Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 27 references

Centimetre-Scale Micro-Transfer Printing to enable Heterogeneous Integration of Thin Film Lithium Niobate with Silicon Photonics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Micro-transfer printing can now place centimetre-long thin-film lithium niobate onto silicon nitride, preserving 0.9 dB/cm loss and giving a 3.2 V modulator at 35 GHz.

desk verdict A genuine centimetre-scale transfer-printing advance and a working 3.2 V modulator, but the 0.9 dB/cm loss claim rests on a fragile cut-back fit. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15157 v2 pith:6A4CTL3B submitted 2024-12-19 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Margot Niels , Tom Vanackere , Tom Vandekerckhove , Stijn Poelman , Tom Reep , Günther Roelkens , Maximilien Billet , Bart Kuyken This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph PACS 42.82.-m42.79.Hp
keywords micro-transferprintingthin-filmlithiumniobatesiliconnitrideheterogeneousintegrationMach-Zehndermodulatorelectro-opticmodulationpropagationlossCMOS-compatiblephotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that micro-transfer printing can pick up and place centimetre-long slabs of thin-film lithium niobate onto a silicon nitride photonic chip without wrecking the material's optical or electro-optic properties. The authors demonstrate propagation loss around 0.9 dB/cm and coupling loss of 1.8 dB per facet for printed coupons, and they build a 1 cm push-pull Mach-Zehnder modulator with Vπ = 3.2 V and a flat response up to at least 35 GHz. If correct, this removes the length bottleneck that previously limited transfer-printed lithium niobate to millimetre-scale devices, opening a path to low-voltage modulators and efficient nonlinear devices on mature CMOS-compatible platforms.

What carries the argument

The enabling mechanism is micro-transfer printing with resist tethers: LN coupons are suspended by photoresist over an undercut oxide, picked up with a PDMS stamp retracted at 500 mm/s, and released on the target at 4 µm/s, requiring no recess etching or pillars on the target wafer. The photonic design uses a hybrid mode in which the SiN waveguide guides 32% of the light and the overlying LN slab guides 62%, so the LN contributes electro-optic tuning without needing etched LN waveguides.

What would settle it

Measure the propagation loss using a method that does not assume identical coupling per coupon, for example by comparing the loaded quality factors of ring resonators that share the same printed LN coupling section but have different resonator lengths, or by repeating the cut-back with multiple fresh coupons of each length; if the slope changes beyond the stated ±0.8 dB/cm uncertainty or the 1 cm single coupon deviates from the chain of 1 mm coupons, the hybrid-mode-overlap assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports that micro-transfer printing can pick up and place thin-film lithium niobate coupons up to 1 cm long onto a silicon nitride chip, and that these printed coupons retain useful optical and electro-optic performance: propagation loss about 0.9 ± 0.8 dB/cm at 1550 nm, transition loss 1.8 ± 0.2 dB per facet, and, in a 1 cm push-pull Mach-Zehnder modulator, Vπ = 3.2 V (VπL = 3.2 V.cm) with a flat electro-optic response up to at least 35 GHz. The authors state that this is the lowest Vπ yet reported for a micro-transfer-printed modulator and that the 35 GHz response shows the printing does not degrade the high-speed properties of LN.

