Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 78 references

Effects of task difficulty and music expertise in virtual reality: Observations of cognitive load and task accuracy in a rhythm exergame

T0 review · 5 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a VR rhythm exergame, formal music training predicts higher task accuracy but does not reduce players' subjective cognitive load.

desk verdict A transparent pilot whose central claim needs a repeated-measures reanalysis; the MT-accuracy effect is plausible but not yet supported by the statistics as run. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.06691 v1 pith:5YKN6T4Y submitted 2025-07-09 cs.HC

Kyla Ellahiyoun , Emma Jane Pretty , Renan Guarese , Marcel Takac , Haytham Fayek , Fabio Zambetta This is my paper
classification cs.HC
keywords VirtualRealityExergamesCognitiveLoadMusicTrainingBeatSaberTaskAccuracyElectrodermalActivityGold-MSI
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether musical training changes how much mental effort a rhythm game demands and how accurately people play it. In a within-subjects VR experiment with 32 participants playing Beat Saber at three difficulty levels, the authors find that task difficulty and prior gaming experience predict self-reported cognitive load, while music training does not. Music training does predict task accuracy: the high music-training group scored about 10.5 percentage points higher, even after accounting for difficulty, gaming experience, and physiological arousal. The central claim is that musical expertise sharpens task-specific performance without lowering the subjective sense of effort, possibly through better visual-spatial or motor processing. The authors argue this distinction matters for how expertise is measured and for designing adaptive VR training.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a pair of multimodal linear regression models fitted to within-subjects data from 32 participants. Subjective cognitive load is operationalized by the cognitive subscale of the Video Game Demand Scale; accuracy is the percentage of the maximum possible Beat Saber score; physiological arousal is the number of skin conductance response peaks extracted from an Emotibit sensor and standardized. The predictor set combines task difficulty (easy, normal, hard), music training group (low versus high, split by a single Gold-MSI item on years of formal music theory training), self-reported digital-game and Beat Saber experience, and SCR peaks. The key analytic move is including all of these together so that music training's effect on accuracy is estimated while controlling for difficulty, familiarity, and arousal, while its null effect on subjective load is estimated in a parallel model.

What would settle it

A replication that assigns participants to groups using the full Gold-MSI music training subscale or an objective listening and musical ability test, with a larger sample, would settle whether the accuracy advantage attributed to music training survives; if the advantage disappears when grouping is measured more rigorously, the reported effect is an artifact of the single-item split rather than of musical expertise.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that musical expertise enhances accuracy in a VR rhythm exergame without directly reducing subjective cognitive load. Using two linear regressions, the authors show that self-reported cognitive load (the VGDS cognitive subscale) is driven by task difficulty and gaming experience, not by music training ($\beta = 21.27$, $p = .42$). In contrast, accuracy is significantly predicted by music training group ($\beta = 10.51$, $p = .002$), with the high-training group outperforming the low group across difficulties, alongside subjective cognitive load ($\beta = -0.053$, $p < .001$), gaming experience, and skin-conductance response peaks. The authors interpret this as evidence that music training contributes to performance through enhanced visual-spatial processing or motor coordination rather than through a reduction in perceived mental effort.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a single self-report item about years of formal music theory training reliably separates musically trained from untrained participants; the authors acknowledge in Section 6.4 that this is a deviation from using the full Gold-MSI music training subscale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Task difficulty and gaming experience, not music training, drive subjective cognitive load in VR rhythm games, so adaptive difficulty systems should tune to familiarity rather than musical background.
  • Higher music training predicts better accuracy even after controlling for gaming experience and arousal, pointing to transferable visual-spatial or motor skills that support fast-paced performance.
  • Skin conductance response peaks rise with difficulty and modestly predict accuracy, supporting physiological arousal as a marker of engaged performance in exergames.
  • The lack of a music-training effect on subjective load, despite a performance effect, suggests that expertise can improve outcomes without changing perceived effort, a separation worth testing in other task domains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not test transfer to other VR tasks; if the mechanism is rhythmic visuomotor integration, similar accuracy gains should appear in other fast-paced VR tasks that require timed visuospatial responses, such as target-tracking or reaction-time games.
  • The single-item grouping probably attenuates the estimated effects; using the full Gold-MSI music training subscale or an objective musical ability test could reveal a stronger accuracy effect or expose the current result as a grouping artifact.
  • Participants' qualitative emphasis on flow suggests that flow, rather than cognitive load, may be the state through which music training improves accuracy; adding a flow scale in a replication could clarify the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper reports a within-subjects VR experiment (N=32; 27 with usable EDA) in which participants played three Beat Saber songs selected to represent easy, normal, and hard difficulty, then completed the VGDS cognitive subscale and SSQ while EDA was recorded. Accuracy was normalized as achieved score divided by maximum possible score. Using ANOVAs and OLS regressions, the authors find that task difficulty and gaming/Beat Saber experience significantly predict subjective CL, that musical training (MT) group does not significantly predict CL, but that MT group significantly predicts accuracy (β=10.51, p=.002) after controlling for CL, difficulty, experience, and SCR Peaks. They conclude that musical training enhances task-specific performance without directly reducing subjective CL. The paper is explicitly framed as a pilot study and acknowledges several limitations, including the single-item MT grouping.

