Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comment on 'Spin Ice: Magnetic Excitations without Monopole Signature Using $\mu$SR' (arXiv:1110.0877)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1111.4168 v1 pith:67E3CFM2 submitted 2011-11-17 cond-mat.str-el

classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords spindynamicsmagneticmonopolearxivbramwellco-workerscomment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dunsiger and co-workers have criticised our paper on magnetic monopole dynamics spin ice [S. T. Bramwell et al., Nature, 461 956 (2009)]. We consider their criticisms and results but show that these do not warrant any revision of our earlier conclusions. In contrast, we point out that their conclusion of a `new' type of spin dynamics in spin ice is inconsistent with established facts.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools