Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 106 references

CIR bridge for modeling of fish migration on sub-hourly scale

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that a Cox–Ingersoll–Ross bridge pinned to zero at sunrise and sunset is well-posed with closed-form mean and variance, and that the fitted high-volatility bridge reproduces the intermittent 10-minute migration counts of…

desk verdict A genuinely new tractable CIR bridge with closed-form moments, attached to an empirical application that is suggestive but not yet properly validated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07094 v3 pith:6NBZSTKJ submitted 2025-06-08 math.PR cs.NAmath.NA

Hidekazu Yoshioka This is my paper
classification math.PRcs.NAmath.NA MSC 60H1060J6092D25
keywords CIRbridgeCox-Ingersoll-Rossprocessdiffusionsub-hourlyfishmigrationayuPlecoglossusaltivelison-offintermittencyburststatisticsclosed-formmoments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a stochastic bridge built from the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross process and argues that it is a well-posed model for sub-hourly fish migration counts. In the model, the number of fish passing a river observation point between sunrise and sunset is a nonnegative diffusion that starts and ends at zero, with drift and volatility functions that become unbounded near sunset. The paper proves existence, uniqueness, and continuity of the solution for a broad class of such functions, and derives closed-form time-dependent averages and variances that make parameter fitting direct. Fitted to 10-minute counts of juvenile ayu in the Nagara River, the bridge falls in the high-volatility regime, so its sample paths show intermittent bursts similar to the observed on–off pattern of counts.

What carries the argument

The central object is the CIR bridge, the solution of SDE (2): a time-inhomogeneous, localized Cox–Ingersoll–Ross process with a square-root diffusion coefficient $\sigma\sqrt{h(t)X_t}$ and an unbounded drift and diffusion as $t$ approaches the terminal time. Its tractability comes from being an affine process under a time change: with $H'=h$, the bridge is a time-changed CIR process with a time-dependent source, which yields the closed-form average (8), variance (9), and conditional moment-generating function (11)–(13). The function $h$ controls how the biological clock accelerates near sunset, and condition (4) ensures the terminal value is zero; a recently developed one-step numerical method preserves nonnegativity even when the net volatility is unbounded.

What would settle it

Re-estimate the fitted models on days with very large total counts and compare the observed variance of the normalized 10-minute counts to the theoretical variance (9). If the observed variance consistently exceeds the theoretical one by more than Monte Carlo error, the square-root diffusion coefficient understates the burstiness and the central fit claim would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the SDE $dX_t=(a(t)-h(t)X_t)\,dt+\sigma\sqrt{h(t)X_t}\,dB_t$ with $X_0=0$ and a suitable unbounded $h$ near $T$ is a well-posed CIR bridge: it has a unique pathwise continuous, almost surely nonnegative solution with terminal limit $0$ regardless of the volatility size, and its mean (8) and variance (9) are available in closed form. Applied to each day's 10-minute fish counts after normalization by that day's total, the fitted bridge with $h(s)=1/s+1/(1-s)+\varepsilon$ tracks the empirical average, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation, and the fitted parameters satisfy the high-volatility condition. The paper therefore claims that sub-hourly upstream migration of $P$. altivelis at the study site is an intermittent, high-volatility phenomenon, with sample paths exhibiting several burst events per day whose statistics match the sparse and dense burst patterns seen in the data.

Load-bearing premise

The 10-minute fish counts are treated as exact, error-free readings of a continuous diffusion state variable, and the process is forced to hit exactly zero at sunrise and sunset; if the discrete count scale or the day-to-day normalization distorts this mapping, the fitted parameters and burst statistics would not carry over to the real counts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The closed-form average and variance let the model parameters be identified by least squares, without simulation-based likelihoods or extra approximation errors.
  • Because the bridge is well-posed in all volatility regimes, it can be used as a building block for any nonnegative quantity that vanishes outside a fixed time interval, such as intermittent river discharge.
  • The fitted high-volatility bridge predicts that 0 to 2 burst events are typical per day, with 6 to 9 possible in extreme cases and average burst duration near one hour, so manual counting protocols that ignore this intermittency could be badly biased.
  • The seasonal dependence of migration can be tracked through the fitted parameters of daily bridges, and the analysis points to water temperature as the environmental indicator worth measuring along the river.
  • The numerical scheme reproduces the theoretical mean and variance accurately when sample size and time step are balanced, so the model is directly computable rather than only an abstract object.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that treating the observed counts as noisy observations of the latent bridge, for example through a Poisson or overdispersed count link, would be a natural next test; if counts are more overdispersed than the diffusion variance allows, the fitted burst statistics would change.
  • The normalization by each day's total count removes the dominant day-to-day scale but assumes the daily total is known exactly; a hierarchical extension with random daily totals would propagate counting uncertainty into the bridge parameters.
  • Because the terminal time is fixed and the endpoint is exactly zero, days with migration after sunset, before sunrise, or with missing observation windows would need a relaxed or randomized endpoint; the paper itself names the fixed terminal time as a limitation.
  • The burst analysis counts events relative to a fixed threshold height and duration; defining bursts relative to the local mean or to the day's scale would be a straightforward robustness check that could sharpen or overturn the intermittency picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper introduces a 'CIR bridge' as a pathwise continuous nonnegative solution to the time-inhomogeneous SDE (2), with zero initial and terminal values, and proves that under condition (4) the solution is unique and the mean and variance are given in closed form (Propositions 1-2). It also derives a conditional moment-generating function (Proposition 3) and applies the model to 10-minute counts of juvenile ayu migration in the Nagara River, fitting the parameters a, σ, and the shape of h by least squares to the theoretical mean and variance, and reporting simulated burst statistics. The central claims are that the bridge is well-posed for all volatility regimes, that the fitted model corresponds to a high-volatility (intermittent) regime, and that the model reasonably describes the sub-hourly fish counts.