Significance. If the MT-accuracy effect were robust, the study would contribute to a growing literature on domain-specific expertise in VR exergames and cognitive load theory, and it would highlight a concrete way to segment players in adaptive VR systems. The paper has real strengths: a transparent protocol, an objectively defined accuracy metric, standardized EDA preprocessing, and candid discussion of limitations in Section 6.4. However, the statistical analysis does not currently support the headline claim because repeated observations are treated as independent, and there are internal inconsistencies in the reported EDA coefficient. These issues are fixable with reanalysis, making the contribution potentially valuable but not yet established. The sample is small and the design confounds difficulty with song identity, so the scope of the claim should be moderated.

major comments (5)
  1. [§5.6, Table 5 (bottom); §5.4] The MT-group effect that anchors the paper's central claim (Table 5, bottom: β=10.51, p=.002) is estimated from 74 condition-level observations contributed by only 27 participants, but the OLS model contains no participant random effect, cluster-robust standard errors, or other repeated-measures correction. Because each participant supplies three accuracy scores and MT group is a between-subjects variable, within-participant residual correlation can seriously deflate the standard error of the MT coefficient; with effective N closer to 27, the reported p-value is not trustworthy. The same issue affects the difficulty ANOVAs in §5.4, which use between-subjects error terms (F(2,93)) for a within-subjects factor. Please reanalyze the data with a mixed-effects model (random intercept for participant) or cluster-robust inference and report whether the MT-accuracy effect survives.
  2. [§5.6, Table 5 (bottom) vs. text] The accuracy model in Table 5 (bottom) reports an SCR Peaks coefficient of 711.38 (SE=346.72, p=.043), while the text in §5.6 reports 'SCR Peaks also contributed modestly to the model (β = 3.39, p = .043)', and Figure 4 implies a slope of roughly 10 percentage points per standardized unit. Since EDA variables were standardized (§4.5.1), a β of 711 on a 0–100 accuracy scale is implausible; one of these values must be a typo. This inconsistency directly affects the paper's third listed contribution about EDA as a physiological predictor of performance and must be corrected.
  3. [§4.2.2, Table 1] Each difficulty condition is a single song (Balearic Pumping, Rum n Bass, POP/STARS, Natural), so 'task difficulty' is fully confounded with song identity, notes per second, BPM, wall/mine counts, and other musical features. The authors claim the songs were distinguishable in difficulty, but that does not separate difficulty from the specific songs chosen. Any effect attributed to difficulty, including the difficulty effects that motivate inclusion of the difficulty predictor in the regressions, could reflect song-specific properties. This limitation should be acknowledged explicitly, or the analysis should treat song as a random effect (which cannot fully solve the confound without multiple songs per level).
  4. [§4.1, §6.4] The MT groups are formed from a single Gold-MSI item about years of formal music theory training, not the full MT subscale. The authors acknowledge this in Section 6.4, and the acknowledgment is to their credit, but the issue is load-bearing because the MT group is the independent variable for the headline accuracy result. If this item does not validly separate trained from untrained participants, the accuracy difference could reflect correlated demographic or experience factors. Please supplement the regression with a sensitivity analysis using a broader music-sophistication score, or at least discuss the direction and likely magnitude of the resulting bias.
  5. [§4.5.2, §5.3] The decision to retain only SCR Peaks from the four EDA indices was made after inspecting multivariate normality and univariate ANOVAs (Section 4.5.2, Section 5.3). This is post-hoc selection on the same data used for the final inference, and it inflates the risk of false positives; no correction for multiple comparisons is reported. Since SCR Peaks enters both final models, the EDA-related claims in the paper should be framed as exploratory, or the analysis should be repeated with all four indices (or a pre-specified composite) to assess robustness.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract; §5.6] The abstract states that musical training significantly predicted 'lower subjective CL', but MT group was not a significant predictor of CL in the final model (p=.42); please reconcile this inconsistency.
