Can a gamma-ray dim radio blazar produce a 200-PeV neutrino? The case of PMN J0606$-$0724 and KM3-230213A

Polina Kivokurtseva; Sergey Troitsky

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 62 references

Can a gamma-ray dim radio blazar produce a 200-PeV neutrino? The case of PMN J0606$-$0724 and KM3-230213A

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the 200-PeV neutrino KM3-230213A could plausibly come from the gamma-ray-dim radio blazar PMN J0606-0724, produced by protons interacting with soft photons in the blazar's compact radio core during a flare.

desk verdict A transparent plausibility study for the KM3NeT event; the central claim holds up conditionally, but the proton acceleration ceiling is asserted rather than demonstrated, and the untested MeV prediction is a missed opportunity. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.10352 v1 pith:6OWJFKFE submitted 2025-09-12 astro-ph.HE

Polina Kivokurtseva , Sergey Troitsky This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HE

keywords neutrinoastronomyblazarsKM3-230213Aphotohadronicinteractionsmillimeterradiocoregamma-raydimsourcesultra-high-energyneutrinosactivegalacticnuclei

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a blazar that has never been seen in gamma rays could still be responsible for the most energetic neutrino ever recorded, KM3-230213A. Using a model in which protons are accelerated in the 'millimeter radio core'—a compact standing shock near the base of the jet—the authors show that photohadronic interactions with the source's own soft photons can produce a roughly 200-PeV neutrino without producing observable high-energy gamma rays: those gamma rays are absorbed by pair production and cascade down to MeV energies, keeping the source dim for GeV telescopes. The required proton power comes out close to the source's observed photon luminosity and to the Eddington luminosity of a bright quasar, and the parameter values needed to reproduce the multiwavelength spectrum are reasonable. The paper further shows that a population of roughly 600 similar radio-flaring blazars would contribute to the diffuse ultra-high-energy neutrino flux at a level consistent with the non-detection of such events by other neutrino telescopes.

What carries the argument

The machinery is photohadronic neutrino production at the Delta-resonance in a 'millimeter radio core'—a stationary collimation shock in the relativistic jet, modeled as a cylinder about 1.5 pc long and 0.6 pc in radius. The key identity is the resonance condition E'_p E'_gamma roughly equal to m_Delta^2, which fixes the proton energy at about 20 times the neutrino energy and selects target photons of roughly 0.07–0.6 eV observed energy; combined with the measured multiwavelength spectrum and the relativistic Doppler factor, it sets the p-gamma optical depth and hence the fraction of protons that convert to neutrinos. A second, equally important element is the gamma-gamma opacity: the same s

What would settle it

Check archival optical and near-infrared photometry of PMN J0606-0724 around MJD 59988, the neutrino arrival time, to see whether the target-photon density actually increased by about a factor of three; if it did not rise while the radio flare did, the p-gamma optical depth stays low and the inferred proton luminosity exceeds plausible bounds. Alternatively, catching the source in a similar flare with a GeV gamma-ray detection would contradict the predicted pair-production opacity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a proof of capability: the 220-PeV neutrino detected by KM3NeT could have been produced in PMN J0606-0724, not in spite of the source being gamma-ray dim but because of conditions that hide gamma rays. In the proposed picture, protons accelerated to about 10^19 eV in the parsec-scale millimeter core interact with the blazar's soft synchrotron photons at the Delta-resonance; charged pions yield neutrinos with about one-twentieth of the proton energy, while neutral pions produce gamma rays that are immediately absorbed by the same photon field through electron-positron pair production. The resulting electromagnetic cascade re-emits the energy in the MeV band, below Fermi-L

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the radio flare raised the entire quiescent photon field, including the optical and infrared target photons, by the same factor of three seen in radio; if those target photons did not rise with the flare, the neutrino-production efficiency would stay at its quiescent level and the required proton power would become implausibly large relative to the source's luminosity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the association is right, the KM3-230213A event no longer requires an exotic source: an ordinary flaring radio blazar with a hidden core can accelerate protons to about 10^19 eV.
Gamma-ray non-detection becomes a diagnostic rather than a disqualifier for neutrino-emitting blazars; radio flares, not GeV flares, are the tracers to watch.
The model predicts that the same source should be bright in the MeV band during such flares, because the absorbed gamma rays cascade down to MeV energies.
The population estimate implies that a handful of similar sources, flaring with a duty cycle of about one flare per 17 years, produce a diffuse flux consistent with current upper limits, so future neutrino detectors can constrain the abundance and duty cycle of these hidden cores.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If this mechanism operates broadly, radio-selected, gamma-ray-quiet blazars could be a hidden reservoir of ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray acceleration, with a neutrino output that rivals gamma-ray-bright blazars.
The same pair-production argument suggests that other gamma-ray-dim transients, not only blazars, could hide neutrino production; radio-monitoring-triggered searches might find more such events.
A decisive test would be to catch a similar radio flare with simultaneous optical, infrared, and MeV observations: a rise in target photons without a GeV counterpart would support the model, while a GeV detection would require revising the opacity estimate.
The numerical calculation uses the quiescent spectrum scaled by a factor of three; if future data show the flare is spectrally harder or softer, the allowed parameter space—Doppler factor, proton luminosity—will shift, and the ratio of proton power to Eddington luminosity is the quantity to track.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this paper does what it says on the tin—it asks whether a gamma-ray dim blazar could have produced the 200-PeV KM3NeT event, and answers with a qualified yes. The qualification matters.

