pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.04698 · v2 · pith:67LBTQDInew · submitted 2024-01-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Caustic and hydrostatic mass bias: Implications for modified gravity

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords causticmassgravityhydrostatictechniqueanalysisbiasclusters
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We propose and perform a joint analysis of the two different mass estimates of galaxy clusters, namely the hydrostatic and caustic techniques. Firstly, we show comprehensively that the mass bias between these two techniques can be possibly alleviated when cluster-specific assumptions constrained using the hydrostatic technique are utilized within the caustic technique. While at face value this demotes the caustic technique from a completely independent method, this allows one to further tighten the constraints on the cluster mass and subsequently, allow us to test modifications to gravity. Implementing the aforementioned formalism for two well-observed massive galaxy clusters, A2029 and A2142, we highlight the proof of concept. In the current implementation, we use this method to constrain the Chameleon screening and Vainshtein screening. As anticipated, we show that the joint analysis can help improve the constraints on these modified gravity scenarios.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CLASH-VLT: The Fifth Force in Chameleon Gravity from Joint Lensing and Kinematics Cluster Mass Profiles

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Joint lensing-kinematics analysis of nine CLASH clusters constrains chameleon gravity, yielding GR-consistent bounds for NFW and Hernquist profiles and |f_R| ≲ 2-5×10^{-5} for f(R) models.