Significance. The theoretical part of the paper is a useful contribution to the diffusion-bridge literature: it provides an affine CIR-type bridge with closed-form moments, valid in principle for high-volatility regimes, and it employs the iVi scheme, which is simple and positivity-preserving. The explicit formulas (8)-(9) and the simulation algorithm are strengths, and the application is original in its sub-hourly target scale. However, the empirical validation has two load-bearing gaps: the moment fitting ignores the bin-integral structure of the 10-minute count data, and the burst analysis is not compared to the observed data. If these gaps are closed, the paper could be a solid contribution; as it stands, the empirical half of the central claim is not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.3.2, Eqs. (8)-(9), Figs. 7-8] The observed data are 10-minute counts, which are integrals of the rate process over the bin interval, not point observations of Y_s. The theoretical mean and variance in (8)-(9) apply to the instantaneous rate Y_s. For a process with volatility as high as the fitted values, Var(∫_s^{s+Δ} Y_u du) is generally smaller than (Δ)^2 Var(Y_s), so least-squares fitting of σ to the empirical variance of the bin counts can bias σ upward. Since the high-volatility diagnosis (25)-(26) depends on the fitted σ, this is a load-bearing issue. I suggest deriving the moments of the bin integrals from the SDE (or from the explicit moment formulas) and fitting those, or quantifying the bias numerically for the fitted process.
  2. [Section 4.4.3, Tables 8-9, Figs. 12-13] The burst statistics (number and duration of bursts per day) are reported only for simulated paths of the fitted model. The same burst definition (thresholds X* and T* applied to the normalized process) should be applied to the empirical 10-minute counts, which are available for the same days used in fitting. Without an empirical burst histogram or at least a summary of observed bursts, the statement that the model 'can handle both sparse- and dense-burst cases' is not a comparison to the phenomenon. The paper should include this empirical benchmark.
  3. [Section 3.1, Eq. (4)-(5); Section 4.3.1, Eq. (24)] Proposition 1 assumes condition (4), but the second example in (5), which is exactly model 2 used in the application (24), has h(t)=ε/t + 1/(1-t). This function is unbounded near t=0, whereas the upper bound in (4) is finite at t=0 if it is the displayed h_0/(T-t)+ω. Thus model 2 does not satisfy the stated assumptions of Proposition 1, and the proof in Appendix A.1 only controls h near the terminal time T. The authors should either extend the well-posedness theorem to allow initial singularities of the form ε/t, or state and prove a separate well-posedness result for model 2. This is needed because the application relies on model 2.
  4. [Appendix A.1, Eqs. (27)-(29)] The derivation of the mean and variance ODEs (27) and (29) assumes that expectations can be differentiated under the integral and that the first two moments are finite. In the high-volatility case with unbounded h near T, these facts are not immediate and should be justified, e.g., by a truncation argument or by using the explicit solution of the regularized SDE and then passing to the limit. The martingale convergence step is also sketched; providing the localization details would make the proof complete.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.3.1, Eq. (22)] The normalization uses the observed daily total S_k as a scaling factor. It should be stated explicitly that S_k is treated as a known, non-random constant for each day and that the dimensionless model (23) is an additional modeling assumption; the robustness of the fitted parameters to this normalization would be worth a brief discussion.
  2. [Section 4.4.3] The burst thresholds X* and T* are defined in dimensionless units; it would be helpful to report the corresponding physical values (fish per unit time and minutes) so the burst definition is interpretable for fish counters.
  3. [Section 4.4.2, Tables 5-7] The convergence study reports maximum errors but does not state an empirical order of convergence; a short comment on how the error scales with sample size and time step would improve the presentation.
  4. [Throughout] Several equations in the full text are garbled (e.g., (13), (31)-(37)); the final manuscript should be carefully proofread for formula rendering.
  5. [Section 1.1] The statement 'Mathematical models that deal with the fine (sub-daily) dynamics of migrating fish populations have not been studied' is strong; the preceding literature review is adequate but could soften the claim or cite any related sub-daily models.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Empirical validation is in-sample: the mean and variance curves used to fit the parameters are the same curves reported as agreement (Figures 7-9, Table 4), while the mathematical derivation of the moments is self-contained.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3.2 (parameter fitting via Eqs. (8)-(9)) and Section 4.4.1 (Figures 7-9, Table 4)]
    "First, we identify the parameter a and function h using the average (8) through the least-squares method between the theoretical and empirical averages. This is because the average is independent of σ. Second, we identify the parameter σ using the variance (9) through a least-squares method between the theoretical and empirical variances, where we assume the fitted results of a and h. ... Figures 7, 8, and 9 are comparisons of the theoretical and empirical averages, standard deviations, and CVs, respectively."

