pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22521 · v1 · pith:5YEITV75new · submitted 2026-05-21 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.HC

Quantifying Full-Body Immersion

Alihan Bakir , Ekrem Y\"uksel , Fabio Zuliani , Neil Chennoufi , Francesco Bruno , Jamie Paik This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 05:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.HC
keywords full-body immersionmodular roboticshaptic feedbackvirtual environmentsrobotic surfaceskinetic interactionsimmersive technology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modular robotic surface units can deliver full-body physical feedback matching virtual environments at any scale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that full-body immersion arises when modular robotic surfaces distribute force, shape, and motion feedback across entire spaces in real time. This builds on audio-visual and haptic layers to let users interact kinetically with virtual worlds using their whole bodies. A sympathetic reader would see this as a route to experiences where walking through a digital forest feels like stepping on real ground that shifts underfoot, without being confined to headsets or fixed setups.

Core claim

The authors claim that a scalable, distributable platform of modular robotic surface units, inspired by adaptive natural designs, renders immersive environments from personal to multi-user scales. These units integrate dynamic bodily interaction with virtual content by replicating physical characteristics through distributed force, shape, and motion feedback, enabling full-body immersion where users engage symbiotically with the virtual space.

What carries the argument

Modular robotic surface units that adapt in real time to distribute force, shape, and motion feedback throughout a space.

If this is right

  • Immersive setups become possible at scales ranging from single-person rooms to large shared spaces.
  • Users experience real-time physical responses to virtual actions through distributed feedback.
  • Virtual environments can be replicated with consistent physical properties across different locations.
  • Human-virtual coexistence advances through seamless kinetic integration rather than visual or audio alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such surfaces could support physical therapy simulations where patients practice movements against adjustable virtual obstacles.
  • Group training exercises might use one shared robotic floor to let multiple participants affect the same virtual terrain simultaneously.
  • Future versions might combine with motion capture to adjust feedback based on individual body positions and speeds.

Load-bearing premise

That small robotic modules can be networked and controlled to reproduce the exact physical resistance and shape of virtual objects or terrain for freely moving users without lag or gaps.

What would settle it

A prototype test in which a user steps onto a virtual stepping stone and the robotic surface beneath rises to meet the foot with matching height, stiffness, and resistance while the user maintains balance.

read the original abstract

Humanity is at the forefront of yet another digital revolution, where the lines between real and virtual worlds are dissolving, reshaping how we perceive and interact with our surroundings. In this context, we introduce a transformative paradigm for immersive virtual experiences centered around whole-body kinetic interactions. Our approach redefines immersion through three distinct levels: audio-visual immersion, capturing sensory realism; physical immersion, delivering haptic feedback; and full-body immersion (FBI), where dynamic bodily interaction integrates seamlessly with virtual environments. At the core of this innovation lies a scalable, distributable platform based on modular robotic surface units inspired by the adaptive designs of nature. These units enable the rendering of immersive environments at any scale, from intimate personal experiences to expansive multi-user settings, dynamically adapting to interactions in real-time. The modular system distributes force, shape, and motion feedback throughout entire spaces, replicating the physical characteristics of the environment and enabling new depth of engagement through FBI. By combining scalability, adaptability, and dynamic physical engagement, this framework bridges the gap between real and virtual worlds. It offers an unprecedented level of immersion where users can engage their entire bodies in symbiotic interactions with the virtual space. This work not only advances immersive technology but also redefines how humans and virtual environments coexist, setting a foundation for a new era of human-environment synthesis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces full-body immersion (FBI) as a new paradigm extending audio-visual and physical immersion, proposing a scalable, distributable platform of modular robotic surface units inspired by nature. These units are claimed to render force, shape, and motion feedback throughout spaces at arbitrary scales while enabling real-time dynamic adaptation to bodily interactions with virtual environments.

