Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A simple and practical algorithm for differentially private data release

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1012.4763 v2 pith:6F46FRKC submitted 2010-12-21 cs.DS

classification cs.DS
keywords dataqueriesapproachdistributionreleasesimplealgorithmcounting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present new theoretical results on differentially private data release useful with respect to any target class of counting queries, coupled with experimental results on a variety of real world data sets. Specifically, we study a simple combination of the multiplicative weights approach of [Hardt and Rothblum, 2010] with the exponential mechanism of [McSherry and Talwar, 2007]. The multiplicative weights framework allows us to maintain and improve a distribution approximating a given data set with respect to a set of counting queries. We use the exponential mechanism to select those queries most incorrectly tracked by the current distribution. Combing the two, we quickly approach a distribution that agrees with the data set on the given set of queries up to small error. The resulting algorithm and its analysis is simple, but nevertheless improves upon previous work in terms of both error and running time. We also empirically demonstrate the practicality of our approach on several data sets commonly used in the statistical community for contingency table release.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Data Experts Buying into Differentially Private Synthetic Data? Gathering Community Perspectives

    cs.HC 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Interviews with 17 data experts show skepticism toward differentially private synthetic data, a last-resort stance, and a demand for validation against real data.

Pith tools