REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 10 cited by
Four Lectures on Scalar Curvature
T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read A four-lecture survey argues that scalar curvature bounds leave topology flexible but impose definite limits, and that all known limits are set by Dirac index theory and geometric measure theory.
desk verdict A candid survey of scalar curvature geometry that earns its keep through honest caveats, not new theorems; the n≥8 dependence is real but declared. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The two load-bearing objects are the twisted Dirac operator and the stable $\mu$-bubble. The Dirac side is the identity $D^2=\nabla^*\nabla+\tfrac14\mathrm{Sc}$ (the S-L-W-B formula): it makes positive scalar curvature and harmonic spinors mutually exclusive, so any nonzero index, carried for example by an almost flat unitary bundle induced by an $\varepsilon$-Lipschitz map, becomes a topological obstruction to $\mathrm{Sc}>0$. The geometric-measure-theory side is the second variation formula for stable minimal hypersurfaces $Y\subset X$, $$\int_Y |d\psi|^2+\tfrac12\bigl(\mathrm{Sc}_Y-\mathrm{Sc}_X-|A|^2\bigr)\$psi^{2}$\ge 0,$$ which for $\mathrm{Sc}_X>0$ yields positivity of $-\Delta+\tfrac12\mathrm{Sc}_Y$; via the Kazdan-Warner conformal change this gives $\mathrm{Sc}>0$ on $Y$, and via the warped-product symmetrization $Y^\rtimes=Y\times T^N$ with metric $h+\sum_i\phi_i^2\,dt_i^2$ it converts an eigenfunction of $-\Delta+\tfrac12\mathrm{Sc}$ into a metric on the stabilized manifold with $\mathrm{Sc}=2\lambda$. The $\mu$-bubble generalization prescribes $\mathrm{mean.curv}=\mu$, adapting the descent to bands, boundaries, and corners.
What would settle it
Find a codimension-one area-minimizing hypersurface in an 8-dimensional manifold, satisfying the hypotheses of the cited theorems, whose singular set cannot be desingularized while preserving the scalar-curvature descent; such an example would restore the old dimension restrictions and break the all-dimension formulations.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
On its own terms, the paper's central claim is structural: although scalar curvature is the weakest of the three curvature notions, an average rather than a control of sectional curvatures, the conditions $\mathrm{Sc}\ge\sigma$ and $\mathrm{Sc}>0$ genuinely constrain geometry and topology, and every understood constraint funnels through two mechanisms. The first is the Schr\"odinger-Lichnerowicz-Weitzenb\"ock-Bochner identity $D^2=\nabla^*\nabla+\tfrac14\mathrm{Sc}$ together with the Atiyah-Singer index theorem: a nonzero index forces a harmonic spinor, while $\mathrm{Sc}>0$ forbids one. The second is the second-variation calculus of stable minimal hypersurfaces and $\mu$-bubbles, which descends positivity of scalar curvature to hypersurfaces and, after conformal or warped-product modification, to lower-dimensional witnesses. The paper presents the resulting theorems: torus and aspherical non-existence, domination obstructions, sharp map inequalities, band-width bounds, and rigidity under $\mathrm{Sc}\ge0$, as pieces of one picture, and states the $[\mathrm{Sc}\not>0]$ principle as its main conjecture.
Load-bearing premise
Several stated theorems in all dimensions depend on the desingularization theorems for minimal hypersurfaces in dimensions $n\ge8$, whose proofs the author says he has not verified in depth; if those proofs fail, the dimension restrictions return.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Uniform limits of smooth metrics with $\mathrm{Sc}\ge\sigma$ again have $\mathrm{Sc}\ge\sigma$ when the limit is smooth; the inequality is C$^0$-closed, while metrics with $\mathrm{Sc}\le\sigma$ are C$^0$-dense.
- Closed manifolds admitting a nonzero-degree map to the $n$-torus, and more generally the classes detected by $\mu$-bubble descent and the quasi-symplectic class, carry no metric with $\mathrm{Sc}>0$; with the cited desingularization inputs this holds in all dimensions, not only $n\le7$.
- Complete non-compact manifolds are also constrained: the torus is not dominated by any complete manifold with $\mathrm{Sc}>0$, so ends and punctured subdomains obstruct positive scalar curvature.