Significance. If the proposed platform could be realized with the claimed properties, it would offer a potentially transformative approach to immersive robotics and VR by supporting whole-body physical engagement at scales from personal to multi-user. The emphasis on nature-inspired modularity and distributability is conceptually appealing, but the manuscript supplies no technical foundation, validation, or analysis to assess whether these benefits are attainable.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The core claim that the modular robotic surface units enable rendering 'at any scale' with 'dynamically adapting to interactions in real-time' and distribution of 'force, shape, and motion feedback throughout entire spaces' is load-bearing for the contribution yet is advanced solely through descriptive assertions without architecture, control laws, material specifications, latency bounds, or feasibility discussion.
  2. Abstract: No experimental methods, simulation results, performance metrics, or validation procedures are provided to support the integration of dynamic bodily interaction with virtual environments, leaving the central feasibility assumption unexamined and the strongest claims unsubstantiated.
minor comments (1)
  1. The distinction between physical immersion and full-body immersion (FBI) is introduced but not delineated with sufficient precision to clarify the incremental contribution of the proposed platform.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to clarify the conceptual scope while adding supporting discussion where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The core claim that the modular robotic surface units enable rendering 'at any scale' with 'dynamically adapting to interactions in real-time' and distribution of 'force, shape, and motion feedback throughout entire spaces' is load-bearing for the contribution yet is advanced solely through descriptive assertions without architecture, control laws, material specifications, latency bounds, or feasibility discussion.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract advances these claims at a high level without technical specifications. The manuscript is positioned as a conceptual framework introducing the full-body immersion paradigm and the nature-inspired modular platform. To address this, we have revised the abstract to qualify the claims as proposed capabilities and added a new section outlining high-level architectural principles, control concepts drawn from distributed robotic systems, candidate materials for the surface units, and feasibility considerations based on existing hardware performance bounds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract: No experimental methods, simulation results, performance metrics, or validation procedures are provided to support the integration of dynamic bodily interaction with virtual environments, leaving the central feasibility assumption unexamined and the strongest claims unsubstantiated.

    Authors: We concur that the manuscript contains no experimental or simulation results, as its focus is on defining the new FBI paradigm rather than presenting a fully engineered system. In revision we have added a dedicated discussion of prospective validation strategies, including simulation frameworks for real-time adaptation and example performance metrics such as latency and spatial force resolution. These are framed as directions for future empirical work rather than completed analyses. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: conceptual proposal lacks equations, fits, or self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper is a high-level conceptual introduction to a modular robotic platform for full-body immersion. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no predictions derived from data subsets, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems. All claims are presented as forward-looking proposals without any derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs by construction. This matches the expected non-circular outcome for descriptive framework papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based solely on abstract; no quantitative parameters, formal axioms, or new entities with independent evidence are specified. The proposal rests on unstated engineering assumptions about real-time robotic control and integration.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Modular robotic units can dynamically adapt force, shape, and motion in real time to match virtual environments at arbitrary scales
    Invoked in the description of the platform's core capabilities without supporting analysis.
invented entities (1)
  • Full-body immersion (FBI) no independent evidence
    purpose: To name and distinguish a new highest level of immersion that integrates whole-body kinetic interactions
    Introduced as a distinct category without reference to prior measurements or validation

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5774 in / 1422 out tokens · 49064 ms · 2026-05-22T05:30:04.322372+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dąbrowska-Żółtak, K., Wojtowicz, J., Wrona, S.: Reconfigurable neighbor- hood—mechatronisationoftheurbandesign.Sustainability13(24),13547(2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    In: HCI Inter- national 2018–Posters’ Extended Abstracts: 20th International Conference, HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part III 20, pp

    Gračanin, D., Eltoweissy, M., Cheng, L., Tasooji, R.: Reconfigurable spaces and places in smart built environments: A service centric approach. In: HCI Inter- national 2018–Posters’ Extended Abstracts: 20th International Conference, HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part III 20, pp. 463–468 (2018). Springer

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(4), 6988–6995 (2020)

