Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 92 references

Charting the Moral Universe: Capturing Virtues and Values of Data Visualization Practice

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ethical data visualization is not just avoiding lies; it is a practiced craft of 68 values in nine clusters, and this paper maps them from 20 expert interviews.

desk verdict A careful, honest qualitative study that delivers a genuinely useful vocabulary for visualization ethics; the only real wobble is the conclusion's 'in practice' phrasing, and that is a word-choice issue, not a load-bearing flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21732 v1 pith:6KSZQI3L submitted 2026-07-23 cs.HC

Chloe Hudson Prock , Enrico Bertini , Michael Correll This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords datavisualizationethicsvirtuevaluesexpertinterviewsqualitativecodingphronesisethicaltensionspractice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to capture what experienced data visualization practitioners actually value and worry about, rather than relying only on rulebooks that say what to avoid. Through 20 semi-structured interviews with researchers, journalists, designers, and data artists, the authors identify 68 values and group them into nine 'virtue clusters'—from professional wisdom and honesty to fairness, care, and aesthetic appeal. They argue that ethical visualization is less about obeying a list of prohibitions and more about building practical judgment, a moral skill acquired through experience. If correct, the field gains a shared vocabulary for ethical reflection and a clearer picture of the tensions—such as persuasion versus neutrality, or engagement versus efficiency—that practitioners navigate daily. This matters because ethical guidance that only says 'don't deceive' leaves designers without language for the harder, more common choices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the interview-derived taxonomy: 68 values affinity-diagrammed into nine virtue clusters, with each value tagged as applying to the visualization object, the designer, or both. The authors define a 'virtue' as an ethical matter of concern and a 'value' as any concern a person considers important; the distinction lets them avoid judging which concerns are genuinely virtuous. The taxonomy is what carries the argument that ethical work spans character, craft, and care.

What would settle it

An observational study that follows visualization designers through real projects—recording decisions under deadline, client, and budget pressure—and then compares those decisions against the 68 listed values. If designers' choices repeatedly contradict their stated values (for example, accepting y-axis truncation when a client demands it), then the taxonomy describes espoused ideals rather than enacted ethics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is descriptive and generative: the ethical concerns of data visualization practitioners are far richer than the usual injunction to avoid misleading charts. Based on interviews with 20 experts, the paper reports 68 values, sorted into nine virtue clusters that apply either to visualizations themselves, to their designers, or to both. It also surfaces four recurring tensions—subjectivity versus objectivity, data versus truth, persuasion versus neutrality, and engagement versus efficiency—that practitioners negotiate without fixed answers. The paper concludes that ethical visualization is a matter of practical wisdom built through experience, not a matter of learning rules.

Load-bearing premise

The taxonomy rests on the assumption that what experienced practitioners say they value in retrospect accurately reflects the values that actually shape their visualization decisions in practice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ethics education in visualization can move from checklists to case-based discussion of virtues and tensions.
  • Researchers and evaluators gain a broader set of criteria for judging 'good' visualization beyond effectiveness and honesty.
  • The four tensions give instructors concrete material for teaching ethical judgment.
  • The taxonomy opens the door to empirical studies of whether espoused values are actually enacted in practice.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interview approach could be replicated in adjacent fields such as data journalism or AI interface design to test whether the nine clusters generalize across technical practices.
  • The nine clusters could be converted into a card deck or reflective tool for design teams, similar to existing ethics card methods, to make the values actionable during design.
  • The four tensions suggest a testable hypothesis: design decisions made under deadline or client pressure will systematically sacrifice the 'care' values, such as situatedness and empathy.
  • The near-universal mention of situatedness and mindfulness of bias suggests a generational shift in the field's self-conception, but whether this shift is real or only linguistic needs observational validation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a qualitative interview study with 20 experienced data visualization researchers, practitioners, journalists, designers, and educators. Through semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, the authors derive 68 values organized into nine 'virtue clusters,' and identify four recurring tensions (subjectivity vs. objectivity, data vs. truth, persuasion vs. neutrality, engagement vs. efficiency). The stated contribution is a generative descriptive vocabulary for ethical reflection in data visualization, intended to broaden the field's focus beyond avoiding deception. The paper includes an explicit limitations section acknowledging the subjectivity of the analysis, the Western-centric sample, and the gap between espoused and enacted values.

