-wavelength Extinction Law and its Variation in the Coalsack Molecular Cloud Based on the Gaia, APASS, SMSS, 2MASS, GLIMPSE, and WISE Surveys

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The dust in the starless Coalsack cloud follows R_V = 3.1 in the optical and R_V = 5.5 in the mid-infrared.

desk verdict Solid measurement paper whose headline R_V values are more model-dependent than the text admits; the color-excess ratios and extinction map are the real contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08956 v1 pith:5XMBWYZT submitted 2025-02-13 astro-ph.GA

Juan Deng , Shu Wang , Biwei Jiang , He Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords extinctionlawinterstellardustCoalsackmolecularcloudcolorexcessratioreddeningmid-infraredGaiaDR3dwarfstarsR_V
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the dust in the Coalsack, a nearby quiescent starless cloud, follows the Milky Way's standard diffuse extinction law in the optical and near-infrared ($R_V = 3.1$) but switches to the denser-cloud law in the mid-infrared ($R_V = 5.5$). It derives this from color excesses in 20 bands for 368,524 dwarf stars selected with Gaia DR3, using blue-edge $T_{\rm eff}$--intrinsic-color relations to set the zero-reddening baseline and linear fits to color-excess diagrams for the ratios. The paper also finds that the optical law is nearly uniform across the cloud: for $E(B-V) > 0.3$ mag the average is $R_V = 3.24 \pm 0.32$ with no significant $R_V$--$E(B-V)$ correlation, and it produces a $1.3'$ resolution reddening map that resolves fine cloud structure. If these results hold, a cloud with no star formation nevertheless shows the same environmental split in dust properties as active star-forming clouds, and the optical extinction curve can be treated as constant for reddening corrections in this region.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the blue-edge method for intrinsic colors: in a broad, mostly unreddened reference region (the Intrinsic Colors Region), the bluest 3% of stars in each 100-K $T_{\rm eff}$ bin, restricted to $A_G < 0.05$ mag, are fitted with cubic polynomials to give $T_{\rm eff}$--$C_0$ relations for all 20 bands; these relations convert observed colors into color excesses. The color-excess ratios $k_{\lambda_1} = E_{GRP,\lambda}/E_{GBP,GRP}$ and $k_{\lambda_2} = E_{J,\lambda}/E_{J,K_S}$ come from linear fits to CE--CE diagrams with 0.01-mag binning and iterative 3$\sigma$ clipping, and are converted to $A_\lambda/A_V$ and $A_\lambda/A_{K_S}$ using the anchor ratios of the Wang & Chen (2019) extinction law.