What's new: the specific application of the authors' mm-core neutrino production model (Kalashev, Kivokurtseva, Troitsky 2023) to PMN J0606-0724, with an AM3 leptohadronic SED fit and a back-of-envelope population consistency check. The SED fit is a real effort—they pull together radio to X-ray data, handle extinction, and use the public AM3 code. The gamma-ray opacity argument—that cascades move the power to MeV energies, so Fermi non-detection is expected—is physically reasonable and is the sharpest part of the paper.

The soft spots are where I'd want work before publication. First, the acceleration ceiling. The paper needs protons at E'_p ~ 2e18 eV (for delta_c=5). The Hillas and synchrotron-loss inequalities are given, but the interaction-loss constraint is waved through with 'a bit more tricky' and a citation to Sotirov's Fig. 1, described as 'marginally allow(ing)'. Then the AM3 calculation just injects protons with Emax = 2e18 eV. That is tuning, not demonstration. If the true ceiling is below that, the capability claim dies. The authors say they will return to the point; they don't. This is load-bearing.

Second, the MeV prediction. Their numbers imply L_gamma1 ~ several x 10^46 erg/s, well above the bolometric luminosity, dumped into the MeV band. They note the source is expected to be bright in MeV gamma rays, but they never confront this with any MeV survey data (COMPTEL, INTEGRAL, or even Fermi GBM upper limits). That's a testable prediction sitting right there, and leaving it on the table weakens the paper.

Third, the population check is marginal: about 600 cataloged non-Fermi blazars vs a 68% upper limit around 530. That's consistent at roughly the 1-sigma level, which is fine, but it is not a strong constraint. The neutrino flux estimate itself is necessarily crude—one event, assumed N=1, effective area scalings.

None of this is fatal for a plausibility study. The paper is honest about the flare SED being scaled by a factor of three, and it doesn't overclaim association. The claim is 'could be produced,' and with the parameters they choose, it could. But the two missing pieces—a quantitative check on the acceleration ceiling and a confrontation of the MeV prediction with data—are what would take this from an interesting exercise to a compelling case. A good referee should push on exactly those.

Who is this for? Anyone working on the KM3NeT event or on hidden-core blazar neutrino models. It deserves serious peer review, not a desk rejection.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper addresses the origin of KM3-230213A, the ultra-high-energy neutrino candidate detected by KM3NeT. It focuses on PMN J0606−0724, a radio blazar that was flaring at the time of the event and lies within the event's error region. The authors propose that the neutrino is produced by pγ interactions in the millimeter radio core of the jet, with target photons supplied by the quiescent SED scaled up by a factor of three. Using analytic estimates and the open-source AM3 code, they argue that protons can reach the required energy, that the source stays gamma-ray dim because of pair cascades, and that the integrated contribution of a population of similar flaring sources is consistent with non-detection by other neutrino telescopes. The claim is explicitly one of capability ('could be produced'), not confirmed association.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a viable hadronic interpretation of the most energetic neutrino event observed so far, with a concrete mechanism explaining why a flaring blazar can be bright in radio yet invisible in GeV gamma rays. The work uses publicly available multiwavelength data and an open-source simulation code, and it is transparent about many of its assumptions. It also makes a falsifiable prediction: the source should be bright in MeV gamma rays. The main weaknesses are that the proton acceleration ceiling is not quantitatively demonstrated, the all-band scaling of the flare SED is arbitrary, and the diffuse-flux population check is partly circular and contains an internal numerical tension. These issues directly affect the capability claim and the abstract's consistency statement.

major comments (3)