  2. [§5.6] The regression summaries report F(6,67) and F(7,66), implying 74 observations, but with 27 participants and 3 conditions one would expect 81; the seven missing observations are not explained. Please clarify exclusions.
  3. [§6.3] 'One regression found that expertise did predict objective CL' is vague; presumably this refers to MT group predicting SCR Peaks in §5.5 (β=-0.54, p=.028), but the sentence could mislead readers into thinking MT predicted subjective CL.
  4. [§4.3] The procedure does not state whether the order of the three difficulty conditions was counterbalanced or randomized; please specify, as order effects could influence both CL and accuracy.
  5. [§5.2] The qualitative results are interesting, but they are reported without a formal coding methodology or inter-rater reliability; this is fine for a pilot, but please label them as informal thematic observations.
  6. [§6.4] The limitation about the sample being 'pilot' is appropriate, but the paper still uses inferential statistics with p-values; please add effect sizes and confidence intervals where reporting null effects (e.g., MT on CL) to help readers judge the strength of evidence.
  7. [Table 2] The cumulative frequency columns are labeled 'cƒ' and 'Perc.'; consider renaming them to 'Cumulative count' and 'Cumulative %' for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the regression claims are estimated from new, independently defined measures; self-citations and in-sample variable selection are not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is an empirical study, not a derivation, and its central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction. Accuracy is independently defined as scored points normalized by the maximum possible score for a song and difficulty (§4.2.2); music training group is a self-report Gold-MSI item acknowledged in §6.4 as a limitation; subjective cognitive load uses the VGDS cognitive subscale; and SCR Peaks come from standard EDA preprocessing. None of these measures is defined in terms of another, so the reported regression coefficients (e.g., MT group β=10.51, p=.002 for accuracy) are not forced by equation identity. The in-sample variable selection in §4.5.2, where SCR Peaks was retained after ANOVAs, is model selection rather than a fitted-input-called-prediction scheme, and the self-citations to Pretty et al. [48–49] are background on EDA/CL measurement, not load-bearing premises: the paper explicitly reports that SCR Peaks did not significantly predict subjective CL in its own model. Concerns about repeated-measures non-independence affect the strength of statistical inference but are not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a small empirical sample and on several measurement and design assumptions: the single-item MT grouping, the post-hoc choice of SCR Peaks, and the song-difficulty confound. No new theoretical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • MT group split cutoff = median split on a single Gold-MSI item (exact threshold not reported)
    Participants were divided into low and high music training groups using one item about years of formal training; the cutoff is a hand-chosen grouping that drives the central accuracy comparison.
  • EDA variable selection (SCR Peaks) = SCR Peaks standardized (z-scores)
    SCR Peaks was chosen as the sole EDA predictor after preliminary ANOVAs and normality checks on the same dataset, so the inclusion of this predictor relies on post-hoc selection.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption EDA SCR Peaks reflect cognitive load or arousal in this task.
    The paper uses SCR Peaks as an objective CL/arousal predictor in the regressions (Sections 4.5, 5.6), citing Pretty et al. without validating it for Beat Saber.
  • standard math VGDS cognitive subscale measures subjective cognitive load.
    Standard instrument with cited reliability; used as the subjective CL outcome.
  • ad hoc to paper Single Gold-MSI training item validly partitions musical expertise.
    The paper itself flags this in Section 6.4 as a deviation from prior practice, making it an assumption specific to this study.
  • ad hoc to paper Songs differ only in task difficulty.
    Each difficulty level uses a different song with different BPM, note density, and obstacles, so the difficulty manipulation is not isolated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effects of task difficulty and music expertise in virtual reality: Observations of cognitive load and task accuracy in a rhythm exergame." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5YKN6T4Y