Significance. If accepted as a descriptive framework, this paper would provide a valuable resource for visualization ethics pedagogy and practice. Its strengths include a transparent interview protocol, a coding procedure with an initial dual-coded calibration phase, extensive use of participant quotes, and a supplemental table of value definitions. The paper is careful to frame the taxonomy as non-exhaustive and generative rather than prescriptive. The identification of recurring tensions experienced by practitioners is a useful contribution that goes beyond simple lists of dos and don'ts. The explicit acknowledgment of the authors' own positionality and the self-report limitation adds credibility. However, the central claim as stated in the conclusion slightly overreaches the evidence, and some quantitative presentations of qualitative coding results are not fully supported by the stated methodology.

minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.3 (Conclusion) and Abstract] The conclusion states that the framework 'reflects matters of concern that visualization experts consider in practice.' This phrasing is stronger than the evidence supports, since the data come from retrospective interviews rather than observations of practice. The authors themselves acknowledge in §5.2 that 'what people (even experts) say they value is one thing: it remains to be seen to what extent these values are embodied or prioritized in practice.' Please revise the abstract and conclusion to say 'report considering in their professional work' or 'espouse' rather than 'consider in practice,' to stay consistent with the stated limitation.
  2. [§3.3 and Fig. 3] The coding procedure used dual-coded calibration for six transcripts and single coding for the remaining 14, and the authors state the codes are 'not strictly amenable to quantitative measures such as inter-rater reliability.' Yet Fig. 3 reports per-value transcript counts, and §5 highlights 'Nearly all (N=19) interviewees' for two values. Without any reliability check, these counts are difficult to interpret. I suggest either explicitly labeling the counts as illustrative of the diversity of responses rather than robust prevalence estimates, or softening the 'nearly all' claim.
  3. [Throughout] Minor typographical and style issues: the abstract contains 'V Y et' instead of 'Yet'; §1 has 'intension' where 'in tension' is meant; §5 has 'pedogogical' instead of 'pedagogical'; §5.1.4 has 'unambigious' instead of 'unambiguous.' Please proofread carefully.
  4. [§3.1] The participant table and Figure 2 report professional areas and engagement frequency, but the paper does not report the distribution of participants across the three continents mentioned in the text. A sentence or small table clarifying the geographic spread would help readers assess the diversity claim, especially given the acknowledged Western-centric limitation in §5.2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the taxonomy is an inductive result from external interview data.

full rationale

The paper's central result—68 values organized into nine virtue clusters—is generated through semi-structured interviews with 20 external participants and qualitative thematic coding of transcripts, not derived from the authors' prior equations, fitted parameters, or imposed definitions. The coding scheme (clear values, pointing towards a value, value conflict) is a generic tagging method; it does not by construction determine the specific 68 values, which are reported as emerging from interview excerpts and interpretive discussion. The authors build on prior critical visualization work including a self-citation (Correll [13]) for the virtue-ethics lens, but this framing is not load-bearing for the empirical claim: the values are sourced from interview data, and the paper explicitly disclaims exhaustiveness and acknowledges the authors' positionality (§5.2). The acknowledged limitation that retrospective self-reports may not match enacted practice—'what people (even experts) say they value is one thing: it remains to be seen to what extent these values are embodied or prioritized in practice'—concerns external validity, not circularity, since the claim is explicitly about surfacing matters of concern from interviews. Likewise, the 14/20 single-coded transcripts affect coding reliability, not the derivation chain. No equation, fitted parameter, or uniqueness theorem is invoked, and no prediction is claimed that reduces by construction to the inputs, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the choice of interviewees and on the interpretive coding, which are domain assumptions rather than numeric free parameters. No physical or formal entities are introduced; the nine virtue clusters are the paper's output, not pre-supposed entities. The coding scheme and participant-selection criteria are the main unverified inputs.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Exemplars of good visualization can be identified by the authors' qualitative judgment prior to having explicit criteria for goodness (Zagzebski's method)
    §3.1: 'we do not have criteria for goodness in advance of identifying the exemplars'; participant selection is therefore subjective and shapes the resulting taxonomy.
  • domain assumption Retrospective self-reports of values in interviews correspond to the ethical considerations that actually shape practice
    §5.2: 'what people (even experts) say they value is one thing: it remains to be seen to what extent these values are embodied or prioritized in practice.' If espoused and enacted values diverge, the framework describes stated ideals rather than practice.
  • domain assumption A priori coding categories and the authors' interpretative lens do not unduly constrain the values identified
    §3.3: codes were defined collaboratively before coding; the paper acknowledges positionality (§5.2), so the taxonomy may selectively surface values aligned with the authors' critical-visualization perspective.
  • domain assumption Affinity diagramming with three-author consensus produces a meaningful cluster structure
    §3.3.1: 'through a series of discussions, we iterated over value placement until all three authors agreed on the placement'; cluster boundaries are subjective and not externally validated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charting the Moral Universe: Capturing Virtues and Values of Data Visualization Practice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6KSZQI3L