[§3.2.1, Table 1] The central claim depends on protons reaching E'_p ≈ 2×10^18 eV for δ_c=5. Section 3.2.1 provides only the Hillas and synchrotron-loss inequalities; the interaction-loss check is deferred to Ref. [64] with 'marginally allow' and 'we will return to this point', but no such quantitative return appears in §3.2.2 or §3.3. The AM3 run (Table 1) injects E'_p,max = 2×10^18 eV, exactly the required value, so it verifies propagation and radiation but not acceleration. Without a quantitative interaction-loss ceiling for this source, or explicit conditionalization of the conclusion, the capability claim is not self-contained.
[§3.3] The quiescent SED is scaled by a factor of three 'in all bands' as a simplification. The target photon density entering τ_pγ (Eq. 3.3) and the γγ opacity (Sec. 3.2.4) is taken from this scaled SED. If the optical/IR target photons did not participate in the radio flare, τ_pγ would be smaller by roughly the inverse of the scaling, and the required proton power (Sec. 3.2.3) would be correspondingly larger. Since radio is the only well-measured flare band, this assumption is load-bearing; its impact should be quantified or at least varied.
[§4] The diffuse-flux comparison is not an independent prediction: Fν from Eq. (2.1) is derived from the same KM3NeT event, so Eq. (4.1) is a consistency constraint rather than an independent test. More importantly, the text states Ns ~ 600 comparable sources, while the derived constraint is Ns ≲ 220 (with an upper value of 530). Using the stated central values gives F_diff about 2.7 times above the limit (4.2) if all ~600 sources flare with the same duty cycle. Thus the abstract's 'matches non-observation' overstates the consistency; the section should address this tension or soften the claim.

minor comments (4)

[§1] Typo: 'siginificantly' should be 'significantly'.
[§3.2.2 vs Table 1] The benchmark geometry in §3.2.2 is r' = 0.2 pc, l' = 1.2 pc, while Table 1 uses r' = 0.6 pc, l' = 1.5 pc. The change in (6r'/l')^{2/3} should be propagated or explicitly noted as an order-of-magnitude choice.
[Abstract, §3.2.3] The abstract states that the required proton power is 'of order of the source's photon luminosity', but the numbers in §3.2.3 give L_p ≈ 4.5×10^47 erg/s versus L_bol ≈ 1.5×10^45 erg/s, a factor of ~300. The statement would be more accurate if referred to the Eddington luminosity of a ~10^9 M_sun black hole.
[§4] The diffuse flux upper limit (4.2) is quoted after multiplication by three flavors. Please clarify whether Fν in Eq. (2.1) is per flavor or summed over flavors, to avoid ambiguity in the population estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the neutrino energy is a requested input, not a predicted output, and the core plausibility argument is anchored by independent SED and gamma-opacity checks.

full rationale

The paper frames a capability question: could the known 200-PeV event be produced in PMN J0606−0724? The required proton energy E'_p is obtained from the observed neutrino energy via the standard Δ-resonance relation (Sec. 3.2.1), and the AM3 calculation (Table 1) adopts E'_p,max = 2×10^18 eV, which equals 20 E_ν(1+z)/δ_c for δ_c=5. Thus the model's neutrino spectrum at ~200 PeV is a kinematic restatement of the input, not an independent prediction. This is, however, an openly stated input rather than a hidden fit: the paper never claims to predict the neutrino energy from first principles. The independent content lies elsewhere: the observed broadband SED supplies target photons at the required energy (Sec. 3.2.2); the same SED makes the source optically thick to the accompanying gamma rays, explaining the Fermi-LAT non-detection (Sec. 3.2.4); and the population check (Sec. 4) compares with an external diffuse upper limit. The proton-acceleration ceiling is supported only by the Hillas/synchrotron necessary conditions and an external citation (Ref. [64]) with no quantitative re-derivation; this is a robustness/correctness gap, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs. [17,18]) supply the radio-core model and geometry, but they are prior model choices, not imported uniqueness theorems. Hence no derivation step reduces to its own input; score 2 reflects the load-bearing but non-circular use of the authors' earlier model.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a tightly parameterized model: the Doppler factor, flare duration, core size, magnetic field, and maximum proton energy are all free parameters chosen within broad plausibility bands, and several are tuned to reproduce the observed SED and neutrino energy. The only strong empirical inputs are the observed SED and the single neutrino event; the theoretical framework comes from the authors' earlier work (Ref [18]). No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (9)