- Quantitative map estimates follow: for spin manifolds with $\mathrm{Sc}>0$, maps to spheres and to convex hypersurfaces cannot be too length- or area-contracting once metrics are normalized by scalar curvature, yielding extremality and rigidity statements.
- Rigidity is inherited from non-existence: where $\mathrm{Sc}>0$ is impossible, the borderline case $\mathrm{Sc}\ge0$ often forces the manifold to be flat, via Kazdan's deformation theorem and splitting arguments.
Reading between the lines
- The local dihedral-angle criterion suggests testing whether $\mathrm{Sc}\ge0$ can be defined purely metrically, for continuous or Lipschitz metrics, by the absence of arbitrarily small mean-convex cubical domains with acute dihedral angles; the paper itself raises this as an open problem.
- The warped $T^N$-symmetrization hints at a reduction principle: scalar-curvature questions on invariant toral extensions reduce to the base, which could be checked on the paper's unresolved example of a warped product over a hyperbolic 3-manifold with $\mathrm{Sc}\ge-6$.
- If the two-tools thesis is correct, progress on the main domination conjecture should come either from new index-theoretic cycles or from extending minimal-hypersurface regularity; a genuinely third mechanism would not just prove a new theorem but change the map of the subject.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper is an expanded lecture-notes survey, in seven sections, of the geometry and topology of Riemannian manifolds with scalar curvature bounded below. It argues that the apparent flexibility of such manifolds is limited by two analytic tools: index theory for Dirac operators and geometric measure theory via minimal hypersurfaces and stable µ-bubbles. The paper surveys classical results (Lichnerowicz, Hitchin, Schoen–Yau, Gromov–Lawson, Llarull, and others), sketches proof strategies, and formulates many open problems and conjectures. It also contains a number of statements described as new, such as comparison inequalities for cubical and ball-like domains, Sc-normalized extremality theorems, and refinements involving warped products and µ-bubbles.
Significance. If the survey's map of the field is accurate, it will be a valuable reference for researchers in scalar curvature geometry and adjacent fields. Its strengths include explicit labeling of many statements as conjectural or provisional, candid disclaimers where the author has not personally verified technical proofs (for example, Section 1.5 footnote 26, Section 2.7 remark (c), and Section 3.1 remark (c)), and a substantial amount of self-contained background on curvature formulas, Clifford algebras, and Dirac operators. The paper also proposes many concrete open problems and conjectures, which gives it utility beyond its expository content.
major comments (3)
- [§1.5(ii), §2.7, §3.1(c)] Several central statements about manifolds with Sc > 0 are presented without dimension restrictions, even though the proofs given in the text cover only n ≤ 7 (or n ≤ 9 in one Lipschitz statement) and the removal of the n ≤ 7 barrier depends on desingularization results in [SY(singularities) 2017] and [Lohkamp(smoothing) 2018] that the author says he has not studied in depth. For example, Section 2.7 states the torus corollary — a closed orientable n-manifold mapping with non-zero degree to T^n admits no metric with Sc > 0 — as an unconditional statement, while the author's own caveats in Section 1.5 footnote 26 and Section 2.7(c) indicate that the n ≥ 8 case rests on papers the author cannot vouch for. Since the survey's central deliverable is an accurate map of what is known versus what is open, each such statement should carry an explicit qualifier such as "unconditional for n ≤ 7; for n ≥ 8 conditional on the desingularization theorems of Schoen–Yau and Lohkamp," or at least a back-reference to the caveat. This is load-bearing because the introduction's thesis is meant to cover the higher-dimensional cases as well.
- [Introduction/Abstract] The abstract and introduction claim that the paper presents "some new geometric constraints," but no passage explicitly lists which statements are new to this paper as opposed to expository. This makes it difficult to evaluate the paper's novelty claim and to check whether the new material is correctly attributed. Please add a short paragraph or table in the introduction identifying the statements that the author regards as new (for example, the ∎-inequality and its comparison versions, the Sc-normalized convex area extremality theorem, and the µ-bubble estimates), and state for each whether it is proved in full, proved only as a sketch, or conjectural.