@misc{pith2026260721732,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charting the Moral Universe: Capturing Virtues and Values of Data Visualization Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6KSZQI3L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21732}
}
read the original abstract

What do we value in our visualizations, and in the people who design them? Despite a growing body of work on critical data visualization, the conception of what it is to do ethical data visualization work can often be narrow (for instance, holding that our ethical duties are discharged merely by avoiding overtly lying or manipulating data), or entangled with potentially problematic implicit value structures (such as the assumption of the objectivity and neutrality of data, and so the designer's role being merely the passive conveying of numbers as efficiently as possible). Yet, what it means to act ethically in data visualization is broad and multifaceted, and the virtues to which we should aspire as data visualization researchers and designers are worth explicating. We conducted an interview study with a broad spectrum of 20 experienced data visualization researchers, practitioners, and data artists to solicit their values and ethical considerations around doing visualization work. We report on a list of 68 values, organized into nine virtue clusters, that we encountered in our interviews. These virtues and values together describe a diverse space of matters of care and concern in data visualization: from the unease around the best use of visualization as a tool for persuasion, to the tightrope that visualization practitioners often walk between their professional responsibilities and their personal moral commitments. The virtues themselves, as well as our interviewees' reflections on ethical practice, offer practitioners, researchers, and educators in data visualization a richer vocabulary for ethical reflection and provide a broader foundation for considering and applying visualization ethics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21732 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Symbolic representations of our nine virtue clusters: semantically related groupings of 68 virtues and values, which are aspects of a what make a “good” visualization, or a good visualization designer. Abstract—What do we value in our visualizations, and in the people who design them? Despite a growing body of work on critical data visualization, the conception of what it is to do ethical data visualization work can… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Demographic information shared by our interview participants. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A table indicating values arranged within semantically similar virtue clusters. We also indicate how many interview transcripts (out of 20) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akbaba, L

    D. Akbaba, L. Klein, and M. Meyer. Entanglements for Visualization: Changing Research Outcomes through Feminist Theory.IEEE Transac- tions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, pp. 1–11, 2024. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. doi: 10.1109/ TVCG.2024.3456171 2

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Akbaba, D

    D. Akbaba, D. Lange, M. Correll, A. Lex, and M. Meyer. Troubling col- laboration: Matters of care for visualization design study. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23, article no. 812, 15 pages. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3544548.3581168 7

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    J. Annas. Being virtuous and doing the right thing.Proceedings and addresses of the American philosophical association, 78(2):61–75, 2004. doi: 10.2307/3219725 3

    work page doi:10.2307/3219725 2004

  4. [4]

    Aristotle.Nicomachean Ethics, vol. VI. Cambridge University Press,

  5. [5]

    Berret and T

    C. Berret and T. Munzner. Iceberg sensemaking: a process model for critical data analysis.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(9):6067–6084, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.04758 2

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.04758 2024

  6. [6]

    J. Boy, A. V . Pandey, J. Emerson, M. Satterthwaite, O. Nov, and E. Bertini. Showing people behind data: Does anthropomorphizing visualizations elicit more empathy for human rights data? InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’17, 13 pages, p. 5462–5474. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA, ...