Doppler factor of the radio core, delta_c = 2.8 (analytical benchmark), 5 (numerical model)
Chosen within the expected 2-5 range for mm cores (Ref [18]); not measured for this source. It strongly controls the pγ optical depth (~delta^-5.4) and the required proton power (~delta^-4).
Effective flare duration, Delta t = 90 days (pm 45 days)
Free parameter; the neutrino flux F_nu scales as 1/Delta t, so the inferred luminosities are set by this choice.
Core radius and length (r', l') = r'=0.6 pc, l'=1.5 pc (numerical); r'=0.2 pc, l'=1.2 pc (estimates)
Taken from typical mm-core scales in Ref [18]; no direct measurement for PMN J0606-0724.
Magnetic field B' = 0.05 G (numerical)
Within the allowed range from acceleration limits (0.05/delta_c < B' < 3.8 sqrt(delta_c) G); chosen to match the SED.
Maximum proton energy E'_p,max = 2e18 eV
Tuned to produce a neutrino at E_nu ~ E'_p/20 ~ 2.2e17 eV, the central energy of KM3-230213A.
Proton power L'_p = 5e47 erg/s (numerical); ~4.5e47 erg/s (analytical benchmark)
Chosen to match the neutrino flux inferred from the single event; far above the bolometric luminosity.
Electron parameters (spectral index, E_max, power) = index 1.8, E_max 1e10 eV, L'_e 5e44 erg/s
Adopted to reproduce the observed synchrotron SED.
Flare SED scaling factor = 3
Ad hoc: all bands are scaled by the radio enhancement despite only the radio being measured.
Target photon power-law parameters F_0, spectral index = F_0 = 2.9e-13 erg/cm2/s at E_0=0.41 eV; index -0.2
Fitted to the quiescent SED and extrapolated to optical/IR target photon energies.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The KM3-230213A event and the radio flare of PMN J0606-0724 are physically associated (chance coincidence 2.6e-3).
Ref [13] reports the coincidence probability; the paper relies on this for the flux estimate. Other candidate sources are mentioned.
domain assumption The neutrino production site is a stationary 'millimeter radio core' with the geometry and photon density relation of Ref [18].
Eq. (3.1) is imported from the authors' prior model; not re-derived or independently validated for this source.
domain assumption Target photons are isotropic in the core rest frame.
Used in the pγ and γγ calculations (Sec. 3.2.2, 3.2.4).
ad hoc to paper The quiescent SED scaled by a factor 3 represents the flaring SED in all bands.
Sec. 3.3 states this is a simplification due to lack of flare-period data.
domain assumption IceCube and Baikal-GVD would have reported any comparable events.
Footnote 2: 'We assume that corresponding events, if any, would have been reported.' Without this, the flux estimate changes.
domain assumption The population of similar sources has identical neutrino luminosity and duty cycle derived from this one source.
Sec. 4: 'Assuming identical sources'.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can a gamma-ray dim radio blazar produce a 200-PeV neutrino? The case of PMN J0606$-$0724 and KM3-230213A." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OWJFKFE

@misc{pith2026250910352,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can a gamma-ray dim radio blazar produce a 200-PeV neutrino? The case of PMN J0606$-$0724 and KM3-230213A},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OWJFKFE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.10352}
}

abstract

An extremely energetic muon has been recently detected by the Cubic Kilometre Neutrino Telescope (KM3NeT), indicating the observation of a neutrino with the estimated energy of $\left( 2.2^{+5.7}_{-1.0} \right)\times 10^{17}$~eV. Radio blazar PMN~J0606$-$0724, not detected in gamma rays, is located within the reported error region of the neutrino arrival direction, and was flaring at the time of the event. Here we demonstrate that the neutrino could be produced in a photohadronic interaction in its radio core. The necessary proton power is of order of the source's photon luminosity, and protons can be accelerated to the required energies in the core, while high-energy gamma rays cannot leave the source because of intense production of electron-positron pairs. Expected contribution of the population of similar flaring sources matches non-observation of energetic events by other neutrino telescopes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 50 linked inside Pith

[64]

Sotirov,General constraints on sources of high-energy cosmic rays from interaction losses, Phys

S. Sotirov,General constraints on sources of high-energy cosmic rays from interaction losses, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123018 [2212.03483]

arXiv 2023
[6]

S.W. Li, P. Machado, D. Naredo-Tuero and T. Schwemberger,Clash of the Titans: ultra-high energy KM3NeT event versus IceCube data,2502.04508. [7]IceCube, Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, AGILE, ASAS-SN, HA WC, H.E.S.S., INTEGRAL, Kanata, Kiso, Kapteyn, Liverpool Telescope, Subaru, Swift NuSTAR, VERITAS, VLA/17B-403collaboration,Multimessenger observations of a flaring bl...

arXiv 2018
[8]

Kadler et al.,Coincidence of a high-fluence blazar outburst with a PeV-energy neutrino event,Nature Phys.12(2016) 807 [1602.02012]

M. Kadler et al.,Coincidence of a high-fluence blazar outburst with a PeV-energy neutrino event,Nature Phys.12(2016) 807 [1602.02012]

arXiv 2016
[9]

Plavin, Y.Y

A. Plavin, Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev and S. Troitsky,Observational Evidence for the Origin of High-energy Neutrinos in Parsec-scale Nuclei of Radio-bright Active Galaxies,Astrophys. J. 894(2020) 101 [2001.00930]

arXiv 2020
[10]

Plavin, Y.Y

A.V. Plavin, Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev and S.V. Troitsky,Growing evidence for high-energy neutrinos originating in radio blazars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.523(2023) 1799 [2211.09631]

arXiv 2023
[11]