    Salerno, M., Paik, J., Mintchev, S.: Ori-pixel, a multi-dofs origami pixel for modular reconfigurable surfaces. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(4), 6988–6995 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Rossignac, J., Borrel, P.: Multi-resolution 3d approximations for rendering com- plexscenes.In:Falcidieno,B.,Kunii,T.L.(eds.)ModelinginComputerGraphics, pp. 455–465. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1993)

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry90(7), 833–836 (2019) 16

    Rognini, G., Petrini, F.M., Raspopovic, S., Valle, G., Granata, G., Strauss, I., Solcà, M., Bello-Ruiz, J., Herbelin, B., Mange, R.,et al.: Multisensory bionic limb to achieve prosthesis embodiment and reduce distorted phantom limb perceptions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry90(7), 833–836 (2019) 16

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    nature Communications15(2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-024-46249-0

    Xia, H., Zhang, Y., Rajabi, N., Taleb, F., Yang, Q., Kragić, D., Li, Z.: Shaping high-performance wearable robots for human motor and sensory reconstruction and enhancement. nature Communications15(2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-024-46249-0

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Multimedia Systems5, 105–112 (1997)

    Maes, P., Darrell, T., Blumberg, B., Pentland, A.: The alive system: Wireless, full-body interaction with autonomous agents. Multimedia Systems5, 105–112 (1997)

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics24(1), 16–24 (2018)

    Robertson, M.A., Murakami, M., Felt, W., Paik, J.: A compact modular soft surface with reconfigurable shape and stiffness. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics24(1), 16–24 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics34(1), 151–165 (2018)

    Zhakypov, Z., Paik, J.: Design methodology for constructing multimaterial origami robots and machines. IEEE Transactions on Robotics34(1), 151–165 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    In: 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environ- ment and Teleoperator Systems, pp

    Cholewiak, S.A., Tan, H.Z., Ebert, D.S.: Haptic identification of stiffness and force magnitude. In: 2008 Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environ- ment and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 87–91 (2008). IEEE

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    Science translational medicine6(222), 222–1922219 (2014)

    Raspopovic,S.,Capogrosso,M.,Petrini,F.M.,Bonizzato,M.,Rigosa,J.,DiPino, G., Carpaneto, J., Controzzi, M., Boretius, T., Fernandez, E.,et al.: Restor- ing natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Science translational medicine6(222), 222–1922219 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Soft Matter (2025)

    Jeong, H., Kim, J., Paik, J.: Low-profile folding mechanism for multi-dof feedback control. Soft Matter (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Nature575(7783), 473–479 (2019)

    Yu, X., Xie, Z., Yu, Y., Lee, J., Vazquez-Guardado, A., Luan, H., Ruban, J., Ning, X., Akhtar, A., Li, D.,et al.: Skin-integrated wireless haptic interfaces for virtual and augmented reality. Nature575(7783), 473–479 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems17, 168–180 (2019)

    Ju, C., Son, H.I.: Evaluation of haptic feedback in the performance of a teleop- erated unmanned ground vehicle in an obstacle avoidance scenario. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems17, 168–180 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    In: Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual EnvironmentandTeleoperatorSystems.HAPTICS2002,pp.24–31(2002).IEEE

    Huang, F., Gillespie, R.B., Kuo, A.: Haptic feedback and human performance in a dynamic task. In: Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual EnvironmentandTeleoperatorSystems.HAPTICS2002,pp.24–31(2002).IEEE

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    IEEE Transactions on Haptics15(2), 382–391 (2021)

    Sullivan, J.L., Pandey, S., Byrne, M.D., O’Malley, M.K.: Haptic feedback based on movement smoothness improves performance in a perceptual-motor task. IEEE Transactions on Haptics15(2), 382–391 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    IEEE Transactions on Haptics6(2), 242–252 (2012)

    Wildenbeest, J.G., Abbink, D.A., Heemskerk, C.J., Van Der Helm, F.C., Boessenkool, H.: The impact of haptic feedback quality on the performance of 17 teleoperated assembly tasks. IEEE Transactions on Haptics6(2), 242–252 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    289–298 (2019)

