Sharp estimates for the spreading speed of the Lotka-Volterra diffusion system with strong competition

Chang-Hong Wu; Maolin Zhou; Rui Peng

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Sharp estimates for the spreading speed of the Lotka-Volterra diffusion system with strong competition

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves exact spreading speeds and front profiles for the two-species strong-competition Lotka-Volterra diffusion system in three regimes, including a logarithmic slowdown and a two-front terrace.

desk verdict Genuine sharp spreading-speed results for the strong-competition system, but the load-bearing estimate (2.9) is not fully proved and the n-species corollary is unproved; the main theorems are likely correct but the paper needs repair. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05539 v4 pith:6OMNOATU submitted 2019-08-15 math.AP

Rui Peng , Chang-Hong Wu , Maolin Zhou This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35K5735K4592D25

keywords Lotka-Volterradiffusionsystemstrongcompetitionbistabletravelingwavesspreadingspeedfrontprofilelogarithmicslowdownpropagatingterraces

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish sharp long-time behavior for the two-species Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion system (1.1) when competition is strong, $a,b>1$. Under the assumption that species $u$ invades successfully, the claimed result is that the solution converges to explicit traveling-front profiles with exact speeds: a single bistable front when $v$ is a native resident (Theorem 1), a Fisher-KPP front with the logarithmic shift $(3d/c_u)\ln t$ when both species invade and $u$'s single-species speed is larger (Theorem 2), and a two-front terrace when $u$ is the slower invader (Theorem 3). The authors identify these as the first precise speed-and-profile results for the strong-competition system. If correct, the results turn a qualitative statement about invasion into quantitative predictions of where each front is at large times and what shape it has.

What carries the argument

The central object is the unique bistable traveling front $(c_{uv},U,V)$ solving (1.4), which connects the state $(1,0)$ at $-\infty$ to $(0,1)$ at $+\infty$; the proof leans on its exponential tails (Lemmas 2.1-2.2) and its local asymptotic stability, so the solution can be trapped between shifted copies of this wave. The carrying mechanism is the comparison principle for the cooperative system, applied to new supersolutions and subsolutions of the form $U(x-c_{uv}t+\zeta(t))$ and $V(x-c_{uv}t+\zeta(t))$ with small exponentially decaying corrections $p(t),q(t)$ and a slowly relaxing shift $\zeta(t)$, sometimes symmetrized as sums $U(x-c_{uv}t+\zeta(t))+U(-x-c_{uv}t+\zeta(t))-1$ to handle a resident species occupying the whole line. For the faster-species results, the system is reduced to a perturbed Fisher-KPP equation, and the level-set method of [27] produces the logarithmic time shifts.