@misc{pith2026250706691,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effects of task difficulty and music expertise in virtual reality: Observations of cognitive load and task accuracy in a rhythm exergame},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5YKN6T4Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.06691}
}
read the original abstract

This study explores the relationship between musical training, cognitive load (CL), and task accuracy within the virtual reality (VR) exergame Beat Saber across increasing levels of difficulty. Participants (N=32) completed a series of post-task questionnaires after playing the game under three task difficulty levels while having their physiological data measured by an Emotibit. Using regression analyses, we found that task difficulty and gaming experience significantly predicted subjective CL, whereas musical training did not. However, musical training significantly predicted higher task accuracy, along with lower subjective CL, increased gaming experience, and greater physiological arousal. These results suggest that musical training enhances task-specific performance but does not directly reduce subjective CL. Future research should consider alternative methods of grouping musical expertise and the additional predictability of flow and self-efficacy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06691 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left – Superimposed photo of the experimental layout: The screen on the left displays the casting of Beat Saber from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Changes in Task Performance (Accuracy) between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 200 300 400 Easy Normal Hard Task Difficulty Predicted CL (VGDS−Cognitive) 50 100 150 200 250 300 2 4 6 Beat Saber Experience Predicted CL (VGDS−Cognitive) 0 100 200 300 −2 0 2 SCR Peaks Predicted CL (VGDS−Cognitive) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Predicting Accuracy from MT Group, Beat Saber [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    JM Anglin, T Sugiyama, and S-L Liew. 2017. Visuomotor adaptation in head- mounted virtual reality versus conventional training. Scientific reports 7, 1 (2017), 45469

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Sebastian Arndt, Andrew Perkis, and Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons. 2018. Using Virtual Reality and Head-Mounted Displays to Increase Performance in Rowing Workouts. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia Content Analysis in Sports (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (MMSports’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 45–50. doi...

    work page arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Richard C Atkinson and Richard M Shiffrin. 1968. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Psychology of learning and motivation . Vol. 2. Elsevier, 89–195

    work page 1968

  4. [4]

    Alan D Baddeley and J Graham. 1974. HITCH. 1974. Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation 8 (1974), 47–89

    work page 1974

  5. [5]

    David John Baker, Juan Ventura, Matthew Calamia, Daniel Shanahan, and Emily M. Elliott. 2020. Examining musical sophistication: A replication and theoretical commentary on the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index. Musi- cae Scientiae 24, 4 (Dec. 2020), 411–429. doi:10.1177/1029864918811879 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd. Pre-print submitted to VRST ’...

    work page doi:10.1177/1029864918811879 2020

  6. [6]

    Inez E Berends and Ernest CDM Van Lieshout. 2009. The effect of illustrations in arithmetic problem-solving: Effects of increased cognitive load. Learning and Instruction 19, 4 (2009), 345–353

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Nicholas Bowman, Joseph Wasserman, and Jaime Banks. 2018. Development of the Video Game Demand Scale. 208–233. doi:10.4324/9781351235266-13

    work page doi:10.4324/9781351235266-13 2018

  8. [8]

    Nicholas David Bowman, Joseph Wasserman, and Jaime Banks. 2018. Develop- ment of the video game demand scale. In Video games. Routledge, 208–233

    work page 2018

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Alice Bowmer, Kathryn Mason, Julian Knight, and Graham Welch. 2018. Investi- gating the impact of a musical intervention on preschool children’s executive function. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018), 2389

    2018

  2. [10]

    Pablo Campo-Prieto, José María Cancela, and Gustavo Rodríguez-Fuentes. 2021. Immersive virtual reality as physical therapy in older adults: Present or future (systematic review). Virtual Reality 25, 3 (2021), 801–817

    2021

  3. [11]

    Weng, Robert Weisshappel, Edward McAuley, and Arthur F

    Laura Chaddock-Heyman, Psyche Loui, Timothy B. Weng, Robert Weisshappel, Edward McAuley, and Arthur F. Kramer. 2021. Musical Training and Brain Volume in Older Adults. Brain Sciences 11, 1 (Jan. 2021), 50. doi:10.3390/brainsci11010050 Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Dig...

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    Zhong Jian Chee, Yvonne Leung, and Marieke de Vries. 2022. Musical sophistica- tion and its relationship with executive functions, autistic traits, and quality of life. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain 32, 3-4 (2022), 87

    2022

  5. [13]

    Zhong Jian Chee, this link will open in a new tab Link to external site, Yvonne Leung, this link will open in a new tab Link to external site, Marieke de Vries, and this link will open in a new tab Link to external site. 2022. Musical sophistication and its relationship with e...

    2022

  6. [14]

    Fang Chen, Jianlong Zhou, Yang Wang, Kun Yu, Syed Z Arshad, Ahmad Khawaji, and Dan Conway. 2016. Robust multimodal cognitive load measurement. Springer

    2016

  7. [15]

    Michelene TH Chi et al. 1981. Expertise in problem solving. (1981)

    1981

  8. [16]

    Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2000. Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-bass

    2000

  9. [17]

    Joe Cutting, Sebastian Deterding, Simon Demediuk, and Nick Sephton. 2023. Difficulty-skill balance does not affect engagement and enjoyment: a pre- registered study using artificial intelligence-controlled difficulty. Royal Society Open Science 10, 2 (Feb. 2023), 220274. doi:1...

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Hadas Dahary, Tania Palma Fernandes, and Eve-Marie Quintin. 2020. The relation- ship between musical training and musical empathizing and systemizing traits. Musicae Scientiae 24, 1 (March 2020), 113–129. doi:10.1177/1029864918779636 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Don Samitha Elvitigala, Armağan Karahanoğlu, Andrii Matviienko, Laia Turmo Vidal, Dees Postma, Michael D Jones, Maria F. Montoya, Daniel Harrison, Lars Elbæk, Florian Daiber, Lisa Anneke Burr, Rakesh Patibanda, Paolo Buono, Perttu Hämäläinen, Robby Van Delden, Regina Bernhaupt...

    2024

  12. [20]

    Joakim Grant Frederiksen, Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen, Lars Konge, Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen, Morten Nobel-Jørgensen, Flemming Bjerrum, and Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen. 2020. Cognitive load and performance in im- mersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality ...

    2020

  13. [21]

    Stefan Gradl, Bjoern M Eskofier, Dominic Eskofier, Christopher Mutschler, and Stephan Otto. 2016. Virtual and augmented reality in sports: an overview and acceptance study. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adj...

    2016

  14. [22]

    Patricia M Greenfield, Craig Brannon, and David Lohr. 1994. Two-dimensional representation of movement through three-dimensional space: The role of video game expertise. Journal of applied developmental psychology 15, 1 (1994), 87–103

    1994

  15. [23]

    Renan Guarese, Emma Pretty, Aidan Renata, Deb Polson, and Fabio Zambetta

  16. [24]

    Renan Guarese, Ron van Schyndel, and Fabio Zambetta. 2022. Evaluating micro- guidance sonification methods in manual tasks for Blind and Visually Impaired people. In OzCHI ’22: Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference on Human- Computer Interaction. doi:10.1145/3572921.3572929

    2022

  17. [25]

    Adrian M Haith and John W Krakauer. 2018. The multiple effects of practice: skill, habit and reduced cognitive load. Current opinion in behavioral sciences 20 (2018), 196–201

    2018

  18. [26]

    Hart and Lowell E

    Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland, 139–183. doi:10.1016...