What would settle it

Take a few hundred Coalsack-region dwarfs with independent high-resolution spectroscopy, assign each star its intrinsic color by spectral type, and recompute $E(B-V)$ and $R_V$ from the same photometry; if the resulting $R_V$ disagrees with $3.24 \pm 0.32$ beyond the quoted uncertainties, the blue-edge calibration is the weak point. A second check: re-derive the extinction law using only stars whose line-of-sight reddening from an independent 3D dust map is consistent with zero and see whether the $R_V = 3.1$/5.5 split survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the multi-wavelength extinction law of the Coalsack is not a single curve: over $0.35$--$2.15\,\mu$m the color-excess ratios and relative extinction follow the $R_V = 3.1$ law of the diffuse Galactic interstellar medium, while over $2.15$--$12\,\mu$m the curve flattens and matches the $R_V = 5.5$ model of Weingartner & Draine (2001), the behavior previously seen in active star-forming clouds. Regional comparisons within the survey show the densest inner regions have the lowest $A_\lambda/A_V$ and $A_\lambda/A_{K_S}$ values, diffuse outer regions are flatter still, and the whole cloud sits in between; but despite these infrared variations, $R_V$ converted from color-excess ratios in $0.5^\circ \times 0.5^\circ$ sub-regions shows no strong dependence on $E(B-V)$ above $0.3$ mag, with a Gaussian mean of $R_V = 3.24 \pm 0.32$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on the blue stars used as zero-reddening references being truly unreddened (the bluest 3% in a broad region, with $A_G < 0.05$ mag) and on the cubic fits to their colors giving the correct intrinsic color for every dwarf in the cloud; if those calibrators carry residual reddening, or the fit is biased for the reddened population, every color excess and every $R_V$ value shifts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any object behind or within the Coalsack, optical-NIR reddening corrections can use the standard $R_V = 3.1$ law while MIR corrections should use the flatter $R_V = 5.5$ curve.
  • The absence of star formation in the Coalsack does not prevent the MIR extinction from being flat, so the $R_V = 5.5$ MIR law is not exclusive to active star-forming clouds.
  • The mean $R_V = 3.24 \pm 0.32$ for $E(B-V) > 0.3$ mag means that within this cloud, treating $R_V$ as a constant introduces errors smaller than the quoted scatter.
  • The $1.3'$ $E(B-V)$ map, which agrees with an earlier catalog to 0.03 mag while revealing finer structure, can serve as a higher-resolution reddening reference for the Coalsack region.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the blue-edge calibration is unbiased, the same two-law pattern should appear in other quiescent, starless clouds; finding a quiescent cloud with an optical-NIR law different from $R_V = 3.1$ would show that environment, not star formation, controls the extinction law.
  • The weak spatial anti-correlation between $R_V$ and $E(B-V)$ below 0.3 mag could be a calibration artifact of the blue-edge method rather than a physical dust change; a spectroscopic sample in that low-extinction regime would separate the two.
  • Because the MIR law flattens further in the diffuse reference regions, the dust-grain population in the Coalsack's outer envelope appears at least as processed as in active star-forming clouds, a testable prediction for future observations of ice features and PAH emission.
  • Extending the same analysis to more distant or more embedded stars in the Coalsack would test whether the $R_V = 5.5$ flattening persists into even denser cores or gives way to steeper laws as grain growth proceeds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength (0.35–12 μm) extinction law for the Coalsack molecular cloud, a quiescent starless cloud, using 368,524 Gaia DR3 dwarf stars as tracers and photometry from APASS, SMSS, 2MASS, GLIMPSE and WISE across 20 bands. The authors derive Teff–intrinsic-color relations via the blue-edge method, compute color excesses in each band, fit CE–CE diagrams to obtain color excess ratios (CERs), and convert these to relative extinction Aλ/AV and Aλ/AKS using the Wang & Chen (2019) extinction law. The main results are: (i) the optical–NIR extinction law follows R_V=3.1; (ii) the MIR law is flat and follows WD01 R_V=5.5; (iii) the E(B–V) maps at 1.3' resolution show fine structure and agree broadly with Guo et al. (2022); (iv) there is no strong correlation between R_V and E(B–V) for E(B–V)>0.3 mag, with a mean R_V=3.24±0.32.