Load-bearing premise

The 0.9 dB/cm loss value rests on the assumption that every printed coupon has the same hybrid mode profile, so only the coupon length varies between cut-back structures; if the LN-to-SiN gap, film thickness, or facet quality differs from coupon to coupon, the linear fit is biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Centimetre-long printed LN makes low-voltage modulators and long-interaction nonlinear devices on SiN practical without wafer bonding.
  • The measured VπL of 3.2 V.cm puts micro-transfer printing on par with die-to-wafer bonding (2.9 V.cm) for LN-on-SiN modulators.
  • The flat electro-optic response up to 35 GHz means the printed interface itself does not set a speed limit for data-communication use.
  • Using resist tethers rather than LN tethers and avoiding recess etching makes the process more compatible with standard semiconductor fabs.
  • Printing coupons in opposite poling directions enables push-pull configurations and opens electrode designs such as GSSG for differential drive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the loss can be lowered by improving the encapsulation-removal step, printed cm-scale LN could approach the loss and voltage figures of monolithic LNOI while riding on mature SiN foundry platforms.
  • Because the length bottleneck is gone, the same printing process should make high-efficiency periodically poled LN frequency converters on SiN, where conversion efficiency scales with the square of the interaction length.
  • A natural testable extension is to shrink the electrode gap or increase the LN fraction of the hybrid mode; the paper's own simulation method predicts a correspondingly smaller VπL.
  • The coupon-chain approach also hints that multiple different active materials could be co-printed on one SiN target, but that goes beyond what this work demonstrates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the micro-transfer printing of centimetre-long (up to 1 cm) thin-film lithium niobate coupons onto a silicon nitride photonic platform. The authors characterize the optical losses using cut-back and coupon-chain test structures, reporting a propagation loss of approximately 0.9 dB/cm and a transition loss of 1.8 ± 0.2 dB per facet. They then integrate 1-cm-long coupons into a push-pull Mach-Zehnder modulator, extracting a Vπ of 3.2 V (VπL = 3.2 V.cm) from low-speed measurements and observing electro-optic response up to 35 GHz. The central claim is that micro-transfer printing can now place centimetre-scale TFLN on SiN without sacrificing the electro-optic performance of LN, enabling efficient modulators and nonlinear devices on CMOS-compatible platforms.