What would settle it

Run a numerical simulation of (1.1) in the strong-competition regime, for example with $d=r=1$ and $b>a>1$ chosen so that $c_{uv}>0$, with compactly supported $u_0$ and $v_0$ bounded below; measure $\max_{|x|\le ct}|u(t,x)-1|$ and $\max_{|x|\le ct}v(t,x)$ for some fixed $c<c_{uv}$. If the latter does not decay to zero, or to zero exponentially, then Lemma 2.6 and the results built on it are false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, under assumptions (H) and (A1), the solution converges on $x\ge 0$ to the unique bistable front $(c_{uv},U,V)$ of (1.4): there is a shift $\hat h$ such that $$\sup_{x\ge 0}|u(t,x)-U(x-c_{uv}t-\hat h)|+\sup_{x\ge 0}|v(t,x)-V(x-c_{uv}t-\hat h)|\to 0.$$ Under (A2), the regime is governed by the ordering of the single-species Fisher speeds $c_u=2\sqrt{rd}$ and $c_v=2$. If $c_u>c_v$, then $v$ is driven to zero while $u$ approaches $U_{\mathrm{KPP}}(x-c_u t+(3d/c_u)\ln t+\omega(t))$ with bounded $\omega$. If $c_u<c_v$, the system forms a propagating terrace: with $c_0=(c_{uv}+c_v)/2$, the region $x\ge c_0 t$ is a leading $v$-front at speed $c_v$ with the logarithmic correction and $u\to 0$, while on $0\le x<c_0 t$ the pair converges to the bistable front traveling at $c_{uv}$. The authors argue these are the first results of this precision for the strong-competition system.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is estimate (2.9), which asserts that inside every window $|x|\le ct$ with $c<c_{uv}$ the losing species decays to zero and the winner approaches one; if this exponential-decay estimate fails, both the sharp front convergence of Theorem 1 and the terrace construction behind Theorem 3 collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If Theorem 1 is correct, an invader released into a resident population settles into the unique bistable front with speed $c_{uv}$, and the detailed shape of the initial data affects only a translation.
If Theorem 2 is correct, with two invaders and a faster $u$, the slower species $v$ decays exponentially and $u$'s front lags the linear speed $c_u$ by the universal $(3d/c_u)\ln t$ shift.
If Theorem 3 is correct, a slower but stronger competitor does not vanish: the system organizes as a leading $v$-front at speed $c_v$ and a following bistable front at speed $c_{uv}$, a propagating terrace.
A byproduct of the proof is a $C^0$-stability statement for the bistable wave (Lemma 3.6), and the same method yields an $n$-species version (Corollary 4.6) in which the fastest species spreads as a KPP front while all slower species vanish ahead of it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The shift constants $\hat h$ and $\omega(t)$ are shown to exist but not expressed in terms of the initial data; a natural next step is to derive such formulas, which would let early-time data be read off from late-time front positions.
The estimate (2.9) is the logical bottleneck of the paper; a complete written proof of the appendix's omitted case checks, or a direct numerical check of the moving-window decay, would settle the status of the terrace theorem.
Corollary 4.6 suggests a multispecies selection rule: only the fastest single-species speed survives as a KPP front, while all slower species are exponentially suppressed ahead of it; this could be tested in a three-species chain with ordered speeds.
The terrace regime predicts two simultaneously moving fronts at two distinct speeds, giving a field-observable signature of strong competition that could be sought in measurements of two front positions over time.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The three main theorems are likely correct and are a real advance: they give the first sharp front-convergence statements for the strong-competition Lotka-Volterra system under two natural initial-data scenarios, including a Bramson log correction for the faster species in the compact-support case. This substantially sharpens Carrere's earlier speed-only results. The proof architecture is sensible: first establish exponential convergence of the solution to (1,0) on expanding boxes, then construct tailored super/subsolutions, then apply the Bramson machinery to the faster species.

What the paper does well: the super/subsolution constructions are intricate and mostly carefully checked; Theorem 1's stability-plus-sliding-method proof is detailed; the reduction for Theorem 2 to the Hamel-Nolen-Roquejoffre-Ryzhik argument is clean. The external inputs (Gardner/Kan-On bistable fronts, Bramson correction) are independent of the paper, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

Now the soft spots, in proportion.

The main one is the proof of the key estimate (2.9) in Lemma 2.6. All three theorems rest on it. The appendix compresses the argument: it asserts the existence of an ε-perturbed bistable front (4.17) with speed arbitrarily close to c_uv, then applies the tail estimates of Lemma 2.2 to that perturbed front, then compresses the final global comparison. The tail estimates for the perturbed front are not derived (Lemma 2.2 was stated only for the unperturbed front), and continuity of the front family in ε is asserted rather than proved. This is a genuine gap in the printed proof. It is very likely fixable by standard implicit-function/continuation arguments, but as written the paper cannot be certified on this point.

Second, Lemma 3.11's statement has the inequality signs reversed (N1≥0/N2≤0) relative to what the subsection needs and what the proof actually shows (N1≤0/N2≥0). The proof and Lemma 3.12 agree on the intended subsolution inequalities, so it is a typo, but it should be fixed.