    The parameters (a, h, σ) are estimated by minimizing the discrepancy between the theoretical moments (8)-(9) and the empirical moment curves. The same empirical moment curves are then presented as evidence that the model 'reasonably models' the data, with RMSEs in Table 4 used to prefer model 2. This is not an independent prediction: the agreement in Figures 7-8 is the least-squares objective itself, so the fit is statistically forced by construction. The CV comparison in Figure 9 is a derived combination of the same two fitted moments and adds no independent information. No held-out data or independent statistic is used to validate the fitted moments.

full rationale

The mathematical core of the paper is self-contained and not circular: Proposition 1 proves well-posedness of SDE (2) directly, Propositions 2 and 3 derive the mean, variance, and conditional MGF from the affine structure, and the iVi discretization is benchmarked against those closed-form moments rather than against the data. The only self-citations (e.g., [54] as an example of the martingale convergence theorem) are not load-bearing. The circularity is confined to the empirical validation: Section 4.3.2 fits a, h, σ by least squares against the empirical average and variance curves, and Section 4.4.1 reports agreement of those same curves (Figures 7-9) and RMSEs (Table 4) as evidence that the model is reasonable. That is an in-sample goodness-of-fit display, not a prediction. The burst analysis (Section 4.4.3) is not circular, but it is an independent-validation gap: burst counts and durations are computed only from simulated paths and are compared only qualitatively ('consistent with Figure 6'); no empirical burst statistics are extracted from the 10-min counts with the same threshold and duration definitions. This gap lowers confidence in the empirical claim but is separate from the circularity issue. Overall, the derivation of the CIR bridge and its moments is independent, while the empirical half of the central claim reduces in part to the fitting objective, giving a partial circularity score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard SDE theory for CIR processes, a time-change argument, the affine process machinery for the moment generating function, and two strong biological and data assumptions: that counts can be treated as a continuous diffusion and that all days share the same nondimensional parameters after scaling. The first three are standard tools; the last two are domain assumptions with limited independent support.

free parameters (6)
  • a (nondimensional source parameter) = 0.0599 (model 2, 2023); 0.0666 (model 2, 2024)
    Fitted via least squares against the empirical average (Section 4.3.2, Table 3).
  • epsilon (model 2 shape parameter) = 0.3837 (2023); 0.0808 (2024)
    Controls the additional regularization near the initial time in h(s) = 1/s + 1/(1-s) + epsilon; fitted via least squares against the empirical average.
  • c (model 1 shape parameter) = 1.6473 (2023); 0.5137 (2024)
    Model 1 h(s) = c/(1-s); fitted via least squares; model 1 underperforms model 2.
  • sigma (nondimensional volatility) = 0.5775 (model 2, 2023); 0.5523 (model 2, 2024)
    Fitted via least squares against the empirical variance, using fitted a and h.
  • X* (burst height threshold) = 0.01 (baseline); 0.02 in sensitivity case
    Hand-chosen threshold for defining a burst event in Section 4.4.3; affects burst count statistics.
  • T* (burst duration threshold) = 0.02 (baseline); 0.04 in sensitivity case
    Hand-chosen minimum duration for a burst event; set to be larger than the time step but smaller than 1.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The SDE (2) has a unique pathwise nonnegative solution on [0,T-delta] by standard CIR theory, extended to the terminal time via moment estimates.
    Invoked in Proof of Proposition 1, Section A.1, citing Alfonsi Proposition 1.2.1.
  • standard math The time-change transformation (3) preserves the law of the process.
    Used in Section 2.2 to connect the CIR bridge to a time-changed CIR process with time-dependent source, citing Kazakevicius and Kononovicius.
  • domain assumption The fish count process is a diffusion bridge with zero values at sunrise and sunset, and the 10-minute counts are exact observations of the continuous state variable.
    Section 4.3.1 states 'The unit-time fish count on day k is assumed to follow the CIR bridge X_k', mapping discrete counts to a continuous diffusion without observation error.
  • domain assumption The nondimensionalization ansatz collapses all days to a single set of parameters (a, sigma, h) after scaling by total daily count S_k and day length T_k.
    Section 4.3.1: 'there exists nondimensional constants a>0 and sigma>0 such that ...'; this assumes day-to-day homogeneity of migration dynamics beyond the scaling.
  • standard math Conditional moment-generating function theory for time-inhomogeneous affine processes, specifically the generator form and Riccati equations.
    Used in Proof of Proposition 3, citing Filipovic Theorem 2.13.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CIR bridge for modeling of fish migration on sub-hourly scale." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6NBZSTKJ

@misc{pith2026250607094,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CIR bridge for modeling of fish migration on sub-hourly scale},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6NBZSTKJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07094}
}
read the original abstract

