Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mock Observations: Morphological Analysis of Galaxies in TNG100 Simulations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.18042 v3 pith:6A3CDOEC submitted 2025-04-25 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxiesmorphologicaldistributionsgalaxymockobservationalobservationsparameter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In this study, we investigate the morphology of galaxies in the TNG100 simulation by applying mock observation techniques and compare the results with the observational data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). By employing a hierarchical Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) approach, we classify galaxies into four morphological categories (Ellipticals, S0/a, Sab/Sb, and Sc/Sd/Irregulars). Our findings show that the morphological characteristics of the mock-observed galaxy samples closely match those observed in the SDSS, successfully reproducing key features such as distinct parameter distributions for different types. However, some discrepancies are identified: notably, a significant lack of early-type galaxies (ETGs) in the dwarf galaxy regime ($M_* < 10^{10} M_{\odot}$) and minimal distinction between Sab/Sb and Sc/Sd/Irregular galaxies in the mock-observed samples, unlike the clear differences seen in actual observations. These divergences may stem from simulation properties such as elevated star formation efficiency at low mass end or resolution limits. Observational effects, including the impact of the Point Spread Function, sky background, and instrumental noise, can independently cause approximately 7.87\% morphological misclassifications by our CNN model. Compared to previous studies using gravity-based definitions of galaxies that failed to clearly distinguish the parameter distributions of ETGs versus Late-Type Galaxies, our brightness-based sample definition method better recovers the observed morphological parameter distributions, especially their distinct differences. Our study underscores that, alongside mock observations, employing galaxy segmentation methods consistent with observational practices is crucial for appropriately recovering realistic morphological parameters from simulations and enabling fair comparisons.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Galaxy Morphology Classification: Are Stellar Circularities Enough?

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using IllustrisTNG circularity catalogs, the authors show that a disk fraction threshold of Fdisk=0.25 separates early- and late-type galaxies well enough to recover the morphology-density relation at z=0.

Pith tools