Third, the n-species Corollary 4.6 is stated without proof and under weaker hypotheses than the rest of the paper. For n species, the interaction of the slower species can affect the fastest one; "the argument can provide" is not a proof. I would remove it or prove it properly.

Minor: several lemmas say "we omit the details"; these are mostly standard, but combined with the appendix gap they make the proof harder to verify.

Who should read this: researchers in reaction-diffusion spreading speeds and spatial ecology. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send to peer review, but require the appendix to be expanded with a rigorous treatment of the perturbed front, the sign typo fixed, and Corollary 4.6 either proved or cut.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the two-species Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion system (1.1) in the strong-competition regime a,b>1, assuming (H3) that the u species invades successfully. It proves three sharp long-time results: in scenario (A1), where u is invasive and v is native, the solution converges on x≥0 to the bistable traveling front (U,V) with speed c_uv and an explicit shift; in scenario (A2) with c_u>c_v, u converges to a shifted Fisher-KPP front with the Bramson logarithmic correction (3d/c_u) ln t while v decays to zero; and in scenario (A2) with c_u<c_v, a propagating terrace forms with speeds c_uv and c_v, with sharp profile convergence in the two spatial regions separated by c_0 t. The proofs rely on the construction of new sub- and supersolutions, an exponential decay estimate (2.9), and an adaptation of the Hamel-Nolen-Roquejoffre-Ryzhik method for the logarithmic correction. The main theorems are stated with precise convergence in sup-norm on half-lines or moving intervals.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is the first sharp speed-and-profile description for the strong-competition Lotka-Volterra system, going substantially beyond Carrere's earlier spreading-speed results. The paper gives explicit exponential decay estimates (Lemma 2.6 and Lemma 2.8), a new stability proof for the bistable front via sub/supersolutions (Lemmas 3.1 and 3.3), and the first derivation of Bramson-type logarithmic shifts for this system (Theorems 2 and 3). The arguments are self-contained in structure, with the main external inputs being the Gardner/Kan-On existence and uniqueness of the bistable front and the HNRR logarithmic-correction method for the scalar KPP equation; there are no fitted parameters and no circular assumption of the results being proved. The paper also states a corollary for n-species systems, although this corollary is not proved in the body of the text. Overall, the claimed results are significant and likely correct, but the printed proof contains several gaps and sign inconsistencies that prevent full certification as written.

major comments (4)

[§3.3.2, Lemma 3.11 and Lemma 3.12] Lemma 3.11 is stated as asserting N1[u,v] ≥ 0 and N2[u,v] ≤ 0 for the functions defined in (3.61), but the proof actually derives N1[u,v] ≤ 0 and N2[u,v] ≥ 0 (see, e.g., the conclusions after Cases 1-3). The latter inequalities are what is needed for a subsolution and what Lemma 3.12 uses. In addition, Lemma 3.12 states ζ1 < 0 while Lemma 3.11 requires ζ1 > 0 (so that ζ′(t) > 0), and the proof of Lemma 3.12 also selects ζ1 < 0, contradicting the hypothesis of Lemma 3.11. As written, the subsolution construction is internally inconsistent in both the sign of the differential inequalities and the sign of the shift parameter; the text must be corrected so that the lemma statements match the proofs and the comparison principle.
[Appendix, proof of (2.9)] The estimate (2.9) is the load-bearing foundation for Lemma 2.6, Lemma 2.8, and ultimately all three theorems, but its proof is deferred to an appendix that leaves several essential points unjustified. In particular, the appendix introduces an ε-perturbed front (U,V) satisfying (4.17) and then applies Lemma 2.2 tail estimates directly to this perturbed front (see the lines after (4.19)), although Lemma 2.2 is only stated for the unperturbed front of (1.4); one needs to show that the analogous exponential estimates hold for (U,V) with constants uniform as ε→0. Furthermore, the final comparison step after (4.18) is compressed to a few lines: the existence of L, the choice of T-hat, and the verification that u(T+T-hat,x) ≥ u(T,x) and v(T+T-hat,x) ≤ v(T,x) on all of R are not fully detailed. Because a failure of (2.9) would invalidate the exponential-decay arguments in the rest of the paper, this gap must be closed or the estimate must be proved directly.
[§3.1.2, Lemma 3.3] Lemma 3.3 is used to prove Lemma 3.5, which is essential for Proposition 1 and hence Theorem 1, but its proof omits the details for Case (ii) and Case (iii), stating only that they are handled similarly to the corresponding cases in Lemma 3.1. Since the supersolution signs in (3.16) require reversing several inequalities compared with Lemma 3.1, the reader cannot verify the claimed inequality N1 ≥ 0 and N2 ≤ 0 in the middle and trailing regions without a written check. The omitted cases should be supplied.
[§4.2, Lemma 4.9] Lemma 4.9 is the key convergence statement for Theorem 3, but the final step of its proof is omitted with the remark that one follows the proof of Proposition 1. This is not a routine repetition: the convergence here must be established on the moving interval [0,ct) with a boundary at ct, and it must be combined with the exponential decay of u on [ct,∞) from Lemma 4.7 and the lower bound for v from Lemma 4.8. The details of the limiting argument and the passage to the sup-norm on [0,ct) need to be written out explicitly for the terrace result to be certified.