Bridges, which are stochastic processes with pinned initial and terminal conditions, have recently been applied to various problems. We show that a bridge based on the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross process, called a CIR bridge in this paper, reasonably models the intraday number of migrating fish at an observation point in a river. The studied fish migrates between sunrise and sunset each day, which are considered the initial and terminal times, respectively. The CIR bridge is well-defined as a unique pathwise continuous solution to a stochastic differential equation with unbounded drift and diffusion coefficients and potentially represents the on-off intermittency of the fish count data. Our bridge is theoretically novel in that it admits closed-form time-dependent averages and variances, with which the model parameters can be identified efficiently, and is computable by a recently-developed one-step numerical method. The CIR bridge is applied to the sub-hourly migration data of the diadromous fish Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis in the Nagara River, Japan, from February to June.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07094 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparisons of sample paths of CIR process starting from initial condition 0 C = 0 between low-volatility case (blue,  =1 ) and high-volatility case (red,  = 4 ). We set ar ==1 . These sample paths are generated through the iVi scheme (Section 4). 2.2 CIR bridge For each fixed terminal time T  0 , the proposed CIR bridge ( )0 tT XX  = is a pathwise solution to the following SDE: d d d X a t h t X t h t X B t t … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Map of the study area. 4 The fish count on February 26 in 2023 was 0, but the observation window was not available in the data, so we left them blank in the panel (a) and excluded this day from the mathematical modeling in this paper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J., Kocik, J

    Ouellet, V ., Collins, M. J., Kocik, J. F., Saunders, R., Sheehan, T. F., Ogburn, M. B., & Trinko Lake, T. (2022). The diadromous watersheds -ocean continuum: Managing diadromous fish as a community for ecosystem resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 1007599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1007599

    arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    R., Jech, J

    Stevens, J. R., Jech, J. M., Zydlewski, G. B., & Brady, D. C. (2024). Response of estuarine fish biomass to restoration in the Penobscot River, Maine. Estuaries and Coasts, 47(2), 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237- 023-01292-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s12237- 2024

  3. [3]

    & Lassalle, G

    Ashley, M., Murillas, A., Muench, A., Marta-Pedroso, C., Rodwell, L., Rees, S., ... & Lassalle, G. (2023). An evidence base of ecosystems services provided by diadromous fish in the European Atlantic Area. Ecosystem Services, 64, 101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101559

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    J., Bolland, J

    Lothian, A. J., Bolland, J. D., Albright, A. J., Jubb, W . M., Bubb, D. H., Noble, R. A., ... & Lucas, M. C. (2024). Factors influencing European river lamprey passage at a tidal river barrier. Hydrobiologia, 851(20), 4803-4820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05633-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10750-024-05633-z 2024

  5. [5]

    C., Lam, B

    Chan, J. C., Lam, B. Y., Dudgeon, D., & Liew, J. H. (2025). Global consequences of dam -induced river fragmentation on diadromous migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biological Reviews. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70032

    work page doi:10.1111/brv.70032 2025

  6. [6]

    S., O'Leary, C.,

    Dambrine, C., Lambert, P., Elliott, S., Boavida-Portugal, J., Mateus, C. S., O'Leary, C., ... & Lassalle, G. (2023). Connecting population functionality with distribution model predictions to support freshwater and marine management of diadromous fish spec ies. Biological Conservation, 287, 110324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110324

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Verhelst, P ., Reubens, J., Buysse, D., Goethals, P ., Van Wichelen, J., & Moens, T. (2021). Toward a roadmap for diadromous fish conservation: the Big Five considerations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(7), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2361

    work page doi:10.1002/fee.2361 2021

  8. [8]

    & Drouineau, H

    Arevalo, E., Maire, A., Tétard, S., Prévost, E., Lange, F., Marchand, F., ... & Drouineau, H. (2021a). Does global change increase the risk of maladaptation of Atlantic salmon migration through joint modifications of river temperature and discharge?. Proce edings of the Royal Society B, 288(1964), 20211882. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1882

    arXiv 2021

Show all 106 references
  1. [9]

    A., Bass, A

    Lingard, S. A., Bass, A. L., Cook, K. V ., Fortier, M., Price, G. G., & Hinch, S. G. (2023). Evaluating the influence of environmental and biological factors on migration behavior and residence duration of wild subyearling Chinook Salmon in a fjord estuary using miniature acou...

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    M., Diserud, O

    Arevalo, E., Drouineau, H., Tétard, S., Durif, C. M., Diserud, O. H., Poole, W . R., & Maire, A. (2021b). Joint temporal trends in river thermal and hydrological conditions can threaten the downstream migration of the critically endangered European eel. Scientific Reports, 11(...

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    M., Pinder, A

    Boardman, R. M., Pinder, A. C., Piper, A. T., Gutmann Roberts, C., Wright, R. M., & Britton, J. R. (2024). Environmental influences on the phenology of immigrating juvenile eels over weirs at the tidal limit of regulated rivers. Hydrobiologia, 851(18), 4439-4458. https://doi.o...

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    K., Jepsen, N., Kennedy, R., Koed, A., del Villar-Guerra, D., Lennox, R

    Sortland, L. K., Jepsen, N., Kennedy, R., Koed, A., del Villar-Guerra, D., Lennox, R. J., ... & Aarestrup, K. (2024). The effect of trapping on the migration and survival of Atlantic salmon smolts. River Research and Applications, 40(10), 1971-1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4348

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    E., Ramos-Espinoza, D., Braun, D

    Putt, A. E., Ramos-Espinoza, D., Braun, D. C., & Korman, J. (2022). Methods for estimating abundance and associated uncertainty from passive count technologies. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 42(1), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10719

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    M., Ogburn, M

    Fowler, C. M., Ogburn, M. B., Aguilar, R., Heggie, K., Legett, H. D., Richie, K. D., & Plough, L. V . (2024). Viability of high -frequency environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling as a fish enumeration tool. Ecological Indicators, 166, 112384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112384

    2024

  7. [15]

    Katselis, G., Koukou, K., Dimitriou, E., & Koutsikopoulos, C. (2007). Short-term seaward fish migration in the Messolonghi–Etoliko lagoons (Western Greek coast) in relation to climatic variables and the lunar cycle. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 73(3-4), 571-582. https...