- [§3.3 and §3.3.2] The provisional proposition on profinitely hyperspherical spin manifolds is explicitly described as "convincing but it is not quite a proof," and the later "conclusion of the proof" in Section 3.3.2 relies on an "obvious smoothing" that is asserted to make the correction term Δ◽_ε tend to zero "in the strongest conceivable sense." As written, the relevant analytic estimates are not supplied, so the proposition remains a proof sketch rather than a complete proof. Since this proposition underpins the Dirac-theoretic half of the paper's central thesis, the text should either provide the missing estimates or explicitly mark the proposition, and all later uses of it, as a proof sketch rather than a fully proved theorem.
minor comments (4)
- [§1.6.4] The sentence "this needs additional analytical work to be extended to n ≥ 7" appears to be a typo: the stated theorem is for n ≤ 7, so the extension issue concerns n ≥ 8.
- [§3.1.1] The list of conditions for reflection orbifolds is numbered ●1, ●4, and ●<2, with the intermediate numbers missing; this appears to be a numbering or typesetting error that should be corrected.
- [Throughout] There are numerous small typos and typesetting artifacts, such as "Poof of ∆-Lemma" in Section 2.9, "Metics" in the title of Section 3.17, and repeated words such as "the the". A careful copy-edit would materially improve readability.
- [References and notation] The citation style uses abbreviated labels such as [G(inequalities) 2018] and [SY(singularities) 2017], and some cross-references appear as "??". Please ensure that the bibliography is complete and that all internal references resolve correctly; a notation index for the ad-hoc symbols (∎, ☀, /enc-99) would also help readers.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the survey is carried by independently established index-theoretic and geometric-measure-theory results, with self-citations serving as pointers rather than as load-bearing assumptions.
full rationale
This is a survey and lecture-note paper, not a derivation whose conclusions coincide with its inputs. The central constraints (the ∎-inequality, the /enc-99-inequality, the 2π/n inequality, the torus non-existence results, the SYS-manifold obstructions) are quoted or sketched from standard index-theoretic and GMT sources: Lichnerowicz, Hitchin, Atiyah-Singer, Schoen-Yau, Gromov-Lawson, Lohkamp, Smale, Zhu, Goette-Semmelmann, Llarull, and others. Where the author invokes his own prior work (e.g., [G(billiards) 2014], [G(inequalities) 2018], [GL(complete) 1983], [GL(spin) 1980]), those citations point to externally falsifiable geometric theorems with stated assumptions, not to definitions of the target statement, and the paper's claims do not reduce to those citations by construction. The most reliability-sensitive passages are explicitly flagged by the author as involving external results he has not mastered: Sec. 1.5 footnote 26 ('I can't vouch for the proof') and Sec. 1.6.2 footnote 41 and Sec. 3.1 remark (c) concerning desingularization theorems in [SY(singularities) 2017] and [Lohkamp(smoothing) 2018]. These are correctness risks for the statements in dimensions n ≥ 8, not instances of circularity: the arguments depend on results of other authors that are not derived from the paper's own claims. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's own prior work to forbid alternatives, and no result is defined in terms of its own conclusion. Thus, modulo the cited external theorems, the derivation chain is self-contained and not circular.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- standard math Standard Riemannian geometry and the definition of scalar curvature as sum of sectional curvatures
- standard math Atiyah-Singer index theorem for Dirac operators and the Lichnerowicz formula D^2 = ∇^2 + Sc/4
- domain assumption Existence and regularity of volume minimizing hypersurfaces (Federer-Fleming) and of µ-bubbles
- domain assumption Desingularization results for minimal hypersurfaces in dimensions n ≥ 8 (SY(singularities) 2017, Lohkamp(smoothing) 2018)
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Four Lectures on Scalar Curvature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6DX23NL4
@misc{pith2026190810612,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Four Lectures on Scalar Curvature},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6DX23NL4}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10612}
}
read the original abstract
We overview main topics and ideas in spaces with their scalar curvatures bounded from below, and present a more detailed exposition of several known and some new geometric constraints on Riemannian spaces implied by the lower bounds on their scalar curvatures
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
Positive scalar curvature and isolated conical singularity
A Geroch-type obstruction is proven: connected sums with tori admit no positive scalar curvature metric with isolated conical singularities, and any nonnegative scalar curvature such metric must be flat and extend smoothly.
-
The Rosenberg $ \mathbb{S}^{1} $-Stability Conjecture for $ \chi(X) = 0 $
For closed oriented manifolds X with dim X ≥ 5 and χ(X)=0, the Rosenberg S¹-stability conjecture holds: X × S¹ admits a PSC metric if and only if X does.