minor comments (4)

[Lemma 2.8] In the proof of Lemma 2.8, the display after the comparison step reads 'u(t,x) ≥ 1 −Me δ2t', which should be '1 − M e^{−δ2 t}' with a negative exponent; otherwise the claimed exponential convergence is misstated.
[§3.3.2, Lemma 3.12] The parameter condition in the statement of Lemma 3.12 is 'ζ1 < 0', but the proof and the hypotheses of Lemma 3.11 require ζ1 > 0; the sign should be corrected for consistency.
[Corollary 4.6] Corollary 4.6 states an n-species generalization without proof and without any indication of the additional hypotheses (such as strong competition among all pairs) needed for the arguments of the paper to apply. It would be appropriate to state it as a remark or conjecture, or to provide a proof sketch.
[Appendix, notation] In the appendix, the ε-perturbed front satisfying (4.17) is denoted by the same symbols (U,V) as the original front of (1.4). This creates confusion in expressions such as 'by Lemma 2.2' where the lemma refers to the original front. It would be clearer to write (U_ε,V_ε) and to restate the required tail estimates for the perturbed front.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the sharp convergence proofs are built on independent external front theory and the paper's own explicit super/subsolution constructions, not on self-referential inputs.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the central convergence claims rest on (i) the bistable-front existence, uniqueness, and stability results of Gardner [20] and Kan-On [29,30]; (ii) Carrere's spreading results [6], used for (2.13) and (4.7); (iii) the Bramson logarithmic-correction argument of Hamel-Nolen-Roquejoffre-Ryzhik [27]; and (iv) the paper's own explicit super/subsolution constructions (Lemmas 3.1-3.12, Lemmas 4.1-4.9, and the Appendix). None of these inputs is a renamed version of the target theorems. The one deferred common estimate (2.9) is proved in the Appendix by constructing a perturbed bistable front (4.17); the existence of that front is cited to Kan-On's parameter-continuity result, not assumed, and the comparison is run against the assumed local convergence (H3), so the conclusion lim_{t->∞}[max_{|x|<=ct}|u-1| + max v] = 0 is not an input. The self-citations appearing in the introduction and remarks ([11,12,26] involve co-authors of the present paper) are background or extension comments and are not used to prove Theorems 1-3. No fitted parameter is later renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation: the front profiles (3.3), (3.14), (3.43), (3.61) are explicitly constructed and verified in the text. The genuine caveats are rigor issues rather than circularity: the Appendix proof of (2.9) is compressed and omits some case details, and the statement of Lemma 3.11 inverts the inequalities (its proof derives N1<=0 and N2>=0, which is what Lemma 3.12 actually uses). These affect certifiability of the printed argument but do not make any central claim equivalent to its own assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard PDE tools and explicitly stated competition and invasion hypotheses. No new entities are introduced and no constants are fitted to data. The heaviest external inputs are bistable front theory and the Bramson correction, both independently established.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Strong competition (H1): a>1, b>1; wave speed positivity (H2): cuv>0; successful invasion (H3).
Stated as standing hypotheses in Section 1; all theorems are conditional on them. H3 is discussed in Remark 3.2.
domain assumption Initial data satisfy (A1) or (A2), meaning either u is invasive and v is native, or both are compactly supported.
These scenarios define the two situations treated in Theorems 1-3.
standard math Existence, uniqueness, and exponential tail asymptotics of the bistable traveling front (cuv,U,V) from [20,29,30,43].
Used throughout via Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2 for the profile shape of U and V.
standard math Comparison principle for the cooperative form of (1.1).
The basis for all super/subsolution arguments, stated as Lemma 2.3.
standard math Scalar Fisher-KPP Bramson logarithmic correction from [4,27,34,51].
Used in Lemma 4.1, Lemma 4.4, and Theorem 2 to get the (3d/cu) ln t shift.
standard math Carrere's spreading results for the bistable competition system from [6], including (4.7).
Used in Lemma 4.7 for the cu<cv case; the paper says the proof follows with slight modifications.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp estimates for the spreading speed of the Lotka-Volterra diffusion system with strong competition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OMNOATU