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    B., Alcott, D., Castro-Santos, T., & He, P

    Rillahan, C. B., Alcott, D., Castro-Santos, T., & He, P. (2021). Activity patterns of anadromous fish below a tide gate: Observations from high -resolution imaging sonar. Marine and Coastal Fisheries, 13(3), 200 -212. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcf2.10149

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    B., Pracheil, B

    Bozeman, B. B., Pracheil, B. M., & Matson, P . G. (2024). The environmental impact of hydropower: a systematic review of the ecological effects of sub -daily flow variability on riverine fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11...

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    M., Don, A., & Bolland, J

    Norman, J., Wright, R. M., Don, A., & Bolland, J. D. (2023). Understanding the temporal dynamics of a lowland river fish community at a hazardous intake and floodgate to inform safe operation. Journal of Environmental Management, 336, 117716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman....

    2023

  11. [19]

    Hirano, K., Iwatsuki, Y ., Mimura, F., Yagi, M., & Osa, S. (1996). Time of upstream migration of Ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis, in the Gokase River. Aquaculture Science, 44(1), 1-6. In Japanese with English Abstract. https://doi.org/10.11233/aquaculturesci1953.44.1 36

    1996 doi

  12. [20]

    Sato, D., & Seguchi, Y. (2024). Estimation of ayu-fish migration status and passage time through the Yodo river barrage fishway. Advances in River Engineering, 30, 1-4. In Japanese .https://doi.org/10.11532/river.30.0_1

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    D., McLaren, B

    Burchfield, J. D., McLaren, B. E., & McLeod, D. T. (2022). Sensitivity analysis of a lake sturgeon population with early life stage density-dependent effects. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 79(11), 1992-

    2022

  14. [22]

    A., & Bernard, J

    Bishop, M. A., & Bernard, J. W . (2021). An empirical Bayesian approach to incorporate directional movement information from a forage fish into the Arnason -Schwarz mark-recapture model. Movement Ecology, 9, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-021-00241-1

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    J., Pandit, S

    Bosch, W. J., Pandit, S. N., Newsome, T., Matala, A. P ., Frederiksen, C., Mays, Z., ... & Blodgett, J. (2025). emigration and survival of hatchery-reared coho salmon released as parr and smolts in a reintroduction program. River Research and Applications. Published online. ht...

    2025 doi

  16. [24]

    Cherbero, M., Teichert, N., De Oliveira, E., & Le Pichon, C. (2025). Coastal to riverine entry timing during the spawning migration of the European Shads (Alosa spp.): Drivers and phenological trends for the french atlantic coast populations. Aquatic Conse rvation: Marine and ...

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    J., Thurow, R

    Wohner, P. J., Thurow, R. F., & Peterson, J. T. (2024). Evaluating streamflow and temperature effects on Bull Trout migration and survival with linear spatial capture–recapture models. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 153(3), 326-346. https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10464

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Yan, X., Yang, Z., Zeng, Q., Yang, Q., Lu, Q., Yan, L., ... & Hu, P . (2025). Proposal for ecological operation of cascade reservoirs to safeguard reproductive migration and egg development in drifting -egg fish. Journal of Cleaner Production, 496, 145154. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2025

  19. [27]

    Ross, K., & Merz, J. (2025). Life cycle model demonstrates life-history diversity value and recovery options for a reduced pacific salmonid population at the southern extent of its range. Environmental Modeling & Assessment. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-025-10027-z

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    A., & Brenden, T

    Lewandoski, S. A., & Brenden, T. O. (2022). Forecasting suppression of invasive sea lamprey in Lake Superior. Journal of Applied Ecology, 59(8), 2023-2035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14203

    2022

  21. [29]

    Torstenson, M., & Shaw, A. K. (2025). Strength of seasonality and type of migratory cue determine the fitness consequences of changing phenology for migratory animals. Oikos, 2025(1), e10862. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10862

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    Yoshioka, H., & Yamazaki, K. (2025). A jump -driven self-exciting stochastic fish migration model and its fisheries applications. Natural Resource Modeling, 38(1), e12419. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12419

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    Yoshioka, H. (2025). Superposition of interacting stochastic processes with memory and its application to migrating fish counts. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 192, 115911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115911

    2025

  24. [32]

    Tsukamoto, K., Masuda, N., Endo, M., & Otake, T. (1990). Behavioural characteristics of the ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis, as predictive indices for stocking effectiveness in rivers. NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 56(8), 1177-

    1990

  25. [33]

    C., Hughston, L

    Brody, D. C., Hughston, L. P ., & Yang, X. (2022). On the pricing of storable commodities. In Financial Informatics: An Information-Based Approach to Asset Pricing, Edited by: Brody, D. et al., pp. 393-404, World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811246494_0017

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Lee, H., Ha, H., Kong, B., & Lee, M. (2024). Valuing three-asset barrier options and autocallable products via exit probabilities of Brownian bridge. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 73, 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102174