Significance. If the results are robust, this is the first comprehensive optical–MIR extinction-law study of a quiescent starless cloud, and the finding that the Coalsack matches R_V=3.1 in the optical–NIR and R_V=5.5 in the MIR, like active star-forming clouds, is an interesting environmental comparison. The 1.3'-resolution extinction map and the multi-band CER catalogue are useful products for the community. The paper includes careful consistency checks: the E(B–V) map agrees with Guo et al. (2022) to ~0.03 mag, and the A_V comparison with Dobashi et al. (2005) is discussed with a plausible explanation. The main caveats are the calibration dependence of the R_V conversion and the small high-extinction samples, which require additional sensitivity analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Figures 2–3] The Teff–C0 relations are built from the bluest 3% of stars in the ICR with AG<0.05 mag, but the ICR (296°≤l≤312°, –5°≤b≤15°) contains the Coalsack cloud itself, so residual reddening in the blue edge cannot be excluded. The uncertainties in Table 2 are only the linear-fit errors and do not include systematic errors from the C0 calibration; the polynomial fits are stated to diverge outside 4500–7000 K, and the u-band deviation discussed in §4.1.1 shows that the blue-edge method produces wavelength-dependent systematics. Please quantify how the CERs (and thus the R_V=3.1 and R_V=5.5 conclusions) shift when C0 is re-derived with, e.g., the bluest 1% or 5% thresholds, or when the Teff scale is shifted by the GSP-Phot median error of 119 K, and add a systematic term to the reported errors.
  2. [§3.3, §4.4, Eqs. (2)–(3)] Equations (2)–(3) convert the measured CERs into Aλ/AV and Aλ/AKS using AGBP/AGRP from WC19, and §4.4 maps CERs to R_V using the WC19/WC23 R_V-dependent family. Consequently, the agreement with R_V=3.1 in the optical-NIR and with R_V=5.5 in the MIR is not an independent test of R_V; it tests consistency with the same model family used for the calibration. The sensitivity is large: for the Coalsack values k_J=0.769 and k_KS=1.165, changing AGBP/AGRP from 1.7 to 1.5 changes AJ/AKS from about 2.7 to about 1.5, which propagates into all Aλ/AKS entries in Table 3 and shifts the inferred MIR R_V. Please report the derived extinction law and R_V for at least one alternative choice of AGBP/AGRP (e.g., HD20 or a WD01 R_V=5.5 curve) and state explicitly that the R_V values are conditional on the adopted calibration.
  3. [§3.2, Table 2] The inner dense region (EGBP,GRP≥1.25 or EJ,KS≥0.5) has very small samples: 10 sources for V, 81–149 for the GLIMPSE and WISE bands, and the W3 Coalsack sample is only 229 sources in total. The fitting procedure keeps all high-extinction points regardless of source count, so the dense-region CERs (e.g., V: –1.050±0.080; H: 0.566±0.050) could be driven by a few outliers. These CERs are the basis for the claimed NIR-MIR regional variation in Fig. 7 and for the weak R_V–EB,V trend in Fig. 11. Please give per-bin source counts, run a robust fit (e.g., median-based or Theil-Sen), and show the dense-region CERs with and without the highest-extinction points; also verify the W3 point with a binned fit.
  4. [§2.3, Table 1] There is a direct inconsistency in the quoted Coalsack sample size: Section 2.3 states 'the final Coalsack, Ref. 1 and Ref. 2 samples contain 4,757, 117,585 and 32,964 stars', but Table 1 lists Coalsack as 14,112 (and Ref. 2 as 32,964). In addition, the Coalsack boundary in the text (299°≤l≤306°, –4°≤b≤2°) differs from Table 1 (l=299°~305.5°, b=–2.8°~2.45°). Please correct the text, make the boundary definition consistent, and confirm which value (4,757 or 14,112) was used in the analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] The notation for color excess is inconsistent: 'EB,V' appears in the abstract while 'E(B–V)' or "E_{B,V}" is used elsewhere; please unify to a single subscripted form.
  2. [Table 2 caption] The caption reads 'Multi-wavelengt Color Excess Ratios'; the typo 'wavelengt' should be corrected to 'wavelength'.
  3. [Table 3 header] The header 'Aλ/Av' should be 'Aλ/AV' (italic V subscript) to match the text.
  4. [§4.3] There is a full-width comma in 'In contrast ，the ADobashi+05 V,mean values'; please use a standard comma.
  5. [§4.4, Figure 13] The reported 'R_V=3.24±0.32' is the mean and dispersion of the sub-region median R_V values, not the uncertainty of the mean; please state this explicitly and consider weighting by the number of stars per sub-region.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Coalsack extinction-law results are based on independently measured color-excess ratios, with model-dependent conversions that do not reduce to their inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central measurements are color excess ratios (CERs) obtained by linear fits to CE–CE diagrams, where the CEs are observed colors minus intrinsic colors derived from the blue-edge method. The intrinsic-color calibration is performed on the bluest 3% of stars with AG<0.05 in an independent Intrinsic Colors Region, not on the high-extinction Coalsack sample used for the extinction-law fits. The conversion from CERs to relative extinction (Eqs. 2–3) is an algebraic identity that uses AGBP/AGRP from Wang & Chen (2019); this is an external published calibration rather than a quantity fit to the Coalsack data. The optical-NIR and MIR conclusions are asserted primarily from the CER comparisons in Figures 6 and 7, which are made before this conversion and are therefore independent of the Wang & Chen normalization. The MIR R_V=5.5 comparison is benchmarked against WD01, not against the self-cited Wang & Chen curves. The R_V estimate in Section 4.4 uses RV-dependent curves from Wang & Chen (2019, 2023) to map measured CERs to R_V; this is standard model-dependent parameter estimation and does not make the R_V value a fitted input renamed as a prediction. No step in the paper reduces an equation to its own input or fits a parameter and then presents a closely related quantity as a prediction. The agreement with external benchmarks (Guo et al. 2022; Dobashi et al. 2005; Zhang & Green 2024) further supports the independence of the measurements. The self-citations to Wang & Chen (2019, 2023) are load-bearing for the conversion but are external results, not circular self-support.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The measurement rests on the blue-edge calibration of intrinsic colors (free parameters and a domain assumption), on external extinction-law models used to convert CERs into relative extinction and R_V (domain assumptions), and on the distance and dwarf selection. No new physical entities are introduced. The most honesty-relevant dependencies are the fitted C0 polynomial coefficients, the hand-chosen blue-edge percentile and dense/diffuse thresholds, and the adoption of Wang & Chen (2019, 2023) curves as the R_V calibration.