Troitsky,Constraints on models of the origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,Usp

S.V. Troitsky,Constraints on models of the origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,Usp. Fiz. Nauk191(2021) 1333 [2112.09611]

arXiv 2021
[12]

Troitsky,Origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos: new results and prospects,Usp

S. Troitsky,Origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos: new results and prospects,Usp. Fiz. Nauk194(2024) 371 [2311.00281]. [13]KM3NeT, MessMapp Group, Fermi-LAT, Owens V alley Radio Obser v atory 40-m Telescope Group, SVOM, and otherscollaboration,Characterising Candidate Blazar Counterparts of the Ultra-High-Energy Event KM3-230213A,2502.08484

arXiv 2024
[14]

Richards et al.,Blazars in the Fermi Era: The OVRO 40-m Telescope Monitoring Program,Astrophys

J.L. Richards et al.,Blazars in the Fermi Era: The OVRO 40-m Telescope Monitoring Program,Astrophys. J. Suppl.194(2011) 29 [1011.3111]

arXiv 2011

Show all 62 references

[15]

Kovalev, Jr., N.A

Y.Y. Kovalev, Jr., N.A. Nizhelsky, Y.A. Kovalev, A.B. Berlin, G.V. Zhekanis, M.G. Mingaliev et al.,Survey of instantaneous 1-22 GHz spectra of 550 compact extragalactic objects with declinations from -30 deg to +43 deg,Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.139(1999) 545 [astro-ph/0408264]

1999 arXiv
[16]

Kovalev, Y.A

Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev, N.A. Nizhelsky and A.B. Bogdantsov,Broad-band Radio Spectra Variability of 550 AGN in 1997-2001,Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.19(2002) 83

1997
[17]

Plavin, Y.Y

A.V. Plavin, Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev and S.V. Troitsky,Directional Association of TeV to PeV Astrophysical Neutrinos with Radio Blazars,Astrophys. J.908(2021) 157 [2009.08914]

2021 arXiv
[18]

Kalashev, P

O.E. Kalashev, P. Kivokurtseva and S. Troitsky,Neutrino production in blazar radio cores, JCAP12(2023) 007 [2212.03151]

2023 arXiv
[19]

Healey, R.W

S.E. Healey, R.W. Romani, G. Cotter, P.F. Michelson, E.F. Schlafly, A.C.S. Readhead et al., CGRaBS: An All-Sky Survey of Gamma-Ray Blazar Candidates,Astrophys. J. Suppl.175 (2008) 97 [0709.1735]. [20]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2...

2008 arXiv
[21]

Sahakyan, V

N. Sahakyan, V. Vardanyan, P. Giommi, D. Bégué, D. Israyelyan, G. Harutyunyan et al., Markarian Multiwavelength Data Center (MMDC): A Tool for Retrieving and Modeling Multitemporal, Multiwavelength, and Multimessenger Data from Blazar Observations,Astron. J.168(2024) 289 [2410.01207]

2024 arXiv
[22]

Hurley-Walker, J.R

N. Hurley-Walker, J.R. Callingham, P.J. Hancock, T.M.O. Franzen, L. Hindson, A.D. Kapińska et al.,GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array (GLEAM) survey - I. A low-frequency extragalactic catalogue,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.464(2017) 1146 [1610.08318]

2017 arXiv
[23]

Intema, P

H.T. Intema, P. Jagannathan, K.P. Mooley and D.A. Frail,The GMRT 150 MHz all-sky radio survey. First alternative data release TGSS ADR1,Astron. Astrophys.598(2017) A78 [1603.04368]

2017 arXiv
[24]

C.L. Hale, D. McConnell, A.J.M. Thomson, E. Lenc, G.H. Heald, A.W. Hotan et al.,The Rapid ASKAP Continuum Survey Paper II: First Stokes I Source Catalogue Data Release, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.38(2021) e058 [2109.00956]. – 13 –

2021 arXiv
[25]

Condon, W.D

J.J. Condon, W.D. Cotton, E.W. Greisen, Q.F. Yin, R.A. Perley, G.B. Taylor et al.,The NRAO VLA Sky Survey,Astron. J.115(1998) 1693

1998
[26]

Gordon, M.M

Y.A. Gordon, M.M. Boyce, C.P. O’Dea, L. Rudnick, H. Andernach, A.N. Vantyghem et al.,A Quick Look at the 3 GHz Radio Sky. I. Source Statistics from the Very Large Array Sky Survey, Astrophys. J. Suppl.255(2021) 30 [2102.11753]

2021 arXiv
[27]

Wright, M.R

A.E. Wright, M.R. Griffith, B.F. Burke and R.D. Ekers,The Parkes-MIT-NRAO (PMN) Surveys. II. Source Catalog for the Southern Survey (-87 degrees -4pt.5 < delta < -37 degrees ), Astrophys. J. Suppl.91(1994) 111