    2024

  27. [35]

    L., Bastian -Pinto, C

    Marques, N. L., Bastian -Pinto, C. D. L., & Brandão, L. E. T. (2021). Crossing the Brownian Bridge: valuing infrastructure capacity expansion policies as real options. Construction Management and Economics, 39(3), 261-

    2021

  28. [36]

    Curtis, G., Ramkrishna, D., & Narsimhan, V. (2025). Brownian bridges for contained random walks. AIChE Journal, e18658. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.18658

    2025 doi

  29. [37]

    K., & Majumdar, S

    Hartmann, A. K., & Majumdar, S. N. (2025). Exact joint distributions of three global characteristic times for Brownian motion. Physical Review E, 111(4), 044134. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.111.044134

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    N., Das, A., & Limmer, D

    Singh, A. N., Das, A., & Limmer, D. T. (2025). Variational path sampling of rare dynamical events. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-083122-115001

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    B., Crawford, D

    Chandler, R. B., Crawford, D. A., Garrison, E. P ., Miller, K. V., & Cherry, M. J. (2022). Modeling abundance, distribution, movement and space use with camera and telemetry data. Ecology, 103(10), e3583. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3583

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    G., & Skarin, A

    Niu, M., Blackwell, P . G., & Skarin, A. (2016). Modeling interdependent animal movement in continuous time. Biometrics, 72(2), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12454

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    V ., & Blackwell, P

    Tishkovskaya, S. V ., & Blackwell, P. G. (2021). Bayesian estimation of heterogeneous environments from animal movement data. Environmetrics, 32(6), e2679. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2679

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    (2025, March)

    Huang, Y., & Birdal, T. (2025, March). Cellular -guided graph generative model. In Learning Meaningful Representations of Life (LMRL) Workshop at ICLR 2025. https://openreview.net/forum?id=98R53amjcB

    2025

  35. [43]

    Heng, J., De Bortoli, V ., & Doucet, A. (2024). Diffusion Schrödinger bridges for Bayesian computation. Statistical Science, 39(1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1214/23-STS908 37

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    Peluchetti, S. (2023). Diffusion bridge mixture transports, Schrödinger bridge problems and generative modeling. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(374), 1-51. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v24/23-0527.html

    2023

  37. [45]

    A unified diffusion bridge framework via stochastic optimal control

    Zhu, K., Pan, M., Ma, Y ., Fu, Y., Y u, J., Wang, J., & Shi, Y. A unified diffusion bridge framework via stochastic optimal control. In ICLR 2025 Workshop on Deep Generative Model in Machine Learning: Theory, Principle and Efficacy. https://openreview.net/forum?id=pqX8Mw3AZV

    2025

  38. [46]

    N., & Schehr, G

    De Bruyne, B., Majumdar, S. N., & Schehr, G. (2022). Optimal resetting Brownian bridges via enhanced fluctuations. Physical Review Letters, 128(20), 200603. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.200603

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    C., Blythe, R

    Sunil, J. C., Blythe, R. A., Evans, M. R., & Majumdar, S. N. (2024). Minimizing the profligacy of searches with reset. Physical Review E, 110(5), 054122. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.054122

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Mazzolo, A. (2017). Constraint Ornstein -Uhlenbeck bridges. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 58(9). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5000077

    2017 doi

  41. [49]

    N., & Glew, D

    Makarov, R. N., & Glew, D. (2010). Exact simulation of Bessel diffusions. Monte Carlo Methods Appl, 16, 283-

    2010

  42. [50]

    Szavits-Nossan, J., & Evans, M. R. (2015). Inequivalence of nonequilibrium path ensembles: the example of stochastic bridges. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2015(12), P12008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2015/12/P12008

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    N., & Orland, H

    Majumdar, S. N., & Orland, H. (2015). Effective Langevin equations for constrained stochastic processes. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2015(6), P06039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 5468/2015/06/P06039

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    Chen, Y., & Georgiou, T. (2015). Stochastic bridges of linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(2), 526-531. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2015.2440567

    2015

  45. [53]

    Maoutsa, D., & Opper, M. (2022). Deterministic particle flows for constraining stochastic nonlinear systems. Physical Review Research, 4(4), 043035. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043035

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Yoshioka, H., & Yamazaki, K. (2023). A jump Ornstein–Uhlenbeck bridge based on energy-optimal control and its self -exciting extension. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 7, 1536 -1541. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCSYS.2023.3271422

    2023

  47. [55]

    C., Ingersoll, J

    Cox, J. C., Ingersoll, J. E., & Ross, S. A. (1985). A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53, 385-407. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911242

    1985 doi

  48. [56]

    J., Emerenini, B

    Shakiba, N., Edholm, C. J., Emerenini, B. O., Murillo, A. L., Peace, A., Saucedo, O., ... & Allen, L. J. (2021). Effects of environmental variability on superspreading transmission events in stochastic epidemic models. Infectious Disease Modelling, 6, 560-583. https://doi.org/...