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    A. Cairo. Graphics lies, misleading visuals: Reflections on the challenges and pitfalls of evidence-driven visual communication. InNew challenges for data design, pp. 103–116. Springer, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471 -6596-5_5 1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4471 2014

  8. [8]

    Campbell and D

    S. Campbell and D. Offenhuber. Feeling numbers: The emotional impact of proximity techniques in visualization.Information Design Journal, 25(1):71–86, Dec. 2019. doi: 10.1075/idj.25.1.06cam 8

    doi:10.1075/idj.25.1.06cam 2019

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    Carlsson

    A.-L. Carlsson. The Aesthetic and the Poietic Elements of Information Design. In2010 14th International Conference Information Visualisation, pp. 450–454, July 2010. ISSN: 2375-0138. doi: 10.1109/IV.2010.69 8

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Cawthon and A

    N. Cawthon and A. V . Moere. The Effect of Aesthetic on the Usability of Data Visualization. In2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV ’07), pp. 637–648, July 2007. ISSN: 1550-6037. doi: 10. 1109/IV.2007.147 8

    2007

  3. [11]

    Chappell

    S.-G. Chappell. Lists of the virtues.Ethics & Politics/Etica e Politica, 17(2), 2015. 3

    2015

  4. [12]

    Conwill, M

    L. Conwill, M. K. Levis, K. Badillo-Urquiola, and W. J. Scheirer. Design patterns for the common good: Building better technologies using the wisdom of virtue ethics. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–23, 2025. doi: 10.48550/...

    2025 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    M. Correll. Ethical Dimensions of Visualization Research. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, May 2019. doi: 10.1145/3290605. 3300418 2, 8

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Correll.Teru Teru B ¯ozu: Defensive Raincloud Plots.Computer Graphics Forum, 42(3):235–246, June 2023

    M. Correll.Teru Teru B ¯ozu: Defensive Raincloud Plots.Computer Graphics Forum, 42(3):235–246, June 2023. doi: 10.1111/cgf.14826 6

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Correll and J

    M. Correll and J. Heer. Black hat visualization.Workshop on Dealing with Cognitive Biases in Visualisations (DECISIVe), IEEE VIS, 1(3):10,

  8. [16]

    Creamer, L

    M. Creamer, L. Padilla, and M. Borkin. Finding Gaps in Modern Visual- ization Literacy, Apr. 2024. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/jy9v2 7

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    T. DeMarco. Forward. In C. Myers, T. Hall, and D. Pitt, eds.,The responsible software engineer: selected readings in IT professionalism. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0923 -5 1

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    D’Ignazio and L

    C. D’Ignazio and L. Klein.Data Feminism, chap. 6: The Numbers Don’t Speak for Themselves. MIT Press, 2020. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/11805. 001.0001 1, 2, 8

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    D’Ignazio and L

    C. D’Ignazio and L. Klein.Data Feminism, chap. 1: Introduction: Why Data Science Needs Feminism. MIT Press, 2020. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/ 11805.001.0001 7

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    J. Drucker. Humanities approaches to graphical display.Digital Humani- ties Quarterly, 5(1):1–21, 2011. doi: 10.63744/r4ysrh7ae534 2

    2011 doi

  13. [21]

    Duffy, J

    J. Duffy, J. Gallagher, S. Holmes, J. T. Gage, L. Agnew, J. Schilb, J. S. Colton, C. Alford, L. E. Cagle, and S. Barnett. Virtue Ethics.Rhetoric Review, 37(4):321–392, 2018. doi: 10.1080/07350198.2018.1497882 4

    2018

  14. [22]

    M. Dörk, C. Collins, P. Feng, and S. Carpendale. Critical InfoVis: Ex- ploring the Politics of Visualization.CHI, 2013. doi: 10.1145/2468356. 246873 2

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    Field and I

    K. Field and I. Muehlenhaus. On the ethics of cartographic ethics.The Cartographic Journal, pp. 1–18, 2024. doi: 10.1080/00087041.2025. 2479647 3

    2024

  16. [24]

    Floridi and M

    L. Floridi and M. Taddeo. What is data ethics?Philosophical trans- actions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 374(2083):20160360, Dec. 2016. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0360 2

  17. [25]

    Foidl, M

    H. Foidl, M. Felderer, and R. Ramler. Data smells: categories, causes and consequences, and detection of suspicious data in ai-based systems. InProceedings of the 1st International Conference on AI Engineering: Software Engineering for AI, CAIN ’22, 11 pages, p. 229–239. Assoc...