@misc{pith2026190805539,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp estimates for the spreading speed of the Lotka-Volterra diffusion system with strong competition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OMNOATU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05539}
}

read the original abstract

This paper is concerned with the classical two-species Lotka-Volterra diffusion system with strong competition. The sharp dynamical behavior of the solution is established in two different situations: either one species is an invasive one and the other is a native one or both are invasive species. Our results seem to be the first that provide a precise spreading speed and profile for such a strong competition system. Among other things, our analysis relies on the construction of new types of supersolution and subsolution, which are optimal in certain sense.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

[1]

Aronson and H.F

D.G. Aronson and H.F. Weinberger, Nonlinear diﬀusion in population genetics, combustion, and nerve pulse propagation, in Partial Diﬀerential Equations and Related Topics, Lect ure Notes in Math., Vol. 446, Springer, Berlin, 1975, 5–49

work page 1975
[2]

Aronson and H.F

D.G. Aronson and H.F. Weinberger, Multidimensional nonlinear diﬀusions arising in populatio n genetics , Adv. Math., 30 (1978), 33–76

work page 1978
[3]

Bao, Z.-C

X. Bao, Z.-C. Wang, Existence and stability of time periodic traveling waves fo r a periodic bistable lotka-Volterra competition system, J. Diﬀerential Equations, 255 (2013), 2402–2435

work page 2013
[4]

Bramson, Convergence of solutions of the Kolmogorov equation to trav elling waves , Mem

M. Bramson, Convergence of solutions of the Kolmogorov equation to trav elling waves , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 44 (1983)

work page 1983
[5]

R. S. Cantrell, C. Cosner, Spatial Ecology via Reaction-diﬀusion Equations , Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2003

work page 2003
[6]

Carrere, Spreading speeds for a two-species competition-diﬀusion sy stem

C. Carrere, Spreading speeds for a two-species competition-diﬀusion sy stem. J. Diﬀerential Equations, 264 (2018), 2133–2156

work page 2018
[7]

Chen, Existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of travel ing waves in nonlocal evolution equations , Adv

X. Chen, Existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of travel ing waves in nonlocal evolution equations , Adv. Diﬀerential Equations, 2 (1997), 125–160

work page 1997
[8]

Chen, J.-C

X. Chen, J.-C. Tsai, Y. Wu, Longtime behavior of solutions of a SIS epidemiological mod el, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 49 (2017), 3925–3950

work page 2017

Show all 54 references

[9]