    Kreimeier, J., Hammer, S., Friedmann, D., Karg, P., Bühner, C., Bankel, L., Götzelmann, T.: Evaluation of different types of haptic feedback influencing the task-basedpresenceandperformanceinvirtualreality.In:Proceedingsofthe12th Acm International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 289–298 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Google Patents (2023)

    Paik, J., Zuliani, F.: Device and system as human interactive surface. Google Patents (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Nature Machine Intelligence1(12), 584–593 (2019)

    Mintchev, S., Salerno, M., Cherpillod, A., Scaduto, S., Paik, J.: A portable three- degrees-of-freedom force feedback origami robot for human–robot interactions. Nature Machine Intelligence1(12), 584–593 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19389 (2025)

    Wang, Z., Demirtas, S., Zuliani, F., Paik, J.: Surface-based manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19389 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Advanced Intelligent Systems7(1), 2400217 (2025)

    Mete, M., Schüßler, A., Taillades, Y., Trivelli, B., Paik, J.: Data-driven kinematic modeling of physical origami robots. Advanced Intelligent Systems7(1), 2400217 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Jiang, Y., El Asmar, S., Wang, Z., Demirtas, S., Paik, J.: Cpg-based manipulation withmulti-moduleorigamirobotsurface.IEEERoboticsandAutomationLetters (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Frontiers in Neuroscience16, 841901 (2022)

    Takahashi, C., Azad, M., Rajasekaran, V., Babič, J., Mistry, M.: Human stiffness perception and learning in interacting with compliant environments. Frontiers in Neuroscience16, 841901 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Journal of Manufacturing Systems62, 234–248 (2022)

    Yun, H., Jun, M.B.: Immersive and interactive cyber-physical system (i2cps) and virtual reality interface for human involved robotic manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems62, 234–248 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol

    Srinivasan, M.A., Beauregard, G.L., Brock, D.L.: The impact of visual infor- mation on the haptic perception of stiffness in virtual environments. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 15281, pp. 555–559 (1996). American Society of Mechanical Engineers

    work page 1996

  27. [27]

    Mechatronics 55, 248–266 (2018)

    Villani, V., Pini, F., Leali, F., Secchi, C.: Survey on human–robot collaboration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications. Mechatronics 55, 248–266 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Nature Machine Intelligence1(12), 584–593 (2019) 18

    Mintchev, S., Salerno, M., Cherpillod, A., Scaduto, S., Paik, J.: A portable three- degrees-of-freedom force feedback origami robot for human–robot interactions. Nature Machine Intelligence1(12), 584–593 (2019) 18

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Advanced Intelligent Systems7(9), 2500142 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202500142 https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aisy.202500142

    Demirtas, S., Oosterhout, A., Kadungamparambil John, R., Paik, J.: Reconfig- urable haptic feedback: Comprehensive design and control framework. Advanced Intelligent Systems7(9), 2500142 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202500142 https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/aisy.202500142

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy.202500142 2025

  30. [30]

    Nature machine intelligence2(8), 437–446 (2020)

    Suzuki, H., Wood, R.J.: Origami-inspired miniature manipulator for teleoperated microsurgery. Nature machine intelligence2(8), 437–446 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Journal of Engineering Design33(12), 969–989 (2022)

    Song, D., Yuan, W., Chao, M., Han, T.: A modular visuo-haptic mixed reality (vhmr)aidedprototypetechniqueforin-vehiclehuman-machineinteraction(hmi) evaluations. Journal of Engineering Design33(12), 969–989 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Technologies 6(4) (2018) https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6040104

    Klein, P., Uhlig, M., Will, H.: The touch and feel of the past—using haptic and vr artefacts to enrich reminiscence therapy for people with dementia. Technologies 6(4) (2018) https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6040104

    work page doi:10.3390/technologies6040104 2018

  33. [33]

    Scientific Reports13(2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32139-w