Significance. If the reported results are secure, this work represents a meaningful advance in heterogeneous integration, extending micro-transfer printed LN devices from millimetre to centimetre scale and demonstrating a VπL comparable to wafer-bonded LN-on-SiN modulators. The use of resist tethers and the absence of pre-processing on the target wafer are practical advantages that improve the CMOS-compatibility of the approach. The paper's strengths include a direct demonstration of printing 1-cm-long coupons, the integration of these coupons into functional modulator structures, and the explicit measurement of high-speed electro-optic modulation. However, the loss characterization and the Vπ extraction have uncertainties that need to be addressed before the quantitative claims are fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 5.b] The cut-back extraction of 0.9 ± 0.8 dB/cm propagation loss rests on the assumption that the only variable between structures is the LN length. The paper itself reports a transition-loss scatter of ±0.2 dB per facet (Fig. 5.a) and excludes one damaged structure from the fit. Because each coupon contributes two transitions, a ±0.2 dB/facet variation injects ±0.4 dB per structure, which is roughly four times the expected 0.09 dB propagation loss for the 1-mm coupon. The slope of the linear fit is therefore highly sensitive to coupon-to-coupon variations in facet quality, gap, or film thickness, and the reported interval (0.1–1.7 dB/cm) does not securely support the 'low-loss' claim. Please provide the per-structure data and a quantitative sensitivity analysis of the fit to transition-loss scatter.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 7.d] The half-wave voltage Vπ = 3.2 V is extracted from a single 100-Hz measurement with no repeated traces, no error bar, and no explicit algorithm for reading Vπ from the normalized transmission-voltage curve. The agreement with a simulated VπL of 3.2 V.cm is presented as confirmation, but that simulation uses an overlap factor Γ = 0.42 as an input; thus the comparison is a consistency check, not an independent validation. Please report the measurement uncertainty and details of the extraction method.
  3. [Section 4, Fig. 8.b] The claim of modulation up to at least 35 GHz depends on a de-embedding procedure that is not described in the text; the reader is only told that a commercial modulator (Fujitsu FTM7937EZ) replaces the DUT and probes to extract the setup contribution. Without the reference modulator's frequency response and the de-embedding equation, it is not possible to assess how much of the measured response is due to the DUT. Please provide the de-embedding details and the reference calibration data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Fig. 1] The second and third process steps are both labeled '(b)' in the figure; please renumber the panels consistently.
  2. [Section 3] The determination of the 16.9 dB reference loss at 1550 nm from the no-coupon chain is not described; please state how this value was obtained from the wavelength sweeps.
  3. [Section 5] The discussion states 'up to 1 dB/cm' additional loss, while the abstract and conclusion report 'around 0.9 dB/cm' and the fitted value is 0.9 ± 0.8 dB/cm; please make these statements consistent and quote the uncertainty.
  4. [Table 1, Ref. [26]] Reference [26] is listed with '(n.d.)'; please complete the citation with full bibliographic information.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims rest on direct measurements and a stated mode-overlap simulation, not on fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central results (cm-scale printing, 0.9 dB/cm propagation loss, 1.8 dB/facet transition loss, Vπ = 3.2 V, and modulation beyond 35 GHz) are obtained from direct optical and electrical measurements. The cut-back loss extraction (Section 3, Fig. 5.b) fits a slope to measured transmission versus LN length, while the coupon-chain measurement (Fig. 5.c) independently yields the transition loss; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The VπL comparison to 3.2 V.cm is presented as a consistency check: Γ = 0.42 is defined as the optical/electrical mode overlap and obtained from a mode simulation following [16], not inferred from the measured Vπ. Prior papers by the same group are cited for the printing process and for explaining the low-frequency roll-off, but those citations are not load-bearing for the demonstrated loss, voltage, or bandwidth. The acknowledged exclusion of one cracked coupon and the ±0.8 dB/cm uncertainty are experimental limitations; they raise correctness risk but do not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard material properties, a simulated mode profile, and several measurement assumptions. The only modeled input that directly enters the headline VπL comparison is the overlap factor Gamma = 0.42; the hybrid-mode power fractions are simulation outputs used to interpret loss. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Electro-optic mode overlap Gamma = 0.42
    Used to compute the simulated VπL of 3.2 V.cm. The paper states the value but does not show how it is derived, making the measured/simulated agreement partly a consistency check with a modeled input.
  • Hybrid mode power fractions = 32% SiN / 62% LN
    Mode simulation outputs used to interpret the loss measurements. If the actual mode profile differs, the propagation loss attribution changes.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Lithium niobate has a strong Pockels coefficient and intrinsic chi(2) nonlinearity.
    Used in the introduction to motivate integrating LN onto SiN. Standard material property from prior literature.
  • domain assumption The hybrid mode is guided by the SiN waveguide with the simulated 32% SiN / 62% LN power distribution.
    Invoked in Section 3 (Fig. 4.c) to interpret loss data and in Section 4 to compute the modulator overlap.
  • domain assumption Transition losses are identical for all coupon lengths in the cut-back and chain measurements.
    Required for the linear fit in Fig. 5.b to attribute the slope to propagation loss. Any variation would bias the result.
  • domain assumption The de-embedding procedure using a commercial modulator isolates the device-under-test response.
    Used in Section 4 (Fig. 8) to obtain the 35 GHz response. If the reference modulator setup differs from the DUT path, the de-embedded response is distorted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Centimetre-Scale Micro-Transfer Printing to enable Heterogeneous Integration of Thin Film Lithium Niobate with Silicon Photonics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6A4CTL3B

@misc{pith2026241215157,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Centimetre-Scale Micro-Transfer Printing to enable Heterogeneous Integration of Thin Film Lithium Niobate with Silicon Photonics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6A4CTL3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15157}
}
read the original abstract

The integrated photonics CMOS-compatible silicon nitride (SiN) platform is praised for its low propagation loss, but is limited by its lack of active functionalities such as a strong Pockels coefficient and intrinsic \c{hi}(2) nonlinearity. In this paper, we demonstrate the integration of centimetre-long thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) devices on a SiN platform using the micro-transfer printing (uTP) method. At a wavelength of 1550 nm, propagation losses of approximately 0.9 dB/cm and transition losses of 1.8 dB per facet were measured. Furthermore, the TFLN was integrated into an imbalanced push-pull Mach-Zehnder modulator, achieving a V{\pi} of 3.2 V. The electro-optics nature of the observed modulation is confirmed by measuring the device up to 35 GHz, showing that the printing does not affect the high-speed LN properties.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Micro- transfer printed thin-film lithium niobate modulator for heterogeneous Si photonic platform,