free parameters (3)
  • Teff-C0 polynomial coefficients = Not tabulated; relations shown in Figure 2
    Cubic polynomial coefficients relating Teff to intrinsic color C0 for each band and [M/H] bin are fitted to the bluest 3% of ICR stars. All color excesses and CERs are computed relative to these fits, so systematic errors in the coefficients propagate into every extinction ratio.
  • Blue-edge selection percentile (3%) = 3%
    The zero-reddening zero-point is defined by the bluest 3% of stars per 100 K Teff bin. This percentile is chosen by hand; a different percentile shifts C0 and hence all color excesses.
  • Inner dense/diffuse split thresholds = EGBP,GRP=1.25 mag, EJ,KS=0.5 mag
    The inner dense and inner diffuse sub-regions are defined by these hand-chosen thresholds. The claim of regional extinction-law variation depends on this split.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The bluest 3% of stars in each Teff bin of the Intrinsic Colors Region have negligible reddening (AG<0.05 mag), so their observed colors equal intrinsic colors.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 to build the Teff-C0 relations. If these stars are actually reddened, C0 is overestimated and all color excesses are underestimated.
  • domain assumption The Wang & Chen (2019, 2023), Hensley & Draine (2020), and Weingartner & Draine (2001) extinction curves correctly describe the wavelength dependence of extinction for all relevant R_V in the Coalsack.
    Used in Sections 3.3 and 4.4 to convert measured CERs into A_lambda/AV and R_V. The final 'consistent with R_V=3.1/5.5' statement is a comparison against these external models, and the R_V values are calibrated using them.
  • domain assumption Intrinsic colors of dwarf stars in the 4500-7000 K range depend only on Teff and [M/H] within each metallicity bin, with negligible dependence on gravity and other parameters.
    Section 3.1 fits C0 as a function of Teff only, after binning in [M/H]. If the true intrinsic color also depends on logg, metallicity spread within bins, or binarity, the C0 relations are biased.
  • domain assumption All extinction toward the selected dwarf stars within 1 kpc originates in the Coalsack cloud, i.e., no significant background or foreground dust.
    Section 2.3 cuts dwarfs within 1 kpc to minimize background cloud contamination. If distance errors place background stars in the sample, their color excesses are attributed to Coalsack.
  • standard math Least-squares fitting of the binned CE-CE diagrams yields unbiased color-excess ratios when the data are weighted by the binned medians.
    The CERs are slopes of linear fits (Section 3.2). This is standard regression; no issue beyond the binning and clipping choices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Multi-wavelength Extinction Law and its Variation in the Coalsack Molecular Cloud Based on the Gaia, APASS, SMSS, 2MASS, GLIMPSE, and WISE Surveys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5XMBWYZT