    Oselinsky, K., Spitzer, A.N., Ortega, F.R., Malinin, L., Curl, K.A., Leach, H.J., Graham, D.J.: Virtual reality assessment of walking in a modifiable urban environment: a feasibility and acceptability study. Scientific Reports13(2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32139-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32139-w 2023

  34. [34]

    Journal of Neurophysiology124(4), 1229–1240 (2020)

    Corniani, G., Saal, H.P.: Tactile innervation densities across the whole body. Journal of Neurophysiology124(4), 1229–1240 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Nature571(7765), 381–386 (2019)

    Zhakypov, Z., Mori, K., Hosoda, K., Paik, J.: Designing minimal and scalable insect-inspired multi-locomotion millirobots. Nature571(7765), 381–386 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Advanced Intelligent Systems 6(3), 2300359 (2024)

    Wang, T., Zheng, P., Li, S., Wang, L.: Multimodal human–robot interaction for human-centric smart manufacturing: A survey. Advanced Intelligent Systems 6(3), 2300359 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Zoelen, E.M.v., Bosch, K.V.d., Rauterberg, M., Barakova, E., Neerincx, M.A.: Identifying interaction patterns of tangible co-adaptations in human-robot team behaviors.FrontiersinPsychology12(2021)https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021. 645545

    work page doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021 2021

  38. [38]

    In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp

    Dongre, P., Manuel, M., Gračanin, D.: Re-imagining indoor space utilization in the covid-19 pandemic with smart re-configurable spaces (sres). In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 85–99 (2021). Springer

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Nature Reviews materials7, 841–843 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41578-022-00501-5

    Pyun, K., Rogers, J., Ko, S.: Materials and devices for immersive virtual reality. Nature Reviews materials7, 841–843 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41578-022-00501-5

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    nature Communications15(2024) https:// 19 doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45059-8

    Luo, Y., Liu, C., Lee, Y., DelPreto, J., Wu, K., Foshey, M., Rus, D., Palacios, T., Li, Y., Torralba, A., Matusik, W.: adaptive tactile interaction transfer via digitally embroidered smart gloves. nature Communications15(2024) https:// 19 doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45059-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45059-8 2024

  41. [41]

    Sci- ence Robotics9(86), 3834 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.adh3834 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/scirobotics.adh3834

    Dafarra, S., Pattacini, U., Romualdi, G., Rapetti, L., Grieco, R., Darvish, K., Milani, G., Valli, E., Sorrentino, I., Viceconte, P.M., Scalzo, A., Traver- saro, S., Sartore, C., Elobaid, M., Guedelha, N., Herron, C., Leonessa, A., Draicchio, F., Metta, G., Maggiali, M., Pucci, D.: icub3 avatar sys- tem: Enabling remote fully immersive embodiment of human...

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adh3834 2024

  42. [42]

    International Journal of Holistic Health, Sports and Recreation2(1), 28–41 (2023)

    ZADIC, A., GROSU, F.E., GROSU, V.T.: The effect of balance training proto- cols on alpine skiing: A systematic review of dry-land and on-snow interventions on balance performance. International Journal of Holistic Health, Sports and Recreation2(1), 28–41 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Journal of sports sciences21(9), 679–692 (2003)

    Müller, E., Schwameder, H.: Biomechanical aspects of new techniques in alpine skiing and ski-jumping. Journal of sports sciences21(9), 679–692 (2003)

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering35(3), 185–191 (2015)

    Hejda, J., Cakrt, O., Socha, V., Schlenker, J., Kutilek, P.: 3-d trajectory of body sway angles: A technique for quantifying postural stability. Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering35(3), 185–191 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    In: Peterson, P., Baker, E., McGaw, B

    Huang, G.-H.: Measure of association. In: Peterson, P., Baker, E., McGaw, B. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Educa- tion (Third Edition), Third edition edn., pp. 260–263. Elsevier, Oxford (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01342-7 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080448947013427 20

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.01342-7 2010