1994
[28]

Healey, R.W

S.E. Healey, R.W. Romani, G.B. Taylor, E.M. Sadler, R. Ricci, T. Murphy et al.,CRATES: An All-Sky Survey of Flat-Spectrum Radio Sources,Astrophys. J. Suppl.171(2007) 61 [astro-ph/0702346]

2007 arXiv
[29]

Murphy, E.M

T. Murphy, E.M. Sadler, R.D. Ekers, M. Massardi, P.J. Hancock, E. Mahony et al.,The Australia Telescope 20 GHz Survey: the source catalogue,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.402 (2010) 2403 [0911.0002]

2010 arXiv
[30]

Bonato, E

M. Bonato, E. Liuzzo, D. Herranz, J. González-Nuevo, L. Bonavera, M. Tucci et al.,ALMA photometry of extragalactic radio sources,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.485(2019) 1188 [1901.08976]

2019 arXiv
[31]

Wright, P.R.M

E.L. Wright, P.R.M. Eisenhardt, A.K. Mainzer, M.E. Ressler, R.M. Cutri, T. Jarrett et al., The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance,Astron. J.140(2010) 1868 [1008.0031]

2010 arXiv
[32]

Mainzer, J

A. Mainzer, J. Bauer, R.M. Cutri, T. Grav, J. Masiero, R. Beck et al.,Initial Performance of the NEOWISE Reactivation Mission,Astrophys. J.792(2014) 30 [1406.6025]

2014 arXiv
[33]

Flewelling, E.A

H.A. Flewelling, E.A. Magnier, K.C. Chambers, J.N. Heasley, C. Holmberg, M.E. Huber et al., The Pan-STARRS1 Database and Data Products,Astrophys. J. Suppl.251(2020) 7 [1612.05243]

2020 arXiv
[34]

Brown, A

Gaia Collaboration, A.G.A. Brown, A. Vallenari, T. Prusti, J.H.J. de Bruijne, F. Mignard et al.,Gaia Data Release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties, Astron. Astrophys.595(2016) A2 [1609.04172]

2016 arXiv
[35]

Bellm, S.R

E.C. Bellm, S.R. Kulkarni, M.J. Graham, R. Dekany, R.M. Smith, R. Riddle et al.,The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific131(2019) 018002 [1902.01932]

2019 arXiv
[36]

Hart et al.,ASAS-SN Sky Patrol V2.0,2304.03791

K. Hart et al.,ASAS-SN Sky Patrol V2.0,2304.03791. [37]eROSITAcollaboration,The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey - First X-ray catalogues and data release of the western Galactic hemisphere,Astron. Astrophys.682(2024) A34 [2401.17274]

2024 arXiv
[38]

Stein, B

Y. Stein, B. Vollmer, T. Boch, G. Landais, P. Vannier, M. Brouty et al.,The SPECFIND V3.0 catalog of radio continuum cross-identifications and spectra: Reaching lower frequencies, Astron. Astrophys.655(2021) A17

2021
[39]

Rest, H.J

A. Rest, H.J. Weiland, C.W. Stubbs, S.J. Smartt, K.W. Smith, B. Stalder et al.,ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System,Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.130(2018) 064505

2018
[40]

Drake, S.G

A.J. Drake, S.G. Djorgovski, A. Mahabal, E. Beshore, S. Larson, M.J. Graham et al.,First Results from the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey,Astrophys. J.696(2009) 870 [0809.1394]. [41]KM3NeTcollaboration,On the Potential Galactic Origin of the Ultra-High-Energy Event KM3-230...

2009 arXiv
[42]

Amôres, R.M

E.B. Amôres, R.M. Jesus, A. Moitinho, V. Arsenijevic, R.S. Levenhagen, D.J. Marshall et al., – 14 – GALExtin: an alternative online tool to determine the interstellar extinction in the Milky Way, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508(2021) 1788 [2108.00561]

2021 arXiv
[43]

Amôres and J.R.D

E.B. Amôres and J.R.D. Lépine,Models for Interstellar Extinction in the Galaxy,Astron. J. 130(2005) 659

2005
[44]

Schlafly and D.P

E.F. Schlafly and D.P. Finkbeiner,Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD,Astrophys. J.737(2011) 103 [1012.4804]

2011 arXiv
[45]

Ben Bekhti, L

HI4PI Collaboration, N. Ben Bekhti, L. Flöer, R. Keller, J. Kerp, D. Lenz et al.,HI4PI: A full-sky H I survey based on EBHIS and GASS,Astron. Astrophys.594(2016) A116 [1610.06175]

2016 arXiv
[46]

Foight, T

D. Foight, T. Guver, F. Ozel and P. Slane,Probing X-ray Absorption and Optical Extinction in the Interstellar Medium Using Chandra Observations of Supernova Remnants,Astrophys. J. 826(2016) 66 [1504.07274]. [47]KM3NeTcollaboration,On the Potential Cosmogenic Origin of the Ultr...