@misc{pith2026250208956,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Multi-wavelength Extinction Law and its Variation in the Coalsack Molecular Cloud Based on the Gaia, APASS, SMSS, 2MASS, GLIMPSE, and WISE Surveys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5XMBWYZT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08956}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate interpretation of observations relies on the interstellar dust extinction law, which also serves as a powerful diagnostic for probing dust properties. In this study, we investigate the multi-wavelength extinction law of the quiescent, starless molecular cloud Coalsack and explore its potential variation across different interstellar environments: the surrounding region, the nearby high Galactic latitude region, the inner dense region, and the inner diffuse region. Using a sample of 368,524 dwarf stars selected from Gaia DR3 as tracers, we establish the effective temperature Teff-intrinsic color relations to derive the intrinsic color indices and optical-mid-infrared (MIR) color excess (CE) for 20 bands. Linear fits to the CE-CE diagrams provide color excess ratios (CERs), which are subsequently converted into relative extinction. The resulting extinction curves for different environments exhibit steep slopes in the near-infrared (NIR) and flat profiles in the MIR. In the optical-NIR range, the Coalsack extinction law is consistent with R_V = 3.1 while in the MIR it follows R_V= 5.5 similar to the results of active star-forming clouds. At an angular resolution of 1.3', our extinction map reveals fine cloud structures. No correlation is found between R_V and E(B-V) for E(B-V) > 0.3 mag, implying a uniform optical extinction law in the Coalsack cloud. The derived average R_V value is 3.24.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08956 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The spatial map of the samples covers the Galactic coordinates 296◦ ⩽ l ⩽ 312◦ and −5 ◦ ⩽ b ⩽ 5 ◦ , based on the AV contour map from Dobashi et al. (2005). The Coalsack cloud region is shaded in red, while reference region 1 (Ref. 1) is marked in blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Determination of intrinsic color index C 0 λ1,λ2 using the blue-edge method. Gray dots represent stars with −0.5 ⩽ [M/H] ⩽ 0 dex in Intrinsic Colors Region (296◦ ⩽ l ⩽ 312◦ , −5 ◦ ⩽ b ⩽ 15◦ ) in optical-NIR bands on Teff vs. observed color C obs λ1,λ2 diagram. Light blue crosses denote zero-reddening stars. The blue dashed lines show the Teff–C 0 λ1,λ2 relation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Observed color C obs GBP,GRP vs. Teff diagram for the Intrinsic Colors Region. Dots represent all stars, colored by their reddening EGBP,GRP . The Teff–C 0 λ1,λ2 relations for different [M/H] intervals are shown by blue, cyan, and red dashed lines. The temperature range from 4500K to 7000K defines the reliable interval for calculating C 0 λ1,λ2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: CE-CE diagrams for the Coalsack molecular cloud in four bands (W3, B, u, and v). Red lines are the best-fit linear lines. Gray dots represent all stars, while red dots with error bars show the median values for each bin, with EGBP,GRP and EJ,KS values binned in 0.01 ma…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CE-CE diagrams of EGRP,λ1 vs. EGBP,GRP and EJ,λ2 vs. EJ,KS . Here, λ1 refers to V band from APASS, and g, r, i, z bands from SMSS. λ2 includes J, H, and KS bands from 2MASS; [3.6], [4.5], [5.8], [8.0] bands from GLIMPSE; and W1, W2 bands from WISE. The best-fitting lin…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The top panel shows the optical-NIR CERs vs. λeff diagram, while the bottom panel presents the relative extinction Aλ/AV, with differences from the Coalsack indicated by ∆E and ∆A. Data points from different regions are colored. Yellow dots represent the inner dense re…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The NIR−MIR reddening curves are shown in the upper panels (a) and (b), with the CERs, while the NIR−MIR extinction curves are presented in the lower panels (c) and (d), with Aλ/AKS . Different regions—Coalsack, Ref. 1, Ref. 2, inner dense, and inner diffuse—are repres…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top panel: EB,V diagram for 128,645 stars in the region 296◦ ⩽ l ⩽ 312◦ , −5 ◦ ⩽ b ⩽ 5 ◦ , colored by star number density. The x-axis shows our EB,V values (E thiswork B,V ), while the y-axis shows those from Guo et al. (2022, E Guo+22 B,V ), with a red solid line indi…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spatial distributions of EB,V values from this work E thiswork B,V and Guo et al. (2022, E Guo+22 B,V ) with the residuals (∆ = E thiswork B,V − E Guo+22 B,V ). The number of sources is indicated in bold black text in the top-right corner. Core regions with high extinc…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of AV values between this work (A thiswork V ) and Dobashi et al. (2005, A Dobashi+05 V ) for the same sub-regions within the Coalsack cloud. Red dots indicate the peak AV in each region, with vertical error bars indicating the uncertainties in Dobashi et a…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spatial variation of the extinction law in the Coalsack molecular cloud within the region 296◦ ⩽ l ⩽ 312◦ , −5 ◦ ⩽ b ⩽ 5 ◦ , characterized by RV. The region is divided into 0.5°×0.5° sub-regions based on a grid of Galactic coordinates (l, b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of RV and EB,V in each sub-region of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Distribution of RV in the Coalsack molecular cloud sub-region follows a Gaussian function, with a mean value of RV = 3.24 ± 0.32 for EB,V > 0.3 mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    HBG z_ 7 =7bhԨQAt: S 7 u ͦ,egg+##gl Nz?ydff*==]l>ci h'