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    E., Shi, P ., Drewes, M., & Cecil, J

    Helm, J. E., Shi, P ., Drewes, M., & Cecil, J. (2024). Delta coverage: The analytics journey to implement a novel nurse deployment program. INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics, 54(5), 431 -454. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2024.0140

    2024

  50. [58]

    Yoshioka, H., & Yoshioka, Y. (2024). Risk assessment of river water quality using long-memory processes subject to divergence or Wasserstein uncertainty. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 38(8), 3007-

    2024

  51. [59]

    F., Choi, Y., & Nazarenko, S

    Lo, C. F., Choi, Y., & Nazarenko, S. (2025). Stochastic heat engine acting like a weakly nonlinear wave ensemble. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 191, 115836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115836

    2025

  52. [60]

    Campolieti, G., Makarov, R., & Wouterloot, K. (2013). Pricing step options under the CEV and other solvable diffusion models. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 16(05), 1350027. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024913500271

    2013 doi

  53. [61]

    Glanzer, M., & Pflug, G. C. (2020). Multiscale stochastic optimization: modeling aspects and scenario generation. Computational Optimization and Applications, 75(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-019-00135-4

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    Baldassarri, A. (2021). Universal excursion and bridge shapes in abbm/cir/bessel processes. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2021(8), 083211. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ac1404

    2021 doi

  55. [63]

    L., Nguyen, D

    Chau, H., Kirkby, J. L., Nguyen, D. H., Nguyen, D., Nguyen, N., & Nguyen, T. (2024). An efficient method to simulate diffusion bridges. Statistics and Computing, 34(4), 131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-024-10439-z

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    Abi Jaber, E. (2024). Simulation of square-root processes made simple: applications to the Heston model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.11264

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Abi Jaber, E., & Attal, E. (2025). Simulating integrated Volterra square -root processes and Volterra Heston models via Inverse Gaussian. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19885

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Llamazares-Elias, S., & Tocino, Á. A. (2025). Preservation of structural properties of the CIR model by θ- Milstein schemes. Monte Carlo Methods and Applications. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma- 2025-2009

    2025 doi

  59. [67]

    Mickel, A., & Neuenkirch, A. (2023). The weak convergence order of two Euler-type discretization schemes for the log -Heston model. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 43(6), 3326 -3356. https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drac069

    2023 doi

  60. [68]

    Müller-Gronbach, T., & Yaroslavtseva, L. (2024). On the complexity of strong approximation of stochastic differential equations with a non -Lipschitz drift coefficient. Journal of Complexity, 85, 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2024.101870

    2024

  61. [69]

    Spagnolo, B., Valenti, D., & Fiasconaro, A. (2004). Noise in ecosystems: a short review. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 1(1), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2004.1.185 38

    2004 doi

  62. [70]

    Introduction to continuous-time stochastic processes

    Capasso, V., & Bakstein, VD (2021). Introduction to continuous-time stochastic processes. Birkhäuser, Cham

    2021

  63. [71]

    Alfonsi, A. (2015). Affine Diffusions and Related Processes: Simulation, Theory and Applications. Springer, Cham

    2015

  64. [72]

    Kazakevičius, R., & Kononovicius, A. (2023). Anomalous diffusion and long-range memory in the scaled voter model. Physical Review E, 107(2), 024106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.024106

    2023 doi

  65. [73]

    Eliazar, I., & Arutkin, M. (2025). Designing selfsimilar diffusions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 658, 130270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130270

    2025

  66. [74]

    Backhoff-Veraguas, J., & Beiglböck, M. (2024). The most exciting game. Electronic Communications in Probability, 29, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1214/24-ECP574

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    D., Possamaï, D., & Reisinger, C

    Guo, G., Howison, S. D., Possamaï, D., & Reisinger, C. (2024). Randomness and early termination: what makes a game exciting?. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 192, 135 -162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-024- 01340-x

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    Bansaye, V., & Méléard, S. (2015). Stochastic models for structured populations. Springer, Berlin

    2015

  69. [77]

    Hildebrandt, F., & Rœlly, S. (2020). Pinned diffusions and Markov bridges. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 33(2), 906-917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10959-019-00954-5

    2020 doi

  70. [78]

    I., & Ichinose, G

    Katsumata, Y ., Uehara, T., Ito, H., Yoshimura, J., Tainaka, K. I., & Ichinose, G. (2018). Density -dependent population model of effective release policy for Ayu fish. Ecological Modelling, 388, 80 -87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.09.021

    2018 doi

  71. [79]

    Otake, T., Yamada, C., & Uchida, K. (2002). Contribution of stocked ayu ( Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis) to reproduction in the Nagara River, Japan. Fisheries Science, 68(4), 948 -950. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444- 2906.2002.00516.x

    2002

  72. [80]

    Takizawa, K., Takami, T., Ohashi, H., & Murata, S. (1999). On the Assessment of Biomass Production of Intensively Raised Larval and Juvenile Ayu Plecoglossus altivelis . Fisheries science, 65(4), 503 -506. https://doi.org/10.2331/fishsci.65.503

    1999 doi

  73. [81]

    Yoshioka, H., Tanaka, T., Aranishi, F., Izumi, T., & Fujihara, M. (2019). Stochastic optimal switching model for migrating population dynamics. Journal of Biological Dynamics, 13(1), 706 -732. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2019.1685134

    2019

  74. [82]

    Tajima, Y ., Saito, T., Dasgupta, R., Basu, M., Nishi, M., & Hashimoto, S. (2025). Factors affecting relational values of nature: a case of the Nagara River, Japan. Sustainability Science . Published online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01672-0

    2025 doi

  75. [83]

    Tanaka, M. et al. (2021). Construction of an automatic ayu migration counting system using AI technology at the Nagara River estuary barrage. Chubu Regional Development Bureau Project Research Presentation in 2021. https://www.cbr.mlit.go.jp/kikaku/2021kannai/pdf/te20.pdf

    2021

  76. [84]

    Kusuda, R. (1963). An ecological study of the anadromous “ayu”, Plecoglossus altivelis T. et S. -I. Diurnal variations in the composition of the anadromous ayu schools in the River Okumo, Kyoto. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 29(9), 817-821. In Japanese with English Abstract. https:...