-
Connected sum of manifolds with spectral Ricci lower bounds
Connected sums preserve the spectral Ricci bound lambda1(-gamma Delta + Ric) > lambda for n >= 3 and gamma > (n-1)/(n-2), and this range is sharp.
-
Abstract cone operators and Lipschitz rigidity for scalar curvature on singular manifolds
Odd-dimensional Llarull rigidity holds for Lipschitz area non-increasing maps and for manifolds with cone-like singularities, proved via spherical suspension and abstract cone operators.
-
Codimension 2 drawstrings with scalar curvature lower bounds
Kazaras and Xu construct drawstring metrics along arbitrary codimension-2 submanifolds with scalar curvature almost bounded below, yielding new collapsed limits and a claimed but flawed Llarull counterexample.
-
Spectral comparison results for the $N$-Bakry-Emery Ricci tensor
The authors establish diameter and global weighted volume comparison theorems for manifolds with a positive spectral lower bound on the N-Bakry-Emery Ricci tensor.
-
A sharp spectral splitting theorem
If a complete noncompact n-manifold with at least two ends satisfies lambda1(-gamma Delta + Ric) >= 0 for some gamma < 4/(n-1), then it splits isometrically as R x N with compact N and Ric_N >= 0; the constant is sharp.
-
On the rigidity of manifolds with respect to Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities
Certain Gagliardo-Nirenberg and unweighted Yamabe-type constant comparisons force open Riemannian sets to be flat.
-
Scalar and Mean Curvature Comparison on Compact Cylinder
On a compact cylinder X×I with positive scalar curvature and nonnegative mean curvature, the angle condition guarantees existence of a metric with positive scalar curvature on X, forcing negative mean curvature if X a...
-
Preserving curvature lower bounds when Ricci flowing non-smooth initial data
A survey of results on Ricci flow from non-smooth initial data, focusing on preservation of lower curvature bounds and open problems.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
In particular, if Y is ˜◻⊥-spread infinite then also Y is ˜◻⊥-spread infinite
If the inclusion homomorphism π1(Y ) →π1(X) is injective, then ˜◻⊥(X) ≥ ˜◻⊥(Y ). In particular, if Y is ˜◻⊥-spread infinite then also Y is ˜◻⊥-spread infinite . 340 (8) Let X be a connected complete non-compact manifold and Y ⊂X be a compact connected ◻–spread infinite submanifold of codimension 2, such that the inclusion homomorphism π1(Y ) →π1(X) is inject...
work page 2017
-
[2]
And, in general, if a homology class h is representable by a simply connected cycle in X, that is if h is equal to the image of a class ˜h ∈Hn−k( ˜X) under (the homology homomorphism induced by) the universal covering m ap ˜X →X, then ˜◻⊥˜(h) = ˜◻⊥(h). Say that X is ˜◻⊥-spread infinite or that X has infinite ˜◻⊥-spread if ˜◻⊥(X) = ∞, and observe that this p...
work page 2018
-
[3]
(Could the areas be replaced by something like 2-waists of ∂Ui?) I.E. Since the scalar curvature is additive under finite Riemanni an products it is tempting to extend the idea to infinite products and iter ated fibrations, and to find geometric meaning of the inequality Sc ≥σ for infinite dimensional Hilbertian manifolds, such as spaces of maps between Rieman...
work page 2014
-
[4]
yields similar monotonicity for maps between ellips oids with principal axes di and d′ i, and between solids and ellipsoids. (H) Questions. Is there an "effective" set of inequalities between the num- bers di and d′ i necessary and sufficient for the existence of an (affine) isomet ric embedding from solid to solid, ⨉i[0,di] → ⨉i[0,d ′ i], and from ellipsoid t...
work page 2021
-
[5]
(c) If the boundary of X is mean convex, mean.curv(∂Xx ) ≥ 0 andSc(≥ −1, then the proof of /BX , which delivers area minimizing surface in the class h ∈ H2(X,∂side, provide a non-trivial lower bound on the area-norm of this class. But , it is unclear what should be a correct version of /BX for n ≥ 3, where Sc(X) /uni2271.⊗lt10 and/or mean.curv(∂X ) /uni22...
