pith. sign in

arxiv: 1504.04904 · v3 · pith:65PQJYE5new · submitted 2015-04-20 · 🧮 math.NT · math.CA· math.CO

Difference Sets and Polynomials

classification 🧮 math.NT math.CAmath.CO
keywords resultsmathbbcdotsdifferencesdotsformintersectivepolynomials
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We provide upper bounds on the largest subsets of $\{1,2,\dots,N\}$ with no differences of the form $h_1(n_1)+\cdots+h_{\ell}(n_{\ell})$ with $n_i\in \mathbb{N}$ or $h_1(p_1)+\cdots+h_{\ell}(p_{\ell})$ with $p_i$ prime, where $h_i\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ lie in in the classes of so-called intersective and $\mathcal{P}$-intersective polynomials, respectively. For example, we show that a subset of $\{1,2,\dots,N\}$ free of nonzero differences of the form $n^j+m^k$ for fixed $j,k\in \mathbb{N}$ has density at most $e^{-(\log N)^{\mu}}$ for some $\mu=\mu(j,k)>0$. Our results, obtained by adapting two Fourier analytic, circle method-driven strategies, either recover or improve upon all previous results for a single polynomial. UPDATE: While the results and proofs in this preprint are correct, the main result (Theorem 1.1) has been superseded prior to publication by a new paper ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01760 ) that provides better results with considerably less technicality, to which the interested reader should refer.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.