Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Examining the Robustness of Spiking Neural Networks on Non-ideal Memristive Crossbars

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.09599 v1 pith:5ZAGAFUO submitted 2022-06-20 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords snnscrossbarsmemristivenetworksneuralcrossbarnon-idealperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have recently emerged as the low-power alternative to Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) owing to their asynchronous, sparse, and binary information processing. To improve the energy-efficiency and throughput, SNNs can be implemented on memristive crossbars where Multiply-and-Accumulate (MAC) operations are realized in the analog domain using emerging Non-Volatile-Memory (NVM) devices. Despite the compatibility of SNNs with memristive crossbars, there is little attention to study on the effect of intrinsic crossbar non-idealities and stochasticity on the performance of SNNs. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the robustness of SNNs on non-ideal crossbars. We examine SNNs trained via learning algorithms such as, surrogate gradient and ANN-SNN conversion. Our results show that repetitive crossbar computations across multiple time-steps induce error accumulation, resulting in a huge performance drop during SNN inference. We further show that SNNs trained with a smaller number of time-steps achieve better accuracy when deployed on memristive crossbars.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools