Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 63 references

Equivalences via twisted hyperholomorphic sheaves from transverse Lagrangian fibrations

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundle built from two Poincaré equivalences proves the Lefschetz standard conjecture and the D-equivalence conjecture for all projective OG10-type hyperkähler manifolds.

desk verdict A serious, well-structured paper whose twisted-bundle construction is new and useful, but the proof of Theorem 6.9 has a load-bearing integrality gap: the transported B-field is not integral, so the untwisted D-equivalence does not follow as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13403 v1 pith:6OUCEDLE submitted 2026-08-13 math.AG

Moritz Hartlieb , Saket Shah This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AG MSC 14J4214F0814C25
keywords hyperkählermanifoldsOG10typetwistedhyperholomorphicsheavesLagrangianfibrationsLefschetzstandardconjectureD-equivalencecubicfourfoldsTate–Shafarevichtwists
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove two long-standing conjectures for hyperkähler manifolds of O'Grady 10 (OG10) type: Grothendieck's Lefschetz standard conjecture, and the D-equivalence conjecture that birational projective varieties have equivalent bounded derived categories. The route is a new supply of twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundles on products of hyperkähler manifolds, formed by composing two twisted Poincaré equivalences attached to transverse Lagrangian fibrations. Because such bundles deform over twistor families, a derived equivalence established at one point of moduli space propagates to every manifold in the deformation family — the same phenomenon that already settled these conjectures for K3^[n]-type manifolds. In the OG10 case the propagation yields both conjectures; a subsidiary output is a twisted derived equivalence between Fano varieties of lines of two cubic fourfolds.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the convolution $$Q = \Phi_{P_{Y,Z}} \circ \Phi_{P_{X,Y}} \in D^b(X \times Z, \alpha_X \boxtimes \alpha_Z)$$ of the two twisted Poincaré sheaves, a twisted vector bundle of rank $n!k^n$ whose restrictions to the fibers of either projection are stable twisted vector bundles. Its role is to be a hyperholomorphic kernel: stability with respect to polarizations related by the induced Hodge isometry $\psi$ makes it deformable over generic twistor paths, so the twisted derived equivalence it defines at one point of moduli space propagates to all points. The explicit formulas for the B-fields $B'_X, B'_Z$ and for the $k$-cyclic isometry on Lagrangian primitive cohomology are what allow the OG10 applications.