    2022

  18. [26]

    Friedman

    B. Friedman. Value-sensitive design.Interactions, 3(6):16–23, Dec. 1996. 2

    1996

  19. [27]

    Friedman, P

    B. Friedman, P. H. Kahn, A. Borning, and A. Huldtgren. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, and M. E. Gorman, eds.,Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory, pp. 55–95. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht,

  20. [28]

    Gelman and A

    A. Gelman and A. Unwin. Infovis and statistical graphics: Different goals, different looks.Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 22(1):2–28, 2013. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2012.761137 9

    2013

  21. [29]

    Raw Data

    L. Gitelman."Raw Data" Is an Oxymoron. The MIT Press, 01 2013. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001 8

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    Gotterbarn and D

    D. Gotterbarn and D. Kreps. Being a data professional: give voice to value in a data driven society.AI and Ethics, 1(2):195–203, 2021. doi: 10. 1007/s43681-020-00027-y 1

    2021

  23. [31]

    D. Haraway. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.Feminist Studies, 14(3):575–599,

  24. [32]

    S. Hill, B. Wray, C. Sibona, and N. Wilmington. Minimalism in data visualization: Perceptions of beauty, clarity, effectiveness, and simplicity. Journal of Information Systems Applied Research, 11(1):34, 2018. 9

    2018

  25. [33]

    H. Houser. The aesthetics of environmental visualizations: More than information ecstasy?Public culture, 26(2):319–337, 2014. doi: 10.1215/ 08992363-2392084 2

    2014

  26. [34]

    J. Hullman. Why Authors Don’t Visualize Uncertainty.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(1):130–139, Jan. 2020. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934287 9

    2020

  27. [35]

    Hursthouse and G

    R. Hursthouse and G. Pettigrove. Virtue Ethics. In E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, eds.,The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Meta- physics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2023 ed., 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  28. [36]

    Inbar, N

    O. Inbar, N. Tractinsky, and J. Meyer. Minimalism in information visual- ization: attitudes towards maximizing the data-ink ratio. InProceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Invent! Explore!, ECCE ’07, 4 pages, p. 185–188. Association for Computing ...

    2007

  29. [37]

    S. C. S. Joyner, A. Riegelhuth, K. Garrity, Y .-S. Kim, and N. W. Kim. Visualization Accessibility in the Wild: Challenges Faced by Visualization Designers. InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–19. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, Apr. 2022. doi: 10.1145/34911...

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    Kennedy and R

    H. Kennedy and R. L. Hill. The Feeling of Numbers: Emotions in Everyday Engagements with Data and Their Visualisation.Sociology, 52(4):830–848, Aug. 2018. Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10. 1177/0038038516674675 8

    2018

  31. [39]

    Kennedy, R

    H. Kennedy, R. L. Hill, G. Aiello, and W. Allen. The work that visualisa- tion conventions do.Information, Communication & Society, 19(6):715– 735, June 2016. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153126 9

    2016

  32. [40]

    Kennedy, R

    H. Kennedy, R. L. Hill, W. Allen, and A. Kirk. Engaging with (big) data visualizations: Factors that affect engagement and resulting new definitions of effectiveness.First Monday, 21(11), 2016. Number: 11 Publisher: University of Illinois at Chicago Library. doi: 10.5210/fm. v...

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    A. A. Khan, S. Badshah, P. Liang, M. Waseem, B. Khan, A. Ahmad, M. Fahmideh, M. Niazi, and M. A. Akbar. Ethics of AI: A Systematic Literature Review of Principles and Challenges. InProceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engine...

    2022

  34. [42]

    Kostelnick

    C. Kostelnick. The Visual Rhetoric of Data Displays: The Conundrum of Clarity*.IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51(1):116– 130, Mar. 2008. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2007.914869 1, 2, 6

    2008

  35. [43]

    Kostelnick

    C. Kostelnick. The art of visual design: The rhetoric of aesthetics in technical communication.Technical Communication, 67(4):6–27, 2020. 8

    2020

  36. [44]

    X. Lan, Y . Wang, L. Peng, and X. Ma. More Than Beautiful: Exploring Design Features, Practical Perspectives, and Implications of Artistic Data Visualization, Feb. 2025. arXiv:2502.04940 [cs]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv. 2502.04940 8

    2025 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    X. Lan, Y . Wu, and N. Cao. Affective Visualization Design: Leveraging the Emotional Impact of Data.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1):1–11, Jan. 2024. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. doi: 10.1109/ TVCG.20...