2016 arXiv
[48]

Dzhatdoev,The blazar PKS 0605-085 as the origin of the KM3-230213A ultra high energy neutrino event,2502.11434

T.A. Dzhatdoev,The blazar PKS 0605-085 as the origin of the KM3-230213A ultra high energy neutrino event,2502.11434

arXiv
[49]

Neronov, F

A. Neronov, F. Oikonomou and D. Semikoz,KM3-230213A: An Ultra-High Energy Neutrino from a Year-Long Astrophysical Transient,2502.12986

arXiv
[50]

Berezinsky,Extraterrestrial neutrino sources and high energy neutrino astrophysics, in Proceedings of the Neutrino-77 Conference, Moscow, p

V. Berezinsky,Extraterrestrial neutrino sources and high energy neutrino astrophysics, in Proceedings of the Neutrino-77 Conference, Moscow, p. 177, 1977

1977
[51]

Berezinskii and V.L

V.S. Berezinskii and V.L. Ginzburg,On high-energy neutrino radiation of quasars and active galactic nuclei,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.194(1981) 3

1981
[52]

Stecker, C

F.W. Stecker, C. Done, M.H. Salamon and P. Sommers,High-energy neutrinos from active galactic nuclei,Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 2697

1991
[53]

Atoyan and C.D

A. Atoyan and C.D. Dermer,High-energy neutrinos from photomeson processes in blazars, Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 221102 [astro-ph/0108053]

2001 arXiv
[54]

Kalashev, D

O. Kalashev, D. Semikoz and I. Tkachev,Neutrinos in IceCube from active galactic nuclei,J. Exp. Theor. Phys.120(2015) 541 [1410.8124]. [55]IceCubecollaboration,Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert,Science361(2018) 1...

2015 arXiv
[57]

Suray and S

A. Suray and S. Troitsky,Neutrino flares of radio blazars observed from TeV to PeV,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527(2024) L26 [2306.16797]

2024 arXiv
[58]

Daly and A.P

R.A. Daly and A.P. Marscher,The Gasdynamics of Compact Relativistic Jets,Astrophys. J. 334(1988) 539. [59]Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration,Event Horizon Telescope imaging of the archetypal blazar 3C 279 at an extreme 20 microarcsecond resolution,Astron. Astrophys.640(2020)...

1988 arXiv
[61]

Podlesnyi and F

E. Podlesnyi and F. Oikonomou,Insights from leptohadronic modelling of the brightest blazar flare,2502.12111
[62]

Anchordoqui,Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays,Phys

L.A. Anchordoqui,Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays,Phys. Rept.801(2019) 1 [1807.09645]. – 15 –

2019 arXiv
[63]

Ptitsyna and S.V

K.V. Ptitsyna and S.V. Troitsky,Physical conditions in potential sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays. I. Updated Hillas plot and radiation-loss constraints,Phys. Usp.53(2010) 691 [0808.0367]

2010 arXiv
[65]

Ptitsyna and A

K. Ptitsyna and A. Neronov,Particle acceleration in the vacuum gaps in black hole magnetospheres,Astron. Astrophys.593(2016) A8 [1510.04023]

2016 arXiv
[66]

Gorbunov, P.G

D.S. Gorbunov, P.G. Tinyakov and S.V. Troitsky,Constraints on ultra-high energy neutrinos from optically thick astrophysical accelerators,Astropart. Phys.18(2003) 463 [astro-ph/0206385]

2003 arXiv
[67]

Blandford and A

R.D. Blandford and A. Levinson,Pair cascades in extragalactic jets. 1: Gamma rays, Astrophys. J.441(1995) 79

1995
[68]

Dermer and G

C.D. Dermer and G. Menon,High Energy Radiation from Black Holes: Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, and Neutrinos, Princeton University Press (10, 2009)

2009
[69]

Reimer, M

A. Reimer, M. Boettcher and S. Buson,Cascading Constraints from Neutrino-emitting Blazars: The Case of TXS 0506+056,Astrophys. J.881(2019) 46 [1812.05654]

2019 arXiv
[70]

Murase, S.S

K. Murase, S.S. Kimura and P. Meszaros,Hidden Cores of Active Galactic Nuclei as the Origin of Medium-Energy Neutrinos: Critical Tests with the MeV Gamma-Ray Connection,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 011101 [1904.04226]

2020 arXiv
[71]

E. Kun, I. Bartos, J. Becker Tjus, P.L. Biermann, F. Halzen and G. Mező,Cosmic Neutrinos from Temporarily Gamma-suppressed Blazars,Astrophys. J. Lett.911(2021) L18 [2009.09792]