    T. Murai, R. Kou, C. Guangwei, M. Imai, K. Takabayashi, N. Mitamura, S. Akiyama, and K. Yamada, "Micro- transfer printed thin-film lithium niobate modulator for heterogeneous Si photonic platform," (n.d.)

    work page

  2. [1]

    Review of Silicon Photonics Technology and Platform Development,

    S. Y . Siew, B. Li, F. Gao, H. Y . Zheng, W. Zhang, P. Guo, S. W. Xie, A. Song, B. Dong, L. W. Luo, C. Li, X. Luo, and G.-Q. Lo, "Review of Silicon Photonics Technology and Platform Development," J. Light. Technol. 39, 4374–4389 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [2]

    The Past, Present, and Future of Silicon Photonics,

    R. Soref, "The Past, Present, and Future of Silicon Photonics," IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12, 1678– 1687 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [3]

    Silicon Nitride in Silicon Photonics,

    D. J. Blumenthal, R. Heideman, D. Geuzebroek, A. Leinse, and C. Roeloffzen, "Silicon Nitride in Silicon Photonics," Proc. IEEE 106, 2209–2231 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    High density lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits,

    Z. Li, R. N. Wang, G. Lihachev, J. Zhang, Z. Tan, M. Churaev, N. Kuznetsov, A. Siddharth, M. J. Bereyhi, J. Riemensberger, and T. J. Kippenberg, "High density lithium niobate photonic integrated circuits," Nat. Commun. 14, 4856 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Expanding the Silicon Photonics Portfolio With Silicon Nitride Photonic Integrated Circuits,

    A. Rahim, E. Ryckeboer, A. Z. Subramanian, S. Clemmen, B. Kuyken, A. Dhakal, A. Raza, A. Hermans, M. Muneeb, S. Dhoore, Y . Li, U. Dave, P . Bienstman, N. Le Thomas, G. Roelkens, D. V an Thourhout, P. Helin, S. Severi, X. Rottenberg, and R. Baets, "Expanding the Silicon Photonics Portfolio With Silicon Nitride Photonic Integrated Circuits," J. Light. Tech...

    work page 2017

  7. [6]

    Filling the gap of silicon nitride photonic platform functionalities u sing micro -transfer printing,

    M. Billet, T. Vanackere, T. V andekerckhove, M. Niels, L. Reis, D. Maes, M. Kiewiet, K. Akritidis, S. Cuyvers, S. Poelman, T. Reep, V . B. Oliva, F. Leo, G. Roelkens, and B. Kuyken, "Filling the gap of silicon nitride photonic platform functionalities u sing micro -transfer printing," in Advanced Photonics Congress 2023 (Optica Publishing Group, 2023), p. ITu2A.2

    work page 2023

  8. [7]

    Silicon Photonics: silicon nitride versus silicon -on-insulator,

    R. Baets, A. Z. Subramanian, S. Clemmen, B. Kuyken, P. Bienstman, N. Le Thomas, G. Roelkens, D. Van Thourhout, P. Helin, and S. Severi, "Silicon Photonics: silicon nitride versus silicon -on-insulator," in Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OSA, 2016), p. Th3J.1

    work page 2016

Show all 27 references
  1. [8]

    Linear Electro-optic Effect in Silicon Nitride Waveguides Enabled by Electric-Field Poling,

    B. Zabelich, E. Nitiss, A. Stroganov, and C.-S. Brès, "Linear Electro-optic Effect in Silicon Nitride Waveguides Enabled by Electric-Field Poling," ACS Photonics 9, 3374–3383 (2022)

    2022

  2. [9]

    Integrated lithium niobate electro -optic modulators operating at CMOS -compatible voltages,

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams -Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P . Winzer, and M. Lončar, "Integrated lithium niobate electro -optic modulators operating at CMOS -compatible voltages," Nature 562, 101–104 (2018)