What would settle it

Compute the action of the Poincaré-sheaf Fourier–Mukai isometry directly on an integral class $\lambda$ of small negative square (say square $-1$ or $-2$) in $H^2_{\mathrm{lprim}}(X,\mathbb{Z})$ for an explicit compactified Jacobian or LSV example; Proposition 4.5 asserts the image is $\pm \lambda$ for every class, while its proof only covers classes of sufficiently large negative square, so a single small class with a different image would show the claim is false as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the convolution $Q$ of two twisted Poincaré sheaves — one from $X$ to a common fibered manifold $Y$ and one from $Y$ to $Z$, where $X, Y, Z$ are hyperkähler manifolds of K3^[n]- or OG10-type — is itself a twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundle on $X \times Z$ (Theorem 5.8). Its fiberwise stability with respect to suitable polarizations is inherited from modular stability theorems for twisted Poincaré sheaves, and the induced Hodge isometry $\psi$ on $H^2$ is explicitly controlled, so $Q$ deforms along diagonal twistor lines to a twisted vector bundle at every point of the relevant moduli space of Hodge isometries. At each deformed point the bundle still induces a twisted derived equivalence, by the deformation principle for hyperholomorphic bundles. Specializing to OG10-type and combining the resulting equivalences with the known mechanism that turns a nonzero-rank Fourier–Mukai kernel into a proof of the Lefschetz standard conjecture, the paper derives Theorem 6.1; a chamber-by-chamber argument adapting the K3^[n]-type strategy gives Theorem 6.9, the D-equivalence conjecture.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Poincaré-sheaf isometry acts on the integral Lagrangian primitive cohomology $H^2_{\mathrm{lprim}}(X,\mathbb{Z})$ as multiplication by $\pm 1$; the proof establishes this by deforming a class to a very general point of the period domain where it is the unique integral Hodge class and then extending the sign to all classes through differences of large-negative-square vectors, and that deformation step is where the argument is most delicate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every projective hyperkähler manifold of OG10-type satisfies the Lefschetz standard conjecture (Theorem 6.1).
  • Any two birational projective hyperkähler manifolds of OG10-type have equivalent bounded derived categories (Theorem 6.9).
  • For the very good cubic fourfolds arising in the construction, the Fano varieties of lines carry a twisted derived equivalence $D^b(F_1(C_X), \delta_X) \simeq D^b(F_1(C_Z), \delta_Z)$ (Theorem 6.8).
  • The same convolution produces new twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundles on products of K3^[n]-type hyperkähler manifolds, beyond the previously known hyperholomorphic sheaf construction (Theorem 1.3).
  • The isometry induced on Lagrangian primitive cohomology is of $k$-cyclic type and yields explicit B-field identities (Lemma 6.2, Corollary 6.5), which are the computational backbone of the derived-equivalence proof.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the deformation argument behind Proposition 4.5 is sound, the same two-conjecture pipeline should work for any hyperkähler deformation type admitting transverse Lagrangian fibrations whose fibers are compactified abelian schemes; O'Grady 6-type would be the natural next case once analogues of the Poincaré-sheaf and Tate–Shafarevich inputs exist.
  • The explicit dependence of the B-fields on the integer $k$ suggests a countable family of twisted derived equivalences between OG10 manifolds, with $k$ as a parameter; testing whether different $k$ give genuinely different Brauer classes would isolate the new content of the construction.
  • The paper leaves open whether its bundle $Q$ is deformation equivalent to the previously known hyperholomorphic bundle on K3^[n] products along diagonal twistor lines; comparing Chern characters and B-fields on the K3^[n] side would settle that unification question.
  • One could push the same kernel-based reasoning toward an algebraicity statement for rational Hodge isometries of OG10-type manifolds, by analogy with the K3^[n]-type result, since the construction produces algebraic kernels realizing the isometries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a new construction of twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundles on products of hyperkähler manifolds of K3[n]- and OG10-type, following and generalizing work of Kapustka–Kapustka. Given a hyperkähler manifold Y admitting two transverse Lagrangian fibrations that are Tate–Shafarevich twists of compactified abelian fibrations, the authors form the convolution Q of two twisted Poincaré sheaves and claim in Theorem 5.8 that Q is a twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundle on X × Z. Deforming Q along generic twistor paths yields twisted derived equivalences for arbitrary manifolds of the same deformation type. The two advertised applications are the Lefschetz standard conjecture for OG10-type hyperkähler manifolds (Theorem 6.1) and the D-equivalence conjecture for birational projective OG10-type hyperkähler manifolds (Theorem 6.9). The proof of Theorem 6.9 transports a rational B-field to X and asserts that the transported fractional class represents the trivial Brauer class, thereby removing the twist.

Significance. If the main theorems were established, they would be substantial: the D-equivalence conjecture for OG10-type hyperkähler manifolds is a major open problem, and a proof of the Lefschetz standard conjecture for all OG10-type manifolds would significantly extend known results. The paper is clearly organized, engages seriously with recent work of Arinkin, Bottini, Yu, Dutta–Mattei–Shinder, and Markman, and the construction of Q in Theorem 5.8 is an interesting and potentially reusable technique. The cohomological bookkeeping via LLV-equivariant isometries and the explicit B-field computations are also valuable. However, the proof of the headline D-equivalence theorem contains a load-bearing error in its final step: the transported B-field is claimed to be Brauer-trivial when, under the paper's own definition, it is not. As written, Theorem 6.9 is not proved, and the advertised application to D-equivalence is therefore unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.3, proof of Theorem 6.9, final paragraph] The assertion that (D+gv)/g ∈ Pic(X)_Q + H^2(X,Z) represents the trivial Brauer class is false under the paper's own definition of the Brauer class of a B-field (Proposition 2.19 and Corollary 2.20). By Lemma 6.13, the isotropic vector D+gv has divisibility one, so there is an integral class μ_1' with (D+gv, μ_1') = 1. Therefore ((D+gv)/g, μ_1') = 1/g, which is nonzero in H^2(X,Q/Z) for g > 1. The proof requires g to be large (Proposition 5.3), so this is not a removable edge case. Since 3η_X is integral and contributes zero to the Brauer class, the parallel transported B-field has nontrivial Brauer class. Consequently the chain of untwisted equivalences D^b(X) ≃ D^b(Z'', α_{Z''}) ≃ D^b(X') is not justified, and Theorem 6.9 is not proved.
  2. [§5.1, Theorem 5.8] The step from fiberwise stability to global stability is asserted in one sentence: 'This is enough to deduce that Q is μ_H-stable.' Slope stability of the restrictions Q|_{x×Z} and Q|_{X×z} with respect to suitable polarizations does not by itself imply slope stability of Q with respect to pr_1^*H_X + pr_2^*H_Z; a proof or a precise reference for this twisted analogue is needed. Since Theorem 2.17, Corollary 5.9, and all subsequent applications rely on the global stability of Q, this is a load-bearing gap in the main construction as written.
  3. [§4, Proposition 4.5 and Remark 4.8] The proof that the Poincaré-sheaf isometry acts by ±1 on the integral Lagrangian primitive cohomology H^2_lprim(X,Z) is not fully spelled out. For an arbitrary primitive class λ of large negative square, one must show that there is a deformation of the Beauville–Mukai or LSV system in which λ (or, in the sign-comparison step, a primitive linear combination pλ1+qλ2) is the unique integral Hodge class in H^2_lprim, while the relevant Poincaré sheaf exists and the period stays in the allowed locus. The current text asserts this rather than proving it, and the subsequent sign-agreement argument needs a Hodge-theoretic justification. This matters because Lemma 6.2 and Corollary 6.5, and hence the k-cyclic isometry used in Section 6, depend on this integrality and sign.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Lemma 4.6, proof] There are two apparent typos in the proof: the saturation should be in the lattice Λ rather than in 'M', and the formula for v_2 should presumably read (p+ka)w_1 + a w_2 rather than (p+ka)v_1 + a v_2. As written, the proof is confusing even though the intended construction is recognizable.
  2. [Proposition 6.4, displayed computation] The displayed computation in the proof of the second diagram has an apparent sign inconsistency: the term (-akϵμ_1 + ϵv_2, B'_Z)f is claimed to equal af, but the signs in the preceding line suggest the opposite. Please verify the calculation, since it feeds directly into Corollary 6.5.
  3. [§6.3, proof of Theorem 6.9] The proof refers to 'Lemma 6.14 below' before the lemma is stated; this is acceptable stylistically but should be reordered or cross-referenced for readability. More importantly, the final paragraph should be rewritten in light of the Brauer-class issue above.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected: the derivation chain is self-contained, with external results used as independent inputs; the noted final-step objection is a correctness concern, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central construction, Theorem 5.8, builds the twisted hyperholomorphic bundle Q as a convolution of twisted Poincaré sheaves whose existence is taken from external work of Arinkin, Bottini, and Yu, and whose deformation properties come from Markman's and Taelman's independently established hyperholomorphic and LLV theories. The applications, Theorem 6.1 and Theorem 6.9, do not assume the Lefschetz standard conjecture or the D-equivalence conjecture as inputs; they follow from the constructed Q together with Markman's criterion and the strategy of Maulik–Shen–Yin–Zhang. There are no load-bearing self-citations by the authors of this paper, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The skeptical concern about Theorem 6.9, namely that the transported B-field (D+gv)/g may define a nonzero Brauer class because it pairs to 1/g with an integral class, is a possible mathematical gap in the proof, not a circularity: the paper is not assuming the conclusion it purports to prove. Accordingly, no circular step is exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a large library of established results in hyperkähler geometry, including global Torelli, MBM theory, LLV Lie algebras, and SYZ for these deformation types, and on several recent unreviewed preprints for the existence and LLV-equivariance of twisted Poincaré equivalences. The only hand-chosen scale is the integer k, which must be taken large enough; no numbers are fitted to data.

