pith. sign in

arxiv: 2209.02161 · v1 · pith:6775ZPCYnew · submitted 2022-09-05 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.MM

Comparative Study of AR Versus Image and Video for Exercise Learning

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.MM
keywords learningmobileexerciseparticipantsapplicationarfitexercisesimage-based
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

There is inadequate attention to using mobile Augmented Reality (AR) in fitness, despite mobile AR being easy to use, requiring no extra cost, and can be a powerful learning tool. In this work, we present a mobile AR application that can help users learn exercises with a virtual personal trainer. We conduct a user study with 10 participants to investigate the learning quality of the ARFit (i.e., the proposed mobile AR application) in comparison to traditional methods such as Image-based learning and Video-based learning. Our results indicate that participants have a higher learning quality of exercise with mobile AR than (1) Image-based learning among all exercises selected and (2) video-based learning with exercise that requires greater spatial knowledge, with the performance evaluated by a qualified personal trainer. In addition, ARFit has an excellent rating in usability, is deemed to be highly acceptable, and is the preferred exercise learning method by most participants (N=9)

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.