    2018

  3. [10]

    Reduced material loss in thin-film lithium niobate waveguides,

    A. Shams-Ansari, G. Huang, L. He, Z. Li, J. Holzgrafe, M. Jankowski, M. Churaev, P. Kharel, R. Cheng, D. Zhu, N. Sinclair, B. Desiatov, M. Zhang, T. J. Kippenberg, and M. Lončar, "Reduced material loss in thin-film lithium niobate waveguides," APL Photonics 7, 081301 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    A heterogeneously integrated lithium niobat e-on-silicon nitride photonic platform,

    M. Churaev, R. N. Wang, A. Riedhauser, V . Snigirev, T. Blésin, C. Möhl, M. H. Anderson, A. Siddharth, Y . Popoff, U. Drechsler, D. Caimi, S. Hönl, J. Riemensberger, J. Liu, P . Seidler, and T. J. Kippenberg, "A heterogeneously integrated lithium niobat e-on-silicon nitride ph...

    2023

  5. [12]

    Room-temperature transfer bonding of lithium niobate thin film on micromachined silicon substrate with Au microbumps,

    R. Takigawa, E. Higurashi, T. Suga, and T. Kawanishi, "Room-temperature transfer bonding of lithium niobate thin film on micromachined silicon substrate with Au microbumps," Sens. Actuators Phys. 264, 274 –281 (2017)

    2017

  6. [13]

    Heterogeneous integration of lithium niobate and silicon nitride waveguides for wafer-scale photonic integrated circuits on silicon,

    L. Chang, M. H. P . Pfeiffer, N. V olet, M. Zervas, J. D. Peters, C. L. Manganelli, E. J. Stanton, Y . Li, T. J. Kippenberg, and J. E. Bowers, "Heterogeneous integration of lithium niobate and silicon nitride waveguides for wafer-scale photonic integrated circuits on silicon,"...

    2017

  7. [14]

    Wafer -scale heterogeneous integration of thin film lithium niobate on silicon -nitride photonic integrated circuits with low loss bonding interfaces,

    S. Ghosh, S. Yegnanarayanan, D. Kharas, M. Ricci, J. J. Plant, and P. W. Juodawlkis, "Wafer -scale heterogeneous integration of thin film lithium niobate on silicon -nitride photonic integrated circuits with low loss bonding interfaces," Opt. Express 31, 12005 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    High - Performance Electro-Optic Modulator on Silicon Nitride Platform with Heterogeneous Integration of Lithium Niobate,

    Z. Ruan, K. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Fan, R. Gan, L. Qi, Y . Xie, C. Guo, Z. Yang, N. Cui, and L. Liu, "High - Performance Electro-Optic Modulator on Silicon Nitride Platform with Heterogeneous Integration of Lithium Niobate," Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2200327 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    A heterogeneously integrated silicon photonic/lithium niobate travelling wave electro-optic modulator,

    N. Boynton, H. Cai, M. Gehl, S. Arterburn, C. Dallo, A. Pomerene, A. Starbuck, D. Hood, D. C. Trotter, T. Friedmann, C. T. DeRose, and A. Lentine, "A heterogeneously integrated silicon photonic/lithium niobate travelling wave electro-optic modulator," Opt. Express 28, 1868 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    100 GHz bandwidth, 1 volt integrated electro-optic Mach–Zehnder modulator at near-IR wavelengths,

    F. V aldez, V . Mere, and S. Mookherjea, "100 GHz bandwidth, 1 volt integrated electro-optic Mach–Zehnder modulator at near-IR wavelengths," Optica 10, 578 (2023)

    2023

  11. [18]

    Present and future of micro -transfer printing for heterogeneous photonic integrated circuits,

    G. Roelkens, J. Zhang, L. Bogaert, E. Soltanian, M. Billet, A. Uzun, B. Pan, Y . Liu, E. Delli, D. Wang, V . B. Oliva, L. T. Ngoc Tran, X. Guo, H. Li, S. Qin, K. Akritidis, Y . Chen, Y . Xue, M. Niels, D. Maes, M. Kiewiet, T. Reep, T. V anackere, T. Vandekerckhove, I. L. Lufun...