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    2023, , 674, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243462

    Andrae , R., Fouesneau , M., Sordo , R., et al. 2023, , 674, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243462

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243462 2023

  5. [5]

    A., Churchwell , E., Babler , B

    Benjamin , R. A., Churchwell , E., Babler , B. L., et al. 2003, , 115, 953, 10.1086/376696

    doi:10.1086/376696 2003

  6. [6]

    2011, , 123, 789, 10.1086/660849

    Bessell , M., Bloxham , G., Schmidt , B., et al. 2011, , 123, 789, 10.1086/660849

    doi:10.1086/660849 2011

  7. [7]

    2011, , 533, A17, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116746

    Beuther , H., Kainulainen , J., Henning , T., Plume , R., & Heitsch , F. 2011, , 533, A17, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116746

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116746 2011

  8. [8]

    J., Sim , M

    Bok , B. J., Sim , M. E., & Hawarden , T. G. 1977, , 266, 145, 10.1038/266145a0

    work page doi:10.1038/266145a0 1977

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    E., & Salim , S

    Butler , R. E., & Salim , S. 2024, , 963, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1753

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    2023, , 945, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/acbbc7

    Cao , Z., Jiang , B., Zhao , H., & Sun , M. 2023, , 945, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/acbbc7

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  4. [12]

    L., Mundy , L

    Chapman , N. L., Mundy , L. G., Lai , S.-P., & Evans , Neal J., I. 2009, , 690, 496, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/496

    2009 doi

  5. [13]

    Chu , L. E. U., & Hodapp , K. W. 2021, , 918, 2, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0ae8

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    L., Meade , M

    Churchwell , E., Babler , B. L., Meade , M. R., et al. 2009, , 121, 213, 10.1086/597811

    2009 doi

  7. [15]

    A., & Megeath , S

    Cohen , M., Wheaton , W. A., & Megeath , S. T. 2003, , 126, 1090, 10.1086/376474

    2003 doi

  8. [16]

    L., Sordo , R., Pailler , F., et al

    Creevey , O. L., Sordo , R., Pailler , F., et al. 2023, , 674, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243688

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    2018, , 614, A19, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732327

    Danielski , C., Babusiaux , C., Ruiz-Dern , L., Sartoretti , P., & Arenou , F. 2018, , 614, A19, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732327

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    E., Bailer-Jones , C

    Dharmawardena , T. E., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Fouesneau , M., et al. 2023, , 519, 228, 10.1093/mnras/stac2790

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    2005, , 57, S1, 10.1093/pasj/57.sp1.S1