Y. Du, B. Lou, Spreading and vanishing in nonlinear diﬀusion problems with free boundaries, J. Eur. Math. Soc., 17 (2015) 2673–2724

2015
[10]

Y. Du, H. Matsuzawa, M. Zhou, Spreading speed and proﬁle for nonlinear Stefan problems in high space dimensions, J. Math. Pures Appl., 103 (2015), 741–787

2015
[11]

Y. Du, M.X. Wang, M. Zhou, Semi-wave and spreading speed for the diﬀusive competition m odel with a free boundary, J. Math. Pures Appl., 107 (2017), 253–287

2017
[12]

Du, C.-H

Y. Du, C.-H. Wu, Spreading with two speeds and mass segregation in a diﬀusive c ompetition system with free boundaries, Cal. Var. PDE, (2018) 57:52

2018
[13]

Ducrot, T

A. Ducrot, T. Giletti, H. Matano, Existence and convergence to a propagating terrace in one-d imensional reaction-diﬀusion equations , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), 5541–5566

2014
[14]

Ducrot, T

A. Ducrot, T. Giletti and H. Matano, Spreading speeds for multidimensional reaction-diﬀusion s ystems of the prey-predator type, Cal. Var. PDE, (2019) 58:137

2019
[15]

Fang, X.-Q

J. Fang, X.-Q. Zhao, Bistable traveling waves for monotone semiﬂows with applic ations, J. Eur. Math. Soc., 17 (2015), 2243–2288

2015
[16]

G. Faye, M. Holzer, Asymptotic stability of the critical pulled front in a Lotka -Volterra competition model , arXiv:1904.03174

1904 arXiv
[17]

P. C. Fife, J. B. McLeod, The approach of solutions of nonlinear diﬀusion equations to travelling front solutions , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 65 (1977), 335–361

1977
[18]

Fisher, The wave of advance of advantageous genes , Ann

R.A. Fisher, The wave of advance of advantageous genes , Ann. Eugenics, 7 (1937), 335–369

1937
[19]

Friedman, Parabolic Diﬀerential Equations of Parabolic Type , Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliﬀs, N.J., 1964

A. Friedman, Parabolic Diﬀerential Equations of Parabolic Type , Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliﬀs, N.J., 1964

1964
[20]

Gardner, Existence and stability of traveling wave solutions of comp etition models: a degree theoretic , J

R.A. Gardner, Existence and stability of traveling wave solutions of comp etition models: a degree theoretic , J. Diﬀerential Equations, 44 (1982), 343–364

1982
[21]

Giletti, H

T. Giletti, H. Matano, Existence and uniqueness of propagating terraces . Commun. Contemp. Math. (to ap- pear)
[22]

Girardin, The eﬀect of random dispersal on competitive exclusion-a rev iew, Mathematical Biosciences, 318 (2019), 108271

L. Girardin, The eﬀect of random dispersal on competitive exclusion-a rev iew, Mathematical Biosciences, 318 (2019), 108271

2019
[23]

Girardin, K.-Y

L. Girardin, K.-Y. Lam, Invasion of an empty habitat by two competitors: spreading p roperties of monostable two-species competition-diﬀusion systems , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 119 (2019), 1279–1335

2019
[24]

Girardin, G

L. Girardin, G. Nadin, Travelling waves for diﬀusive and strongly competitive syst ems: relative motility and invasion speed, European J. Appl. Math., 26 (2015), 521–534

2015
[25]

Guo, Y.-C

J.-S. Guo, Y.-C. Lin, The sign of the wave speed for the Lotka-Volterra competitio n-diﬀusion system , Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 12 (2013), 2083-2090

2013
[26]

Guo, C.-H

J.-S. Guo, C.-H. Wu, Entire solutions originating from traveling fronts for a tw o-species competition-diﬀusion system, Nonlinearity, 32 (2019), 3234

2019
[27]

Hamel, J

F. Hamel, J. Nolen, J.-M. Roquejoﬀre, and L. Ryzhik, A short proof of the logarithmic Bramson correction in Fisher-KPP equations , Netw. Heterog. Media, 8 (2013), 275–289