free parameters (1)
  • k = integer greater than maximal MBM bound N; later set equal to g in Theorem 6.9
    Integer scale in Construction 5.1 that controls the intersection number of the two Lagrangian fibrations and guarantees the absence of MBM classes. It is chosen by hand to be large enough, not fitted to data.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The fibers of the relevant compactified abelian fibrations are integral: all curves in the linear system |L| are integral for Beauville-Mukai systems, and the cubic fourfold is very good, meaning it contains no plane, no cubic scroll, and no hyperplane section with a corank 3 singularity.
    Needed for the existence of Cohen-Macaulay Poincaré sheaves and integral fibers; stated in Section 2.2 and used in Theorem 2.9 and Construction 5.1.
  • domain assumption Twisted Poincaré equivalences exist for Tate-Shafarevich twists of these fibrations and are LLV-equivariant, following Bottini [Bot25, Theorem 3.3 and Proposition 3.9] and Yu [Yu26, Theorem 6.7].
    These are central external inputs, currently preprints, and Corollary 2.11 derives LLV-equivariance from them. The whole construction of Q depends on these equivalences.
  • standard math The SYZ conjecture holds for K3^[n]- and OG10-type hyperkähler manifolds, so every nef isotropic class is the pullback of O(1) from a Lagrangian fibration, by [Mat17] and [MO22, Theorem 2.2].
    Used in Proposition 5.3 to turn the nef classes η1 and η2 into Lagrangian fibrations.
  • standard math Verbitsky's global Torelli theorem and the birational Torelli theorem for OG10-type manifolds, including the monodromy and parallel transport results of Onorati [Ono22] and Markman [Mar11].
    Used throughout Section 3 and Section 6 to identify periods, to realize Hodge isometries as parallel transports, and to reduce birational questions to chamber structures.
  • standard math The MBM wall-and-chamber description of the Kähler cone and the uniform bound N on MBM class squares, from [AV15, Theorem 6.2] and [AV20, Theorem 3.17].
    Used in Proposition 5.3 to show that manifolds with Picard lattice U(k) and k > N have no MBM classes, hence Kah(Y) = Pos(Y).
  • standard math Eichler's criterion for isometries of Λ_OG10 and the arithmetic of the discriminant group Z/3, as used in Lemmas 6.11, 6.12, and 6.13.
    Used to construct parallel transport isometries sending one isotropic divisibility-one vector to another, which is essential in the proof of Theorem 6.9.
  • domain assumption The deformation argument in Proposition 4.5 assumes that Noether-Lefschetz loci with a unique Hodge class in H^2_lprim exist and that the Poincaré sheaf exists on the corresponding family, avoiding the divisors C2, C6, C8, and C12 for cubic fourfolds.
    The proof of Proposition 4.5 uses deformation to very general points in the period domain; the paper notes in Remark 4.8 which divisors must be avoided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equivalences via twisted hyperholomorphic sheaves from transverse Lagrangian fibrations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OUCEDLE

@misc{pith2026260813403,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equivalences via twisted hyperholomorphic sheaves from transverse Lagrangian fibrations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OUCEDLE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13403}
}
abstract

Following ideas of Kapustka-Kapustka, we use Lagrangian fibrations to construct twisted hyperholomorphic sheaves on products of hyperk\"ahler manifolds of K3$^{[n]}$- and OG10-type. As applications, we prove the Lefschetz standard conjecture and the D-equivalence conjecture for hyperk\"ahler manifolds of OG10-type.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A twisted derived category of hyper-K\"ahler varieties of K3^

    Ruxuan Zhang , year=. A twisted derived category of hyper-K\"ahler varieties of K3^. 2502.02143 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Beckmann, Thorsten , TITLE =. Compos. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/S0010437X22007849 , URL =

    doi:10.1112/s0010437x22007849 2023

  3. [3]

    2024 , school=

    Brauer groups and derived equivalence for Lagrangian fibrations , author=. 2024 , school=

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    2026 , eprint=

    Twisted Arinkin transforms and derived categories of moduli spaces on Kuznetsov components , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    Bottini, Alessio , TITLE =. Compos. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/S0010437X24007528 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1112/s0010437x24007528 2024

  6. [6]

    2025 , eprint=

    O'Grady's tenfolds from stable bundles on hyper-K\"ahler fourfolds , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    van Geemen, Bert , TITLE =. Adv. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2005 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2004.10.004 , URL =

    doi:10.1016/j.aim.2004.10.004 2005

  8. [8]

    Bayer, Arend and Macr\`i, Emanuele , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-014-0501-8 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/s00222-014-0501-8 2014

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    2025 , eprint=

    Constructions of derived equivalent hyper-K\"ahler fourfolds , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  2. [10]

    Markman, Eyal , TITLE =. Kyoto J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/21562261-2024-0002 , URL =

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    Markman, Eyal , TITLE =. Compos. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/S0010437X24007048 , URL =

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    The global moduli theory of symplectic varieties , title =

    Benjamin Bakker and Christian Lehn , pages =. The global moduli theory of symplectic varieties , title =. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) , doi =. 2022 , lastchecked =

    2022

  5. [13]

    Markman, Eyal , TITLE =. J. Algebraic Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/jag/750 , URL =

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    , TITLE =

    Looijenga, Eduard and Lunts, Valery A. , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s002220050166 , URL =

    1997 doi

  7. [15]

    1995 , PAGES =

    Verbitsky, Mikhail , TITLE =. 1995 , PAGES =

    1995

  8. [16]

    Taelman, Lenny , TITLE =. Geom. Topol. , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/gt.2023.27.2649 , URL =

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    2025 , eprint=

    Twists of intermediate Jacobian fibrations , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  10. [18]

    2026 , eprint=

    Autoduality of compactified Pryms for \'etale double covers of curves with planar singularities , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  11. [19]

    Sacc\`a, Giulia , TITLE =. Geom. Topol. , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/gt.2023.27.1479 , URL =

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Buskin, Nikolay , TITLE =. J. Reine Angew. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2019 , PAGES =. doi:10.1515/crelle-2017-0027 , URL =

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Mongardi, Giovanni and Onorati, Claudio , TITLE =. Math. Z. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00209-021-02966-6 , URL =

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    Onorati, Claudio , TITLE =. J. Algebraic Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/jag/802 , URL =

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Rapagnetta, Antonio , TITLE =. Math. Ann. , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00208-007-0139-6 , URL =

    2008 doi

  16. [24]

    Ast\'erisque , FJOURNAL =

    Huybrechts, Daniel , TITLE =. Ast\'erisque , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , PAGES =

    2012

  17. [25]

    Complex and differential geometry , SERIES =

    Markman, Eyal , TITLE =. Complex and differential geometry , SERIES =. 2011 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20300-8\_15 , URL =

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    Algebraic and complex geometry , SERIES =

    Markman, Eyal , TITLE =. Algebraic and complex geometry , SERIES =. 2014 , ISBN =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05404-9\_10 , URL =

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    Amerik, Ekaterina and Verbitsky, Misha , TITLE =. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , FJOURNAL =. 2015 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnv133 , URL =

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    Amerik, Ekaterina and Verbitsky, Misha , TITLE =. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnx319 , URL =

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    Fujiki, Akira , TITLE =. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 1981 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2977/prims/1195185272 , URL =

    1981

  22. [30]

    Huybrechts, Daniel , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2003 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-002-0280-5 , URL =

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    Dutta, Yajnaseni and Marquand, Lisa , TITLE =. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2026 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/proc/17417 , URL =

    2026 doi

  24. [32]

    Abasheva, Anna and Rogov, Vasily , TITLE =. Math. Z. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00209-025-03776-w , URL =

    2025 doi

  25. [33]

    2025 , eprint=

    Shafarevich-Tate groups of holomorphic Lagrangian fibrations II , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  26. [34]

    2025 , eprint=

    Hermitian-symplectic and Kahler structures on degenerate twistor deformations , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  27. [35]

    Huybrechts, Daniel and Stellari, Paolo , TITLE =. Math. Ann. , FJOURNAL =. 2005 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00208-005-0662-2 , URL =

    2005 doi

  28. [36]

    Selecta Math

    Bae, Younghan and Maulik, Davesh and Shen, Junliang and Yin, Qizheng , TITLE =. Selecta Math. (N.S.) , FJOURNAL =. 2026 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00029-026-01151-z , URL =