-
[6]
of this criterion in the spirit (2≤0) in section 3.1.1. (e) Formulate and proof the version of this for Sc ≥ σ < 0 by taking into account the area of S ⊂X . 7.3 Width, Waist and other Slicing Invariants Given numerical invariantINV ofk-dimensional spacesY , one defines the "slic- ing version " of INV for n-dimensional X, n ≥k, as the infimum of the num- ber...
work page 2011
-
[7]
as being smooth generic or piece-wise real ana- lytic.444 Z2-Waist and the Even Degree Problem
However, (non-trivial) sharp bounds on the waist, such as waistk(Sn) =volk(Sk) for unit spheres, have been proved only under annoying, probably unnecessary , assumptions on f , such, e.g. as being smooth generic or piece-wise real ana- lytic.444 Z2-Waist and the Even Degree Problem. The known proof of the lower bounds on waists of manifolds X, such as rec...
work page 2007
-
[8]
348 Spherical Waists with the the Dirac operator
444See [G(filling) 1983], [G(waist) 2003], [Guth (waist) 2014] , [Akopyan-Karasev( tight esti- mate) 2016], [Akopyan-Karasev(non-radial Gaussian) 2019 ], [Klartag(waists) 2017]. 348 Spherical Waists with the the Dirac operator. The sharp parametric area contraction theorem from section 3.4.3 implies the sharp lo wer bound on the spherical waists of N -sphe...
work page 1983
Show all 34 references
-
[9]
Lipschitz Suspension Lemma
Below is a partial result in this direction slightly general izing that in § 9 3 11 [G(positive) 1996]. Lipschitz Suspension Lemma. Let a Riemannian manifold X contain a double sequence of triples of disjoint (m − 1)-cycles, i.e. of oriented (m − 1)-dimensional sub-pseudomanif...
1996
-
[10]
The inclusion Γ ⊂ π1(X) implies that the universal covering Z of the surface with the fundamental group Γ admits an LSLU embedding to the universal covering ˜X of X
Proof. The inclusion Γ ⊂ π1(X) implies that the universal covering Z of the surface with the fundamental group Γ admits an LSLU embedding to the universal covering ˜X of X. Hence, RadLip 2 ( ˜X) = ∞. On the other hand, an easy argument (see § 9 3 11 [G(positive) 1996] and [G(a...
1996
-
[11]
353 Exercise
QED. 353 Exercise. Extend all 5d-results from section 3.10.3 to (5 +m − 1)-manifolds X, which admit maps of non-zero degree to uniformly contracti ble (and uni- formly rationally acyclic) manifolds X (and pseudomanifolds with at most 2- dimensional singularities), where the fu...
2018 arXiv
-
[12]
1976] M. F. Atiyah. Elliptic s, discrete groups and von Neu- mann algebras. pages 43-72. Ast«erisque, No. 3233,
1976
-
[20]
Gromov 101 Questions, Problems and Conjectures around Scalar Curvature
https://www.ihes.fr/~gromov/wp-content/uploads/2018 /08/SymbolicDynamicalCategories.pdf [G(101) 2017] M. Gromov 101 Questions, Problems and Conjectures around Scalar Curvature. (Incomplete and Unedited Version) https://www.ihes.fr/~gromov/wp-content/uploads/2018 /08/101-proble...
1976 arXiv
-
[29]
Miao, Nonexistence of NNSC fill-ins with large mean curvature ¯arXiv:2009.04976 [Min-Oo(hyperbolic) 1989] M
[Miao(nonexistence of fill-ins) 2020] P. Miao, Nonexistence of NNSC fill-ins with large mean curvature ¯arXiv:2009.04976 [Min-Oo(hyperbolic) 1989] M. Min-Oo, Scalar curvature rigidity of asymp- totically hyperbolic spin manifolds , Math. Ann. 285 (1989), 527?539. [Min-Oo(Hermiti...
1989 arXiv
-
[33]
Schick, A counterexample to the (unstable) Gromov-Lawson-Rosenberg conjecture, Topology 37 (1998), no
[Schick(counterexample)1998] T. Schick, A counterexample to the (unstable) Gromov-Lawson-Rosenberg conjecture, Topology 37 (1998), no. 6, 1165-1168. [Schick-Zadeh(multi-partitioned) 2015] T. Schick M. Zade h, Large scale in- dex of multi-partitioned manifolds , arXiv:1308.0742...