2013
[28]

M. Iida, R. Lui, H. Ninomiya, Stacked fronts for cooperative systems with equal diﬀusion c oeﬃcients , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 43 (2011), 1369–1389

2011
[29]

Kan-On, Parameter dependence of propagation speed of travelling wa ves for competition-diﬀusion equations , SIAM J

Y. Kan-On, Parameter dependence of propagation speed of travelling wa ves for competition-diﬀusion equations , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 26 (1995), 340–363. 46 RUI PENG, CHANG-HONG WU, AND MAOLIN ZHOU

1995
[30]

Kan-on, Q

Y. Kan-on, Q. Fang, Stability of monotone travelling waves for competition-di ﬀusion equations , Japan J. Indust. Appl. Math., 13 (1996), 343–349

1996
[31]

Kaneko, H

Y. Kaneko, H. Matsuzawa, Spreading speed and sharp asymptotic proﬁles of solutions i n free boundary problems for nonlinear advection-diﬀusion equations , J. Math. Anal. Appl., 428 (2015), 43–76

2015
[32]

Kolmogorov, I.G

A.N. Kolmogorov, I.G. Petrovsky and N.S. Piskunov, Study of the diﬀusion equation with growth of the quantity of matter and its application to a biological problem . Bull. Univ. Etat. Moscow Ser. Internat. Math. Mec. Sect. A, 1 (1937), 1–29

1937
[33]

K.-Y. Lam, R. B. Salako, Q. Wu, Entire solutions of diﬀusive Lotka-Volterra system , preprint (arXiv:2002.00308)

2002 arXiv
[34]

Lau, On the nonlinear diﬀusion equation of Kolmogorov, Petrovsky , and Piscounov , J

K.-S. Lau, On the nonlinear diﬀusion equation of Kolmogorov, Petrovsky , and Piscounov , J. Diﬀerential Equa- tions, 59 (1985), 44–70

1985
[35]

Lewis, B

M.A. Lewis, B. Li, H.F. Weinberger, Spreading speeds and the linear conjecture for two-species competition models, J. Math. Biol., 45 (2002) 219–233

2002
[36]

B. Li, H. F. Weinberger, M. A. Lewis, Spreading speeds as slowest wave speeds for cooperative sys tems, Math. Biosci., 196 (2005), 82–98

2005
[37]

Liang, X.-Q

X. Liang, X.-Q. Zhao, Asymptotic speeds of spread and traveling waves for monoton e semiﬂows with applica- tions. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 60 (2007), 1–40

2007
[38]

Lin, W.-T

G. Lin, W.-T. Li, Asymptotic spreading of competition diﬀusion systems: the r ole of interspeciﬁc competitions . European J. Appl. Math., 23 (2012), 669–689

2012
[39]

Q. Liu, S. Liu, K.-Y. Lam, Asymptotic spreading of interacting species with multiple fronts I: A geometric optics approach, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A, 40 (2020), 3683–3714

2020
[40]

Q. Liu, S. Liu, K.-Y. Lam, Asymptotic spreading of interacting species with multiple fronts II: Exponentially decaying initial data , preprint
[41]

M. Ma, Z. Huang, C. Ou, Speed of the traveling wave for the bistable Lotka-Volterra competition model, Non- linearity, 32 (2019), 3143–3162

2019
[42]

J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993

1993
[43]

Morita, K

Y. Morita, K. Tachibana, An entire solution for wave fronts to the Lotka-Volterra com petition-diﬀusion equa- tions, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 40 (2009), 2217–2240

2009
[44]

Pol´ aˇ cik,Propagating terraces and the dynamics of front-like soluti ons of reaction-diﬀusion equations on R, Mem

P. Pol´ aˇ cik,Propagating terraces and the dynamics of front-like soluti ons of reaction-diﬀusion equations on R, Mem. Am. Math. Soc, 264 (2020), no. 1278