    2026 doi

  29. [37]

    , TITLE =

    O'Grady, Kieran G. , TITLE =. Algebr. Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.14231/ag-2022-001 , URL =

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    , TITLE =

    O'Grady, Kieran G. , TITLE =. Geom. Topol. , FJOURNAL =. 2026 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/gt.2026.30.203 , URL =

    2026 doi

  31. [39]

    Ancona, Giuseppe and Cavicchi, Mattia and Laterveer, Robert and Sacc\`a, Giulia , TITLE =. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/jlms.70133 , URL =

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    , TITLE =

    O'Grady, Kieran G. , TITLE =. J. Algebraic Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =

    1997

  33. [41]

    Shinder, Evgeny and Zhang, Ziyu , TITLE =. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/blms.12339 , URL =

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    2023 , ISBN =

    Huybrechts, Daniel , TITLE =. 2023 , ISBN =

    2023

  35. [43]

    Beauville, Arnaud and Donagi, Ron , TITLE =. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\'er. I Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1985 , NUMBER =

    1985

  36. [44]

    Maulik, Davesh and Shen, Junliang and Yin, Qizheng and Zhang, Ruxuan , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-025-01339-8 , URL =

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    Gritsenko, Valery and Hulek, Klaus and Sankaran, Gregory , TITLE =. J. Algebra , FJOURNAL =. 2009 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.01.037 , URL =

    2009 doi

  38. [46]

    1952 , PAGES =

    Eichler, Martin , TITLE =. 1952 , PAGES =

    1952

  39. [47]

    Acta Math

    Laza, Radu and Sacc\`a, Giulia and Voisin, Claire , TITLE =. Acta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2017 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4310/ACTA.2017.v218.n1.a2 , URL =

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    Higher dimensional algebraic geometry---in honour of

    Matsushita, Daisuke , TITLE =. Higher dimensional algebraic geometry---in honour of. 2017 , ISBN =. doi:10.2969/aspm/07410291 , URL =

    2017

  41. [49]

    Hwang, Jun-Muk and Nagai, Yasunari , TITLE =. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , FJOURNAL =. 2008 , NUMBER =. doi:10.5802/aif.2360 , URL =

    2008 doi

  42. [50]

    Kawamata, Yujiro , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2002 , NUMBER =

    2002

  43. [51]

    1995 , eprint=

    Semiorthogonal decomposition for algebraic varieties , author=. 1995 , eprint=

    1995

  44. [52]

    Remarks on degenerations of hyper-

    Koll\'. Remarks on degenerations of hyper-. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.5802/aif.3228 , URL =

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    Duke Math

    Verbitsky, Misha , TITLE =. Duke Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2013 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/00127094-2382680 , URL =

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    Huybrechts, Daniel , TITLE =. J. Differential Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1997 , NUMBER =

    1997

  47. [55]

    2026 , eprint=

    Cubic fourfolds containing highly singular hyperplane sections , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  48. [56]

    Verbitsky, Mikhail , TITLE =. J. Algebraic Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 1996 , NUMBER =

    1996

  49. [57]

    Charles, Fran cois and Markman, Eyal , TITLE =. Compos. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2013 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1112/S0010437X12000607 , URL =

    2013 doi

  50. [58]

    Arinkin, Dima , TITLE =. J. Algebraic Geom. , FJOURNAL =. 2013 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/S1056-3911-2012-00596-7 , URL =

    2013 doi

  51. [59]

    C ald araru, Andrei , TITLE =. Int. Math. Res. Not. , FJOURNAL =. 2002 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1155/S1073792802109093 , URL =

    2002 doi

  52. [60]

    Floccari, Salvatore and Fu, Lie and Zhang, Ziyu , TITLE =. Commun. Contemp. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1142/S0219199720500340 , URL =

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Huybrechts, Daniel , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s002220050280 , URL =

    1999 doi

  54. [62]

    , TITLE =

    Grothendieck, A. , TITLE =. Algebraic. 1969 , MRCLASS =

    1969

  55. [63]

    Huybrechts, Daniel , TITLE =. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.5802/afst.1741 , URL =

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.