2021 arXiv
[72]

Hovatta et al.,Association of IceCube neutrinos with radio sources observed at Owens Valley and Metsähovi Radio Observatories,Astron

T. Hovatta et al.,Association of IceCube neutrinos with radio sources observed at Owens Valley and Metsähovi Radio Observatories,Astron. Astrophys.650(2021) A83 [2009.10523]

2021 arXiv
[73]

Klinger, A

M. Klinger, A. Rudolph, X. Rodrigues, C. Yuan, G.F. de Clairfontaine, A. Fedynitch et al., AM3: An Open-source Tool for Time-dependent Lepto-hadronic Modeling of Astrophysical Sources,Astrophys. J. Suppl.275(2024) 4 [2312.13371]

2024 arXiv
[74]

Gilmore, R.S

R.C. Gilmore, R.S. Somerville, J.R. Primack and A. Dominguez,Semi-analytic modeling of the EBL and consequences for extragalactic gamma-ray spectra,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.422 (2012) 3189 [1104.0671]

2012 arXiv
[75]

Petrov and Y.Y

L.Y. Petrov and Y.Y. Kovalev,The Radio Fundamental Catalog. I. Astrometry,Astrophys. J. Suppl.276(2025) 38 [2410.11794]

2025 arXiv
[76]

Hovatta, E

T. Hovatta, E. Nieppola, M. Tornikoski, E. Valtaoja, M.F. Aller and H.D. Aller,Long-term radio variability of AGN: flare characteristics,Astron. Astrophys.485(2008) 51 [0805.1283]

2008 arXiv
[77]

Liodakis, V

I. Liodakis, V. Pavlidou, T. Hovatta, W. Max-Moerbeck, T.J. Pearson, J.L. Richards et al., Bimodal radio variability in OVRO-40 m-monitored blazars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.467 (2017) 4565 [1702.05493]. – 16 –

2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [64]

Sotirov,General constraints on sources of high-energy cosmic rays from interaction losses, Phys

S. Sotirov,General constraints on sources of high-energy cosmic rays from interaction losses, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123018 [2212.03483]

arXiv 2023

[2] [6]

S.W. Li, P. Machado, D. Naredo-Tuero and T. Schwemberger,Clash of the Titans: ultra-high energy KM3NeT event versus IceCube data,2502.04508. [7]IceCube, Fermi-LAT, MAGIC, AGILE, ASAS-SN, HA WC, H.E.S.S., INTEGRAL, Kanata, Kiso, Kapteyn, Liverpool Telescope, Subaru, Swift NuSTAR, VERITAS, VLA/17B-403collaboration,Multimessenger observations of a flaring bl...

arXiv 2018

[3] [8]

Kadler et al.,Coincidence of a high-fluence blazar outburst with a PeV-energy neutrino event,Nature Phys.12(2016) 807 [1602.02012]

M. Kadler et al.,Coincidence of a high-fluence blazar outburst with a PeV-energy neutrino event,Nature Phys.12(2016) 807 [1602.02012]

arXiv 2016

[4] [9]

Plavin, Y.Y

A. Plavin, Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev and S. Troitsky,Observational Evidence for the Origin of High-energy Neutrinos in Parsec-scale Nuclei of Radio-bright Active Galaxies,Astrophys. J. 894(2020) 101 [2001.00930]

arXiv 2020

[5] [10]

Plavin, Y.Y

A.V. Plavin, Y.Y. Kovalev, Y.A. Kovalev and S.V. Troitsky,Growing evidence for high-energy neutrinos originating in radio blazars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.523(2023) 1799 [2211.09631]

arXiv 2023

[6] [11]

Troitsky,Constraints on models of the origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,Usp

S.V. Troitsky,Constraints on models of the origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos,Usp. Fiz. Nauk191(2021) 1333 [2112.09611]

arXiv 2021

[7] [12]

Troitsky,Origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos: new results and prospects,Usp

S. Troitsky,Origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos: new results and prospects,Usp. Fiz. Nauk194(2024) 371 [2311.00281]. [13]KM3NeT, MessMapp Group, Fermi-LAT, Owens V alley Radio Obser v atory 40-m Telescope Group, SVOM, and otherscollaboration,Characterising Candidate Blazar Counterparts of the Ultra-High-Energy Event KM3-230213A,2502.08484

arXiv 2024

[8] [14]

Richards et al.,Blazars in the Fermi Era: The OVRO 40-m Telescope Monitoring Program,Astrophys

J.L. Richards et al.,Blazars in the Fermi Era: The OVRO 40-m Telescope Monitoring Program,Astrophys. J. Suppl.194(2011) 29 [1011.3111]

arXiv 2011