    Dobashi , K., Uehara , H., Kandori , R., et al. 2005, , 57, S1, 10.1093/pasj/57.sp1.S1

    2005 doi

  12. [20]

    Draine , B. T. 2003, , 41, 241, 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840

    2003 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R., Bevilacqua , C

    Ducati , J. R., Bevilacqua , C. M., Rembold , S. B., & Ribeiro , D. 2001, , 558, 309, 10.1086/322439

    2001 doi

  14. [22]

    W., Riello , M., De Angeli , F., et al

    Evans , D. W., Riello , M., De Angeli , F., et al. 2018, , 616, A4, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832756

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Fitzpatrick , E. L. 1999, , 111, 63, 10.1086/316293

    1999 doi

  16. [24]

    L., Massa , D., Gordon , K

    Fitzpatrick , E. L., Massa , D., Gordon , K. D., Bohlin , R., & Clayton , G. C. 2019, , 886, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c3a

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    2023, , 674, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243919

    Fouesneau , M., Fr \'e mat , Y., Andrae , R., et al. 2023, , 674, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243919

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Franco , G. A. P. 1989, , 215, 119

    1989

  19. [27]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    W., & Li , A

    Gao , J., Jiang , B. W., & Li , A. 2009, , 707, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/89

    2009 doi

  21. [29]

    C., Sanzovo , G

    Gregorio Hetem , J. C., Sanzovo , G. C., & Lepine , J. R. D. 1988, , 76, 347

    1988

  22. [30]

    L., Chen , B

    Guo , H. L., Chen , B. Q., & Liu , X. W. 2022, , 511, 2302, 10.1093/mnras/stac213

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    H., Woolf , N

    Harris , D. H., Woolf , N. J., & Rieke , G. H. 1978, , 226, 829, 10.1086/156663

    1978 doi

  24. [32]

    2014, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 43, 518

    Henden , A., & Munari , U. 2014, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 43, 518

    2014

  25. [33]

    A., Templeton , M., Terrell , D., et al

    Henden , A. A., Templeton , M., Terrell , D., et al. 2016, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AAVSO Photometric All Sky Survey (APASS) DR9 (Henden+, 2016) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/336. Originally published in: 2015AAS...22533616H

    2016

  26. [34]

    S., & Draine , B

    Hensley , B. S., & Draine , B. T. 2020, , 895, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8cc3

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    2012, , 422, 1263, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20702.x

    Hirashita , H. 2012, , 422, 1263, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20702.x

    2012

  28. [36]

    Knez , C., Boogert , A. C. A., Pontoppidan , K. M., et al. 2005, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 231, Astrochemistry: Recent Successes and Current Challenges, ed. D. C. Lis , G. A. Blake , & E. Herbst , 140

    2005

  29. [37]

    J., Lada , E

    Lada , C. J., Lada , E. A., Clemens , D. P., & Bally , J. 1994, , 429, 694, 10.1086/174354

    1994 doi

  30. [38]

    1997, , 125, 229, 10.1051/aas:1997373

    Lejeune , T., Cuisinier , F., & Buser , R. 1997, , 125, 229, 10.1051/aas:1997373

    1997 doi

  31. [39]

    2024, , 968, L26, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad54c7

    Li , J., Chen , B., Jiang , B., Gao , J., & Chen , X. 2024, , 968, L26, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad54c7

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    2023, Universe, 9, 364, 10.3390/universe9080364

    Li , J., & Chen , X. 2023, Universe, 9, 364, 10.3390/universe9080364

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    2023, , 956, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/aced8a

    Li , L., Wang , S., Chen , X., & Jiang , Q. 2023, , 956, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/aced8a

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    G., & Whittet , D

    Martin , P. G., & Whittet , D. C. B. 1990, , 357, 113, 10.1086/168896

    1990 doi

  35. [43]

    Mathis , J. S. 1990, , 28, 37, 10.1146/annurev.aa.28.090190.000345

    1990

  36. [44]

    2018, , 214, 74, 10.1007/s11214-018-0506-5

    Matsunaga , N., Bono , G., Chen , X., et al. 2018, , 214, 74, 10.1007/s11214-018-0506-5