    1988 doi

  19. [28]

    Martin Hedlund, Anders Lundström, Cristian Bogdan, and Andrii Matviienko

  20. [29]

    Kuo-Ting Huang. 2020. Exergaming Executive Functions: An Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Cognitive Training for Adults Aged 50 and Older.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 23, 3 (March 2020), 143–149. doi:10.1089/cyber. 2019.0269 Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc....

    2020

  21. [30]

    Roscoe, Mina C

    Wen Huang, Rod D. Roscoe, Mina C. Johnson-Glenberg, and Scotty D. Craig. 2021. Motivation, engagement, and performance across multiple virtual reality sessions and levels of immersion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37, 3 (2021), 745–758. doi:10.1111/jcal.12520 _eprint:...

    2021 doi

  22. [31]

    Raine Kajastila, Leo Holsti, and Perttu Hämäläinen. 2016. The Augmented Climb- ing Wall: High-Exertion Proximity Interaction on a Wall-Sized Interactive Surface. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’1...

    2016

  23. [32]

    Slava Kalyuga and Anne-Marie Singh. 2016. Rethinking the boundaries of cogni- tive load theory in complex learning. Educational Psychology Review 28 (2016), 831–852

    2016

  24. [33]

    Kennedy, Norman E

    Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane, Kevin S. Berbaum, and Michael G. Lilienthal

  25. [34]

    Williams

    David Kirschner and J. Williams. 2013. Experts and Novices or Expertise? Posi- tioning Players through Gameplay Reviews. (Jan. 2013)

    2013

  26. [35]

    Joseph J. LaViola. 2000. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 32, 1 (Jan. 2000), 47–56. doi:10.1145/333329.333344

    2000

  27. [36]

    Joseph J LaViola Jr. 2000. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM Sigchi Bulletin 32, 1 (2000), 47–56

    2000

  28. [37]

    Lemmens and Constantin Freiherr von Münchhausen

    Jeroen S. Lemmens and Constantin Freiherr von Münchhausen. 2023. Let the beat flow: How game difficulty in virtual reality affects flow. Acta Psychologica 232 (Feb. 2023), 103812. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103812

    2023

  29. [38]

    Daniel J Levitin. 2012. What does it mean to be musical? Neuron 73, 4 (2012), 633–637

    2012

  30. [39]

    Regan L Mandryk, Kori M Inkpen, and Thomas W Calvert. 2006. Using psy- chophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & information technology 25, 2 (2006), 141–158

    2006

  31. [40]

    Anna Maria Matziorinis, Christian Gaser, and Stefan Koelsch. 2023. Is musical engagement enough to keep the brain young? Brain Structure and Function 228, 2 (March 2023), 577–588. doi:10.1007/s00429-022-02602-x

    2023 doi

  32. [41]

    Yusuke Miura, Erwin Wu, Masaki Kuribayashi, Hideki Koike, and Shigeo Mor- ishima. 2023. Exploration of Sonification Feedback for People with Visual Impair- ment to Use Ski Simulator. InProceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 2023 (Glasgow, United Kingdom)(...

    2023

  33. [42]

    Roxana Moreno and Richard Mayer. 2007. Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review 19, 3 (Sept. 2007), 309–326. doi:10. 1007/s10648-007-9047-2

    2007

  34. [43]

    Florian Mueller and Katherine Isbister. 2014. Movement-based game guidelines. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems . 2191–2200

    2014

  35. [44]

    Daniel Müllensiefen, Bruno Gingras, Jason Musil, and Lauren Stewart. 2014. The Musicality of Non-Musicians: An Index for Assessing Musical Sophistication in the General Population. PLOS ONE 9, 2 (Feb. 2014), e89642. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0089642 Publisher: Public Library o...