1998 arXiv
-
[57]
Penrose, Naked sin gularities, Ann
[Penrose(naked singularities) 1973] R. Penrose, Naked sin gularities, Ann. New York Acad.Sci.224(1973), 125-34. [Perelman(width) 1995] G. Perelman, Widths of non-negatively curved spaces Geometric And Functional Analysis, Vol. 5, No. 2 (1995) ? 199 5 [Petrunin(convex) 2003] A....
1973 arXiv
-
[71]
Lohkamp, Metrics of negative Ricci curvature, Annals of Mathematics, 140 (1994), 655-683
[Lohkamp(negative Ricci curvature) 1994] J. Lohkamp, Metrics of negative Ricci curvature, Annals of Mathematics, 140 (1994), 655-683. [Lohkamp(hammocks) 1999] J. Lohkamp, Scalar curvature and hammocks, Math. Ann. 313, 385-407,
1994
-
[230]
Hautes Etudes Sci
[GL(complete) 1983] M.Gromov, B Lawson, Positive scalar curvature and the Dirac operator on complete Riemannian manifolds, Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math.58 (1983), 83-196. [Goette(alternating torsion)2007] S. Goette, Scalar Curvature Estimates by Parallel Alternating Tor...
1983 arXiv
-
[803]
Dranishnikov, Asymptotic topology, Us- pekhi Mat
[Dranishnikov(asymptotic) 2000] A. Dranishnikov, Asymptotic topology, Us- pekhi Mat. Nauk, 2000, Volume 55 [Dranishnikov( hypereuclidean) 2006] On Hypereuclidean Manifolds Geome- triae Dedicata (2006) 117: 215-231 [Dranishnikov (large scale) 1999] A.Dranishnikov, On large scal...
2006 arXiv
-
[1973]
The classifi cation of simply connected manifolds of positive scalar curvature
https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb41445.x 360 [Geroch(relativity) 1975] R. Geroch General Relativity Proc. of Symp. in Pure Math., 27, Amer. Math. Soc., 1975, pp.401-414. [Ginoux(3d clasification) 2013] N.Ginoux. The classification of 3-...
1980
-
[1976]
Oxford OXI 3LB
[Atiyah(eigenvalues 1984] M Atiyah, Eigenvalues of the Dirac operator Math- ematical Institute. Oxford OXI 3LB. [Atiyah-Schmid(discrete series) 1977] M. Atiyah and W. Sch mid. A geomet- ric construction of the discrete series for semisimple Lie g roups. Invent. Math., 42:1, 62,
1984
-
[1977]
Basilio ,J
[BaDoSo(sewing Riemannian manifolds) 2018] J. Basilio ,J. Dodziuk, C. Sor- mani, Sewing Riemannian Manifolds with Positive Scalar Cur vature, The Jour- nal of Geometric AnalysisDecember 2018, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 3553-3602. [Baer-Hanke(local flexibility) 2020]¯C. Baer, B. Han...
1993 arXiv
-
[1981]
Zeidler, Band width estimates via the Dirac oper- ator, arXiv:1905.08520v2 ¯ [Zeidler(width) 2020] R
¯ 368 [Zeidler(bands) 2019] R. Zeidler, Band width estimates via the Dirac oper- ator, arXiv:1905.08520v2 ¯ [Zeidler(width) 2020] R. Zeidler, Width, largeness and index theory. arXiv:2008.13754 ¯ [Zhang(foliations) 2016] W. Zhang Positive scalar curvature on foliations. arXiv:...
2019 arXiv
-
[1982]
[Darmos(Gravitation einsteinienne) 1927] Georges Darmoi s Les équations de la Gravitation einsteinienne (Mémorial des Sciences mat hématiques dirigé par Henri Villat; fasc. XXV).Edité par Gauthier-Villars 19 27 [Davaux(spectrum) 2003] Hélène Davaux, An optimal inequality betwe...
2003
-
[1989]
LeBrun, Kodaira Dimension and the Yamabe Problem, Communications in Analysis and Geometry,Volume7, Number 1,133- 156 (1999)
https://zulfahmed.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/spingeometry.pdf [LeBrun(Yamabe) 1999] C. LeBrun, Kodaira Dimension and the Yamabe Problem, Communications in Analysis and Geometry,Volume7, Number 1,133- 156 (1999). [Lesourd-Unger-Yau(arbitrary ends) 2021] M. Lesourd, R.U nger, S...