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    Nyman , L. A . 2008, in Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume II, ed. B. Reipurth , Vol. 5, 222

    2008

  38. [46]

    A., Wolf , C., Bessell , M

    Onken , C. A., Wolf , C., Bessell , M. S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.02015, 10.48550/arXiv.2402.02015

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    H., & Lebofsky , M

    Rieke , G. H., & Lebofsky , M. J. 1985, , 288, 618, 10.1086/162827

    1985 doi

  40. [48]

    F., Meisner , A

    Schlafly , E. F., Meisner , A. M., Stutz , A. M., et al. 2016, , 821, 78, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/78

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    2015, , 577, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425333

    Schultheis , M., Kordopatis , G., Recio-Blanco , A., et al. 2015, , 577, A77, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425333

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    J., & Schmidt-Kaler , T

    Seidensticker , K. J., & Schmidt-Kaler , T. 1989, , 225, 192

    1989

  43. [51]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, , 131, 1163, 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  44. [52]

    2021, , 254, 38, 10.3847/1538-4365/abf929

    Sun , M., Jiang , B., Yuan , H., & Li , J. 2021, , 254, 38, 10.3847/1538-4365/abf929

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    W., Zhao , H., et al

    Sun , M., Jiang , B. W., Zhao , H., et al. 2018, , 861, 153, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac776

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    1973, in Interstellar Dust and Related Topics, ed

    Tapia , S. 1973, in Interstellar Dust and Related Topics, ed. J. M. Greenberg & H. C. van de Hulst , Vol. 52, 43

    1973

  47. [55]

    Versteeg , M. J. F., Angarita , Y., Magalh \ a es , A. M., et al. 2024, , 167, 177, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad2e08

    2024 doi

  48. [56]

    2019, , 877, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1c61

    Wang , S., & Chen , X. 2019, , 877, 116, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1c61

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    2023, , 946, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb647

    ---. 2023, , 946, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb647

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    2024, , 964, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2e98

    ---. 2024, , 964, L3, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2e98

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    W., Li , A., & Chen , Y

    Wang , S., Gao , J., Jiang , B. W., Li , A., & Chen , Y. 2013, , 773, 30, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/30

    2013 doi

  52. [60]

    Wang , S., & Jiang , B. W. 2014, , 788, L12, 10.1088/2041-8205/788/1/L12

    2014 doi

  53. [61]

    W., Zhao , H., Chen , X., & de Grijs , R

    Wang , S., Jiang , B. W., Zhao , H., Chen , X., & de Grijs , R. 2017, , 848, 106, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8db7

    2017 doi

  54. [62]

    C., & Draine , B

    Weingartner , J. C., & Draine , B. T. 2001, , 548, 296, 10.1086/318651

    2001 doi

  55. [63]

    Whittet , D. C. B., Bode , M. F., Longmore , A. J., et al. 1988, , 233, 321, 10.1093/mnras/233.2.321

    1988 doi

  56. [64]

    Whittet , D. C. B., Gerakines , P. A., Hough , J. H., & Shenoy , S. S. 2001, , 547, 872, 10.1086/318421

    2001 doi

  57. [65]

    L., Eisenhardt , P

    Wright , E. L., Eisenhardt , P. R. M., Mainzer , A. K., et al. 2010, , 140, 1868, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  58. [66]

    W., Gao , J., et al

    Xue , M., Jiang , B. W., Gao , J., et al. 2016, , 224, 23, 10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/23

    2016 doi

  59. [67]

    2023, , 264, 14, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9dfa

    Zhang , R., & Yuan , H. 2023, , 264, 14, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9dfa

    2023 doi

  60. [68]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14594, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14594

    Zhang , X., & Green , G. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.14594, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14594

    2024 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    S., & Green , G

    Zhang , X., Hensley , B. S., & Green , G. M. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.23171, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.23171

    2024 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    2024, , 974, 138, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6d64

    Zhao , H., Wang , S., Jiang , B., et al. 2024, , 974, 138, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6d64

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.