2020
[45]

M. H. Protter, H. F. Weinberger, Maximum Principles in Diﬀerential Equations . Springer-Verlag, 1984

1984
[46]

Rodrigo, M

M. Rodrigo, M. Mimura, Exact solutions of a competition-diﬀusion system , Hiroshima Math. J., 30 (2000), 257–270

2000
[47]

Rothe, Convergence to travelling fronts in semilinear parabolic e quations, Proc

F. Rothe, Convergence to travelling fronts in semilinear parabolic e quations, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 80 (1978), 213–234

1978
[48]

Sattinger, On the stability of waves of nonlinear parabolic systems , Adv

D. Sattinger, On the stability of waves of nonlinear parabolic systems , Adv. Math., 22 (1976), 312–355

1976
[49]

Shigesada, K

N. Shigesada, K. Kawasaki, Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice, Oxford Series i n Ecology and Evolution , Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997

1997
[50]

Tsai, Asymptotic stability of traveling wave fronts in the buﬀered bistable system , SIAM J

J.-C. Tsai, Asymptotic stability of traveling wave fronts in the buﬀered bistable system , SIAM J. Math. Anal., 39 (2007), 138–159

2007
[51]

Uchiyama, The behavior of solutions of some nonlinear diﬀusion equatio ns for large time , J

K. Uchiyama, The behavior of solutions of some nonlinear diﬀusion equatio ns for large time , J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 18 (1978), 453–508

1978
[52]

A. I. Volpert, V. A. Volpert, V. A. Volpert, Traveling wa ve solutions of parabolic systems, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1994

1994
[53]

Weinberger, M.A

H.F. Weinberger, M.A. Lewis, B. Li, Analysis of the linear conjecture for spread in cooperative models, J. Math. Biol., 45 (2002) 183–218

2002
[54]

Zhao, Dynamical Systems in Population Biology

X.-Q. Zhao, Dynamical Systems in Population Biology . Springer, New York, 2003. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Jiangsu Normal Unive rsity, Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China E-mail address : pengrui seu@163.com Department of Applied Mathematics...

2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Aronson and H.F

D.G. Aronson and H.F. Weinberger, Nonlinear diﬀusion in population genetics, combustion, and nerve pulse propagation, in Partial Diﬀerential Equations and Related Topics, Lect ure Notes in Math., Vol. 446, Springer, Berlin, 1975, 5–49

work page 1975

[2] [2]

Aronson and H.F

D.G. Aronson and H.F. Weinberger, Multidimensional nonlinear diﬀusions arising in populatio n genetics , Adv. Math., 30 (1978), 33–76

work page 1978

[3] [3]

Bao, Z.-C

X. Bao, Z.-C. Wang, Existence and stability of time periodic traveling waves fo r a periodic bistable lotka-Volterra competition system, J. Diﬀerential Equations, 255 (2013), 2402–2435

work page 2013

[4] [4]

Bramson, Convergence of solutions of the Kolmogorov equation to trav elling waves , Mem

M. Bramson, Convergence of solutions of the Kolmogorov equation to trav elling waves , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 44 (1983)

work page 1983

[5] [5]

R. S. Cantrell, C. Cosner, Spatial Ecology via Reaction-diﬀusion Equations , Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2003

work page 2003

[6] [6]

Carrere, Spreading speeds for a two-species competition-diﬀusion sy stem

C. Carrere, Spreading speeds for a two-species competition-diﬀusion sy stem. J. Diﬀerential Equations, 264 (2018), 2133–2156

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Chen, Existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of travel ing waves in nonlocal evolution equations , Adv

X. Chen, Existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of travel ing waves in nonlocal evolution equations , Adv. Diﬀerential Equations, 2 (1997), 125–160

work page 1997

[8] [8]

Chen, J.-C

X. Chen, J.-C. Tsai, Y. Wu, Longtime behavior of solutions of a SIS epidemiological mod el, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 49 (2017), 3925–3950

work page 2017