    1963 doi

  77. [85]

    Niimura, Y. (2000). The guide-flow fishways and the brook -type fishways at the Nagara Rivermouth Barrage comparison of function during migration of Ayu fry. Ecology and Civil Engineering, 3(2), 169-178. In Japanese with English Abstract. https://doi.org/10.3825/ece.3.169

    2000 doi

  78. [86]

    Mouri, G., Shinoda, S., & Oki, T. (2010). Estimating Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis migration using a mass balance model expressed by hydrological distribution parameters in a major limpid river basin in Japan. Ecological Modelling, 221(23), 2808-2815. https://doi.org/10.101...

    2010 doi

  79. [87]

    Sasa, K., Goto, K., Sanematsu, T., Shimada, K., Inokuchi, K., and Wada, K. (2005). A study on more efficient monitoring survey of migrating upstream characteristic and anadromous population of juvenile Ayu in mid and downstreams of Nagara River . Advances in River Engineering,...

    2005 doi

  80. [88]

    Takahashi, N., Kitamura, Y ., and Shimizu, K. (2012). Evaluation of the migration environment of ayu under the different flow conditions -A case of the Eino weir in the Hatto River, Sendai River system-. Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural En...

    2012 doi

  81. [89]

    Takase, T., Hashimoto, H., & Anzai, T. (2018). Attempt of estimating the number of ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis) migrating upstream in the middle reach of Tama River. Tokyo Metropolitan Research on Fisheries Science, 6, 20-29. In Japanese with English Abstract. https:...

    2018

  82. [90]

    Nagayama, S., Ohta, T., Fujii, R., Harada, M., & Iizuka, T. (2025). Habitat use and growth strategies of amphidromous fish "ayu" throughout a river system. Scientific Reports , 15:18695. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02988-8

    2025 doi

  83. [91]

    R., Lança, M

    Pereira, E., Quintella, B. R., Lança, M. J., Alexandre, C. M., Mateus, C. S., Pedro, S., ... & Almeida, P . R. (2021). Temporal patterns of the catadromous thinlip grey mullet migration in freshwater. Ecohydrology, 14(8), e2345. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2345

    2021 doi

  84. [92]

    Valenti, D., Tranchina, L., Brai, M., Caruso, A., Cosentino, C., & Spagnolo, B. (2008). Environmental metal pollution considered as noise: Effects on the spatial distribution of benthic foraminifera in two coastal marine areas of Sicily (Southern Italy). E cological modelling,...

    2008 doi

  85. [93]

    Matsumoto, M., & Nishimura, T. (1998). Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo- random number generator. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 8(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/272991.272995

    1998

  86. [94]

    Gontis, V., Kononovicius, A., & Reimann, S. (2012). The class of nonlinear stochastic models as a background for the bursty behavior in financial markets. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(supp01), 1250071. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525912500713

    2012 doi

  87. [95]

    Gontis, V., & Kononovicius, A. (2017). Burst and inter-burst duration statistics as empirical test of long -range memory in the financial markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 483, 266 -272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.04.163

    2017 doi

  88. [96]

    T., Lindner, B., & Kantz, H

    Phillips, E. T., Lindner, B., & Kantz, H. (2025). Stabilizing role of multiplicative noise in nonconfining potentials. Physical Review Research, 7(2), 023146. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023146

    2025 doi

  89. [97]

    Louriki, M. (2022). Brownian bridge with random length and pinning point for modelling of financial information. Stochastics, 94(7), 973-1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442508.2021.2017438

    2022

  90. [98]

    Noto, S., Durighetto, N., Tauro, F., Grimaldi, S., & Botter, G. (2024). Characterizing space-time channel network dynamics in a mediterranean intermittent catchment of central Italy combining visual surveys and cameras. Water Resources Research, 60(1), e2023WR034682. https://d...

    2024 doi

  91. [99]

    Valenti, D., Fazio, G., & Spagnolo, B. (2018). Stabilizing effect of volatility in financial markets. Physical Review E, 97(6), 062307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.062307

    2018 doi

  92. [100]

    Mostafa, F., & JS Allen, L. (2024). Periodic mean -reverting stochastic differential equations and parameter estimations for seasonal data. Stochastic Models. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326349.2024.2430791

    2024

  93. [101]

    Filipović, D. (2005). Time-inhomogeneous affine processes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 115(4), 639-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2004.11.006

    2005 doi

  94. [276]

    https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2020.1863439

    2020

  95. [306]

    https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma.2010.010

    2010 doi

  96. [1186]

    https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.56.1177

    doi

  97. [2005]

    https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2021-0339

    2021 doi

  98. [3030]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02726-y

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.