    2024

  38. [46]

    C. Lee. The mirror ethic: reflection, relation, and responsibility.AI and Ethics, 6(3):293, May 2026. doi: 10.1007/s43681-026-01160-w 8

    2026 doi

  39. [47]

    Lee-Robbins and E

    E. Lee-Robbins and E. Adar. Affective Learning Objectives for Com- municative Visualizations, Aug. 2022. arXiv:2208.04078 [cs]. doi: 10. 48550/arXiv.2208.04078 8

    2022 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    Lisnic, C

    M. Lisnic, C. Polychronis, A. Lex, and M. Kogan. Misleading Beyond Visual Tricks: How People Actually Lie with Charts. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23, pp. 1–21. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA, Ap...

    2023

  41. [49]

    L. Y .-H. Lo, A. Gupta, K. Shigyo, A. Wu, E. Bertini, and H. Qu. Mis- informed by visualization: What do we learn from misinformative visu- alizations?Computer Graphics Forum, 41(3):515–525, 2022. doi: 10. 48550/arXiv.2204.09548 1

    2022 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    G. Lupi. Data humanism: the revolutionary future of data visualization. Print Magazine, 30(3), 2017. 2

    2017

  43. [51]

    Mackinlay

    J. Mackinlay. Automating the design of graphical presentations of rela- tional information.ACM Trans. Graph., 5(2):110–141, 32 pages, Apr

  44. [52]

    Marx.Theses on feuerbach, vol

    K. Marx.Theses on feuerbach, vol. 16. Marchen, 2024. 9

    2024

  45. [53]

    McNutt, S

    A. McNutt, S. He, S. K. Kamaraj, P. Bambroo, N. Jadidi, J. Bovard, and C. Han. Teaching critical visualization: A field report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02592, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.02592 2

    2025 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    McNutt, G

    A. McNutt, G. Kindlmann, and M. Correll. Surfacing Visualization Mi- rages. InProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–16. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, Apr. 2020. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376420 9

    2020

  47. [55]

    A. M. McNutt, L. Huang, and K. Koenig. Visualization for Villainy, Sept

  48. [56]

    Ideal Theory

    C. W. Mills. "Ideal Theory" as Ideology.Hypatia, 20(3):165–184, 2005. 6

    2005

  49. [57]

    Morais, Y

    L. Morais, Y . Jansen, N. Andrade, and P. Dragicevic. Showing Data About People: A Design Space of Anthropographics.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(3):1661–1679, Mar. 2022. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023013 8

    2022

  50. [58]

    Munteanu, H

    C. Munteanu, H. Molyneaux, W. Moncur, M. Romero, S. O’Donnell, and J. Vines. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 105–...

    2015

  51. [59]

    Newstead, S

    T. Newstead, S. Dawkins, R. Macklin, and A. Martin. Evaluating the virtues project as a leadership development programme.Leadership, 16(6):633–660, 2020. doi: 10.1177/174271501989984 3, 8

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    Newstead, S

    T. Newstead, S. Dawkins, R. Macklin, and A. Martin. The virtues project: An approach to developing good leaders.Journal of Business Ethics, 167:605–622, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04163-2 3

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    J. Noel. On the varieties of phronesis.Educational philosophy and theory, 31(3):273–289, 1999. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.1999.tb00466.x 1

    1999

  54. [62]

    Nunes Vilaza, K

    G. Nunes Vilaza, K. Doherty, D. McCashin, D. Coyle, J. Bardram, and M. Barry. A Scoping Review of Ethics Across SIGCHI. InDesigning In- teractive Systems Conference, pp. 137–154. ACM, Virtual Event Australia, June 2022. doi: 10.1145/3532106.3533511 2

    2022

  55. [63]

    Ozkaramanli.Me against myself: Addressing personal dilemmas through design

    D. Ozkaramanli.Me against myself: Addressing personal dilemmas through design. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2017. 2

    2017

  56. [64]

    Panagiotidou, A

    G. Panagiotidou, A. McNutt, D. Akbaba, N. Hengesbach, and M. Meyer. Critical data visualization—part i.IEEE Computer Graphics and Applica- tions, 45(3):14–16, 2025. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2025.3579638 2

    2025

  57. [65]

    Parsons and P

    P. Parsons and P. Shukla. Data visualization practitioners’ perspectives on chartjunk. In2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS), pp. 211–215,

  58. [66]

    unintended consequences

    N. Parvin and A. Pollock. Unintended by design: on the political uses of “unintended consequences”.Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6:320–327, 2020. doi: 10.17351/ests2020.497 1