    2014 doi

  36. [45]

    Lennart Erik Nacke, Michael Kalyn, Calvin Lough, and Regan Lee Mandryk

  37. [46]

    Fred GWC Paas and Jeroen JG Van Merriënboer. 1994. Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational psychology review 6 (1994), 351–371

    1994

  38. [47]

    Pretty, Haytham M

    Emma J. Pretty, Haytham M. Fayek, and Fabio Zambetta. 2023. A Case for Personalized Non-Player Character Companion Design. Inter- national Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 0, 0 (March 2023), 1–20. doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2181125 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: http...

    2023

  39. [48]

    Emma J Pretty, Renan Guarese, Chloe A Dziego, Haytham M Fayek, and Fabio Zambetta. 2024. Multimodal Measurement of Cognitive Load in a Video Game Context: A Comparative Study Between Subjective and Objective Metrics. IEEE Music Expertise and Cognitive Load in a VR Rhythm Exerg...

    2024

  40. [49]

    Emma Jane Pretty, Renan Luigi Martins Guarese, Haytham M Fayek, and Fabio Zambetta. 2024. Comparing Subjective Measures of Workload in Video Game Play: Evaluating the Test-Retest Reliability of the VGDS and NASA-TLX. InCompanion Proceedings of the 26th International Conference...

    2024

  41. [50]

    Aidan Renata, Renan Guarese, Marcel Takac, and Fabio Zambetta. 2024. Assess- ment of embodied visuospatial perspective taking in augmented reality: insights from a reaction time task. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 5 (2024), 1422467

    2024

  42. [51]

    Let’s Get Physiological, Physiological!

    Raquel Robinson, Katelyn Wiley, Amir Rezaeivahdati, Madison Klarkowski, and Regan L Mandryk. 2020. " Let’s Get Physiological, Physiological!" A Systematic Review of Affective Gaming. InProceedings of the annual symposium on computer- human interaction in play . 132–147

    2020

  43. [52]

    Rafael Roman-Caballero, Marisa Arnedo, Mónica Triviño, and Juan Lupiáñez

  44. [53]

    Sebastian Rutkowski, Mateusz Adamczyk, Agnieszka Pastuła, Edyta Gos, Carlos Luque-Moreno, and Anna Rutkowska. 2021. Training using a commercial im- mersive virtual reality system on hand–eye coordination and reaction time in young musicians: A pilot study. International journa...

    2021

  45. [54]

    Nedal Sawan, Ahmed Eltweri, Caterina De Lucia, Luigi Pio Leonardo Cavaliere, Alessio Faccia, and Narcisa Roxana Moşteanu. 2021. Mixed and Augmented Reality Applications in the Sport Industry. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd Interna- tional Conference on E-Business and E-Commerc...

    2021

  46. [55]

    Steven Schmidt, Patrick Ehrenbrink, Benjamin Weiss, Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons, Tanja Kojic, Andrew Johnston, and Sebastian Möller. 2018. Impact of virtual environments on motivation and engagement during exergames. In 2018 Tenth international conference on quality of multimedia ...

    2018

  47. [56]

    Sanchez-Vives

    Mel Slater and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives. 2016. Enhancing Our Lives with Im- mersive Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3 (2016). https://www. frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074

    2016

  48. [57]

    Jonathan Steuer, Frank Biocca, Mark R Levy, et al. 1995. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Communication in the age of virtual reality 33, 37-39 (1995), 1

    1995

  49. [58]

    Jessica V Strong and Benjamin T Mast. 2019. The cognitive functioning of older adult instrumental musicians and non-musicians. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 26, 3 (2019), 367–386

    2019

  50. [59]

    John Sweller. 1994. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction 4, 4 (1994), 295–312

    1994

  51. [60]

    John Sweller. 2010. Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review 22, 2 (June 2010), 123–138. doi:10. 1007/s10648-010-9128-5

    2010

  52. [61]

    John Sweller, Paul Ayres, and Slava Kalyuga. 2011. Cognitive Load Theory . Springer New York, New York, NY. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4

    2011 doi

  53. [62]

    John Sweller, Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer, and Fred G. W. C. Paas. 1998. Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review 10, 3 (Sept. 1998), 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205