1999 arXiv
-
[1991]
Katz Systolic Geometry and Topology, With an Appendix by Jake P
303 ‹ [Katz(systolic geometry) 2017] M. Katz Systolic Geometry and Topology, With an Appendix by Jake P. Solomon . Mathematical. Surveys and. Mono- graphs. Volume 137 American Mathematical Society, Provide nce, RI, [Kaz(4-manifolds) 2019] D. Kazaras, Desingularizing positive s...
1982 arXiv
-
[1995]
arXiv:1210.6100 [math.KT] ¯ [Rosenberg(C∗-algebras - positive scalar) 1984] J
[Roe (partial vanishing) 2012] John Roe, Positive curvature, partial vanish- ing theorems, and coarse indices. arXiv:1210.6100 [math.KT] ¯ [Rosenberg(C∗-algebras - positive scalar) 1984] J. Rosenberg, C∗-algebras, positive scalar curvature, and the Novikov conjecture. Inst. Ha...
2012 arXiv
-
[1996]
Gromov, Isoperimetry of waists and concentration of maps, GAF A, Geom
[G(waists) 2003] M. Gromov, Isoperimetry of waists and concentration of maps, GAF A, Geom. funct. anal.,13 (2003), 178-215. [G(singularities) 2009] Singularities, expanders and topology of maps. Part 1 : Homology versus volume in the spaces of cycles , GAF A, 19 (2009) n 3, 74...
2003 doi
-
[1997]
Savelyev, Gromov K-area and jumping curves in CPn, ¯arXiv:1006.4383 [math.SG]
[Salamon(lectures) 1999] Dietmar Salamon, Spin geometry and Seiberg-Witten invariants https://people.math.ethz.ch/~salamon/PREPRINTS/witsei.pdf [Savelyev(jumping) 2012] Ya. Savelyev, Gromov K-area and jumping curves in CPn, ¯arXiv:1006.4383 [math.SG]
1999 arXiv
-
[1999]
Lohkamp, Minimal Smoothings of Area Min- imizing Cones , https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03157 [Lott(boundary) 2020] J
[Lohkamp(smoothing) 2018] J. Lohkamp, Minimal Smoothings of Area Min- imizing Cones , https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03157 [Lott(boundary) 2020] J. Lott, Index theory for scalar curvature on manifolds with boundary , arXiv:2009.07256 ¯ [Lafont-Schimidt(simplicial volume) 2017] J.-...
1988 arXiv
-
[2002]
Gromov M
[GSh(Riemann-Roch) 1993] M. Gromov M. Shubin, The Riemann-Roch the- orem for elliptic s , I. M. Gelfand Seminar, Adv. Soviet Math., vol. 16, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993, pp. 211-241. MR 1237831 [Guijarro-Wilhelm(focal radius) 2017] L. Guijarro, F. Wil helm, Focal Ra...
2011 arXiv
-
[2010]
Llarull Sharp estimates and the Dirac operator, Mathematische Annalen January 1998, Volume 310, Issue 1, pp 55-
[Llarull(sharp estimates) 1998] M. Llarull Sharp estimates and the Dirac operator, Mathematische Annalen January 1998, Volume 310, Issue 1, pp 55-
1998
-
[2011]
Bengtsso, Some Examples of Trapped Surfaces arXiv:1112.5318 [Bern-Heit(enlargeability-foliations) 2018] M.-T
[Be-Be-Ma-Ma(deforming 3-manifolds) 2017] Laurent Bessières (IMB), Gérard 355 Besson (IF), Sylvain Maillot (IMAG), Fernando Coda Marques ,Deforming 3- manifolds of bounded geometry and uniformly positive scala r curvature, arXiv:1711.02457 [math.DG] ¯ [Bengtsson(trapped surfac...
2011 arXiv
-
[2012]
Entov, K-area, Hofer metric and geometry of conjugacy classes in Lie groups , Invent.Math., 146 (2001), pp
[arXiv:0911.0377] [Entov(Hofer metric) 2001] M. Entov, K-area, Hofer metric and geometry of conjugacy classes in Lie groups , Invent.Math., 146 (2001), pp. 93-141. ¯ [Federer(singular) 1970] H. Federer, The singular sets of area minimizing rectifiable currents with codimension ...
2001 arXiv
Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.