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    Peterson and M

    C. Peterson and M. E. P. Seligman.Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 2004. Pages: xiv, 800. 4, 7

    2004

  60. [68]

    Pirolli, S

    P. Pirolli, S. K. Card, and M. M. Van Der Wege. The effect of information scent on searching information.Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pp. 161–172, May 2000. doi: 10.1145/345513 .345304 6

    doi

  61. [69]

    Prantl, T

    V . Prantl, T. Möller, and L. Koesten. Untangling rhetoric, pathos, and aesthetics in data visualization.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 32(2):2435–2453, 2026. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2025. 3628181 7, 8

    2026 doi

  62. [70]

    Puerta, S

    E. Puerta, S. C. Spivak, and M. Correll. The many tendrils of the octopus map. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’25, article no. 970, 20 pages. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA, 2025. doi: 10.1145/370659...

    2025 doi

  63. [71]

    S. Ryan. Wisdom. In E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, eds.,The Stanford En- cyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, fall 2023 ed., 2023. 4

    2023

  64. [72]

    Saharan, I

    S. Saharan, I. Al-Hazwani, M. Meyer, and L. Garrison. A critical reflec- tion on the values and assumptions in data visualization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.22051, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.22051 2, 9

    2026 doi

  65. [73]

    Schwabish and A

    J. Schwabish and A. Feng. Do No Harm Guide: Applying Equity Aware- ness in Data Visualization. 1, 7

  66. [74]

    Sultanum, D

    N. Sultanum, D. Bromley, and M. Correll. Data guards: Challenges and solutions for fostering trust in data. In2024 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS), pp. 56–60, 2024. doi: 10.1109/VIS55277.2024.00019 9

    2024

  67. [75]

    C. Swanton. A Virtue Ethical Account of Right Action.Ethics, 112(1):32– 52, Oct. 2001. doi: 10.1086/322742 8

    2001 doi

  68. [76]

    Olszewska

    Systems and Software Engineering Standards Committee and J. Olszewska. IEEE Standard Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns During System Design: IEEE Standard 7000-2021. IEEE, United States, Sept

    2021

  69. [77]

    E. R. Tufte and P. R. Graves-Morris.The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics press Cheshire, CT, 1983. 6

    1983

  70. [78]

    Data and AI Ethics Framework

    UK Government Government Digital Service. Data and AI Ethics Framework. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ data-ethics-framework/data-and-ai-ethics-framework , Dec

  71. [79]

    J. J. Van Wijk. The value of visualization. InVIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005., pp. 79–86. IEEE, 2005. doi: 10.1109/VISUAL.2005.1532781 2

    2005

  72. [80]

    Z. Wang, S. Hao, and S. Carpendale. Card-based approach to engage exploring ethics in ai for data visualization. InExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’24, article no. 69, 7 pages. Association for Computing Machinery, New York...

    2024

  73. [81]

    L. T. Zagzebski.Divine motivation theory. Cambridge University Press,

  74. [82]

    Z. Zeng, J. Yang, D. Moritz, J. Heer, and L. Battle. Too many cooks: Exploring how graphical perception studies influence visualization recom- mendations in draco.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1):1063–1073, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.14241 2

    2023 doi arXiv

  75. [83]

    doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2021.9536679 3

    2021

  76. [84]

    K. E. A. Zhang, J. Jenkinson, and L. Garrison. Deconstructing Implicit Beliefs in Visual Data Journalism: Unstable Meanings Behind Data as Truth & Design for Insight, July 2025. arXiv:2507.12377 [cs]. doi: 10. 48550/arXiv.2507.12377 9

    2025 doi arXiv

  77. [91]

    Zer-Aviv

    M. Zer-Aviv. Dataviz–the unempathetic art.Responsible Data, 2015. 8

    2015

  78. [1986]

    doi: 10.1145/22949.22950 6

  79. [1988]

    doi: 10.2307/3178066 9

    doi

  80. [2000]

    doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511802058.010 4

    doi

  81. [2004]

    doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511606823 3

    doi

  82. [2013]

    doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4 2

    doi

  83. [2020]

    doi: 10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00049 9

    2020

  84. [2021]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2109.06007 1

    arXiv:2109.06007 [cs]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2109.06007 1

    doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.