    2024

  12. [19]

    Reliable micro -transfer printing method for heterogeneous integration of lithium niobate and semiconductor thin films,

    T. V andekerckhove, T. V anackere, J. De Witte, S. Cuyvers, L. Reis, M. Billet, G. Roelkens, S. Clemmen, and B. Kuyken, "Reliable micro -transfer printing method for heterogeneous integration of lithium niobate and semiconductor thin films," Opt. Mater. Express 13, 1984 (2023)

    2023

  13. [20]

    Photonic integration of lithium niobate micro -ring resonators onto silicon nitride waveguide chips by transfer -printing,

    Z. Li, J. A. Smith, M. Scullion, N. K. Wessling, L. J. McKnight, and M. D. Dawson, "Photonic integration of lithium niobate micro -ring resonators onto silicon nitride waveguide chips by transfer -printing," Opt. Mater. Express 12, 4375 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Realization of a micro-cavity via the integration of Silicon Nitride and Lithium Niobate using micro transfer printing,

    A. Ananthachar, M. Kotlyar, S. Ghosh, S. Dwivedi, S. Iadanza, L. O’Faolain, S. Arafin, and B. Corbett, "Realization of a micro-cavity via the integration of Silicon Nitride and Lithium Niobate using micro transfer printing," in Optica Advanced Photonics Congress 2022 (Optica P...

    2022

  15. [22]

    Heterogeneous Integration of Lithium Niobate and Silicon Photonics for Nonlinear Optics,

    A. M. Palici, X. Lu, K. Srinivasan, X. Lu, F. Labbe, Y . Ding, H. Laroque, R. Hamerly, C. Errando-Herranz, M. Pu, D. Englund, and M. Heuck, "Heterogeneous Integration of Lithium Niobate and Silicon Photonics for Nonlinear Optics," in CLEO 2024 (Optica Publishing Group, 2024), ...

    2024

  16. [23]

    Micro-transfer Printed Thin Film Lithium Niobate (TFLN) -on-Silicon Ring Modulator,

    Y . Tan, S. Niu, M. Billet, N. Singh, M. Niels, T. Vanackere, J. Van Kerrebrouck, G. Roelkens, B. Kuyken, and D. V an Thourhout, "Micro-transfer Printed Thin Film Lithium Niobate (TFLN) -on-Silicon Ring Modulator," ACS Photonics 11, 1920–1927 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    High -Efficiency Second Harmonic Generation in Heterogeneously -Integrated Periodically -Poled Lithium Niobate on Silicon Nitride,

    T. Vandekerckhove, T. Vanackere, J. De Witte, I. L. Lufungula, E. Vissers, G. Roelkens, S. Clemmen, and B. Kuyken, "High -Efficiency Second Harmonic Generation in Heterogeneously -Integrated Periodically -Poled Lithium Niobate on Silicon Nitride," in 2023 Conference on Lasers ...

    2023

  18. [25]

    Heterogeneous integration of a high -speed lithium niobate modulator on silicon nitride using micro -transfer printing,

    T. Vanackere, T. V andekerckhove, L. Bogaert, M. Billet, S. Poelman, S. Cuyvers, J. Van Kerrebrouck, A. Moerman, O. Caytan, N. Singh, S. Lemey, G. Torfs, P. Ossieur, G. Roelkens, S. Clemmen, and B. Kuyken, "Heterogeneous integration of a high -speed lithium niobate modulator o...

    2023

  19. [27]

    Micro - Transfer Printing of Lithium Niobate on Silicon Nitride,

    T. Vanackere, M. Billet, C. O. De Beeck, S. Poelman, G. Roelkens, S. Clemmen, and B. Kuyken, "Micro - Transfer Printing of Lithium Niobate on Silicon Nitride," in 2020 European Conference on Optical Communications (ECOC) (IEEE, 2020), pp. 1–4

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.