    1998 doi

  54. [63]

    Marcel Takac, James Collett, Russell Conduit, and Alexander De Foe. 2023. A cognitive model for emotional regulation in virtual reality exposure. Virtual Reality 27, 1 (2023), 159–172

    2023

  55. [64]

    Francesca Talamini, Gianmarco Altoè, Barbara Carretti, and Massimo Grassi

  56. [65]

    Mi Tian, Yuchao Cai, and Jie Zhang. 2023. The Impact of Virtual Reality-Based Products on Mild Cognitive Impairment Senior Subjects: An Experimental Study Using Multiple Sources of Data. Applied Sciences 13, 4 (Jan. 2023), 2372. doi:10. 3390/app13042372 Number: 4 Publisher: Mu...

    2023

  57. [66]

    Claus Toft-Nielsen. 2016. Gaming Expertise: Doing Gender and Maintaining Social Relationships in the Context of Gamers’ Daily Lives. Nordicom Review 37, s1 (2016), 71–83. doi:10.1515/nor-2016-0024 Num Pages: 71-83 Place: Gothenburg, Poland Publisher: De Gruyter Poland

    2016 doi

  58. [67]

    Robby van Delden, Sascha Bergsma, Koen Vogel, Dees Postma, Randy Klaassen, and Dennis Reidsma. 2020. VR4VRT: Virtual Reality for Virtual Rowing Training. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interac- tion in Play (Virtual Event, Canada) (CHI PLA...

    2020

  59. [68]

    Philipp Wintersberger, Andrii Matviienko, Andreas Schweidler, and Florian Michahelles. 2022. Development and Evaluation of a Motion-based VR Bicycle Simulator. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, MHCI, Article 210 (Sept. 2022), 19 pages. doi:10.1145/3546745

    2022 doi

  60. [69]

    Wenge Xu, Hai-Ning Liang, Zeying Zhang, and Nilufar Baghaei. 2020. Studying the Effect of Display Type and Viewing Perspective on User Experience in Virtual Reality Exergames. Games for Health Journal 9, 6 (Dec. 2020), 405–414. doi:10. 1089/g4h.2019.0102 Publisher: Mary Ann Li...

    2020

  61. [70]

    Georgios N Yannakakis, Hector P Martinez, and Maurizio Garbarino. 2016. Psy- chophysiology in games. In Emotion in games: Theory and praxis . Springer, 119–137

    2016

  62. [71]

    Robert M Yerkes, John D Dodson, et al. 1908. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of comparative neurology and psychology 18, 5 (1908), 459–482

    1908

  63. [72]

    Alexander Seeshing Yeung, Putai Jin, and John Sweller. 1998. Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary educational psychology 23, 1 (1998), 1–21

    1998

  64. [73]

    Soojeong Yoo, Phillip Gough, and Judy Kay. 2020. Embedding a VR Game Studio in a Sedentary Workplace: Use, Experience and Exercise Benefits. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing...

    2020

  65. [1993]

    The International Journal of A viation Psychology 3, 3 (July 1993), 203–220

    Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of A viation Psychology 3, 3 (July 1993), 203–220. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3

    1993 doi

  66. [2011]

    In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems

    Biofeedback game design: using direct and indirect physiological control to enhance game interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 103–112

  67. [2017]

    PLOS ONE 12, 10 (Oct

    Musicians have better memory than nonmusicians: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 12, 10 (Oct. 2017), e0186773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186773 Publisher: Public Library of Science

    2017 doi

  68. [2018]

    PloS one 13, 11 (2018), e0207957

    Musical practice as an enhancer of cognitive function in healthy aging-A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one 13, 11 (2018), e0207957

    2018

  69. [2023]

    In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Vienna, Austria) (MUM ’23)

    Jogging-in-Place: Exploring Body-Steering Methods for Jogging in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Vienna, Austria) (MUM ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377–385. doi:10.1...

  70. [2024]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2024)

    Exploring audio interfaces for vertical guidance in augmented reality via hand-based feedback. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.